@HamZang1124 most of these Korean-made war movies which I have seen until now were adopting the almost one-sided way of drawing, even though Japanese Allied army occupied most of whole the Korean land and beat up noobs of your country :)
against a superior force in number and short range warfare on land...Japanese superior rifles against bows and arrows...there was no chance that chosun army can thwart the superior enemy.
the only bright hope was for General Yi to train a navy with little funding to fight to defend this small country..against the onslaught of might of japanese invasion..? if we focus on that there is a lesson for me...against a superior force..Sun TZu : know thy self and thy enemy as yourself..you will win
Holy fuck, these Korean dudes look so fucking badass they look so thick that they can wrestle a bull and plus, they have magnificent beard.... Please, present-day Korean dudes, don't follow Japan's example of girly-looking guys. I'm so glad you folks still have an actual army.
Won Gyun, the Korean Ephialtes. If not for Yi Soo-shin's reinstatement in 1597, Chosun would have been doomed for sure due to his unnecessary blunders.
oh ya at this time did the Ming took part in the imjin war ? and somehow to admiral yi remind me of someone ..... in china sry i keep on talking about china as i am a chinese
@yichen100 The Ming Court also supplied some naval assets under one of their admirals (I'm away from my references at the moment, so I can't come up with the Chinese admiral's name). If I recall correctly, the Ming admiral was more conservative, much less aggressive than Admiral Yi Sun Shin, less aggressive than the Chinese generals sent down from the North after defeating the Ningxia rebels and the Jurchen to help Korea.
Japanese did have cannons but (a) their ships were not built strong enough to support them and (b) their cannon range was notably shorter than the korean ones
@yichen100 Not so much poor/unable to afford cannon as it was Japan's rugged, mountainous geography that hindered the development of cannon. Cannon of the period were heavy, clumsy, needed strong draft animals and good roads to move them around. Japan is mountainous, had few good roads, the limited arable land meant limited ability to raise and maintain large draft animals in large numbers. Japanese warfare evolved accordingly, and they simply took what they knew along with them to Korea.
@T1000579 Japanese naval warfare was like earlier European naval warfare; ships were fighting platforms for foot soldiers to fight from and across. See my remarks re: why little or no Japanese cannon.
You have noooo idea.... each faction regarded the other generally with a degree of contempt(!), and tended to fight recklessly as a result (at least at first).... plus one must remember that the Japanese had just finished a civil war that had lasted over 200 years! The samural and their ashigaru footsoldiers were all generally combat-hardened professionals, more so than the Koreans, as were the Ming Chinese who came to Korea's aid. Think of it as a three-way trainwreck...
@crazykorean2268 And light or no armor vs. armor as standard AND arquebuses in large numbers = heavier casualties for the poor sods without the armor or muskets charging in tight masses armed only with spears or halberds. >;p
haha this is comedy
taiyakiuser 1 month ago
@taiyakiuser
no, the fact that you are japanese is real comedy :)
HamZang1124 3 weeks ago
@HamZang1124 most of these Korean-made war movies which I have seen until now were adopting the almost one-sided way of drawing, even though Japanese Allied army occupied most of whole the Korean land and beat up noobs of your country :)
taiyakiuser 3 weeks ago
@taiyakiuser
whatever 嫌韓 NETOUYO :)
HamZang1124 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
AngusOnkel 1 month ago
@mayo10er Name of the series.... I will try to buy it.... somewhere :-)
AngusOnkel 1 month ago
against a superior force in number and short range warfare on land...Japanese superior rifles against bows and arrows...there was no chance that chosun army can thwart the superior enemy.
the only bright hope was for General Yi to train a navy with little funding to fight to defend this small country..against the onslaught of might of japanese invasion..? if we focus on that there is a lesson for me...against a superior force..Sun TZu : know thy self and thy enemy as yourself..you will win
quong1 2 months ago
@quong1 one skilled archer =10 ordinary musketeers. Think rate of fire and reliability.
aa3gunner 2 weeks ago
Holy fuck, these Korean dudes look so fucking badass they look so thick that they can wrestle a bull and plus, they have magnificent beard.... Please, present-day Korean dudes, don't follow Japan's example of girly-looking guys. I'm so glad you folks still have an actual army.
Ioannesmartialis 5 months ago 2
Won Gyun, the Korean Ephialtes. If not for Yi Soo-shin's reinstatement in 1597, Chosun would have been doomed for sure due to his unnecessary blunders.
Daniel4646 6 months ago
WHAT MOVIE IS THIS?!
lompocus 1 year ago
@lompocus KBS TV Drama "불멸의 이순신" = "The Immortal Yi Soon Shin"
104 episodes.
mayo10er 6 months ago
@mayo10er is that the title of the movie / Drama series ?
AngusOnkel 2 months ago
oh ya at this time did the Ming took part in the imjin war ? and somehow to admiral yi remind me of someone ..... in china sry i keep on talking about china as i am a chinese
yichen100 1 year ago
@yichen100 The Ming Court also supplied some naval assets under one of their admirals (I'm away from my references at the moment, so I can't come up with the Chinese admiral's name). If I recall correctly, the Ming admiral was more conservative, much less aggressive than Admiral Yi Sun Shin, less aggressive than the Chinese generals sent down from the North after defeating the Ningxia rebels and the Jurchen to help Korea.
Kagetora2010 1 year ago
@Kagetora2010
Yes, Chen Lin : ) Actually the Jurchens wanted to help Korea btw, but Korea resisted to not break friendship with Ming.
Hanul91 1 year ago
why the Japs dont have cannon, musket was unable to destroyed warship
T1000579 2 years ago
Japanese did have cannons but (a) their ships were not built strong enough to support them and (b) their cannon range was notably shorter than the korean ones
steadyjimmy 2 years ago
@steadyjimmy why was that so ? are the japan poor or is there something wrong with japan
yichen100 1 year ago
@yichen100 Real life isn't age of empires where you collect gold and magically create military units.
KoreaEatCat 1 year ago
@KoreaEatCat ohh thanks
yichen100 1 year ago
@yichen100 Not so much poor/unable to afford cannon as it was Japan's rugged, mountainous geography that hindered the development of cannon. Cannon of the period were heavy, clumsy, needed strong draft animals and good roads to move them around. Japan is mountainous, had few good roads, the limited arable land meant limited ability to raise and maintain large draft animals in large numbers. Japanese warfare evolved accordingly, and they simply took what they knew along with them to Korea.
Kagetora2010 1 year ago
@T1000579 Japanese naval warfare was like earlier European naval warfare; ships were fighting platforms for foot soldiers to fight from and across. See my remarks re: why little or no Japanese cannon.
Kagetora2010 1 year ago
단지 드라마 불멸의 이순신에게 유감인건 원균을 왜 용장으로 묘사했는지? 원균은 단지 이순신 뒤에 따라만다니다가 전투가 끝나면 뒤에 남아 수급만 챙긴 무능력한 겁장이었을뿐...
90killerjoe 2 years ago
man... reckless = casualties. all said
crazykorean2268 2 years ago
You have noooo idea.... each faction regarded the other generally with a degree of contempt(!), and tended to fight recklessly as a result (at least at first).... plus one must remember that the Japanese had just finished a civil war that had lasted over 200 years! The samural and their ashigaru footsoldiers were all generally combat-hardened professionals, more so than the Koreans, as were the Ming Chinese who came to Korea's aid. Think of it as a three-way trainwreck...
Kagetora2010 2 years ago
@Kagetora2010 this is prolly one of the only unbiased comments ive seen on a korean video haha
xenohuh7 1 year ago
@crazykorean2268 And light or no armor vs. armor as standard AND arquebuses in large numbers = heavier casualties for the poor sods without the armor or muskets charging in tight masses armed only with spears or halberds. >;p
Kagetora2010 1 year ago