Quite clever adapting the Schrodinger's cat to humor. The punchline travels back in time making the entire joke either funny or not. So if you want to experience time travel, tell a joke. A joke that starts out really good, making people believe "oh this is gonna be a good". Then surprise them with a totally dumb punchline, and you've successfully changed the past. The beginning of the joke that was really good is now totally dumb.
"The Aristocrats" joke is an an interesting exception to the quantum-physics-as-a-punchline mechanism as it punchline and setup are quite reversed in that particular joke.
Just look in the box. Solved. No, seriously I don't get it - that's nothing to be ashamed about right? Are they saying it's both because it can't be documented?
Paul Gaugain walks into a bar, and sees his friend van Gogh sitting in a corner. He calls out, 'Oi Vincent, do you want a beer?'. van Gogh calls back, 'No thanks, I've got one 'ear'.
Schrodinger is anoying... he didn't need to use a cat or a box or the poison... he could just say that without observing he couldnt say if something that have an equal probability to happen or not, had happen or not
@Oesquartejador if you lived in a time where quantum physics was not even a possibility would you believe it if someone walked up to you and told something so absurd without proof.
Very creative. I suppose we could use the GM counter output to trigger a relay that energizes a solenoid so that its plunger strikes the cyanide capsule. What next?
where does it exist as both dead and alive? (since in reality, it can only be one or the other) in our heads? in the box? theoretically? in our explanation of the possible outcome?
Lol wow, i'm doing a project on Schrodinger and i just decided to look this up. it took me so long to under stand it but this vid did it =D. so everything is in more that one state until it is observed. the cat is dead and alive until it is observed. thats what a lot of these vids are leaving out.
Actually I'm pretty sure Wikipedia does elaborate on it... if not... I'm sure other pages do.
He used the cat to show how absurd the idea is that something could be considered both alive and dead which is what some people took as a conclusion to his former experiments.
If the cat didn't move it would eventually starve to death, so if the box was to be closed, the cat is(scientificly speaking) already dead once you close is. The chances are 1\1
naa because it's only a thought experiment to in a sense it is a proto type if someone was to try out the experiment he would most probably tie the cat down or separate the cat from the radiative material, Geiger counter, hammer, cyanide, and the mechanical device for dropping the hammer using a sheet of metal or whatever with an air vent to the cat will die if the cyanide is released... all though this experiment shouldn't be done it is just to prove a point...
Was that meant to be funny? What was funny about this video? anyway... Schrodinger's cat is Erwin Schrodinger's parodox he saw in Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. The problem with Schrodinger's cat is...The cat itself. Do you think the cat could collapse the wave function of whats in the box. I tend to think yes. So there is no paradox. Some say it's still possible to have this paradox. Even with the collapse occurring in the box. This is not some way of saying "We don't know"
I suppose the cats existence doesn't rly matter, if we adjust the experiment say so that if decay takes place it triggers a nuclear warhead in the box, then before we open the box will the warhead go off or not? because who will collapse the wave function if the box is unopened?
Isn't this just another scientific principle to help them avoid saying those three dreaded words: "We Don't Know"
When the cat is in the box, it is still only one of the two. Since there is no way prove one or the other (bar observing), it makes no sense to say it is both. It makes more sense to say it is either, and use the scientist worst nightmare "We Don't know".
I haven't observed my heart, yet can i say it's both green and yellow?
You idiot. I see that you dont know shit about this. Where is your evidence? Did you study this and prove?? Your a moron, just bcuz ur mind cant handle it dont just say dumb shit.
yeah, name calling doesn't make one the smarter of the two...
the principle behind the cat is to illustrate how superposition is actually absurd, not to prove that both states actually exist.
Schrodinger didn't have tangible evidence either, he referred to the cat thing as a "ridiculous case" and coined to prevent just accepting blurred concepts of reality.
quantum mechanics can be a headache, Schrodinger's thing is not really hard to grasp...
The problem I find with this thought experiment is that the theory states is that we cannot be sure of the state os something until we measure it. It seems to me that saying all states exist simultaneously is just an assumption. I know that we cannot measure something without interfering with it, but if I open a box to see whether the cat is alive or dead, and the cat was alive before I opened the box, just looking at it won't kill the cat.
The host annoyed me, his head bobbed too much and he talks funny, he's trying too much it seems, and it really only results in me wanting to punch him.
I'm going to shoot the next idiot who thinks a superposition of probabilities means something is simultaneously in both states. It simply means if you measure it you have a probability of finding it in one of the states.
that confuses me... if you have measured it, then you know it, there is no probability; if you haven't measured it yet, and are supposing a probability, eg the probability of the cat being alive is 0.2 or whatever, then you are reducing schroddingers paradox to something very trivial indeed... could you explain please?... without the use of a gun please
Not really sure how that reduces the paradox to anything trivial. It's only a paradox when people try to say "the cat is in both states at once before you measure it." It's sorta like saying "if you toss a marble in an icecube tray, the marble is in all the compartments at once before you measure it." There's nothing more special about quantum than there is about probabalistic processes really.
what about the wave and particle duality business...? i thought there was a simple explanation for that too, but then i saw this vid (can't find it now) which suggested light behaves differently depending on how you observe them...
The explanation typically goes as: "Particles (and light) propagate as waves and exchange energy and momentum as particles." It's not like particles are ACTUALLY waves (although it's a useful fiction to use when solving problems) but the probability of measuring it somewhere is given by a wave.
Even classically, though, light travels as waves (electricity and magnetism tells us that). In quantum, it simply says light exchanges energy in discrete bits, which some take to say "hey, we can treat light as a particle when it interacts with stuff." That pretty much sums it up.
On a similar note, I love that Schrodinger's thought experiment was originally an attempt to show how ridiculous he thought quantum mechanics was, but today it's sort of the poster child for explaining fundamental quantum theory to the average Joe.
Similarly, I didn't know if this video would be good, or suck. Upon observation, it sucks.
blindsk8r490 2 months ago 2
aperture science logo on the geiger meter
SecretAgentCholo 7 months ago 2
cant you just listen for the cyanide container to break?
69MrUsername69 7 months ago
@69MrUsername69 its a thick lead box you wouldn't hear it.
RainbowManification 7 months ago
I could barely listen to what he was saying because his excessive head and facial movement was so distracting.
Quintinia 8 months ago
Ahh wtf he can't pronounce Schrödinger correctly!!
ArsonistInUrFirewall 8 months ago
Quite clever adapting the Schrodinger's cat to humor. The punchline travels back in time making the entire joke either funny or not. So if you want to experience time travel, tell a joke. A joke that starts out really good, making people believe "oh this is gonna be a good". Then surprise them with a totally dumb punchline, and you've successfully changed the past. The beginning of the joke that was really good is now totally dumb.
Unicron2012 9 months ago
My physics teacher would LOL at the radioactive cat joke.
yungjesse 9 months ago
it is amazing how shameless you seem in to this video...
lhtd 9 months ago
lool great acting
f00tballfever 9 months ago
I only came here for the nachos.
mooseasaurusrex 9 months ago
Overacting is so annoying I didn't watch over a minute...
foroparapente 10 months ago
Before this clip ended it was in a total state of unfuniness, so I disprove your point sir.
TheSteveMD 11 months ago
@TheSteveMD Thats only because it was in a state of observation....
JaKeTaNzz 10 months ago
"The Aristocrats" joke is an an interesting exception to the quantum-physics-as-a-punchline mechanism as it punchline and setup are quite reversed in that particular joke.
flyabusa 11 months ago
so your gay and not gay at the same time hmmm makes sense!
Fuckinthisshitup 1 year ago
"Green eggs AND ham!? Implausible. New York jewocracy, tellin the country man how to eat his own breakfast!"
HAHAHAHA!!!! I know it has nothing to do with this video, but its a quote that this vid reminded me of!
psford1 1 year ago
Just look in the box. Solved. No, seriously I don't get it - that's nothing to be ashamed about right? Are they saying it's both because it can't be documented?
vmorgun 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and its here but the coverup is strong, if u are interested in a REAL free energy machine then
just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it is probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
porscheghcje 1 year ago
This guy is an idiot... I came to this conclusion before 15 seconds.
Scwirul 1 year ago
Please stop moving your head so much!!!!!1!!!
dozza92 1 year ago
I like the joke :P
ciavarella1292 1 year ago
I get the science part... Humour bypass?
tractor255 1 year ago
I think Schrodinger's cat is dead, because nobody said anything about putting oxygen in the box, and I'm not one to assume
KingUniverso 1 year ago 5
@KingUniverso You - Are - Amazing. 1000 thumbs up!
psford1 1 year ago
Paul Gaugain walks into a bar, and sees his friend van Gogh sitting in a corner. He calls out, 'Oi Vincent, do you want a beer?'. van Gogh calls back, 'No thanks, I've got one 'ear'.
gamesbok 1 year ago
why do you risk killing cats? why???
simlishcroft 1 year ago
@simlishcroft - dear friend, this was a THOUGHT experiment.
AnnekeEnglish 1 year ago
Schrodinger is anoying... he didn't need to use a cat or a box or the poison... he could just say that without observing he couldnt say if something that have an equal probability to happen or not, had happen or not
Oesquartejador 1 year ago
@Oesquartejador if you lived in a time where quantum physics was not even a possibility would you believe it if someone walked up to you and told something so absurd without proof.
2Bitter2bSweet 1 year ago
¡Imposible!
MathUhhhSaurus 1 year ago
This mashing of quantum physics was almost as tenuous as those who use it to justify "new age" crap like Chopra does...
1RadicalOne 1 year ago
i think i can sum this up. the cat is neither dead nor alive....because no one opened the box? SHOULD WE OPEN IT, I DONT KNOW
slayerdog4 1 year ago
its EIGTHER dead or alive lol. So if i dont know if i stopped the tv at home, i will say the tv is on/off? :S LOL
FooootballFreak 1 year ago
The idea of superpositions is that both states are equally likely to exist/have occurred.
So the TV being on or off doesn't really work.
Mncdk 1 year ago
fantabulus
pahulpsg 1 year ago
Very creative. I suppose we could use the GM counter output to trigger a relay that energizes a solenoid so that its plunger strikes the cyanide capsule. What next?
EngineerGuy2 2 years ago
18 half lives... thats actually pretty good.
smariot 2 years ago 26
Scientificly not...
18>9>4.5>2.25>1.125>0.5625>0.28125>0.140625>0.0703125....
It will never get to the whole number zero lol
ThatKidKnows 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
stolen from watching an episode of The Big Bang Theory...
rebeccaschooten 2 years ago
@rebeccaschooten
Exactly. He must have watched the Big Bang Theory and then gone back in time three years to make this video.
Good work, Sherlock!
CollateralSandwich 2 years ago
This is pure genius. LOL
unconteur 2 years ago
But wait! Is the cat not capable of "observing"?
Smackerlacker1 2 years ago
what if the cat knocks over the cyanide, also if it is both alive and dead it means he is a zombie cat, who the hades open a box witha zombie cat?
bjam89 2 years ago
I watched this, but I wasn't here, not at this moment. If you log in or not to Facebook, I am there although not yet.
mckook 2 years ago
4 minutes of my life... wasted... nooooooooooooooo
Masterwid 2 years ago
is this basically a way to explain "suspense?"
nickelandimed 2 years ago
where does it exist as both dead and alive? (since in reality, it can only be one or the other) in our heads? in the box? theoretically? in our explanation of the possible outcome?
nickelandimed 2 years ago
well in reality its either one or the other, but according to quantum theory, it could technically be both.
Rancorboi 2 years ago
Lol wow, i'm doing a project on Schrodinger and i just decided to look this up. it took me so long to under stand it but this vid did it =D. so everything is in more that one state until it is observed. the cat is dead and alive until it is observed. thats what a lot of these vids are leaving out.
DoubleBasschick2 2 years ago
PLease do us all a favor and swallow the poison
TheWeepingCritic 2 years ago
u should get in the box. that would be funny
ministryofsound2008 2 years ago 3
stop shaking your head to cover your bad acting.
Aleisdee 2 years ago 2
stop ripping on people to hide your stupidity
happyking9 2 years ago 3
wow that whole punch line dilemma explained it pretty good.
you dont know the weather the joke is funny until you observe the outcome
whiterabit998 2 years ago 2
Is it necessary to open the mouth so much to speak in english??
txikilin 2 years ago
Schrodinger's did not use his "cat experiment" to show the cat could be considered "alive and dead"... it was the opposite.
Douglas1102 2 years ago
and what pray tell is the opposite?
wikipedia didn't elaborate o.o
he didn't really coin the idea of putting cats in boxes with radioactive stuffs... he only used the idea to illustrate a concept...
Schrödinger wanted to explain with example how quantum superposition is just weird in nature by applying it to the cat
this weird concept can also be applied to social dynamics and decision making.
blacknekokun 2 years ago
Actually I'm pretty sure Wikipedia does elaborate on it... if not... I'm sure other pages do.
He used the cat to show how absurd the idea is that something could be considered both alive and dead which is what some people took as a conclusion to his former experiments.
However I'm not a psysicist... so please check.
Douglas1102 2 years ago
nah , that's basically it.. he just 'dumbed' down the absurdity of the whole superposition thing =)
the guy in this video kinda used it nicely xD
although jokes sometimes are just dead even if the punchline is unobserved or unheard =P
not really a physicist either... some quantum principles are more of a hobby.
blacknekokun 2 years ago
If the cat didn't move it would eventually starve to death, so if the box was to be closed, the cat is(scientificly speaking) already dead once you close is. The chances are 1\1
kimflie 2 years ago
ZOMG lmfao.
aimusleh 3 years ago
that was great! love it.
especially how you make a connection to the whole joke thing being in a state of funniess and unfunniness. lol
kissmybrass1932 3 years ago
This is why jocks shouldn't become scientists.
D4athPanda 3 years ago 34
wouldn't the cat collapse the wave function?
stevnev88 3 years ago
naa because it's only a thought experiment to in a sense it is a proto type if someone was to try out the experiment he would most probably tie the cat down or separate the cat from the radiative material, Geiger counter, hammer, cyanide, and the mechanical device for dropping the hammer using a sheet of metal or whatever with an air vent to the cat will die if the cyanide is released... all though this experiment shouldn't be done it is just to prove a point...
bradkey98765 3 years ago
no to mention the cat dying by asphyxiating rendering the experiment moot... unless supplying the cat with constant oxigen.
but it does serve to illustrate the point which is what Schrödinger intended... not for people to go putting cats in boxes xD
blacknekokun 2 years ago
That guy's eyebrows are craaaazy.
mirrorcleworld 3 years ago
on the rt hand side are 2 thumbs one up one down
due to the half life ,i think the gag is both good and bad.
tediouse 3 years ago
this is the vey kind of thing to put you off science/also this is american humour is it not!
oh year ,i live in england.
tediouse 3 years ago
Was that meant to be funny? What was funny about this video? anyway... Schrodinger's cat is Erwin Schrodinger's parodox he saw in Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. The problem with Schrodinger's cat is...The cat itself. Do you think the cat could collapse the wave function of whats in the box. I tend to think yes. So there is no paradox. Some say it's still possible to have this paradox. Even with the collapse occurring in the box. This is not some way of saying "We don't know"
MrDave73 3 years ago
I suppose the cats existence doesn't rly matter, if we adjust the experiment say so that if decay takes place it triggers a nuclear warhead in the box, then before we open the box will the warhead go off or not? because who will collapse the wave function if the box is unopened?
Retsam19 3 years ago
Schrödinger city? xD
i think the blast escaping the box would tell us, albeit for a brief fraction of a second, that decay took place xD
blacknekokun 2 years ago
lol
Retsam19 2 years ago
Isn't this just another scientific principle to help them avoid saying those three dreaded words: "We Don't Know"
When the cat is in the box, it is still only one of the two. Since there is no way prove one or the other (bar observing), it makes no sense to say it is both. It makes more sense to say it is either, and use the scientist worst nightmare "We Don't know".
I haven't observed my heart, yet can i say it's both green and yellow?
ChristmasRights 3 years ago
You idiot. I see that you dont know shit about this. Where is your evidence? Did you study this and prove?? Your a moron, just bcuz ur mind cant handle it dont just say dumb shit.
cr7kpor 3 years ago
have you ever heard abouth the teory of hugh everett
if you haven't just checkt it out perhaps you will change your opinion
if you already knew it you clearly didn't got the point
duffelear 3 years ago
yeah, name calling doesn't make one the smarter of the two...
the principle behind the cat is to illustrate how superposition is actually absurd, not to prove that both states actually exist.
Schrodinger didn't have tangible evidence either, he referred to the cat thing as a "ridiculous case" and coined to prevent just accepting blurred concepts of reality.
quantum mechanics can be a headache, Schrodinger's thing is not really hard to grasp...
ChristmasRights.. you kinda had it right =)
blacknekokun 2 years ago
my lawd who gave this guy more than 0 stars
GerhardFourie 3 years ago
What's wrong with that asshole's face?
STOP OVER ACTING!
PropellerBusted 3 years ago
lol hot scientist!! ^-^
iL0VEjohnnyramone 3 years ago
LOL best vid ever post more like this nd cud we see the punch ines its just annoying otherwise because i hate a half joke
dragonfireg 3 years ago
WANTED - Schrodinger's Cat
DEAD AND ALIVE
Last seen when box was closed.
salvo711 3 years ago 4
naive ned is so cute!
josselyn17 3 years ago
I never yawned so long in my life...>_>
comfortable1989 3 years ago
XD that was brilliant.
fucktheflaggers 3 years ago
if i know the cat is dead but alive in the same time O_O
LugiaTheGreatBeast 3 years ago
That makes perfect sense!
Zhafirin 4 years ago
ok...
fuwazzy13 4 years ago
yay dolly zoom!
betheturtle 4 years ago
I think i just learned something
donny0man 4 years ago
this is awesome I love it =)
albafreak89 4 years ago
That was funny
1212818181815 4 years ago
its absolutely cringe-worthy which is why it made me laugh. its so bad its funny. well done
amiablesnowman 4 years ago
schrodinger's cat is a matter of fact versus the philosophy of perception. great take on it bro, 4/5
link12321 4 years ago
i dont think this is funny
LANKEYUK 4 years ago
You had me laughing out loud.
Thanks for making this. That was funny.
coekyelmo 4 years ago
The problem I find with this thought experiment is that the theory states is that we cannot be sure of the state os something until we measure it. It seems to me that saying all states exist simultaneously is just an assumption. I know that we cannot measure something without interfering with it, but if I open a box to see whether the cat is alive or dead, and the cat was alive before I opened the box, just looking at it won't kill the cat.
Welcome to quamtum physics.
jsreed5 4 years ago
I wonder if the cat counts as an observer. Prob. not.
maleysnemesis 4 years ago 3
Same goes for orgasms .
elementsofstars 4 years ago
how so?
thejewsandwich 4 years ago
Be yourself !that enough for your career.
degetloo 4 years ago
The host annoyed me, his head bobbed too much and he talks funny, he's trying too much it seems, and it really only results in me wanting to punch him.
CrazyNoShoes 4 years ago
enlightening and funny, well done.
dsorr 4 years ago
i just stopped the vid once he stops talkinga bout the actual concept and went into the "joke" idea... cuz well, its a joke...
GauchoLibre 5 years ago
loved the vid
madmaxmaths 5 years ago
I'm going to shoot the next idiot who thinks a superposition of probabilities means something is simultaneously in both states. It simply means if you measure it you have a probability of finding it in one of the states.
That aside, hilarious video! 5 stars :)
Hitokiriilh 5 years ago
that confuses me... if you have measured it, then you know it, there is no probability; if you haven't measured it yet, and are supposing a probability, eg the probability of the cat being alive is 0.2 or whatever, then you are reducing schroddingers paradox to something very trivial indeed... could you explain please?... without the use of a gun please
fidocancan 5 years ago
Not really sure how that reduces the paradox to anything trivial. It's only a paradox when people try to say "the cat is in both states at once before you measure it." It's sorta like saying "if you toss a marble in an icecube tray, the marble is in all the compartments at once before you measure it." There's nothing more special about quantum than there is about probabalistic processes really.
Hitokiriilh 5 years ago
what about the wave and particle duality business...? i thought there was a simple explanation for that too, but then i saw this vid (can't find it now) which suggested light behaves differently depending on how you observe them...
fidocancan 5 years ago
The explanation typically goes as: "Particles (and light) propagate as waves and exchange energy and momentum as particles." It's not like particles are ACTUALLY waves (although it's a useful fiction to use when solving problems) but the probability of measuring it somewhere is given by a wave.
Hitokiriilh 5 years ago
Even classically, though, light travels as waves (electricity and magnetism tells us that). In quantum, it simply says light exchanges energy in discrete bits, which some take to say "hey, we can treat light as a particle when it interacts with stuff." That pretty much sums it up.
Hitokiriilh 5 years ago
Thanks for the REAL science lesson.
On a similar note, I love that Schrodinger's thought experiment was originally an attempt to show how ridiculous he thought quantum mechanics was, but today it's sort of the poster child for explaining fundamental quantum theory to the average Joe.
JasonEppink 5 years ago
im not sure how i feel about that...
Lykes311 5 years ago
Good job :D
richard833 5 years ago
If only I understood I word that little science.. thingy was attempting to say to me?
darkdecay 5 years ago