This video is so stupid and pointless on many levels. So basically, the whole time the student was trying to prove that he trusts the professors lectures on faith and he dosent know if he has a brain or not.. WELL MY FRIEND WHY DONT YOU CONTACT YOUR COLLEGES ADMINISTRATORS AND SEE THAT MANS QUALIFICATIONS AND DEGREES IF YOUR SO SMART... i hate videos like this that make many poor slow people gain acceptance of religion. Faith is never good enough to prove anything and cant be relied upon.
@maxerican well diffrence of opinion ... the student was just answering thw profesor the way he was questioning.... an now i ask u... the day science can cleaerly define the existance of life and MOTHER NATURE...thr day u come to me and debate on the topic of God... until then u have no answer except 'Random'
@airborne2002 infact there is an explanation for the existance of the universe we live in .. i dont know which world you live in .. scientists are making ground making discoveries every year.. and just because we dont have an answer for everything dosent prove the existence of god.. and if you believe in it .. it just shows that you have a weak character and you lack the ability to question the world you live in and just give up and rely on absurd stories that come from religion...
@DragonxxxFire Which scientists are you talking about? give me a few examples. and you're life must have been a mess if you ended up relying on god to fix it. pathetic.. thats all i gotta say.
@maxerican Einstein believed in a creator of this Universe, a Deity, a God.
Abdul Salaam was the first to win Nobel Prize in Pakistan and his discovery was actually greater than Einstein's, but they forced the Media to block most of his fame to a minimum, that's why only a minority of people know about him.
But yes, both GREAT scientists believed in a creator, what do you got? Nothing.
@maxerican as i said when the science does the complete discovery on existance of life which really makes sence u cant deny the existance of God/Creator.. as u know take an example of a Car ... it cant just start to work widout a driver... tht makes sence... but science has yet not discovered what is Nature.. so untill than bye bye take care
@airborne2002 Lmfao bro . go to college . get an education . get out of your little bubble. then hopefully everything will make sense. haha Thats all i gotta say. your examples are lame and once again you are only making yourself sound more stupid.
@maxerican the small little thing you people steal cant understand is that even if we cant prove the existence of god ,you cant disprove it ...so why should you come over here insult my religion and ask me to prove that me god exist >why cant i ask you the opposite,dont even try cause men have tried before to disprove god NO ONE COULD ,and dont give me that science crap cause there is so many things we dont know and science is far from perfect ,we steal dont know whats exactly on mars
Wrong it doesn't mean that you can continue to live in sin and will be forgiven. Jesus was the son of God as we all are,but he managed to live away from sin! Man is always full of excuses just like Adam and Eve!Where they forgiven? you bunch of moronic naive people you really think you can manipulate the Lord! try again!
@airborne2002 First I don't have to measure my words,can take the heat get out of the kitchen! second,this was a reenactment of the thrue conversation of Einstein and his proffesor! So I don't know where are you trying to go! If you're referring to the post on sin,wake up buddy for is reality!
Wow. The ignorance displayed in this video is appalling. Evolution has been observed. It is at work when bacteria undergo mutations which enable their resistance to antibiotics over the course of days, months, or years. The evidence that we are evolved primates is excellent. It is evolution, and not intelligent design, which explains all of the anatomical flaws and vestigial organs in the human body.
@nyscholartist ok for the sake of Argument i believe u.. can u explain how did the first species came into being ??? and in 2 pairs... reproductive organs,... dont have to escape any of them
@airborne2002 The first species which came into being was the first self-replicating molecule. Pairs and reproductive organs evolved by mutation and selection hundreds of millions of years thereafter. The question of abiogenesis is a vexing one. Nobody knows exactly how life began. However, it is no argument to say "We don't know, we have no evidence one way or another, therefore God did it." The logical thing to do would be to suspend judgement.
@airborne2002 If the existence of an intelligent designer is inferred, then all one has is the designer, not the personal God of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, who watches over everyone, answers prayers, takes sides in wars, tells us what we can or can't eat, who we can have sex with, in what position, and during what times of the year, and so forth. In other words, the inference of a designer, even if it were valid, wouldn't prove the truth of any religion.
@nyscholartist it wouldnt prove the Truth of Any specific religion but it proves the existence of a super natural being who has done all this... every single religion makes an artical of belief tht God Exists.. so unless and until science doesn't give a satisfactory explanation to the existance of life.. the Theory of Religoin is Valid :D ... Fact leaves no room for possibility --_o
@airborne2002 It doesn't. We just don't know how life began on earth. Since we have zero data/evidence, we are as justified in inferring that aliens planted life here as in inferring that a supernatural being did it. There are many religions that do not posit a creator. Jainism, Buddhism in its purer forms, and many shamanistic religions are entirely atheistic. Your approach involves using what is known as the "God of the gaps."
@airborne2002 The "God of the gaps" is a god who is inserted wherever science does not yet have a satisfactory explanation of a particular phenomenon. Once science provides a satisfactory explanation, then God is removed from what was once a gap. As science discovers more and more about the universe, the need to invoke supernatural and magical beings diminishes further and further. We thought the human body was designed, but it is very obviously evolved and contains numerous design flaws.
@airborne2002 The point is that the idea of God is unfalsifiable (and therefore not a strong idea). It can never be disproven. Theists should realise that there are no strong arguments for the existence of God. Merely saying "science hasn't (yet) told us how life began on earth, so God must have done it" is no more logical than saying "Science hasn't (yet) told us how life began on earth, so the great green goblins from Andromeda must have done it." In the end, it really is all about faith.
@nyscholartist yup Faith is the main branch of Religion .... it just like i have a connection with Him(who doesn't exist acording to athiest) i feel like he listens to me when i want something.. and i have seen such unexpected things which i wished from him.. Its Just Faith which keeps me going and Debating people like u... Becoz u have made ur brain not to accept things... and mine has also.. but vise versa..So at the end If he exists or not.. we will only know after Death.. so see u :) peace
@airborne2002 That's fine. I do think some idea of God is defensible rationally. For instance, the philosopher, Immanuel Kant, argued that God is a postulate of practical reason as the cause of nature who harmonises teleological laws with the efficient causes of nature and contains within itself the ground of the connection between happiness and virtue. To say that something is "well-pleasing to God" is to say that it conforms with the moral law.
@airborne2002 If there is a God, then I can't imagine that he/she/it would care which religion a person practised, how many nafal prayers she offered, how many ghazals he sang in his praise. It stands to reason that all such a deity should care about is whether we lived a morally upright life, behaving compassionately toward others, helping the poor and the needy, caring for the orphans and for animals, etc. Peace to you, bhai. Apna khyaal rakhna :)
@nyscholartist well endless arguments on tht..:) as challenged by Zakir naik... if one can show a single verse from Quran which is against Humanity AS A WHOLE... which u may think is immoral.. might only be immoral becoz of ur Thinking.. as drinking alcahol is immoral in Asian conutries but is Moral in the West.. many example may reasons.. no one is perfect to answer them all :) Peace
@airborne2002 There's plenty of immorality in Islamic teachings and preachments. Islam, for example, reifies patriarchy and makes the man the head of the household. That's why the daughter receives half the inheritance of the son; a man can beat his wife lightly if she's guilty of nushuz (recalcitrance) but a wife cannot take even remotely similar disciplinary measures against her husband; men have a daraja (degree/rank) above women according to Surah al-Baqarah; ...
@airborne2002 ... men can approach their wives as a harithu (tilth); and women cannot offer a khutbah or recite the adhaan. Muslim scholars argue that this is because men and women have been created with different capacities which make men more suited to the task of running the household. But there is no evidence that this is true. There are slight differences in male and female brains, but nothing to suggest that men are better suited to being breadwinners or leading a family.
@airborne2002 As I said, we're talking about running a household and caring for a family. We're not talking about construction work, military combat, or weightlifting. Differences in physical strength are irrelevant to the task of running a household and caring for a family.
@airborne2002 All of the psychological and sociological evidence suggests that men and women are equally capable of running the household. That men are generally physically stronger is irrelevant to the task because we're talking about a social responsibility, not construction work or weightlifting. Patriarchy is therefore irrational and, since it generally causes suffering for women, it is also evil. Islam supports patriarchy; therefore it is evil for doing so.
@airborne2002 It wouldn't matter if Islam permitted women to take jobs. It still doesn't permit them to be the heads of a family/household. That is why all of the rules of inheritance, who can beat whom for the sake of discipline, who can approach whom as a tilth, who has a rank above whom, etc. are the way they are. Muslim scholars insist that this is because men are better suited to being managers of the household. That has nothing to do with jobs.
@airborne2002 Similarly, consider the story of the Banu Qurayzah. In 627 C.E., the Banu Qurayza betrayed the Muslims by joining the alliance formed by the Quraysh against the Prophet and his community. When the Prophet decided to take the Banu Qurayza to task the leaders of the tribe requested the arbitration of Sa'd ibn Mu'adh of the Banu Aws tribe, their ally, and promised to accept whatever he determined to be their fate.
@airborne2002 "When you draw near to a town to fight against it, offer it terms of peace. If it accepts your terms of peace and surrenders to you, then all the people in it shall serve you at forced labor. If it does not submit to you peacefully, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; ...
@airborne2002 and when the LORD your God gives it into your hand, you shall put all its males to the sword. You may, however, take as your booty the women, the children, livestock, and everything else in the town, all its spoil. You may enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the LORD your God has given you" (Deuteronomy 20:10--14)
@airborne2002 The Prophet supported Sa'd ibn Mu'adh's decision and even declared that his decision was in accordance with God's law. As a result, the men of the tribe were slaughtered en masse and the women and children taken as slaves. Even if one accepts capital punishment as an appropriate penalty for traitorous political dealings, there is no conceivable moral justification for taking children as slaves.
@nyscholartist do u know the Rules of keeping a slave??? the companians said we were affraid tht the rights of Slaves were so much tht we tought may b Prophet Mohammed(saW) could giv the slaves rights in our will....
@airborne2002 That is a terrible defence of slavery. Slavery is evil irrespective of how one takes care of his slave. Your question is a bit like asking, "Do you know the rules of rape? The companions said we were afraid of the rights of women being raped so much that we thought we should give the raped women rights in our will." You can gently rape a woman, offer her tea afterwards, and send her flowers a week later. That still doesn't make rape any less evil. The same is true of slavery.
@airborne2002 It is very difficult to see how this is in any way morally defensible, even in respect of Islam's own preachments concerning compassion and philanthropy, or how it can be seen as of a piece with the project of gradually eradicating the institution of slavery. By ordering the Muslims to take the Jewish children as slaves, the Prophet was endorsing slavery. Slavery is evil. Islam supports it; therefore Islam is evil.
@nyscholartist i said so AS A WHOLE... u think it is Evil but Slavery was practised a lot at tht time... Mohammed Gave such instructions and right to Slaves tht it was hard to keep a slave.. and Freeing a Slave was a kiond of Big reward..
u break a fast.. u have to free a slave as a palenty
@airborne2002 Slavery is objectively evil, my friend. Saying that it was practised a lot at that time doesn't make it morally acceptable. Female infanticide was practised a lot at that time too. That doesn't make it right. If the Prophet included all of these steps to grant slaves their emancipation, then why did he take Jewish children as slaves? That is hypocrisy. And no one ought to respect hypocrisy.
@airborne2002 Anyway, sorry if you feel offended. I'm just being honest about what I think. I used to be a practising Muslim, but no longer. Consider the following: the Qur'an says that the Jews, the Christians, and the Sabaeans, anyone who believes in God, in the Last Day, and performs good deeds, they shall succeed in the Hereafter. That is remarkable when one considers that Christianity and Islam have doctrines that conflict with one another.
@airborne2002 One religion says that Jesus is the Son of God, God incarnate, and saviour of humanity; the other religion denies that God can have a son and treats Jesus as a prophet of Islam. One religion says that we are born with original sin; the other says that we aren't. And so on. But if both can enter heaven, then that alone suggests that God doesn't really care about these details. Rather, He cares about whether you believed and lived a good, morally upright life.
@nyscholartist u have totaly deprived understanding of islam islam accepts those people who followd jesus at his time and the people he was sent to but after when muhammad pbuh came we beliieve he should be followed so only those christians(jews) of that time who reached his message and accepted his teachings will go heaven not all and we dont say that all will deprived human being speaking too soon ignorant
@bronxboy129 Wrong. Your comment displays a profound misunderstanding of evolution. We evolved from primate ancestors. The branch which separates our closest relatives (with whom we share 98% of our DNA, the chimpanzees and bonobos) split off 6 million years ago. Evolution does not say that we evolved from "monkeys who died." It says that we evolved from common primate ancestors. Do your homework before making ignorant remarks.
You can actually see evolution, in bacteria and cells. Diseases evolve to become immune to antibiotics. 'Survival of the fittest' is evolution, for example, If a lion is very strong, it can defend itself well against other lions. This raises it's chances of mating with a strong female, these characteristics would be passed onto their spawn genetically, and they would also be strong, which would be passed onto their spawn, and so on. Therefore, the species is EVOLVING.
@GraffitiBMXskate Should the scientist, who is aware of the natural causes and of the factors determining each step of creation towards perfection, of mankind's evolution, of the minute accuracy and exactitude that rules every change in the nature that surrounds us, come to believe that these wondrous laws and amazing interactions have somehow *fortuitously* emerged out of *mindless* matter?
@1tabligh Alot of big words there, but you didn't really say anything. I assume you refering to the big bang theory? Because evolution is the development of life, once it already exists, it has nothing to do with the creation of life. But in response to your overly complicated and intensely small minded statement; you have a misunderstanding of basic probability. Just because something is highly improbable doesn't make it impossible. There is more evidence suporting the big bang than for a God.
If you will still persist in your ignorance at least assure me as to when this *big bang* created itself-whether it did it before it came into existence, or afterwards?
If you say afterwards, your assertion is absurd. Because it is impossible for a thing to create its own self when it was already created.
@1tabligh Ignorance? "Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Religion is the denial of observation so that faith can be preserved." I ask you the same question; when did your god create himself? And you cannot take the quran as fact. Just because you believe strongly in something, does not make it true. It is just a book.
@GraffitiBMXskate Is it at all feasible to regard all the geometry, functioning and movement of the universe as the outcome of matter in its ignorance?
The purpose of your assertion would be that the *big bang* made itself twice. It would mean that its first endeavours consisted in creating itself, and when it was quite ready and created, it created itself again. This is the most *absurd* and impossible theory-the acquisition of what is already acquired.
If you say that it created itself before it came into existence, it is really *stupid*. Because it was absolutely nothing before it came into existence.
How is it possible for a non-existing thing to create another thing (*big bang*) ? You consider my belief in an existing thing (God) that creates another non-existing thing (*big bang*) as absurd. But you do not consider your own, as to the non-existing thing having the power to create an already existing thing,(*big bang*) as absurd and stupid.
Be yourself the judge, and tell me whose theory is absurd and irrational.?
@1tabligh There wasn't any big bang happened, which scientists describe. The whole universe was came into existence in 6 days.And it is mentioned in QUR'AN.
@syedabdulwahab In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth (Universe) were joined together as one unit (atom) of creation, before we clove (exploded) them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?"
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth (Universe) were joined together as one unit (atom) of creation, before we clove (exploded) them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?"
How can it be supposed that belief in the existence of God is the acceptance of contradiction, whereas belief in the uncaused nature of an effect such as matter is not contradictory?
How could it be believed that matter should itself be the origin of millions of attributes and characteristics and thus be the equivalent of the purposeful, wise and all-knowing Creator?
I heard this same Dialogue b/w a philosopher professor and a muslim in a Yusuf estes lecture aswell named no brainer check it out its really amazing and humerous aswell and i m sure this is its remake /watch?v=AoNEfuEWtXc that debate between philosopher professor and a muslim starts at 0:14:30
i think its all which is inside human and depends how critically one think:) may be every one has different perception , meanings and spirtual stability:) ...............really
BOTH STUPID.., THERE IS DARKNESS!!! DEATH IS OPPOSITE OF LIFE..!!!
YOUR BRAIN IS NOT YOURS, ITS FROM GOD., LET ME ASK YOU BOTH, IF LOOK UP IN THE SKY, DO YOU KNOW THE END OF IT.? CAN YOU TOUCH AIR AND WHO MADE IT, WHERE IT COMES? CAN YOU MAKE WATER? IF WE ARE FROM APES SO WHERE THE APES FROM??
@airborne2002 i know it bro, it was taken from einstein and the professor but not all einstein said was true. they used philosophy in that matter. IN PHILOSOPHY BRO, THERE IS A RULE OF IT. it is in the middle of true and false. you can say if it is true if you believe and false if you dont... Ryt? so,, they discuss of it with no ANSWER.
mashAllah mashALlah....im happy and delighted to see that pakistanis are waking up, education is necessary to make a person a freethinker, and parting one's self from their inbuilt desires, emotions and biases makes reason perfect. keep up the good work, im dying to join you people, please tell me how do I do so?:)
@YKLABATYD yeh write i admitted tht long back :P lolzz but i have added the end words by my self ... read the script ... i converted the script into a play... :)
@XanderBBo The grandparent analogy was an example of seeing a thing in order to believe is not necessary , the answer professor gave was tht his presence proves tht his grandfather exists.. tht was right and so did the student rply tht the existance of this whole universe proves tht there is a creator... for further more info if u really want to learn watch my video "Does God exist" either go to my channel or the below link
@XanderBBo there ain't none cases of macro evolution or mutation (will only damage) and only microevolution...THE CONCEPT you mentioned about us giving birth continuously is not making sense to me sorry...and the fact of chimpanzees going to heaven is dumb as you...should know that every detail can not be answered like will i have iphone in heaven? see?!?!?
@RockStarNorthSide The reason we don't see macro-evolution within our own life-span is because that would be impossible. As for mutation only causing damage, you do realise the average amount of genetic mutations in a person is about 60, right? The reason I asked "do chimpanzees go to heaven?" is because they have almost identical DNA to us. If they don't have souls, but we do, where is the "soul gene"? If you have any other questions on the topic, I'd be happy to answer them. =)
@XanderBBo (1) why is macro evolution impossible to be witnessed? why why why? a simple compound changing itself to a complex one MUST have a transitional form...an intermediary form and this form must be in abundance yet we only show little fossils which themselves are surrounded by controversies. this evolution has to be witnessed in some way and how can an information be created in this simple life form that makes it complex? a random mixture of chemicals? (cont...)
yeah right...so you mean that if i ask a monkey to type for billion years continuously there is a probability that he would type a harry potter novel in its exact form?? or that a tornado in a junkyard would result in a Boeing airjet? no way man life cannot form on this earth like that spontaneouosly. for the sake of argument even if so then how can so much information be so accurate and interconnected to the whole environment? (cont...)
(2)mutation will only damage the cells but can never increase its ability you will only lose but never gain...this is't x-men or hulk were talking about and give me one single experiment which the modern complex technology has performed to mutate a frog into a i-don't-know-whatever?
(3) chimpanzeees have almost identical DNA so they are similar its like saying that clouds and watermeons are related since clouds are 100% water made and watermelons have 98% water in it...btw chimpanzees have 1000s of significant differences...
(4) every living individual have souls animals or humans and given by God the almighty
if YOU have any answers to them that would make sense without any scientific jargons in it or without any other field of science included in it just for the sake of creating confusion feel free to answer them :D
@RockStarNorthSide What scientific jargon do I use? Where do I mention any other field of science? Are you deificient in some sort of mental capacity?
@RockStarNorthSide I answered a few, the comments were all jumbled due to all the replies from people. I probably missed a few. Pretty much all the answers could be found by googling the question. Obivously you just don't want it to be true.
@RockStarNorthSide The reason we don't see macro-evolution within our own life-span is because that would be impossible. As for mutation only causing damage, you do realise the average amount of genetic mutations in a person is about 60, right? The reason I asked "do chimpanzees go to heaven?" is because they have almost identical DNA to us. If they don't have souls, but we do, where is the "soul gene"? If you have any other questions on the topic, I'd be happy to answer them. =)
Well, you can measure electricity and calculate the effects of gravity even though you can't directly see it. There are lots of things that can be measured without seeing the object or energy itself. We can make accurate assumptions based on what we have seen. Some things can be determined after seeing it only a few times, like knowing he has a brain for example.
However, no one has ever seen a god walking around. So it's too vague to assume a god exists since you can't confirm it's existence.
@DecepticonLeader did u watch the video till end.. at last the boy says a sentence "the existence of this world and universe confirms tht tere is a creator".. u can also watch my video "Creation the ultimate mystry" if ur really interested to learn..if tht wat Athiest clam..
@airborne2002, I watched the video until the end. However, concluding reality based on wishful thinking is unsufficient as an explanation. The theory regarding the making of this world has already been explained by science. And even if we haven't seen the making with our own eyes, it's more probable than creation through magic. Many has seen science at work, but very few or none has seen magic at work.
@DecepticonLeader i gave u a link to watch my other video on creation.. i explained how science explained the existence of this world and how much it makes sence hope you wil watch it.. just copy the link below and paste it on the adress bar after entering the youtube adress
MashaALLAH very good video & very good team work brothers. But plz 2 things 1 try to avoid MUSIC in the background & 2 Plz u guys act a bit cheap. Try to remove that thing.Rest everything is very perfect keep it up .JazakALLAHKhair................LoVe u guys for the sake of ALLAH.
MashaAllah :) but with all due respect, the music is unnecessary. Jazakumullahu khairan.
Dialahh 1 week ago
@THEBRU246 so u believe in God ???
airborne2002 2 weeks ago
This video is so stupid and pointless on many levels. So basically, the whole time the student was trying to prove that he trusts the professors lectures on faith and he dosent know if he has a brain or not.. WELL MY FRIEND WHY DONT YOU CONTACT YOUR COLLEGES ADMINISTRATORS AND SEE THAT MANS QUALIFICATIONS AND DEGREES IF YOUR SO SMART... i hate videos like this that make many poor slow people gain acceptance of religion. Faith is never good enough to prove anything and cant be relied upon.
maxerican 1 month ago
@maxerican well diffrence of opinion ... the student was just answering thw profesor the way he was questioning.... an now i ask u... the day science can cleaerly define the existance of life and MOTHER NATURE...thr day u come to me and debate on the topic of God... until then u have no answer except 'Random'
airborne2002 1 month ago
@airborne2002 infact there is an explanation for the existance of the universe we live in .. i dont know which world you live in .. scientists are making ground making discoveries every year.. and just because we dont have an answer for everything dosent prove the existence of god.. and if you believe in it .. it just shows that you have a weak character and you lack the ability to question the world you live in and just give up and rely on absurd stories that come from religion...
maxerican 3 weeks ago
@maxerican Your scientists are converting to religion every year...
Even you're greatest scientists believed in a CREATOR.
DragonxxxFire 4 days ago
@DragonxxxFire Which scientists are you talking about? give me a few examples. and you're life must have been a mess if you ended up relying on god to fix it. pathetic.. thats all i gotta say.
maxerican 4 days ago
@maxerican Where is your head?
Einstein was one of them, son, and also Dr. Abdul Salaam.
DragonxxxFire 4 days ago
@DragonxxxFire Who said einstein believed in god? lmfao idk where you are getting all this from. and who the hell is even abdul salaam? haha .
maxerican 3 days ago
@maxerican Einstein believed in a creator of this Universe, a Deity, a God.
Abdul Salaam was the first to win Nobel Prize in Pakistan and his discovery was actually greater than Einstein's, but they forced the Media to block most of his fame to a minimum, that's why only a minority of people know about him.
But yes, both GREAT scientists believed in a creator, what do you got? Nothing.
DragonxxxFire 3 days ago
@maxerican as i said when the science does the complete discovery on existance of life which really makes sence u cant deny the existance of God/Creator.. as u know take an example of a Car ... it cant just start to work widout a driver... tht makes sence... but science has yet not discovered what is Nature.. so untill than bye bye take care
airborne2002 3 weeks ago
@airborne2002 Lmfao bro . go to college . get an education . get out of your little bubble. then hopefully everything will make sense. haha Thats all i gotta say. your examples are lame and once again you are only making yourself sound more stupid.
maxerican 2 weeks ago
@maxerican well cant u just simply answer my Question??? Define Life and Nature???
airborne2002 4 days ago
@maxerican Faith, haha I found faith, I found God and my LIFE CHANGED!
Now that my eyes are opened, I can actually SEE GOD'S Actions and SIGNS in front of my eyes!
You just need to believe.
DragonxxxFire 4 days ago
@maxerican the small little thing you people steal cant understand is that even if we cant prove the existence of god ,you cant disprove it ...so why should you come over here insult my religion and ask me to prove that me god exist >why cant i ask you the opposite,dont even try cause men have tried before to disprove god NO ONE COULD ,and dont give me that science crap cause there is so many things we dont know and science is far from perfect ,we steal dont know whats exactly on mars
calian0770 16 hours ago
MashAllah another good video.
Majid1662 1 month ago
Wrong it doesn't mean that you can continue to live in sin and will be forgiven. Jesus was the son of God as we all are,but he managed to live away from sin! Man is always full of excuses just like Adam and Eve!Where they forgiven? you bunch of moronic naive people you really think you can manipulate the Lord! try again!
bronxboy129 1 month ago
@bronxboy129 wat was tht.... this talk was not on christianity vs Islam... watch it again budy
airborne2002 1 month ago
@airborne2002 First I don't have to measure my words,can take the heat get out of the kitchen! second,this was a reenactment of the thrue conversation of Einstein and his proffesor! So I don't know where are you trying to go! If you're referring to the post on sin,wake up buddy for is reality!
bronxboy129 1 month ago
@bronxboy129 so wats ur point actually O_o
airborne2002 1 month ago
@bronxboy129 Einstein was jewish....
1721nick 1 month ago
Wow. The ignorance displayed in this video is appalling. Evolution has been observed. It is at work when bacteria undergo mutations which enable their resistance to antibiotics over the course of days, months, or years. The evidence that we are evolved primates is excellent. It is evolution, and not intelligent design, which explains all of the anatomical flaws and vestigial organs in the human body.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist ok for the sake of Argument i believe u.. can u explain how did the first species came into being ??? and in 2 pairs... reproductive organs,... dont have to escape any of them
airborne2002 2 months ago
@airborne2002 The first species which came into being was the first self-replicating molecule. Pairs and reproductive organs evolved by mutation and selection hundreds of millions of years thereafter. The question of abiogenesis is a vexing one. Nobody knows exactly how life began. However, it is no argument to say "We don't know, we have no evidence one way or another, therefore God did it." The logical thing to do would be to suspend judgement.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 If the existence of an intelligent designer is inferred, then all one has is the designer, not the personal God of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, who watches over everyone, answers prayers, takes sides in wars, tells us what we can or can't eat, who we can have sex with, in what position, and during what times of the year, and so forth. In other words, the inference of a designer, even if it were valid, wouldn't prove the truth of any religion.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist it wouldnt prove the Truth of Any specific religion but it proves the existence of a super natural being who has done all this... every single religion makes an artical of belief tht God Exists.. so unless and until science doesn't give a satisfactory explanation to the existance of life.. the Theory of Religoin is Valid :D ... Fact leaves no room for possibility --_o
airborne2002 2 months ago
@airborne2002 It doesn't. We just don't know how life began on earth. Since we have zero data/evidence, we are as justified in inferring that aliens planted life here as in inferring that a supernatural being did it. There are many religions that do not posit a creator. Jainism, Buddhism in its purer forms, and many shamanistic religions are entirely atheistic. Your approach involves using what is known as the "God of the gaps."
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 The "God of the gaps" is a god who is inserted wherever science does not yet have a satisfactory explanation of a particular phenomenon. Once science provides a satisfactory explanation, then God is removed from what was once a gap. As science discovers more and more about the universe, the need to invoke supernatural and magical beings diminishes further and further. We thought the human body was designed, but it is very obviously evolved and contains numerous design flaws.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 The point is that the idea of God is unfalsifiable (and therefore not a strong idea). It can never be disproven. Theists should realise that there are no strong arguments for the existence of God. Merely saying "science hasn't (yet) told us how life began on earth, so God must have done it" is no more logical than saying "Science hasn't (yet) told us how life began on earth, so the great green goblins from Andromeda must have done it." In the end, it really is all about faith.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist yup Faith is the main branch of Religion .... it just like i have a connection with Him(who doesn't exist acording to athiest) i feel like he listens to me when i want something.. and i have seen such unexpected things which i wished from him.. Its Just Faith which keeps me going and Debating people like u... Becoz u have made ur brain not to accept things... and mine has also.. but vise versa..So at the end If he exists or not.. we will only know after Death.. so see u :) peace
airborne2002 2 months ago
@airborne2002 That's fine. I do think some idea of God is defensible rationally. For instance, the philosopher, Immanuel Kant, argued that God is a postulate of practical reason as the cause of nature who harmonises teleological laws with the efficient causes of nature and contains within itself the ground of the connection between happiness and virtue. To say that something is "well-pleasing to God" is to say that it conforms with the moral law.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 If there is a God, then I can't imagine that he/she/it would care which religion a person practised, how many nafal prayers she offered, how many ghazals he sang in his praise. It stands to reason that all such a deity should care about is whether we lived a morally upright life, behaving compassionately toward others, helping the poor and the needy, caring for the orphans and for animals, etc. Peace to you, bhai. Apna khyaal rakhna :)
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist well endless arguments on tht..:) as challenged by Zakir naik... if one can show a single verse from Quran which is against Humanity AS A WHOLE... which u may think is immoral.. might only be immoral becoz of ur Thinking.. as drinking alcahol is immoral in Asian conutries but is Moral in the West.. many example may reasons.. no one is perfect to answer them all :) Peace
airborne2002 2 months ago
@airborne2002 There's plenty of immorality in Islamic teachings and preachments. Islam, for example, reifies patriarchy and makes the man the head of the household. That's why the daughter receives half the inheritance of the son; a man can beat his wife lightly if she's guilty of nushuz (recalcitrance) but a wife cannot take even remotely similar disciplinary measures against her husband; men have a daraja (degree/rank) above women according to Surah al-Baqarah; ...
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 ... men can approach their wives as a harithu (tilth); and women cannot offer a khutbah or recite the adhaan. Muslim scholars argue that this is because men and women have been created with different capacities which make men more suited to the task of running the household. But there is no evidence that this is true. There are slight differences in male and female brains, but nothing to suggest that men are better suited to being breadwinners or leading a family.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist so how many Women r in Special forces.. y Men r more in Army then Women>???
airborne2002 2 months ago
@airborne2002 As I said, we're talking about running a household and caring for a family. We're not talking about construction work, military combat, or weightlifting. Differences in physical strength are irrelevant to the task of running a household and caring for a family.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 All of the psychological and sociological evidence suggests that men and women are equally capable of running the household. That men are generally physically stronger is irrelevant to the task because we're talking about a social responsibility, not construction work or weightlifting. Patriarchy is therefore irrational and, since it generally causes suffering for women, it is also evil. Islam supports patriarchy; therefore it is evil for doing so.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist Islam doesnt stop Women from doing Jobs.. there r some scholars who r against it but they differ...
airborne2002 2 months ago
@airborne2002 It wouldn't matter if Islam permitted women to take jobs. It still doesn't permit them to be the heads of a family/household. That is why all of the rules of inheritance, who can beat whom for the sake of discipline, who can approach whom as a tilth, who has a rank above whom, etc. are the way they are. Muslim scholars insist that this is because men are better suited to being managers of the household. That has nothing to do with jobs.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist isnt it better to talk on Facebook then this comment section???
facebook/shahzadbond
airborne2002 2 months ago
@airborne2002 Similarly, consider the story of the Banu Qurayzah. In 627 C.E., the Banu Qurayza betrayed the Muslims by joining the alliance formed by the Quraysh against the Prophet and his community. When the Prophet decided to take the Banu Qurayza to task the leaders of the tribe requested the arbitration of Sa'd ibn Mu'adh of the Banu Aws tribe, their ally, and promised to accept whatever he determined to be their fate.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 Since the Banu Qurayza were Jewish, Sa'd ibn Mu'adh cited the authority of the Torah to which they were subject:
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 "When you draw near to a town to fight against it, offer it terms of peace. If it accepts your terms of peace and surrenders to you, then all the people in it shall serve you at forced labor. If it does not submit to you peacefully, but makes war against you, then you shall besiege it; ...
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 and when the LORD your God gives it into your hand, you shall put all its males to the sword. You may, however, take as your booty the women, the children, livestock, and everything else in the town, all its spoil. You may enjoy the spoil of your enemies, which the LORD your God has given you" (Deuteronomy 20:10--14)
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 The Prophet supported Sa'd ibn Mu'adh's decision and even declared that his decision was in accordance with God's law. As a result, the men of the tribe were slaughtered en masse and the women and children taken as slaves. Even if one accepts capital punishment as an appropriate penalty for traitorous political dealings, there is no conceivable moral justification for taking children as slaves.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist do u know the Rules of keeping a slave??? the companians said we were affraid tht the rights of Slaves were so much tht we tought may b Prophet Mohammed(saW) could giv the slaves rights in our will....
airborne2002 2 months ago
@airborne2002 That is a terrible defence of slavery. Slavery is evil irrespective of how one takes care of his slave. Your question is a bit like asking, "Do you know the rules of rape? The companions said we were afraid of the rights of women being raped so much that we thought we should give the raped women rights in our will." You can gently rape a woman, offer her tea afterwards, and send her flowers a week later. That still doesn't make rape any less evil. The same is true of slavery.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 It is very difficult to see how this is in any way morally defensible, even in respect of Islam's own preachments concerning compassion and philanthropy, or how it can be seen as of a piece with the project of gradually eradicating the institution of slavery. By ordering the Muslims to take the Jewish children as slaves, the Prophet was endorsing slavery. Slavery is evil. Islam supports it; therefore Islam is evil.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist i said so AS A WHOLE... u think it is Evil but Slavery was practised a lot at tht time... Mohammed Gave such instructions and right to Slaves tht it was hard to keep a slave.. and Freeing a Slave was a kiond of Big reward..
u break a fast.. u have to free a slave as a palenty
u break a promise .. free a slave..
these all were wise steps to end slavery...
airborne2002 2 months ago
@airborne2002 Slavery is objectively evil, my friend. Saying that it was practised a lot at that time doesn't make it morally acceptable. Female infanticide was practised a lot at that time too. That doesn't make it right. If the Prophet included all of these steps to grant slaves their emancipation, then why did he take Jewish children as slaves? That is hypocrisy. And no one ought to respect hypocrisy.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 Anyway, sorry if you feel offended. I'm just being honest about what I think. I used to be a practising Muslim, but no longer. Consider the following: the Qur'an says that the Jews, the Christians, and the Sabaeans, anyone who believes in God, in the Last Day, and performs good deeds, they shall succeed in the Hereafter. That is remarkable when one considers that Christianity and Islam have doctrines that conflict with one another.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@airborne2002 One religion says that Jesus is the Son of God, God incarnate, and saviour of humanity; the other religion denies that God can have a son and treats Jesus as a prophet of Islam. One religion says that we are born with original sin; the other says that we aren't. And so on. But if both can enter heaven, then that alone suggests that God doesn't really care about these details. Rather, He cares about whether you believed and lived a good, morally upright life.
nyscholartist 2 months ago
@nyscholartist u have totaly deprived understanding of islam islam accepts those people who followd jesus at his time and the people he was sent to but after when muhammad pbuh came we beliieve he should be followed so only those christians(jews) of that time who reached his message and accepted his teachings will go heaven not all and we dont say that all will deprived human being speaking too soon ignorant
iloveafg123 1 month ago
@nyscholartist if evolution was correct there would be no more monkeys aroun because they would have evolved to humans! Dumb asses!
bronxboy129 1 month ago
@bronxboy129 correction (around)
bronxboy129 1 month ago
@bronxboy129 you should invest your money into sometime more creative!
bronxboy129 1 month ago
@bronxboy129 Wrong. Your comment displays a profound misunderstanding of evolution. We evolved from primate ancestors. The branch which separates our closest relatives (with whom we share 98% of our DNA, the chimpanzees and bonobos) split off 6 million years ago. Evolution does not say that we evolved from "monkeys who died." It says that we evolved from common primate ancestors. Do your homework before making ignorant remarks.
nyscholartist 1 month ago
the music is way too loud at times where i can barely understand ur words. other then that i really enjoyed it.
EsenTurkmen 2 months ago
great work dear
20093372 3 months ago
this is a good effort and a good video. but something like this existed before. It'd be great if the credits were given :)
Maansals 3 months ago
grossly plagiarised video ... Should have the courage to acknowledge original sources...
zahidirfan 3 months ago
gr8 work keep it u p
ceolda 3 months ago
You can actually see evolution, in bacteria and cells. Diseases evolve to become immune to antibiotics. 'Survival of the fittest' is evolution, for example, If a lion is very strong, it can defend itself well against other lions. This raises it's chances of mating with a strong female, these characteristics would be passed onto their spawn genetically, and they would also be strong, which would be passed onto their spawn, and so on. Therefore, the species is EVOLVING.
GraffitiBMXskate 3 months ago
@GraffitiBMXskate Should the scientist, who is aware of the natural causes and of the factors determining each step of creation towards perfection, of mankind's evolution, of the minute accuracy and exactitude that rules every change in the nature that surrounds us, come to believe that these wondrous laws and amazing interactions have somehow *fortuitously* emerged out of *mindless* matter?
1tabligh 3 months ago
@1tabligh Alot of big words there, but you didn't really say anything. I assume you refering to the big bang theory? Because evolution is the development of life, once it already exists, it has nothing to do with the creation of life. But in response to your overly complicated and intensely small minded statement; you have a misunderstanding of basic probability. Just because something is highly improbable doesn't make it impossible. There is more evidence suporting the big bang than for a God.
GraffitiBMXskate 3 months ago
@GraffitiBMXskate ....big bang theory?...
___
If you will still persist in your ignorance at least assure me as to when this *big bang* created itself-whether it did it before it came into existence, or afterwards?
If you say afterwards, your assertion is absurd. Because it is impossible for a thing to create its own self when it was already created.
1tabligh 3 months ago
@1tabligh Ignorance? "Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Religion is the denial of observation so that faith can be preserved." I ask you the same question; when did your god create himself? And you cannot take the quran as fact. Just because you believe strongly in something, does not make it true. It is just a book.
GraffitiBMXskate 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GraffitiBMXskate Is it at all feasible to regard all the geometry, functioning and movement of the universe as the outcome of matter in its ignorance?
1tabligh 3 months ago
The purpose of your assertion would be that the *big bang* made itself twice. It would mean that its first endeavours consisted in creating itself, and when it was quite ready and created, it created itself again. This is the most *absurd* and impossible theory-the acquisition of what is already acquired.
If you say that it created itself before it came into existence, it is really *stupid*. Because it was absolutely nothing before it came into existence.
1tabligh 3 months ago
How is it possible for a non-existing thing to create another thing (*big bang*) ? You consider my belief in an existing thing (God) that creates another non-existing thing (*big bang*) as absurd. But you do not consider your own, as to the non-existing thing having the power to create an already existing thing,(*big bang*) as absurd and stupid.
Be yourself the judge, and tell me whose theory is absurd and irrational.?
1tabligh 3 months ago
@1tabligh There wasn't any big bang happened, which scientists describe. The whole universe was came into existence in 6 days.And it is mentioned in QUR'AN.
syedabdulwahab 3 months ago
@syedabdulwahab In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth (Universe) were joined together as one unit (atom) of creation, before we clove (exploded) them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?"
The Quran 21:30
1tabligh 3 months ago
Respond to this video... Whatever science has discovered so far, was already mentioned in QUR'AN. READ QUR'AN.
syedabdulwahab 3 months ago
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.
"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth (Universe) were joined together as one unit (atom) of creation, before we clove (exploded) them asunder? We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?"
The Quran 21:30
1tabligh 3 months ago
How can it be supposed that belief in the existence of God is the acceptance of contradiction, whereas belief in the uncaused nature of an effect such as matter is not contradictory?
How could it be believed that matter should itself be the origin of millions of attributes and characteristics and thus be the equivalent of the purposeful, wise and all-knowing Creator?
1tabligh 3 months ago
I heard this same Dialogue b/w a philosopher professor and a muslim in a Yusuf estes lecture aswell named no brainer check it out its really amazing and humerous aswell and i m sure this is its remake /watch?v=AoNEfuEWtXc that debate between philosopher professor and a muslim starts at 0:14:30
Wolverinex3000 3 months ago in playlist More videos from airborne2002
@Wolverinex3000 they are presenting same message with different way...writer may not e director of movie
sanny819 3 months ago
@sanny819 did u check the link out brother the one i gave in the description
Wolverinex3000 3 months ago
subhanallah...thanx so much
MrsDaripena 3 months ago
they should have wiled out takbeers at the end
SamaiyaMalik 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i think its all which is inside human and depends how critically one think:) may be every one has different perception , meanings and spirtual stability:) ...............really
perfect job :)
bindasgirl420 4 months ago
Comment removed
bindasgirl420 4 months ago
I have no words, you people are awesome Enuf said
sherafghanaero 4 months ago
Mashallah.........Great work brothers............
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
syedumar1000 4 months ago 8
@syedumar1000 This is Albert Einstein Saying he is also a scientist
ceolda 3 months ago
GREAT YAR
LOVE U
umairGumair 5 months ago
Give credit to Albert Einstein mang
nomad656 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you want evidence that God exists, or are interested in 9/11 search Jonathan Cahn 1 - Harbinger the Warning, on youtube here.
IwillhonorGod 5 months ago
great yar
loinahmad 5 months ago
china don't come in our Allah otherwise u r gone like Russia remember that atheists
ilovladoo 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide
biomedcentral , c0m / 1741-7007 / 8 / 60
Science will always win, CAUSE IT WORKS.
S00rabh 5 months ago
@S00rabh well i want t share my other video with you ... plz check the video on my channel by the name "Does God exist " not this video the other one
airborne2002 5 months ago
Comment removed
S00rabh 5 months ago
Masha Allah
n00rsmd 5 months ago
The soul of this YouTubes creator just found a way to get darker.
Bramak17 5 months ago
Retard professor, retard acting, retard logic!! Try debating a real atheist like Dawkins or hitchens.
anirvanroy84 5 months ago
@anirvanroy84 won't make any difference
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago in playlist Videos from airborne2002
@RockStarNorthSide
Yes, wont make any difference cause there is no cure for retardness.
S00rabh 5 months ago
@S00rabh i consider you the same...
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide
Lol what?
S00rabh 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@S00rabh read my comments to you given below
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
great work
ServingIslam 6 months ago
I though there would be proof of god. I could explain superman like this.
Another failed attempt.
S00rabh 6 months ago
cheater copycat hai yah............ek purani video sey copied hai "Is God Evil?
Fred6191 6 months ago
@Fred6191 yess ofcourse yeh script mainey einstien key dialosuge with proffessor sey li hai.. i have directed it not Written it :P
airborne2002 6 months ago
@airborne2002 oh so u were the professor in the video; where r u from btw? & which song did u used as the music in the end? i really liked it
Fred6191 6 months ago
@Fred6191 i am from pakistan.... the music was "The Hulk movie theme"
airborne2002 6 months ago
@airborne2002 i meant where in pakistan?
Fred6191 6 months ago
@Fred6191 Karachi..
airborne2002 6 months ago
good student
uafkhurram 6 months ago
GOOD!!!
SuperAR786 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=o9ktS2U53Qg Write "Logical Evidences for Islam" and watch it...
There is A Creator. There a religion. Islam is the true religion.
shncsr 6 months ago
BOTH STUPID.., THERE IS DARKNESS!!! DEATH IS OPPOSITE OF LIFE..!!!
YOUR BRAIN IS NOT YOURS, ITS FROM GOD., LET ME ASK YOU BOTH, IF LOOK UP IN THE SKY, DO YOU KNOW THE END OF IT.? CAN YOU TOUCH AIR AND WHO MADE IT, WHERE IT COMES? CAN YOU MAKE WATER? IF WE ARE FROM APES SO WHERE THE APES FROM??
jimvargas123 7 months ago
@jimvargas123 watch the video again bro... and u need anger management classes ... this video is support of the concept of God
airborne2002 7 months ago
@airborne2002 i know it bro, it was taken from einstein and the professor but not all einstein said was true. they used philosophy in that matter. IN PHILOSOPHY BRO, THERE IS A RULE OF IT. it is in the middle of true and false. you can say if it is true if you believe and false if you dont... Ryt? so,, they discuss of it with no ANSWER.
jimvargas123 7 months ago
Comment removed
jimvargas123 7 months ago
@airborne2002 "he believes but there is a contradiction of what he believe."
jimvargas123 7 months ago
MUSLIM, (ا ل إ س ل ا م) { I S L A M } إن الدين عند الله الإسلام , Sunni Islam, Ahle Sunnat Wal Jama'at, SALAFI
hammadghulam 7 months ago
THIS IS SO GREAT MY DEAR BROTHER.MAY ALLAH REWARD YOU INSAALLAH..
IslamImann 7 months ago
Great
samadsarfraz1 8 months ago
@knifesniper69 I wish I ws tht student I woudve destroyed professors arguement nt wd agressivness but wd logic! Yeah thts the way!
mswallscorpio 8 months ago
Nicely done. =)
websterku 8 months ago
Masha Allah Such a Beautiful explain .....very nice.....
mohammed16373 8 months ago
mashAllah mashALlah....im happy and delighted to see that pakistanis are waking up, education is necessary to make a person a freethinker, and parting one's self from their inbuilt desires, emotions and biases makes reason perfect. keep up the good work, im dying to join you people, please tell me how do I do so?:)
manzar9121 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What the he'll is that supposed to mean?
KnifeSniper69 8 months ago
I wish I were in that room, I'm not as stupid as that "proffessor" I'd have a few questions you couldn't answer, hot..cold.,,, stfu
KnifeSniper69 8 months ago
@KnifeSniper69 u consider ur self still in the class ask me :P
airborne2002 8 months ago
@KnifeSniper69 Yep Knife Don't Consider it only in Class Say it here :) Ask us
fahimmahmoodmir 8 months ago
dumb
FIGHTFANNERD3 8 months ago
@FIGHTFANNERD3 daaaaaaaa :P
airborne2002 8 months ago
So lame simple copy and paste from "Student (Albert Einstein) Vs. Professor"
YKLABATYD 9 months ago
@YKLABATYD yeh write i admitted tht long back :P lolzz but i have added the end words by my self ... read the script ... i converted the script into a play... :)
airborne2002 8 months ago
There are 100,000's of documented cases of speciation occuring.
The grandparents analogy is flawed as we experience people giving birth regularly, however we don't see God creating Universe's regularly.
Gravity isn't an object, it's the name of a scientific theory which explains observed facts. Dropping a pencil shows us the effects gravity has.
I have a question for you, do chimpanzee's go to heaven?
XanderBBo 9 months ago
@XanderBBo The grandparent analogy was an example of seeing a thing in order to believe is not necessary , the answer professor gave was tht his presence proves tht his grandfather exists.. tht was right and so did the student rply tht the existance of this whole universe proves tht there is a creator... for further more info if u really want to learn watch my video "Does God exist" either go to my channel or the below link
and as for chimpanzee's lolz watch the video :P
watch?v=eurJZZna3Fc
airborne2002 9 months ago
@airborne2002 I left several comments on the video you linked.
I'm disappointed, I thought you were somewhat intelligent.
XanderBBo 9 months ago
@XanderBBo there ain't none cases of macro evolution or mutation (will only damage) and only microevolution...THE CONCEPT you mentioned about us giving birth continuously is not making sense to me sorry...and the fact of chimpanzees going to heaven is dumb as you...should know that every detail can not be answered like will i have iphone in heaven? see?!?!?
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide The reason we don't see macro-evolution within our own life-span is because that would be impossible. As for mutation only causing damage, you do realise the average amount of genetic mutations in a person is about 60, right? The reason I asked "do chimpanzees go to heaven?" is because they have almost identical DNA to us. If they don't have souls, but we do, where is the "soul gene"? If you have any other questions on the topic, I'd be happy to answer them. =)
XanderBBo 5 months ago
@XanderBBo (1) why is macro evolution impossible to be witnessed? why why why? a simple compound changing itself to a complex one MUST have a transitional form...an intermediary form and this form must be in abundance yet we only show little fossils which themselves are surrounded by controversies. this evolution has to be witnessed in some way and how can an information be created in this simple life form that makes it complex? a random mixture of chemicals? (cont...)
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
yeah right...so you mean that if i ask a monkey to type for billion years continuously there is a probability that he would type a harry potter novel in its exact form?? or that a tornado in a junkyard would result in a Boeing airjet? no way man life cannot form on this earth like that spontaneouosly. for the sake of argument even if so then how can so much information be so accurate and interconnected to the whole environment? (cont...)
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide If our exact DNA was planned... yes. But it wasn't.
If you get a monkey to type a billion letters at random.
And then another to do the same, they'd be different.
XanderBBo 5 months ago
@XanderBBo not satisfied with your answer...it is not solid
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
(2)mutation will only damage the cells but can never increase its ability you will only lose but never gain...this is't x-men or hulk were talking about and give me one single experiment which the modern complex technology has performed to mutate a frog into a i-don't-know-whatever?
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
(3) chimpanzeees have almost identical DNA so they are similar its like saying that clouds and watermeons are related since clouds are 100% water made and watermelons have 98% water in it...btw chimpanzees have 1000s of significant differences...
(4) every living individual have souls animals or humans and given by God the almighty
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide Clouds don't habe DNA..... please fail harder.
Do animals go to heaven?
XanderBBo 5 months ago
@XanderBBo you don't get the point do you? i was quoting reply to your fact of similarity btw apes and humans...sorry bro your messed up
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
if YOU have any answers to them that would make sense without any scientific jargons in it or without any other field of science included in it just for the sake of creating confusion feel free to answer them :D
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide What scientific jargon do I use? Where do I mention any other field of science? Are you deificient in some sort of mental capacity?
XanderBBo 5 months ago
@XanderBBo idiot... i said if you have answers to my above questions then give them with such requirements...
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide What Qs?
XanderBBo 5 months ago
@XanderBBo read the comments of this video...you'll find them...or else you're just making excuses
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide I was only looking at messages directed at me. I'll look for them now.
XanderBBo 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide I answered a few, the comments were all jumbled due to all the replies from people. I probably missed a few. Pretty much all the answers could be found by googling the question. Obivously you just don't want it to be true.
XanderBBo 5 months ago
@XanderBBo wow what an easy way for an atheist to answer all my questions.....GOOGLE
RockStarNorthSide 5 months ago
@RockStarNorthSide I didn't google... I was just pointing out that it would be a lot quicker for YOU.
XanderBBo 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RockStarNorthSide The reason we don't see macro-evolution within our own life-span is because that would be impossible. As for mutation only causing damage, you do realise the average amount of genetic mutations in a person is about 60, right? The reason I asked "do chimpanzees go to heaven?" is because they have almost identical DNA to us. If they don't have souls, but we do, where is the "soul gene"? If you have any other questions on the topic, I'd be happy to answer them. =)
XanderBBo 5 months ago
Well, you can measure electricity and calculate the effects of gravity even though you can't directly see it. There are lots of things that can be measured without seeing the object or energy itself. We can make accurate assumptions based on what we have seen. Some things can be determined after seeing it only a few times, like knowing he has a brain for example.
However, no one has ever seen a god walking around. So it's too vague to assume a god exists since you can't confirm it's existence.
DecepticonLeader 9 months ago
@DecepticonLeader did u watch the video till end.. at last the boy says a sentence "the existence of this world and universe confirms tht tere is a creator".. u can also watch my video "Creation the ultimate mystry" if ur really interested to learn..if tht wat Athiest clam..
watch?v=eurJZZna3Fc
airborne2002 9 months ago
@airborne2002, I watched the video until the end. However, concluding reality based on wishful thinking is unsufficient as an explanation. The theory regarding the making of this world has already been explained by science. And even if we haven't seen the making with our own eyes, it's more probable than creation through magic. Many has seen science at work, but very few or none has seen magic at work.
DecepticonLeader 9 months ago
@DecepticonLeader i gave u a link to watch my other video on creation.. i explained how science explained the existence of this world and how much it makes sence hope you wil watch it.. just copy the link below and paste it on the adress bar after entering the youtube adress
watch?v=eurJZZna3Fc
airborne2002 9 months ago
Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.....Mashallah, good job gentlemen :)
canadagirlskickass 11 months ago
MashaALLAH very good video & very good team work brothers. But plz 2 things 1 try to avoid MUSIC in the background & 2 Plz u guys act a bit cheap. Try to remove that thing.Rest everything is very perfect keep it up .JazakALLAHKhair................LoVe u guys for the sake of ALLAH.
farhanhashemi 1 year ago
@farhanhashemi the word Cheap was very bad.....
airborne2002 1 year ago
Science never says that you have to believe in a scientist through faith..
It says you have to believe in his proofs..
If an insane person 'proofs' something its good...
but If a respectable man preaches anything... its all bullshit without proofs..
we don't see evolution happening... we consider the proofs darven has given...
Ammarghaus 1 year ago
@Ammarghaus hmm so wats the point???
airborne2002 1 year ago
@airborne2002
Point is Arguments made in this video are not only wrong but lame...
Ammarghaus 1 year ago