Added: 3 years ago
From: LibDem
Views: 6,682
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I Seriously Wish That Brian Won Hes So Cute Like a Little Babyy and Stoopidd People Didnt Vote For Him I Think Hes Campagine Was Really Good He Should have won, instead of that shaggy dog Boris KMT..!

  • I'm considering giving Brian one of my votes. But I am concerned that Mike Tuffrey is part of his campaign team as he has a history in Lambeth that I am aware of having been in local politics in South London since 1989. Brian has more credibility as a Londoner than Johnson by a city mile. He needs to watch some of his own campaign team like a hawk.

  • The area used for filming is the Canada Water estate in Rotherhithe, having lived here for 4 years and not having a single problem I find it rather dubious that it is the back drop for a gang run area. Surely Brixton or Stockwell would have been more appropriate backdrops and make the message seem like a less staged film for PR purposes.

  • paddick is scared to film in bricky lol

  • Boris: clown

    Ken: slimey

    Brian: the only serious candidate

  • Slimey?

  • I meant slimy.

  • I wasn't questioning your spelling. I was wondering what you meant.

  • Ken changes opinion very quickly just to go with the public's flow. One day his office approves something, then the next day the public gets upset, and then Ken would "agree" with them and march along. If I am correct, the Olympic logo was one of the examples.

    You will also find that Ken sometimes dodges questions by diverting it to something like "the voters/Londoners want...".

    He has also broken some promises as well, which are often mentioned in the debates.

  • Interesting that you should mention the 2012 logo. I actually wrote the London 2012 literature design guidelines document. I didn't design the logo though — but I've done a lot of work for the LOCOG and ODA team.

    To be honest, I like Ken. I think he's really done a lot for London and I agree with most things he says. Brian Paddick also seems good but my main concern is keeping Boris out. I'm worried if I vote for Brian then I'll be taking a vote away from Boris's main rival.

  • Ah well, Ken is my second real preference, but like you I will do the same to rid Boris from the first round.

    I've been watching most of the televised debates so far and Boris has not convinced me a bit, apart from the time when Ken said he might steal Boris' idea on "pay back to community for free transport".

  • If you vote Brian first preference and Ken second preference that will do what you want I think - support Brian and also use your vote to stop Boris Johnson winning.

  • I would but Ken is my first choice.

  • I wish there was more publicity for him... nobody seems to know who he is for some reason! I guess he just doesn't shout as much as Ken & Boris :(

  • He sure has the expertise and the track record that's a given!

  • I am voting Liberal Democrats, he's the only candidate with a proven track record of reducing crime in London's toughest areas.

  • I am voting Liberal democrats as I believe it is the best way for London.

  • I'd vote for Paddick if I wasn't from the North.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more