AjnaKotobide is right actually... I hate to say it. The guy doing the examining is embarrassingly unknowledgeable. Really, it's actually embarrassing to anyone who knows something about electronics.
This important part about this video is nothing that is being said by this fellow but rather that we get to see the system.
Those things said the only thing more embarrassing then this man's explanations is the retardedness of the design of the machine itself.
Last 20 years of my life, I wasted fixing computers. This hardware is VERY unreliable. Difficult to rig, but unreliable. But if we can't see the source code for the software, there's no question about rigging the elections. PAPER is the only way!!! I wonder why don't these machines print 18 copies of each vote and send a copy to each political party for an optional recount? Or make voting completely transparent and online available?
New Hampshire primary 2008 and 2004 for dummies: Obama's role explained, or How can Hillary Clinton win with 5 pct of the votes?
For the 1000th time: EVERYTHING has been explained long ago!
The magic: voting machines + the candidate who is supposed to lose.
Reminder: Obama and Ron Paul role is to confirm that illuminati media polls are legit and voting machines count Clinton's votes correctly, no matter what
Ignore Ajna again. Unless he thinks the scanner isn't a scanner, what was the tech wrong about?
Just an ordinary B/W scanner. There really much of a need to remove/examine it other than to confirm that it really is a scanner andthat it actually does something.
The debate is about the machine itself. Would you consider these things secure for the elections of the United States, based on what you see in the microelectronics you are so willing to debate?
I bet money on those machines McCain will win in November...
watch and see!
Clue: Ohio, Indiana, MI, Fla and NH!
dragonhost777 3 years ago
Looks good to me. Stick glue in the modem port and call it secure.
While you had your hands on this, why didn't you clone the firmware with an eprom reader?
Any chipset information along with formaware would be useful in seeing what "remote access" capability this device had.
BTW, this looks archaic. But so were the punchcards that warked for so long.
caseyrose415 4 years ago
breakdown, go ahead give it to me
mcalien24 4 years ago
AjnaKotobide is right actually... I hate to say it. The guy doing the examining is embarrassingly unknowledgeable. Really, it's actually embarrassing to anyone who knows something about electronics.
This important part about this video is nothing that is being said by this fellow but rather that we get to see the system.
Those things said the only thing more embarrassing then this man's explanations is the retardedness of the design of the machine itself.
Tesselator 4 years ago
Last 20 years of my life, I wasted fixing computers. This hardware is VERY unreliable. Difficult to rig, but unreliable. But if we can't see the source code for the software, there's no question about rigging the elections. PAPER is the only way!!! I wonder why don't these machines print 18 copies of each vote and send a copy to each political party for an optional recount? Or make voting completely transparent and online available?
And vote Ron Paul.
bugogorac 4 years ago 5
when was this video taken - the tape produced reads 2005
kelleygracie 4 years ago
New Hampshire primary 2008 and 2004 for dummies: Obama's role explained, or How can Hillary Clinton win with 5 pct of the votes?
For the 1000th time: EVERYTHING has been explained long ago!
The magic: voting machines + the candidate who is supposed to lose.
Reminder: Obama and Ron Paul role is to confirm that illuminati media polls are legit and voting machines count Clinton's votes correctly, no matter what
Google:
MattMarriott end-times-computers
Truth666 4 years ago
truth666 (why the 666?)
Obama is a CFR member - RP is not.
NanetteW 4 years ago 5
As are hillary, mc cain, romney, huck guli..
aw what the huck the list is on my page-
Ron Paul is THE ONLY NON CFR CANDIDATE-
God Bless America
dfwtexxas 4 years ago
dont trust it
splendidyouth 4 years ago
Ignore Ajna again. Unless he thinks the scanner isn't a scanner, what was the tech wrong about?
Just an ordinary B/W scanner. There really much of a need to remove/examine it other than to confirm that it really is a scanner andthat it actually does something.
BI30 4 years ago
The debate is about the machine itself. Would you consider these things secure for the elections of the United States, based on what you see in the microelectronics you are so willing to debate?
BlackBoxVoting 4 years ago
This guy is a moron. Happy to debate that with any microelectronics expert.
AjnaKotobide 4 years ago