Image stabilizer test 3/3 using a Panasonic LUMIX camera.

[gusoooooo]

¡What a cheap test!, just by pure coincidence the picture without stabilizer is taken right in the middle of the travel when it goes the fastest (from left to right). The one with the stabilizer on is taken in the extreme left position when the butterfly is completely stop.

Very fair comparison. I have a lumix fs3, and I can't barely distinguisgh "is" on or "is" off.

[mbiber123]

Why did they choose that horrible voice?!?!

[erichau728]

My ears are going to bleed x_x, great review tho

[CarolJWright]

She is probably an English speaking gal whose first language is Japanese. Very precise -- over precise -- enunciation. And they didn't use background music to soften the effect. Was glad to see this demo, as I'd assumed there was some mechanism in the lens that compensated for reducing blur, and assume that in very low light there would be a limit of what one could capture. Of course, the 1250 ISO would give a less precise photo quality.

[CarolJWright]

oh, there is another test for the lens image stabilizer...with cameras on a vibration board. Same narrator. They really need to add some simple music, with vol rising and falling. The absolute dead sound between sentences is another factor here. Sound robotic.

[MrsBrit1]

interesting video, but the voice over is crazy!! lol

[macbmacb]

good video