Easter Debate part 10 " Did Jesus rise from the dead" MrIslam Vs David Wood

[sweetieiman]

mashaallah i really enjoyed this videos.i was not even able to comment between them. now that we all saw the complete videos these brings all of us to 1 point.ISNT CHRISTIANITY CONTRADICTING THEIR SELF TELLING JESUS IS GOD? all what this christian repeater did was BRINGING ALL OF US TO BELIEVE THE IDEA OF JESUS "GOD" IN CHRISTIANITY IS WRONG. clearly he said jesus asked GOD. jesus "died" and as we all know GOD CANT DIE BECAUSE IS NOT A HUMAN.. jazakallah khairan 4 the videos Allah bless u amin

[Paakmslm]

@MrIslamAnswersback

I read Matthew Henry's bible commentary on 1 Corinthians 15:35-50 from christnotes(dot)org. A part of the commentary states "The bodies of the saints, when they rise again, will be changed. They will be then glorious and SPIRITUAL BODIES, fitted to the heavenly world and state, where they are ever afterwards to dwell." Coffman's commentary from searchgodsword(dot)org clearly states that it's a spiritual body in verse 44. Biblical commentators supports your argument. Salam

[ARMYofJESUSisISLAM]

I really love that part: Jesus sign is meant to be the sign of jonah and jonah never died hence jesus said he will be like jonah..lol Allahu akabr

[utubevideniskey]

The question we must ask is: Do we follow historians and what they say or Jesus (pbuh) the prophet of God?

Think about that!

[TheMuslimahSouljette]

Masha'Allah brother, that ws one wicked debate. You handled him very well && killed him in all spheres of the arguement! Masha'Allah, well done.

Jazaka'Allah khair for the upload && jazaka'Allah khair for the debate.

Salamu 'Alaikum.

[Madjudeen]

I would say shadir did a good job presenting his views. I find it sad the christian guy does not try to refute scripture but constantly trys to go back to his credentials. Which to me doesnt help his side. I think that this debate gave a new insight into easter.

[iPodsByIbrahim]

Very well spoken I think we should have more debates like this instead of cursing one another or fighting over religion these debates are very good and think Muslims and Christians can both settle their differences this way.

[oombuddah]

Sign Of Jonah - 3 d and 3 n IN THE BELLY OF THE WHALE..3 days and 3 nights in THE HEART OF THE EARTH (this is clearly referring to the TOMB burial place), so any other statement like how David Wood tries to explain is totally ambigious.

There are no eye-witness accounts at all. So all people believe others by word of mouth.

Which writer was there when Mary went to annoint Jesus?

[89naye]

@oombuddah

No eyewitness accounts, and who was there when Mary anointed Jesus?

The Apostle John, Mary his mother, his mothers sister, and Mary Magdalene (John 19:25-27)

And Mary didnt anoint Jesus body after he died, Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus anointed his body and wrapped it in cloth.

[anji0san]

David Wood is a great liar

[ericcruzstealth]

mr woods is saying that the jews said he appeared as a ghost because up until then they thought that resurrection would happen at the end of times if i'm not mistaken mr islam.

[DarthSerious69]

I just viewed all 10 parts to this debate. Both sides made some good arguments. When I watch videos like this I am reminded how little I know of the bible. Yet you quoted scripture better than the Christian. We Christians don't read the bible we read the bulletin. I look forward to listening to you on Paltalk

[hopehope321]

yet this is what they preach tothe people the truth is not shown to the followers of christianity

[hopehope321]

david has been looking in the wrong place, he is saying that a large number historical jeasus scholars say that " they all agree that jeasus did die by cruxerfiction" not true i know of a christian who studied christianity at harvard for 4 years and was a reguler preacher,he later converted because when you begin to look at history he said you begin to see that there possibility of jeasus death is small.

[sucambo]

salam wa aleykom brother islam...I watch the full debate...Maaannn you debunked him...I mean riped him...he couldn't speak the last 5 minutes...

[Tchado1000]

David is moron , there are 8 different places in the bible where God/Jesus DECEIVE people , so if you call what Allah did bad theology , I think he needs to check out his own bible.

And "why sacrifice the clear for the unclear" , I agree with David if we are dealing with just any book , but since we are dealing with books that claim to be from god , its a different matter , if there is an unclear contradiction in a book of god , then its not a book of god !!

[aboewaleed]

mashAllah! good!

[abushtayyah]

Mr Wood I like what u said "never sacrifise the clear for the sake of unclear"

Lets apply this statement to Jesus who was pure and clean, good and brought Justice. Why in the world would God torture his own son according to ur believe to save the fulthy killers, Rapers, thieves, and all the corupted people?!

Once again u are going against ur own book with ur statement.

Ur own Bible contredict in so many places not according to Islam but to ur own Book,if u can't see it that is very ignorant

[abushtayyah]

0:50 david still thinks there is no problem here and again deep into his own lies even if it goes against the Bible and what the decibles saw and witness and what clerly said they thought he was a ghost.

Mr, Wood no matter how hard u try u can't get around facts from ur own book writters. Either you believe or we go with your own interputation which contredict with the Bible, SORRY u can't have it both way, you must be a good student of Paul.

Mr. Islam great job my brother best I watch 4 u.

[SUSTAIN22]

once again they are going by history and not by what is written in books which are your own books. Bad theology he says but speaks of f Christian & Jewish theology.

[born2leader]

Islam fastest growing RELIGION on the face of the earth...MUHAMMMED(pbuh) was the last messenger of ALLAH like the other prophets adam noah abraham ect......I suggest christians to read both books the quran n bible 2gheter...

[hockeytown68]

Your making a good case for Christianity and what being a Christian is! I wish you the BEST in LIFE but do yourself a favor, do your research and study somemore. This might take Many Many Years i am AFRAID for you. I actaully kinda feel sorry for you in a humanity kinda way. You looked like a deer caught on the head lights of a Big Mack Truck..

[ryukenb2k]

Dude what is your true purpose on this page?you congratulate mr.woodsthen insult him?are you a christian or a devils advocate,because it seems you are displaying characteristics of the later

[Nakdimon316]

Shadeed is totally making stuff up. The disciples didn't think that Yeshua had a spiritual body, they thought that he was a SPIRIT. Yeshua then assures them that he was not a spirit, since a spirit doesn't have flesh and bones. So there was no contradiction there. Also, in the previous video he was making things up again. He read from Acts 5:30 and 10:39 accusing Paul of things. But those verses have nothing to do with Paul, that was PETER speaking. And there are more things he made up!

[MrIslamAnswersback]

Your the one making things up. And your silly play argument about a spiritual body or spirit is so lame.

[myrmecia1977]

Of course only a fool would claim jesus came back from the dead. And only an utter fool would claim mo (mbmafhf) (may black men ass fuck him forever) had a horse that could fly.

[seferovic92]

Salam bro. Bro 4 real you POWNED that MAN! dude it`s been a LOOOOONG time ago I have see`n a Muslim Pown a Christian in a debate SOOOOOOOOO HARD!

MashaAllah=)

[libya7]

Well done brother Shadid Lewis, this debate is the best refuting the crucifixion of Jesus.

You Won By Far,,,

Well done And Keep it Up

[cfrb]

actually god works Mashallah.. this is the best debate I have seen on refuting the crucifixion of Jesus.. I have seen Shabbir Ally and many others strugle in this topic.

[ufbret]

The Quran says that the books of Moses, the Psalms, and the gospel were all given by God.

Sura 2:87

4:163

3:3

When Muhammed (570 - 632) was alive, he claimed to receive the revelation of the Qu'ran from Allah. This means that at that time, the Bible which was in existence, could not have been corrupted because the Qu'ran states that God's word cannot be corrupted.

6:34

6:115

10:64

[MrIslamAnswersback]

Those verses are referring to the Quran as Gods word that cannot be corrupted. It does not mean that the bible at that time was not corrupted, because the Quran already it was corrupted in Quran 2:75, Quran 2:79, Quran 3:77.

And again, YOUR OFF TOPIC. What does this have to do with the issue of the DEBATE in the Video??? NOTHING!!!!!

[dreadedqb]

you realize that the word given is in Past tense?

[FuckMuslimNiggers]

who is the lier? Muslims!!!

Thats right. Muslim allow to lie in islam which is called taqyia.

watch?v=qJB0cO4S9c0&feature=re­lated

this video have opened my eyes of how filthy muslim Legally LYING to Spread Islam in the west.

"Produce your proof if ye are truthful." (2:111)

I DARE YOU IF MADE A VIDEO RESPONSE TO THIS VIDEO BEACUSE YOU CANT.

YOU CANT TELL YOUR MUSLIM BUDDIES THAT ROBERT AND WALID ARE NOT THE LIERS. ITS YOU!!! AND YOUR FILTHY REALIGION.

[MrIslamAnswersback]

Who is the liar?! Its you, look at your vulgar racist screen name. Its funny how you have the nerve to talk about Muslims and islam being evil, yet you have chosen to make a name with a vulgar curse word and racist insult in your screen name. So look at yourself you hate filled coward, You are the filth, you White racist devil dirt bag!!!!

[MrIslamAnswersback]

And now your Block, I mean come on your name is FuckMuslimNiggers, and your saying muslims are evil??! Would jesus create a name called FuckMuslimsNiggers?? I mean, wow you dont see the evil and racism and hatred in thename you chose for yourself?? The Devil is clearly of friend of yours and has blinded you to your own evil. Again, your a PUNK WHITE RACIST DEVIL!!! Stay off my videos !!!

[mustafagtgt]

Never sacrifice good history for bad theology....in that case we should apply the natrualistic reasoning on what actualy took place with jesus (pbuh)! He died...AND NEVER ressurected.

Mr David you are an idiot.

[purpleheed]

2 men arguing about what they will never know,just guessing and speculating about something that has no significance to where the world and all it's people are heading.

[ufbret]

I am curious, Mr Islam, of your defense of the Al-Isra. Using your logic, the event isnt viable since there was no one recording the event at the time. Likewise, using your logic that Josephus was getting his story from Christians (which you do not know as fact and can not prove is true), then how could the night journey have occured since there was only one muslim reporting it, Muhammad himself. When he relayed the story (as the only witness)tell us how the Quraysh reseponded?

[Gabriel3225]

We'll Muhammad never benn to Jerusalem and he was asked about it's features in detail and he answered with remarable detail . His proof was his knowledge of Jerusalem Sir

[ufbret]

Gabriel

Muhammad detailed the mosque but this was all accoring to HIS own writing. According to MrIslam, you need eyewitness to verify that it actually occured. There is no one else other than Muhammed who supposedly witnessed the Al-Isra. In fact, many Quraysh left the prophets teaching when he told of the night journey. I would also ask, was this a jounrey of the body or the soul?

[telur2606]

Well, even the Muslims at that time did not believe Muhammad regarding Al-Isra, which was why Muhammad honored his friend Abu Bakr so much and gave him the title As-Siddiq, the one who acknowledges the truth, because Abu Bakr believed it without any proof. Until of course, Muhammad said so-and-so caravan would reach Mecca at so-and-so time, because he saw those caravans while he was flying past them on the way to and back from Jerusalem.

[MrIslamAnswersback]

The topic is not the night journey, so what are you bringing it up for??? Trying to introduce an irrelevant subject that has nothing to do with the topic of this debate , just shows you cant defend the point. So you have to try and switch it around and make an issue of the night journey, which is not the question of this debate.

[ufbret]

No sir, I am just using your illogical premise that because of no eyewitness reports, Jesus' ressurection couldnt be real. This isnt a red herring. I illustrate the night journey as an example of your failed logic. What ancient writing was EVER written in the form of an eyewitness account?

[MrIslamAnswersback]

And NO historical document outside of what christians wrote, says jesus rose from the dead. NOT ONE.

[ufbret]

Again, using your logic, since no one ever wrote about Muhammed being the messenger of Allah, EXCEPT Muhammed and muslims then its impossible for him to be anthing but an ordinary war monger, who came to power by battle after battle.

[MrIslamAnswersback]

Again the topic is not muhammad, so your just using this as an opportunity to attack him, while not addressing the issue of the debate in the video, therefore, your an ordinary hate monger, and bigot.

[Nakdimon316]

LOL, look at the double standards. This guy uses the argument that there is not one document document that says that Yeshua rose from the dead, so therefore, we should reject that claim. But NOTICE THE DOUBLE STANDARDS: There are historical documents that say that Yeshua DIED ON THE CROSS, yet Shadeed dismisses those. Lets use your rhetoric: There is no historical data that Muhammad ever existed outside of the Muslim documents. So, using your logic, therefore....

[MrIslamAnswersback]

That debate was not about muhammad, and my opponent was the one who was resting his every argument on so called historical proof which there is no such historical proof. So look at your silly standards. LOL

[ufbret]

You are usisng a 21st century writing technique and placing into history two thousand years ago. Of course, unlike the writings of Muhammad, whose source was from one man, there are many extrabiblical references to Jesus, for example Josephus.

[MrIslamAnswersback]

I refuted the josephus claim in this debate. Josephus writing about jesus have been shown to be fabricated, and historians clearly admit Josephus wrote from HEARSAY, he was not an eye witness, so sorry, that does'nt hold up.

[Nakdimon316]

Well your Josephus argument, just like all others, were historically incorrect! ( what do muslims have against history?) scholars despute that Josephus wrote that Yeshua was the Messiah and that he rose from the dead. But NOT the statement that he was put to death under pontius Pilate. So go do your himework. You rely on one lone scholar and just disregard the consensus amongst the major scholars. I mean compare Bagent against Ehrman, Crossan, Ludeman, Lapide, Habermas, etc. Need i say more?

[MrIslamAnswersback]

We have nothing against history. And your wrong , they say evidence is there that Josephus never mentioned it at all. And erhaman himself has debated against Jesus death and resurrection , so why you included him as one in favor of it,is strange. So do your homework and let go of your christian theology and myths.

[Nakdimon316]

Ehrman NEVER debated against the cruficixion. He debated against the resurrection. The reason why I quoted Ehrman is because muslims like to quote him against us. But the fact is that there is no reputable historian that denies the crucifixion of Yeshua, as David had already pointed out in the debate. Yet you just dont want to listen. Because Islam tells you not to, that's why. All these people that I put in the post are superior scholars to lil ol' Bagent.

[MrIslamAnswersback]

What reputable historians?? Name me one NON christian reputable historian that says jesus was crucified and rose from the dead. Plus you ignore jesus own words about the sign of Jonah. Its you who doesnt want tolisten because Christian manmade doctrine told you not to. Your instructed to just believe , regardless of what evidence is there.

[hockeytown68]

Mr Debate the Hate, i heard your debate and like Paltalk and Youtube viewers your looked upon as a Fraud and Lacking in your debate skills by your Muslim Brothers and Sisters and Christian Scholars.

[MrIslamAnswersback]

Cockeytown  your an ignorant bigot. Your a nobody. You haters are the ones with no debate skills whether on youtube or paltalk. As you see from the comment, my muslim brothers and sisters support me . So give it up .

[hockeytown68]

Lewis, the one thats a NO-BODY is the only who trys to twist Gods True Spoken word like yourself. Look at yourself in the Mirror Lewis. You seriously look like the NO-BODY right about now. David Wood made you look like a desperate little silly punk!

[MrIslamAnswersback]

Oh please , now your a righteous christian who knows Gods true word?!! When did that happen? Most of the time your on pal talk spewing your low life bigotry, and you got the nerve to talk about twisting Gods true word. If your an example of what is supposed to be Gods true word, then it is truly sorry. But the fact is your not, your just a bitter anglo amerikkkan bigot! Take a hike loser!

[logictalk]

@MrIslamAnswersback

I have forwred all of this debate to faceBook for more people so see what kind of scholar you are.

Mr. Wood couldn't escape from the main point The sign of Jonnah, and assuring his followers that is me not a ghost. was not raised as a spirit.

May Allah be with you, you are to the point not a twisting fact Mr. Wood.

[Nakdimon316]

LOL, look at the double standards. This guy uses the argument that there is not one document document that says that Yeshua rose from the dead, so therefore, we should reject that claim. But NOTICE THE DOUBLE STANDARDS: There are historical documents that say that Yeshua DIED ON THE CROSS, yet Shadeed dismisses those. Lets use your rhetoric: There is no historical data that Muhammad ever existed outside of the Muslim documents. So, using your logic, therefore....

[tolerancelastic]

Christians should concede the fact that there is NOTHING miraculous about the time factor in the sign of Jonah. The miracle or sign is that Jonah was ALIVE. THAT is the miracle. So, when Jesus says he will be like Jonah, he is surely referring to Jonah's state in the whale's belly.

[xiaahmad]

Salam

Brother kindly see the video on Ibn-Masud

watch?v=W08vknJ_X_U

[AufenDuef]

since the Quran says that Jesus' death was "made to appear so", the very fact that historians think he died is proof that the Quran may be right (such a statement does not contradict history, though does not provide ultimate proof to non believers), if God made it to appear so how would anyone know the truth at the time? as in islam we believe that it was a miracle that Jesus was taken up body and soul, such miracles cannot fully be explained through historical evidence.

[webdawah]

Great! Very well done. You should do this more often.

[thisisreallypathetic]

Do you really think this was well done? It was a complete distortion and misrepresentation of what the Bible says about "the sign of Jonah". That doesn't bother you? Don't you really mean he supported your cause? The argumentation was terrible. He kept saying "as Jonah was...". Well, as Jonah was what? " Three days and three nights in the belly of the fish...". It seems that you guys intentionally misrepresent others and then congratulate ourselves. This is really pathetic. Pitiful.

[webdawah]

So, please tell us how the sign of Jonah correlates as the Christian story of Jesus.

[thisisreallypathetic]

Gladly, Jesus said "as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the fish so shall the Son of Man be three nights in the heart of the earth." I think anyone who reads this can clearly see this. The exception would be someone who is either dishonest or unintelligent. I don't think Mr. Lewis is that unintelligent. However, you just can't help but question his honesty. Why don't you describe in your own words the meaning of the above quotation. Isn't it really clear? Yes it is.

[webdawah]

Can you help with the math? Crucifixion on friday evening, and resurrection on sunday morning. That's not three days and three nights.

[thisisreallypathetic]

I understand why that seems strange. It has to do with the way the Jews count a day. However, my problem is with Mr. Lewis's continued repetition of very bad distortions of the text. Your question is valid. His assertion is invalid and dishonest. When he says, "as Jesus was..." repeatedly and then tries to make the illogical connection to Jonah being alive after the fish, well that is just really inexcusable. There are a lot of good Muslim apologist, but this is not one of them. True.

[webdawah]

I do believe that his argument is valid. The word "as" in this context could mean time spent, or state the individual is in. So, I don't think he was off course.

[thisisreallypathetic]

I will try again. Jesus said... what? What is the clear meaning? If you can read and have a grammar school education you can understand this. I'm not being critical of you or anyone else. "As Jonah was three days..." and so forth. Not just "as Jonah was". Otherwise "as Jonah was "thrown overboard in the ocean so will Jesus be thrown in the ocean"? Is that what the broad teaching is? I can understand you. Can you understand me? It's really not difficult. Unless you have an agenda.

[webdawah]

"for just as JONAH WAS THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS IN THE BELLY OF THE SEA MONSTER, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."(Mat 12:40)

This is what I read, and the two possibilities can be applied... time reference and state. Especially as we know that Jonah was alive. Imagine hearing this as a contemporary of Jesus and knowing that Jonah did not die. What will you think?

[thisisreallypathetic]

Okay, I accept that you're honest. You have posted the text. Now, I will start the verse and you tell me the next word, "as Jonah was..." three days, correct? Three days. Why is that hard to understand? The number three is what is being emphasized. Not, "as Jonah was thinking about a hamburger so I will be thinking about a hamburger...". If you really can't see it then maybe it's a problem of comprehension. I am not being disrespectful. We all have our strengths and weaknesses.

[webdawah]

I think I have presented my argument well enough. Whether "three" is the emphasis or understanding of the statement in context is what it is, I as a Muslim still have two reasons to doubt. The time reference and state do not match the reality of what the Bible says.

[thisisreallypathetic]

I don't see how this can be misunderstood but I can accept the fact that you don't understand. The time reference matches exactly. The state was never intended to match. If you want to force that you are misusing the rules of grammar (which I believe you're not doing intentionally). If I misunderstand what your scripture says and I force a false conclusion upon you will you disregard the clear meaning of your text? You would know better. Same here. I know better. Have a good night.

[MrIslamAnswersback]

The amount of days was not the sign as I showed Matthew 16:4 and Luke 11:29 does not mention any amount of days. If the days was important ,than it should have been stressed in these other places as well but it was'nt. Thus the amount of days was not the sign. Even further Mark 8:11,12 says NO SIGN SHALL BE GIVEN. Thus you have an even bigger problem.

[thisisreallypathetic]

That is a very weak reply. If you're saying because the "three days..." was not mentioned in the other accounts you have to extend that logic to your argument, which would be obliterated. Very inconsistent thinking here. You have an agenda and you are going to try to interpret anything anywhere to support your claims. You're missing the clear meaning of the text (or intentionally misusing it). Unbiased readers can see through this type of poor attempted scholarship.

[prplxty]

Again, there is nothing miraculous about a time factor. Jonah was ALIVE three days and three nights and Jesus was ALIVE "three days and three nights".

"After his suffering (passion), he showed himself to these men MANY convincing PROOFS that he was ALIVE." -Acts 1:3

Keywords: "proofs" (not possibilities) and "alive" (NOT ressurected).

Thank you.

[bazzpakhi]

۞ . لا اله الا الله محمد رسول الله.۞

[liquiduser]

mashaallah welldone brother :)

[dinokaiser]

Once again Bro, show me where Zeitgeist debunked has been debunked.

[thisisreallypathetic]

"38Then some of the Pharisees and teachers of the law said to him, "Teacher, we want to see a miraculous sign from you."39He answered, "A wicked and adulterous generation asks for a miraculous sign! But none will be given it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. 40For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." What was the sign of Jonah? Three days. I hope you will be honest about this

[thisisreallypathetic]

Does anyone really believe this diatribe? This would not convince a second-grade child. I challenge someone to post the entire Bible quotation for "the sign of Jonah". I'm sure someone will accept the challenge since all of you are very honest people. I will wait for the entire text to be posted. Then you tell in your own words what is being said. This should be really interesting. Remember, the entire text. Not a snippet or partial quotation. Let's see who is truthful here. Anyone?

[1MoreMuslim]

Christians want Jesus dead for all costs.

[adeelalam084]

lolllllllllllllllllllllllllll

[xXxAxBxZxXx]

lol you owned him dude lol

[xXxAxBxZxXx]

bro do you have the q&a?

[jaed123]

The Clapping says it all...Mashallah bro ..Awesome debate and convincingly won by our muslim brother..Mrislam

[xiaahmad]

some one should have tell that dude david that Deebate was about jesus rising frm DEAD too :D