aaportal.net - The largest International community&News feed of ArcheAge - a promising Next-Gen MMO based on CryEngine 2. Join us now and read exclusive articles about the next hit in MMO genre!
are you completely retarded? Consoles simply cant cope with Cryengine 2. Cryengine 3 was made just so consoles noobs can say "yerr we can run crysis" cos they cried for 2 years
But Crysis could have been SO MUCH better if Crytek would have make full use of the physics and if the player would see more animations of prophet, e.g. in 1:57 - it almost look like a COD4 experience.
Crytek should work on the destructivity of the environments, it's cool and all at first but all the destruction is basically the same. the trees break in the same way, just at different points. wood fences break into planned pieces after a few shots. And metal bends to a specific point and thats it. They should try to randomize the way objects break or bend, because it's nothing too great, but still is kinda cool.
If you buy Crysis or Crysis Warhead, and aren't planning to make profit. Or, you could contact Crytek(search on Google) on how you would go about licensing it.
Call me crazy but didn't Crytek do the EXACT SAME THING as Bethesada Softworks when they showed the tech demos for Oblivion? Then once they were released the graphics were, "Merely above" the compition. I'll admit, crysis looks better than A LOT of other games, but not a huge jump they they made it out to be.
Okay, you're crazy. Crysis was truly next-gen in many ways. Compare Crysis to DOOM 3. That's the proper measure. Big leap forward.
Bethesda's Bioshock is also next-gen, and amazing, too. But the implementations of Unreal Engine 3 (used in Bioshock) I've seen so far do not match the impact of Crytek.
All you have to do is see the outdoor levels and alien cave levels in Crysis. Easily tops anything else out there.
Thing one: I agree with you completely, its an amazing leap in technology. I just wish they didn't make it out to be as good as it looked in the Tech Demos then turn around an tone it down loads. (Look at comparison shots from original to now)
Thing two: I was merely stating that they (they being both Bethesda with Oblivion and Crytek with Crysis) made it look like a leap from DOS game to 3D. Then just made doom. A good leap, but not as adverti
Hehe. But even 4 months out nobody's published anything better.
What's funny about the promos is they are compressed video, which tends to change the experience. I don't think they're being dishonest so much as its impossible to reproduce. Plus long anticipation makes it hard to gauge expectations.
But I think the real game is damn close to what the videos showed. I feel many scenes matched the promo videos I saw to a high degree.
Err, apparently you've never played mirrors edge. Its a game that's surpassed Crysis graphically speaking. (Plus it has PhysX =D)
Don't get me wrong, I love Crysis, but you're not understanding what I'm saying. What they portrayed in the demos are NOT the same experience in the actual game.
Mirror's Edge looking better than Crysis? Are you crazy!? Crysis generates dynamic lighting, soft shadows all in real time and displays incredible textures and models of thousands of foliage with an impressive physics engine. What do you get on Mirror's Edge? Building tops with cubic shapes all over. Now tell me which one is better...
Who cares about PhysX? Cryengine already has it's own physics engine which is very well done.
I've played both Mirror's Edge and Crysis, dumbass, and I don't even see how you can compare them. Fanboy lol? Crysis fried my brand new GFX card in a few hours on Very High, max resolution... If anything, I'm pissed at this game, but I was stunned at it's beauty when I played it. You just can't compare the amount of complexity in Crysis to that of ME.
You sir, are the greatest fanboy i've ever seen. To say that Mirror's Edge looks better than Crysis, you must be or the biggest fanboy on Earth or a fool.
Mirror's edge is not even near of being the best looking CONSOLE game. While Crysis is the best looking game on a PC by far, which easily surpasses anything on a console.
First off, don't just throw in bullshit numbers like that without a link. Second, even if that was true, that's pretty much where the comparison stops. ME is nowhere near what Crysis accomplished in terms of graphics. Like I said, you can't compare the rendering of a few cubic shapes to that of thousands of trees, grass, plants, etc. with complex shadows and light filtering.
um, funny you'd base that on texture resolution. You ARE the biggest fanboy, ever. I mean, there are WAY more factors then tex. revolution. there is crysis' f.c. ambient occlusion, the realtime shadows really beat any of UT3E's btw. Then the shader quality. I'm serious, you have got to be at least a little bit retarded. I mean, the Id tech 4 has a process called supertexturing or something and has max 3000something by 3000something, and it's graphics aren't good these days.
omg you are SOOO ignorant!!! physx DONT have breakable tree. physx JUST add breakable glass and cloth...WOW (i love physx lol) but honestly...you cant be serious
i know you posted this for past 2 month but i CANT believe someone said that...
EASELY the most IGNORANT guy i have EVER see...i cant stop laughing
ur right, crysis doesnt make use of ageia physics but the braking tree is part of cryteks own physics system. which is very complex. i do hope crysis 2 makes use of the agiea physics though, it would be awesome
It's pretty funny because eveyr year we are all 'omg!' and then the 'omg' turns into 'omg lame' and 10 years is 32x more hardware by Moore's Law... And games scale rapidly to fill up hardware, so Crysis will look like shit in 10 years, it'll be running on cell phones or something.
Wtf is this shit?! I saw this video year ago. All these things are in the crysis 1. This same video was showing all the same things what will be in crysis 1.
well most people like unreal better mainly becuase its been easiser to develop for for a while now. personally i just love gears and this game is pretty mediocre in my opinion. im just watching it for the nuke 0.o
The only reason people like the Unreal Engine better is because the 360 and ps3 can run Unreal graphx and cant handel graphx plus not many computers out thier can handle The Cryengine while most could handel the Unreal.
And that's a good enough reason for me. A game that runs like shit, is in my opinion, shit. Plus Unreal Engine 3 has all of the listed features except 1, 7 and 14, which can all be implemented quite easily and still run on a 3-year-old computer reasonably well.
also the tank clipped a big peice of the building that is just one of the reasons that this game is not comeing out yet and they are waiting for the direct x 10 graphics enabled cards to get cheaper for a larger audience at launch
im gonna clear up the confusion dx9 is suported but will not look as good as what u saw and also the 360 and ps3 could both handle this in a downscaled version with lots of behind the scenes and backdoor tricks (like where the graphcis are not all there until you get close) and many other tricks
hey mechanicgodcreator, the mark of a good game is low system requirements. I'm expecting that "all" you'll need is a Direct X10 compatible graphics card and windows vista.
This engine needs Directx10 to run, which XBOX360 and PS3 hardware DOESNT SUPPORT! Console owners shouldnt even dream about it. It will most probably be used in te next generation XBOX, which will come out in 2 years
xbox 360 can also "handle" that. wii could become difficult :-P Remember FarCry! for full detail and everything you need a pc with over 3 GHz Processor and 1 GB RAM, but they brought the game to XBOX 1! with very impressing graphics and an xbox 1 has 64 mb ram I think so if they say you'll need a PC with 4 GB RAM for crysis they can make it for 360 easily, cause it has 512 mb --FAST DDR3--, working as good as 2 GB in a PC.
This game brings my PC "down to it's knees".
tazss159 10 months ago
1:51 that motion blur. Gotta love it.
bigtnaples 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
aaportal.net - The largest International community&News feed of ArcheAge - a promising Next-Gen MMO based on CryEngine 2. Join us now and read exclusive articles about the next hit in MMO genre!
RomtimBS 11 months ago
i don't get those graphics in crysis ? ;(
Del4Mar 1 year ago
This is just the original Crysis trailer. Cryengine 2 is what is being used to run Crysis 2 for the consoles.
Fyraxis 2 years ago
are you completely retarded? Consoles simply cant cope with Cryengine 2. Cryengine 3 was made just so consoles noobs can say "yerr we can run crysis" cos they cried for 2 years
DaPony1736 2 years ago
Oh, my bad. Cryengine 3 was for consoles. No need to be a dick about it, internet tough guy.
Fyraxis 2 years ago 12
@DaPony1736 CE 3 was made for console only?
wtf Crysis 2 uses the CE 3 and will be aviable for PC
MrAlucard990 1 year ago
Nice
ShawnAmaro 2 years ago
How can you get cryengine 2?
sniperscope20 2 years ago
Umm... it sais available now...
Buzzlord 2 years ago
Some employee at crytek NEEDS TO LEAK THAT BUILD OF CRYSIS! It looks over 9000 times better than the final game.
CrdBrdProjects 2 years ago
yeah, but Crysis 2 is gonna be over 9000 times better than that i think :]
Tobiasz931 2 years ago
dude its all pre rendered
they are all normal crysis graphics but at a constant frame rate =]
dubmywub 2 years ago
Nope, its not :-P
But Crysis could have been SO MUCH better if Crytek would have make full use of the physics and if the player would see more animations of prophet, e.g. in 1:57 - it almost look like a COD4 experience.
LockheedC130 2 years ago
no computer would be able to run it
lol you'd need like 10 GTX 295s
redslownight 2 years ago
Crytek should work on the destructivity of the environments, it's cool and all at first but all the destruction is basically the same. the trees break in the same way, just at different points. wood fences break into planned pieces after a few shots. And metal bends to a specific point and thats it. They should try to randomize the way objects break or bend, because it's nothing too great, but still is kinda cool.
swnzpd 2 years ago
Crytek are living far into the future. Shame that you need a supercomputer to harness the full potential today.
god0fgod 2 years ago
can you get this program? if so at what cost?
A7x256 2 years ago
If you buy Crysis or Crysis Warhead, and aren't planning to make profit. Or, you could contact Crytek(search on Google) on how you would go about licensing it.
DirtJuice 2 years ago
crysis must have realistic suppesion psyhics in carrs
BRIANxdrift 2 years ago
What is suppesion psyhics? I really don't know :p
Samuelgames 2 years ago
suppesion in cars is not realistic , crytek must repair this and make real suppesion , sterring , damage in cars :P
BRIANxdrift 2 years ago
Crysis has everything =)
GunskiMod 2 years ago
i don't think you can compare crysis with mirrors edge cause crysis is all junge an d beach an mirros edge is urban so pretty different.
all though i like crysis more cause mirrors edge is boring and crysis got more detailn in it
srry bout my bad english
allstrak 2 years ago
what is the best system that can operate this lag-free?
Cyloid 3 years ago
mine
serialkiller8 3 years ago
the commandore 64 afcourse
GTAfreAk112 3 years ago
yea, im using that one right now, the graphics look amazing!
tikvaboi 3 years ago
Your looking at probably buying a 5 grand computer to play this Very high graphics Lag free, and good frame rate..
tikvaboi 3 years ago
lmao, so not true...
forgottenbow 3 years ago
tivaboi, I have an $800 PC and have had it for 4 years. I bought a $300 graphics card and can play it on "HP Ultra High GFX" With 20-30 FPS.
rayfan9876 3 years ago
whoa, whered u get a $800 Pc that can play crysis?
tikvaboi 3 years ago
Plus $300 so like $1100. :P
rayfan9876 3 years ago
ahkk lol, why plus 300$?
tikvaboi 3 years ago
For the 9800GTX+.
rayfan9876 3 years ago
well now THATS a different story!
that can DEFIENETLY play it on ultra high
tikvaboi 3 years ago 2
Yah.
rayfan9876 3 years ago
my $500 comp can play crysis on all very high/ enthusiast mode and it's going at about 34fps, soo yeah. But mine is much newer so idk.
swnzpd 2 years ago
Really? What are the specys?
rayfan9876 2 years ago
2.8 dual core
2 GB DDR3
Fatal1ty 1X 8500
mmmmm. that's all i can remember whats on it now.
swnzpd 2 years ago
Comment removed
ResidentJeff 2 years ago
That's A LOT OF FPS for an 8800GT. :P Are you sure it was very high? And what level? I usually refer to the first level.
rayfan9876 2 years ago
Opps sorry......I thought I said at all 'High' settings :S . I get around 30-40 fps at 1024 x 768 resolution at all 'High' settings in Windows XP.
ResidentJeff 2 years ago
That's a little more like it. ;)
rayfan9876 2 years ago
ahh, the hightest 1080x something else so yeah.
swnzpd 2 years ago
No it doesn't allow ME to do anything, stupid!
Won't run on Linux..
Plus it prolly costs like A LOT to license..
cyborgtroy 3 years ago
i wish duke nukem forever ran on cryengine2
helldude90 3 years ago
rofl... absolutely right!
elcosomarcos 3 years ago
i dont wish that. Cryengine 2 will be totally outdated as soon as DNF is finished.
JazTony 3 years ago
Call me crazy but didn't Crytek do the EXACT SAME THING as Bethesada Softworks when they showed the tech demos for Oblivion? Then once they were released the graphics were, "Merely above" the compition. I'll admit, crysis looks better than A LOT of other games, but not a huge jump they they made it out to be.
forgottenbow 3 years ago
forgottenbow,
Okay, you're crazy. Crysis was truly next-gen in many ways. Compare Crysis to DOOM 3. That's the proper measure. Big leap forward.
Bethesda's Bioshock is also next-gen, and amazing, too. But the implementations of Unreal Engine 3 (used in Bioshock) I've seen so far do not match the impact of Crytek.
All you have to do is see the outdoor levels and alien cave levels in Crysis. Easily tops anything else out there.
averroes1138 3 years ago
Mate, I posted that like 4 months ago... lol.
Thing one: I agree with you completely, its an amazing leap in technology. I just wish they didn't make it out to be as good as it looked in the Tech Demos then turn around an tone it down loads. (Look at comparison shots from original to now)
Thing two: I was merely stating that they (they being both Bethesda with Oblivion and Crytek with Crysis) made it look like a leap from DOS game to 3D. Then just made doom. A good leap, but not as adverti
forgottenbow 3 years ago
Hehe. But even 4 months out nobody's published anything better.
What's funny about the promos is they are compressed video, which tends to change the experience. I don't think they're being dishonest so much as its impossible to reproduce. Plus long anticipation makes it hard to gauge expectations.
But I think the real game is damn close to what the videos showed. I feel many scenes matched the promo videos I saw to a high degree.
averroes1138 3 years ago
Err, apparently you've never played mirrors edge. Its a game that's surpassed Crysis graphically speaking. (Plus it has PhysX =D)
Don't get me wrong, I love Crysis, but you're not understanding what I'm saying. What they portrayed in the demos are NOT the same experience in the actual game.
forgottenbow 3 years ago
Excuse but i think you are high on crack or something.... Did you say Mirror's Edge looks better than Crysis????
DOOM2601 3 years ago
Lmao...yes I did. And it plays better... I love Crysis but facts are facts. I'm not trying to knock crysis but mirrors edge is newer technology
forgottenbow 3 years ago
Well, Mirror's Edge is based on Unreal Engine 3, so the technology is older, also, you need to be blind to say it looks better than Crysis.
DOOM2601 3 years ago
... if you payed attention to any of the blogs you'd know they totally revamped it.
And you need to be a fanboy if you don't see it.
forgottenbow 3 years ago
Wow wow wow wow... what??
Mirror's Edge looking better than Crysis? Are you crazy!? Crysis generates dynamic lighting, soft shadows all in real time and displays incredible textures and models of thousands of foliage with an impressive physics engine. What do you get on Mirror's Edge? Building tops with cubic shapes all over. Now tell me which one is better...
Angra1991 3 years ago
Err, if you over-expand one topic while not saying anything of the other then compare the two you're going to get an obvious choice... Debate fail.
Secondly, Crysis DOES NOT support PhysX from Nvidia. M.E. does... The textures on Mirrors Edge are higher resolutions than Crysis.
Third: the Shadows are much more dynamic in M.E. than Crysis.
If you're gonna debate between two games, play them both.
Stupid fanboy fail.
forgottenbow 3 years ago
Who cares about PhysX? Cryengine already has it's own physics engine which is very well done.
I've played both Mirror's Edge and Crysis, dumbass, and I don't even see how you can compare them. Fanboy lol? Crysis fried my brand new GFX card in a few hours on Very High, max resolution... If anything, I'm pissed at this game, but I was stunned at it's beauty when I played it. You just can't compare the amount of complexity in Crysis to that of ME.
Angra1991 3 years ago
Cool, I posted a full comparison with screenshots but it just disappeared... Awesome.
Angra1991 3 years ago
Calm down. This guy must be an idiot to say Mirror's Edge looks better than Crysis. There's no point in discussing that with a blind
DOOM2601 3 years ago
you need to put your glasses pal. Crysis is the best looking game to date. Nothing comes near it. you can ask anybody if you want.
DOOM2601 3 years ago
That's funny, due well to fact I lack corrective lenses. Secondly, the texture resolutions on Crysis are 768x768 at MAX.
Minimum on ME is 512x512 and at max are 1560x1560 (odd rez, I know). Stop being fanboys and admit it.
Jesus F'in Christ...
forgottenbow 3 years ago
You sir, are the greatest fanboy i've ever seen. To say that Mirror's Edge looks better than Crysis, you must be or the biggest fanboy on Earth or a fool.
Mirror's edge is not even near of being the best looking CONSOLE game. While Crysis is the best looking game on a PC by far, which easily surpasses anything on a console.
DOOM2601 2 years ago
First off, don't just throw in bullshit numbers like that without a link. Second, even if that was true, that's pretty much where the comparison stops. ME is nowhere near what Crysis accomplished in terms of graphics. Like I said, you can't compare the rendering of a few cubic shapes to that of thousands of trees, grass, plants, etc. with complex shadows and light filtering.
And btw, Jesus fucking Christ is masturbation.
Angra1991 2 years ago
um, funny you'd base that on texture resolution. You ARE the biggest fanboy, ever. I mean, there are WAY more factors then tex. revolution. there is crysis' f.c. ambient occlusion, the realtime shadows really beat any of UT3E's btw. Then the shader quality. I'm serious, you have got to be at least a little bit retarded. I mean, the Id tech 4 has a process called supertexturing or something and has max 3000something by 3000something, and it's graphics aren't good these days.
rolln2013 2 years ago
forgottenbow, dont talk when you dont know what you are talking about
mat967 2 years ago
aww come on man , mirror's edge is nice and all but when compared to crysis , crysis has to have a lot more detail , ugh....
shomval 2 years ago
omg you are SOOO ignorant!!! physx DONT have breakable tree. physx JUST add breakable glass and cloth...WOW (i love physx lol) but honestly...you cant be serious
i know you posted this for past 2 month but i CANT believe someone said that...
EASELY the most IGNORANT guy i have EVER see...i cant stop laughing
mat967 2 years ago
ur right, crysis doesnt make use of ageia physics but the braking tree is part of cryteks own physics system. which is very complex. i do hope crysis 2 makes use of the agiea physics though, it would be awesome
I9kieran94 2 years ago
like crysis
alleggheads 3 years ago
Actually this looks very good. And the physics is good aswell...
free4meh 3 years ago
omfg...but,after...some years (like 10 years) how will be CryENGINE 2 then??i mean,will it look crappy or not...
xCyberxCrusaderx 3 years ago
lol in ten years it will be obsolete
hubhub27 3 years ago
It's pretty funny because eveyr year we are all 'omg!' and then the 'omg' turns into 'omg lame' and 10 years is 32x more hardware by Moore's Law... And games scale rapidly to fill up hardware, so Crysis will look like shit in 10 years, it'll be running on cell phones or something.
cyborgtroy 3 years ago 9
@cyborgtroy cell phones probably wont exist in 10 years, we will just all have telepathy, lol jk u r right
csswafford 10 months ago
watch the Unreal Engine 3.5 demo
it's just as great.
jelle2503 3 years ago
Wtf is this shit?! I saw this video year ago. All these things are in the crysis 1. This same video was showing all the same things what will be in crysis 1.
SuurSurround 3 years ago
dude, this cryengine 2, not crysis 2.........
SBranco1991 3 years ago 4
The engine is amazing! :]
too bad the game itself looks very juvenile.. i hope this engine is used in more games in the future. (i imagine that's the purpose of it? :)
diegofloor 3 years ago
Cry engine is fucking great then unreal engine but both are cool
q8sauod 4 years ago
well most people like unreal better mainly becuase its been easiser to develop for for a while now. personally i just love gears and this game is pretty mediocre in my opinion. im just watching it for the nuke 0.o
ricochet36 4 years ago
meh, crysis is gears for the pc. it got pc of the year. altho the sandbox is limited, it came with sdk
rolln2013 3 years ago
The only reason people like the Unreal Engine better is because the 360 and ps3 can run Unreal graphx and cant handel graphx plus not many computers out thier can handle The Cryengine while most could handel the Unreal.
XaleTorren 3 years ago
And that's a good enough reason for me. A game that runs like shit, is in my opinion, shit. Plus Unreal Engine 3 has all of the listed features except 1, 7 and 14, which can all be implemented quite easily and still run on a 3-year-old computer reasonably well.
tiggxtreme 3 years ago
where do i get this?
please reply
Kris0990 4 years ago
i predict there would be physics in the oceans too, instead of wave animations..
Cryteck said: Crysis 2 will have "photorealistyc" graphics
in my point of view, that means when your mother enters your room, she will ask, what is that movie your watching? no mom, this is a game.
thats bealtiful
Perruci11 4 years ago
That nuclear explosion looks FUCKING AMAZING.. Can't wait for more games using this engine.
XavierVelez 4 years ago
oh fuck thats amazing
pcgamerdude53 4 years ago 3
Unreal Engine 3 is more rough
cryengine 2 is more smooth
but both are balanced and are both good
sponny1 4 years ago
i think both new engines rock u3 an cryengine2
br000ly 4 years ago
UEngine 3 is quite beatiful, but thats ONLY eye candy.
cryengine 2 is absolutly a masterpiece, every single new flawless effect in this game, is like a HUGE BLACK COCK IN UNREAL TORNAMENT 3 ASS.
lol.
though i really like both games, dont need to start a fight in here, wherever :P
GdFromHell 4 years ago 6
HUUUUGE.
lol
fabian2006 4 years ago
what happens if u cut down the whole forest
goldtapfinger 4 years ago 3
ein haus geht kapput aber man selber kann ganz locker weiter laufen
2:51
spicky1986 4 years ago
1) Try talking ENGLISH on international sites like this
2) It's because of his suit in crysis that he manages to keep standing while shit blows up
Ziekheid 4 years ago
international sites ok.. but why ? why english?.. what makes it speacial
okan313131 4 years ago
Have you been living under a rock, sir :/ ?
TheAlmightyRoyzo 4 years ago
What else do you suggest, spanish or chinese?
Ziekheid 4 years ago
English is speacil coz you lost the war :P
UrbanZenpk 4 years ago
english is special because the internet is in english...or 99.99% of it you dumbass, god damn hippie
gaby161290 4 years ago
a house goes to cape PUT however one can completely loosely far run 2:51
AntiHatorade 3 years ago
a house goes to cape PUT however one can completely loosely far run 2:51
AntiHatorade 3 years ago
2) Es ist wegen seiner Klage im crysis, das er erreicht, zu halten zu stehen, während Scheiße explodiert
AntiHatorade 3 years ago
ja was denn is doch soo
spicky1986 3 years ago
What? ahahhahahah, I SMELL IGNORANCE!
KohrsAKT 4 years ago 3
yeah probably
lol
malahci 4 years ago 2
I've just emerged from an 18 year coma and WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Will this run on my Amiga CD32?
UFOIST 4 years ago 3
HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAAHHAAH
Reaperss 4 years ago
holy crap my mouth dropped when i saw the physics system demo
PokeMePT 4 years ago 5
omfg my jaw!
BazzTheBoss 4 years ago 5
wow.. the next gen-physics system looks ammazing...!
BOOOOOOOOOOM!!
DeathAwaitsYouAll 4 years ago 2
also the tank clipped a big peice of the building that is just one of the reasons that this game is not comeing out yet and they are waiting for the direct x 10 graphics enabled cards to get cheaper for a larger audience at launch
im0a0utuber 4 years ago
im gonna clear up the confusion dx9 is suported but will not look as good as what u saw and also the 360 and ps3 could both handle this in a downscaled version with lots of behind the scenes and backdoor tricks (like where the graphcis are not all there until you get close) and many other tricks
im0a0utuber 4 years ago
they really need to work on the nuke, i mean the area of total destruction is very close to the huge fireball.
Nuker1337 4 years ago
hey mechanicgodcreator, the mark of a good game is low system requirements. I'm expecting that "all" you'll need is a Direct X10 compatible graphics card and windows vista.
WRMM
WarRockMovieMaker 4 years ago
Look at that Nuke!
iamcaelum 4 years ago
Awesomeness.
WRMM
WarRockMovieMaker 4 years ago
:O *claps*
cdsand 4 years ago
I loved the Nuke at the end of the vid.!!
Jagguar20 4 years ago
probably the best game engine ever created...
FragZone 4 years ago
not really, just the one with the most realistic graphics. It'll be a nice game tho.
ErskaConti 4 years ago
WOW!
fogaoagas 4 years ago
wow great engine i dont want to see the system requirements they must be insane
mechanicgodcreator 4 years ago
This engine needs Directx10 to run, which XBOX360 and PS3 hardware DOESNT SUPPORT! Console owners shouldnt even dream about it. It will most probably be used in te next generation XBOX, which will come out in 2 years
tepkisiz 4 years ago
CryEngine 2 runs on DX9 too
alextgordon 4 years ago
Many could use this for pyhsics demonstrations
others would se it as an imitaion of life or a work of art
I see this as AWESOME!!!
CodenameLegacy 4 years ago
xbox 360 can also "handle" that. wii could become difficult :-P Remember FarCry! for full detail and everything you need a pc with over 3 GHz Processor and 1 GB RAM, but they brought the game to XBOX 1! with very impressing graphics and an xbox 1 has 64 mb ram I think so if they say you'll need a PC with 4 GB RAM for crysis they can make it for 360 easily, cause it has 512 mb --FAST DDR3--, working as good as 2 GB in a PC.
BallerSamurai 4 years ago
OMG OMG!!
manueex 4 years ago
I heard the game big rigs 2 is so gonna kick crysis's ass!
Conspiracy7heory 4 years ago
did you see that shockwave at the end?! omg that looks sweet!
Synd01 4 years ago
ORGY
beanstudd 4 years ago
O.O beautiful, someone please by me a pc! my pc has trouble running half life 1 :(
hylianknight3 4 years ago
Haha.
vicariouspunishment 4 years ago
AWESOME
uraniumcyrus 4 years ago
this is cool but i dont have many 2 buy a video card..2 have this kind of graphics|| :p
crashsoul 4 years ago
thanks to germany for this! i love crytek! please port it to the ps3!
melkormorgoth1337 4 years ago
HAHA Ps3 u dream, they already said its for PC, ps3 or Xbox cant handle that, well maybe ps3 in the future
burnoutnt 4 years ago
Can someone buy me an alienware?
PomPaFriCK 4 years ago
Oh my God...
Irzibeq 4 years ago
No, CryEngine2 is the BEST. xDD
FXDani 4 years ago
After that i had sex with farcry :P
CryEngine is AWESOMEEEEEEEE
giresunboy 4 years ago
me too lol xD
feenux09 4 years ago
I had an orgasm
omfgstfuandgtfo 4 years ago 3