@soundscape718 Why not blame it on a missile, then you have an excuse to go and bomb the crap out of some country you don't like. Its the wrong way around to be a conspiracy.
@soundscape718 - conspiracy theories are there to make money for the book publishers etc etc and for (as you say) lunatics to rant on........we are still getting conspiracy theories over here in the UK about Princess Diana's car crash in Paris 14yrs ago! they cant accept that it was an accident ! people are convinced that 2nd jet to slam into the WTC had something fitted to its undercarriage when in reality you can see its the 'belly' part of the jet where the tyres retract ! how dumb...........
I dont believe this. Look at who was on that plane, and what important roles they played. When the U.S. wants you dead, civilians are casualties of war, i feel very sory for the innocent people on this flight and their famlies. Rest in peace!
Jet fuel flash points vary greatly... TWA prob used type A.. with flash pt. of 38 degree C.with high end to 60 deg. C. Wonder what the flash point is for jet fuel made with 20% babassu and coconut used in a test flight by Virgin Atlantic in 2008.. Hmm
Wow also all the electric wiring was recovered and it was concluded to be not the cause of any spark.
There is an FBI video where some guy says "Man I wish Clinton would get off his ass and do something about this terrorism. FBI guy says, you can't say that....guy interuppts saying, this was DEFINITELY an outer explosion."
@JohnnieNaked This is the British version of the show. In Europe, they use Celsius temperatures. Therefore, your conspiracy FAILED because you don't know to recognize accents and measures used elsewhere.
@lotwyo The numbers I used were in celsius, numbnuts. I'm Canadian so we use celsius too. Look up the flashpoints for yourself before just assuming the other person is a complete idiot next time ok? It might save you some embarrassment.
What angers me is that: Why doesn't Airforce One have the same problems? HA!...All these accidents and cover ups are proof that the NTSB, CIA, FBI could care less about the public....I for one will NEVER ever believe a politician or government official....They're all nazi's in disguise.
These tragic accidents are not enough for some....they always have to make up 'it was a missile' and such and such...........funny how theres large amounts of people who rush to say " I saw this" etc etc....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
NTSB are a bunch of fucking liars i hope they burn in hell so their gonna say the witnesses didn't see anything. How come no one ever interviewed the military about why they were over there that night
A missile hit the plane on the outside. The Fuel wasn't hot enough to explode so a spark in the Center Wing Tank couldn't have caused it to explode, it was something external which had to be a missile. 739 people saw a bright flash indicating it was infact a missile.
739 people saw a plane explode. there is no evidence what they saw was a missile, and the only 2 photos that show a "missile" have been found to be either faked or are just mistaking other things for a missile
Yeah and I rather believe them over the government who wasn't there and disposed of all the physical evidence. Some of these witnesses aren't ordinary. There is one who was in the military with 25 years of experience and he knows it was a missile. The problem is all the physcial evidence is gone so there is nothing. Why was the FBI all over the crash site if terrorism had been ruled out. This was the job for the NTSB not the FBI. It was a missile so if you don't want to believe it it's your loss
but like i just said, there is no evidence of any missile. anyway there wasn't anything in the area that was capable of firing a missile at the plane, they even checked if any of the helicopters were in the area and they can't even fire missiles! also how would this one person in the military know if it was a missile if he hadn't seen any of the wreckage or the actual missile its self, just the explosion of the plane
Who the said the missile was launched from the air? It came from the ocean which meant a navy vessel must have did it by mistake or it had to be terrorism. Well the FBI disposed all the evidence to make it seem like there wasn't a missile present. You think they're going to leave evidence around like that? The streak of light everyone saw was a missile and I believe them over the gov't. The NTSB didn't even interview these witnesses, just shut them out because they think they know everything.
Yeah so you're taking their word for it. You don't know how many missiles they had or if any were missing. Ofcourse they're going to deny it, no one tells the truth anymore. There was a test performed with the jet fuel type used in TWA Flight 800 and a flame was lit and once it was dipped into the fuel the flame was put it out. No little spark could have caused an explosion and missile residue was all over the seats.
did you watch the video?? firstly it wasn't 'missile residue' it was traces of plastic exlosives which aren't used in missiles, and secondly it would be perfectly possible for the plane to continue to climb as the main fuselage and wings were still largely intact and the engines throttled up. why believe an illogical theory that the us government covered something up over the scenario that 20 year old wiring short circuited causing a spark, something that happens all the time?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Did you watch this video? - Silenced: TWA 800 and the Subversion of Justice. If you haven't I recommend you do because all that you are telling me are lies fed to you by the government. According to physics it is unlikely for an airplane to climb in altitude after a large explosion. The Center Wing Tank was the hottest part of the plane which is why the missile hit it in that spot. It was an easy target. This doesn't happen all the time are you nuts? The wiring was fine.
There was missing evidence that the FBI did not want us to see. Since criminal activity was ruled out why was the FBI needed in this investigation huh? They didn't even use any of the information the 739 witnesses provided. This was the job of the NTSB not the FBI. The fuel wasn't hot enough to explode from a small spark. They even used the excuse of the Wing tank being empty which meant there was oxygen in there but that's a lie too. This was a cover-up I suggest you accept it.
Like I said the fuel wasn't "hot" enough for a small eletrical spark to cause an explosion. Something happened externally. Also the evidence meaning pieces of the aircraft were tampered with and the pieces missing are the pieces with all the proof a missile hit the plane. An airplane can't ascend thousands of feet if it exploded. The NTSB said the plane lifted in altitude as soon as it exploded to explain the streak of light but there isn't enough kinetic energy for that to happen.
@soundscape718 Why not blame it on a missile, then you have an excuse to go and bomb the crap out of some country you don't like. Its the wrong way around to be a conspiracy.
steamgeezer 5 months ago
@steamgeezer You got that right! EXCELLENT point!
whatwouldjudydo 2 months ago
sticking a heat source underneath a fuel tank is a bad idea? OMG who'da thought...
DefenderofLindon 8 months ago
@soundscape718 - conspiracy theories are there to make money for the book publishers etc etc and for (as you say) lunatics to rant on........we are still getting conspiracy theories over here in the UK about Princess Diana's car crash in Paris 14yrs ago! they cant accept that it was an accident ! people are convinced that 2nd jet to slam into the WTC had something fitted to its undercarriage when in reality you can see its the 'belly' part of the jet where the tyres retract ! how dumb...........
garyj79 9 months ago
I dont believe this. Look at who was on that plane, and what important roles they played. When the U.S. wants you dead, civilians are casualties of war, i feel very sory for the innocent people on this flight and their famlies. Rest in peace!
jjlarson74 11 months ago
you wont see me on no damn 747!!
wcbombers21 11 months ago
Wow, you really have to admire the pilots of that test flight! Talk about iron balls!!!
md65000 1 year ago
I was on a TWA flight from JFK to France just 3 weeks before. It might have been the same plane.
closedcircle1 1 year ago
Jet fuel flash points vary greatly... TWA prob used type A.. with flash pt. of 38 degree C.with high end to 60 deg. C. Wonder what the flash point is for jet fuel made with 20% babassu and coconut used in a test flight by Virgin Atlantic in 2008.. Hmm
suelizjohnson 1 year ago
Wow also all the electric wiring was recovered and it was concluded to be not the cause of any spark.
There is an FBI video where some guy says "Man I wish Clinton would get off his ass and do something about this terrorism. FBI guy says, you can't say that....guy interuppts saying, this was DEFINITELY an outer explosion."
Also 96 witnesses said they saw a missile.
JohnnieNaked 2 years ago
They're saying the flash point of jet fuel is 36 degrees celsius!? They're fucked. It's over 60.
JohnnieNaked 2 years ago
@JohnnieNaked lol Yeah Haha 36 lol In that case there probably should be Ice cubes in the tank as a safety measure.
MrJackanthony 1 year ago
@JohnnieNaked This is the British version of the show. In Europe, they use Celsius temperatures. Therefore, your conspiracy FAILED because you don't know to recognize accents and measures used elsewhere.
lotwyo 1 year ago
@lotwyo The numbers I used were in celsius, numbnuts. I'm Canadian so we use celsius too. Look up the flashpoints for yourself before just assuming the other person is a complete idiot next time ok? It might save you some embarrassment.
JohnnieNaked 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What angers me is that: Why doesn't Airforce One have the same problems? HA!...All these accidents and cover ups are proof that the NTSB, CIA, FBI could care less about the public....I for one will NEVER ever believe a politician or government official....They're all nazi's in disguise.
xxchinookxx 2 years ago
The investigators figured this out are true geniuses. These guys are experts in the true sense of the word.
bellaggio1770 2 years ago 8
These tragic accidents are not enough for some....they always have to make up 'it was a missile' and such and such...........funny how theres large amounts of people who rush to say " I saw this" etc etc....
garyj79 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NTSB are a bunch of fucking liars i hope they burn in hell so their gonna say the witnesses didn't see anything. How come no one ever interviewed the military about why they were over there that night
godzilla1234567890 3 years ago
how do you think the plane exploded then?
mr2Dmancowmoothing 2 years ago
A missile hit the plane on the outside. The Fuel wasn't hot enough to explode so a spark in the Center Wing Tank couldn't have caused it to explode, it was something external which had to be a missile. 739 people saw a bright flash indicating it was infact a missile.
godzilla1234567890 2 years ago
739 people saw a plane explode. there is no evidence what they saw was a missile, and the only 2 photos that show a "missile" have been found to be either faked or are just mistaking other things for a missile
mr2Dmancowmoothing 2 years ago
Yeah and I rather believe them over the government who wasn't there and disposed of all the physical evidence. Some of these witnesses aren't ordinary. There is one who was in the military with 25 years of experience and he knows it was a missile. The problem is all the physcial evidence is gone so there is nothing. Why was the FBI all over the crash site if terrorism had been ruled out. This was the job for the NTSB not the FBI. It was a missile so if you don't want to believe it it's your loss
godzilla1234567890 2 years ago
but like i just said, there is no evidence of any missile. anyway there wasn't anything in the area that was capable of firing a missile at the plane, they even checked if any of the helicopters were in the area and they can't even fire missiles! also how would this one person in the military know if it was a missile if he hadn't seen any of the wreckage or the actual missile its self, just the explosion of the plane
mr2Dmancowmoothing 2 years ago
Who the said the missile was launched from the air? It came from the ocean which meant a navy vessel must have did it by mistake or it had to be terrorism. Well the FBI disposed all the evidence to make it seem like there wasn't a missile present. You think they're going to leave evidence around like that? The streak of light everyone saw was a missile and I believe them over the gov't. The NTSB didn't even interview these witnesses, just shut them out because they think they know everything.
godzilla1234567890 2 years ago
They checked all the navy vessels, and they had the correct amount of missiles still inside, therefore non of the missiles had been shot
mr2Dmancowmoothing 2 years ago
Yeah so you're taking their word for it. You don't know how many missiles they had or if any were missing. Ofcourse they're going to deny it, no one tells the truth anymore. There was a test performed with the jet fuel type used in TWA Flight 800 and a flame was lit and once it was dipped into the fuel the flame was put it out. No little spark could have caused an explosion and missile residue was all over the seats.
godzilla1234567890 2 years ago
like i said earlier, weren't you watching the video? they heat up the fuel like it would be in the plane and it explodes.
mr2Dmancowmoothing 2 years ago
did you watch the video?? firstly it wasn't 'missile residue' it was traces of plastic exlosives which aren't used in missiles, and secondly it would be perfectly possible for the plane to continue to climb as the main fuselage and wings were still largely intact and the engines throttled up. why believe an illogical theory that the us government covered something up over the scenario that 20 year old wiring short circuited causing a spark, something that happens all the time?
BillyHerbie 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Did you watch this video? - Silenced: TWA 800 and the Subversion of Justice. If you haven't I recommend you do because all that you are telling me are lies fed to you by the government. According to physics it is unlikely for an airplane to climb in altitude after a large explosion. The Center Wing Tank was the hottest part of the plane which is why the missile hit it in that spot. It was an easy target. This doesn't happen all the time are you nuts? The wiring was fine.
godzilla1234567890 2 years ago
There was missing evidence that the FBI did not want us to see. Since criminal activity was ruled out why was the FBI needed in this investigation huh? They didn't even use any of the information the 739 witnesses provided. This was the job of the NTSB not the FBI. The fuel wasn't hot enough to explode from a small spark. They even used the excuse of the Wing tank being empty which meant there was oxygen in there but that's a lie too. This was a cover-up I suggest you accept it.
godzilla1234567890 2 years ago
@BillyHerbie Yeah well either way the fact remains that both of them could happen again
MrJackanthony 1 year ago
Like I said the fuel wasn't "hot" enough for a small eletrical spark to cause an explosion. Something happened externally. Also the evidence meaning pieces of the aircraft were tampered with and the pieces missing are the pieces with all the proof a missile hit the plane. An airplane can't ascend thousands of feet if it exploded. The NTSB said the plane lifted in altitude as soon as it exploded to explain the streak of light but there isn't enough kinetic energy for that to happen.
godzilla1234567890 2 years ago
it was hot enough, we're you watching the video??
mr2Dmancowmoothing 2 years ago