Added: 4 years ago
From: quantumshifttv
Views: 8,493
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What the fuck? Sustainable agriculture sequesters 100% more carbon than conventional agriculture because Chemical PHARMING Kills the fukin soil (and no life, means no humus, which means no soil bonds, which means top soil loss).

    Doesn't matter anyway, there's no money in sustainable agriculture so it won't matter a fuck. Greedy cunts run the show

  • Everybody try to make a buck on this global warming scam.

  • @johnsenkenn thats what is what designed for lol

  • Organic farming is a good practice and sometimes the produce is better than large scale industrial farming. If the entire world switches over to organic farming about 2 billion people are going to go hungry with the decrease in crop production. Global warming/ climate change is political bullshit. It's nothing more than a thin veil for a Marxist agenda. Think that's wrong? Just compare the provisions of the Copenhagen treaty to the principles of Marxism. The sky is not falling :o/

  • @komatsukid1 Oh for goodness sake think for self. We may need a few people on the land to compensate....but would that be a bad thing? Wake up mate- Pharming kills the soil - we'll all be starving if it continues. That's a fact

  • @FreemanOftheMind actually @komatsukid1 is right, there have been estimates that without artificial nitrogen fertilizers, the planet could only grow 1/2 of the food it currently does. As for climate change being bullshit? I'm not so sure. Either way we have a dilemma as the population grows to 9 billion people who demand higher quality diets...

  • @cornandstuff Mate do your homework. See for yourself soil which has been farmed chemically. It's dead mate, pure a simple. Stuff wont grow without fertilisers or without biological remediation to bring the soil food web back into play.

    There's no shortage of nitrogen in the air and hence has the capacity to be in the soil. The human will might be lacking but you can be sure where there's a dollar to be made from fertilisers, the truth will be the first casualty.

  • @FreemanOftheMind Unfortunately biological process of fixing nitrogen from the air can't supply enough nitrogen for today's high yielding systems. The proof is in history, when we had the green revolution, agricultural output increased dramatically with increased fertilizer inputs. The trouble is, we are used to cheap 'chemical' food now, it isn't easy to go back, especially with the populations we have to sustain. Organics is a rich mans food.

  • @cornandstuff - I see your point but dude, peasant farmers have been eating organics for centuries. Chemical PHarming is only 50-60 years old. Peasant farmers aren't rich by any stretch. The real problem is access to LAND and the system which sees BANKS sucking the life blood out of everyone through Usury and FIAT money. If we could simply allow people who wanted to nurture the land the ability to do so (without crazy mortgages) organics would be everywhere. The rabbit hole is a deep one

  • yep, soil is the solution to glaobal warming, and when all the hippies and doom sayers get their head out of it they will realise they are just doing the work of big political machines (the UN etc) and that it is all BS.

  • poor health is more expensive

    fast food is bad

    how much is a TRIPLE BYPASS operation if you have to pay for it ?

  • Good point but one problem. Not everyone is able to afford organic foods.

  • SheaClayFarms I don't thing this clip is about asking you to buy organic, it is about the farming practices.

    In regards to buying organic. The cheapest way to buy organic is to buy organic heirloom seeds and grow your own food. You get free food that you can save the seed from and grow again next season.

  • Agreed, but if we can encourage everyone to maybe buy even one item now and again, an economy of scale will gradually build and the prices will come down. Market forces will reach a point where farmers who had previously been producing in an unsustainable way will have to follow the lead of consumers, leading to a win for all sides.

    If farming can be changed to help reduce atmospheric CO2 by 20%, we have to explore this.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more