@samann95014 well, we know exactly where a shit ton of gold and metals are closeby in our own solar system...
you have to realize that this entire commodities market we have at the moment is but an inflated farce... we have the technology to actually get more resources than 20 billion humans could use in a century by just hauling one medium sized asteroid from the kuiper belt... one of billions...
question is who has the means and the balls to do it first...
how does it detect chrome and manganese? Emission or absorption spectroscopy presumably. Tenuous metal-vapor cloud obscuring known star types ... that's not absorption spectroscopy necessarily .. I gather this chrome cloud supports electrical discharges the colors bare the tell-tale chrome (and manganese) spectra. I guess we could google deeper on this particular orbiting telescope.
thinking we need to to get out there and do what we do best,,,before we start fighting over whats left to use up here.,,,Whoops seems we already are, have, and will ...Shame ,,,such a wonderfull species,,,
Yes and it is so simple yet elegantly done. Simply by splitting light with a prism and analyzing the missing wave lengths we can see what elements it has passed through, since all elements absorb light differently.
Stars emit light and heat as a result of fusion reactions. When the fusion reactions reach the element iron (Fe), the star explodes with a supernova. So, how do we get the elements bigger than iron on the periodic table? This is a question that does not jive with supernova cosmology. Supernovas are a process of energy transformation but they do not explain the creation of large elements. How are these elements formed? Obviously I'm aware that Cr and Mn occur just before Fe on the periodic table.
@SacreDro It's interesting because like 99% of the universe is made up of hydrogen and helium (very light and simple elements). Chromium is a heavy and complex element and is very rarely found in high quantity at one corner of the universe.
Technically, all that we can see; Planets, asteroids, stars, nebulae, comets, Hydrogen, Helium, and dust; Only makes up 5% of the total mass in the universe.
The other 95% is unknown. Comprised of the 'stuff' that we call darkmatter, and darkenergy.
@SacreDro Chromium is most widely known for its use in chrome plating and in the creation of alloys like stainless steel and high-heat-resistant nickel alloys. It is also used in various pigments for paint (i.e. chrome red, chrome yellow).
However, the point of the video was not how great it is that there is so much chrome in another galaxy, but how strange it is that is so much of a relatively rare element in that galaxy cluster.
@gachman just like a stupid ju to think he can build something bigger then storage shed. we are humans and this idiot thinks people can build a star, it might be joke but IT IS his state of mind, humans are slowly dieing off because of the antics of economical and social stratification only intended to help inferior gene (jews) to survive.american kids are fat and ugly yet over confindent ? how does that work?
Jews are bad for human evolution. tie their tubes, cut testies not foreskin.
Why can't people just enjoy an educational video without writing comments to try and prove how smart they are and boost their egos? If you're so smart, why watch what you already know? Particularly Mr. Whitestar
@SolidGaby I like too think that too. The Chromium were the residue left after billions of spaceships exploded in an extreme extraterrestrial war! That would be freakin' awesome! >:D
Yes, that would never happen; it is ridiculous to believe such a thing.
I am talking to you, Hawking.
As for ancient astronauts, steer well clear of that. Ever see people going on about Reptilians/Reptoids/Annunaki? That is one of the craziest conspiracy theories there are.
Think of the "NWO" conspiracy theory, the FEMA camps, freemasons, Illuminati, mole people, shadow government, etc etc etc.
True, but why bother when there is one readymade? You only need look at human history to see what happens when advanced civilisations meet ones that are less so. There is no reason to assume extraterrestrials would behave any differently.
Yes, there is. Notice how it has been the most aggressive and violent societies that behaved like that.
And notice how short-lived such societies tend to be.
As Sagan said, a society advanced enough to build a starship of such a scale is necessarily socially developed enough to behave far better than the Inquisition.
Actually it lasted longer than most, and so far, a lot longer than modern civilisation. And in the time scales of our species there haven't been many of what can be classified as civilisations at all. War can garner the co-operation needed to construct massive star ships, just look at the advances made during World War 2. To suggest that this hypothetical advanced alien race would be automatically benign is naive to say the least.
"Actually it lasted longer than most, and so far, a lot longer than modern civilisation."
So? That is a far cry from the time required to advance to the level required to behave like in Independence Day.
And why would war create the building of starships? What use is a starship in a war?
A starship requires global cooperation to build. Thus such a civilization would have already learned to move past the sectarianism and so on that the invasion idea is founded on.
I’m beginning to think you’re deliberately misinterpreting what I’m saying? If this advanced alien civilisation exists, there is absolutely no reason that there can’t be more than one and thus these races will have encountered each other at some point. No doubt, as it is here on Earth, they will occasionally have disagreements which escalate to war. The notion that we will all just get along is laughable and to be honest so is this conversation, cont..
The name is a dig at organised religion. I’ve already explained how you misinterpreted me. If they do exist; this “unification” you’re talking about can be born out of an, us and them mentality if other advanced races exist. Have you considered your assumptions are based on idealism rather than realism? And seriously, this is all speculation. We don’t even know that such life exists.
Plus there is the possibility that we are one of, if not the most advanced civilisation in the universe. I don't like discussions based on pure speculation, they come down to opinion rather than evidence and can go on forever.
OK, I see the point you are trying to make, but why would a society have learned to put aside their own differences - necessary to build such a ship (do you really think humans could do it today, even if you had the technology?) - yet simultaneously not be able to get past the differences between species?
And yes, you do not know that such life exists. But considering the numbers, it is extremely likely that it does.
As things stand today, yes. I think we could easily construct a star ship. With the current state of propulsion technology however, it would be pointless. We could easily build the ship, but it won’t go anywhere in a hurry. So the will to do it just isn’t there. We are advancing nicely at the moment, despite the obvious division in the world, and I don't see that changing. Don’t forget the differences between us and species from another planet will be far more radical.
They could be an affront to everything we stand for, or vice versa. To assume they would be friendly without checking first would be extremely short sighted and naive. Don’t forget in diplomacy, it can be very useful to speak softly but wield a big stick. ; )
How? Such a project would cost trillions of dollars or more. And it would require decades worth of resources. No one nation - hell, no one CONTINENT could do it alone.
The LHC didn't cost trillions of dollars. There are asteroids made of near pure iron and other useful metals. The obstacle to space exploration isn’t human resources. It’s technological. If we had much better propulsion, space exploration would take off. The entire world’s co-operation isn’t needed, and when the time comes, won’t be needed. But as things stand, the will to do it just isn’t there.
We are not talking about the LHC. We are talking about a starship large enough to hold thousands or millions of people. A starship the size of a small city.
Why would it need to hold thousands or millions? Its purpose would be for interstellar travel, and its success would be defined by its speed, not its carrying capacity.
The original purpose was to either invade or steal the resources of the entire planet, remember?
And do you have any idea how much it costs to lift things into orbit? To lift one kilogram into orbit, it costs about the same as to buy of a kilogram of solid gold.
I'm talking about us. And you start off small, when technology and manufacturing improve, you build bigger. Meaning, there is no need to spend trillions of dollars on one ship.
But those small ships could never be of the kind required for the goal we were originally discussing. As I have said numerous times, it would take cooperation that humans do not yet have to build such a ship. And that the acquisition of such cooperation need not be restricted to one's own species, and there is no evidence that it will.
You're just not getting me. I'm not saying we will conquer other planets. It will take thousands of years before we have that kind of technology and by that stage will have already occupied many star systems. The idea all of humanity and their different ideologies will be required to advance to this level is ridiculous. It will just take one ideology to accomplish this. The rest can do what they like and be left behind.
It’s a gradual process, and I can guarantee you violence will still be in us. This doesn’t mean we will subjugate any we come across, but wars will not be beyond us. The same will go for any other civilisations that may be out there. Just because they are advanced doesn’t mean they won’t turn nasty given the right circumstances.
Colonise uninhabited star systems, not conquer an already advanced race. You don’t need to terraform a planet to have a presence in a star system. It’s a possibility the Earth will be in demand. It is also possible we just won’t like each other. I keep saying, there is absolutely no reason to think their behaviour will be any different to ours and our behaviour will not need to change for us to become seriously advanced.
@jedisenior Well to be honest we have no idea what to do in such a circumstance, so when beginning relations, we would on the whole should try to be peaceful unless circumstance dictates otherwise. Aka We will be passive initially
Agreed, caution is advised. As many have said, we should keep our heads down for the moment. As things stand, we wouldn't have a hope. Even as we advance and begin to explore the galaxy, caution would be advised. I’m not advocating war. I’m just pointing out that it is naive to assume that a species way more advanced than us must be peaceful.
I hope you’re wrong, but the way things are going you might be right. Initial estimates said we should have been to Mars by now, progress seems to have halted. The will to explore just isn’t there anymore. It’s hard to be optimistic when you look at current events.
Recall the fact that all extraterrestrial life would be radically different in nature from the life here - so different that nothing here could be used to draw conclusions about the nature of this other civilization. Nothing.
Now what evidence do you have that they are hostile?
None, that’s my whole point, but all we have to draw from is our behaviour and history. We can’t assume anything. Just as we can’t assume that they being more advanced than us will make them friendly. Some may be friendly; others not so much, I’ve already stated this, look back through the comments. I also stated there is no evidence that there is any intelligent life to begin with.
But you cannot draw from your behavior and history. That would be like studying the history of some random animal and drawing conclusions about the future behavior of humans.
Actually, no, this is even more removed than that.
Your point is? I've already said this. We are advancing just nicely despite the world being as violent and divided as it ever was. This idea that worldwide consensus will be required for us to achieve interstellar travel is idiotic. If this is what we’re waiting for, we will never leave this rock; it’s as simple as that. And none of this proves that these hypothetical advanced races will be friendly, simply because they’re more advanced than us.
One, the world is not "as violent and divided as it ever was".
That is an illusion, created by two main mechanisms. One, increased reporting. Thirty years ago a scuffle in the Middle East went unnnoticed; now it is headline news. And technology has increased the death toll from hostilities of scales no larger than that of the past.
Two, the lack of proof of their friendliness is not proof of their hostility. As I am sure you know.
One) I would argue that the basic nature of the human race has not changed in the last hundred years. The only reason the death toll hasn't increased is nobody has been given a reason to go all out since WW2. We now have the nuclear deterrent meaning an all out conflict is less likely since everyone is afraid (rightly so) of the consequences.
(Two) When did I say it was? When dealing with a complete unknown, caution is the best policy, this is all Hawking was saying.
I would agree, though your last comment implied you were arguing a different point,
And I suggest you reread my comment, because you appear to have misinterpreted my statements on death tolls.
As for deterrence theory, that fails in light of programs like Reagan's "Star Wars" program and the religious fundamentalists who WANT everyone to die.
No, if we had a World War with today’s technology, the death toll would be catastrophic.
Yes there are those who want everyone to die, thankfully none have nukes, yet.... This also enforces my statement that waiting for world consensus for interstellar travel is ridiculous; it’s never going to happen. There are ways around “star wars” the Russians already having missiles capable of countering this defence. Anyway, this has nothing to do with our discussion.
Oh yes, now I get you. The fact that death tolls are now higher than they were for conflicts of similar size in the past changes nothing. There is a complete miss-match in the conflict. And the main reason the big boys aren’t so eager to fight one another nowadays? They’re afraid of each other. Peace through strength and fear, not exactly what could be called social progress.
No, it doesn't, peace through fear doesn't mean we're more understanding of each other. Plus the nut-jobs as yet, haven’t got any nukes, this may change. The violent nature is still there. And this magical global co-operation you're talking about will never happen. It's going to be destiny of some humans to travel the stars. Not all.
Let me rephrase my question. Do you believe that the only reason groups of people willingly coexist is for their own direct benefit, that is, for purely selfish motives such as fear and greed? That they would slaughter each other if they thought it would benefit them?
If you call finger wagging going to their aid then I guess they did. They are not the only reasons but they are major contributors. That’s human nature, fear, envy, love these emotions make us who we are. They are our greatest strength and our greatest weakness. This isn’t going to change. Which is why true global “co-operation” as you like to put it, will never happen. People will always have differing opinions on how things should be done.
150,000 years of evolution has ingrained mainly cooperation into our nature because it was the only way for early hominids -- and modern day humans -- to survive. Obviously, fear and aggression will plague human subconsciousness for a very long time, but the integral issue here is based on suspicion of 'outsiders'.
With human interaction becoming evermore globalized, 'outsiders' will become non-existent, so eventually, humanity may actually find peace with itself.
Sure, let’s wait 150,000 years before we attempt interstellar travel. I would debate you on this, but I've already spent enough time on this topic. No offence but philosophical debates bore me and in the end it’s all just opinion. I was simply pointing out that it’s possible to be an advanced species to still have aggressive tendencies and the assumption that just because an alien race is far more advanced than us doesn’t mean they are benign.
I think there's a high probability that any spacefaring race would be either carnivorous or omnivorous. Because Which is more cunning? Predator or Prey?
So there is a chance aliens could be hostile, but I think that chance would be balanced by the teamwork, reason, and logic that's nessecary to reach the stars.
That's all I'm trying to point out. To assume that just because this hypothetical alien race is far more advanced than us doesn’t mean they will automatically be benign and to assume this is extremely naive. This doesn’t mean they are monsters either, in fact I would imagine their demeanor to be a lot like ours; capable of good and bad. With regards to teamwork, some of the most aggressive species on our planet work in teams. Aggression does not equate to stupidity.
I'm not talking about horrors. There are those who have absolutely no interest in space travel or science. And they number in the billions. It threatens their beliefs, the very foundation of their lives so they don't want to know. So, good luck with that.
@1RadicalOne "socially developed"? Misguided term. "Social development", ie, the development of society to where the individual's autonomy over his own life, creation, and labor is further and further reduced in favor of those things being enslaved to the will of the collective, does NOT lead to progress. It is a force that squeezes the intellectual life out of man. Any society that makes any progress does so by the creations of an independent, individual mind, that does so for it's own purpose.
@Alexandurs i am no kid nor am i delusional u fucktard do some research u fucking dumbass before u go calling me delusional u have no room to talk living in that happy little world of urs away from the real 1
@whitestar111 Show me your supposed research then to prove it because I really fear that you truly are, like what Alexandurs claimed, a delusional adult, and that's just sad.
@MegaTouchy lmao want proof look out side ur door u stupid fuck
watch video's of 911 it went straight down it was bombs in the building wtc 7 went down and no way in hell debri would of been able to do that
u got obama who is pretty much doing the same shit bush did when he said he wasn't going to
i really can go on for a long time i am not the delusional 1 here and i am not goin to sit here tryin to explain to peoplewho by now should already know it
@whitestar111 1. A building falling straight down doesn't necessarily mean that it's caused by bombs. The plane crash probably broke something vital in the structure that would cause the building to fall like that. 2. You can't blame Obama. He's trying, but the people aren't helping. 3. If you are, in fact, true, you should be doing something about it instead of doing nothing. Spread the word, but, then again, you'd be spreading lies. You claim others to be ignorant when you are the one who is.
@MegaTouchy 1. A building falling straight down is a planned destruction. WTC was made to resist up to 26 plane crashes. And even if it would have collapsed due to those 2 planes, it wouldnt have been straight down. 2. Obama just listen at his superiors, aka multinationals for example. Its google and microsoft that are the real rulers. 3. You are ignorant. Believing anything is being simple, believing nothing is being ignorant.
@Eldeecue CNN, national geographics, and all the damn new magasines on TV and in books they pumped us up since the towers felt. You lived on a moutain or what you didnt saw that? Now ofc, maybe they lied on TV ... but if so, maybe they lied about how it happened also. Wicked eh, whats true whats not at the end? ... Like drupib says, tower structure was made to resist plane crashes. Logical it is, as they were very high ^^ Dont you think?
@GDZjeenik I'm not sure about your other facts.. but to say a building can resist up to something means that number could be as low as 1. UP TO does not mean it CAN. Do you really think any building can resist 26 plane crashes? Reality? No.
@Hatchwork "to say any building can resist" means ALL buildings can resist, and no. The WTC could resist. If you don't like 26, take it a little lower, but reality YES it can resist 2 little toy planes...
@MegaTouchy CNN, national geographics etc aren't actual facts for you? Can you explain us more about it? I got the impression you know something more about conspiracy that I dont know.
@MegaTouchy You re an idiot LOL. Maybe you can start to show me links that prove I'm wrong. Thats the base of our society. You need to prove something is wrong. So show me. I don't know about conspiracy or whatever. I just know WTC was made to resist loads of plane crashes (26 for what I saw, can be 20 or 15, I dont know dont care), but for one of another reason, 2planes made the 2 towers crash .... end. Nothing else to say.
@GDZjeenik It's amusing when you label me an idiot, and yet you know nothing of Occam's Razor, or the imperative that whoever claims X has the burden of proof, not the skeptic. If simple concepts like that escape you, there's no point in furthering this discussion.
@MegaTouchy Actually, you re more idiotic as I thought. You ask for link 'n link, but you can only talk what you googled up 5 min ago kid. You can stay here and argue with me how much you want. Fact is, that WTC building structure was made to resist more as 1 plane crash. Is that so hard for you to accept? Do I talk about conspiracy or aliens or illuminaty? No, Just about how WTC was made. I also saw life thats 2 plane crashed 2 building.
@MegaTouchy Also, you talk about simple concepts. Do you at least realise more as 90% of our earthlings don't know what you talk about without googling it up? Fact is what I say, is a very simple concept. If you build a very high building, you will make sure it wont collapse easily, like when you make a car, you will make sure the ppl in it will get as less as possible hurted if the car crash. But ... I can understand you dont got your head 100% straight. Puberty can hurt :)
Hard facts? Please. Why not just go straight to "Bush/Queen Elizabeth/Bill Gates/[insert major political or economic figure here] is really a secret reptilian bent on taking over the world"?
@1RadicalOne: What, the reptillians from V only wanted our water... you know, that stuff there is estimated to be several thousand oceans worth in orbit so far out in the solar system we'd never notice anyone taking a big sippy straw to :rollseyes:
What is the relaxing tune played throughout this video? I like the sound of it. Let me know! Thanks! :)
nathanforst 6 months ago
Do we where where or which supernova clusters have Gold in them created in large quantity?
samann95014 10 months ago
@samann95014 well, we know exactly where a shit ton of gold and metals are closeby in our own solar system...
you have to realize that this entire commodities market we have at the moment is but an inflated farce... we have the technology to actually get more resources than 20 billion humans could use in a century by just hauling one medium sized asteroid from the kuiper belt... one of billions...
question is who has the means and the balls to do it first...
BraunDang 8 months ago
wow i love how in the beginning they're playing a song by rammstein xDDD
talim1818188 1 year ago
How do we turn a buck out of this?
TheAmericanRifleman 1 year ago
knowledge like this is priceless
thank you spacerip
metalheadblues 1 year ago 6
I don't see how a rectal bleeding commercial has anything to do with this. I'm so sick of commercials.
derekxnl 1 year ago
very nice,
cool70200 1 year ago
feuer frei!
pitviper12345 1 year ago
how does it detect chrome and manganese? Emission or absorption spectroscopy presumably. Tenuous metal-vapor cloud obscuring known star types ... that's not absorption spectroscopy necessarily .. I gather this chrome cloud supports electrical discharges the colors bare the tell-tale chrome (and manganese) spectra. I guess we could google deeper on this particular orbiting telescope.
PigsCanFly99 1 year ago
do I hear rammstein?...i think I do...;)
6stringplaya77 1 year ago
crazy
heatseeker4474 1 year ago
For the record, just because I have trouble visualising numbers that large, that's 597370000000000000000000000000000 kg.
Quouar 1 year ago 2
I heard Google Chrome created that dust cloud as a marketing ploy
MazeleyFanClub 1 year ago 8
Its possible for there to be planets with high amounts of gold, platinum, diamonds, anything else that we monkeys find valuable :)
AvatarOfAvatar 1 year ago 2
There'sno two ways about it. Science is amazing.
karadan100 1 year ago
Nice, but I wish they hadn't hired someone with such an annoying valley-girl speech impediment to narrate this. :P
Xonx68 1 year ago
wow chromey
darkbluemars 1 year ago
How old is Universe! smiles
wcmithaug 1 year ago
this is where it gets interesting, if there is life out there they might make there self known when we starting taking resources
DNO221 1 year ago
HEAVY METAL THUNDER!
waterdamnaged 1 year ago
Where is all the gold? I claim dibs on all space gold!
Kousaburo 1 year ago
CYBERTRON!
raby760 1 year ago 2
@raby760 you win the internet
pato1996 1 year ago
@pato1996, yah! I want it delivered in the mail.
raby760 1 year ago
so, what if they found a galaxy with 10 trillion times the mass of earth in gold?
shadesilverwing0 1 year ago
@shadesilverwing0 chaos
gulwant 1 year ago
@shadesilverwing0 Diamonds<3
TheEmoMunk 1 year ago
@shadesilverwing0 gold prices drop
pato1996 1 year ago
@shadesilverwing0 We'd spend all the Earth's resources to find a way to harvest it, and then realize that gold is now worthless. Then we'd facepalm.
TheFritz92 1 year ago
@shadesilverwing0 and if they collected it? Gold wouldnt be worth a shit anymore
Jerrod2008 1 year ago
Is it safe to assume that whoever lives in the Perseus cluster probably has some pretty sweet rims on their motorcycle?
superfunbad 1 year ago 2
@superfunbad
Lol, mate.
d3st88 1 year ago
@superfunbad
From what I understood, they more likely to have a pretty sweet motorcycle on their rims.
d3st88 1 year ago
thinking we need to to get out there and do what we do best,,,before we start fighting over whats left to use up here.,,,Whoops seems we already are, have, and will ...Shame ,,,such a wonderfull species,,,
Keep on posting spacerip
tellmeverything 1 year ago
Spacerip, I would like to father your children. Thank you for these amazing uploads!
gzussturbo 1 year ago
Heavy Metal.
Sulcuscentralis 1 year ago 39
@Sulcuscentralis \m/
Heavyassalter 1 year ago
@Sulcuscentralis
\m/
reed00112 1 year ago 2
i didnt know an observatory could identify elements. thats awesome!
SketchPalace 1 year ago
@SketchPalace
Yes and it is so simple yet elegantly done. Simply by splitting light with a prism and analyzing the missing wave lengths we can see what elements it has passed through, since all elements absorb light differently.
fuunguus 1 year ago
Awesome...too bad we can't go there :(
eah2119 1 year ago
This channel kicks so much ass. It is my favorite channel of all time.
Looks like there is no way to exhaust that chromium..unless there were a ten trillion times the earth's population to use it.
matreyia 1 year ago
i just love the graphic of spacerip's videos.
mahindra123456789 1 year ago 2
Stars emit light and heat as a result of fusion reactions. When the fusion reactions reach the element iron (Fe), the star explodes with a supernova. So, how do we get the elements bigger than iron on the periodic table? This is a question that does not jive with supernova cosmology. Supernovas are a process of energy transformation but they do not explain the creation of large elements. How are these elements formed? Obviously I'm aware that Cr and Mn occur just before Fe on the periodic table.
MrAnguswangus 1 year ago
@MrAnguswangus
The extreme conditions present in a supernova explosion are capable of fusing heavier elements than iron.
ytmoog 1 year ago
Chromium?What's so interestign about it?What can you use it for?
SacreDro 1 year ago
@SacreDro Driving probably.
Ypipable 1 year ago
@SacreDro Bumpers
ArtisanTony 1 year ago
@SacreDro It's interesting because like 99% of the universe is made up of hydrogen and helium (very light and simple elements). Chromium is a heavy and complex element and is very rarely found in high quantity at one corner of the universe.
eah2119 1 year ago
@eah2119
Perhaps 99% of the VISIBLE universe is H and He.
Technically, all that we can see; Planets, asteroids, stars, nebulae, comets, Hydrogen, Helium, and dust; Only makes up 5% of the total mass in the universe.
The other 95% is unknown. Comprised of the 'stuff' that we call darkmatter, and darkenergy.
L00NGB00W 1 year ago
@SacreDro Chromium is most widely known for its use in chrome plating and in the creation of alloys like stainless steel and high-heat-resistant nickel alloys. It is also used in various pigments for paint (i.e. chrome red, chrome yellow).
However, the point of the video was not how great it is that there is so much chrome in another galaxy, but how strange it is that is so much of a relatively rare element in that galaxy cluster.
H3r3ticH3r0 1 year ago
Holy crap. Numbers to boggle the mind :P
SpeedFreakNO 1 year ago
So whith all that we can build the death star?:D
gachman 1 year ago 26
@gachman Hey folks... don't forget to FAVORITE and hit the LIKE button... to help expose this shiny gem to the wider world! Thanks!!!!
SpaceRip 1 year ago 25
@gachman just like a stupid ju to think he can build something bigger then storage shed. we are humans and this idiot thinks people can build a star, it might be joke but IT IS his state of mind, humans are slowly dieing off because of the antics of economical and social stratification only intended to help inferior gene (jews) to survive.american kids are fat and ugly yet over confindent ? how does that work?
Jews are bad for human evolution. tie their tubes, cut testies not foreskin.
dfhohj 1 year ago
oh sweet now i can piantjob my car chrom without worreing that it will end
Adj19888 1 year ago
pitty we'l never reach it
ox4poluter 1 year ago
When are they going to find adammantium?
drupib 1 year ago 2
@drupib : when they name something adamantium. :)
fokGoogol 1 year ago 2
DIBS!!!!! I called t! you all saw it!
Xehanator 1 year ago 2
This leads me to believe that there may have been other ways that heavier elements were formed, other than just supernovae.
culwin 1 year ago
love the narrators voice, informative too
segedinacm 1 year ago
Holy sh*t...now we know where to go if we need chromium and manganese
NAWRARESNAW 1 year ago
So.... why are they called "rare" metals again?!? ;)
toulouse666 1 year ago
and shes using chrome browser!! wow!!!
bmd900 1 year ago
And now comes space piracy! :D
reviathon360 1 year ago
Could you IMAGINE how much all that Chromium's WORTH!
Nerdykid95 1 year ago
Why can't people just enjoy an educational video without writing comments to try and prove how smart they are and boost their egos? If you're so smart, why watch what you already know? Particularly Mr. Whitestar
cbennz514 1 year ago
maybe the chromium is the residue left from an explotion of an extraterrestrial vessel D:!!!!!!
SolidGaby 1 year ago
@SolidGaby I like too think that too. The Chromium were the residue left after billions of spaceships exploded in an extreme extraterrestrial war! That would be freakin' awesome! >:D
ralphkristian2 1 year ago
wonder if we will one day find an asteroid of gold or diamonds, remains of a planet that was destroyed.
lejink 1 year ago
And so man's greed will extend beyond the stars, for there is much to be salvaged from the infinite treasure troves of space...
noregrets92 1 year ago
Actually the universe is 5% regular matter, 25% dark-matter and 70% dark-energy. Am I wrong SpaceRip?
bigboy45454545 1 year ago
I love the universe
STARCO1231 1 year ago
@ivanxdxd2008 lol ur one of those dumb trolls
STARCO1231 1 year ago
goddamn this channel is a mindfuck... i love it!!!
PREM00SE 1 year ago
Thank You! This made my joint so much smoother :)
MAGNETGRUNT 1 year ago
And there are people who say aliens would invade this planet for the resources.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne i doubt that would happen plus many people believe they already been here (ancient astronaut theory)
whitestar111 1 year ago
Yes, that would never happen; it is ridiculous to believe such a thing.
I am talking to you, Hawking.
As for ancient astronauts, steer well clear of that. Ever see people going on about Reptilians/Reptoids/Annunaki? That is one of the craziest conspiracy theories there are.
Think of the "NWO" conspiracy theory, the FEMA camps, freemasons, Illuminati, mole people, shadow government, etc etc etc.
The reptilian theory one-ups even all those.
Combined.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
I think it’s more to do with the fact that habitable planets like Earth are so rare rather than any resources it has.
jedisenior 1 year ago
A race advanced enough to come here is also advanced enough to terraform.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
True, but why bother when there is one readymade? You only need look at human history to see what happens when advanced civilisations meet ones that are less so. There is no reason to assume extraterrestrials would behave any differently.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Yes, there is. Notice how it has been the most aggressive and violent societies that behaved like that.
And notice how short-lived such societies tend to be.
As Sagan said, a society advanced enough to build a starship of such a scale is necessarily socially developed enough to behave far better than the Inquisition.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
The Roman Empire wasn't so short lived. And those Star ships may have built due to military necessity.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Actually, it was. Especially when you consider the timescales of species as a whole.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
Actually it lasted longer than most, and so far, a lot longer than modern civilisation. And in the time scales of our species there haven't been many of what can be classified as civilisations at all. War can garner the co-operation needed to construct massive star ships, just look at the advances made during World War 2. To suggest that this hypothetical advanced alien race would be automatically benign is naive to say the least.
jedisenior 1 year ago
"Actually it lasted longer than most, and so far, a lot longer than modern civilisation."
So? That is a far cry from the time required to advance to the level required to behave like in Independence Day.
And why would war create the building of starships? What use is a starship in a war?
A starship requires global cooperation to build. Thus such a civilization would have already learned to move past the sectarianism and so on that the invasion idea is founded on.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
I’m beginning to think you’re deliberately misinterpreting what I’m saying? If this advanced alien civilisation exists, there is absolutely no reason that there can’t be more than one and thus these races will have encountered each other at some point. No doubt, as it is here on Earth, they will occasionally have disagreements which escalate to war. The notion that we will all just get along is laughable and to be honest so is this conversation, cont..
jedisenior 1 year ago
....since we haven’t even proven such life exists. If it does, there is no doubt there will be benign races, but this won’t always be the case.
jedisenior 1 year ago
No, I am not deliberately misinterpreting you. If you feel I did misinterpret, explain.
PS
I looked up your username; have you considered the possibility that your assumptions are being influenced by the media you appear to enjoy?
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
The name is a dig at organised religion. I’ve already explained how you misinterpreted me. If they do exist; this “unification” you’re talking about can be born out of an, us and them mentality if other advanced races exist. Have you considered your assumptions are based on idealism rather than realism? And seriously, this is all speculation. We don’t even know that such life exists.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Plus there is the possibility that we are one of, if not the most advanced civilisation in the universe. I don't like discussions based on pure speculation, they come down to opinion rather than evidence and can go on forever.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Oh. A gross misunderstanding on my part.
OK, I see the point you are trying to make, but why would a society have learned to put aside their own differences - necessary to build such a ship (do you really think humans could do it today, even if you had the technology?) - yet simultaneously not be able to get past the differences between species?
And yes, you do not know that such life exists. But considering the numbers, it is extremely likely that it does.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
As things stand today, yes. I think we could easily construct a star ship. With the current state of propulsion technology however, it would be pointless. We could easily build the ship, but it won’t go anywhere in a hurry. So the will to do it just isn’t there. We are advancing nicely at the moment, despite the obvious division in the world, and I don't see that changing. Don’t forget the differences between us and species from another planet will be far more radical.
jedisenior 1 year ago
They could be an affront to everything we stand for, or vice versa. To assume they would be friendly without checking first would be extremely short sighted and naive. Don’t forget in diplomacy, it can be very useful to speak softly but wield a big stick. ; )
jedisenior 1 year ago
How? Such a project would cost trillions of dollars or more. And it would require decades worth of resources. No one nation - hell, no one CONTINENT could do it alone.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
The LHC didn't cost trillions of dollars. There are asteroids made of near pure iron and other useful metals. The obstacle to space exploration isn’t human resources. It’s technological. If we had much better propulsion, space exploration would take off. The entire world’s co-operation isn’t needed, and when the time comes, won’t be needed. But as things stand, the will to do it just isn’t there.
jedisenior 1 year ago
We are not talking about the LHC. We are talking about a starship large enough to hold thousands or millions of people. A starship the size of a small city.
That would have to be built entirely in space.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
Why would it need to hold thousands or millions? Its purpose would be for interstellar travel, and its success would be defined by its speed, not its carrying capacity.
jedisenior 1 year ago
The original purpose was to either invade or steal the resources of the entire planet, remember?
And do you have any idea how much it costs to lift things into orbit? To lift one kilogram into orbit, it costs about the same as to buy of a kilogram of solid gold.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
I'm talking about us. And you start off small, when technology and manufacturing improve, you build bigger. Meaning, there is no need to spend trillions of dollars on one ship.
jedisenior 1 year ago
But those small ships could never be of the kind required for the goal we were originally discussing. As I have said numerous times, it would take cooperation that humans do not yet have to build such a ship. And that the acquisition of such cooperation need not be restricted to one's own species, and there is no evidence that it will.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
You're just not getting me. I'm not saying we will conquer other planets. It will take thousands of years before we have that kind of technology and by that stage will have already occupied many star systems. The idea all of humanity and their different ideologies will be required to advance to this level is ridiculous. It will just take one ideology to accomplish this. The rest can do what they like and be left behind.
jedisenior 1 year ago
It’s a gradual process, and I can guarantee you violence will still be in us. This doesn’t mean we will subjugate any we come across, but wars will not be beyond us. The same will go for any other civilisations that may be out there. Just because they are advanced doesn’t mean they won’t turn nasty given the right circumstances.
jedisenior 1 year ago
And now you have presented another paradox. The ability to colonize multiple star systems at will.
Yet one of your original premises was that the Earth would be in demand, being difficult to acquire similar planets.
Those two are in conflict.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
Colonise uninhabited star systems, not conquer an already advanced race. You don’t need to terraform a planet to have a presence in a star system. It’s a possibility the Earth will be in demand. It is also possible we just won’t like each other. I keep saying, there is absolutely no reason to think their behaviour will be any different to ours and our behaviour will not need to change for us to become seriously advanced.
jedisenior 1 year ago
@jedisenior nuke the aliens
Shadowcry1000 1 year ago
@Shadowcry1000
I wouldn't go that far. I'm just pointing out that the idea that every advanced race must be benign is naive.
jedisenior 1 year ago
@jedisenior Well to be honest we have no idea what to do in such a circumstance, so when beginning relations, we would on the whole should try to be peaceful unless circumstance dictates otherwise. Aka We will be passive initially
Shadowcry1000 1 year ago
@Shadowcry1000
Agreed, caution is advised. As many have said, we should keep our heads down for the moment. As things stand, we wouldn't have a hope. Even as we advance and begin to explore the galaxy, caution would be advised. I’m not advocating war. I’m just pointing out that it is naive to assume that a species way more advanced than us must be peaceful.
jedisenior 1 year ago
@jedisenior
My personal opinion is that we will never reach the stars, but I think if we do optimism must play a stronger role in intergalactic relations.
Shadowcry1000 1 year ago
@Shadowcry1000
I hope you’re wrong, but the way things are going you might be right. Initial estimates said we should have been to Mars by now, progress seems to have halted. The will to explore just isn’t there anymore. It’s hard to be optimistic when you look at current events.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Let's flip this around.
Recall the fact that all extraterrestrial life would be radically different in nature from the life here - so different that nothing here could be used to draw conclusions about the nature of this other civilization. Nothing.
Now what evidence do you have that they are hostile?
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
None, that’s my whole point, but all we have to draw from is our behaviour and history. We can’t assume anything. Just as we can’t assume that they being more advanced than us will make them friendly. Some may be friendly; others not so much, I’ve already stated this, look back through the comments. I also stated there is no evidence that there is any intelligent life to begin with.
jedisenior 1 year ago
But you cannot draw from your behavior and history. That would be like studying the history of some random animal and drawing conclusions about the future behavior of humans.
Actually, no, this is even more removed than that.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
Your point is? I've already said this. We are advancing just nicely despite the world being as violent and divided as it ever was. This idea that worldwide consensus will be required for us to achieve interstellar travel is idiotic. If this is what we’re waiting for, we will never leave this rock; it’s as simple as that. And none of this proves that these hypothetical advanced races will be friendly, simply because they’re more advanced than us.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Two things.
One, the world is not "as violent and divided as it ever was".
That is an illusion, created by two main mechanisms. One, increased reporting. Thirty years ago a scuffle in the Middle East went unnnoticed; now it is headline news. And technology has increased the death toll from hostilities of scales no larger than that of the past.
Two, the lack of proof of their friendliness is not proof of their hostility. As I am sure you know.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
One) I would argue that the basic nature of the human race has not changed in the last hundred years. The only reason the death toll hasn't increased is nobody has been given a reason to go all out since WW2. We now have the nuclear deterrent meaning an all out conflict is less likely since everyone is afraid (rightly so) of the consequences.
(Two) When did I say it was? When dealing with a complete unknown, caution is the best policy, this is all Hawking was saying.
jedisenior 1 year ago
I would agree, though your last comment implied you were arguing a different point,
And I suggest you reread my comment, because you appear to have misinterpreted my statements on death tolls.
As for deterrence theory, that fails in light of programs like Reagan's "Star Wars" program and the religious fundamentalists who WANT everyone to die.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
No, if we had a World War with today’s technology, the death toll would be catastrophic.
Yes there are those who want everyone to die, thankfully none have nukes, yet.... This also enforces my statement that waiting for world consensus for interstellar travel is ridiculous; it’s never going to happen. There are ways around “star wars” the Russians already having missiles capable of countering this defence. Anyway, this has nothing to do with our discussion.
jedisenior 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
Oh yes, now I get you. The fact that death tolls are now higher than they were for conflicts of similar size in the past changes nothing. There is a complete miss-match in the conflict. And the main reason the big boys aren’t so eager to fight one another nowadays? They’re afraid of each other. Peace through strength and fear, not exactly what could be called social progress.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Regarding the first point:
It changes your original assertion that humanity was "as divided and violent as ever" or similar.
And as for the second, that is the Mutual assured destruction principle, which I addressed last comment.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
No, it doesn't, peace through fear doesn't mean we're more understanding of each other. Plus the nut-jobs as yet, haven’t got any nukes, this may change. The violent nature is still there. And this magical global co-operation you're talking about will never happen. It's going to be destiny of some humans to travel the stars. Not all.
No, the Russians have a way around it.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Are you actually insinuating that the only reason any two governments cooperate is because of fear of each other?
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
Hardly, but it’s a major contributing factor, greed is another. Didn’t see anybody racing to the Georgians aid did you?
jedisenior 1 year ago
Actually, I did.
Let me rephrase my question. Do you believe that the only reason groups of people willingly coexist is for their own direct benefit, that is, for purely selfish motives such as fear and greed? That they would slaughter each other if they thought it would benefit them?
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
If you call finger wagging going to their aid then I guess they did. They are not the only reasons but they are major contributors. That’s human nature, fear, envy, love these emotions make us who we are. They are our greatest strength and our greatest weakness. This isn’t going to change. Which is why true global “co-operation” as you like to put it, will never happen. People will always have differing opinions on how things should be done.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Reaching the stars will have to be done without it.
jedisenior 1 year ago
Comment removed
jedisenior 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People will always have differing opinions on how things should be done.
Yes, but the way of settling those differences need not be the horrors that are currently used.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@jedisenior
I disagree.
150,000 years of evolution has ingrained mainly cooperation into our nature because it was the only way for early hominids -- and modern day humans -- to survive. Obviously, fear and aggression will plague human subconsciousness for a very long time, but the integral issue here is based on suspicion of 'outsiders'.
With human interaction becoming evermore globalized, 'outsiders' will become non-existent, so eventually, humanity may actually find peace with itself.
TheAtheistAllegiance 1 year ago
@TheAtheistAllegiance
Sure, let’s wait 150,000 years before we attempt interstellar travel. I would debate you on this, but I've already spent enough time on this topic. No offence but philosophical debates bore me and in the end it’s all just opinion. I was simply pointing out that it’s possible to be an advanced species to still have aggressive tendencies and the assumption that just because an alien race is far more advanced than us doesn’t mean they are benign.
jedisenior 1 year ago
@jedisenior
I think there's a high probability that any spacefaring race would be either carnivorous or omnivorous. Because Which is more cunning? Predator or Prey?
So there is a chance aliens could be hostile, but I think that chance would be balanced by the teamwork, reason, and logic that's nessecary to reach the stars.
But indeed. Let's get off this rock already...
L00NGB00W 1 year ago
Comment removed
L00NGB00W 1 year ago
Comment removed
jedisenior 1 year ago
Comment removed
jedisenior 1 year ago
@L00NGB00W
That's all I'm trying to point out. To assume that just because this hypothetical alien race is far more advanced than us doesn’t mean they will automatically be benign and to assume this is extremely naive. This doesn’t mean they are monsters either, in fact I would imagine their demeanor to be a lot like ours; capable of good and bad. With regards to teamwork, some of the most aggressive species on our planet work in teams. Aggression does not equate to stupidity.
jedisenior 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne
I'm not talking about horrors. There are those who have absolutely no interest in space travel or science. And they number in the billions. It threatens their beliefs, the very foundation of their lives so they don't want to know. So, good luck with that.
jedisenior 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne "socially developed"? Misguided term. "Social development", ie, the development of society to where the individual's autonomy over his own life, creation, and labor is further and further reduced in favor of those things being enslaved to the will of the collective, does NOT lead to progress. It is a force that squeezes the intellectual life out of man. Any society that makes any progress does so by the creations of an independent, individual mind, that does so for it's own purpose.
rationalegoist90 1 year ago
Then I misused a term, because that is not what I mean.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne hum ancient astronaut theory has some hard facts on its side so i won't sheer clear of it
what why u have to put theory after conspiracy when alot of shit is happening
i find ppl like u ignorant if ur tellin me non of it is true the reptillian shit idk about but their is alot more stuff going on than u know
the illuminati is real and shadow government , and nwo
whitestar111 1 year ago
@whitestar111 I hope you are a kid, otherwise you'd be just a delusional adult, and that's just sad.
Alexandurs 1 year ago
@Alexandurs i am no kid nor am i delusional u fucktard do some research u fucking dumbass before u go calling me delusional u have no room to talk living in that happy little world of urs away from the real 1
whitestar111 1 year ago
@whitestar111 Show me your supposed research then to prove it because I really fear that you truly are, like what Alexandurs claimed, a delusional adult, and that's just sad.
MegaTouchy 1 year ago
@MegaTouchy lmao want proof look out side ur door u stupid fuck
watch video's of 911 it went straight down it was bombs in the building wtc 7 went down and no way in hell debri would of been able to do that
u got obama who is pretty much doing the same shit bush did when he said he wasn't going to
i really can go on for a long time i am not the delusional 1 here and i am not goin to sit here tryin to explain to peoplewho by now should already know it
whitestar111 1 year ago
@whitestar111 1. A building falling straight down doesn't necessarily mean that it's caused by bombs. The plane crash probably broke something vital in the structure that would cause the building to fall like that. 2. You can't blame Obama. He's trying, but the people aren't helping. 3. If you are, in fact, true, you should be doing something about it instead of doing nothing. Spread the word, but, then again, you'd be spreading lies. You claim others to be ignorant when you are the one who is.
MegaTouchy 1 year ago
@MegaTouchy 1. A building falling straight down is a planned destruction. WTC was made to resist up to 26 plane crashes. And even if it would have collapsed due to those 2 planes, it wouldnt have been straight down. 2. Obama just listen at his superiors, aka multinationals for example. Its google and microsoft that are the real rulers. 3. You are ignorant. Believing anything is being simple, believing nothing is being ignorant.
GDZjeenik 1 year ago
@GDZjeenik
26 plane crashes? Really? That's a new one....might I trouble you for a souce? And prisonplanet/infowars don't count.
Eldeecue 1 year ago
@Eldeecue Just look up the tower's structure and do the math...
drupib 1 year ago
@Eldeecue CNN, national geographics, and all the damn new magasines on TV and in books they pumped us up since the towers felt. You lived on a moutain or what you didnt saw that? Now ofc, maybe they lied on TV ... but if so, maybe they lied about how it happened also. Wicked eh, whats true whats not at the end? ... Like drupib says, tower structure was made to resist plane crashes. Logical it is, as they were very high ^^ Dont you think?
GDZjeenik 1 year ago
@GDZjeenik I'm not sure about your other facts.. but to say a building can resist up to something means that number could be as low as 1. UP TO does not mean it CAN. Do you really think any building can resist 26 plane crashes? Reality? No.
Hatchwork 1 year ago
@Hatchwork "to say any building can resist" means ALL buildings can resist, and no. The WTC could resist. If you don't like 26, take it a little lower, but reality YES it can resist 2 little toy planes...
drupib 1 year ago
@GDZjeenik Shut the fuck up with your conspiracy rants, and learn actual facts before spewing bullshit. The world would be a better place, honestly.
MegaTouchy 1 year ago
@MegaTouchy CNN, national geographics etc aren't actual facts for you? Can you explain us more about it? I got the impression you know something more about conspiracy that I dont know.
GDZjeenik 1 year ago
@GDZjeenik Supply links, end of.
MegaTouchy 1 year ago
@MegaTouchy You re an idiot LOL. Maybe you can start to show me links that prove I'm wrong. Thats the base of our society. You need to prove something is wrong. So show me. I don't know about conspiracy or whatever. I just know WTC was made to resist loads of plane crashes (26 for what I saw, can be 20 or 15, I dont know dont care), but for one of another reason, 2planes made the 2 towers crash .... end. Nothing else to say.
GDZjeenik 1 year ago
@GDZjeenik It's amusing when you label me an idiot, and yet you know nothing of Occam's Razor, or the imperative that whoever claims X has the burden of proof, not the skeptic. If simple concepts like that escape you, there's no point in furthering this discussion.
MegaTouchy 1 year ago
@MegaTouchy Actually, you re more idiotic as I thought. You ask for link 'n link, but you can only talk what you googled up 5 min ago kid. You can stay here and argue with me how much you want. Fact is, that WTC building structure was made to resist more as 1 plane crash. Is that so hard for you to accept? Do I talk about conspiracy or aliens or illuminaty? No, Just about how WTC was made. I also saw life thats 2 plane crashed 2 building.
GDZjeenik 1 year ago
@MegaTouchy Also, you talk about simple concepts. Do you at least realise more as 90% of our earthlings don't know what you talk about without googling it up? Fact is what I say, is a very simple concept. If you build a very high building, you will make sure it wont collapse easily, like when you make a car, you will make sure the ppl in it will get as less as possible hurted if the car crash. But ... I can understand you dont got your head 100% straight. Puberty can hurt :)
GDZjeenik 1 year ago
@whitestar111 Now I am convinced that Alexandurs is more than just correct! :D
subh1 1 year ago
@whitestar111 .... are u done? lol.
AugieGK4life 1 year ago
Hard facts? Please. Why not just go straight to "Bush/Queen Elizabeth/Bill Gates/[insert major political or economic figure here] is really a secret reptilian bent on taking over the world"?
Your standards of evidence are low.
Pitifully low.
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
@whitestar111 really??
molpr 1 year ago
@molpr do some research and it would be obvious
whitestar111 1 year ago
@whitestar111
*facepalm*
TheRedneckAtheist 1 year ago
@1RadicalOne: What, the reptillians from V only wanted our water... you know, that stuff there is estimated to be several thousand oceans worth in orbit so far out in the solar system we'd never notice anyone taking a big sippy straw to :rollseyes:
RyuDarragh 1 year ago