Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
so stupid !!
OBSONCEN 8 months ago
no because no
1A2B43C 8 months ago
adamwerner@ ..Oops, I stand corrected Julia "Child." Thanks for the tip.
jdollinter 8 months ago
Not funny. Is this Julie Powell, the women who exploited Julia Child's work without her permission? This latest generation doesn't have a clue about the real Julia Childs and think she looks and acts like Meryl Streep. Anyone can do these recipes, not just the self exalted Julie Powell, that was the whole point. Read Julia Child's books, they are far more rewarding.
jdollinter 9 months ago
@jdollinter I kind of agree with you, but if you really want to taken seriously when making an argument about Julia Child, at least get her name correct, it's CHILD not CHILDS. There is not now nor has there even been an S in her name. Thank you.
adamwerner 8 months ago
nice hair
rockbscene 10 months ago
iS THIS THE GIRL THAT WROTE THE BOOK JULIA AND JULIE?
TheManololadynyc 1 year ago
yes lol, why?
Zanadu95 1 year ago
Really i have no idea....hmmm?
maybe because it is shorter!
Zanadu95 2 years ago
How is it that this one has more views than the first one? LOL!
Phantomguy92 2 years ago