Rachel Maddow Invites Whiney, Cowardly Conservative Republicans To Come On Her Show

[jrwel14]

Why does the right hate Rachel? because she speaks the truth about them!

[braindeadliberals]

leftards, leftards, I see why it's called "madcow" disease.

[franciman2]

@braindeadliberals As someone who isn't involved in either 'side'(I'm not from the US) I'm curious to know why you say that? I mean in regards to this particular video.

[jrwel14]

@braindeadliberals You seem to have it!

[birthdaythesuit00]

Videos like this make me laugh. She is inviting people to talk on her show, but every time Bill'O gets a liberal on his show, he is made to look like an idiot. Con's don't want to show up, because when it's game time they can't perform.

[VoidedMirror]

"Olbermann and Maddow are covering up the truth, but we refuse to go on their shows to tell you the truth!" Genius.

[fionamcampbell]

those conservatives who refused to be on the show are afraid their ignorance is revealed before the presence of Rachel.

[phizuzz]

Rachel would have a field day with them and they know it. The tea party's weakness is facts and knowledge.

[AR15fan]

The Rachel MadCow Show A.K.A. The Dyke Van Dick Show.

[Asperuaca]

@AR15fan Making fun of her "alleged" sexuality makes you sound intelligent. Try again troll

[RaptorClaws24]

@AR15fan  Bitterness is so unattractive, that's why all the ladies want Rachel Maddow. She's smart, successful, and doesn't live in her parents basement to boot! Call her names all you want, but at the end of the day Rachel has won by simply laughing people like you off.

[AR15fan]

@RaptorClaws24 What's more unattractive is running into Madcow's man-like mug at night. It's something that nightmares are made of and enough to make you lose your lunch. LOL!

[jrwel14]

@AR15fan What's more unattractive? A jerk like you who is an Army wannabe!

[optionsupdate]

Rachel Maddow is a communist puppet, she attacks true patriots and pushed forward the satanic socialist agenda, she is also anti Christian

[RaptorClaws24]

@optionsupdate Which true patriots do you think you're talking about? What about Rachel is leading toward a Satanic agenda? Also, to be totally anti-Christian you'd also have to be anti-Satan because Satan is a Christian archetype of evil, therefor a piece of the same religion. Satanism is just as much a baby of Christianity as Mormonism, ergo she can't be both anti-Christian and a Satan worshiper. Also, communism and socialism are not the same thing and shouldn't be used interchangeably..

[franciman2]

@optionsupdate Wow what hard hitting facts!

[whiteliberal1]

Rachel's producer in the middle has a nice..............

[sage0857]

Sarah Palin (especially) and these other RepubliCUNTs don't have the balls to come on rachel's show. Rachel will mop the floor with the crazycunts.

[darchiefan]

@uche007us If you are a candidate you should be able to go on any media program (even ones that don't agree) and hold your own on your positions to get your message across. Rachel debates issues.....she's not looking to mock candidates on her show. She wants to see them with intelligence defend their issues and they can't because Rachel's good at finding why their views have a lot of holes in them. That's what puts them on the spot....they can't seem to defend their own issues.

[TyroneTasty]

@darchiefan Exactly, because it's not about intelligence anymore, it's about rhetoric and slamming it down the throats of prospective voters. It doesn't matter if you have nothing to say so long as you stick to the script. Oh, and you have to look good on TV.

[Stablemable2]

the Cons got served some punk-juice

[varran172]

When is this no ratings show going to b taken off the air?

[Monique90210]

Why so she can actually get ratings and not be fired? lol

[nt0xik8ed]

there's no conservative republican who would dare talk to anyone who has facts and reasoning on their side. just look at the crowd at any tea party rally, do you think those people know any better?

[775marc]

@nt0xik8ed I know, the tea party is a fucking joke.Im so glad these idiots dont hold rallies here in Reno, NV because if i have a legitimate disagreement with one person I would have to deal with a whole group of morons who don't have any facts to back up their argument.The outcome would probably break out in violence.I'm white and I agree with the media that these people are racist also.These republicans think they can run based on propaganda alone. They cant back up their views when questioned

[ace8842]

You came univited to stir up trouble. If I was O,Donnell I would have kicked Maddow out there, as she's not there for any good purpose.

[tishhead]

@ace8842 stir up trouble = ask serious non-fox news cheerleader questions. i realize that IS trouble for nitwits like o'donnell and angle.

[DHINTON7295]

"like to my face" L----O-----L!!!!

[Territomauvais]

Awesome. Shame they'll never do it. Even an interview with a relatively unbiased Network [in their eyes] like ABC or CBS is very, VERY rare. It was a disaster for Sarah Palin with Charles Gibson & Katie Couric lmao...

[Deioth]

@Territomauvais "Relatively"? LOL! Anything not Fox News is instantly Marxist liberal socialism in news form to these sheeple. And the ones in and seeking power know they can't afford to lose out on independents and moderates by proving their fearmongering and "us VS them" argument is all a coverup for how much fail and selfish greed they are. After Rand Paul's interview, Rachel is an off-limits show.

[uche007us]

O'Donnel is a crazy person, but why give an interview to program thats actively fighting for your defeat. You have to control the message. Why do i think TRMS would only talking about witch craft and nothing of substance? cos thats the sort of thing she does to tea party candidates, we all remember the interview with Rand paul

[adamsfall]

@uche007us I seriously doubt she would have asked her about witchcraft. The questions O'Donnell is hiding from have to do with her education and her spending of campaign funds.

[tishhead]

@uche007us you don't think a senate candidate who opposes the civil rights act is newsworthy? i guarantee you if a democrat opposed the civil rights act, he/she would also be aggressively questioned.

btw, i assume that means any democrat shouldn't appear on fox news.

[uche007us]

@tishhead he disagreed a provision in the civil rights act that would force a black man to serve a KKK member in his privately run business. And no, it did not worth the 10min Rachel spent on the issue because a civil right bill is not coming up 4 vote soon in congress (unless 75 libertarian senator were nominated).

With the way the media operates in this country am not going to begrudge a struggling candidates refusal to appear in MSNBC or FOX especially when most are still learning the ropes

[tishhead]

@uche007us he indicated that disagreeing with that provision would have been enough for him to vote against it. but when she pressed him, he repeatedly danced around a direct answer, which is the only reason that subject dragged on. a potential US senator suggesting he would have voted against the civil rights act is big news, even if it isn't convenient. it is certainly a valid pt for voters to consider.