I don't see the difference between the gov't of this country and any that we are supposedly fighting for people's freedom sake. I was sexually assaulted, tased, maced and brutalized by police in wisconsin. No lawyer will help me...there is no other legal recourse, "Freedom" and "justice" in this country is a joke. I'm not an anarchist per se - but...well - thanks for spreading truth, RJ. Unfortunately, it makes too much sense to ignore.
ok dick head, i agree with everything except near the end. Militarly we didnt loose viet nam we lost politicaly. we won almost every battle, even tet was failure for the enemy but not acording to that dick head cronkite. we havent lost anything anywhere else. OUR GOVERNMENT endangers it's own soldiers with self destructive idiotic rules of enguament. if our soldiers were UNLEASHED we wouldnt have any problems but we have weak ass nonmilitary serving dirtbags in office.
America has lost three wars since 1945, all three being fourth generation insurgencies. I'm not going to argue with you. See Martin van Creveld, Thomas Hammes, and John Robb
@howler505 shut up lol with that silly flag waving crap.. anywhere in the world, theres no brain under helmet.. any soldier (armed murderer under any flag) is as good as he is equipped, brainwashed and organized.. stop fantasizing and wake up.. you are just people same as anywhere else.. and you behave as Brits during their imperial conquests.. they stood well until natives got armed with pointed sticks to defend themselves against British bullies and rapists. Shame on privatized government.
This is why the X-men was one of my favorite superhero series. It's never just about one person playing the hero and saving the day, it's a community of the gifted whose collective efforts are used to the greater good. The best part, no one is FORCED to stay. It's a voluntary community.
The cold reality is that the state intentionally perpetuates policies that lead to unemployment, homelessness, crime, substance abuse, maladies, division, and anxiety and insecurity among the general public. It does this to justify a need for social services, law enforcement, tax increases, authoritative control, and many other socialist policies and programs. This is how government protects itself.
@RjWeapon wow. i do stand corrected. but on the other hand, why bitch about the police? they do protect property and personal rights. so they go overboard sometimes. you should be so lucky to have US police, they are relatively ethical compared to other countries police. the civil rights system of the USA, enforced by the government, is one of the most liberating and pro citizen civil rights systems in the world. you have the type of liberty most humans would kill for. quit bitching.
@chrispollock The police can't protect your property when they take half of it at the point of a gun. The police can't protect your liberty when they take half of it at the point of a gun. You were born with every human right, but the government took half of it, and you're saying it's stupid to speak out against it?
Fuck that.
No problem has ever been solved by people who decided to shut up and stopped bitching. People who speak out get shit done.
@Dirge987 police cannot take my property, they can only enforce the terms of the contract regarding the sale of the house, which is only fair. police cannot simply take my liberty, they can only detain me legally if i am in violation of the law. my rights only exist within a framework of safety and stability. people who bitch about stuff that doesn't make sense are wasting their time.
@chrispollock "my rights only exist within a framework of safety and stability"
Wrong. If you were magically transported to another planet with no safety or society, you'd still have all your rights, your ability to speak, and act, and live.
"they can only detain me legally if i am in violation of the law"
But the law is based on circular reasoning: the law is valid because the law says it's valid. Think about that and you'll just go in circles forever. The law is therefore not valid.
@Dirge987 if i am among 100 other people, and i have no codified right to speak without protection of the law, i can be killed. at least with codified law saying i am protected, i stand a greater chance of living.
law is valid because people vote to pass laws, not because the "law" has anything to say about it. without voters saying so, laws would have no meaning or meaningful enforcement.
@chrispollock Laws are not valid because a group of people vote for them, the last time I checked an appeal to popularity was a logical fallacy. If a group of people make a law that says a racial minority should be beaten to death, by your definition the law is valid. If a group of people make a law that women can and should be raped, then by your definition the law is valid. If the validity of a law comes from the people simply deciding it is, then it is NOT logically valid.
@chrispollock "they can only enforce the terms of the contract regarding the sale of the house, which is only fair"
But you never explicitly consented to their contract" You didn't choose to be born in a particular geographical location, which the government has a self-granted monopoly over. You also cannot reject the contract without the government's permission. And if you do reject their contract, you must accept a different contract. Not to mention every contract is consented to under duress
@Dirge987 you can leave a geographical area, you can reject signing the contract, you can rent apartments for the rest of your life. more anarchist utopian rantings.
@chrispollock "people who bitch about stuff that doesn't make sense are wasting their time"
People bitch because the laws and government don't make sense, and they have no logical authority if you really examined their ex post facto justifications.
However, aren't you just bitching about people bitching? That's a self-contradicting statement. If people are invalid because they bitch, then your argument against them is also invalid.
@Dirge987 pointing out the silliness of your claims is not a waste of time. laws do make sense for the most part, which involve property laws, anti violence laws, anti theft laws etc. your assumption that the government or police can act unilaterally or arbitrarily against citizens without due process demonstrates a lack of understanding on your part.
@Dirge987 incorrect. in the usa, for example, you have strong laws that defend homeowners from unlawful search and seizure. and if such things are done, you have legal recourse, which is less than what you'd find in less law based society. yes violence is force. if laws need to be enforced against those who would rob, rape and murder, then there's no problem there. govt. taxation isn't theft, taking from another purely to ingratiate yourself is theft
@Dirge987 oh go back to your college philosophy class, mr. logician. meanwhile, in the real world, our tax money provides a consistent level of baseline support for all manner of everyday things we take for granted. is it coercion. sure. is it a small price to pay. yes.
@Dirge987 in a market economy, the state does not own a monopoly on services paid for by taxes. if you don't like the water system, you can buy bottled water from the market, if you don't like the a govt. run electrical company, you can buy a generator or install solar panels. if you don't like govt. clinics, you can pay for your own doctor. again, if you're going to state vague principles, go back to college. taxation is more of a required cost for living in a stable nation, not theft.
If someone takes you money without your consent and buys you a burger with it, it's still theft.
If someone takes you money without your consent and donates it to a charity, it's still theft.
If someone takes you money without your consent and uses it for whatever they want, it's still theft.
You're obviously missing the gun in the room. An entity has the special privilege to use violence on whoever it wants with impunity, and you think it's going to play nice? Please.
@chrispollock I mean you can dress up the government in whatever pretty magical dress you want, but at the end of the day when you get into the nitty gritty of what it does, it's still force, and it's still theft. It doesn't matter where the money goes to, or who does it; the fact that an entity is taking the money from another entity without consent through violence makes it theft.
@Dirge987 if being required to chip in to support the basic services of the place in which you have the privilege of living, and if you have the freedom to leave that place at any time, then it isn't coercion. bye
@chrispollock Lol, if having a gun pointed at your head and being forced to pay, no actually have your things taken without your consent to an entity that uses your money however it pleases on things you don't want or use is the kind of place you want to live in, fine, just keep me out of it. Need I remind you that you need the government's permission to leave, and if you do leave, then you can only join another government. Leaving a plantation for another plantation isn't freedom dumbass.
@chrispollock And I find the "logic" or more accurately the false dichotomy of "take it or leave it" as a justification for the government laughably retarded. Hey man, if I move next to you and throw garbage into your lawn, you can just take it or leave it, right? If your society allows for slavery, you can just take it or leave it, right? If women or minorities have no rights in your society, you can take it or leave it. Lol, that's no even an argument, that's just half-thought justification.
@chrispollock "your assumption that the government or police can act unilaterally or arbitrarily against citizens without due process demonstrates a lack of understanding on your part."
And you assume that the government is valid, but where do they get the authority to do such acts? If you actually look at the "justifications", they are all fallacious:
@Dirge987 republic and capitalism are the best combo we have for prosperity and freedom thus far discovered. all utopian rantings are invalid and lead to tyranny and misery.
@chrispollock Your 'STFU and drink the Kool Aid' mentality is invalid, and leads to tyranny and misery. Could you represent a Fascist Totalitarian any more completely? Any thought process outside your narrow minded belief that everything is fine will lead to misery? That's fear mongering. Invalid? Oh, thanks! The fascist fear mongering totalitarian has deemed alternative thought 'utopian and invalid'. Prosperity and freedom. What's the National Debt? How many in Prison? Kool Aid?
@Brajabu74 i believe in republic and capitalism, not fascism. everything IS fine compared with the alternative (communism, theocracy, etc.) if by narrow minded belief you mean a strongly held opinion. utopian thought is invalid! check out the 20th century for examples of movements that move away from market systems into command economies for some "higher value". you see oppression follow. yes all the jobs created by all the freely earned wealth. economic mobility for producers. yes freedom!
@chrispollock Do you understand what has been transpiring since 9/11, and how little it has to do with anti-terrorism? 'So they go overboard sometimes' Yeah, now they have high powered automatic rifles. Do FBI agents writing their own search warrants sound 'pro citizen'. How? Expansion of FISA? No knock warrants? Criminalizing speech? Rendition? Legalized assassination? Roaming wire taps? Suspension of Posse Comitatus? Bailouts? No fly lists (how many?!)? This is freedom? You're a TOOL!
*yawn* well now that you're done with bitching about the evils of police and government, you can go back to doing nothing but listening to chomsky and smoking a bowl.
Response time? wtf is that? Cops don't show unless its drug related or murder. Assaults and domestic violence gets little to no response at all in Clayton County GA! Worst police department ever. And don't drive the speed limit in a neighborhood you are "not suppose to be in". You'll never get home fucking with these cops. Didn't know blacks couldn't drive by predominately white subdivisions at 9pm until I moved into said subdivision.
I totally agree. However, on the Columbine thing I sorta felt bad for those kids. I think that they were driven insane by the system and reacted in the complete wrong way. Anyway, yes we need to oust these corporates and their goons/the police. They do absolutely no good. They "crack down" on victimless crimes and hide when real things are going on. They're useless. Their system is set up to oppress people in every single way imaginable. Let's get rid of it, they need us not vice versa.
@RjWeapon You show another problem with drugs here. Nobody would pay $25 for a beer because it takes too many to get drunk, so instead they drink hard liqueur. The same exact thing happens with drugs and the prohibition, the high costs and the terrible punishments by the law tend to drive drugs towards the most potent and most dangerous drugs. Would crack even exist without prohibition? Cocaine was legal for decades and was always sold at a low strength until it was outlawed.
Unfortunately, the US IS a house of cards and so the last place libertarians want to be is in control. Think about it, the whole system is on the verge of collapse. There is 65 trillion dollars in debt, most of which won't be paid. Most of the states are on the edge of bankruptcy. When the system collapse, despite it being the result of decades of bad gov, whoever is in power when it collapses is going to take the blame for all of it. We need to be there to pick up the pieces AFTERWARDS.
DRUG USE would be a victimiless crime if they were legalized and taxed, I imagine more money would come in than taxing the casinos and gambling, lotteries, etc., So legalize, drug users benefit, crime is way down, and prostitution, the rehab places are paid for and in place paid by taxes on the dope. Simple, right? No, the jews make too much money doing it the illigal way, and payuing off the politicians to ensure their dishonesty and loyalty to their demonic causes.
There is a"system" in place. The police work for the system/tyranny.
When women are 'systematically' denigrated and cannot earn enough to feed/shelter their children they will give sex for money. If a girl in college cant meet her tuititon she will find a house & get a couple of days a week. If a young boy cant get work and his home is unlivable he WILL hit the street or bar for a quick buck or at best a "sugar daddy" These ones must be kept down in order for the system to keep control. LAWS.
@RjWeapon Good points. But the one thing that I wonder about legalising drugs is whether we'll have the same types of issues that we have with alcohol. After all alcohol kills more people than any other drug, and that has to be largely due to social acceptance and legality making people too lapse about the dangers. However, I do strongly believe that the more oppressive a society is the more likely they are to turn to unhealthy outlets to forget their troubles. This could explain drug use...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I have to say that although you make great points in this video I simply cannot agree that drug use is a victimless crime. Drug use generates crime, prostitution being one desperate act that can result from drug use. But even if you don't think prostitution is a crime, theft and mugging, the desperate act of an addict, is surely something that is not "victimless".
@RjWeapon well it all comes back to what you said about the priorities of police departments in your "are all police officers criminals" video. aren't you contradicting yourself when you state that the police hid in the LA riots and the columbine massacre but one of their main priorities is the public view of the police force? in liberal states where the riots and columbine took place, there would have been outrage at the killings of those poor "mentally disturbed" youth or "unarmed" civilians.
As a Iraq Vet I really love what you have to say I agree I wish I could pick you brain, WOW , any way liked the vids and hope for more you are right on on all of it in my opinion thanxs.
Now now you know the terrorist United States Government, and state government doesn't want you to think for yourself. What would happen if a whole bunch of people started thinking for themselves? Remember, terrorists fear only one thing, EXPOSURE.
We disagree. The constitution does protect us. The state IS SUPPOSED to uphold that where they are not but are forced to do so to get re-elected. However the fact that they don't care about anything more than re-election does give a good basis for your argument but the "State" is the last firewall between us and those that control entire nations. Thus DO NOT REVOLT. DO NOT ATTACK THAT WHICH PROTECTS YOU UNTIL IT NO LONGER PROTECTS YOU.
as far as afghanistan and iraq go, the department of defense has identified 4,398 american service members who have died since the start of the iraq war and 1,104 who have died as part of the afghan war and related operations. american fources have collectively taken the lives of over 3 million in both wars and related operations--and simillar statisctics can be brought to bare in relation to the vietnam war.
@415devonriley as far as afghanistan and iraq go, the department of defense has identified 4,398 american service members who have died since the start of the iraq war and 1,104 who have died as part of the afghan war and related operations. american forces have collectively taken the lives of over 3 million in both wars and related operations--and simillar statisctics can be brought to bare in relation to the vietnam war.
@415devonriley as far as afghanistan and iraq go, the department of defense has identified 4,398 american service members who have died since the start of the iraq war and 1,104 who have died as part of the afghan war and related operations. american fources have collectively taken the lives of over 3 million in both wars and related operations--and simillar statisctics can be brought to bare in relation to the vietnam war.
We are all victims in this, most don't see the subtle war on the fringe of our society, or that that fringe is growing and so is the police force that serves and protects corporate and state revenues.
Surely drugs are one of the major forces at work in keeping ordinary people dumbed down, and in a state of ignorant servitude? This video makes drugs sound like a basic human need, or at worst harmless luxury, rather than the body, mind and soul destroying junk that they are. If drugs disappeared off the face of the earth tomorrow, tyrannical governments around the world wouldn't last a month.
@RjWeapon Are you a Christian communist enviro terrorist? See how labeling people is counter productive, especially when you're pretty off base with those labels?
this is actually interesting because earlier you argued that the police handled the situation properly, and now you're saying that the police did in fact make mistakes, but not because they were scared, but because they weren't trained lol
and how would a private business maintain such a murderous monopoly on violence? this should be interesting....
haha, police hid for two hours before discovering that the shooters were suicidal, lol, even so, are you telling me police have never encountered suicidal shooters? police didn't have active shooter response tactics prior to columbine? lol, police didn't have crisis management operations prior to columbine? police didn't know how to coordinate between law enforcement officers prior to columbine? the whole idea of a police force is emergency management, lol
@RjWeapon You want honest critique of some of the weaker points of your vid, (which I think has some excellent points) or you want to just tell everyone how it is?
@RjWeapon If swat were cowards, then they would behave exactly the same way in this other high school would they not??? Im not saying there aren't coervice elements or the system as a whole doesn't need to be rethought (or even re-engineered), or that different crises units, handle situations differently (or even incompetently with fatal results), but to make a blanket statement that swat teams are cower during dangerous confrontation is just ..well naive.
Some interesting points, but the whole columbine thing is wrong. You cannot storm into any potential hostage situation as there is a high likelihood new victims will be shot as a result, as was the case of the school shootout in Denver, Sep 27. Nor do you have any method of determining who is the assailant and who is a victim in such a deliberately chaotic environment.
@NubianTribesman Probably not. Many of these flaws that he pointed out are inherent of the state. The libertarian wants the a limited government and wants it to remain this way, but the problem is it never will. Government will continue to grow if unchecked. A limited government relies on it's people to keep it limited, but this idea fails due to the apathy and ignorance of the populous.
@0HI0STATE18 Replace the word Libertarian and put Minarchist, Libertarian is much broader, between Minarchism and Anarchism. And a Limited State is not the same as a Limited Government, it depends on your definition but a DRO can be abusive too if its funded at the use of force at the margins, which under Anarchy would collapse instantly..
I don't see the difference between the gov't of this country and any that we are supposedly fighting for people's freedom sake. I was sexually assaulted, tased, maced and brutalized by police in wisconsin. No lawyer will help me...there is no other legal recourse, "Freedom" and "justice" in this country is a joke. I'm not an anarchist per se - but...well - thanks for spreading truth, RJ. Unfortunately, it makes too much sense to ignore.
heidi1535 1 month ago
ok dick head, i agree with everything except near the end. Militarly we didnt loose viet nam we lost politicaly. we won almost every battle, even tet was failure for the enemy but not acording to that dick head cronkite. we havent lost anything anywhere else. OUR GOVERNMENT endangers it's own soldiers with self destructive idiotic rules of enguament. if our soldiers were UNLEASHED we wouldnt have any problems but we have weak ass nonmilitary serving dirtbags in office.
howler505 2 months ago
@howler505
America has lost three wars since 1945, all three being fourth generation insurgencies. I'm not going to argue with you. See Martin van Creveld, Thomas Hammes, and John Robb
RjWeapon 2 months ago 6
@howler505 shut up lol with that silly flag waving crap.. anywhere in the world, theres no brain under helmet.. any soldier (armed murderer under any flag) is as good as he is equipped, brainwashed and organized.. stop fantasizing and wake up.. you are just people same as anywhere else.. and you behave as Brits during their imperial conquests.. they stood well until natives got armed with pointed sticks to defend themselves against British bullies and rapists. Shame on privatized government.
MarkoKraguljac 2 months ago
Graphics stolen from How it should of ended channel
Yanrogue 3 months ago
Superb bro, keep up the good work...
seanyzep 6 months ago
This is why the X-men was one of my favorite superhero series. It's never just about one person playing the hero and saving the day, it's a community of the gifted whose collective efforts are used to the greater good. The best part, no one is FORCED to stay. It's a voluntary community.
caspringer09 6 months ago 4
The cold reality is that the state intentionally perpetuates policies that lead to unemployment, homelessness, crime, substance abuse, maladies, division, and anxiety and insecurity among the general public. It does this to justify a need for social services, law enforcement, tax increases, authoritative control, and many other socialist policies and programs. This is how government protects itself.
JulesManson 7 months ago 4
True true true
wize11 9 months ago
@RjWeapon wow. i do stand corrected. but on the other hand, why bitch about the police? they do protect property and personal rights. so they go overboard sometimes. you should be so lucky to have US police, they are relatively ethical compared to other countries police. the civil rights system of the USA, enforced by the government, is one of the most liberating and pro citizen civil rights systems in the world. you have the type of liberty most humans would kill for. quit bitching.
chrispollock 10 months ago
@chrispollock The police can't protect your property when they take half of it at the point of a gun. The police can't protect your liberty when they take half of it at the point of a gun. You were born with every human right, but the government took half of it, and you're saying it's stupid to speak out against it?
Fuck that.
No problem has ever been solved by people who decided to shut up and stopped bitching. People who speak out get shit done.
Dirge987 9 months ago
@Dirge987 police cannot take my property, they can only enforce the terms of the contract regarding the sale of the house, which is only fair. police cannot simply take my liberty, they can only detain me legally if i am in violation of the law. my rights only exist within a framework of safety and stability. people who bitch about stuff that doesn't make sense are wasting their time.
chrispollock 9 months ago
@chrispollock "my rights only exist within a framework of safety and stability"
Wrong. If you were magically transported to another planet with no safety or society, you'd still have all your rights, your ability to speak, and act, and live.
"they can only detain me legally if i am in violation of the law"
But the law is based on circular reasoning: the law is valid because the law says it's valid. Think about that and you'll just go in circles forever. The law is therefore not valid.
Dirge987 9 months ago
@Dirge987 if i am among 100 other people, and i have no codified right to speak without protection of the law, i can be killed. at least with codified law saying i am protected, i stand a greater chance of living.
law is valid because people vote to pass laws, not because the "law" has anything to say about it. without voters saying so, laws would have no meaning or meaningful enforcement.
chrispollock 8 months ago
@chrispollock Laws are not valid because a group of people vote for them, the last time I checked an appeal to popularity was a logical fallacy. If a group of people make a law that says a racial minority should be beaten to death, by your definition the law is valid. If a group of people make a law that women can and should be raped, then by your definition the law is valid. If the validity of a law comes from the people simply deciding it is, then it is NOT logically valid.
Dirge987 8 months ago
@chrispollock "they can only enforce the terms of the contract regarding the sale of the house, which is only fair"
But you never explicitly consented to their contract" You didn't choose to be born in a particular geographical location, which the government has a self-granted monopoly over. You also cannot reject the contract without the government's permission. And if you do reject their contract, you must accept a different contract. Not to mention every contract is consented to under duress
Dirge987 9 months ago
@Dirge987 you can leave a geographical area, you can reject signing the contract, you can rent apartments for the rest of your life. more anarchist utopian rantings.
chrispollock 8 months ago
@chrispollock "people who bitch about stuff that doesn't make sense are wasting their time"
People bitch because the laws and government don't make sense, and they have no logical authority if you really examined their ex post facto justifications.
However, aren't you just bitching about people bitching? That's a self-contradicting statement. If people are invalid because they bitch, then your argument against them is also invalid.
Dirge987 9 months ago
@Dirge987 pointing out the silliness of your claims is not a waste of time. laws do make sense for the most part, which involve property laws, anti violence laws, anti theft laws etc. your assumption that the government or police can act unilaterally or arbitrarily against citizens without due process demonstrates a lack of understanding on your part.
chrispollock 9 months ago
@chrispollock "laws do make sense for the most part, which involve property laws"
The laws give themselves clearance to violate the property of others, and are therefore contradictory and self-invalidating.
"anti violence laws"
Violence is used to enforce the laws, therefore also making them contradictory and self-invalidating.
"anti theft laws etc"
The biggest thief is the government itself, which takes a person's resources without consent, and with the threat of violence.
Dirge987 9 months ago
@Dirge987 incorrect. in the usa, for example, you have strong laws that defend homeowners from unlawful search and seizure. and if such things are done, you have legal recourse, which is less than what you'd find in less law based society. yes violence is force. if laws need to be enforced against those who would rob, rape and murder, then there's no problem there. govt. taxation isn't theft, taking from another purely to ingratiate yourself is theft
chrispollock 8 months ago
@chrispollock "govt. taxation isn't theft, taking from another purely to ingratiate yourself is theft"
Then by your own definition the government is a thief. Good job.
Dirge987 8 months ago
@Dirge987 oh go back to your college philosophy class, mr. logician. meanwhile, in the real world, our tax money provides a consistent level of baseline support for all manner of everyday things we take for granted. is it coercion. sure. is it a small price to pay. yes.
chrispollock 8 months ago
@chrispollock "oh go back to your college philosophy class, mr. logician."
Lol you started the conversation with me, not the other way around.
"our tax money provides a consistent level of baseline support for all manner of everyday things we take for granted"
Provided by a monopoly with the sole right to initiate violence. Oh how wonderful.
"is it coercion. sure. is it a small price to pay. yes."
So first you say it's not theft, now you say it is, but now it's okay. Special pleading much?
Dirge987 8 months ago
@Dirge987 in a market economy, the state does not own a monopoly on services paid for by taxes. if you don't like the water system, you can buy bottled water from the market, if you don't like the a govt. run electrical company, you can buy a generator or install solar panels. if you don't like govt. clinics, you can pay for your own doctor. again, if you're going to state vague principles, go back to college. taxation is more of a required cost for living in a stable nation, not theft.
chrispollock 8 months ago
@chrispollock
If someone takes you money without your consent and buys you a burger with it, it's still theft.
If someone takes you money without your consent and donates it to a charity, it's still theft.
If someone takes you money without your consent and uses it for whatever they want, it's still theft.
You're obviously missing the gun in the room. An entity has the special privilege to use violence on whoever it wants with impunity, and you think it's going to play nice? Please.
Dirge987 8 months ago
@chrispollock I mean you can dress up the government in whatever pretty magical dress you want, but at the end of the day when you get into the nitty gritty of what it does, it's still force, and it's still theft. It doesn't matter where the money goes to, or who does it; the fact that an entity is taking the money from another entity without consent through violence makes it theft.
Dirge987 8 months ago 2
@Dirge987 if being required to chip in to support the basic services of the place in which you have the privilege of living, and if you have the freedom to leave that place at any time, then it isn't coercion. bye
chrispollock 8 months ago
@chrispollock Lol, if having a gun pointed at your head and being forced to pay, no actually have your things taken without your consent to an entity that uses your money however it pleases on things you don't want or use is the kind of place you want to live in, fine, just keep me out of it. Need I remind you that you need the government's permission to leave, and if you do leave, then you can only join another government. Leaving a plantation for another plantation isn't freedom dumbass.
Dirge987 8 months ago
@chrispollock And I find the "logic" or more accurately the false dichotomy of "take it or leave it" as a justification for the government laughably retarded. Hey man, if I move next to you and throw garbage into your lawn, you can just take it or leave it, right? If your society allows for slavery, you can just take it or leave it, right? If women or minorities have no rights in your society, you can take it or leave it. Lol, that's no even an argument, that's just half-thought justification.
Dirge987 8 months ago
@chrispollock
But we still paid for all the goods and services the government provided.
siggensax 8 months ago
@chrispollock "your assumption that the government or police can act unilaterally or arbitrarily against citizens without due process demonstrates a lack of understanding on your part."
And you assume that the government is valid, but where do they get the authority to do such acts? If you actually look at the "justifications", they are all fallacious:
Democracy - appeal to popularity (not valid)
Republic - circular reasoning (not valid)
Oligarchy/monarchy - special pleading (not valid)
Dirge987 9 months ago
@Dirge987 republic and capitalism are the best combo we have for prosperity and freedom thus far discovered. all utopian rantings are invalid and lead to tyranny and misery.
chrispollock 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@chrispollock "all utopian rantings are invalid and lead to tyranny and misery"
Simply calling things invalid doesn't invalidate them. Show it with logic.
Dirge987 9 months ago
@chrispollock Your 'STFU and drink the Kool Aid' mentality is invalid, and leads to tyranny and misery. Could you represent a Fascist Totalitarian any more completely? Any thought process outside your narrow minded belief that everything is fine will lead to misery? That's fear mongering. Invalid? Oh, thanks! The fascist fear mongering totalitarian has deemed alternative thought 'utopian and invalid'. Prosperity and freedom. What's the National Debt? How many in Prison? Kool Aid?
Brajabu74 8 months ago
@Brajabu74 i believe in republic and capitalism, not fascism. everything IS fine compared with the alternative (communism, theocracy, etc.) if by narrow minded belief you mean a strongly held opinion. utopian thought is invalid! check out the 20th century for examples of movements that move away from market systems into command economies for some "higher value". you see oppression follow. yes all the jobs created by all the freely earned wealth. economic mobility for producers. yes freedom!
chrispollock 8 months ago
@chrispollock Do you understand what has been transpiring since 9/11, and how little it has to do with anti-terrorism? 'So they go overboard sometimes' Yeah, now they have high powered automatic rifles. Do FBI agents writing their own search warrants sound 'pro citizen'. How? Expansion of FISA? No knock warrants? Criminalizing speech? Rendition? Legalized assassination? Roaming wire taps? Suspension of Posse Comitatus? Bailouts? No fly lists (how many?!)? This is freedom? You're a TOOL!
Brajabu74 8 months ago
*yawn* well now that you're done with bitching about the evils of police and government, you can go back to doing nothing but listening to chomsky and smoking a bowl.
chrispollock 10 months ago
its alot safer to arrest prostitutes vs. violent criminals.........
same with stoners...."put the bong down slowly!!! or i'll shoot!!!!
ProthoPectore 1 year ago 2
Response time? wtf is that? Cops don't show unless its drug related or murder. Assaults and domestic violence gets little to no response at all in Clayton County GA! Worst police department ever. And don't drive the speed limit in a neighborhood you are "not suppose to be in". You'll never get home fucking with these cops. Didn't know blacks couldn't drive by predominately white subdivisions at 9pm until I moved into said subdivision.
raventakayama 1 year ago
right on
jackbdead 1 year ago
I totally agree. However, on the Columbine thing I sorta felt bad for those kids. I think that they were driven insane by the system and reacted in the complete wrong way. Anyway, yes we need to oust these corporates and their goons/the police. They do absolutely no good. They "crack down" on victimless crimes and hide when real things are going on. They're useless. Their system is set up to oppress people in every single way imaginable. Let's get rid of it, they need us not vice versa.
Death2AllWhoOppose 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watched it, loved it....;-)
unlistedoo7 1 year ago
@RjWeapon You show another problem with drugs here. Nobody would pay $25 for a beer because it takes too many to get drunk, so instead they drink hard liqueur. The same exact thing happens with drugs and the prohibition, the high costs and the terrible punishments by the law tend to drive drugs towards the most potent and most dangerous drugs. Would crack even exist without prohibition? Cocaine was legal for decades and was always sold at a low strength until it was outlawed.
christo930 1 year ago
Unfortunately, the US IS a house of cards and so the last place libertarians want to be is in control. Think about it, the whole system is on the verge of collapse. There is 65 trillion dollars in debt, most of which won't be paid. Most of the states are on the edge of bankruptcy. When the system collapse, despite it being the result of decades of bad gov, whoever is in power when it collapses is going to take the blame for all of it. We need to be there to pick up the pieces AFTERWARDS.
christo930 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I HATE cops!
Visit my website, "Say no to cops!" The link is in my profile. FUCK THE SYSTEM!
poetswolf1985 1 year ago
DRUG USE would be a victimiless crime if they were legalized and taxed, I imagine more money would come in than taxing the casinos and gambling, lotteries, etc., So legalize, drug users benefit, crime is way down, and prostitution, the rehab places are paid for and in place paid by taxes on the dope. Simple, right? No, the jews make too much money doing it the illigal way, and payuing off the politicians to ensure their dishonesty and loyalty to their demonic causes.
germaniajim 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@germaniajim
"Drug use would be a victimiless crime if they were legalized and taxed"
What about the victim of the taxation?
continuityofliberty 1 year ago
There is a"system" in place. The police work for the system/tyranny.
When women are 'systematically' denigrated and cannot earn enough to feed/shelter their children they will give sex for money. If a girl in college cant meet her tuititon she will find a house & get a couple of days a week. If a young boy cant get work and his home is unlivable he WILL hit the street or bar for a quick buck or at best a "sugar daddy" These ones must be kept down in order for the system to keep control. LAWS.
sophiah88 1 year ago
@RjWeapon Good points. But the one thing that I wonder about legalising drugs is whether we'll have the same types of issues that we have with alcohol. After all alcohol kills more people than any other drug, and that has to be largely due to social acceptance and legality making people too lapse about the dangers. However, I do strongly believe that the more oppressive a society is the more likely they are to turn to unhealthy outlets to forget their troubles. This could explain drug use...
RockingMrE 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I have to say that although you make great points in this video I simply cannot agree that drug use is a victimless crime. Drug use generates crime, prostitution being one desperate act that can result from drug use. But even if you don't think prostitution is a crime, theft and mugging, the desperate act of an addict, is surely something that is not "victimless".
RockingMrE 1 year ago
@RockingMrE "Drug use generates crime"
lol, backwards logic is backwards
EpicDude86 10 months ago
I've got to ask you how you made this vid and great job by the way!
adriansrfr 1 year ago
So I guess the only question I can think of is... What are you going to do about it?
synchangel 1 year ago
@synchangel, Libertarianism and/or Agorism
adriansrfr 1 year ago
Hitting the nail on the head. Superhero in a fat suit
AmericanRefoundation 1 year ago
I've downloaded all these into mp3 format.
Now this is something to intellectualize about, not bullshit like 2012 or global warming.
IWantMyVisionBack 1 year ago
awesome video
JewLoco 1 year ago
We've spent the morning going through your videos.
Very good work, all the way around.
Oceanfloats 1 year ago
you fucking rock, Your videos should have millions of views, not the other shit out there.
your helping the world wake up.
MikhailLifirenko 1 year ago
The State is like a superhero in a fat suit!
Classic!
HeronimousPhunk 1 year ago
@RjWeapon well it all comes back to what you said about the priorities of police departments in your "are all police officers criminals" video. aren't you contradicting yourself when you state that the police hid in the LA riots and the columbine massacre but one of their main priorities is the public view of the police force? in liberal states where the riots and columbine took place, there would have been outrage at the killings of those poor "mentally disturbed" youth or "unarmed" civilians.
madmarine2010 1 year ago
As a Iraq Vet I really love what you have to say I agree I wish I could pick you brain, WOW , any way liked the vids and hope for more you are right on on all of it in my opinion thanxs.
TURNERSARMY 1 year ago
Now now you know the terrorist United States Government, and state government doesn't want you to think for yourself. What would happen if a whole bunch of people started thinking for themselves? Remember, terrorists fear only one thing, EXPOSURE.
depleteduraniumiswmd 1 year ago
We disagree. The constitution does protect us. The state IS SUPPOSED to uphold that where they are not but are forced to do so to get re-elected. However the fact that they don't care about anything more than re-election does give a good basis for your argument but the "State" is the last firewall between us and those that control entire nations. Thus DO NOT REVOLT. DO NOT ATTACK THAT WHICH PROTECTS YOU UNTIL IT NO LONGER PROTECTS YOU.
KennedyFilmsKWWFP 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
as far as afghanistan and iraq go, the department of defense has identified 4,398 american service members who have died since the start of the iraq war and 1,104 who have died as part of the afghan war and related operations. american fources have collectively taken the lives of over 3 million in both wars and related operations--and simillar statisctics can be brought to bare in relation to the vietnam war.
415devonriley 1 year ago
Comment removed
415devonriley 1 year ago
Comment removed
415devonriley 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@415devonriley as far as afghanistan and iraq go, the department of defense has identified 4,398 american service members who have died since the start of the iraq war and 1,104 who have died as part of the afghan war and related operations. american forces have collectively taken the lives of over 3 million in both wars and related operations--and simillar statisctics can be brought to bare in relation to the vietnam war.
415devonriley 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@415devonriley as far as afghanistan and iraq go, the department of defense has identified 4,398 american service members who have died since the start of the iraq war and 1,104 who have died as part of the afghan war and related operations. american fources have collectively taken the lives of over 3 million in both wars and related operations--and simillar statisctics can be brought to bare in relation to the vietnam war.
415devonriley 1 year ago
Great, thought-inspiring video - thanks.
goldieken 1 year ago 11
M8 this is an amazing video, I wish I thought of this first LoL. I appreciate your insight. Keep up the good work.
infinitesimotel 1 year ago
We are all victims in this, most don't see the subtle war on the fringe of our society, or that that fringe is growing and so is the police force that serves and protects corporate and state revenues.
mcguirethomas8 1 year ago
@1:25 this shows moral hypocrisy.
Yes enocomic democrisy your wallet gives power to your representation.
Excellent points.
BrutusCass 1 year ago
So true.
As this one demotivational poster once said:
"Rule of Law: Armed robbery, negligent homicide, assault, and torture lead to order when authorized by the right government."
Surhotchaperchlorome 1 year ago
Surely drugs are one of the major forces at work in keeping ordinary people dumbed down, and in a state of ignorant servitude? This video makes drugs sound like a basic human need, or at worst harmless luxury, rather than the body, mind and soul destroying junk that they are. If drugs disappeared off the face of the earth tomorrow, tyrannical governments around the world wouldn't last a month.
MarcC89 1 year ago
@RjWeapon Are you a Christian communist enviro terrorist? See how labeling people is counter productive, especially when you're pretty off base with those labels?
rbairos1 1 year ago
I'm not allowed to judge the police state but the police state can judge me? Go away.
RjWeapon 1 year ago 35
Comment removed
realhiphop087 9 months ago
Incredible video!
jessesainthimmel 1 year ago
this is actually interesting because earlier you argued that the police handled the situation properly, and now you're saying that the police did in fact make mistakes, but not because they were scared, but because they weren't trained lol
and how would a private business maintain such a murderous monopoly on violence? this should be interesting....
nosleepnation 1 year ago
haha, police hid for two hours before discovering that the shooters were suicidal, lol, even so, are you telling me police have never encountered suicidal shooters? police didn't have active shooter response tactics prior to columbine? lol, police didn't have crisis management operations prior to columbine? police didn't know how to coordinate between law enforcement officers prior to columbine? the whole idea of a police force is emergency management, lol
nosleepnation 1 year ago
@nosleepnation Yes. Im pretty sure Columbine was a game changer in that town.
Don't confuse the last 11 years with the last 40.
rbairos1 1 year ago
its ok, but a blanket statement would be saying "All" police are violent and murderous individuals
nosleepnation 1 year ago
@RjWeapon You want honest critique of some of the weaker points of your vid, (which I think has some excellent points) or you want to just tell everyone how it is?
rbairos1 1 year ago
You're just giving me your opinion... and I disagree, what do you want from me?
RjWeapon 1 year ago
Do you actually know any bomb techs, or tactical officers, or the training they receive, or the objectives they follow in crisis situations?
rbairos1 1 year ago
@RjWeapon If swat were cowards, then they would behave exactly the same way in this other high school would they not??? Im not saying there aren't coervice elements or the system as a whole doesn't need to be rethought (or even re-engineered), or that different crises units, handle situations differently (or even incompetently with fatal results), but to make a blanket statement that swat teams are cower during dangerous confrontation is just ..well naive.
rbairos1 1 year ago
Go for it
RjWeapon 1 year ago 4
You took note of a study.
Can you please cite the source/name of it so people can look into it?
Surhotchaperchlorome 1 year ago
Some interesting points, but the whole columbine thing is wrong. You cannot storm into any potential hostage situation as there is a high likelihood new victims will be shot as a result, as was the case of the school shootout in Denver, Sep 27. Nor do you have any method of determining who is the assailant and who is a victim in such a deliberately chaotic environment.
rbairos1 1 year ago
Fucking well done man. Keep speaking truth to power!
kolomgorov 1 year ago
Awesome video! Glad to know you exist now, so thanks to InTheEndIWasRight for mirroring!
gf1605 1 year ago
This is the best video I've seen in a while. I'd like to mirror this too. People need to see this.
GuardofLiberty 1 year ago
I really like your videos. They are very well done, but you need to cite your sources. I found your channel through InTheEndIWasRight.
DeraJa 1 year ago
links?
DeraJa 1 year ago
Awesome man!
tpsisokayiguess 1 year ago
great analysis!
but couldnt you fix the problems of government now that youve identified the problems rather than getting rid of it?
at least thats how I feel.
NubianTribesman 1 year ago
@NubianTribesman Probably not. Many of these flaws that he pointed out are inherent of the state. The libertarian wants the a limited government and wants it to remain this way, but the problem is it never will. Government will continue to grow if unchecked. A limited government relies on it's people to keep it limited, but this idea fails due to the apathy and ignorance of the populous.
0HI0STATE18 1 year ago
@0HI0STATE18 Replace the word Libertarian and put Minarchist, Libertarian is much broader, between Minarchism and Anarchism. And a Limited State is not the same as a Limited Government, it depends on your definition but a DRO can be abusive too if its funded at the use of force at the margins, which under Anarchy would collapse instantly..
BIackOp 1 year ago
why don't you post your videos on fringe?
Prometheusforliberty 1 year ago
great video!
TheBigHo111 1 year ago
Ya, Government sucks doesn't it.
Apptendo 1 year ago
Rj you made my day
CavsHooligan 1 year ago
I like it!
1stSuperChannel 1 year ago
May I mirror this on my page tomorrow or so? I'll for sure give yall the credit for it and link ya, its a great video.
InTheEndIWasRight 1 year ago
@InTheEndIWasRight
Of course, thanks
RjWeapon 1 year ago
@RjWeapon Sweet, thanks man. It'll probably be up tomorrow sometime. Hope yall get some more subs from it.
InTheEndIWasRight 1 year ago
Great video.
return135 1 year ago
"The state is not protecting you. It's protecting itself from you."
That's a quote to remember.
ijust1 1 year ago 2