Added: 3 years ago
From: ft790
Views: 61,475
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3,874)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I know i am sooo late responding, but i want to say thank you. I stopped trying to pick a side at 7 yrs old. Anyone who makes you choose one thing out of many things that make you, is not worthy of your company :) thanks for the comment and compliment!!

  • Looking at the comments.

    I think we still have some intermediates between Bacteria and Apes

  • if you READ (past tense folks) THE Babble, you will NOTE that GOD I A RAPIST who never paid for his VIRGIN, she was left to live with a bastard child alone, and someone ELSE married her to raise IT, why then did a law be written by the same "god" that ANY WHO RAPE A VIRGIN..which was ACCEPTABLE...must pay her father sum sheckles and marry the VICTIM. HE (your stupid ass GOD) is a CRIMINAL AND THUS FOUND ON DEATH ROW MOSTLY! sick, the babble is just SICK! psalm 128...bash your baby into a wall!HA

  • @SinnersBurnInHell you're a troll channel. i can tell by your username. you're actually a very good troll you act sooo stupid i actually believed you were a real christian.

  • the first word of the comments is god... i stopped reading after i saw that..

  • @gazzthompson actually, it's a theory stupid! Reason being it's lacking facts. The day it's a fact or proven, it will no longer be a theory.

  • @jct09100 just like the "theory of gravity" or the "theory of relativity". it's just a theory!!!!!!!!!!!

  • This video is proof of why the evolution myth is imaginary. . "perhaps this happened, I suppose that happened"...This is not science, this is nothing short of storytelling.

  • @fellowservant34 "nothing short of storytelling."

    Like religion.

  • @fellowservant34 unlike the bible which says the earth was DEFINITELY made in 6 days! the bible now tht is a story book!

    understand he is condensing millions of years into 3 minutes. wot evidence do we have for the bible's version of life on earth? which doesnt mention dinosaurs in the six days of creation (oh they only occupied the earth for about a billion years) u are a complete mong

  • @fellowservant34 Evolution is beyond discussion now, its true whether you like it or not. Although I have no idea why kids like you dislike it so much, disproving it would only lead to more questions as to where we came from, and prove nothing.

  • I cant belive the low IQ that audience displays by applauding this fool who just pissed his pants jibber jabbering that nonsense.. LOL

  • @jct09100 you're a fuckin' idiot. period. just because you can't understand something doesn't make it nonsense.

  • He didnt even explain how amoeba evolved into one other cell let alone how it evolved into every living creature. Stuttering fool.. Lol suppose this suppose that.. What he really means is that science doesnt know

  • Gotta love "the next stage might be..." "perhaps"... "probably"... "may have"... Maybe this, maybe that... Thats a mouthful of bull shit. The term science means knowledge, not the lack thereof. Science doesnt know. It's just a bunch of suppositions. Unproven claims.

  • @jct09100 Evolution is a fact. Get over it.

  • @jct09100 and wot do you believe? six days of creation? noahs ark? get educated and do the math. science knows how to make a computer and invent youtube! go back to the stone age and worship some made up invisible magic man

  • @shieldsff, ethics, metaphysics and morality are all derived from the wide subject matter of philosophy, and while there may be some semblance of science in each, these studies are all mainly social in nature. You cannot possibly sit there and tell me you can compare ethics, morality and metaphysics with biology, geology and astronomy in regards to the scientific method.

  • @Bill2Wheeler That's is not true. Who do you get your science info from, Kent Hovind?

  • Please excuse me while I dance.

  • I want for a day when people can actually come on here and discuss evolution and aspects of it and not just goddite slime desperately trying to preserve their make believe ideology.

  • Today the top paleontologists have admitted that the fossil record does not reflect a slow progression of evolution. Rather they see what they call “Emergence.” This means that whole new populations of different forms of life pop up suddenly. If Mr. Dawkins wants to be taken seriously, he needs to drop the Neo-Darwinian model and follow the evidence.

  • @Bill2Wheeler

    It's called punctuated equilibrium... in contrast to phyletic gradualism.

    From what i've heard in Dawkins debates, he accepts phyletic gradualism to happen uniformly for all biological things. But also recognize that evolution can follow the model of punctuated equilibrium, given the right environment and genetic pressures.

    The neo darwinian model is the modern evolutionary model...essentially, depending on how you define the term.

  • @DataSe7en

    Punctuated equilibrium happens in a stable environment without much extra-species competition. You can imagine the environment (including prey and predators) as a moving curved surface with hills and valleys, and individual species as marbles that roll down those hills to evolve. Sometimes a marble will settle in a valley (let's call it being crocodilian at a riverbank). There's no direction to evolve in which is an improvement from there, until the environment changes.

  • @rkyeun

    I don't understand the point of your comment.

    and no , it does not need to happen in a stable environment... the environment could change, the adapted species might also be adapted to the new environment... thus exhibiting little evolutionary change.

  • @DataSe7en

    You said it could happen in the right environment.

    I was expounding on that and giving an example.

    Yes, you're right about an organism who coincidentally happens to be suitable for a different environment as well making that switch.

  • @Bill2Wheeler Red Queen Hypothesis explains those sudden shifts in the fossil record. Hosts and parasites in a continuous arms race - host evolves resistance, then after X number of years, parasite overcomes resistance. Response? Host evolves.

  • What strikes me about this video is how many times Mr. Dawkins says “might be,” or “something like,” referring to possible worms or fish which developed from lower forms of lifeWhy does the top voice for Darwinian belief, have to resort to “might be,” and “something like?” If Darwinian evolution is a true empirical science one would expect to hear concrete scientific evidence. Dawkins however, just as Darwin before him, assumes that the evidence exists.

  • @Bill2Wheeler

    It's called intellectual honesty.

  • Dawkins might be satisfied with an ape for a grandma, but I'm not.

  • @IamMarsLion Your level of satisfaction does not make facts any less factual.

  • @IamMarsLion

    Tough. Your literal grandma literally is a literal ape, along with all other hominids and including yourself. Whether you're satisfied with it has no bearing on the matter. It is true.

  • I've heard some scientific rumours on the internets that state Richard Dawkins is a "gay homo erection", basically a mutation evolution between "flying sea monkey" and "four headed banana" (aka "the atheist's nightmare") according to some factual evolution data, this happened somewhere around 999 billions years ago where bananas eats atheists for breakfast

    Bottom line, you don't listen to a crazy old faggot like Dawkins !!!

  • and million years ago where was the bacteria from? ..a rock.. a water?... dead material will never transform to life organism, richard:0 bible:1

  • @kissmyfucknasshole How do you know that? Do you have any proof of that? People use to explain things they don't understand with religious belifes, and always has been.

  • This man needs prayer.....I will pray he wakes up and comes to know his saviour.

  • @gthbf1 you're a fuckin' idiot. Do you personally know you're savior you feeble-minded buffoon? Have you actually met god. Actually, let me re-phrase that...is there any evidence to prove god ever even existed in the first place, because that blasphemy you call a bible is just a fairytale book of theories made up by a bunch of uneducated imaginative individuals. FACTS OVER BELIEFS.

  • @avaggggg25 Yes i saw him personally. Jesus is alive. Bible is no fairytale buddy its a history book. You can walk through the ruins of Sodom and Gomorrah, picking up balls of sulpher (brimstone) as you go. I have also seen demonic spirits too, so i assume that Hell is real. I would be very surprised if it wasn't. You have to make up your mind in life, who you will follow and where you will go.

  • @SinnersBurnInHell pedo supporter or not it is still one of the largest religious organisations, for an entire denomination to accept it as fact ther is clearly more evidence for evolution.

  • @SinnersBurnInHell why dont you accept he clearly has read the bible and has pointed out 40 or so contradictions from the bible you said its accuracy cannot be questioned explain that

  • @SinnersBurnInHell thats not how evolution works,when all natural predators are removed thr is nothing driving evolution, take the catipillas that mimic a snakes appearance that was a sucesful mutation that made the birds(natural predator) ignore them and eat all the ones that didnt look like snakes so they didnt breed anymore next thing ya know all that breed of catapilla looks like snakes because it provided an evolutionary advantage, natural selection, we dont have predators

  • @666Sanshou

    predatory pressure isn't the only thing driving evolution.

    Natural selection (predators, etc)

    Random Mutation

    Genetic Drift

  • @DataSe7en no but predators are the reason our evolution has slowed by comparison to other animals of the world, many influences such as enviromental have little effect on our ability to survive

  • @SinnersBurnInHell Evoloution is real god created everything including evolution, The bible is not to be taken literally, All christians will eventually accept the fact of evolution and applaud the lord for his amazing creation.

  • @SinnersBurnInHell Looks like someone just got owned.

  • @SinnersBurnInHell Amen to that brother, too many stubborn christians are staring gods amazing work in the face Evolution! yet because of scriptural misunderstandings are being blind

  • @SinnersBurnInHell Counting tree rings Dendrochronology gives a ring for every season giving a total amount of years this technique alone with no complicated science gives us 10,000yrs alone, even the pope declared evolution a fact and apopgised for jailing galileo for proving the earth is not fixed that it revolves the sun not the other way round as bible describes, taking it literally to be against even in the mountain of evidence of the miracles of evolution gives christians a bad name

  • @keliangarcia does the bible really claim that the earth is fixed?

  • @SinnersBurnInHell God is not everywhere present, neither sees nor knows all thingsGen 11:5/ Gen 18:20,21/ Gen 3:8 God knows the hearts of men Acts 1:24/ Ps 139:2,3 God tries men to find out what is in their heart Deut 13:3/ Deut 8:2/ Gen 22:12 God is all powerfulJer 32:27/ Matt 19:26God is not all powerfulJudg 1:1 the list goes on so what do you say about accuracy now? the gospels for example are ppls accounts 2 ppl see an event have differnt views-fact, the bible is a guide not encylcopedia

  • @SinnersBurnInHell the world is a not 6000yrs old you can count the generations in the bible but that is distorted we know neanderthal primitive humans couldnt write, big bang made the universe and evolution was the seed of life god created, taking the bible literally is foolish it was not gods intention.God is tired and restsEx 31:17God is never tired and never restsIs 40:28God is everywhere present, sees and knows all thingsProv 15:3/ Ps 139:7-10/ Job 34:22,21, thr is hundreds of these

  • @SinnersBurnInHell you transformed from a single cell into an animal in 9months the miracle of birth, imagine what a few hundred million years could do with a single cell

  • @SinnersBurnInHell That isn't at all what evolution is. I don't understand why people like you don't do some simple research before talking. You must be a relative of Ray Cloud.

  • @SinnersBurnInHell do you not believe in the possibility of transforming from a single cell into an animal?

  • @SinnersBurnInHell No, it is not.

  • @SinnersBurnInHell no, but if that happens, this would be a case to DISPROVE evolution. Evolution speaks against a monkey giving birth to a modern man. If you ever see one, let us know, you can use that to disprove evolution.

  • @SinnersBurnInHell Learn about speciation and common ancestry before making idiotic comments like that.

  • @SinnersBurnInHell No, why in the world would they?

  • @SinnersBurnInHell You`re the living prove that it also works the other way around...

  • human idiocy and ignorance....one trait of primitive intelligence that should disappear as humans get smarter over time....thus evolution.

  • just lemme ask a question >>> why we dont see nowadays some kinds of this bacteria or while its developing !! why there is nothin shows that its ture !! i believe in (allah) and his prophet mohammed pbuh

  • @laior Evolution takes time, of course we wouldn't see this over just a few generations. But as for changes in bacteria, we can see that with bacteria mutating to fight antibiotics. That's why you shouldn't take too much antibiotics cos the bacteria may get a chance to mutate so the antibiotics wouldn't effect it. That of course isn't evolution but it is a step towards evolving.

  • @saumyab44 ofc i didnt say over a few generations ... but if its ture that it happened .. so it wont end !! there is no clue that its ture .. bacteria developed .. so if its ture why there r no more bacteria it another shape whichs b4 apes still developing ... its not logical dude !! there is god !

  • @laior Intermediates usually failed to adapt the way the current species have. Thus they generally die off. This is not always true though but with many species its why many of the fossils we have that have no living members of that species went extinct. They failed to adapt or some catastrophic event happened. I sure hope English is a second language for you.

  • @laior Research nylon eating bacteria. Since you are asking about bacteria, look that up. Nylon was invented in I believe the 1940s... so how could bacteria that only eats nylon survive for that long, without it's food source? Scientists were able to cause bacteria to evolve that way again by taking bacteria and putting it in a nylon rich environment, and the same mutation occurred where it ate the nylon.

  • @laior I have no idea what you just said, so I'm going to leave it there.

  • @saumyab44 the transformation from a single cell into an animal may have taken millions of years initially, but from a single cell to an animal only took me and every other human 9months!!!!

  • Comment removed

  • @keliangarcia Ya i know that. Sorry if I said something that sounded like I didn't.

  • @saumyab44 the lenski evoloution experiment with E coli is amazing E coli devolped an ability to use citrate when totally isolated, read up on it it is a much more powerful argument than antibiotic resistance although much the same:)

  • @keliangarcia Ok thanks I will :). 

  • Very informative and interesting. Richard Dawkins is able to make very complex subject simple and easy to understand.

  • Sounded like a great pokemon master which have almost had his pokedex completed.

  • after watching this video I now believe that richard Dawkin's grand daddy was certainly an ape.

  • @rizwank1 and you must be a monkey, because apes are way smarter than you

  • @rizwank1 Yet man does recognise himself [as an animal]. But I ask you and the whole world for a generic differentia between man and ape which conforms to the principles of natural history, I certainly know of none... If I were to call man ape or vice versa, I should bring down all the theologians on my head. But perhaps I should still do it according to the rules of science.

    — Carolus Linnaeus

    Letter to Johann Gmelon (14 Jan 1747),

  • why is every jesus freak over reacting to evolution?

  • i'm a bloody reptilian you wanker!!!!!!!!!

  • /watch?v=ohp4dmkOmKE&feature=f­eedrec

    i canot post all my question here so i post a youtube link... if any evolutionist or atheist answer me this questions with cientific explanations i will belive in evolution

    PEacE :D

  • @pinadeiro 1. We do not know how gravity "started" does that make that void? Also we can simulate early earth and create 2 RNA sequences. Closer than you think.

    2. I could just do this: the end. Is it a language that can be read? Does it have a real "purpose"?

    3. "Vast majority" LOLOLOL. No, not a vast majority at all, plants, fungi, bacteria... Simple Google answer... tsk tsk. No they did not need both at the same time.

    4. You're retarded if you think nothing comes close. We had time to become

  • @pinadeiro the smartest of the world, agriculture, less energy on walking ect. NO. SECOND SMARTEST IS ORANGUTAN, DOLPHINS ALSO POSSIBLY. 4 million years between chimp and man.

    5. No, dolphins, octopus and the cuddle fish, whales, most (or all) apes, and bacteria have, or can learn a language.

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO­LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

  • @SorryStamin fail

  • @pinadeiro

    watch thelivingdinosaur.

    /user/TheLivingDinosaur

  • @pinadeiro you misspelled "I'm a retard"

  • @SorryStamin dont worry, i dont judge people like that.. you are happy arent you

  • @pinadeiro After that laugh, yes.

  • @pinadeiro After that laugh, yes. Very much

  • @SorryStamin

    what the hell are you trying to do?

  • @minderbart1 I don't know. Laughing at idiots I suppose.

  • Richard you left out the Cambrian radiation event which some including many of the Chinese who have the best preserved Cambrian record say took as little as three million years, and C value enigma which states that there is no way to genetically determine an organisms complexity. The message here is that time is the magic competent. Anyone over forty knows that time is not on your side.

  • weird...apes didnt evolve into humans.. not sure why he said that..

    anyone have an idea?

  • @Dymdez Chimps are always considered the ancestors in millions of biology textbooks but due to the unexpected results of studies by Krings et al, and the following studies that confirmed it, proving that chimps and neanderthals mtDNA fall way outside the human mtDNA, evolutionists now put chimps and neanderthals as cousins to humans, meaning chimps didnt evolve into humans but from common apelike ancestor which is nowhere to be found. Evolutionists kept on changing positions as a strategy.

  • @Dymdez it depends on your perception of the word "ape" he didn't mean monkeys or modern apes, he means the primate ancestors or the "great apes" technically humans are apes if I'm not mistaken and I think that's where the whole "We are all Africans" thing comes from, that we're all descended from african apes.

  • bacteria turn into apes, turning into humans... bacteria worked together to form... sponges, then into sea anemones, then into a worm, then into a fish... emerge from water to land...but we still have bacteria, and worms, and apes, and we have... humans...

  • @relcychoho

    "but we still have bacteria, and worms, and apes, and we have... humans..."

    yeah well, americans are descendants of europeans but there are still europeans.

    how's that? because NOT EVERY european went to america.

    just like not every species branched of.

    when the environment favor's a species it will not evolve so fast.

    like crocodiles, which didn't change much over the coarse of history. they DID change BUT not much.

  • @TheoryIsSpeculation

    "I don't have to prove it, you already have for me. "

    wow you are really good in pwning yourself.

  • Watch on YouTube:" What Would Dawkins Say to This! "

    Dawkins stop spreading lies!

  • @hibiscusfire

    stop changing the subject

  • @minderbart1 Stop lying.

  • @hibiscusfire

    where did i lie?

  • @minderbart1 Stop lying that evolution is true. You are spreading vicious lies and corrupting the children into hateful monkeys. You know like the ones in Jumanji.

  • @hibiscusfire

    "hateful monkeys"

    forgot about this one.

    ever seen a monkey hanging around in drugs gangs do you?

    you don't see a monkey strapping some guy to a chair and hooking up his balls to a car battery do you?

    when is the last monkey you heard about came home from work and beat the shit out of his mate? huh?

    doesn't happen. because monkey's are decent people.

  • @minderbart1 So from monkeys you evolved from a decent person to a hateful men and women. So sad.

  • @minderbart1 Check God and He will teach you the truth

  • @hibiscusfire

    i did and he told me you are a lier 

  • @hibiscusfire Just learn some fact's instead of making yourself look a big fat twat

  • @novalution86 Is that how you feel? Well first of all "evolved" people shouldn't be calling any one names...wait I forgot, evolution don't teach you about manners, love or respect, it's God who does all that. Face it, we are lost without God.

  • @hibiscusfire i was brought up christian, kinda shits on your theory huh?

  • @novalution86 Obviously you were not paying attention and that is why you are the way you are now - unmannerly and obnoxious. That's is very sad for you. Not everyone who says they are "christian" are christians. Christians love Jesus and follow Him. What kind of "christian" were you?? A false one? God is real. That is a fact not a theory.

  • @hibiscusfire More like obviously i was paying attention...but i'll give you a chance to prove to me god is real, just please no bible references as it's not evidence.

  • @novalution86 I don't have to prove anything to you. God has proven Himself to you time and time again but you turn away.

  • @hibiscusfire

    " Not everyone who says they are "christian" are christians."

    no true Scotsman fallacy

  • @minderbart1 dude that guy is never gonna understand that evolution is/was always happening, unfortunatly people like this think of it in the same context as a religion (you belive or you dont).

  • @novalution86

    i know, but i can't stand people spouting bullshit.

  • @minderbart1 you mean like yourself. Oh my!

  • @hibiscusfire

    no i have a shitload of evidence behind me, while you have only your faith.

  • @minderbart1 You have a scientific philosophy, but all the evidence for evolution is based on a tenuous model. When evolutionary theory is submitted to genuine scientific scrutiny, it comes out unproven. Evolutionists can ONLY say what they believed took place in the development of life forms. Evolution is a fairy tale for grown ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless. PROF. LOUIS BOUNOURE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH NCSR

  • @logicnreason1

    "When evolutionary theory is submitted to genuine scientific scrutiny, it comes out unproven."

    bullshit!.

    there are thousands of scientific pier reviewed papers on the mechanisms of evolution.

    "This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."

    vaccines ring a bell? what about genetic failures?

    you make a really outlandish claim, care to back it up?

  • @logicnreason1

    "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless. PROF. LOUIS BOUNOURE DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH NCSR"

    lying for jesus makes me sad.

    A man named E.T. Babinski actually contacted French authorities. They revealed that Louis Bounoure never served as Director or even a member of the CNRS. He was a professor of biology at the University of Strasbourg. Bounoure was a Christian ...

  • @logicnreason1

    .... but did not affirm that Genesis was to be taken to the letter.

    The beginning of the quotation, "Evolution is a fairy tale for adults" is not from Bounoure but adapted from Jean Rostand, a member of the Academy of Sciences of the French Academy. Rostand also wrote that "Transformism may be considered as accepted, and no scientist, no philosopher, no longer discusses the fact of evolution." (L'Evolution des Especes [i.e., The Evolution of the Species], Hachette, p. 190).

  • @hibiscusfire Shut up.

  • @yoshiguy123 are you evolved bacteria? Then what exactly do I need to shut? You need to go find some ape friends and reason with them that they came from bacteria. Then tell then to shut up. See what they will do to you. By the way don't forget they are 98% human so you should feel comfortable talking to them and telling them to shut up when they growl at you. Go try it. I dare you.

  • @hibiscusfire Shut up.

  • @yoshiguy123 lol you didn't find any ape friends did you? Go look again. They are waiting for you.

  • @hibiscusfire Shut up.

  • @yoshiguy123 What a pity that your language is only limited to insults. There goes your evolved mind. lol!

  • @hibiscusfire Shut up.

  • @yoshiguy123 After you. :)

  • @hibiscusfire Shut up.

  • @yoshiguy123 You didn't evolve properly. Go learn some english. 

  • @hibiscusfire Shut up.

  • @hibiscusfire

    "lol you didn't find any ape friends did you?"

    humans are apes.

    "evolution don't teach you about manners, love or respect, it's God who does all that."

    inquisition, crusades, conquistador's, ww2 etc.

    yep love and respect. GTFO!

  • @minderbart1 find out the truth before posting lies ok

  • @minderbart1 You need to research on those inquisition, crusades, conquistador's a little bit more before you cast stones.

  • @hibiscusfire

    why?

  • @minderbart1 because it has nothing to do with the real believers of God

  • @hibiscusfire

    no true scottsman fallacy

  • @minderbart1 You need to find out the truth man.

  • @hibiscusfire

    i do know the truth, the great flying spaghetti monster is everywhere.

  • @TheoryIsSpeculation

    "You're the liar!"

    prove it!

  • @TheoryIsSpeculation

    yeah sure, like that stupid site you pm'd me?

    do you even have a response to that?

  • @TheoryIsSpeculation

    "Francis Crick"

    was indeed a honest man, unlike you, because he admitted he did not no how life got started.

    BUT, that has nothing to do with evolution.

  • 3:15 he said "We don't know how they grew hair"

    wow just wow.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @xbroadcaster1991 he actually says 'we don't know IF they grew hair'

  • @northeasthaza from where did hair come from then? why can't atheists have a firm theory to back their immorality.

  • @xbroadcaster1991 Actually he said "They may have grown hair at this stage, we don't know weither they grew hair at this stage."

  • @MIDDAYAJ52 why doesn't he know that? how can he back his atheism with such a bad knowledge

  • @xbroadcaster1991 Because hair doesn't fossilize. Bones do. Richard Dawkins is an atheist but thats not what he is trying to prove. Evolution is what he is trying to show to everyone is true. And he has mounds of evidence for that.

  • @MIDDAYAJ52 From where did the very first bacteria come from? Bible says all the creature began from water. Who is that contradicting evolution.

  • @xbroadcaster1991 Well chemical molecule bonded together and made cells and then it went on from there. And the bible says that? I really don't know but my understanding was that the bible said that man was just created by god. Seems to me if it says that all creatures began in water that the bible was supporting evolution.

  • @xbroadcaster1991

    "From where did the very first bacteria come from?"

    easiest answer? we don't know, but that does NOT invalidate evolution.

    "Bible says all the creature began from water."

    where does it state that? I've read the bible i haven't found anything like that.

  • @minderbart1 Both Bible and Koran have verses that explain the origin of creatures from water.

  • @xbroadcaster1991

    where?

  • @minderbart1 ask anyone at yahoo answers.