uggghhhmmmm....that sounds a lot more like ann coulter hates the troops LOL. She got so detailed ahahahahaha....toothless rapists....even the most liberal people in europe don't call US troops 'toothless rapists'
Ann Coulter is a fucking idiot. BTW - when she was interview on Canadian Television, she got owned when she tried to tell us Canadian, on Canadian Television, that we supported Viet Nam with troops. We didn't. But she insisted that we did. She looked like an uneducated moronic bitch.
Slowly, people ARE starting to realize what Fox and other media outlets are all about... It's time for the News to be News again. 3 part solution: 1. Every channel must provide a 1 hour News program WITHOUT COMMERCIALS. 2. News programs should not be rated by any Ratings system. 3. All News Channels live by the same rules, but are "Pay TV" for revenues as opposed to advertising.
Coulter's gross generalizations in this and other reports show she should not be taken seriously. (If that is in fact what she wants - As others have pointed out, she's more a performer than a political analyst). Thoughtful people do not make sweeping declarations about this group or that group. Just as one cannot assume all republicans are extremists or all Christians are nuts, or all liberals are commie pinkos.
Her statements make her look unqualified to discuss human issues in my opinion.
couldnt ann have said that and be true the democrates could dislike the soldiers and war, but vote to continue it for other reasons not obvious to us leaving ann in the right?
i think everyone all of them are ful of ish because all everyone does is blah blah blah but never do anything about or help the people do something about it
A thesis generally has about a year of research and preparation behind it. I don't think anything coming out of Coulter's mouth can reasonably be called a thesis.
LiberalViewer I have the same opinion of Ann, she's very entertaining by being completely over the top. Fox are about as fair and balanced as a Soviet court during the show trials.
Damn the democrats for trying to pull us out of Iraq, and damn democrats for trying to continue! They are clearly at fault and unanimously anti-American.
That bitch should die. She's not like Colbert. I agree with pj down there. She's a racist cunt, and a terrible person who will throw away her morals and values to help further the republican party. I don't see any motivation for these people except money and power. Terrible people.
all news is bullshit but the only one who comes close to reporting the truth is CNN msnbc is so far left they have been left behind, you can turn on fox news any time of the day and all you hear is complaining they are so far right they havent been right in years, cnn i am sure has their faults but it feels like a real news broadcast when you watch and not a bunch bitchen and moaning
Is it just me or do fixed news and the republican party seem to be loosing their minds, or do they believe we just don't have time to check out the stories. Then again they do think their audience cant distinguish between a cartoon and the news on fox.
I don't think Ann contradicted herself at all. She pointed out that Democrats are funding a war they think we are losing. Seems like the contradiction might just be with the liberals, but whos to say?
You should hear her rant on Canada as well as stating a false historical fact just because there were protesters who protested Bush's appearance in Ottawa.
Shes definitely putting on a satire, "democrats hate our troops, they think theyre toothless uneducated rapists" i think shes hilarious and its even funnier that fox news is for real in love with her and doesnt even realize shes making fun of them. The only thing thats kind of dangerous about her (and fox news) is that a lot of uneducated republicans that rely on fox for the news take her seriously. Colbert is unmistakably satirizing biased, spectacular, over the top "journalism"
yeah people need to relax on calling her a bitch. I think she wakes alot of people up on how dangerous neo cons can be....satire or not she does alot of good
I think that queenBaby makes Ann's point. Anyone who agrees with Ann or Fox News is an 'uneducated republican'. And that somehow the two are 'dangerous'. Way to bring it home.
i think you work for faux, noise they could of pulled all your videos down right now... faux noise is more than just some annoying ranting news casters, the are the OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT MEDIA OUTLET!!!! That is creepy, sort of communism like, and this guy never mentions that, he brings up "irony". Hmmm???
The ability to watch the entire hearing was available on CSPAN. Are you suggesting that the media in general actually adjusts what we see and hear. I have to snicker a little bit at that. It's not just FOX that does this. All media outlets do this in one persuasion or another.
MSNBC has commented on speeches during and or before someone took the stage. It's not uncommon in the least.
The left vs. the right is redundant and merely a show. They both do the same things period.
i personally feel that he was just being nice to her because he knows that what she said makes no sense and yes fox should have covered the questioning rather than listening to ann.
For my birthday I want Ann Coulter, Micheal Savage, and Al Sharpton to go live on their own little island and never bother us with there "Oohhh ohh, look at me and buy my book, or listen to my radio show and send me money." crap again. Oh and I also want somebody to kick Fred Phelps in the nuts and then give him a wedgie, and put a video of that on youtube.
fox news is a bias, ignorant, misleading, insensitive, unethical, hateful, disgusting, dishonorable, stupid, foolish, uneducated, ignorant(yeah, i said it again), selfish, moronic, judgmental, worthless, egomaniacal waste of time!
As opposed to impartially providing information, propaganda in its most basic sense presents information in order to influence its audience. Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or gives loaded messages in order to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented. The desired result is a change of the attitude toward the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda.
If Ms. Coulter finds it "treasonous" to question the legitimacy of government actions, I wonder how she will feel keeping her own mouth shut for the next four years...
Oh, wait! She won't, because the only legitimate government for America is a Republican one! Sorry, I forgot about that...
Also, there are multiple answers to the crossword: dumb, ugly, cunt...but i think the best is HATE, as that's what this woman personifies
no you idiot... colter is just saying that despite the democrats in congress talking against the war, they continue to vote in favor of funding it... they are just telling the ppl of america the shit they wanna hear
what body? i'd be shocked if she even has enough bod fat to be able to menstruate. on top of that, she has a skeleton face & very thin hair. she looks malnutritioned. for what it's worth, i prefer voluptuous to hearty somatypes. i'll take a size 6-14 or a size 2 any day of the week. BUT, coulter's not even on the radar. she actually looks brittle. for a woman, that's nasty
analyzed her body? no, i looked at her the way a man looks at women. she has gaunt facial features & is unattractive. to be candid, could you honestly imagine pounding on her & crashing up against her bones? (yuck) she's shapeless with no ass, titties or thighs. real women are curvy, fertile & beautiful. if i wanted to screw a woman that's built like an 9yo boy, i might as well screw a 9yo boy. believe me, that no my swing & she ain't either. but hey, that's just me. suit yourself bro
I love Obama's CABINET member picks so far. When BUSH was asked to pick his CABINET, he couldn't decide between Maple, Oak or Pine. Dumb-shit! ~Joe Voter
i don't mind when news programs cut to pundits to talk about the news. Sometimes I like the analysis. HOWEVER, Anne Culter is the worst of the worst. It's one thing to cut to a reliable source; it's completely different when you cut to some dumbass who doesn't know what she's talking about half the time. I don't care if the pundit they cut to is republican or democratic but it damn well better be somebody that will supply actual info rather than lies and stupidity
ALL the election results should keep this bleached-blond-bimbo-bitch SILENCED for years. This ugly bulimic drag queen obviously suffers from diarrhea of the mouth & constipation of the brain. What do you think about the election results Ann? Thanks for helping the Democrats out & please continue being a guest on Fox (Faux) News (along with Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly & crew), as it really seems to push the Democrats OVER the top. You're a brainless, dirty, bulimic, ugly tw*t! Regards, Sarah Failin
U can't "win" in a war that has been going for 2000 yrs...then we stuck our nose in it. Regardless of who thinks what, we dont have unlimited resources to supply to the world. We are already screwed.
the rushie neocons are sooo much like killers ronald defeo and david berkowitz that i confuse the three .. take the war .. the rushie neocons will tell you that we are winning in iraq but that we need to send more troops to cambodia & pakistan .. i mean afghanistan from iraq .. but the rushies will tell you that they can do it .. their longest war ever can be won in shortly ... diabolical ... the neocons spend $400M+ for show biz talk shows to dupe the dopes ... but they had to knock off russert
have you ever thought that one news channel is just trying to balance its own politics against the numerous other news shows that swing the complete other way, Olberman, Cafferty, Blitzer, Cooper, Rather, and Zahn for example?
I'm not a liberal (libertarian) but I just don't think that is a good enough excuse. Although bias exists in all news shows, Fox News is by and far the least fair and balanced of them all. Perhaps it is needed to 'balance out' the other stations, but, if that's the case, it does so by packing as much right wing bias into one channel as ALL the midly left leaning channels have together.
Bust how are you showing "balance" by showing the conservative opinion. They talk about the MSM being biased by being liberal, so then Fox is being biased by being conservative. What's the difference. Then, they shouldn't label themselves as "Fair and Balanced."
FOX puts Ann Coulter on because its what their viewers want to see. It has nothing to do with "bias" any more than the liberal media's use of liberal commentators on their news channels. If you want to see some real media bias, try PMSNBC or CBS, ABS, NBS and CNNBS.
Friday, January 28, 2005 - CNN founder Ted Turner calls Fox News Bush's propaganda machine. He likened the network's current popularity to Adolf Hitler's rise to power in pre-war Germany, and criticised the "dumbing down" of news which left the public uninformed of crucial issues.
Ann Coulter is a joke and a bore. I just want the facts not opinions. They don't want you to have opinions unless they have given them to you.
democrats think the troops "are toothless, illiterate rapists" did I hear that right? How could any person with half a brain continue to watch this after THAT?
Coulter clearly said that she hadn't seen the entire proceeding (and desired to see the rest)and was commenting on it based upon her information up to that point. Almost every other (liberal-biased) network tries to impugn Coulter's character rather than presenting her views objectively. That is why Fox is necessary. Liberals present that they are open-minded until someone disagrees with their agenda(s).
Ann Coulter calls herself a journalist...if she admittedly hasn't seen the entire proceeding, she should refrain from commenting on it, and FOX News CERTAINLY should not cut away from the actual hearing to cover her uninformed analysis.
His conclusions are poorly developed. Coulter always cites factual data in developing her conclusions. This is a typical example of how liberals attempt to argue a point. He should try to assemble some factual data that makes a clear point rather than stating generalizations.
It's kind of funny to accuse him of making generalizations when Coulter herself said that liberals think of our troops as "illiterate, toothless rapists." And you yourself generalize liberals in an argument about how stupid generalizations are!
Fox has a degree of bias. However, so have the major networks for decades--only in favor of the liberal perspective. Therefore, Fox's presence (although outnumbered) counterbalances some of the overwhelmingly, well-documented media liberal bias within the television and print media. The liberals' (en masse) reaction to Fox is predictable. Fox news arrived decades later than it should have. "Liberalviewer" cherry-picks (out-of context) comments made by Coulter and the Fox Anchor.
there is no 'winning and losing the war' going on in Iraq. Pres. Bush gave a declaratoin of victory, right, so why is 'winning and losing' even a topic? As far as Obama's stance, he has said repeatedly that pulling out would be a delicate situation, but he is not againist fighting terrorist. The only reason insurgents are dangerous to us is because we are there. Only 5% of the real enemy, al Queda, is in Iraq. So why are we there and not fighting the other 95% in Afghanistan, the real problem?
"Was it fair and balanced for Neil Cavuto to sum up Ann Coulter's rant as having NICELY.. punctuated the major themes"? Would it be more fair if LiberalV would show everything Ann said in that segment so that we could give a better informed answer? Also is it fair that Hillary appeared on FNC 12 hours after Shuster on MSNBC said that Clinton staffers are going to get revenge on FNC if she wins the Presidency? And isn't it ironic that Shuster has had to apologise for calling Chelsea C a whore?
YouTube's not that bad. YouTube even provides me this tool that lets me know where my video is being watched. According to the "YouTube insight" tool, this video has been watched in 12 countries in the last 5 days, in 40 countries in the last month, in 63 countries in the last 3 months, and in 68 countries in the the last 6 months. Some of my videos have an even wider audience, so I don't think I was wrong to say my audience is "the whole internet-connected world."
The Democratic Congress is not anti-war,Coulter is correct. I think she understands that the Dems are anti-Bush and anti-Republican by attacting "Bush's" war.Dems would love the war if they were waging it. It is Bush they hate.
You are completely correct in your assesment of Ann "the Man" Coulter. He/she is only interested in creating a scandal just so that the idiotic right wing nuts buy his/her books.
Ann said that the Dems want us to lose the war. She also said that they continue to fund the war and that she is skeptical about polls showing antiwar fervor. The dems DO want us to lose and they HAVE continued to fund. That way Dems can blame Bush for the war and hide the fact that they funded it many years hence. The NYT will supply them sufficient cover and the rest of the 90% Democratic press. Look at the confusion between Hillary and Obama on Obamas war position. Easily made misleading.
I haven't read the otehr almost 900 comments so mabey this has already been addressed but do other news organizations do this whether it is a bias towards republicans or democrats? This is not an accusation. I really don't know.
Alright, lets get this out of the way. Everyone has come to expect these hate rants from Coulter because anyone who is intelligent knows that she is not in the vicinity of being a journalist, but Christ almoghty, the other guy is one of there lead anchors(I presume) and he did not even question Coulter's rant claiming the Democrats are "treasonous and rapists"? That anchor is an abomination to Journalism and Coulter is just an abomination of a human.
Must have been time consuming to do...lol. What I will say is that every exculusive news channel conducts business the same way. They will pull off a hearing at different times to talk with thier analysts for comment. MSNBC and CNN do as well.
We all know it was a hard day for some liberals to swallow, but anytime we have to be at war it is bad so no side really wins.
What does it say about FOX that they rely upon the analysis provided by Mr. Coulter? If that is who they choose to represent their perspective. . .well. . .FOX must be real short on capable analysts!
Liberalviewer, it's sad that all these asshats are trying to criticize your videos with superficial, pseudo-clever observations. At least you are up front about what you are trying to communicate. It's gracious of you to even respond to abates, but frankly I can't understand why you even bother. Thanks for the vids.
I feel the same way about Ann Coulter. She doesn't offend me at all because she's all shock-value, no substance. She's one mud-pit wrestling match away from Howard Stern.
It appears you took Ann Coulter's second comments out of context. I'm guessing Ann was commenting on the hypocrisy of Democrats when they speak out against the war and then vote to keep the war funded. Ann's showing how totally inconsistent liberal Democrats are.
Are u claiming Coulter's rants could somehow be saved by context? My editing was fair and I provided my viewers a sufficient dose of Coulter to make my 2 points that
1) Coulter contradicts herself and
2) It was poor journalism to run Coulter's rant rather than the live congressional hearings, particularly while Democrats were doing the questioning
I'd be persuaded by someone who's lively like Ann Coulter than someone like you who's slow and boring. It's laughable how liberals go after Fox News for not being "Fair and Balanced." If liberals utilized their brains, they'd figure out that no one is fair and balanced. All human beings have their prejudices and biases. Just take it as a Fox News slogan and let it go instead of camping on it ad nauseum.
If u forgive the violent analogy, comparing Fox bias to other outlets is like comparing targeting civilians to collateral damage: its a matter of intent. While everything involving humans DOES have bias, most news outlets have bias towards controversy, sensationalism, and corporatism. Fox has those PLUS such clear ideological bias I was able to put together my Fox News Bias playlist at:
abates, just go sit in front of your fox box and stop bugging the people who can think for themselves. youre not gonna fool anyone watching these videos - give up.
What are your credentials that make you a person that people should listen to?...every LiberalViewer video I watch you attack these videos at every turn, citing spelling errors, as "misleading people". Ignore how LiberalViewer types his messages for a second so you can see how Fox News misleads people.
I'm not sure what motivates abates, but I don't mind helping people like him, too. And, Ive noticed he HAS learned some things, though I doubt he'd admit it. Be careful, however, in saying he is "citing spelling errors, as 'misleading people,'" b/c that opens yourself up to a claim u agree with him I made an error here. I make plenty of typos, but, in this case, I actually chose to use the root word when cutting the post down to 500 characters
LOL! I don't think an apology is really necessary for accusing someone of misspelling. I hope it hasn't gotten to that point, anyway. I guess when I put Ann Coulter in a video, I shouldnt be surprised that things would devolve to that level.
I accept your apology for "accusing [me] of mispelling." LOL!
"Ive noticed he HAS learned some things, though I doubt he'd admit it"
Oh yes, I have learned a lot. You're still generally wrong when you jump to conclusions and assume that everything that Fox does is biased, but I have learned a lot in the process of disproving you.
"I actually chose to use the root word when cutting the post down to 500 characters"
The post in question was well under 500 characters, so you did not need to cut "nicely" down to "nice."
"What are your credentials that make you a person that people should listen to?"
My arguments are my "credentials."
"you attack these videos at every turn, citing spelling errors, as 'misleading people'"
I generally start by attacking the message of his video; however, LV has a way of derailing the discussion, which is why things often degenerate into tedious exegeses of every little word he says, as he backpedals and tries to explain what he "really meant."
I have not asked for a "tedious exegeses of every little word," but, rather, I have been patiently and politely waiting for you to address my argument that my clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats, easily qualifying this video as another of the many examples of bias on my Fox News Bias playlist at
"I have been patiently and politely waiting for you to address my argument"
I have addressed it repeatedly: The clips do NOT show Fox bias, because they do not show (nor have you asserted) that Fox cut away ONLY during Democrats, or during ALL Democrats, or only cut away for conservative pundits. Nothing you showed is an example of bias.
Again, you fail to address my arg b/c I did not claim that "Fox cut away ONLY during Democrats, or during ALL Democrats, or only cut away for conservative pundits." My clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats, easily qualifying this video as another of the many examples of bias on my Fox News Bias playlist at
PS Given how you have been completely unable to address my argument for months, you might be interested in seeing how many people judge that technique to be a loser. If youre interested, look at how people answer the penultimate question on my latest video asking:
"Am I right that atheist Michael Newdow PWNed Fox News' Neil Cavuto by presenting an argument Cavuto repeatedly could not address?"
Your "argument" is a recitation of the facts of the video, not an argument. You refuse to say WHY what Fox did was biased. I have tried to help by asking for information about your definition of "bias," but you refuse to answer simple "yes or no" questions. The only part of your "argument" which is not a recitation of facts is "My clips show bias because...." That is not an argument; that is a baseless attack with no substance.
I have explained "WHY what Fox did was biased." Again, the clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats, easily qualifying this video as another of the many examples of bias on my Fox News Bias playlist at
"Again, the clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats"
Then answer this question: Why is it biased to replace footage of Democrats with commentary by Coulter attacking Democrats? If you can't answer that question, you have shown that your argument is without substance.
uggghhhmmmm....that sounds a lot more like ann coulter hates the troops LOL. She got so detailed ahahahahaha....toothless rapists....even the most liberal people in europe don't call US troops 'toothless rapists'
ProductionMarx 1 week ago in playlist Fox News Bias in Its Video Editing
Why are we still giving Coulter access to oxygen?
skoockum 6 months ago 2
Ann Coulter is a fucking idiot. BTW - when she was interview on Canadian Television, she got owned when she tried to tell us Canadian, on Canadian Television, that we supported Viet Nam with troops. We didn't. But she insisted that we did. She looked like an uneducated moronic bitch.
Bawbster1 7 months ago in playlist Fox News Bias
This has been flagged as spam show
Slowly, people ARE starting to realize what Fox and other media outlets are all about... It's time for the News to be News again. 3 part solution: 1. Every channel must provide a 1 hour News program WITHOUT COMMERCIALS. 2. News programs should not be rated by any Ratings system. 3. All News Channels live by the same rules, but are "Pay TV" for revenues as opposed to advertising.
Bawbster1 7 months ago in playlist Fox News Bias
Coulter's gross generalizations in this and other reports show she should not be taken seriously. (If that is in fact what she wants - As others have pointed out, she's more a performer than a political analyst). Thoughtful people do not make sweeping declarations about this group or that group. Just as one cannot assume all republicans are extremists or all Christians are nuts, or all liberals are commie pinkos.
Her statements make her look unqualified to discuss human issues in my opinion.
Trund27 7 months ago
couldnt ann have said that and be true the democrates could dislike the soldiers and war, but vote to continue it for other reasons not obvious to us leaving ann in the right?
i think everyone all of them are ful of ish because all everyone does is blah blah blah but never do anything about or help the people do something about it
imcrazy85 7 months ago
With Ann's triple penis???????????.
Tmetrvlr 8 months ago
A thesis generally has about a year of research and preparation behind it. I don't think anything coming out of Coulter's mouth can reasonably be called a thesis.
APocketOfTime 8 months ago
@APocketOfTime Perhaps not. Maybe a form of verbal 'feces' is more apt.
Ewww...I just grossed myself out!
Trund27 7 months ago
I'd have to agree, Ann coulter seems to be putting on a show. The scary part is that some people really believe her.
realist283 10 months ago
Another example of why anyone who thinks fox news is a legitimate news organization is a moron.
moreoreos123 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
THE USA IS NOT A MUSLIM COUNTRY.... OSAMA BIN LADEN is to be believe living in PAKISTAN right now..
PAKISTANS GOVERNMENT would protect him because they'd like to fight the US, UK, AUS, ISRAEL, AND OTHERS NON-MUSLIM COUNTRIES...
PAKISTANS MADE SECRET NUCLEAR WEAPONS TO FIGHT THE UNITED NATIONS..
I THINK WE NEED TO STOP THIS BRUTALLITY ACT., WE CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS TERRORIST COUNTRY..
PAKISTANS IS A THREAT TO THE UNITED NATIONS....and the rest of the world
poiuytrewq6641 1 year ago
LiberalViewer I have the same opinion of Ann, she's very entertaining by being completely over the top. Fox are about as fair and balanced as a Soviet court during the show trials.
Darrylizer1 1 year ago
@Darrylizer1 LoL! Great analogy.
Trund27 7 months ago
Damn the democrats for trying to pull us out of Iraq, and damn democrats for trying to continue! They are clearly at fault and unanimously anti-American.
willthack13 1 year ago
What a hateful cunt. She fits right in on this show.
pisspot55 1 year ago 3
If you don't watch the whole thing how do you comment on it?
echlfan 1 year ago
That bitch said that Canada sent troops to Vietnam. I am not American or Canadian and even I knew that Canada did not send troops to Vietnam.
IndianSettler 1 year ago 9
Remember to rate.
lotsagrapes 1 year ago
Ann Coulter has got a small dick. That's why she's so angry all the time.
mickety2001 2 years ago 38
ann coultergeist!!!
CigarStudLasVegas 1 year ago 3
That bitch should die. She's not like Colbert. I agree with pj down there. She's a racist cunt, and a terrible person who will throw away her morals and values to help further the republican party. I don't see any motivation for these people except money and power. Terrible people.
aclose78 2 years ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
Rock and Roll the meaning:
1) REACT
2) MARRIAGE then COMFORT RANK
(instant money printing, laugh prints instant, prof kid ,bit0h, 3000 days celibate, no guilt by association, cherry)
ans:Safe engineering (maple graphing) use functions for distribution.
KristinaBrooker 2 years ago
She was merely citing hypocrisy. It's ok to be confused.
EWAShock 2 years ago
she is a rascist cunt
pjicleanair420 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
Gigs1078 2 years ago
this woman is so irrelevant i cant believe a news network allows her to spout off her rants
pjicleanair420 2 years ago 5
@pjicleanair420
What are you talking about? Fox doesn't have a "news organization", and their the only network that allows her ugly mug on the air.
okplayer420 2 years ago
She loves controversy, fox is controversy
questionsamson 2 years ago 3
yup
pjicleanair420 2 years ago
all news is bullshit but the only one who comes close to reporting the truth is CNN msnbc is so far left they have been left behind, you can turn on fox news any time of the day and all you hear is complaining they are so far right they havent been right in years, cnn i am sure has their faults but it feels like a real news broadcast when you watch and not a bunch bitchen and moaning
pjicleanair420 2 years ago
i like your comment :) and the first 4 words are the best :)
rflooker 2 years ago
Snore... Oh sorry you expected me to pay attention, but you forgot that no one cares what you think
TheProudConservative 2 years ago
Is it just me or do fixed news and the republican party seem to be loosing their minds, or do they believe we just don't have time to check out the stories. Then again they do think their audience cant distinguish between a cartoon and the news on fox.
rightwingdestroyer 2 years ago 2
Hopefully that bulimic bitch will starve to death
J4N15 2 years ago
I just LOVE the way she dismisses the facts "those polls"...haha... I am in awe.
QuixoticM 2 years ago
You shouldn't take Ann Coulter seriously, it does seem she just says things to see what the reactions will be.
Remus0387 2 years ago
Coulter is an epic, epic troll.
kmvoss 2 years ago 2
Ann is a very intelligent, beautiful woman, and liberal hater her for being right.
myrangerdog 2 years ago
lol she isn't right about anything you just saw her bust her own argument
rightwingdestroyer 2 years ago 2
I don't think Ann contradicted herself at all. She pointed out that Democrats are funding a war they think we are losing. Seems like the contradiction might just be with the liberals, but whos to say?
LothairOfLorraine 2 years ago
Everytime Ann Coulter speaks God kills a republican.
mattiassollerman 2 years ago 2
LMAO..
wonton00 2 years ago
so true!
mystishae17 2 years ago
Coulter's an embarrassment to Republicans and Americans alike.
bsnxenogear 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com
kwoodward80 2 years ago
Who says the right hate gays? The neo-nazi men want to fuck ann cunter.
I know rush got some of that shemale overused flat ass.
Magnumanxxl 2 years ago
It's MANN Cunter, silly. :)
nexmires 2 years ago 3
I would fuck Ann. There, I said it.
freethinker1990 2 years ago 4
ok so you'll fuck anybody.
akvalues 2 years ago
I'd fuck her too, she's a republican so she'll swallow anything if it's big and scary enough
mystishae17 2 years ago 3
don't be hating on Colbert
bob999999999900000 2 years ago
You should hear her rant on Canada as well as stating a false historical fact just because there were protesters who protested Bush's appearance in Ottawa.
IamCanadian3333 2 years ago
I'm fairly positive that Ann Coulter is putting on a show. She's doing a satire on republicans.
EndDepravity 2 years ago
Shes definitely putting on a satire, "democrats hate our troops, they think theyre toothless uneducated rapists" i think shes hilarious and its even funnier that fox news is for real in love with her and doesnt even realize shes making fun of them. The only thing thats kind of dangerous about her (and fox news) is that a lot of uneducated republicans that rely on fox for the news take her seriously. Colbert is unmistakably satirizing biased, spectacular, over the top "journalism"
queenBABYpussy 2 years ago 2
yeah people need to relax on calling her a bitch. I think she wakes alot of people up on how dangerous neo cons can be....satire or not she does alot of good
EndDepravity 2 years ago
I think that queenBaby makes Ann's point. Anyone who agrees with Ann or Fox News is an 'uneducated republican'. And that somehow the two are 'dangerous'. Way to bring it home.
LothairOfLorraine 2 years ago
i think you work for faux, noise they could of pulled all your videos down right now... faux noise is more than just some annoying ranting news casters, the are the OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT MEDIA OUTLET!!!! That is creepy, sort of communism like, and this guy never mentions that, he brings up "irony". Hmmm???
12GaugeLosAngeles 2 years ago
best clip of coulter ever, what a douche
joshypoo79 2 years ago
I wouldn't fuck ann coulter with your dick!!
StupidVideoz 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
ANN COULTER IS GOD. FUCK LIBERALS.
BrianCB8 2 years ago
calling ann coulter a cunt is an insult to cunts everywhere.
rdb7878 2 years ago 8
haha dumb ass Ann. Proved her self wrong haha lmafo
vladimirivich 2 years ago
The ability to watch the entire hearing was available on CSPAN. Are you suggesting that the media in general actually adjusts what we see and hear. I have to snicker a little bit at that. It's not just FOX that does this. All media outlets do this in one persuasion or another.
MSNBC has commented on speeches during and or before someone took the stage. It's not uncommon in the least.
The left vs. the right is redundant and merely a show. They both do the same things period.
U2Dave 2 years ago
They should have shown the whole hearing. And after it was over, cut to whoever the pundits were and get their analysis on the whole thing.
ZodiacArrest 2 years ago
i personally feel that he was just being nice to her because he knows that what she said makes no sense and yes fox should have covered the questioning rather than listening to ann.
kirk903 2 years ago
OH SHIT! did she really just say that democrats think that soldiers are hillbilly toothless rapists??? oh fuckin shit.
zobeebobee29 2 years ago 5
I know, right?
It's a performance. It has to be. No way a woman could be so demonic.
gladius900 2 years ago 3
For my birthday I want Ann Coulter, Micheal Savage, and Al Sharpton to go live on their own little island and never bother us with there "Oohhh ohh, look at me and buy my book, or listen to my radio show and send me money." crap again. Oh and I also want somebody to kick Fred Phelps in the nuts and then give him a wedgie, and put a video of that on youtube.
fullmetalfunk 2 years ago
Hey, it's Neil Abercrombie! He's our representative. He has actually started his campaign for governor of Hawaii.
LiberalViewer, you should talk about the crazies at Conservapedia sometime. Good Lord...
obentomusubi 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bill o'relilly is a propagating fool.
fox news is a bias, ignorant, misleading, insensitive, unethical, hateful, disgusting, dishonorable, stupid, foolish, uneducated, ignorant(yeah, i said it again), selfish, moronic, judgmental, worthless, egomaniacal waste of time!
basically...fox news is bad.
stop watching fox news people!
justPLAINolEZ 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You are doing the same thing Fox News does. You are just fighting spin with spin.
iloveemokid21ohio 2 years ago
Pointing out what is actually happening is not called spin, it's called the truth.
dc013 2 years ago 9
i know what u mean but i really feel he's just trying to show whats going on even though he is very obvious liberal
saynotodrug999 2 years ago
As opposed to impartially providing information, propaganda in its most basic sense presents information in order to influence its audience. Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or gives loaded messages in order to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented. The desired result is a change of the attitude toward the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda.
Tali999 2 years ago
This fucking woman is a sick piece of shit. It is obvious that she hates herself and anyone else that doesn't espouse her sick views.
She is almost certainly a Lesbian, who hates herself. Come out Coulter bitch, you'll feel better about your sick self..............
lookseeme21 3 years ago 3
Now you've demeaned lesbians by associating them with her.
MatthiasFarland 2 years ago 5
God, I hate that woman.
MutantG 3 years ago 5
So does God, I'm sure.
PartIrishKevo 2 years ago 2
Anncoulter scares me! lol seriously she's so stupid!
kuwaimaha 3 years ago
If Ms. Coulter finds it "treasonous" to question the legitimacy of government actions, I wonder how she will feel keeping her own mouth shut for the next four years...
Oh, wait! She won't, because the only legitimate government for America is a Republican one! Sorry, I forgot about that...
Also, there are multiple answers to the crossword: dumb, ugly, cunt...but i think the best is HATE, as that's what this woman personifies
trista86 3 years ago 2
I remember that headline in the NYT.
"We hate our illiterate, toothless rapist troops. It was right next to the crossword puzzle. By the way, what's a four letter word for Ann Coulter?"
Johnbizzen 3 years ago
cunt! haha
peopleareapes 3 years ago
thank you liberal viewer. your intelligence is a refreshing breath of air. keep on provoking thoughts!!
hinikemo 3 years ago
This guy is a REAL lawyer, unlike Coulter.
ninjanerd8 3 years ago
no you idiot... colter is just saying that despite the democrats in congress talking against the war, they continue to vote in favor of funding it... they are just telling the ppl of america the shit they wanna hear
fallenskater613 3 years ago
a cunt can be useful, coulter does'nt even fit that bill
littlegraigue 3 years ago
Hey, Coulter is worth fucking, not listening to...
Morgoth295 3 years ago
neither. she's gross
upabittoolate 3 years ago
gross words, not body...
Morgoth295 3 years ago
what body? i'd be shocked if she even has enough bod fat to be able to menstruate. on top of that, she has a skeleton face & very thin hair. she looks malnutritioned. for what it's worth, i prefer voluptuous to hearty somatypes. i'll take a size 6-14 or a size 2 any day of the week. BUT, coulter's not even on the radar. she actually looks brittle. for a woman, that's nasty
upabittoolate 3 years ago
Woooooooooooooooow, you analyzed her body?
Do you seriously have nothing better to do?
Lolz...
Morgoth295 3 years ago
analyzed her body? no, i looked at her the way a man looks at women. she has gaunt facial features & is unattractive. to be candid, could you honestly imagine pounding on her & crashing up against her bones? (yuck) she's shapeless with no ass, titties or thighs. real women are curvy, fertile & beautiful. if i wanted to screw a woman that's built like an 9yo boy, i might as well screw a 9yo boy. believe me, that no my swing & she ain't either. but hey, that's just me. suit yourself bro
upabittoolate 3 years ago
Omg, can you not see sarcasm?...
Morgoth295 3 years ago
most sarcasm is hard to read in this medium. also, there are quite a few lunatics that think she's attractive.
upabittoolate 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love Obama's CABINET member picks so far. When BUSH was asked to pick his CABINET, he couldn't decide between Maple, Oak or Pine. Dumb-shit! ~Joe Voter
Obama ties with Ayers - 0 KILLED.
Bush ties w/Iraq (after lies) - 4200+ KILLED.
mavrek47 3 years ago 2
i don't mind when news programs cut to pundits to talk about the news. Sometimes I like the analysis. HOWEVER, Anne Culter is the worst of the worst. It's one thing to cut to a reliable source; it's completely different when you cut to some dumbass who doesn't know what she's talking about half the time. I don't care if the pundit they cut to is republican or democratic but it damn well better be somebody that will supply actual info rather than lies and stupidity
LovesBoyswithBoys 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL the election results should keep this bleached-blond-bimbo-bitch SILENCED for years. This ugly bulimic drag queen obviously suffers from diarrhea of the mouth & constipation of the brain. What do you think about the election results Ann? Thanks for helping the Democrats out & please continue being a guest on Fox (Faux) News (along with Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly & crew), as it really seems to push the Democrats OVER the top. You're a brainless, dirty, bulimic, ugly tw*t! Regards, Sarah Failin
mavrek47 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ann Coulter speaks the 100% unadulterated truth.
KinglyNumbaOne 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LiberalViewer, I weep for your future, lol.
Z28Jerry 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Here are some other people that take over all the airwaves like Obama did last night:
Fidel, Saddam, Hugo Chavez, Hitler..
See where I m going with this...
Stay Poor and Ignorant. Vote Democrat.
partybuddys 3 years ago
i love Stephen Colbert
AshNekoBoy 3 years ago 2
haaahahaaha! fox 5 news is fail. Keep up the vids
kakashiUzamaki 3 years ago 3
"Colbert character"
Yeah, maybe..but Colbert does it for laughs and happiness..or so I assume
This bitch doesn't
but yeah
this cunt is just stupid.
JamesLeron 3 years ago 9
U can't "win" in a war that has been going for 2000 yrs...then we stuck our nose in it. Regardless of who thinks what, we dont have unlimited resources to supply to the world. We are already screwed.
mand1sh3p 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i love how liberals all bullshit that any smart conservatives are just jokes when they make jokes out of them selves by spinning news all the time
comotose762 3 years ago
With all this romanticized, overexaggerated bullshit, it's no wonder that most Americans are so apathetic...
ownage1810 3 years ago 2
I CONCURR
bigtiggerpaws 3 years ago
Another name that people in the military call him is Betrayus
chocolatebubblegum11 3 years ago
"Toothless Rapists" I want to get whatever paper she's getting! My newspaper never mentions toothless rapists. =(
ctastrophe 3 years ago 3
the rushie neocons are sooo much like killers ronald defeo and david berkowitz that i confuse the three .. take the war .. the rushie neocons will tell you that we are winning in iraq but that we need to send more troops to cambodia & pakistan .. i mean afghanistan from iraq .. but the rushies will tell you that they can do it .. their longest war ever can be won in shortly ... diabolical ... the neocons spend $400M+ for show biz talk shows to dupe the dopes ... but they had to knock off russert
AgnesBojaxhiu2000 3 years ago
have you ever thought that one news channel is just trying to balance its own politics against the numerous other news shows that swing the complete other way, Olberman, Cafferty, Blitzer, Cooper, Rather, and Zahn for example?
mikerogan 3 years ago
I'm not a liberal (libertarian) but I just don't think that is a good enough excuse. Although bias exists in all news shows, Fox News is by and far the least fair and balanced of them all. Perhaps it is needed to 'balance out' the other stations, but, if that's the case, it does so by packing as much right wing bias into one channel as ALL the midly left leaning channels have together.
elmosfire1212 3 years ago 4
Not to mention, why bother using the phrase, "Fair and Balanced"?
rakrobn 3 years ago
Bust how are you showing "balance" by showing the conservative opinion. They talk about the MSM being biased by being liberal, so then Fox is being biased by being conservative. What's the difference. Then, they shouldn't label themselves as "Fair and Balanced."
rakrobn 3 years ago
FOX puts Ann Coulter on because its what their viewers want to see. It has nothing to do with "bias" any more than the liberal media's use of liberal commentators on their news channels. If you want to see some real media bias, try PMSNBC or CBS, ABS, NBS and CNNBS.
SCOBO111 3 years ago
Oh yeah and you saying, "PMSNBC" that's not biased. That's just as stupid as saying, "Fox Noise" or "Faux Noise".
rakrobn 3 years ago
Friday, January 28, 2005 - CNN founder Ted Turner calls Fox News Bush's propaganda machine. He likened the network's current popularity to Adolf Hitler's rise to power in pre-war Germany, and criticised the "dumbing down" of news which left the public uninformed of crucial issues.
Ann Coulter is a joke and a bore. I just want the facts not opinions. They don't want you to have opinions unless they have given them to you.
hamburglerz77 3 years ago
"daily treason" for shame Ann..
Fox always too ready to call out "Un-American!" what will they do when Bush is out of office?
scoreJ6 3 years ago
ann is a bonzo wanna be!
abolof 3 years ago
Fox is sending subliminal messages. D:
Thanks LiberalMedia!
peasiz3d 3 years ago
I can't believe you've spent even as much time as you have considering Ann Coulter's "personality". She's tits on a stick. That's. It.
SnarkLicker 3 years ago
democrats think the troops "are toothless, illiterate rapists" did I hear that right? How could any person with half a brain continue to watch this after THAT?
griff297 3 years ago 2
It's FUNNY! that's why. like LiberalViwer said, she's like Stephen Colbert. I have serious doubts she's actually republican.
DStecks 3 years ago 2
I'd like to think that, but I just can't see her as anything but pure evil.
elmosfire1212 3 years ago
LiberalViewer,
Do you have a link to video of the full hearing?
Thanks.
mgefantom 3 years ago
americans dug they're ditch, sleep in it IMO
tksmkwd 3 years ago
Fuck ann coulter she is a traitor and a pice of shit
tawneestone1890 3 years ago
I am shocked. Fox news embodies everything that's wrong with America, and everything I hate as well.
DeusMortemEst 3 years ago 5
Hear hear.
pf126p 3 years ago 2
Coulter clearly said that she hadn't seen the entire proceeding (and desired to see the rest)and was commenting on it based upon her information up to that point. Almost every other (liberal-biased) network tries to impugn Coulter's character rather than presenting her views objectively. That is why Fox is necessary. Liberals present that they are open-minded until someone disagrees with their agenda(s).
intohotyungjocks 3 years ago
"...Presenting views objectively.
Isn't that a paradox?
pf126p 3 years ago
Ann Coulter calls herself a journalist...if she admittedly hasn't seen the entire proceeding, she should refrain from commenting on it, and FOX News CERTAINLY should not cut away from the actual hearing to cover her uninformed analysis.
mgefantom 3 years ago
His conclusions are poorly developed. Coulter always cites factual data in developing her conclusions. This is a typical example of how liberals attempt to argue a point. He should try to assemble some factual data that makes a clear point rather than stating generalizations.
intohotyungjocks 3 years ago
It's kind of funny to accuse him of making generalizations when Coulter herself said that liberals think of our troops as "illiterate, toothless rapists." And you yourself generalize liberals in an argument about how stupid generalizations are!
TheDefenestrater 3 years ago 3
Fox has a degree of bias. However, so have the major networks for decades--only in favor of the liberal perspective. Therefore, Fox's presence (although outnumbered) counterbalances some of the overwhelmingly, well-documented media liberal bias within the television and print media. The liberals' (en masse) reaction to Fox is predictable. Fox news arrived decades later than it should have. "Liberalviewer" cherry-picks (out-of context) comments made by Coulter and the Fox Anchor.
intohotyungjocks 3 years ago
Well said my friend! Totally agree. Fox News is a joke!
bfachada 4 years ago
there is no 'winning and losing the war' going on in Iraq. Pres. Bush gave a declaratoin of victory, right, so why is 'winning and losing' even a topic? As far as Obama's stance, he has said repeatedly that pulling out would be a delicate situation, but he is not againist fighting terrorist. The only reason insurgents are dangerous to us is because we are there. Only 5% of the real enemy, al Queda, is in Iraq. So why are we there and not fighting the other 95% in Afghanistan, the real problem?
xe07 4 years ago
"Was it fair and balanced for Neil Cavuto to sum up Ann Coulter's rant as having NICELY.. punctuated the major themes"? Would it be more fair if LiberalV would show everything Ann said in that segment so that we could give a better informed answer? Also is it fair that Hillary appeared on FNC 12 hours after Shuster on MSNBC said that Clinton staffers are going to get revenge on FNC if she wins the Presidency? And isn't it ironic that Shuster has had to apologise for calling Chelsea C a whore?
prrolg 4 years ago
Btw ,YouTube is not a very important website.You aren't really reaching anyone. "audience is the whole ...world,ha ha)
prrolg 4 years ago
prrolg,
YouTube's not that bad. YouTube even provides me this tool that lets me know where my video is being watched. According to the "YouTube insight" tool, this video has been watched in 12 countries in the last 5 days, in 40 countries in the last month, in 63 countries in the last 3 months, and in 68 countries in the the last 6 months. Some of my videos have an even wider audience, so I don't think I was wrong to say my audience is "the whole internet-connected world."
Thx 4 commenting :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
"Show me a prominent liberal pundit who results to petty name calling" Keith f'ing Olbermann rings a very clear bell.
prrolg 4 years ago
The Democratic Congress is not anti-war,Coulter is correct. I think she understands that the Dems are anti-Bush and anti-Republican by attacting "Bush's" war.Dems would love the war if they were waging it. It is Bush they hate.
prrolg 4 years ago
You are completely correct in your assesment of Ann "the Man" Coulter. He/she is only interested in creating a scandal just so that the idiotic right wing nuts buy his/her books.
lifter1204 4 years ago
Ann said that the Dems want us to lose the war. She also said that they continue to fund the war and that she is skeptical about polls showing antiwar fervor. The dems DO want us to lose and they HAVE continued to fund. That way Dems can blame Bush for the war and hide the fact that they funded it many years hence. The NYT will supply them sufficient cover and the rest of the 90% Democratic press. Look at the confusion between Hillary and Obama on Obamas war position. Easily made misleading.
prrolg 4 years ago
I haven't read the otehr almost 900 comments so mabey this has already been addressed but do other news organizations do this whether it is a bias towards republicans or democrats? This is not an accusation. I really don't know.
adpr08 4 years ago
I really try not to hate anyone in this world...but at this exact moment, I hate Ann Coulter.
nikola420 4 years ago
Alright, lets get this out of the way. Everyone has come to expect these hate rants from Coulter because anyone who is intelligent knows that she is not in the vicinity of being a journalist, but Christ almoghty, the other guy is one of there lead anchors(I presume) and he did not even question Coulter's rant claiming the Democrats are "treasonous and rapists"? That anchor is an abomination to Journalism and Coulter is just an abomination of a human.
larma7 4 years ago
Must have been time consuming to do...lol. What I will say is that every exculusive news channel conducts business the same way. They will pull off a hearing at different times to talk with thier analysts for comment. MSNBC and CNN do as well.
We all know it was a hard day for some liberals to swallow, but anytime we have to be at war it is bad so no side really wins.
r8erfanforlife 4 years ago
What does it say about FOX that they rely upon the analysis provided by Mr. Coulter? If that is who they choose to represent their perspective. . .well. . .FOX must be real short on capable analysts!
pr0t0color 4 years ago
LiberalViewer maybe you should read one of her books. Your far left opinions are clouding your vision. a.k.a. bias against anything Fox News says.
xleax 4 years ago
Liberalviewer, it's sad that all these asshats are trying to criticize your videos with superficial, pseudo-clever observations. At least you are up front about what you are trying to communicate. It's gracious of you to even respond to abates, but frankly I can't understand why you even bother. Thanks for the vids.
cfreyja23 4 years ago
I feel the same way about Ann Coulter. She doesn't offend me at all because she's all shock-value, no substance. She's one mud-pit wrestling match away from Howard Stern.
cfreyja23 4 years ago
It appears you took Ann Coulter's second comments out of context. I'm guessing Ann was commenting on the hypocrisy of Democrats when they speak out against the war and then vote to keep the war funded. Ann's showing how totally inconsistent liberal Democrats are.
wholearmor61018 4 years ago
wholearmor61018,
Are u claiming Coulter's rants could somehow be saved by context? My editing was fair and I provided my viewers a sufficient dose of Coulter to make my 2 points that
1) Coulter contradicts herself and
2) It was poor journalism to run Coulter's rant rather than the live congressional hearings, particularly while Democrats were doing the questioning
Thx 4 commenting :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
I'd be persuaded by someone who's lively like Ann Coulter than someone like you who's slow and boring. It's laughable how liberals go after Fox News for not being "Fair and Balanced." If liberals utilized their brains, they'd figure out that no one is fair and balanced. All human beings have their prejudices and biases. Just take it as a Fox News slogan and let it go instead of camping on it ad nauseum.
wholearmor61018 4 years ago
wholearmor61018 ,
If u forgive the violent analogy, comparing Fox bias to other outlets is like comparing targeting civilians to collateral damage: its a matter of intent. While everything involving humans DOES have bias, most news outlets have bias towards controversy, sensationalism, and corporatism. Fox has those PLUS such clear ideological bias I was able to put together my Fox News Bias playlist at:
tinyurl(.)com/299z37
Thx 4 comments :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
She Has Every Right To Say What She Wishes.Thats Good??right??
gtrgyro 4 years ago
Why does Fox bring her on to comment? Thesis? Her opinion is driven by hate and hate only! She is a joke and often sounds like a terrorist.
larma7 4 years ago
abates, just go sit in front of your fox box and stop bugging the people who can think for themselves. youre not gonna fool anyone watching these videos - give up.
Pelonetillo 4 years ago
Abates,
What are your credentials that make you a person that people should listen to?...every LiberalViewer video I watch you attack these videos at every turn, citing spelling errors, as "misleading people". Ignore how LiberalViewer types his messages for a second so you can see how Fox News misleads people.
RockIsNot4TheDevil 4 years ago
RockIsNot4TheDevil,
I'm not sure what motivates abates, but I don't mind helping people like him, too. And, Ive noticed he HAS learned some things, though I doubt he'd admit it. Be careful, however, in saying he is "citing spelling errors, as 'misleading people,'" b/c that opens yourself up to a claim u agree with him I made an error here. I make plenty of typos, but, in this case, I actually chose to use the root word when cutting the post down to 500 characters
Thx 4 the support :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
Yeah no problem. Sorry, didn't mean to make it seem like I am accusing you of mispelling and whatnot. Keep the vids coming.
RockIsNot4TheDevil 4 years ago
RockIsNot4TheDevil,
LOL! I don't think an apology is really necessary for accusing someone of misspelling. I hope it hasn't gotten to that point, anyway. I guess when I put Ann Coulter in a video, I shouldnt be surprised that things would devolve to that level.
I accept your apology for "accusing [me] of mispelling." LOL!
Thx 4 the nice comments :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
"Ive noticed he HAS learned some things, though I doubt he'd admit it"
Oh yes, I have learned a lot. You're still generally wrong when you jump to conclusions and assume that everything that Fox does is biased, but I have learned a lot in the process of disproving you.
"I actually chose to use the root word when cutting the post down to 500 characters"
The post in question was well under 500 characters, so you did not need to cut "nicely" down to "nice."
abates17 4 years ago
"What are your credentials that make you a person that people should listen to?"
My arguments are my "credentials."
"you attack these videos at every turn, citing spelling errors, as 'misleading people'"
I generally start by attacking the message of his video; however, LV has a way of derailing the discussion, which is why things often degenerate into tedious exegeses of every little word he says, as he backpedals and tries to explain what he "really meant."
abates17 4 years ago
abates,
I have not asked for a "tedious exegeses of every little word," but, rather, I have been patiently and politely waiting for you to address my argument that my clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats, easily qualifying this video as another of the many examples of bias on my Fox News Bias playlist at
tinyurl(.)com/yq6vuf
Thx 4 comment :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
"I have been patiently and politely waiting for you to address my argument"
I have addressed it repeatedly: The clips do NOT show Fox bias, because they do not show (nor have you asserted) that Fox cut away ONLY during Democrats, or during ALL Democrats, or only cut away for conservative pundits. Nothing you showed is an example of bias.
abates17 4 years ago
abates,
Again, you fail to address my arg b/c I did not claim that "Fox cut away ONLY during Democrats, or during ALL Democrats, or only cut away for conservative pundits." My clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats, easily qualifying this video as another of the many examples of bias on my Fox News Bias playlist at
tinyurl(.)com/yq6vuf
Thx 4 comment :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
PS Given how you have been completely unable to address my argument for months, you might be interested in seeing how many people judge that technique to be a loser. If youre interested, look at how people answer the penultimate question on my latest video asking:
"Am I right that atheist Michael Newdow PWNed Fox News' Neil Cavuto by presenting an argument Cavuto repeatedly could not address?"
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
"Again, you fail to address my arg"
Your "argument" is a recitation of the facts of the video, not an argument. You refuse to say WHY what Fox did was biased. I have tried to help by asking for information about your definition of "bias," but you refuse to answer simple "yes or no" questions. The only part of your "argument" which is not a recitation of facts is "My clips show bias because...." That is not an argument; that is a baseless attack with no substance.
abates17 4 years ago
abates,
I have explained "WHY what Fox did was biased." Again, the clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats, easily qualifying this video as another of the many examples of bias on my Fox News Bias playlist at
tinyurl(.)com/yq6vuf
Thx 4 comment :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
"Again, the clips show bias b/c Fox REPLACED what the Democrats were actually saying during a live news event w/Coulter's parody of punditry attacking Democrats"
Then answer this question: Why is it biased to replace footage of Democrats with commentary by Coulter attacking Democrats? If you can't answer that question, you have shown that your argument is without substance.
abates17 4 years ago
If you won't see that the answer to your question is self-evident, then you have shown that you're just being deliberately difficult.
BirdieRumia 4 years ago