海灯法师传说中的一指禅神功

[NguyenHungQ]

sick

[simonrexy]

他的手指不像是承受很大重量的样子，很像只是很轻松地点在地上~­

[jiba1573]

@simonrexy 确实不像处于受力状态

[ga874927]

來吧 用一指禪穿牆~~~

[omgdntdie]

這影片是中國fake文化的驕傲

[keungkeung59]

何不鍛鍊鍛鍊那兒話成為『一屌禪』神功，鋼般的屌、鳥、撚、柒、­尻、小弟弟，

還有一點實際的用處。

[keungkeung59]

屌！吊wire 架，就算你是真的，此等"功夫"對人體健康有何好處？對武術格鬥­有何幫忙？這好比有人練成『連環十八屁』，世界上無人能及，那又­如何？無聊～

要知道中國連雞蛋都有假的，屁聲也許是音響裝置吧了。

[jj987987987]

@keungkeung59 對健康沒有好處,但這是海賊王CP9訓練指槍的基本功,阿哈哈哈­

[push0678]

台灣廖國豪以練成一陽指神功，要挑戰大陸嘴砲功法

[justing8971]

內功同輕功真係有嫁..別以為這是廢的..如果你天天都練內功.­.你50年之後一定會有大成..

[poidsfi]

LOL, fake shit,

[prowessjen]

@poidsfi you are retarded. that's real shit

[poidsfi]

@prowessjen , You're really dumb, illiterate or very ignorant to say that shit's real,

[prowessjen]

@poidsfi well, i know YOU are retarded..enough said

[wo223344]

我只是想看他做的開始至結尾,為什不給我們看..?

[JiaYu8]

可能是找一间天花板很低的房子 把镜头倒着拍的吧 我看他都不拍他整个脚

[bestprayer]

@JiaYu8 谁说没拍整个脚啊，你没看仔细好吧。。。明明脚矮着墙呢。说实话­，中国只要不是神话迷信，武功之类的还是可信的。

[e490318]

他還沒練到最上乘

最上乘是腳不用靠牆

上半身完全騰空 而且是小指著地

然後還能像陀螺依樣旋轉

體重要超過100公斤 這樣才能體現中國武術的博大精深

[darklordtang]

这个已经证明是假的，快删除吧。别给中国武术抹黑

[lajostibi]

Great respect for Monk Hal-Tark !

Long live China and chinese people!

[6parker]

什么什么？一指禅只有这一人会练？？我打赌今天的释永信法师也会­，只是用的是下面那根棍棍。

[feelingsyt]

明理的人都知道凡事都不能以偏蓋全,這門功夫我相信是真的,

根據記載,這是應片商要求海燈重現一指禪所拍的影片,但因年事已­高過程需要經旁人協助下才有辦法重現拍攝,也因此有惹上爭議

但海燈的功夫底子是肯定的,從小習武個頭矮小,年輕時做一指倒立­相信對他而言是非常輕易的事

[rollinkong]

its real u ignorant pigs! this old man will knock ur daughters socks out if u guys dont stfu!

[jj987987987]

一點身法都沒有,最好是真的

[nivla16]

fake!!

[pullman600]

海灯法师只有成都人晓得了！~是绝对强大的，推荐去看一看《鲁豫­有约》，有一期讲成都武林的，里面就有一个代表少林的，是海灯法­师的徒弟。

[wangyangtr]

海灯就是一个大骗子，看看《谎言重复一千遍》吧.

[roy1015]

一群无知的人。说话前也不去看看书，做做research。就知­道对骂。

[z7247427]

或許是吊鋼絲也不一定

但我相信一定有人可以單指到立

[goldcoat123]

是真的，年纪大点的都知道海灯法师的。前几个月普京去少林寺，不­是还观看了，左右手各一个手指的倒立，不过旁边有人帮助平衡 ，海灯法师还可以单手用两个手指头倒立，纯倒立，不靠别的支撑，­就一只手上的两个手指头（十指和中指）

[KaizerDraco]

watch?v=4fZMatxR2So&feature=re­lated

fake 你妈个X, 自己看， 太多智障儿

[smalljetrbother]

fake fake fake fake fake 經證實 這老頭(海燈法師)整個身體是用鋼絲吊起來的 就跟武打片一樣有吊車或者是有很多人來控制鋼絲 所以這沒什麼了不起 我也會 很多少林寺武功神功都是在唬爛的 躺釘床 胸口碎大石 鐵槍叉喉 這些都是唬爛的 有興趣知道的可以問我 這些都只是一些簡單基本的物理原理而已 根本不需要什麼高深武功 而且這些也稱不上是武功

[wbybill]

确实如此。

[xuhenryca]

拿无知当无畏的本钱

傻逼一个

[MrLEE0011]

你录段铁枪叉喉的视频上来。我就很佩服你

[tangkeetong]

別的我不知道, 但內功,氣硬功及輕功的確是存在的...

另外...少林寺真的功夫不是雜技表現, 正宗少林都不練頂槍釘床的, 不要給混淆...

[bgla45]

雖然有靠牆壁分散重量 但是那也是因為光靠一根手指 是幾乎無法平衡的 所以說不定可以更強一點 但是先決條件下 是能取得平衡

[pojinhk]

七八十高齡都咁勁,我指上壓都唔多掂呢.

[borisdmhk]

Never pan above his feets

[dannyhlin]

I was thinking the same thing until 1:11-1:13.

[thinstall]

好家在有牆壁幫他分散重量！

[MrMarcusMonster]

it's fake, officially. search by his name and u'll know

[kent123111]

fake i think...not even able to have far shot for audience...

[hei2005]

continue..

personally i dun see any force or tension, is on the finger!

[of course just based on my common sense! and 1 fin

ger jap this trick is far beyond our common sense of course!]

so, at this moment, i dun beleive this video!

but i also watched a 2 fingers jap on tv too!

[hei2005]

i cannot say this video is fake or true!

but, we can only see that still motion!

at least we cannot see how he complete the motions step by step!

so, just a still picture without any movement b4 or after!

we cannot see anythings on the wall or behind the fingers!

[zhuz50]

Qi gong is not some thing which is matter, infact Qi it self isnt a matter, it is made up of neutrinos(its a type of dark matter which floats around in the universe) , scientist are trying to find out how it works, so shut up and stop saying its fake when u dont even know a shit about it. Even i can do a upstand with 4 fingers with out the wall, so those who are saying its fake STFU!

[lennyhipp]

four fingers and ONE finger are two different things... this defies several LAWS of physics. To say that qi is made of neutrinos shows your vast ignorance of what neutrinos are, and to make your argument from authority fallacy that dark matter and neutrinos are the same thing is just idiocy!

[zhuz50]

U guys who are saying its fake are super retards...u dont believe it simply because the modern science can not explain such things. That only means the science isnt developed enough! 200 years ago no one can explain how magnets works, doesnt mean magnetic force didnt exist at the time!

[lennyhipp]

"u dont believe it simply because the modern science can not explain such things. "

no, i don't believe it because it DEFIES science and there is ZERO proof for it.

[dannyhlin]

If you say everything that defies science is fake, then you're prone to falsification-evasion, which is a staple of pseudo-science (per Popper?).

And the fact is ... science errs from time to time.

[lennyhipp]

"If you say everything that defies science is fake"

*sigh* You people LOVE trying to put words in my mouth. I didn't say science couldn't explain it, i said it defies science... as in well-established laws of physics.

"And the fact is ... science errs from time to time"

yes it does... you let me know the next time when gravity errs. Also, google something called "onus of proof"

I would love for someone to actually have superhuman powers, but it certainly isn't this guy!

[dannyhlin]

i don't believe it because it DEFIES science

I didn't put anything into ur mouth. these r ur exact words.

"as in well-established laws of physics"

which laws of physics does it defy and how? care to be specific?

"you let me know the next time when gravity errs"

u do realize how much relevant theory has been modified?

"google something called "onus of proof""

realize i have no intention to prove this clip is truthful? i'm focusing on the strength of ur reasoning.

[lennyhipp]

"which laws of physics does it defy and how? care to be specific?"

is GRAVITY specific enough?!

"u do realize how much relevant theory has been modified?"

Irrelevant.

"realize i have no intention to prove this clip is truthful? i'm focusing on the strength of ur reasoning."

if you were, you wouldn't be asking at all, and you'd know all along where the onus of proof lies...

[dannyhlin]

"is GRAVITY specific enough?!"

Not quite. To be specific, I think it's more related to human anatomy, and you're more than welcome to prove human anatomy does not allow a man to hold part of his body weight with one index finger. Gravity itself doesn't say what you're saying.

[dannyhlin]

""u do realize how much relevant theory has been modified?"

Irrelevant."

I said "science errs from time to time" and unless you're mixing up science as a discipline and the object of scientific focus, what you're referring to "gravity" really means "the theory of gravity" and not gravity per se. And as it is a human discipline and theory, it's modification in history is of course relevant as a response to your comment that "you let me know the next time when gravity errs"

[dannyhlin]

"if you were, you wouldn't be asking at all."

My asking whether or not you get my real question substantiates the claim that I am not really focusing on the strength of your reasoning?

Odd...

One more time: I'm not claiming what the clip represents is real, but I am questioning your reasoning. So, I really don't have the "onus of proof" as in the onus of proof of proving what the clip represents is truthful.

In terms of my real question, the onus of proof is actually on you.

[lennyhipp]

"In terms of my real question, the onus of proof is actually on you."

basic logic fail.

i'm NOT the one making the claim, and the onus of proof is ALWAYS on he who makes it.

Really stymies me how you think it's more related to human anatomy than it is for gravity. Where do you suppose his center of gravity is in the above demonstration!?

[dannyhlin]

Yes, and you made the claim that " it defies science... as in well-established laws of physics." Indeed, the burden to prove the authenticity of what the video portrays is on those who claim it to be true. Yet, this does not mean any claim made by the skeptic is automatically justified. Otherwise, nothing could be proved. There's a difference between the skeptic not accepting the claim to authenticity and claiming it to be false. I hope you get my point.

Again, I'm not saying the clip is real.

[dannyhlin]

"his center of gravity is in the above demonstration!?"

1. You're saying it wouldn't be unfeasible should the center of gravity be proper?

2. To be scientific, why don't you topple down the nonsense in a scientific way? I look forward to your diagrams and calculation that explain how the center of gravity makes the purported performance impossible

3. I actually doubt Fadeng's index finger could sustain that much weight.

[lennyhipp]

"You're saying it wouldn't be unfeasible should the center of gravity be proper?"

i'm saying it's physically impossible for his torso not to bend when his center of gravity should be just above his waist.

" I actually doubt Fadeng's index finger could sustain that much weight."

huh. sounds like you answered your own question! Not to mention his forearm shows zero stress/ strain on it. Nor does his wrist. not to mention the lack of blood flow to his head and hand.

it's just plain silly.

[dannyhlin]

"i'm saying it's physically impossible for his torso not to bend when his center of gravity should be just above his waist."

1st science, 2nd gravity, and now posture? u realize u're changing register to human anatomy? I would agree his posture makes it difficult for his torso to remain straight, but u still have a long way to prove that it's impossible (not that i disagree).

"sounds like you answered your own question!"

u must've misunderstood my question from the very beginning. read again.

[lennyhipp]

"1st science, 2nd gravity, and now posture?"

all three are related. any moron but yourself would have realized this.

"u realize u're changing register to human anatomy?"

not making sense

"I would agree his posture makes it difficult for his torso to remain straight"

difficult, or impossible?!

"but u still have a long way to prove that it's impossible"

the onus of proof DOES NOT lie on myself to disprove this lying old man and disingenous film makers

[dannyhlin]

"Not to mention his forearm shows zero stress/ strain on it. Nor does his wrist. not to mention the lack of blood flow to his head and hand."

not to say gravity has nothing to do wit it, but if this is ur evidence, i'd think u'd need something more than the laws of physics, or, to be precise, gravity. not to say u're comments up to now are scientific or rigorous tho..

[lennyhipp]

you're a little nuts for implying it's up to ME to disprove anything. I'm NOT the one making a claim here. There are people here saying this is real, the film makers are the one making a claim. They're provided ZERO empirical evidence to back their claims. They have a video that could have VERY easily been filmed upside down, &do NOT show him getting into the position, lack of stress on his finger, wrist, arm points to it being fake, his torso points to it being fake, logic dictates it's fake

[chong1982]

I heard of that it was fake, but I don't know how.

One thing is clear: we can't see any tension throughout his finger, arm, and body.

[ckcclinton]

how u know its fake =.=

[cherui]

unfortunately this one is fake. he fooled several billion people. i guess this video was shot around 20 years ago, when his name was so popular that there was even a complete TV show dedicated to him. later on a report came out disclosing this whole thing and that monk's name is never mentioned again.

it's great to see so many people are interested in shaolin kungfu, but i have to tell you the truth on this one.

[nickel1106]

Liar!!!

[lennyhipp]

cherui,

thank you for this. yes, he was exposed in a documentary in 1979. The filmmakers showed that his feet were tied. His followers claimed this was necessary because of his age they were afraid he'd get hurt. Google this guy's name and the word fraud and you will find this info.

[apanakjadi28]

Oh! Uncle Lenny again, whistle blowing in the wilderness.

All your life you have been programmed with the word "fraud". You think typing the guy's name and the word fraud will google out the necessary link. BS! Show us how and provide us the necessary links.

If know this monk is fraudulent, tell us the story. Otherwise, stop B/S'ing. As far as I know, he was a sad case of media manipulation.

[apanakjadi28]

FYI too Uncle Lenny, the same guy who exposed him was the same guy who made him a legend. So, tell us what was/were the problem(s) between them.

[lennyhipp]

"So, tell us what was/were the problem(s) between them."

don't know... but what i do know is there is photos of nessie that were proven fraud, there is films of bigfoot that were fraud, there's scores of UFOs but no proof... having a grainy old video is NOT proof this guy could stand on one finger!

[apanakjadi28]

Oh!Uncle Lenny, you begin to babble like a cornered conman.

[lennyhipp]

"Show us how and provide us the necessary links."

one of the many things on my list of things to do... sorry the truth isn't coming as quickly as you would like!

"the same guy who exposed him was the same guy who made him a legend"

yes, and if i was making the film, i'd want to make sure there wasn't any doubt: I'd show him getting into position, i'd show others in the room to prove it wasn't upside down, i'd pan around the body to prove no wires, etc.

[apanakjadi28]

Oh!Uncle Lenny! You are no better than a charlatan.

All I asked for was a simple URL to your allegations. You couldn't.

Instead your reply show more of your ignorance of this monk. Your last para "yes, and if i was making...prove no wires, etc." shows that you are an utter idiot. FYI, The monk was exposed about 9 years after he made him legend. Want more about him? Show us the URL first.

[gordonwww]

very deep kungfu

[kaizen5023]

O_O amazing...

[TheOtherChris]

Shaolin finger jab! Further on in the full video, he is asked to try out a punching bag. Instead of punching it, he makes a hole in it with his pinky. D:!

[CrAzYpotpie]

Amazingly Amazing.

[sstraub]

Incredible

[theshadowboy607]

respect

[kikich]

.o_o.

[ratten123]

respect

[RbG999]

Shaolin forever