Added: 4 years ago
From: whynut
Views: 3,342
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Again, DNA has eliminated these people. I used to think Patsy was involved years ago. I now strongly lean towards their innocence.

  • Comment removed

  • @peteyguitarguy

    eliminated? lol...

    you dumb people pisses me off.....just because they found years later that degraded DNA, wha tis a partial and never will be match anybody. This fucking DNA could be from anyone..from the investigators police, friends...i mean..the ramseys and the police messed up, the whole crime scene.

    And of course the DNA from the ramseys were all over the place!! 1. it was their home..2. he messed up the crime scene with his DNA after he found her,on purpose i believe.

  • How can anyone honestly think the parents are innocent. They are so guilty is sickining.

  • The ransom note named John and knew he was from the south. How could the intruder (if there was one) not know the Ramseys personally?

  • I don't believe for a second that the parents killed her. Everyone locks in on someone and then there's tunnel vision. Are they professional killers where no one could find evidence. JonBenet and her Mom are together now, the person or persons who did this, they'll be punished for it. Caught 5 yrs 10 yrs ect from now or not , they wont escape punishment.....it's patiently waiting.

  • The people that come on here and attempt to state that the parents had nothing to do with this murder of this poor child just make me understand that not all humans are born equal and im just extremly relieved that im one of the humans at the top of the food chain who can see things for what they are, Burke or Patsy Ramsey killed Jon Benet and John helped cover it up. I have spoken

  • john says he cant imagine that they knew the killer, but they named neighbours and friends as possible suspects, so if he doesnt think they would have known such an evil killer, then why did they name close friends. i really think there are lies here

  • @NicolaMG no you and a few others misunderstood the situation. the Boulder police ask the Ramseys for list of their friends and neighbors. the police had to consider everyone as potential suspects and narrow it down.

    the Ramseys just wanted to solve this crime against their daughter. it was only after their attorneys advise them not to grant police interviews that they shy away from that.

  • @dhom100 But it was the police who could find and catch the killer, not attorney. The attorney was only to protect them of being killers. So it seems that the parents were more interested to protect themselves than to find who killed their daughters. Why they only believe that their attorney was doing his job fairly (since they followed his advice) and the police not?! They did not believe in the police and in the media, but they did believe in the attorney and their appearance in the TV!

  • @dianabxh you misunderstood what I said. yes it's up to police to catch the killer but their attorneys advise them the police were not interested in looking for other suspects. Boulder police already considered the

    Ramseys as prime suspects. but the Ramseys knew they didn't do it and they wanted desperately to find their daughter's killer and a killer is running loose on the streets. They hired their own private

    investigator. I'd do the same thing if it was me.

  • @dhom100 How the attorney knew that the police were not looking for other suspects? Or if it was so, the police did not decide that they were the killers. The police only could press charges against them. A trail would decided if they were innocents or killers. Since they were innocent, they voluntary could asked to be questioned by the police in the presence of their attorney.and not to refuse b/s the police didn't accept their conditions for a doctor and private investigators.

  • @dhom100 Did the police prod the door, or John had the key? Did the private investigators found the killer? Do you think this murder seems as the Boston strangler case? The killer strangles the victims with a cord, and a fake killer accepts the crime. Both crimes are unresolved.

  • @dianabxh this case has nothing to do with the Boston strangler case which is a very old case. their private investigator theorize that the killer hid in the house when they went to the Christmas party. it was a kidnapping that went wrong when JonBenet woke up and scream in the basement. a neighbor heard a child screaming late that night. police just blew it off. panicking, the killer choked her and hit her head and ran off through the broken window in the basement.

  • @dhom100 The parents are the primary suspects because the crime happened in their house. Why the police were wrong here? Why they could have been wright if the primary suspect would have been a mystery intruder who entered in the house from an unsecured window and door, did the crime, closed the door (because the police couldn't opened it) and left the house quietly without his suitcase, but leaving it as the only evidence (I do not think he was aware of his footprint on the mold)

  • Come on John,haven't we all suffered enough?

    Just admit to it,and stop wasting people's time.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more