I ran my soldiers as a democracy, they voted in the direction of what we should do. I, in turn noted all their objections and approvals, took both in good advice, and set them to battle as a knowledgable, as any democratic leader would do.
We do not want and shall not have a DEMOCRACY. AMERICA IS A REPUBLIC, NOT A DEMOCRACY. You give up your rights as a democracy. In a Republic the rights of the individual are as sacred as the mob. In a democracy, 51% control 49 %. Be smart. Study the difference. Anyone calling for a democracy is a traitor to America. There is not one word of mention of "democracy" in the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution with the Bill of Rights. Guess why...
@JonathanSeagullUtube I understand your point.... But, In a Republic, the vote would not be needed. Additionally, since we are supposed to be a United States, this vote on corporation description only holds weight in LA county, and will be back door'd in the future, guaranteed. Democracy is a lie. Don't take my word though, I am just a humble American. I used to believe I was in a democracy, then I learned the truth. Peace and health to you.
@godbluffvdgg Who better to govern then the people themselves? That is the essence of DIRECT democracy.NOT "representative democracy":
From wiki: "republic" A republic is a form of government in which the people, or some significant portion of them, have supreme control over the government and where offices of state are elected or chosen by elected people.."or some significant portion" " have supreme control " In this definition of 'republic' a portion gets 'supreme' control.
@JonathanSeagullUtube My friend, I don't know who supplied the definition but... In a true Republic, we are guided by rights inherent to man. Those selected to serve the people should only have the interest of those rights as their foremost duty. In a Republic there is no "supreme"; all are equal. But, alas that would only be in a perfect world. There will always be those who are greedy and believe themselves better than others. Maybe someday we'll learn. Peace and love 2U.
@godbluffvdgg In a republic, not ALL people are "significant" enough...in definitions of "republic"(googled), all say the same basic thing:
A state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives.
It is the "elected representatives" that we both agree are NOT the people to enable being "guided by rights inherent to man", "representatives" disregard it. In a direct democracy, are there "elected representatives" in which 'supreme power' is held?
@JonathanSeagullUtube In california "direct democracy" was used to keep Amazon from being taxed on goods sold in the state on the internet. It takes 500,000 signatures to make a law. By example, would you like Bill Gates to decide that anyone named Jonathanseagullutube will be thrown off you tube? If he wanted to, he could arrange to get 500000 votes. In a Republic your right to Youtube cannot be infringed. This countrys' government has usurped the true power of the people.
@godbluffvdgg If little billie can get 500,000 verifiable votes to untube Jonathanseagullutube, Jonathanseagullutube is good with that. Sorry, in a republic, from the definitions I have looked up, you DO NOT retain any particular rights. As a matter of fact, Wikipedia defines: A republic "offices of state are chosen by elected people" who "have supreme control over the government". These few can oust Jonathanutube, they dont even have to bother to gather 500 votes...
@godbluffvdgg Could it be that you have some sort of concept of "republic" that a google search is unable to define? Could it be that you have some sort of concept of "republic" that the writers of the constitution refer to once, yet what they meant by it is uncertain? Perhaps you need to create a high ranking website with info on this 'Republic' you so often refer to so us ignorant ppl can be enlightened. 500K signers = a __________. NOT "direct democracy".
@godbluffvdgg Wiki defines: Direct democracy (or pure democracy) is a form of government in which people vote on policy initiatives directly, as opposed to a representative democracy in which people vote for representatives who then vote on policy initiatives....
@godbluffvdgg Wikipedia defines: A republic is a form of government in which the people, or some significant portion of them, have supreme control over the government and where offices of state are elected or chosen by elected people. The term republic does not appear in the Declaration of Independence, but does appear in Article IV of Constitution "guarantee[s] to every State...a Republican form of Government." What exactly the writers of the constitution meant is uncertain.
@godbluffvdgg We need 'Participatory Democracy': "direct democracy", NOT 'representative' democracy/republic etc. Direct democracy, where ALL the people get to vote on all the important issues. Why limit voting to the "significant portion"? Who the frick is 'significant" and who is not? If we can facebook, we can discuss issues online. If we can bank online, we can vote online. Occupy the mind: direct democracy. Zeitgeist.
The Prime Law®* (The Fundamental of Protection) Preamble
*The purpose of human life is to prosper and live happily.
*The function of government is to provide the conditions that let individuals fulfill that purpose.
*The Prime Law guarantees those conditions by forbidding the use of initiatory force, fraud, or coercion by any person or group against any individual, property, or contract.
@Honeysiegel - OMG! Get your head examined for a brain. Ok, i just read more of your comments and I apologize...I did not realize you were mentally disabled.
Personhood is for people. Corporations should mind their own business. But don't just wait for your hometown to repeal corporate personhood. Kick corporations in the pocketbook; vote with your dollar and stop feeding the hand that bites you.
@Dewdaahman The signature of me, the owner of Zenadev can and will fire Obama and Janet Napolitano who are engaged in fraud and theft against me. The soulution is NOT to have another constitutional amendment. It is to enforce the inherent inalienable rights of a person already ratified by the founders in the Constitution.
All is not as it seems.
Law enforcement is derelict in their duty. Day 533 in We The People Against Corruption Campaign to Remove & Indict Obama et al.OBAMA IS A CROOKED ATTY
@HoneySiegalSurvivor how would the Patriots of the 13 colonies handle presentday Treason..? we both know the answer to that question, don't we..? they would do the same to the presentday Traitors as they did with King Georges' troops.. that day is coming when and if the American People loyal to the Constitution decide it's time..
@Dewdaahman Day 534 December 16/2011 in We The People Against Corruption to Remove and Indict Obama, DHS Janet et al. Obama wants a civil war. He was hired to coverup his lawfirm's action of bankrupting the United States of America using my co. of Zenadev. He has no conscience. Congress and the Supreme Court are being held hostage to my husband who has control of the global debt who hired Obama. Who blew up the buildings? Scare tactics continue. ONE HONEST JUDGE & I CAN FIRE HIM.Honey Siegal/HRS
@cdc51049 My corporation of Zenadev was used by the Bush and Obama administration to fund 911 and illegal wars. Imagine how I feel being denied my money and assets(billions)! because crooked attorneys made records of me DEAD to dissolve the USA. See my Channel. Google/YT manipulations not kosher. I can and will save the USA. Honey Siegal (NOT DEAD)
Don't be fooled in to blaming humans who are born in other parts of the world. They have little impact on your economic status. However politicians are quick to abuse an old instinct in humans (fear of others) to make them a scapegoat. It's just divide and conquer.
@danomaha420118 Don't be so sure -- Congress just gave the military the power to detain anyone, indefinitely. The Michigan GOP tried to legalize religious terrorism. Then there's that whole "personhood" nonsense.
@danomaha420118 yeah man, your wrong.. and the fact that EVERYTHING questionable, is deemed a "conspiracy", is bs.. we as the people, should ALWAYS question our gov' ,... our gov ' wouldnt do this you say?! man, do a little research, the US gov' is CLEARLY not what u think it is, and its people like you, that are halting the truly needed changes.
The irony here, is that as far as government and courts (and other corporations) are concerned, everything is a corporation...humans included. The upper case name is a corporation, or also referred to as your, "strawman", and that's who they deal with, not the individual custodian of the account. I agree with the spirit of what these folks are trying to do, however, the problem is far more systemic than these efforts are cognizant of.
@Goodalfred2 This is real. a US senator has created a petition for a constitutional amendment in response sanders.senate.gov/petition/?uid=f1c2660f-54b9-4193-86a4-ec2c39342c6c
THIS is what it means to be an American....TAKE ACTION!!!!! Define your purpose and fight the good fight everyday....grow up, put on your big boy pants, and quit your bit**in Nancy!!!!!
In the wrong hands Money is a murderer his brother hatred his sister corruption and all his aunts and uncles follow the orders! Physical and mentally forcing everyone who disagrees! Shame on them who are in a position of allowing this wrong doing to carry on!
@peacehumper you are correct on all counts. @everyoneelse WAKE the shit up! This 'movement' is by design.. Dig deeper and you will discover the 'revolution' and everything unfolding around it is happening in a dream within a dream. Yea, just like the movie inception... Now, but dont wait for the kick, bc when it comes, it will be to late. Pull yourselves out, now.
Why do we never go collectively as far as to question whether changing a constitution is the way to go? If this changes laws, then by many means it worked, no question. But why not also go about changing the factors that promote the behaviour of the wolves dressed as sheep? The profit motive, and the cyclical consumption required in an economy where money is the lifeblood, in an infinite growth paradigm will not sustain. Simple.
This should only be viewed as a symbolic gesture at best. Other problems are not represented in this argument, such as: Our courts are ALL maritime admiralty courts and they deal exclusively IN Commerce within the limits of the Uniform Commercial Code. In order to operate within commerce, all involved parties, ie. humans AND corporations are required to be CORPORATIONS, ie. dead bodies with trustees managing the estate of the dead. Your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is a CORPORATION. Nice Try, tho
Just when mankind begins to believe that all hope is lost, HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL! No wonder Los Angeles -- the city of angels -- is considered THE city to reckon with. Hallelujah!
Allright !!!!! Good for the people’s voices. Now all we need is the Canadian government to wake up and listen to the people who they tax to death and don’t listen to. The corporate party is over, they just have not realised it yet. Come on Canadians, stand Up !
In legal terms we are all corporations, it is call corporate person hood, it is your name spell in all Caps, that is your legal person by do this you could be harming yourselves in the process everything you get from the government (witch is a corporation) is addressed to your corporate person that could be putting something like this in place where you have no right in court because that is done it the same way just saying this is very dangerous.
@badaboomrock I agree, many jump on board to movements that are funded by our enslavers. Been there done that and am wiser for it. I do NOT want to be a corporation or maybe I should now that the corps are free from our rules/"freedom". talking about rights and democracy in the same venue. If there is a direct democracy the mob rules. Question to all, "Do you want some of your peers to say what rights you have?"
People your Creator gives your rights not government or the Constitution. The Constitution and the bill of rights is meant to limit government control, it only names some of your rights that the government that was created from the Constitution can not infringe on. What needs to happen is that the people need to force the government to follow the contract with the people which is the Constitution.
dear K5Doom ...... we know.
traviWAKEUPdoll 3 weeks ago
I ran my soldiers as a democracy, they voted in the direction of what we should do. I, in turn noted all their objections and approvals, took both in good advice, and set them to battle as a knowledgable, as any democratic leader would do.
hoseqt1 1 month ago
Dear US,
You are not the "World".
K5Doom 2 months ago 3
We do not want and shall not have a DEMOCRACY. AMERICA IS A REPUBLIC, NOT A DEMOCRACY. You give up your rights as a democracy. In a Republic the rights of the individual are as sacred as the mob. In a democracy, 51% control 49 %. Be smart. Study the difference. Anyone calling for a democracy is a traitor to America. There is not one word of mention of "democracy" in the Declaration of Independence nor the Constitution with the Bill of Rights. Guess why...
godbluffvdgg 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@godbluffvdgg DIRECT DEMOCRACY is what you see @1:00 on "results in favor of"?
JonathanSeagullUtube 2 months ago in playlist Revolt against bankster occupation
@JonathanSeagullUtube I understand your point.... But, In a Republic, the vote would not be needed. Additionally, since we are supposed to be a United States, this vote on corporation description only holds weight in LA county, and will be back door'd in the future, guaranteed. Democracy is a lie. Don't take my word though, I am just a humble American. I used to believe I was in a democracy, then I learned the truth. Peace and health to you.
godbluffvdgg 2 months ago
@godbluffvdgg Who better to govern then the people themselves? That is the essence of DIRECT democracy.NOT "representative democracy":
From wiki: "republic" A republic is a form of government in which the people, or some significant portion of them, have supreme control over the government and where offices of state are elected or chosen by elected people.."or some significant portion" " have supreme control " In this definition of 'republic' a portion gets 'supreme' control.
JonathanSeagullUtube 2 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube My friend, I don't know who supplied the definition but... In a true Republic, we are guided by rights inherent to man. Those selected to serve the people should only have the interest of those rights as their foremost duty. In a Republic there is no "supreme"; all are equal. But, alas that would only be in a perfect world. There will always be those who are greedy and believe themselves better than others. Maybe someday we'll learn. Peace and love 2U.
godbluffvdgg 2 months ago
@godbluffvdgg In a republic, not ALL people are "significant" enough...in definitions of "republic"(googled), all say the same basic thing:
A state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives.
It is the "elected representatives" that we both agree are NOT the people to enable being "guided by rights inherent to man", "representatives" disregard it. In a direct democracy, are there "elected representatives" in which 'supreme power' is held?
JonathanSeagullUtube 2 months ago
@JonathanSeagullUtube In california "direct democracy" was used to keep Amazon from being taxed on goods sold in the state on the internet. It takes 500,000 signatures to make a law. By example, would you like Bill Gates to decide that anyone named Jonathanseagullutube will be thrown off you tube? If he wanted to, he could arrange to get 500000 votes. In a Republic your right to Youtube cannot be infringed. This countrys' government has usurped the true power of the people.
godbluffvdgg 2 months ago
@godbluffvdgg If little billie can get 500,000 verifiable votes to untube Jonathanseagullutube, Jonathanseagullutube is good with that. Sorry, in a republic, from the definitions I have looked up, you DO NOT retain any particular rights. As a matter of fact, Wikipedia defines: A republic "offices of state are chosen by elected people" who "have supreme control over the government". These few can oust Jonathanutube, they dont even have to bother to gather 500 votes...
JonathanSeagullUtube 2 months ago
@godbluffvdgg Could it be that you have some sort of concept of "republic" that a google search is unable to define? Could it be that you have some sort of concept of "republic" that the writers of the constitution refer to once, yet what they meant by it is uncertain? Perhaps you need to create a high ranking website with info on this 'Republic' you so often refer to so us ignorant ppl can be enlightened. 500K signers = a __________. NOT "direct democracy".
JonathanSeagullUtube 2 months ago
@godbluffvdgg Wiki defines: Direct democracy (or pure democracy) is a form of government in which people vote on policy initiatives directly, as opposed to a representative democracy in which people vote for representatives who then vote on policy initiatives....
JonathanSeagullUtube 2 months ago
@godbluffvdgg Wikipedia defines: A republic is a form of government in which the people, or some significant portion of them, have supreme control over the government and where offices of state are elected or chosen by elected people. The term republic does not appear in the Declaration of Independence, but does appear in Article IV of Constitution "guarantee[s] to every State...a Republican form of Government." What exactly the writers of the constitution meant is uncertain.
JonathanSeagullUtube 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@godbluffvdgg We need 'Participatory Democracy': "direct democracy", NOT 'representative' democracy/republic etc. Direct democracy, where ALL the people get to vote on all the important issues. Why limit voting to the "significant portion"? Who the frick is 'significant" and who is not? If we can facebook, we can discuss issues online. If we can bank online, we can vote online. Occupy the mind: direct democracy. Zeitgeist.
JonathanSeagullUtube 2 months ago
Comment removed
JonathanSeagullUtube 2 months ago
The Prime Law®* (The Fundamental of Protection) Preamble
*The purpose of human life is to prosper and live happily.
*The function of government is to provide the conditions that let individuals fulfill that purpose.
*The Prime Law guarantees those conditions by forbidding the use of initiatory force, fraud, or coercion by any person or group against any individual, property, or contract.
dsneox07 2 months ago
Article 1
No person, group of persons, or government shall initiate force, threat of force, or fraud against any individual’s self, property, or contract.
Article 2
Force is morally-and-legally justified only for protection from those who violate Article 1.
Article 3
No exceptions shall exist for Articles 1 and 2.
dsneox07 2 months ago
I don't think this is what you think it is... :\
Message me.
EddieTables81 2 months ago
@Honeysiegel - OMG! Get your head examined for a brain. Ok, i just read more of your comments and I apologize...I did not realize you were mentally disabled.
PDXtransplant 2 months ago
Personhood is for people. Corporations should mind their own business. But don't just wait for your hometown to repeal corporate personhood. Kick corporations in the pocketbook; vote with your dollar and stop feeding the hand that bites you.
goodevaning [dot]wordpress [dot]com/2011/12/03/all-i-want-for-buy-nothing-christmas/
GoodEvaning 2 months ago
a corporation is a piece of paper..
Dewdaahman 2 months ago
@Dewdaahman The signature of me, the owner of Zenadev can and will fire Obama and Janet Napolitano who are engaged in fraud and theft against me. The soulution is NOT to have another constitutional amendment. It is to enforce the inherent inalienable rights of a person already ratified by the founders in the Constitution.
All is not as it seems.
Law enforcement is derelict in their duty. Day 533 in We The People Against Corruption Campaign to Remove & Indict Obama et al.OBAMA IS A CROOKED ATTY
HoneySiegalSurvivor 2 months ago
@HoneySiegalSurvivor how would the Patriots of the 13 colonies handle presentday Treason..? we both know the answer to that question, don't we..? they would do the same to the presentday Traitors as they did with King Georges' troops.. that day is coming when and if the American People loyal to the Constitution decide it's time..
Dewdaahman 2 months ago
@Dewdaahman Day 534 December 16/2011 in We The People Against Corruption to Remove and Indict Obama, DHS Janet et al. Obama wants a civil war. He was hired to coverup his lawfirm's action of bankrupting the United States of America using my co. of Zenadev. He has no conscience. Congress and the Supreme Court are being held hostage to my husband who has control of the global debt who hired Obama. Who blew up the buildings? Scare tactics continue. ONE HONEST JUDGE & I CAN FIRE HIM.Honey Siegal/HRS
HoneySiegalSurvivor 2 months ago
Awesome! We need more of this!
cdc51049 2 months ago
@cdc51049 My corporation of Zenadev was used by the Bush and Obama administration to fund 911 and illegal wars. Imagine how I feel being denied my money and assets(billions)! because crooked attorneys made records of me DEAD to dissolve the USA. See my Channel. Google/YT manipulations not kosher. I can and will save the USA. Honey Siegal (NOT DEAD)
HoneySiegalSurvivor 2 months ago
lol america is so fucked
you need a fucking restart button man
melonrampage 2 months ago
right on! this is justice at its best.
youngspiritsinging 2 months ago
Too good to be true? ....i think it is real and we sure worked for it.
Joerenfrew 2 months ago
seems like yet another red herring!
insightstar 2 months ago
@BeantownJim
How can a human being be illigal?
Don't be fooled in to blaming humans who are born in other parts of the world. They have little impact on your economic status. However politicians are quick to abuse an old instinct in humans (fear of others) to make them a scapegoat. It's just divide and conquer.
prophecyjoris 2 months ago
STUPID...crazy ass people.. get a grip the government wouldnt do this shit... ITS all conspiracy theory
danomaha420118 2 months ago
@danomaha420118 Don't be so sure -- Congress just gave the military the power to detain anyone, indefinitely. The Michigan GOP tried to legalize religious terrorism. Then there's that whole "personhood" nonsense.
BoredomCorner 2 months ago
@danomaha420118 yeah man, your wrong.. and the fact that EVERYTHING questionable, is deemed a "conspiracy", is bs.. we as the people, should ALWAYS question our gov' ,... our gov ' wouldnt do this you say?! man, do a little research, the US gov' is CLEARLY not what u think it is, and its people like you, that are halting the truly needed changes.
GoodFellows420 2 months ago
The irony here, is that as far as government and courts (and other corporations) are concerned, everything is a corporation...humans included. The upper case name is a corporation, or also referred to as your, "strawman", and that's who they deal with, not the individual custodian of the account. I agree with the spirit of what these folks are trying to do, however, the problem is far more systemic than these efforts are cognizant of.
rawenergyclub 2 months ago
Is this fake or real?
Goodalfred2 2 months ago
@Goodalfred2 This is real. a US senator has created a petition for a constitutional amendment in response sanders.senate.gov/petition/?uid=f1c2660f-54b9-4193-86a4-ec2c39342c6c
Method9 2 months ago
THIS is what it means to be an American....TAKE ACTION!!!!! Define your purpose and fight the good fight everyday....grow up, put on your big boy pants, and quit your bit**in Nancy!!!!!
WesleyGW 2 months ago
vive la libertee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
deckadad1 2 months ago
End illegal alien welfare.Then i'll believe this video.L.A. needs to deal with that first.Then the corporates
BeantownJim 2 months ago
Just vote Ron Paul 2012 and End the Fed! (as well as a few other unconstitutional 'entities'! :):)
MadWorldRadio 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the wrong hands Money is a murderer his brother hatred his sister corruption and all his aunts and uncles follow the orders! Physical and mentally forcing everyone who disagrees! Shame on them who are in a position of allowing this wrong doing to carry on!
TheLetsbegin 2 months ago
@peacehumper you are correct on all counts. @everyoneelse WAKE the shit up! This 'movement' is by design.. Dig deeper and you will discover the 'revolution' and everything unfolding around it is happening in a dream within a dream. Yea, just like the movie inception... Now, but dont wait for the kick, bc when it comes, it will be to late. Pull yourselves out, now.
JackVGallivan 2 months ago
Why do we never go collectively as far as to question whether changing a constitution is the way to go? If this changes laws, then by many means it worked, no question. But why not also go about changing the factors that promote the behaviour of the wolves dressed as sheep? The profit motive, and the cyclical consumption required in an economy where money is the lifeblood, in an infinite growth paradigm will not sustain. Simple.
jackdtroughton 2 months ago
This should only be viewed as a symbolic gesture at best. Other problems are not represented in this argument, such as: Our courts are ALL maritime admiralty courts and they deal exclusively IN Commerce within the limits of the Uniform Commercial Code. In order to operate within commerce, all involved parties, ie. humans AND corporations are required to be CORPORATIONS, ie. dead bodies with trustees managing the estate of the dead. Your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is a CORPORATION. Nice Try, tho
peacehumper 2 months ago
Just when mankind begins to believe that all hope is lost, HOPE SPRINGS ETERNAL! No wonder Los Angeles -- the city of angels -- is considered THE city to reckon with. Hallelujah!
thebobweb 2 months ago
There's SOMETHING in the Move:
TheMrAjaschi 2 months ago
YEEEEESS!!!
TheMrAjaschi 2 months ago
YAY LA!!!
Kimboalogo7 2 months ago
rock and rolll !
freeteepee 2 months ago
The day they will anounce the alien technology, THIS day will change the world. Now its just the begining of a world changing situation.
cadeschampss 2 months ago
The constitution was made before big corporations as we know it. No amendment is needed just enforcement. Wake up chuck and get busy enforcing.
1WORLDLIFE 2 months ago
Allright !!!!! Good for the people’s voices. Now all we need is the Canadian government to wake up and listen to the people who they tax to death and don’t listen to. The corporate party is over, they just have not realised it yet. Come on Canadians, stand Up !
KeepEmStraight 2 months ago
at last the voice of reason
poochbo123 2 months ago
Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 1819. Rothschild influence involved. Philanthropic inbred kleptomaniacs in a banktard suit.
4Th3Truthful 2 months ago
Press the "LIKE" button ...People!
scammedbygov 2 months ago
omg! good news?! wow
tigros999 2 months ago
Retards of America, please google 'human being vs natural person'.
JackVGallivan 2 months ago
...now that's shocking!! Way to go LA!!
Buckpwnz 2 months ago
how about interpret the damn document properly, instead of amending things?
PrimeTargetSecurity 2 months ago
GO LA!
ChemtrailsBelgium 2 months ago
In legal terms we are all corporations, it is call corporate person hood, it is your name spell in all Caps, that is your legal person by do this you could be harming yourselves in the process everything you get from the government (witch is a corporation) is addressed to your corporate person that could be putting something like this in place where you have no right in court because that is done it the same way just saying this is very dangerous.
badaboomrock 2 months ago 2
@badaboomrock I agree, many jump on board to movements that are funded by our enslavers. Been there done that and am wiser for it. I do NOT want to be a corporation or maybe I should now that the corps are free from our rules/"freedom". talking about rights and democracy in the same venue. If there is a direct democracy the mob rules. Question to all, "Do you want some of your peers to say what rights you have?"
anyonefindAMERICA1 2 months ago
People your Creator gives your rights not government or the Constitution. The Constitution and the bill of rights is meant to limit government control, it only names some of your rights that the government that was created from the Constitution can not infringe on. What needs to happen is that the people need to force the government to follow the contract with the people which is the Constitution.
badaboomrock 2 months ago
TIME TO STAND UP AND REGAIN OUR FREEDOM!!!!!!
youdevil6 2 months ago
NO NO NO... Not move democracy forward. It is the REPUBLIC forward NOT a democracy.
Beeirish1965 2 months ago 2
current(dot)com/shows/countdown/videos/sen-bernie-sanders-on-constitutional-amendment-overturning-supreme-courts-citizens-united-decision
grizzzlyjoe 2 months ago