if you understand tennis you'll know that this draw won't happen.. FYI, the no 1 and 2 seeds will be at opposite halves.. so how can nadal and djoko be in the same half?
i'm a huge huge federer fan but i feel this is almost impossible.. if you watched the games these few months since AO, he's not hitting as well, slower by half a step and his shots on key points are just not good enough at the moment.. its really painful to see him lose to melzer and then gasquet.. normally he would breeze past them.. i'm very sad to say that this is an end to an amazing era that is roger federer.. he's the reason why i'm watching and playing tennis..
Why does the commentator say that Federer was the only former champion in the draw. You only have to look at the guy he's playing to know that's not true. Hewitt won in 2002.
@arranparry07 Well Obviously you didn't get what he meant... The commentator said that the defending Champion (referring to Federer) and the only former Champion left in the draw (REFERRING TO DRAW) but it happens... I HOPE YOU HAVE GOT IT NOW... let me know in case you haven't
@YoSoyZuri Just because they say "come on" or "vamos" doesn't make them more or less of a tennis warrior. Fact is, you're just a biased Rafatard. Players like Federer, Roddick, practically anyone in the top 20 wants it just as bad as Rafael. The only difference is they don't pick their asses and say "vamos" every time they hit a routine volley.
@DIANAROSS4EVER ... It was Hewitt himself who compare Rafa to himself! As for technique, is very nice that he has technique, Rafa has won 9 GS and 19 Masters!!!!! I suppose he has done is without technique! If that was the case, if a player as young as Rafa could win so much without technique, who needs would need it? Has Hewitt win as much as Rafa?
in my opinion nadal can't stop federer in the wimbledon's 2008 final.federer play a geat tennis in this moment and he didn't lose any set.nadal lost one vs gulbis.
i hope federer will beat him. but to be honest with you i'm a little afraid because nadal plays a fery good tournament too! it was that fucking french open final that makes me a little worried. i hope roger forget about that.he can beat nadal on every court without clay but at the moment nadal has the psychologically advantage.i hope he will kick his ass for that french open final!
you have made good point here, because the French Open final was like a severe beating for Roger. But we know Rafa won just about everything this year; only his body would stop him!
Well I mean his gameplay in general will stop him. Its not like his body is out to get him. The way he plays would hurt anybody. Just part of the sacrifices he has to make to stay at the level Federer is.
federer is prehaps the best tennis player ever to set foot on a grass court. But watching him, he doesn't play with the passion that hewitt does, or that said the same as nadal. i would sooner watch pasionate play then techinal genius. COME ON NADAL!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Hewitt has 8 break chances, but he can not convert it even one and roger just has 3 but he can convert it all. So federer won is by pure luck NOT by he has good tennis skill.
what kind of game analysis is that???We can tell from your comment that you have so much knolwedge and experience in tennis or any other sport!!congrats !!sigh(sarcasm)!!
If Roger turn into the GOD.Mod he is unstoppable !!!
Deeennisteeennis 7 months ago
I never played on grass ... must be awesome
DuendeDude 8 months ago
My grad slams predictions :
1. Novak djokovic already done - Australian open
2. Roger federer - French open (yes it will be a suprise for everybody)
3. Roger federer - Wimbledon (He owns wimbledon if he is healthy)
4. Roger federer - US open
satishsatishiyer 10 months ago
@satishsatishiyer
I'll marry you when this happens
MattS04hias 10 months ago
@MattS04hias
It realy is a possibility in my opinion
Heres my pick.
1. Roger federer will win all 3 majors.
Berdych or soderling will be beat djokovic and nadal before the final. of french open
2. this wimbledon. roger will dominate it..
3. US open... (murray beats djoko and rafa before finals)
I seriously do not see anybody other than nadal and djoko who can be confident enough to beat a healthy federer
satishsatishiyer 10 months ago
@MattS04hias Heres the dream draw for me at the french..
1. Nadal , djokovic, soderling, berdych should be in same half...
if this happens i can sense that french open is almost in federer's hand
Please pray that this draw happens
satishsatishiyer 10 months ago
@satishsatishiyer
if you understand tennis you'll know that this draw won't happen.. FYI, the no 1 and 2 seeds will be at opposite halves.. so how can nadal and djoko be in the same half?
MarkDeng9 9 months ago
@satishsatishiyer
i'm a huge huge federer fan but i feel this is almost impossible.. if you watched the games these few months since AO, he's not hitting as well, slower by half a step and his shots on key points are just not good enough at the moment.. its really painful to see him lose to melzer and then gasquet.. normally he would breeze past them.. i'm very sad to say that this is an end to an amazing era that is roger federer.. he's the reason why i'm watching and playing tennis..
MarkDeng9 9 months ago
"drown their sorrows" LOL
misterlonely1446 1 year ago 2
hewitt was done from 03. I don't know why he keep playing.
Thutmosis7 1 year ago
federer the best forever
fg086 1 year ago
Why does the commentator say that Federer was the only former champion in the draw. You only have to look at the guy he's playing to know that's not true. Hewitt won in 2002.
arranparry07 1 year ago
@arranparry07 Well Obviously you didn't get what he meant... The commentator said that the defending Champion (referring to Federer) and the only former Champion left in the draw (REFERRING TO DRAW) but it happens... I HOPE YOU HAVE GOT IT NOW... let me know in case you haven't
satishsatishiyer 1 year ago
@satishsatishiyer Alright mate, I didn't know it was such a touchy subject! Haha.
arranparry07 1 year ago
you are all talking about how Nadal can stop Fed but you saw what happened last time Fed won 2 sets by 0 and i think it will be that way from now on
Maslionka12 2 years ago
im so happy, im going to wimbledon monday 2nd week. does anyone know if thats day 7 or day 8, cos do you include the sunday before where no one plays
federerrockz 2 years ago
I love Hewitt, he's another warrior like Rafa. He has not been in his best but now he's comming back and i am glad.
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago 7
@YoSoyZuri Just because they say "come on" or "vamos" doesn't make them more or less of a tennis warrior. Fact is, you're just a biased Rafatard. Players like Federer, Roddick, practically anyone in the top 20 wants it just as bad as Rafael. The only difference is they don't pick their asses and say "vamos" every time they hit a routine volley.
AllGenreMusic 1 year ago
@YoSoyZuri Don't compare please. Hewitt is a warrior with technique
DIANAROSS4EVER 9 months ago
@DIANAROSS4EVER ... It was Hewitt himself who compare Rafa to himself! As for technique, is very nice that he has technique, Rafa has won 9 GS and 19 Masters!!!!! I suppose he has done is without technique! If that was the case, if a player as young as Rafa could win so much without technique, who needs would need it? Has Hewitt win as much as Rafa?
YoSoyZuri 8 months ago
@DIANAROSS4EVER ... I would have answer you in a different way but I do not want to offend Leiton because someone makes an idiotic comment!
YoSoyZuri 8 months ago
roger is just a superb shot maker, you have to appreciate it when he kills it on those winners..
reefric 3 years ago 9
Federer Hewitt is one of the best match ups ever....thats if hewitt plays his best
BrotherTree1 3 years ago
haha i think its funny how they show when hewitt starts losing, the aussie's bring the beer out :)
Etownmu 3 years ago
federer is the best in the history of tennis .. is bigger than what has been ..
tebipau 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Federer was..... today is another day
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago
in my opinion nadal can't stop federer in the wimbledon's 2008 final.federer play a geat tennis in this moment and he didn't lose any set.nadal lost one vs gulbis.
swisetime 3 years ago
i hope federer will beat him. but to be honest with you i'm a little afraid because nadal plays a fery good tournament too! it was that fucking french open final that makes me a little worried. i hope roger forget about that.he can beat nadal on every court without clay but at the moment nadal has the psychologically advantage.i hope he will kick his ass for that french open final!
maddes111 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shut up
tml12 3 years ago
you have made good point here, because the French Open final was like a severe beating for Roger. But we know Rafa won just about everything this year; only his body would stop him!
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago
Well I mean his gameplay in general will stop him. Its not like his body is out to get him. The way he plays would hurt anybody. Just part of the sacrifices he has to make to stay at the level Federer is.
AnimeIntroStyles4 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you are soooooo wrong! Nadal can stop Federer everywhere. He is the only man in tennis who can upset Fed's game.
YoSoyZuri 3 years ago
federer is prehaps the best tennis player ever to set foot on a grass court. But watching him, he doesn't play with the passion that hewitt does, or that said the same as nadal. i would sooner watch pasionate play then techinal genius. COME ON NADAL!!
mcminime182 3 years ago
chunvorn u just... noob.
FrosT74 3 years ago
If federer haas had just 3 BP it's just beacause it converted ALL his break points dude...
FrosT74 3 years ago
Thanks for posting!
Yes, yes, yes!
bobgure 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Hewitt has 8 break chances, but he can not convert it even one and roger just has 3 but he can convert it all. So federer won is by pure luck NOT by he has good tennis skill.
chhunvorn 3 years ago
Lol how about it was federer who can hold his nerves in the most important points and hewitt not?
karmiva 3 years ago 3
what kind of game analysis is that???We can tell from your comment that you have so much knolwedge and experience in tennis or any other sport!!congrats !!sigh(sarcasm)!!
FedererTKing 3 years ago
yeah...meaning that roger is way better than hewitt..
BrotherTree1 3 years ago
i like how federer hits his racket when he wins. djokociv immitates him very well
ilovejene4ka 3 years ago