Thats all good and well, but explain the picture we all saw of the EXIT HOLE!!! This video proves NOTHING except that a Jet DID NOT crash into the Pentagon, so for that, I thank you! It was a MISSILE Ladies and Gentleman! Our Gov't has been lying to us from Day 1 and covering it up, and doing a pretty bad jib at it I might add. They release a 4 second EDITED video of a blurr hitting the pentagon yet SEIZING and storing away 50 other Clear camera angels....whatever !
Mmmm, September 10 Pentagon cannot account for over a trillion dollars, September 11 the 'airplane' (cruise missile) hits the Pentagon where all the records are kept, just a coincidence? I think not
@green834721 Yah it really amazed me what a bunch of Dumbasses the American Public truly are. I mean if the Govt can cover this crap up, they can do just about anything!
also if you look at the pictures of the hole in the pentagon , you can clearly see offices in the impact zone , paperwork , wooden furniture ect completely unburnt without any charring . yet apparently the very same jet fuel fire at wtc generated enough heat to melt steel and cause catastrophic structure failure causing the buildings to collapse . its embarresing what the us government can so blatently make its citezens believe
you saw a video of how they explained it ? well fuck me ! i saw one of how they explained a single bullet killed jfk made a right turn did a few fucking zig zags and found someone else . its the fucking pentagon !! thousands of survailance cameras ,, they'd see a mouse fart but cant seem to find footage of a fucking plane dropping by .. also the turbine they photographed ,, rolles royce said it resembeled nothing they had ever manufactured , and was too small for a plane , more that of a missile
OK.If a large plane did hit then why has not one single video of the plane before impact ever been released in the many years since 9-11,other than the one grainy image? You cant tell me that out of all of the many cameras in and around the Pentagon,not one of them caught this. If there is no cover up (and I'm on the fence about that) then why no clear images of the impact? You cant believe that this location only had one camera!
The thing is we never EVER saw a big airplane crash into anything at full speed...All the plane accidents envolved the attempt of stopping the plane or reducing its speed as much as possible. In 9/11 they came at full speed and ALL the cameras which normal citizens had were not able to record in HD image...The first HD image ever transmitted to the world was in World Soccer Cup 2002 by the Japonese- korean TVs - Some of the conspirancy theories were made based on the fact of weird footages.
The thing is we never EVER saw a big airplane crash into anything at full speed...All the plane accidents envolved the attempt of stopping the plane or reducing its speed as much as possible. In 9/11 they came at full speed and ALL the cameras which normal citizens had were not able to record in HD image...The first HD image ever transmitted to the world was in World Soccer Cup 2002 by the Japonese- korean TVs - Some of the conspirancy theories were made based on the fact of weird footages.
Here's the only proof you need. The plane took off from the air port with its people. The plane and people didn't reach their destination. Anyone that thinks otherwise doesn't deserve to live.
That's the only proof we need? A fake passenger log assigned to a fake flight? Wow, you are a fucking lemming. You will kill yourself long before I will, most likely by stepping off a cliff because the US Government told you it was safe.
@dropintospace How was it fake? Families lost their loved ones who boarded a plane. Money was lost for destroying a plane. You fucking dumb ass should realize your the very small minority of idiots that think the whole world is a cover up. Is there any towers there anymore? Are the people that walked with us that was involved here anymore? You should fucking be killed.
@Governm3nt he mere fact all video footage from all 86 Pentagon cameras have not been released means there is a cover-up, meaning what we are told is a fucking lie.
Support a FALSE FLAG TERRORISM PROHIBITION Act. If you don't, it's clear you are in the false flag terrorism business; and if so, lite yourself on fire and see what those 3000 people felt like when your USGov murdered them on 9/11.
@Governm3nt ... wow... hahha.. what are you like 9?..its 2012 and u still believe the government on this bullshit... were u even born when it happend?
OMG !! I see everything so clearly Shown here ! Only a human with the 10th of a monkkee brain would argue these Clearly Shown Facts. A. The Wreckage B. The Fuel Explosion Mark Left Behind = No Missile. C. The 757 Captured on Film. D. 130+ Witnesses. E. The Light Poles. F. The Internal Wreckage. G. No Blast Evidence on Lawn or Inside Pent. H. The Phone Calls on Board. I. The Attempts from Terror Sympathizers to Slander Victims last Reports. J. Zero Evidence to Prove Otherwise.
@Spindry96 lol everyone here is making an uneducated guess, but it doesn't take a genius to see that this video shows that indeed a plane cannot go thru even one concrete wall let alone 3.
I do wonder if there are people who still believe what the government has created to deceive the US and the world, They didn't have a problem showing "evidence" of who and how this was planned, but can not show the various security tapes from the pentagon, nearby businesses, etc...?? the proof is in the hole the "object" that hit the pentagon left, where are the wing segments, wouldn't they of left at the least a scratch on the sides of the hole that was created at impact?
Keep trying, it amazing how much Bullshit you guys come up with haha US government fail.
The most heavily protected airspace in the world got breached without one missile going off. All those missile launchers around the pentagon what did the Defence department have a change of heart on military spending that day?
the guy who crashed the plane at the pentagon must of been a fucking good pilot then, not a scratch on the front lawn!!!!!!!!!!!!! he missed the streetlights hit near enough bang on ground level whislst travelling between 300-500 mph/kph so fast all the drivers by missed him and he managed to disintergrate a 200tonne plane and 4x 3 tonne jet engines . for those that dont understand sarcasm here is an example.
@TheTruthHurtsYup ok so i didnt count the streetlamps my apologies but to actually believe a plane hit it is friggin rediculous im not one for conspirises but i know what my eyes tell me.
The wings intact all of the way through no fireball explosion
The nose disintegrated completely, while the supposed nose poked a whole through the opposite wall of the Pentagon which is not constructed of the same reinforced material as reactor walls
Why can we clearly see a small jet from start to finish here, but not the larger one striking the Pentagon?
Why edit out the video showing close up of damage and debris did the black-box vaporize as well?
@DarfurDeng Cool .... apples and oranges. This demonstrates the laws of motion perfectly. The effect is different at an oblique angle. In every collision there is an equal and opposite force on both objects. The same force the plane is delivering to the wall here the wall is delivering to the plane. The energy is conserved. The planes energy is in its velocity and mass. As we see the energy transferred we see a loss in velocity and mass. No Boeing size hole at the Pentagon
How can a vaporised plane go through all the walls in the pentagon,i mean when exactly did it vaporize,after it went through the last wall?.The US gov are full of shit the only hijackers that day were Bush and Cheny who hijacked the US constitution
START THE REVOLUTION NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IM IN THE ARMY AND I CANT STAND THE WAY THIS GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN GOING FOR SO LONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AMERICAS MILITIA YOU HAVE MY SWORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL FIGHT FOR THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!! I AM A PATRIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THAT WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE OF THESE ENDS, IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO ALTER OR ABOLISH IT, AND INSTITUTE A NEW GOVERNMENT - DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
I have seen, like many of us, several plane disaster videos. I DON'T CLAIM ANYTHING, just wondering, how only on 9/11 attacks planes disappeared almost totally but on the other vids there was tons of parts of the wreckage on the other crashes. The difference just makes me wondering.
Didn't ya hear? They've changed their story. Now they're saying the plane DIDN'T "vaporize" & they've put some nice disinformation errr... I mean pictures online to prove it. I'm guessing that's what this is too. lol,It looks like sand. Ahhh, "9/11 physics"
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
that a concrete wall of at least 20 feet long. The pentagon does not have that kind of walls and have a lot of windows. And, where are the wings damage in the pentagon???
@josemanuel599 They do have a radiation wall similar to this in the "C" barrier of the pentagon. But if you look at the photographs after the "plane" hit there is a small hole (about 10 ft wide and maybe 10-15ft high) in the C barrier of the pentagon. A plane couldn't have crashed through 2 walls, hit the radiation barrier then disintegrate. The laws of physics just don't allow that. plus the nose of the plane would have been DESTROYED after going through the first wall.
Ha !! what a load of shit !!... No matter what proof you got of a plane hitting the pentagon, People need to see the real cam footage from all the camera's surrounding the building, And why is it that witnesses from the wtc crashes never saw or heard planes till they saw the news footages ??
@whaqd76 You crazies believe your conspiracy theories with the same fervency as a devout theist. I've seen a complilation of home footage of the planes hitting the towers. Oh, lemme guess, they are government agents! Rather than dispute facts that you are too mindblind to look up yourself, let me ask you something: How can our government be so incompetent in every other facet of governing, but manage to pull this off? Why has noone on their death bed spoke the truth about this from conscience?
@FastUnit4 But where are the wing marks ? In almost all of the photos there is only a large hole .there would be wing marks on the left and right side of the wall but there isnt any at all . It just doesnt add up to a plane that large not leaving wing marks . go look at the pictures where it shows the hole only just after the inpact . Its just a large holeand nothing else at all .
Nice Pics but more interesting were pictures of what you can not see in the cloud. However, the wall is built solid components such as landing gear or engine shafts do not break down into dust.
Ok dipshits there was a fucking plane that crashed into the fucking Pentagon. My uncle was a first responder and he went inside. I trust him not some nerd in Asia. So why dont you shut the fuck up and get a life
@ClassicCPvideos BS! No one went inside until long after the fire was out and the building was declared safe to enter. Who's in Asia?? What planet are you on? LOL As far as getting a life...thanks! Got one and it doesn't include being brain fucked by the mass media and government.
@crapatev "Carol Vorderman - part of the NWO" - For sure. The lizards went back in time to make sure. It's either "lizards" or"men in white coats" for some people
COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal[2], projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political organizations.
COINTELPRO tactics included discrediting targets through psychological warfare, planting false reports in the media, smearing through forged letters, harassment, wrongful imprisonment, and extralegal violence !!
Release all the confiscated security videos of businesses neighboring the pentagon. Let us see those videos and decide. Really tough to believe a plane crashed into pentagon, when theyre hiding all the videos. Its been over 10 years. Release or remain guilty!
so why not release ALL the tapes of the pentagon on 9/11 so we can see the plane disappearing into dust. it would stop all the controversy, right? why are they hiding the tapes. me thinks they have something they want to keep to themselves.
stfu how is this proof. for starters the planes a different size. whats its hitting his a different size AND it mentions to tips of the wings escape... there were no wings at the pentagon so this just explains a JET (not a plane) going at 500mph cnt even go straight thru a building wall with out leaving evidence of its wings. 911 pentagon however there is no video of the plane and no wings.... wake the FCK UP
@kdreamland and just like someone already said..... if what happened in this video is true... how did the plane that completely smashes on impact, go through another 2/3 walls? ALSO theres a video of a report made minutes after the pentagon was hit and the reporter says there are no wings or any plane pieces. ITS A CRIME SCENE, they wouldn't pick up the wings leave everything else and drive away. there were no wings. MY OPINION no plane. and this video is far from proof. READ 9/11 10 years later
that isnt proof. wow. A 747 and a fighter jet have very different properties AND even if this would be true of a 747 (it wouldnt) crashing into pure concrete (it didn't, there were windows) you're committing the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent:
If a plane hit the pentagon, there would be no trace of a plane
@rono8582 ...So lemme get this straight, this is your version of physics: The plane either disintegrates on the spot as soon as it hits the wall causing no further damage to the structure, or remains intact in spite of slamming into a concrete building at several hundred miles per hour?
@Ghisguth it is a rhetorical statement because the 2 official stories that the pentagon delivered were that the plane "dissolved on impact and because of the fuel" but at the same time, it visibly penetrated a few walls and went several meters IN to the building.
What Proof? It atomised! What happened to its 2 ton engine then? or flight 77's two engines? - Did they atomise as well?? Its not prood it's BULLSHIT!
@tubemonks why do they need to make vidos like this when 1000 cameras are recording the pentagon 24 hours a day :) Because it was not a plane that hit it !!
@Headshothorror4488 Go and find the video which actually points out flight 77 in an outline and shows blurred but obvious blue and red markings. There are at least 2 vids that are similar. Also amongst the confusion a lot of people saw a lot of things, including those who actually described flight 77 to those who claimed to have seen ufo's, holograms, giant birds, and george bush riding a phoenix. So what's your point ?????????
A 757 has a wing span of 125 ft. and two 9.5 thousand pound engines which sit 70ft behind the cockpit. Quite different from this compact jet smashing into nuclear protection designed walls.
@FragFestFTW aye, let alone the fact that the "plane" had to be bolted to a platform, because they understood the simple fact that something going that speed, so close to the ground is scientifically impossible, but only a logical person would know that, and us americans are paid for our ignorance more than our honesty.
Unfortunately everyone here is correct, that is not a 757. Furthermore even this "experiment" show/proves that the wings do not fold backwards as stated by Mike Walter in his explanation of the events . The video clearly show the wings slicing through the concrete walls. Thus the pentagon would have a hole in it that follows the contours of a plane (engines included). This is a poor attempt by a patriotic American. I wish this video proved what you believe, but the evidence shows otherwise.
@ostofe16 The wings themselves are not shown going through the wall. The tips of them are sheered off and continue moving forward outside the dimensions of the concrete barrier. There was nothing on the outside edges to stop them. The rest of the plane disintegrated upon impact.
all somebody needs to do is show me just 1 airplane body part (a wing section, some fuselage, a tail section etc..) that was removed from the pentagon? or even 1 video of an actual airliner crashing into it?? people wake up!...I hate stuoid sheep
well... first problem, this is a small plane smashing into several foot thick concrete designed to contain a nuclear reactor, at ground level - with a ground level vector... versus a jumbo jet cashing at a steep downward angle into a glorified business office.
@spamsam15 hello, the walls of the pentagon are 18" thick, consisting of highly substantial steel and concrete reinforcement modified mix, as is shown on the video the aircraft atomized and didn't go through the wall, even though it is a far thicker block and hypothesizing it actually travelled all the way through, the pieces surviving the original impact could not possibly go through another five walls built exactly the same way leaving a ten foot perfectly round, THIS COULD, ''BUNKER BUSTER ''
how can a plane crash into such a low rise building without grazing or destroying the poles in front of the part of the building where the 'plane crashed'
such a clean pilot that he didn't even strike down one pole while flying a 100 feet wide plane at almost ground level???
The plane that"hit the pentagon" was a 3 engine passenger jet, not a tiny fighter from Vietnam. Should have been 2 holes from the engines, not one big gaping hole. The laws of physics were apparently suspended on September 11th.
@krelbar It is. This wall in the video is specially designed for nuclear plants and would withstand small aircraft crashing into it. The walls of the Pentagon were not reinforced to withstand the impact of a passenger plane.
@chaosproduction the portion of the Pentagon that was hit had recently been renovated to withstand attack. I'm not saying that they were as strong as in this video, as whatever hit the pentagon did go through the wall. I just remembered that it had been coincidentally renovated just prior to 9/11.
@Sterlacea Actually those renovations were not designed to withstand aircraft impact, but this did help in decreasing the amount of casulities that could of been. It was because of these renovations that the impact site of the Pentagon didn't collapse sooner.
@Sterlacea sorry mate, but the part of the building (housing the ONI and its accounts dept), was the only section awaiting renovation, dont that beat all. i mean the office which the previous day anounce it couldnt account for 2.3 TRILLION dollars, were did it all go?... awe, lost all the docs in the fire darn it!!!!!!!, I FOUND IT IN MY BACK POCKET, IT WAS ALL THERE HONEST.........JUST CANT GET THE RECEIPTS MAN !!!!, that beats all coincidences on a day of the mother of all coincidences.
John Townes, a Reno pilot, said the plane didn't sound right moments before the crash.
"It wasn't quite vertical. It was at a very slight angle and because of that I think it probably saved a lot of people," he said. "Normally when you see an air crash, you see recognizable wreckage. There was nothing, just little bits of metal."
Also, the crater was only 8 feet wide.
Guess that must have been a missile in Nevada as well..
John Townes, a Reno pilot, said the plane didn't sound right moments before the crash.
"It wasn't quite vertical. It was at a very slight angle and because of that I think it probably saved a lot of people," he said. "Normally when you see an air crash, you see recognizable wreckage. There was nothing, just little bits of metal."
Also, the crater was only 8 feet wide.
Guess that must have been a missile in Nevada as well..
A 757 CAN'T do 500 mph at sea level top speed is only 360mph under 8000ft. If it did try to come in at a high speed it would ricashae upward because of air turbulence & miss the target. The whole issue is just a fairytale, it wasn't a plane, it was just a BIG a lie.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it“…Joseph Goebbels
Anyone who doesn't support a new 9/11 investigation is afraid of either knowing or revealing the truth.
@Lemonskill77 I totally agree with you. Show me irrefutable proof and I'll apologize as well and shut the Hell up. P.S. I'm a United States citizen, live in Washington state, and am NOT a conspiracy enthusiast. Just a guy that questions some of what I have seen and find it very difficult to believe what "THEY" are telling us what we should believe.
@Killer0fTheSun the reason videos have not been released is because it would cause unnecessary grief to the families... which quite frankly i agree with... i dont want to watch more videos of people being murdered.
and secondly... in the security cam video you CAN see the plane (not to mention all the plane debris and eyewitness accounts which you are quick to ignore).
Here is the plane in the security video, zoomed in (delete spaces in link): ht tp:// tiny url. com / 911pentplane
@SteAndKel That "zoomed in" photo was no proof. All I saw was a bunch of blurry objects and then an outline of a plane super imposed over part of the blurry objects. Sorry, I'm still not convinced. You'll have to do better that that.
Here is a funny thing.....its "impossible" to fly a Boeing 747 40 feet above ground without....nose diving....impossible. End of story. Go and research that yourselves.
Also notice the flash of light in the nose of the aircraft right at the point of impact. A similar flash can be seen in the WTC videos as those jets made impact. Many people mistake those flashes for missile launches or whatever.
I hope this shows that 1) A plane made of lightweight metals CAN desintigrate, and 2) The flash of light is not a missile being launched; but a transfer of kinetic energy into heat.
@SteAndKel I'd be willing to bet it was since this was a test against a nuclear power plant wall. The fact that The Pentagon is not made from nuclear grade concrete is just another thing that makes the title of the video irrelevant. FYI, this plane has an internal fuel capacity over 7,500 L.
@skylerwaite again... ur an idiot... the 9/11 attacks were just that... terriorist attacks... not a government firing missiles on their own security headquaters.
people were on that plane... people called from that plane to their families... people died in that plane... and eye witnesses saw the plane... DEAL WITH IT!
@SteAndKel This is the first I've heard of me being an idiot. On that note, what could have been a proper discussion has just now turned into a name-calling game at my expense, and I bid you adieu.
@SteAndKel Number one is physics and a 100 plus ton Jet with thousands of liters of fuel and to hit at that angle and only do that minimal damage is impossible, Number two I have a friend who was there and he never saw any major parts of a Jet liner no wheels no engines no seats nothing but fragments of metal and some small pieces with red and blue paint on them, He doesnt believe it was the Jet liner but some other craft so believe what you may.
@Krylogenic 'my friend who was there' is irrelevant... it was a jet liner... passengers died on it and it is well documented.
you cant accept that... i can! i have no doubt in my mind that you also dont believe that the titanic actually sank, that the government were the ones who murdered the dinosaurs, that hitler never existed, and that man never walked on the moon.
group up and face facts... it was a terrorist attack.
@SteAndKel I got one for you! I am retired from the military and one of my jobs was to silence anyone coming into a particular zone in South America, we watched as trucks were unloaded and loaded onto U.S Airplanes without markings and what was loaded was drugs and unloaded were weapons. That one of many jobs I was assigned to and Noriega was our buddy as was Saddam Hussein, two of Hussiens majors we failed in one of our commando schools and when they went back they were beheaded.
@SteAndKel yes there was a terrorist attack but our goverment let it happen so they could start the war, grow up and learn something. There were NO WMDs in Iraq zero! the war is about money, building more war toys and more munitions getting the old out of the closet and seeing how effective the new toys are, while Luminati, Cargyle, Blackwater and other military defense contractors make billions. I guess you believe in the Gulf of Tonkin incident? Proven false, thus the reason for Vietnam.
@Krylogenic it is completely illogical that a government would allow 3000 of its citizens to be murdered and allow millions upon millions of dollars worth of damage to occur just to have an excuse to start a war. This would do FAR more harm than good and send out a message to the world that america was a weak country... defensively.
just ACCEPT THE FACT that the USA were attacked by surprise by terrorists on a scale never before seen.
@SteAndKel do you think that the US gov would openly tell the world that they did it to their own people? The US could prevent such a thing from happening if they wanted to. they covered it up, simple.
@shariotoflove the thing that americans have problems accepting is that fact that the US couldnt acually prevent thing from happening... and they didnt... it was a surprise and americans cant handle the fact that they didnt have the power to stop it... and so turn to conspiracy theories...
@SteAndKel well the time between the first plane and second plane was long enough for some activity i.e. scramblers. its just too stupid for the world's greatest intelligence not to pick this up. I think Americans are right to question such shoddy workmanship...if that is the real cause.
This has been flagged as spam show
Thats all good and well, but explain the picture we all saw of the EXIT HOLE!!! This video proves NOTHING except that a Jet DID NOT crash into the Pentagon, so for that, I thank you! It was a MISSILE Ladies and Gentleman! Our Gov't has been lying to us from Day 1 and covering it up, and doing a pretty bad jib at it I might add. They release a 4 second EDITED video of a blurr hitting the pentagon yet SEIZING and storing away 50 other Clear camera angels....whatever !
PokerJoker3 6 hours ago
Thats all good and well, but explain the picture we all saw of the EXIT HOLE!!! This video proves NOTHING
PokerJoker3 6 hours ago
Mmmm, September 10 Pentagon cannot account for over a trillion dollars, September 11 the 'airplane' (cruise missile) hits the Pentagon where all the records are kept, just a coincidence? I think not
green834721 13 hours ago
@green834721 Yah it really amazed me what a bunch of Dumbasses the American Public truly are. I mean if the Govt can cover this crap up, they can do just about anything!
PokerJoker3 6 hours ago
also if you look at the pictures of the hole in the pentagon , you can clearly see offices in the impact zone , paperwork , wooden furniture ect completely unburnt without any charring . yet apparently the very same jet fuel fire at wtc generated enough heat to melt steel and cause catastrophic structure failure causing the buildings to collapse . its embarresing what the us government can so blatently make its citezens believe
andydwyerno1 23 hours ago
you saw a video of how they explained it ? well fuck me ! i saw one of how they explained a single bullet killed jfk made a right turn did a few fucking zig zags and found someone else . its the fucking pentagon !! thousands of survailance cameras ,, they'd see a mouse fart but cant seem to find footage of a fucking plane dropping by .. also the turbine they photographed ,, rolles royce said it resembeled nothing they had ever manufactured , and was too small for a plane , more that of a missile
andydwyerno1 23 hours ago
This didn't prove shit about shit, you're not very good at this debunking thing.
WormWthWings 1 day ago
OK.If a large plane did hit then why has not one single video of the plane before impact ever been released in the many years since 9-11,other than the one grainy image? You cant tell me that out of all of the many cameras in and around the Pentagon,not one of them caught this. If there is no cover up (and I'm on the fence about that) then why no clear images of the impact? You cant believe that this location only had one camera!
zLOSTNOMOREz 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@zLOSTNOMOREz
"You cant tell me that out of all of the many cameras in and around the Pentagon,"
Oh YES I CAN, You know why? Because I've been there, and you haven't.
TWO cameras caught the plane, why the F*CK should more than TWO CAMERAS be covering the SAME approach? Are you LISTENING to yourself?
And that one "grainy frame" is enough, because you can pick out the OUTLINE of the object, and I'd LOVE for you to explain how THIS is a missile:
/watch?v=Z8v8ai2-S0Q#t=1m6s
Alaskaslim 2 days ago
@zLOSTNOMOREz
I saw a video of how they explained the plain crashing into the pentagon.
inferno64906 1 day ago
The thing is we never EVER saw a big airplane crash into anything at full speed...All the plane accidents envolved the attempt of stopping the plane or reducing its speed as much as possible. In 9/11 they came at full speed and ALL the cameras which normal citizens had were not able to record in HD image...The first HD image ever transmitted to the world was in World Soccer Cup 2002 by the Japonese- korean TVs - Some of the conspirancy theories were made based on the fact of weird footages.
Embraer091 3 days ago
The thing is we never EVER saw a big airplane crash into anything at full speed...All the plane accidents envolved the attempt of stopping the plane or reducing its speed as much as possible. In 9/11 they came at full speed and ALL the cameras which normal citizens had were not able to record in HD image...The first HD image ever transmitted to the world was in World Soccer Cup 2002 by the Japonese- korean TVs - Some of the conspirancy theories were made based on the fact of weird footages.
Embraer091 3 days ago
Here's the only proof you need. The plane took off from the air port with its people. The plane and people didn't reach their destination. Anyone that thinks otherwise doesn't deserve to live.
Governm3nt 6 days ago
@Governm3nt THANK YOU. The rest of you WASTES OF LIFE NEED TO GO HANG YOURSELF IN THE WOODS.
heraldosaid 6 days ago
@Governm3nt
That's the only proof we need? A fake passenger log assigned to a fake flight? Wow, you are a fucking lemming. You will kill yourself long before I will, most likely by stepping off a cliff because the US Government told you it was safe.
dropintospace 5 days ago
@dropintospace How was it fake? Families lost their loved ones who boarded a plane. Money was lost for destroying a plane. You fucking dumb ass should realize your the very small minority of idiots that think the whole world is a cover up. Is there any towers there anymore? Are the people that walked with us that was involved here anymore? You should fucking be killed.
Governm3nt 5 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Governm3nt he mere fact all video footage from all 86 Pentagon cameras have not been released means there is a cover-up, meaning what we are told is a fucking lie.
Support a FALSE FLAG TERRORISM PROHIBITION Act. If you don't, it's clear you are in the false flag terrorism business; and if so, lite yourself on fire and see what those 3000 people felt like when your USGov murdered them on 9/11.
dpetrano 5 days ago
@Governm3nt ... wow... hahha.. what are you like 9?..its 2012 and u still believe the government on this bullshit... were u even born when it happend?
GreenTea4101 22 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
OMG !! I see everything so clearly Shown here ! Only a human with the 10th of a monkkee brain would argue these Clearly Shown Facts. A. The Wreckage B. The Fuel Explosion Mark Left Behind = No Missile. C. The 757 Captured on Film. D. 130+ Witnesses. E. The Light Poles. F. The Internal Wreckage. G. No Blast Evidence on Lawn or Inside Pent. H. The Phone Calls on Board. I. The Attempts from Terror Sympathizers to Slander Victims last Reports. J. Zero Evidence to Prove Otherwise.
SkuIICrusherGhost 19 hours ago
@Spindry96 lol everyone here is making an uneducated guess, but it doesn't take a genius to see that this video shows that indeed a plane cannot go thru even one concrete wall let alone 3.
OldschoolLo 1 week ago
Er, but we can actually see a plane in this video.
How stupid do they think we are?
historypoliticsbb 1 week ago
Ummmm proof how? The"plane" at the pentagon went thru multiple walls this proves that a place DID NOT hit the pentagon
OldschoolLo 1 week ago
@OldschoolLo Your an expert in what exactly? Or are you just making an uneducated guess?
Spindry96 1 week ago
@OldschoolLo
"The"plane" at the pentagon went thru multiple walls"
Yeah, so? You DO know what the walls at the Pentagon are made of right? I'm assuming you do, otherwise you wouldn't be talking about it.
But just to be clear for those who don't know, it's not concrete, like a lot of people who have never been there believe.
So since it's not concrete, I don't see the problem, mind explaining?
Alaskaslim 2 days ago
the hole in the pentagon was like 20ft. The wing span of a commercial boeing 747 is like 60
roul3688 1 week ago
I do wonder if there are people who still believe what the government has created to deceive the US and the world, They didn't have a problem showing "evidence" of who and how this was planned, but can not show the various security tapes from the pentagon, nearby businesses, etc...?? the proof is in the hole the "object" that hit the pentagon left, where are the wing segments, wouldn't they of left at the least a scratch on the sides of the hole that was created at impact?
epyon2k6 2 weeks ago
Keep trying, it amazing how much Bullshit you guys come up with haha US government fail.
The most heavily protected airspace in the world got breached without one missile going off. All those missile launchers around the pentagon what did the Defence department have a change of heart on military spending that day?
Stringyheads 2 weeks ago
This juggernott is either very stupid or he thinks everybody else is! Did the terrorist steal an f4 phantom...man what the hell is this?
chochopav 2 weeks ago
The ACTUAL flight path -vs- the OFFICAL story flight path
is proof positive that the plane did NOT hit the Pentagon.
See ht tp CitizenInvestigationTeam com
The OFFICIAL story cites JUST ONE plane heading toward the Pentagon.
So, regardless of whether another plane, or a missile,
or some other thing caused the explosion,
if ONE plane (verified at link above by Pentagon police)
flew in an alternate path to what the OFFICIAL story places a plane's path
then the OFFICIAL story is FALSE.
2Truth4Liberty 2 weeks ago
News you should know....
Bombs INSIDE pentagon!
See YT Vid:
9-11 Cheney Rumsfeld Black Operation at Pentagon...15min.
also...Pentagon Attack Papers....6 min
MrNoblemanoflove 2 weeks ago
See YT Vid:
9-11 Cheney Rumsfeld Black Operation at Pentagon...15min.
also...Pentagon Attack Papers....
MrNoblemanoflove 2 weeks ago
the guy who crashed the plane at the pentagon must of been a fucking good pilot then, not a scratch on the front lawn!!!!!!!!!!!!! he missed the streetlights hit near enough bang on ground level whislst travelling between 300-500 mph/kph so fast all the drivers by missed him and he managed to disintergrate a 200tonne plane and 4x 3 tonne jet engines . for those that dont understand sarcasm here is an example.
TheFeeMachine 2 weeks ago
@TheFeeMachine Actually there was like 5 or 6 street lights knocked over including the one that was knocked over and smashed a cab.
TheTruthHurtsYup 2 weeks ago
@TheTruthHurtsYup ok so i didnt count the streetlamps my apologies but to actually believe a plane hit it is friggin rediculous im not one for conspirises but i know what my eyes tell me.
TheFeeMachine 2 weeks ago
LOL ...... proof?
IranContraScumDid911 3 weeks ago
@IranContraScumDid911
The wings intact all of the way through no fireball explosion
The nose disintegrated completely, while the supposed nose poked a whole through the opposite wall of the Pentagon which is not constructed of the same reinforced material as reactor walls
Why can we clearly see a small jet from start to finish here, but not the larger one striking the Pentagon?
Why edit out the video showing close up of damage and debris did the black-box vaporize as well?
DarfurDeng 2 weeks ago
@DarfurDeng Cool .... apples and oranges. This demonstrates the laws of motion perfectly. The effect is different at an oblique angle. In every collision there is an equal and opposite force on both objects. The same force the plane is delivering to the wall here the wall is delivering to the plane. The energy is conserved. The planes energy is in its velocity and mass. As we see the energy transferred we see a loss in velocity and mass. No Boeing size hole at the Pentagon
IranContraScumDid911 2 weeks ago
How can a vaporised plane go through all the walls in the pentagon,i mean when exactly did it vaporize,after it went through the last wall?.The US gov are full of shit the only hijackers that day were Bush and Cheny who hijacked the US constitution
EddieHitler1000 3 weeks ago
Show the rest of this video and what was left if this is true about turning into dust. Oh yeah I thought they didn't even find wings.
m19b84h 3 weeks ago
I hope nobody was in that jet were they?
m19b84h 3 weeks ago
START THE REVOLUTION NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IM IN THE ARMY AND I CANT STAND THE WAY THIS GOVERNMENT HAS BEEN GOING FOR SO LONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AMERICAS MILITIA YOU HAVE MY SWORD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL FIGHT FOR THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA!!!!!!!!!! I AM A PATRIOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THAT WHENEVER ANY FORM OF GOVERNMENT BECOMES DESTRUCTIVE OF THESE ENDS, IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO ALTER OR ABOLISH IT, AND INSTITUTE A NEW GOVERNMENT - DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE
md123420 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have seen, like many of us, several plane disaster videos. I DON'T CLAIM ANYTHING, just wondering, how only on 9/11 attacks planes disappeared almost totally but on the other vids there was tons of parts of the wreckage on the other crashes. The difference just makes me wondering.
Scumbot404 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
Scumbot404 3 weeks ago
An F4 into nuclear plant rated walls, is a HORRIBLE analogy to a Boeing 757 hitting a cinderblock and concrete wall. Nice try though.
CalHorns34 3 weeks ago
Didn't ya hear? They've changed their story. Now they're saying the plane DIDN'T "vaporize" & they've put some nice disinformation errr... I mean pictures online to prove it. I'm guessing that's what this is too. lol,It looks like sand. Ahhh, "9/11 physics"
mrh785 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If it was AA77, they certainly would have shown ONE of the videos....sooooo.....
THEY are the ones FORCING us to become therorists of conspiracies.,,,
Now turing citizens into suspects as it's goal...
MrNoblemanoflove 1 month ago
Of course no plane hit the pentagon, even the 'official eyewitnesses' are hilarious. 'It banked left, no it was right, the plane stayed dead straight, the nose fell off, the delicate nose ploughed through all those walls, the engines entered, no the engines bounced off, impact was at 9.15, no it was 9.40, 'i saw the terrified faces on board', the wings sheared off, hit the ground, folded back, sliced through, the wheels werent down, but they still hit a trailer, ridiculus lies! 9/11= inside job
wellifthemediasaysit 1 month ago
This video proves nothing
natestarider 1 month ago 2
The believers and non believers were or could have been tricked with UFO tech your not Eva going to look there are you
busabaybe 1 month ago
that a concrete wall of at least 20 feet long. The pentagon does not have that kind of walls and have a lot of windows. And, where are the wings damage in the pentagon???
josemanuel599 1 month ago
@josemanuel599 They do have a radiation wall similar to this in the "C" barrier of the pentagon. But if you look at the photographs after the "plane" hit there is a small hole (about 10 ft wide and maybe 10-15ft high) in the C barrier of the pentagon. A plane couldn't have crashed through 2 walls, hit the radiation barrier then disintegrate. The laws of physics just don't allow that. plus the nose of the plane would have been DESTROYED after going through the first wall.
zachyboy13528 1 month ago
if i drove a 57 chevy into a concrete wall.........and drove a Farrari into a similar wall.....your going to get different results....
RYNO4880 1 month ago
Ha !! what a load of shit !!... No matter what proof you got of a plane hitting the pentagon, People need to see the real cam footage from all the camera's surrounding the building, And why is it that witnesses from the wtc crashes never saw or heard planes till they saw the news footages ??
whaqd76 2 months ago
@whaqd76 You crazies believe your conspiracy theories with the same fervency as a devout theist. I've seen a complilation of home footage of the planes hitting the towers. Oh, lemme guess, they are government agents! Rather than dispute facts that you are too mindblind to look up yourself, let me ask you something: How can our government be so incompetent in every other facet of governing, but manage to pull this off? Why has noone on their death bed spoke the truth about this from conscience?
gumpdydumpty 1 month ago
i thot i saw a putty cat..i did, i did, i did see a putty cat...
lanagual 2 months ago
a plane hit the pentagon. you can see a dent near the hole from the engine in photos taken before the collapse
FastUnit4 2 months ago
@FastUnit4 missles can do that too
bioniclefan1999 2 months ago
@FastUnit4 so where are the wings and engines and tailplane?
If youd care to look at the wtc crashes the wings severed the steel core columns and here they cant break a window or leave any impact mark at all.
zenoist2 2 months ago
@FastUnit4 But where are the wing marks ? In almost all of the photos there is only a large hole .there would be wing marks on the left and right side of the wall but there isnt any at all . It just doesnt add up to a plane that large not leaving wing marks . go look at the pictures where it shows the hole only just after the inpact . Its just a large holeand nothing else at all .
dawala1000 1 month ago
'inside job' on three!
one..
two..
INSIDE JOB!
thelostboys565 2 months ago
Nice Pics but more interesting were pictures of what you can not see in the cloud. However, the wall is built solid components such as landing gear or engine shafts do not break down into dust.
MultiHalfpipe 2 months ago 2
Comment removed
mannequinwizard 2 months ago
Ok dipshits there was a fucking plane that crashed into the fucking Pentagon. My uncle was a first responder and he went inside. I trust him not some nerd in Asia. So why dont you shut the fuck up and get a life
ClassicCPvideos 2 months ago
@ClassicCPvideos BS! No one went inside until long after the fire was out and the building was declared safe to enter. Who's in Asia?? What planet are you on? LOL As far as getting a life...thanks! Got one and it doesn't include being brain fucked by the mass media and government.
Sananda8888 2 months ago
@Sananda8888 "No one went inside until long after the fire was out" - WHAT?
Even for a TWOOFER that is ONE BIG PORKY. Go wash your mouth out with soap
Then go STUDY reports of people being rescued from the flames
Go FIND the pictures of the corpses on the web
Go LEARN something, you confabulating and slanderous parrot
beachcomber2008 2 months ago
@beachcomber : The 2nd plane was doing 540mph.
MrBtownd 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrBtownd "The 2nd plane was doing 540mph" - Yes indeed. But not at the Pentagon
beachcomber2008 2 months ago
Carol Vorderman - part of the NWO Lizard Illuminati conspiracy!
crapatev 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@crapatev "Carol Vorderman - part of the NWO" - For sure. The lizards went back in time to make sure. It's either "lizards" or"men in white coats" for some people
beachcomber2008 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal[2], projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political organizations.
COINTELPRO tactics included discrediting targets through psychological warfare, planting false reports in the media, smearing through forged letters, harassment, wrongful imprisonment, and extralegal violence !!
wellifthemediasaysit 3 months ago
btw one of the security videos did appear on news. it showed an explosion but no plane?! and we are supposed to believe a plane hit the pentagon?
shinsuhkhan 3 months ago
Release all the confiscated security videos of businesses neighboring the pentagon. Let us see those videos and decide. Really tough to believe a plane crashed into pentagon, when theyre hiding all the videos. Its been over 10 years. Release or remain guilty!
shinsuhkhan 3 months ago
so why not release ALL the tapes of the pentagon on 9/11 so we can see the plane disappearing into dust. it would stop all the controversy, right? why are they hiding the tapes. me thinks they have something they want to keep to themselves.
cfconant 3 months ago
@MrSammo1 also the pentagon is designed to withstand cruise missile impacts yet the plane went through 5 layers of the pentagon
JLDickins 3 months ago
Comment removed
Facts158 3 months ago
stfu how is this proof. for starters the planes a different size. whats its hitting his a different size AND it mentions to tips of the wings escape... there were no wings at the pentagon so this just explains a JET (not a plane) going at 500mph cnt even go straight thru a building wall with out leaving evidence of its wings. 911 pentagon however there is no video of the plane and no wings.... wake the FCK UP
Facts158 3 months ago
@Facts158 Not to mention the fact that it leaves out the after effects. Instead it tells you what to believe.
MrSammo1 3 months ago
@Facts158 yeah the wings were found and moved. the proof right here, plane goes into building, plane smashes up.
kdreamland 3 months ago
@kdreamland and just like someone already said..... if what happened in this video is true... how did the plane that completely smashes on impact, go through another 2/3 walls? ALSO theres a video of a report made minutes after the pentagon was hit and the reporter says there are no wings or any plane pieces. ITS A CRIME SCENE, they wouldn't pick up the wings leave everything else and drive away. there were no wings. MY OPINION no plane. and this video is far from proof. READ 9/11 10 years later
Facts158 3 months ago
thats what u get america. they deserved to die
pandadust1 3 months ago
"On a wall designed to absorb impact" not the cinder block and mortar walls of the pentagram.
usmcoth 3 months ago
that isnt proof. wow. A 747 and a fighter jet have very different properties AND even if this would be true of a 747 (it wouldnt) crashing into pure concrete (it didn't, there were windows) you're committing the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent:
If a plane hit the pentagon, there would be no trace of a plane
there was no trace of a plane
therefore a plane hit the pentagon
is INCORRECT
gr3yh47 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD
theinfounderground[.]com/forum/viewtopic[.]php?t=5367
TyroneSandalphon 3 months ago
One thing I've learned for sure. NEVER TRUST THE GOVERNMENT.
MetaIhead89 3 months ago 9
I love this video! proof the airplane disintegrated!
but wait, it also penetrated three walls?
but it disintegrated?
well, Pentagon, which is it? did it evaporate or penetrate? you cant have it both ways.
rono8582 3 months ago 16
@rono8582 brilliant comment!
Facts158 3 months ago
@rono8582 Not to mention the fact that this wall was designed to withstand the impact unlike the pentagon. Hmmmmm....
rickslamon 2 weeks ago
@rono8582 ...So lemme get this straight, this is your version of physics: The plane either disintegrates on the spot as soon as it hits the wall causing no further damage to the structure, or remains intact in spite of slamming into a concrete building at several hundred miles per hour?
Ghisguth 2 weeks ago
@Ghisguth it is a rhetorical statement because the 2 official stories that the pentagon delivered were that the plane "dissolved on impact and because of the fuel" but at the same time, it visibly penetrated a few walls and went several meters IN to the building.
the 1 plane simply cannot do both things.
rono8582 1 week ago
@Ghisguth it cannot be strong enough to penetrate concrete but completely dissipate due to normal burning kerosene fuel.
rono8582 1 week ago
I went to the zoo last week end and i overheard some chimps laughing and joking about how absurd the official 911 pentagon story was.
Got to hand it to those chimps its not easy to pull the wool over their eyes.
stiffex 3 months ago 2
@stiffex lol....nicely done sir. haha.
CathartikRequiem 3 months ago
okay, so at the pentagon the plan and the wall just atomise together and completely dissapear?
\
crzywitboy3 3 months ago
What Proof? It atomised! What happened to its 2 ton engine then? or flight 77's two engines? - Did they atomise as well?? Its not prood it's BULLSHIT!
tubemonks 3 months ago
@tubemonks why do they need to make vidos like this when 1000 cameras are recording the pentagon 24 hours a day :) Because it was not a plane that hit it !!
F1brawfa 3 months ago 48
This has been flagged as spam show
@F1brawfa I KNOW - That's what I'm saying!!!!!!!!
tubemonks 3 months ago
Comment removed
Toni112007 3 months ago
@F1brawfa Yes. No plane hit the Pentagon. Is incredible why most of people in this country believe the white house history.
josemanuel599 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tubemonks If there was proof the pentagon wouldve released it. Plain and fucking simple.
G1formation 3 months ago
u see small pointy thing on vids which Cant be a jumbo jet, witness said 20 head jet the most, size of missile
Headshothorror4488 3 months ago
@Headshothorror4488 Go and find the video which actually points out flight 77 in an outline and shows blurred but obvious blue and red markings. There are at least 2 vids that are similar. Also amongst the confusion a lot of people saw a lot of things, including those who actually described flight 77 to those who claimed to have seen ufo's, holograms, giant birds, and george bush riding a phoenix. So what's your point ?????????
steelflame1 3 months ago
A 757 has a wing span of 125 ft. and two 9.5 thousand pound engines which sit 70ft behind the cockpit. Quite different from this compact jet smashing into nuclear protection designed walls.
FragFestFTW 3 months ago 38
@FragFestFTW No, it's no different..... it's exactly the same :)
bigcrabrob 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FragFestFTW thumbs up, thumbs up, thumbs up.
themr1down 3 months ago
@FragFestFTW aye, let alone the fact that the "plane" had to be bolted to a platform, because they understood the simple fact that something going that speed, so close to the ground is scientifically impossible, but only a logical person would know that, and us americans are paid for our ignorance more than our honesty.
natqoh 2 weeks ago
Yeah wtf? This doesnt prove anything about 9/11
sativakiller 3 months ago 2
this test has nothing to do with the pentagon, the plane is differnt as well as the thickness of the wall.
tsharpmac420 3 months ago 2
yeah but that is an awesome sight seeing an old F-4 getting rammed into a wall
a94robss 3 months ago
Unfortunately everyone here is correct, that is not a 757. Furthermore even this "experiment" show/proves that the wings do not fold backwards as stated by Mike Walter in his explanation of the events . The video clearly show the wings slicing through the concrete walls. Thus the pentagon would have a hole in it that follows the contours of a plane (engines included). This is a poor attempt by a patriotic American. I wish this video proved what you believe, but the evidence shows otherwise.
ostofe16 3 months ago 2
@ostofe16 The wings themselves are not shown going through the wall. The tips of them are sheered off and continue moving forward outside the dimensions of the concrete barrier. There was nothing on the outside edges to stop them. The rest of the plane disintegrated upon impact.
bonchie1 3 months ago
haha fail. this little bird is not a boeng 757
OlioPL 4 months ago
This little bitty plane is not a jumbo jet. Get real.
Show me the wing damage. Show me the engines.
But...you cant.
FragFestFTW 4 months ago
@FragFestFTW Neither is a 757 a jumbo jet.
bonchie1 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bonchie1 So you are saying this plane and a 757 are the same? You missed the point of my post.
FragFestFTW 3 months ago
Nice video. I suppose the truthers will demand people to find huge sections of this plane still in tact. "WERE IS THE TAIL SECTION!!!!!". Dumb fucks
stebecool 4 months ago
NICE...why would the government lie about this...we all saw the hijacked planes hit in new york...so why is this one a missle?
human0un 4 months ago
@human0un because this building was five stories tall not 80. Impossible for that size of a plane to pull this off
JJbones88 4 months ago
all somebody needs to do is show me just 1 airplane body part (a wing section, some fuselage, a tail section etc..) that was removed from the pentagon? or even 1 video of an actual airliner crashing into it?? people wake up!...I hate stuoid sheep
inbyhisgrace 4 months ago
well... first problem, this is a small plane smashing into several foot thick concrete designed to contain a nuclear reactor, at ground level - with a ground level vector... versus a jumbo jet cashing at a steep downward angle into a glorified business office.
This has zero relevance.
silentthunderstorm 4 months ago
you can just tell from the pentagon footage of the explosion that it couldn't have been a plane that did it. VERY obvious weapon explosion.
brucelee6790 4 months ago
atomised? :)
geyza0711 4 months ago
What does this video have to do with 9/11?
NotStoopid0228 4 months ago
@NotStoopid0228 many ppl didnt see parts of the plane so they say its an inside job, but clearly, they are uneducated on the physics of it
spamsam15 4 months ago
@spamsam15 hello, the walls of the pentagon are 18" thick, consisting of highly substantial steel and concrete reinforcement modified mix, as is shown on the video the aircraft atomized and didn't go through the wall, even though it is a far thicker block and hypothesizing it actually travelled all the way through, the pieces surviving the original impact could not possibly go through another five walls built exactly the same way leaving a ten foot perfectly round, THIS COULD, ''BUNKER BUSTER ''
josuuv 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
how can a plane crash into such a low rise building without grazing or destroying the poles in front of the part of the building where the 'plane crashed'
such a clean pilot that he didn't even strike down one pole while flying a 100 feet wide plane at almost ground level???
what a joke
guruget 4 months ago
The plane that"hit the pentagon" was a 3 engine passenger jet, not a tiny fighter from Vietnam. Should have been 2 holes from the engines, not one big gaping hole. The laws of physics were apparently suspended on September 11th.
ibanez991 4 months ago
This wasn't a normal wall though, it was something specially designed for nuclear plants.
chaosproduction 4 months ago
@chaosproduction I pretty sure that the Pentagon isn't a "normal" wall, either.
krelbar 4 months ago
@krelbar It is. This wall in the video is specially designed for nuclear plants and would withstand small aircraft crashing into it. The walls of the Pentagon were not reinforced to withstand the impact of a passenger plane.
chaosproduction 4 months ago
@chaosproduction the portion of the Pentagon that was hit had recently been renovated to withstand attack. I'm not saying that they were as strong as in this video, as whatever hit the pentagon did go through the wall. I just remembered that it had been coincidentally renovated just prior to 9/11.
Sterlacea 4 months ago
@Sterlacea Actually those renovations were not designed to withstand aircraft impact, but this did help in decreasing the amount of casulities that could of been. It was because of these renovations that the impact site of the Pentagon didn't collapse sooner.
The timing was just coincidence.
chaosproduction 4 months ago
@Sterlacea sorry mate, but the part of the building (housing the ONI and its accounts dept), was the only section awaiting renovation, dont that beat all. i mean the office which the previous day anounce it couldnt account for 2.3 TRILLION dollars, were did it all go?... awe, lost all the docs in the fire darn it!!!!!!!, I FOUND IT IN MY BACK POCKET, IT WAS ALL THERE HONEST.........JUST CANT GET THE RECEIPTS MAN !!!!, that beats all coincidences on a day of the mother of all coincidences.
josuuv 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Concerning the planecrash in Reno Nevada)
John Townes, a Reno pilot, said the plane didn't sound right moments before the crash.
"It wasn't quite vertical. It was at a very slight angle and because of that I think it probably saved a lot of people," he said. "Normally when you see an air crash, you see recognizable wreckage. There was nothing, just little bits of metal."
Also, the crater was only 8 feet wide.
Guess that must have been a missile in Nevada as well..
LT1HILLINGHOE 4 months ago
(Concerning the planecrash in Reno Nevada)
John Townes, a Reno pilot, said the plane didn't sound right moments before the crash.
"It wasn't quite vertical. It was at a very slight angle and because of that I think it probably saved a lot of people," he said. "Normally when you see an air crash, you see recognizable wreckage. There was nothing, just little bits of metal."
Also, the crater was only 8 feet wide.
Guess that must have been a missile in Nevada as well..
LT1HILLINGHOE 4 months ago
A 757 CAN'T do 500 mph at sea level top speed is only 360mph under 8000ft. If it did try to come in at a high speed it would ricashae upward because of air turbulence & miss the target. The whole issue is just a fairytale, it wasn't a plane, it was just a BIG a lie.
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it“…Joseph Goebbels
Anyone who doesn't support a new 9/11 investigation is afraid of either knowing or revealing the truth.
Mike "me"
mikestheman3 4 months ago 2
Comment removed
mikestheman3 4 months ago
A plane didnt hit the pentagon. Show me one of the many confiscated tapes that shows CLEAR proof and i will shut up and apologize.
Lemonskill77 4 months ago
@Lemonskill77 I totally agree with you. Show me irrefutable proof and I'll apologize as well and shut the Hell up. P.S. I'm a United States citizen, live in Washington state, and am NOT a conspiracy enthusiast. Just a guy that questions some of what I have seen and find it very difficult to believe what "THEY" are telling us what we should believe.
J.R.
jrsanford 4 months ago
@jrsanford
I am "THEY" and I am going to find you.
washboardblues 4 months ago
@washboardblues Well then, you'd better pack a lunch and bring lots of your friends!
J.R.
jrsanford 4 months ago
Well then, you'd better pack a lunch and bring lots of your friends.
J.R.
jrsanford 4 months ago
@washboardblues OOOOOOOoooooooooooooo!
offwiththefairies77 4 months ago
@Lemonskill77 same goes for me!
galaxything 4 months ago
@Killer0fTheSun the reason videos have not been released is because it would cause unnecessary grief to the families... which quite frankly i agree with... i dont want to watch more videos of people being murdered.
and secondly... in the security cam video you CAN see the plane (not to mention all the plane debris and eyewitness accounts which you are quick to ignore).
Here is the plane in the security video, zoomed in (delete spaces in link): ht tp:// tiny url. com / 911pentplane
SteAndKel 4 months ago
@SteAndKel That "zoomed in" photo was no proof. All I saw was a bunch of blurry objects and then an outline of a plane super imposed over part of the blurry objects. Sorry, I'm still not convinced. You'll have to do better that that.
J.R.
jrsanford 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jrsanford no problem, read this detailed blog which that photo was taken from here (remove spaces in link):
ht tp : // tiny url. com / pentagon911blog
SteAndKel 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jrsanford no problem, read this detailed blog which that photo was taken from here (remove spaces in link):
ht tp : // tiny url . com / pentagon911blog
SteAndKel 4 months ago
Here is a funny thing.....its "impossible" to fly a Boeing 747 40 feet above ground without....nose diving....impossible. End of story. Go and research that yourselves.
Killer0fTheSun 4 months ago
@Killer0fTheSun Well, for a start, it wasn't a 747 they were flying.
deafened 4 months ago
Also notice the flash of light in the nose of the aircraft right at the point of impact. A similar flash can be seen in the WTC videos as those jets made impact. Many people mistake those flashes for missile launches or whatever.
I hope this shows that 1) A plane made of lightweight metals CAN desintigrate, and 2) The flash of light is not a missile being launched; but a transfer of kinetic energy into heat.
stfuplz13 4 months ago
that was pretty kwl.
SuperCourtney31 4 months ago
Obama is a fuck hole
AngryAtTechnology75 4 months ago
Google Mike Ruppert.
eldiablo68 4 months ago
Because our government totally fired missles at our defense system and economic trade towers. Yeah that makes sense. Great conspiracy theories guys.
ZappsMcJack 4 months ago
NOT THE SAME THEREFORE THIS TEST IS BULLSHIT
willwilliamsonthe1st 4 months ago
@willwilliamsonthe1st
EXACTLY.
THESE MORONIC CREATURES WILL STILL BE DOING THIS IN 50 YEARS TIME.
bertyUK 4 months ago
I don't see a fireball...
skylerwaite 4 months ago
@skylerwaite u dont see a fireball because this plane probably wasnt carrying thousands of litres of fuel that a normal passenger plane does...
SteAndKel 4 months ago
@SteAndKel I'd be willing to bet it was since this was a test against a nuclear power plant wall. The fact that The Pentagon is not made from nuclear grade concrete is just another thing that makes the title of the video irrelevant. FYI, this plane has an internal fuel capacity over 7,500 L.
skylerwaite 4 months ago
@skylerwaite again... ur an idiot... the 9/11 attacks were just that... terriorist attacks... not a government firing missiles on their own security headquaters.
people were on that plane... people called from that plane to their families... people died in that plane... and eye witnesses saw the plane... DEAL WITH IT!
SteAndKel 4 months ago
@SteAndKel This is the first I've heard of me being an idiot. On that note, what could have been a proper discussion has just now turned into a name-calling game at my expense, and I bid you adieu.
skylerwaite 4 months ago
@skylerwaite the fact u r one of these idiots that thinks 9/11 is a conspiracy is enough for me to call you an idiot.
SteAndKel 4 months ago
@SteAndKel Number one is physics and a 100 plus ton Jet with thousands of liters of fuel and to hit at that angle and only do that minimal damage is impossible, Number two I have a friend who was there and he never saw any major parts of a Jet liner no wheels no engines no seats nothing but fragments of metal and some small pieces with red and blue paint on them, He doesnt believe it was the Jet liner but some other craft so believe what you may.
Krylogenic 4 months ago
@Krylogenic 'my friend who was there' is irrelevant... it was a jet liner... passengers died on it and it is well documented.
you cant accept that... i can! i have no doubt in my mind that you also dont believe that the titanic actually sank, that the government were the ones who murdered the dinosaurs, that hitler never existed, and that man never walked on the moon.
group up and face facts... it was a terrorist attack.
SteAndKel 4 months ago
@SteAndKel I got one for you! I am retired from the military and one of my jobs was to silence anyone coming into a particular zone in South America, we watched as trucks were unloaded and loaded onto U.S Airplanes without markings and what was loaded was drugs and unloaded were weapons. That one of many jobs I was assigned to and Noriega was our buddy as was Saddam Hussein, two of Hussiens majors we failed in one of our commando schools and when they went back they were beheaded.
Krylogenic 4 months ago
@Krylogenic once again irrelevant... it was a terrorist attack... accept it.
SteAndKel 4 months ago
@SteAndKel yes there was a terrorist attack but our goverment let it happen so they could start the war, grow up and learn something. There were NO WMDs in Iraq zero! the war is about money, building more war toys and more munitions getting the old out of the closet and seeing how effective the new toys are, while Luminati, Cargyle, Blackwater and other military defense contractors make billions. I guess you believe in the Gulf of Tonkin incident? Proven false, thus the reason for Vietnam.
Krylogenic 4 months ago
@Krylogenic it is completely illogical that a government would allow 3000 of its citizens to be murdered and allow millions upon millions of dollars worth of damage to occur just to have an excuse to start a war. This would do FAR more harm than good and send out a message to the world that america was a weak country... defensively.
just ACCEPT THE FACT that the USA were attacked by surprise by terrorists on a scale never before seen.
SteAndKel 4 months ago
@SteAndKel do you think that the US gov would openly tell the world that they did it to their own people? The US could prevent such a thing from happening if they wanted to. they covered it up, simple.
shariotoflove 4 months ago
@shariotoflove the thing that americans have problems accepting is that fact that the US couldnt acually prevent thing from happening... and they didnt... it was a surprise and americans cant handle the fact that they didnt have the power to stop it... and so turn to conspiracy theories...
SteAndKel 4 months ago
@SteAndKel well the time between the first plane and second plane was long enough for some activity i.e. scramblers. its just too stupid for the world's greatest intelligence not to pick this up. I think Americans are right to question such shoddy workmanship...if that is the real cause.
shariotoflove 4 months ago
@shariotoflove there have been plenty of confirmed explanations as to why there were no scramblers near the highjacked planes.
SteAndKel 4 months ago