Added: 10 months ago
From: TheLeftSpace
Views: 7,005
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (27)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @1337chsacker watch?v=XjL--px96Kc near the end Arnie Gunderson address's the "the 23 Mark one boiling water reactors currently in operation....". point game match period paragraph end of report. Ta-dah!

  • @1337chsacker Good Riddance. Westinghouse Mark 1 reactors are not graphite. They are at Fukushima and elsewhere around the around the world, 20 some in number

  • @1337chsacker You are completely wrong. Mark one refers to first generation Westinghouse reactors. Some of the original designers resigned from the Fukushima projuect, they were so unsafe. Chernobyl was graphite had has Nothing to do with the subject. Keep learning. I would go to Arnold Gunderson's channel he speaks on them at some length.

  • @IExposeMormonism

    You mormon lover.

  • @1337chsacker Find Arnold Gunderson and Christopher Buzby on YT. Gunderson has :"Fairewinds" on YT. Both will say what I've typed here, Fuku' is so far past Chernobyl there is no comparison. reactor 3 was a nuclear detonation and spewed over 600,000 plutonium pellets up to 2 miles away."Breath deep, breath in the air, don't be afraid to care..." MsMilkeytheclown has videos of both of them and lots of other current bad news.I didn't say Chernobyl was a Mark 1,I said the USA has Mark 1 reactors

  • @1337chsacker Arnold Gunderson disagrees with you and I'll go with him. I think he says some 20 reactors are Mark 1 design. Now, go back into your fantasy land cave of "It can't happen here". Frank Zappa proved in 1967, you're an idiot, wake up. It can happen here. And it will. Ft Calhoun, Taos, and the East Coast Earthquake are trying to tell you something. "AwakenFinland" has interviews with Arto Lauri, another nuke expert who disagrees with you.

  • @1337chsacker All the Mark 1 reactors are flawed in design. Hence the 3 complete meltdowns at Fukushima. And the USA has many Mark 1's, some 20, I think. Also, there are over 300% more spent fuel rods in storage than designed for. In part because there is nowhere to store them. There are issues with the placement of reactors, like Ft Calhoun, which was under some 8ft of water. In case of an external power failure, backup power for USA reactors is Less than at Fukushima. So, we're fuku'd

  • @1337chsacker USA plants are NOT safe. Reactors are built and run in the assumption that nothing serious will happen, such as human error or natural catastrophe. American reactors were built and sold all over the world under this presumption. Nothing can contain the kind of power that nuclear reactors have once they go out of control. There are different and better ways to use nuclear energy for the same purpose of generating electricity and scientists know about them, but nobody else cares.

  • first film is great

    2nd one starts at 1:32:38, is good too [from horizon 1991 and 1996]

  • we believed and beloved in blind for the government.... that was our problem......... and ye have same problem till that day... :) no government cares on individual..the sooner you understand that people the better... irw

  • The moral of the story is that you should not build reactors without any containment structures, and operatethem against instructions.

  • Thank you so much.

    I learned alot from this.

    It should be broadcast worldwide on tv for all to see.

    This leads me to worry even more about Fukushima.

  • What the fuck have they learned since then?.....NOTHING! People...we need to get together and make a difference...NOW! Stop any nuclear power....lets rely on the natural resourses...

  • @Autronia Idiot then they Will run out. Fucking do your homework before commenting

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more