It seams to me if Congress is to regulate Commerce as he says, then the Obama & Holder fan culb have carried out Treason & Direct Constitution contempt in seeking to suit a fellow member of the League of common defense for seeking to secure the National defense from invasion, lets not for get then the guns walking matter would a Act of war with out the vote or concent of congress as well in violation of inter national law
He is right the zones and gun laws are unconstiutional what he fails to say what views did so the supreme court use its the 9th Amendment unholds the 2 via views from the dick Act of 1902. declairs such anti self defense laws as unconstitutional. They have to declare it as such or The paid common defense of the league or {police} would not be able to come on sight ie the factors of common law & the views of the 3rd Amendment & Say HR 218 Schools are public land not private owned
@BruceMichaelAnderson the lawyer was very smart to use US Title 42 usc section 1983 & 1985 and the views points of the enforcement Act history 1866-70
the view point of the Congressional powers & the Commerce, & fire Arms & states right verses federal regulation! Gibbons V. ogden 9 Wheaton 1 {1824} As i understand it Gibbons V. ogden 9 Wheaton 1 {1824} was not over the 2 Amendment it was over the voluntary tax system that would become the home stead act , The 1824 Action was the regulation of the standard of money {currency} from state to state as to the fight of water way rights, that so became a match of the lighting fire of the civil war!
The right to sue is everyone's right. Why look to a congressional act to pursue civil damages. Isn't that redundant. He was admittedly guilty, though not criminally punished?
This fellow is teaching according to the Case Method. To divine the meaning of the Commerce Clause, he never once quotes any of the Founding Fathers; never mentions the Constitutional Convention or the Ratification Debates. Everything revolves around the Supreme Court's interpretation of the clause.
Just briefed the Lopez case. Ridiculously overstepping of the commerce clause. If the commerce clause fed laws prohibit this, than where do they stop?
We can never find justice at the hands of corrupt judges. (See YouTube videos) Judge to Judge on Illegal Payments to Judges / Evil Triangle of Court Corruption / Richard Fine / Dr Shirley Moore /SBX 211. The fight to end this title wave of corruption in our country must start with the corrupt judges. We can not bring evidence of corruption to corrupt judges. Los Angeles Superior Court judges are illegally and unconstitutionally taking 50,000.00 each for a total of 23 million per year.
What's the difference between a Crime and an Offense ?, also, what is the difference between Lawful/Unlawful and Legal/Illegal ?..Oh, while we're at it, in law (I'm referring to Statutes/Act's/Codes....) what is the difference between a Person and a Man/Woman ?...
This guy is one of those people that thinks the constitution is a "living, breathing document". A simple study of the charters of England at the time the founders were writing the constitution would show that that sort of thing is the last thing the founders would've left us.
Well, although there are some limitations and pitfalls to living constitutionalism, I would say that even originalists (like, say, Scalia) take pages from it. Take the second amendment for example. The term "the people" would have originally meant white males, able bodied, of a certain age. We changed the meaning as society changed and originalists do not see to find folly in that.
This is as at USC right? I am a junior in high school and want to go to USC for college and I have a 2.9 GPA and recently got my results from my ACT score in which I received a 30. Do you think I will be accepted or is my GPA to low for USC? I am in Chicago and would be paying out-of-state money so that could be a factor since the school would be making more money. I am hoping wherever I go to college that they have professors as good as this guy.
It is NOT an effect ON commerce to grow your own any more than it would be an effect on commerce Not to grow. You cannot FORCE anyone or everyone to grow food to support Commerce. Could the people at large be enslaved and forced to grow food to meet that supply? If they chose not to grow then couldn't the government just force the people to stop having a demand? or whip the slaves until they farmed up a supply? You can not force the masses to grow a supply; nor can you force them NOT to grow.
ok bottom !@#$ line here is get your mother!@$ing head right america. Lets stand up. You guys can keep diggin but this guy and Me, were standin up. Its obvious you incent folks havent stood inside the system. You can not teacj who doesnt want to learn
Question here, ? who is the officiate in charge of arresting those that break the law of our constitution? Or is it just an outline of hopefuls with a fantasy, pretending the way things should be ? Most in charge today would be shot for treason! I also think the duel was a great idea, lets reinstate that one!
Thank you for posting this. Can you please post more lectures other than Evidence? These are really interesting to me as a 0L looking to apply next cycle. Because of your Youtube videos, I have become very interested in USC Gould. Thanks!
is this a freshmen class?
virginiatechfanx 1 month ago
Comment removed
virginiatechfanx 1 month ago
Very wall said.
katheryncruz24 2 months ago
It seams to me if Congress is to regulate Commerce as he says, then the Obama & Holder fan culb have carried out Treason & Direct Constitution contempt in seeking to suit a fellow member of the League of common defense for seeking to secure the National defense from invasion, lets not for get then the guns walking matter would a Act of war with out the vote or concent of congress as well in violation of inter national law
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
He is right the zones and gun laws are unconstiutional what he fails to say what views did so the supreme court use its the 9th Amendment unholds the 2 via views from the dick Act of 1902. declairs such anti self defense laws as unconstitutional. They have to declare it as such or The paid common defense of the league or {police} would not be able to come on sight ie the factors of common law & the views of the 3rd Amendment & Say HR 218 Schools are public land not private owned
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
@BruceMichaelAnderson the lawyer was very smart to use US Title 42 usc section 1983 & 1985 and the views points of the enforcement Act history 1866-70
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
the view point of the Congressional powers & the Commerce, & fire Arms & states right verses federal regulation! Gibbons V. ogden 9 Wheaton 1 {1824} As i understand it Gibbons V. ogden 9 Wheaton 1 {1824} was not over the 2 Amendment it was over the voluntary tax system that would become the home stead act , The 1824 Action was the regulation of the standard of money {currency} from state to state as to the fight of water way rights, that so became a match of the lighting fire of the civil war!
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
The right to sue is everyone's right. Why look to a congressional act to pursue civil damages. Isn't that redundant. He was admittedly guilty, though not criminally punished?
marciahrn 5 months ago
Maybe if you tried pulling up Constitutional law.
Nataloff 6 months ago in playlist Education 2
Y is it when I pull up constautional law I only get white people hmmmmm
usaintltrade 6 months ago
Bright students can't remember to give their name before their answers...
LeperKing 6 months ago
This fellow is teaching according to the Case Method. To divine the meaning of the Commerce Clause, he never once quotes any of the Founding Fathers; never mentions the Constitutional Convention or the Ratification Debates. Everything revolves around the Supreme Court's interpretation of the clause.
jpschubbs 8 months ago
This guy is a HORRIBLE teacher.
greatbydesign33 8 months ago
Great Class!
privatepersonalc 10 months ago
This guy has a Jello Biafra inflection to his voice.
BELACSAMOHT 10 months ago
I <3'd my const law class....empowering
billdaddy26 11 months ago
Just briefed the Lopez case. Ridiculously overstepping of the commerce clause. If the commerce clause fed laws prohibit this, than where do they stop?
billdaddy26 11 months ago
@billdaddy26 Exactly.
jpschubbs 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We can never find justice at the hands of corrupt judges. (See YouTube videos) Judge to Judge on Illegal Payments to Judges / Evil Triangle of Court Corruption / Richard Fine / Dr Shirley Moore /SBX 211. The fight to end this title wave of corruption in our country must start with the corrupt judges. We can not bring evidence of corruption to corrupt judges. Los Angeles Superior Court judges are illegally and unconstitutionally taking 50,000.00 each for a total of 23 million per year.
danielcooper1000 1 year ago
This is a top law school?
philliesphan312 1 year ago
What's the difference between a Crime and an Offense ?, also, what is the difference between Lawful/Unlawful and Legal/Illegal ?..Oh, while we're at it, in law (I'm referring to Statutes/Act's/Codes....) what is the difference between a Person and a Man/Woman ?...
freedombiteback 1 year ago
This guy is one of those people that thinks the constitution is a "living, breathing document". A simple study of the charters of England at the time the founders were writing the constitution would show that that sort of thing is the last thing the founders would've left us.
Articulate? Yes. Correct? No.
growe73 1 year ago
Well, although there are some limitations and pitfalls to living constitutionalism, I would say that even originalists (like, say, Scalia) take pages from it. Take the second amendment for example. The term "the people" would have originally meant white males, able bodied, of a certain age. We changed the meaning as society changed and originalists do not see to find folly in that.
poolerboy0077 1 year ago
@poolerboy0077 lol...
freedombiteback 1 year ago
This is as at USC right? I am a junior in high school and want to go to USC for college and I have a 2.9 GPA and recently got my results from my ACT score in which I received a 30. Do you think I will be accepted or is my GPA to low for USC? I am in Chicago and would be paying out-of-state money so that could be a factor since the school would be making more money. I am hoping wherever I go to college that they have professors as good as this guy.
BillGatesMoney1 1 year ago
It is NOT an effect ON commerce to grow your own any more than it would be an effect on commerce Not to grow. You cannot FORCE anyone or everyone to grow food to support Commerce. Could the people at large be enslaved and forced to grow food to meet that supply? If they chose not to grow then couldn't the government just force the people to stop having a demand? or whip the slaves until they farmed up a supply? You can not force the masses to grow a supply; nor can you force them NOT to grow.
GunClingingPalin 1 year ago
@GunClingingPalin "affect" not "effect" look up the difference, one is direct and one is a result.
philliesphan312 1 year ago
@philliesphan312 I stand corrected on my spelling....and yes I do know the difference.. shall i use them in a sentence? ;)
GunClingingPalin 1 year ago
ok bottom !@#$ line here is get your mother!@$ing head right america. Lets stand up. You guys can keep diggin but this guy and Me, were standin up. Its obvious you incent folks havent stood inside the system. You can not teacj who doesnt want to learn
grock1980 2 years ago
interesting...
yuriopalev 2 years ago
This is a very articulate professor. USC's lucky to have him.
AboveAllNations 2 years ago
what LSAT score and gpa do u need to be admitted?
MacPr0xnxx0 2 years ago
Question here, ? who is the officiate in charge of arresting those that break the law of our constitution? Or is it just an outline of hopefuls with a fantasy, pretending the way things should be ? Most in charge today would be shot for treason! I also think the duel was a great idea, lets reinstate that one!
buddo1999 2 years ago
wow 1:00:00
flairphantem 2 years ago
Keep it coming. This is Valuable
Thanks Much.
Amalioji2 2 years ago
Thank you for posting this. Can you please post more lectures other than Evidence? These are really interesting to me as a 0L looking to apply next cycle. Because of your Youtube videos, I have become very interested in USC Gould. Thanks!
bsilfan 3 years ago
This is an easy class
ClaireTheCareBear 3 years ago
gosh that's a hard class
but seem like fun
mouelafrica 3 years ago
I CAN´T BELIEVE THIS IS AVAILABLE
adrianove 3 years ago