I feel like something is going to explode... this means that this is an awesome recording... filled with life and power.... no one can play like gilels...
I check NASA's astronomy picture of the day every day so I appreciate the visuals of the sun. They are perfectly in phase with Gilels amazing playing.
Appassionata here is a storm, a hurricane. This is impossible playing that would have amazed Beethoven and would have driven him into a whole new world of nature and composition
@flippert0 Yes, the later version might be closer to the score. I am an actor and I admire the truely titanic manner how he involves his personality in a co-genial manner and reveals fresh aspects in the almost too famous piece. My wife, a professional pianist, considers that it is perfectly adequate to treat a score in such a manner: Gilels has something to say, he is human & emotional and thereby modern, we assume that in e.g. in 200 years his value will even be more appreciated.
Thanks for posting! I agree: this is a bit "furious." How he could fail to miss a note is anyone's guess. A demigod, Gilels is. Still, I might prefer Arrau's interpretation, despite being 80 at the time. He mines a lot more emotion. Pollini's is spot-on, too. Try them. This is just too off-to-the-races for me. I still hail Gilel's interpretation of the 3rd mov. of the Waldstein, though. None better up here that I've heard...
@rationalheretic I already included in the comments a reference to Gilels version lasting 7:52 which is indeed closer to the intentions of Beethoven´s score, however Iam not aware of any pianist using the instrument with such a determined energy at such a technically and musically high level, the genius of Gilels transformed the piece in a cogenial manner. Thanks for confirming the methaphor.
I feel like something is going to explode... this means that this is an awesome recording... filled with life and power.... no one can play like gilels...
DanielPianoForever 3 weeks ago
Many consider Gilels to be the best performer of the Beethoven sonatas.
3001st 2 months ago
I check NASA's astronomy picture of the day every day so I appreciate the visuals of the sun. They are perfectly in phase with Gilels amazing playing.
Raedwulf12 3 months ago
Appassionata here is a storm, a hurricane. This is impossible playing that would have amazed Beethoven and would have driven him into a whole new world of nature and composition
Raedwulf12 3 months ago
thanx
koncod 5 months ago
@flippert0 Yes, the later version might be closer to the score. I am an actor and I admire the truely titanic manner how he involves his personality in a co-genial manner and reveals fresh aspects in the almost too famous piece. My wife, a professional pianist, considers that it is perfectly adequate to treat a score in such a manner: Gilels has something to say, he is human & emotional and thereby modern, we assume that in e.g. in 200 years his value will even be more appreciated.
artsloving 10 months ago
Respond to this video...
KelwinDicks666 11 months ago
fantastic music!!!!
Gilels is an excellent player......
images are very good!
TitaniaNil 1 year ago
Thanks for posting! I agree: this is a bit "furious." How he could fail to miss a note is anyone's guess. A demigod, Gilels is. Still, I might prefer Arrau's interpretation, despite being 80 at the time. He mines a lot more emotion. Pollini's is spot-on, too. Try them. This is just too off-to-the-races for me. I still hail Gilel's interpretation of the 3rd mov. of the Waldstein, though. None better up here that I've heard...
Sleighteem 1 year ago
nice of you to upload this, deserves more views
mistakenshyness 1 year ago
@rationalheretic I already included in the comments a reference to Gilels version lasting 7:52 which is indeed closer to the intentions of Beethoven´s score, however Iam not aware of any pianist using the instrument with such a determined energy at such a technically and musically high level, the genius of Gilels transformed the piece in a cogenial manner. Thanks for confirming the methaphor.
artsloving 1 year ago