I love the interviews by the way, keep 'em going because I really think the player interviews are the better part of the Duel School experience. Keep it up Fitz!
So now there will five turns added to the current duel; why not just keep going someone wins and if that doesn't work then why not go by the person's torment record if some has won 5 and another won 6 the 6 beats five. It would keep people on their toes if done right. Now 0 vs 0 when does that ever happen when a monster is 0 then there is a reason why so why make that rule also the prisma effect doesn't effect me at all I am just glad my cyber dragon is back at 3 where it needs to be
Mukus Yolk is a monster with 0 atk and can attack your opp. directly, Each time it does battle damage it gains 1000 atk! However attacking for zero is not considered battle damage so in order to gain additional atk points from his own effect you must first boost its atk with, say a spell card...
The new draw ruling I have a problem with.Since there is no time limit on how long a player can take to make his/her move if I am losing and I have 5 minutes if play left then I'll just wait it out and say I'm thinking about what play to make
WOW! It took them forever and a day to get the 0 vs. 0 going as well as Prisma is a Cost.
Been on them about this for the longest of longest times. Finally!!
Attack with nothing against someone who has nothing to attack back with means we both get destroyed by nothing never made sense to me. Now if only they can fix Spirit Reaper to work the right way.
The Win, Loss, or Draw was around from the beginning but was never used in tourneys for some strange reason. Now it is.
@themangafrak Long story short (too late), Spirit Reaper & Reaper on the Nightmare (as informed by a UDE player/Judge/Translator) had nothing to do with doing Battle Damage for the Discard effect to work. Look at cards like X-Sabre Airbellum and compare it to those two. Spirit Reaper/on the Nightmare just stated that it had to attack directly so it could hit under Waboku and remove Spirits from hand.
Was informed that this has been changed in the OCG to now say on the card Battle Damage.
@Dishinshoryuken hmm I see,Though I thought thats how they wanted it to work.
so I didnt see that as broken or wrong.I ussauly use goblin zombie forthe ffect of discarding.I use spirit reaper in those same instances,So it never struck me as important to note the difference.
@shinfitz having player interviews should come hand in hand with an episode of duel school,And try to focus more on the guys playing habits(such as favorite stradigies and decks) as well as what he thought of the tournement.
The guy you interviewed here (which doesnt know how hard zombies can get sense hes never met me/The Zombie King!)
We know what he went up agianst but have no idea of how he fared.We only know he used x-sabers.So try to get more on the guy your interviewing.
The new rulings are pretty standard really. Though when they mentioned 0 Atk vs 0 Atk I honestly thought that it was a joke. Honestly that is breaking the game. They are changing a basic mechanic of the game that has been around for years.
Not really. If you think about it logically, if a monster with 0 ATK points attacks the opponent directly, it doesn't do 0 damage but it does no damage at all. So If you take into account that it can not do damage, then it is logical to assume that it can not kill a monster.
@bjjartist Not in the liberal sense of the phrase as in like a card is game breaking, but by the ruling breaking a rule in the game. What I mean is that the rule that when two monsters with equal attack, attack into each other has been around since the dawn of the game and this ruling breaks it. It makes no sense.
ZOMBIES FTWWWWWWWWWW
HexSlingar 1 year ago
I love the interviews by the way, keep 'em going because I really think the player interviews are the better part of the Duel School experience. Keep it up Fitz!
savior9288 1 year ago
@ 1:26 (about the 0 ATK monsters not being destroyed in battle with each other, "I like that one!"
savior9288 1 year ago
the guy you interviewed is from my locals lol
TheSgtferg 1 year ago
I miss the intro!
TheSgtferg 1 year ago
Nothing gamebreaking, in all my career only I time that would would change anything, was when we both had a Cyber Valleys in ATK on the field.
hiddeninthemist 1 year ago
So now there will five turns added to the current duel; why not just keep going someone wins and if that doesn't work then why not go by the person's torment record if some has won 5 and another won 6 the 6 beats five. It would keep people on their toes if done right. Now 0 vs 0 when does that ever happen when a monster is 0 then there is a reason why so why make that rule also the prisma effect doesn't effect me at all I am just glad my cyber dragon is back at 3 where it needs to be
ItsAlandorAnderson 1 year ago
i like the new interview style, and the new rul;ings dont make much of a diffrence except the 5 turn one. i love that one. keep makin good vids!!
yugiohmaster1996 1 year ago
Mukus Yolk is a monster with 0 atk and can attack your opp. directly, Each time it does battle damage it gains 1000 atk! However attacking for zero is not considered battle damage so in order to gain additional atk points from his own effect you must first boost its atk with, say a spell card...
NFEast 1 year ago
@NFEast Wait you have to do that? not that its a problem sense the decks i would use with mukus are equip card heavy (psykick/powertooldragon)
themangafrak 1 year ago
The new draw ruling I have a problem with.Since there is no time limit on how long a player can take to make his/her move if I am losing and I have 5 minutes if play left then I'll just wait it out and say I'm thinking about what play to make
Groudie101 1 year ago
@Groudie101 Shades of stallaway. Sure if you suck then why not?
1acroyear1 1 year ago
0 ATK vs 0 ATK is how it works in the OCG, hence the change. I always figured Prisma was assumed due to his new wording in GLD3.
PsychicKid 1 year ago
0 vs 0 why they are both in attack mode so by the yugioh handbook they would be destroyed wtf???
shadowfox4562 1 year ago
@shadowfox4562 But this is Konami, they make the handbook.
desfrogforgame 1 year ago
@shadowfox4562 Because 0 = nothing. 0 damage = no battle damage. Why would you even ask?
1acroyear1 1 year ago
LOL at 0:45 thats me..........why the F$%K do i keep touching my wallet????....O wells
CrimsonRyukill 1 year ago
WOW! It took them forever and a day to get the 0 vs. 0 going as well as Prisma is a Cost.
Been on them about this for the longest of longest times. Finally!!
Attack with nothing against someone who has nothing to attack back with means we both get destroyed by nothing never made sense to me. Now if only they can fix Spirit Reaper to work the right way.
The Win, Loss, or Draw was around from the beginning but was never used in tourneys for some strange reason. Now it is.
Dishinshoryuken 1 year ago
@Dishinshoryuken How does spirit reaper Not "work the right way"?
He isnt destroyed by battle and he is instantly destroyed be beeing targeted by effects.whats so confusing or broken abut that?
themangafrak 1 year ago
@themangafrak Long story short (too late), Spirit Reaper & Reaper on the Nightmare (as informed by a UDE player/Judge/Translator) had nothing to do with doing Battle Damage for the Discard effect to work. Look at cards like X-Sabre Airbellum and compare it to those two. Spirit Reaper/on the Nightmare just stated that it had to attack directly so it could hit under Waboku and remove Spirits from hand.
Was informed that this has been changed in the OCG to now say on the card Battle Damage.
Dishinshoryuken 1 year ago
@Dishinshoryuken hmm I see,Though I thought thats how they wanted it to work.
so I didnt see that as broken or wrong.I ussauly use goblin zombie forthe ffect of discarding.I use spirit reaper in those same instances,So it never struck me as important to note the difference.
themangafrak 1 year ago
Five turns in time, that's good to note. Idk about the interview style, seems the same as what most interviews do :P
iamsixxy 1 year ago
@iamsixxy
So, interviews where I ask questions and they answer them doesn't really work?
Ha ha, I actually misspoke. I wanted to know if viewers liked the idea of the 'player interview' at all anymore.
Sixxy.... you silly guy, you. =p
shinfitz 1 year ago
@shinfitz having player interviews should come hand in hand with an episode of duel school,And try to focus more on the guys playing habits(such as favorite stradigies and decks) as well as what he thought of the tournement.
The guy you interviewed here (which doesnt know how hard zombies can get sense hes never met me/The Zombie King!)
We know what he went up agianst but have no idea of how he fared.We only know he used x-sabers.So try to get more on the guy your interviewing.
themangafrak 1 year ago
@shinfitz Hahah yes I like interviews :P
iamsixxy 1 year ago
holy crap, look at that grill.
SipherothXIII 1 year ago
i heard that about this and i think it is going to be everywhere, i heard it where i usually play
IrishPikachu 1 year ago
darn no scapegoat suicide...
CoolCarl222 1 year ago
The prisma thing was anounced at nats and the 5 min thing is good
Tlundy11 1 year ago
i think it is cool
monarch2500 1 year ago
zombies are a hard match for sabers think again buddy
TeamGlance 1 year ago
thanks :)
holyfukballz 1 year ago
I laughed at the second rule. Sounds pointless to me, but oh well.
DigitalPandaTech 1 year ago
The new rulings are pretty standard really. Though when they mentioned 0 Atk vs 0 Atk I honestly thought that it was a joke. Honestly that is breaking the game. They are changing a basic mechanic of the game that has been around for years.
NvrMisSniper 1 year ago
@NvrMisSniper
Not really. If you think about it logically, if a monster with 0 ATK points attacks the opponent directly, it doesn't do 0 damage but it does no damage at all. So If you take into account that it can not do damage, then it is logical to assume that it can not kill a monster.
Relentify 1 year ago
@NvrMisSniper game-breaking how... please explain?
bjjartist 1 year ago
@bjjartist Not in the liberal sense of the phrase as in like a card is game breaking, but by the ruling breaking a rule in the game. What I mean is that the rule that when two monsters with equal attack, attack into each other has been around since the dawn of the game and this ruling breaks it. It makes no sense.
NvrMisSniper 1 year ago