Finally, while the latter is stunning example of excess federal power run amok, this witness, who didn't have so much as a traffic ticket, made an astonishing statement that caught my attention. He talked about having left the U.S. out of fear for 6 months at a time in the couple of years since his cooerced testimony and his run-ins with the federal menace at the border, ETC...to live with his friend IN CHINA! Here's a U.S. CITIZEN (SLAVE) who has concluded that CHINA is safer than the U.S.!
The hour-long tape of that conversation includes the cooercive techniques of feds that forced his false testimony; it includes his story about his own unfortunate dealings with the police state presence at the canadian border, where he was taken out of his firend's car at gun point, put on the ground and cuffed and taken in for questioning that resulted in him breaking down, all over a CIVIL "no stalking order" (NO criminal record), he describes how they swiped his ID and went into battle mode.
There's been a new development in this case, involving testimony given by a prosecution witness for the US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, who has recanted his testimony claiming he was cooerced and intimidated into testifying to a falsehood that he knew to be false. This development is at nh underground under the brown blog and it includes a link to an mp3 copy of a conversation that the witness had with Reilly's attorney. The witness contacted his lawyers after his "conscience" got the better of him.
@2:06 I'd like to qualify that statement Dave, by saying Ed & Elaine refused to pay their income tax until they were shown the law requiring it.. moreover, they were ready, willing and able to pay but wanted to see the law.. a lawyer here on YT did a video that says he can't find anywhere in the Income Tax code that shows where even lawyers have to pay income tax on their labor.. Income Taxes are the result of income generated via "Commerce",ie. buying&selling w/no value added..
there is truth to the straw man thing, but there is also truth to what you say Dave no one understands or acknowledges the straw man. The Capitol letters on your government papers basically represent the "you INC". that is unwillingly and unknownigly set up when you sign standard documents. This then serves to preceed the constitutional law with contractual law. At least as far as I have managed to understand it.
I think it comes from the commerce clause, though I could be mistaken.
It is absolutely true. this is not the what they teach you in schools nor will it ever appear on the news. The whole corrupt system works because not enough of us is aware of what riley and the Brown's are aware of.
The Judge was an asshole. The Fed is against the Constitution, hence the court is illegal. Screw the FED. The law of Land and Sea. Corporations are run by the Law of the Sea and we are subjigated by it. I do find Riley's argument completely legitimate. There is no complication here, only the criminality of the so called Justice system!
If you are going to step into their courts and enter your 'person' into their jurisdiction then it doesn't matter if it is in ALL-CAPITALS or not as you entered that legal-fiction into their jurisdiction and granted them powers over it by your voluntary "under-standing" of them.
From the beginning you need to establish your status as a sovereign and free man/woman, and maintain separation from the vehicle that is your 'person' (Artificial or Natural), and then deny them consent as a free man.
20. If you MUST have a Social Security Number, you should start an artificial business name that is your full name in all capital letters. Get a taxpayer identification number using an IRS form W-9 for the business entity that has your name and use that. If you are asked for a Socialist Security Number, provide the one for the business, rather then a personal one.
Regardless of Riley's bizarre legal arguments, he didn't harm anyone, unlike many of the Fedthugs. The point is this: Should a man who harmed no one be locked in a cage at all, let alone for 30+ years???
The US Legislative Democracy (DC and territories).
The USA Republic died when the south walked out (Sine-Die) prior to the Civil War and the US has ruled under marital law as signified by the gold fringe around the military flag used in court ever since. Mention the Constitution and the judge will hold you in contempt. You are an enemy combatant!
Very interesting report, Ridley. The courts on the land of continental America have been by de facto usurped by a different form of government. We the people are currently under Admiralty jurisdiction and have no access to common law. The system works on presumptions, guilty until proven innocent, similar to the inquisition of the Roman Catholic Church, the whore of Babylon.
The 'legal fiction' argument is only "complicated" if you're not particularly bright. It holds any water in court if you ask questions on the record. Sir, for and on the record, is that my full lawful name on your piece of paper. Are you operating under the presumption that I am that legal fiction?" Works for me just fine.
Apologies 4 the facetious tone of my post.I was not inferring *you* were 'not particularly bright'.I can see from yor blog that u're not IQ challenged.I get a little irked wen the subject of 'en legis PERSONS' is deemed esoteric or inaccessible in some way.The simple fact is th@ Riley was on the right track but he was answering questions & was testifying instead of asking the right questions.If it is a subject you would like to know more about,I would be happy to point u in the right direction.
Dave, I have to second TAT's use of the Freeman technologies. It's a shame you refuse to even have an open mind to this. Being a Video Journalist and all. And especially since you promote freedom. How can you be truly free if you refuse to even challenge their own words and then use them against them.
Google: Robert Menard ( who has had National Success in Canada & New Zealand) Winston Shrout who explains the use of Bonds secured by your Birth Certificate to Set Off Public Debt
Mary Elizabeth Croft and her free pdf file Book here on the internet.
These people have perfected the movement, have had tremendous success, and Freemen like TheAntiTerrorist or Sovereigns like myself appreciate their research.
I have tried in vain to comment about this before, but you censored me. Funny, my close friend in the Mask wasn't censored and all of a sudden you're honored...
You might want to Google: Shrout in Kelowna or thinkfree(dot)ca or winstonshroutsolutionsincommerce(dot)com
Maybe you might look up HJR 192 passed June 5th 1933. It is when they took substance out of our money, and the Government guaranteed payment of all public debt by the citizens. This doesn't just mean public streets or public works. It means you can't pay a debt with something of no value. So therefore by filing a 1099OID with (for instance) a Sears receipt and having their Tax ID #, you can get your FRNs back.
The next time you get a utility bill or even a Court order to Pay Bail for a traffic violation simply write diagonally on the Remittance Slip
Accepted for Value
Exempt from Levy per HJR 192 June 5th 1933
Autograph & Date
UCC 1-207 & 1-308
And it's paid....
Remittance = Is a form of money. It's money sent from one Merchant to another, either in Bill of Exchange, check, specie or otherwise. It's a piece of paper worth the amount claimed.
Next time you SUBMIT an APPLICATION for REGISTRATION think about what those words mean.
- Submit: To agree to another's will or to leave to another's discretion. Form of Surrender. ALWAYS voluntary. Implies lawful right to fight.
- Application: Means to 'beg, plead, petition, implore, entreat or request. Look at the assumptions those words create. He who begs knows exactly what they are begging for.
They are acknowledging the authority to grant or if it doesn't exist, they are willing to create it through transference. ALWAYS Voluntary
- Registration: To sign over for safe keeping. ALWAYS voluntary. Abandons complete ownership for partial.
- Must: Legally can be synonymous with 'may'. Has two senses: Imperative or a directive. One creates obligations, the other defines conditions. ALWAYS a directive when used with 'apply'.
DELIVERY - A voluntary transfer of title or possession from one party to another.
Mom "delivered" a biological entity into the hands of the State Official (The Doctor) who had a license and a bond, and based on that there was an Application of Live Birth filled out and a trust situation was setup - Foreign Situs Trust
That trust was funded by the "International" (Dept of Treasury) possibly the IMF
The next time you get a utility bill or even a Court order to Pay Bail for a traffic violation simply write diagonally on the Remittance Slip:
Accepted for Value
Exempt from Levy per HJR 192 June 5th 1933
Autograph & Date
UCC 1-207 & 1-308
Exemption ID # 123-45-6789 (SSN)
And it's paid....
Remittance = Is a form of money. It's money sent from one Merchant to another, either in Bill of Exchange, check, specie or otherwise. It's a piece of paper worth the amount claimed.
Hi AT. I agree with most of your comment except for the "Sir" part as of that moment in time you have no way to assertain the man you are speaking with is a knight of the realm. I would simply say. For and on the record etc. If you want to let him know you are speaking to him look at him and ask him who he is, does he have documented proof to display and enter into the record,that he has standing here today. If so then let him STAND(not sit) and display it, then allow him enter it.
In 1996 the gov charged a group of people in Montana with several crimes. They were known as the Freemen and espoused many of the things Riley seems to have used. All but two of the Freemen were found guilty and most were sentenced to lengthy prison sentences.
That's odd, I thought posted a reply to your question. There were two events involving news crews. One that happened outside the house in the yard, and the other with a different news crew from another network that happened on nearby road. The first news crew was ordered off the property. The second one had their camera taken.
PLease don't confuse the "Freemen" of 1966 with the Menard & Shrout movement. Since that time there has been 42 years of intensive de-construction of the Statutes, Codes, Acts etc, leading to many successes. One of the strongest new technologies is to have your Bond in place BEFORE dealing with the courts...
Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. - Albert Einstein.
The events involving the group known as the Freemen that I was referring to happened in 1996, not 1966. I'm not aware of the Menard & Shrout movement. And I wasn't condemning, just making an observation.
Since the courts are registered as Corporations for Profit on the stock market. They are subject to liens too. If you have an unlimited US Treasury Bond based on your Birth Certificate, you can basically "subrogate" the case. I'm painting in broad strokes. But it isn't THAT complicated. It is possible to liquidate the Judge's Bond, and the prosecution team's bond. Appoint your Defense counsel as your Fiduciary Debtor, now really watch him work for you.
Finally, while the latter is stunning example of excess federal power run amok, this witness, who didn't have so much as a traffic ticket, made an astonishing statement that caught my attention. He talked about having left the U.S. out of fear for 6 months at a time in the couple of years since his cooerced testimony and his run-ins with the federal menace at the border, ETC...to live with his friend IN CHINA! Here's a U.S. CITIZEN (SLAVE) who has concluded that CHINA is safer than the U.S.!
slewofdamascus 9 months ago
The hour-long tape of that conversation includes the cooercive techniques of feds that forced his false testimony; it includes his story about his own unfortunate dealings with the police state presence at the canadian border, where he was taken out of his firend's car at gun point, put on the ground and cuffed and taken in for questioning that resulted in him breaking down, all over a CIVIL "no stalking order" (NO criminal record), he describes how they swiped his ID and went into battle mode.
slewofdamascus 9 months ago
There's been a new development in this case, involving testimony given by a prosecution witness for the US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, who has recanted his testimony claiming he was cooerced and intimidated into testifying to a falsehood that he knew to be false. This development is at nh underground under the brown blog and it includes a link to an mp3 copy of a conversation that the witness had with Reilly's attorney. The witness contacted his lawyers after his "conscience" got the better of him.
slewofdamascus 9 months ago
@2:06 I'd like to qualify that statement Dave, by saying Ed & Elaine refused to pay their income tax until they were shown the law requiring it.. moreover, they were ready, willing and able to pay but wanted to see the law.. a lawyer here on YT did a video that says he can't find anywhere in the Income Tax code that shows where even lawyers have to pay income tax on their labor.. Income Taxes are the result of income generated via "Commerce",ie. buying&selling w/no value added..
Dewdaahman 2 years ago
there is truth to the straw man thing, but there is also truth to what you say Dave no one understands or acknowledges the straw man. The Capitol letters on your government papers basically represent the "you INC". that is unwillingly and unknownigly set up when you sign standard documents. This then serves to preceed the constitutional law with contractual law. At least as far as I have managed to understand it.
I think it comes from the commerce clause, though I could be mistaken.
jwsoup 2 years ago
It is absolutely true. this is not the what they teach you in schools nor will it ever appear on the news. The whole corrupt system works because not enough of us is aware of what riley and the Brown's are aware of.
decy22 2 years ago
The Judge was an asshole. The Fed is against the Constitution, hence the court is illegal. Screw the FED. The law of Land and Sea. Corporations are run by the Law of the Sea and we are subjigated by it. I do find Riley's argument completely legitimate. There is no complication here, only the criminality of the so called Justice system!
SiriosIX 2 years ago
You can murder and get 1/6th of that time in prison. Fascist, USA <---Welcome.
Rikiru 3 years ago 2
If you are going to step into their courts and enter your 'person' into their jurisdiction then it doesn't matter if it is in ALL-CAPITALS or not as you entered that legal-fiction into their jurisdiction and granted them powers over it by your voluntary "under-standing" of them.
From the beginning you need to establish your status as a sovereign and free man/woman, and maintain separation from the vehicle that is your 'person' (Artificial or Natural), and then deny them consent as a free man.
kuriokazuki 3 years ago
regarding the name in all capital letters, perhaps this is what Danny Reilly was referring to:
from a website describing how to become a sovereign individual (famguardian [dot] org/TaxFreedom/Instructions/0.10BecomingSovereign.htm):
amagilly 3 years ago
20. If you MUST have a Social Security Number, you should start an artificial business name that is your full name in all capital letters. Get a taxpayer identification number using an IRS form W-9 for the business entity that has your name and use that. If you are asked for a Socialist Security Number, provide the one for the business, rather then a personal one.
amagilly 3 years ago
Regardless of Riley's bizarre legal arguments, he didn't harm anyone, unlike many of the Fedthugs. The point is this: Should a man who harmed no one be locked in a cage at all, let alone for 30+ years???
bigdstocktrader 3 years ago
What a damn ripoff. US citizens everywhere should be outraged by this.
bigdstocktrader 3 years ago
There were originally 2 federal jurisdictions.
The USA Constitutional Republic (the States)
AND
The US Legislative Democracy (DC and territories).
The USA Republic died when the south walked out (Sine-Die) prior to the Civil War and the US has ruled under marital law as signified by the gold fringe around the military flag used in court ever since. Mention the Constitution and the judge will hold you in contempt. You are an enemy combatant!
I've seen it happen time and again.
yakyakyak69 3 years ago
Very interesting report, Ridley. The courts on the land of continental America have been by de facto usurped by a different form of government. We the people are currently under Admiralty jurisdiction and have no access to common law. The system works on presumptions, guilty until proven innocent, similar to the inquisition of the Roman Catholic Church, the whore of Babylon.
ornelas3830 3 years ago
He dared to say No to the feds. Lucky to still be alive.
CurtHowland 3 years ago
The 'legal fiction' argument is only "complicated" if you're not particularly bright. It holds any water in court if you ask questions on the record. Sir, for and on the record, is that my full lawful name on your piece of paper. Are you operating under the presumption that I am that legal fiction?" Works for me just fine.
TheAntiTerrorist 3 years ago
well maybe i am not particularly bright then but i *am* honored to get my first visit from TAT himself!
RidleyReport 3 years ago
Apologies 4 the facetious tone of my post.I was not inferring *you* were 'not particularly bright'.I can see from yor blog that u're not IQ challenged.I get a little irked wen the subject of 'en legis PERSONS' is deemed esoteric or inaccessible in some way.The simple fact is th@ Riley was on the right track but he was answering questions & was testifying instead of asking the right questions.If it is a subject you would like to know more about,I would be happy to point u in the right direction.
TheAntiTerrorist 3 years ago
Excuse my attempt to beat the character count by using phone text abbreviations.
TheAntiTerrorist 3 years ago
TheAntiTerrorist-
Has any of what i posted earlier been independently verified by a Constitutional attorney?
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago
Dave, I have to second TAT's use of the Freeman technologies. It's a shame you refuse to even have an open mind to this. Being a Video Journalist and all. And especially since you promote freedom. How can you be truly free if you refuse to even challenge their own words and then use them against them.
Google: Robert Menard ( who has had National Success in Canada & New Zealand) Winston Shrout who explains the use of Bonds secured by your Birth Certificate to Set Off Public Debt
Beatleha 3 years ago
Mary Elizabeth Croft and her free pdf file Book here on the internet.
These people have perfected the movement, have had tremendous success, and Freemen like TheAntiTerrorist or Sovereigns like myself appreciate their research.
I have tried in vain to comment about this before, but you censored me. Funny, my close friend in the Mask wasn't censored and all of a sudden you're honored...
You might want to Google: Shrout in Kelowna or thinkfree(dot)ca or winstonshroutsolutionsincommerce(dot)com
Beatleha 3 years ago
Maybe you might look up HJR 192 passed June 5th 1933. It is when they took substance out of our money, and the Government guaranteed payment of all public debt by the citizens. This doesn't just mean public streets or public works. It means you can't pay a debt with something of no value. So therefore by filing a 1099OID with (for instance) a Sears receipt and having their Tax ID #, you can get your FRNs back.
Beatleha 3 years ago
The next time you get a utility bill or even a Court order to Pay Bail for a traffic violation simply write diagonally on the Remittance Slip
Accepted for Value
Exempt from Levy per HJR 192 June 5th 1933
Autograph & Date
UCC 1-207 & 1-308
And it's paid....
Remittance = Is a form of money. It's money sent from one Merchant to another, either in Bill of Exchange, check, specie or otherwise. It's a piece of paper worth the amount claimed.
Exemption ID # 123-45-6789 (SSN)
Beatleha 3 years ago
Next time you SUBMIT an APPLICATION for REGISTRATION think about what those words mean.
- Submit: To agree to another's will or to leave to another's discretion. Form of Surrender. ALWAYS voluntary. Implies lawful right to fight.
- Application: Means to 'beg, plead, petition, implore, entreat or request. Look at the assumptions those words create. He who begs knows exactly what they are begging for.
Beatleha 3 years ago
They are acknowledging the authority to grant or if it doesn't exist, they are willing to create it through transference. ALWAYS Voluntary
- Registration: To sign over for safe keeping. ALWAYS voluntary. Abandons complete ownership for partial.
- Must: Legally can be synonymous with 'may'. Has two senses: Imperative or a directive. One creates obligations, the other defines conditions. ALWAYS a directive when used with 'apply'.
Beatleha 3 years ago
DELIVERY - A voluntary transfer of title or possession from one party to another.
Mom "delivered" a biological entity into the hands of the State Official (The Doctor) who had a license and a bond, and based on that there was an Application of Live Birth filled out and a trust situation was setup - Foreign Situs Trust
That trust was funded by the "International" (Dept of Treasury) possibly the IMF
Beatleha 3 years ago
The next time you get a utility bill or even a Court order to Pay Bail for a traffic violation simply write diagonally on the Remittance Slip:
Accepted for Value
Exempt from Levy per HJR 192 June 5th 1933
Autograph & Date
UCC 1-207 & 1-308
Exemption ID # 123-45-6789 (SSN)
And it's paid....
Remittance = Is a form of money. It's money sent from one Merchant to another, either in Bill of Exchange, check, specie or otherwise. It's a piece of paper worth the amount claimed.
Beatleha 3 years ago 3
i don't think i've censored you but i do sometimes censor people who advocate violence or post spam. it's my sandbox.
RidleyReport 3 years ago
Hi AT. I agree with most of your comment except for the "Sir" part as of that moment in time you have no way to assertain the man you are speaking with is a knight of the realm. I would simply say. For and on the record etc. If you want to let him know you are speaking to him look at him and ask him who he is, does he have documented proof to display and enter into the record,that he has standing here today. If so then let him STAND(not sit) and display it, then allow him enter it.
spoonog 3 years ago
Wow, what a shaft.
chewbaca1989 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
EVERYONE: PLEASE WATCH THIS: /watch?v=nUB79WJ9ktQ
TAINTED HALLOWEED CANDY FROM POISON MILK POWDER FROM CHINA
MrDuffy81 3 years ago
Are you still paying taxes? Secede now, personally. Withdraw consent.
FTLIan 3 years ago 2
what exactly where the weapons/explosive charges? and is it "obstructing the duties of a fed. officer"?
36 years is incredibly steep. if he had raped someone, he'd get maybe 6 years or so. this is ridiculous. is he planing to appeal?
hpso12xu 3 years ago 2
In 1996 the gov charged a group of people in Montana with several crimes. They were known as the Freemen and espoused many of the things Riley seems to have used. All but two of the Freemen were found guilty and most were sentenced to lengthy prison sentences.
bbburton 3 years ago
I heard the freemen assaulted a tv news crew and grabbed their gear is that true? It may have been on the freemen property however.
RidleyReport 3 years ago
That's odd, I thought posted a reply to your question. There were two events involving news crews. One that happened outside the house in the yard, and the other with a different news crew from another network that happened on nearby road. The first news crew was ordered off the property. The second one had their camera taken.
bbburton 3 years ago
PLease don't confuse the "Freemen" of 1966 with the Menard & Shrout movement. Since that time there has been 42 years of intensive de-construction of the Statutes, Codes, Acts etc, leading to many successes. One of the strongest new technologies is to have your Bond in place BEFORE dealing with the courts...
Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance. - Albert Einstein.
I never post spam or promote violence.
Beatleha 3 years ago
The events involving the group known as the Freemen that I was referring to happened in 1996, not 1966. I'm not aware of the Menard & Shrout movement. And I wasn't condemning, just making an observation.
bbburton 3 years ago
I hope you'll look into Menard & Shrout.
Since the courts are registered as Corporations for Profit on the stock market. They are subject to liens too. If you have an unlimited US Treasury Bond based on your Birth Certificate, you can basically "subrogate" the case. I'm painting in broad strokes. But it isn't THAT complicated. It is possible to liquidate the Judge's Bond, and the prosecution team's bond. Appoint your Defense counsel as your Fiduciary Debtor, now really watch him work for you.
Beatleha 3 years ago
great report! 5 stars
greenback001 3 years ago
the totalitarians arrived even in NH now - the is no justice for the citizen anymore
...sick state of the nation.
Sideshowbobx 3 years ago
how DARE people defend themselves, and stand up to authority.
*sarcasm intended*
dnHooligan 3 years ago 7
RidleyReport-
This is what the shirtless guy is talking about;
/watch?v=_HfsKO22Ycc (specifically at 3:45)
/watch?v=klwWcp9eiPw
/watch?v=jlOUXWQP-KM
This should probably be independently verified by a constitutional attorney.
CRAPCANNONS 3 years ago 2