chromosome answer as i'd imagine: the species that gave birth to the first 46-chromosome creature did not necessarily have to have 46 chromosomes itself. their reproductive cells need to carry those genes. reproductive cells reproduce by copying themselves and multiplying. its likely there were many 46 chromosome offspring coming from the same parent.
Hard to find the concrete questions but here is my answers.
1: Impossible for herbivores to make all primates extinct even without carnivores.
2: I don't know happens if a person with this fusion mates with an without it. Non of your examples discussed this scenario which you draw conclusion on.
3: Through small changes. Some of the scenarios I could quickly think of some possible ways some not. Proving it to be impossible for them to evolve into that state is a lot harder then you think.
After devouring quite a number of birds, one crocodile realised how useful they are to clean their teeth. Other crocodiles saw it and copied the pattern. That is how humans learn face expressions, body language, etc.
There is actually no such thing as a perfect balance, you're right about that, that is impossible. But you see, there is a single species that is takng over the planet: the human.
It IS possible for creatures with different cromosomes to procreate under certain circumstances. And if the newborn do not have 64 cromosomes, they have the data in their DNA, which makes it possible for their children to have 64 cromosomes.
1) Your question is meandering and poorly thought out and displays a lamentable ignorance of basic biology or even ecology. In ecological systems we see what happens when predators over eat, they starve. This reduces the number of predators and allows the prey to recover. Or it could be disease from over population that thins out the numbers. Equilibrium occurs when balance is achieved though it seems to be a shifting equilibrium as conditions change.
I respect the fact that you question things. Always trying to see the logic behind it. But still for some extremely odd reason you believe in a god? It seems to me that you were brought up with a religion and that you decided to be one with it even tho it can never work with logic.
1 and 3. Equilibrium occurs because all life adapts to best suit it's environment. Very simple.
2. No 48 creature with 48 chromosomes ever gave birth to one with 46; the 24th pair is in the process of being gradually phased out. In fact, humanity's 2nd chromosome is a fusion of an ancestor's 2nd and 3rd, so homo sapien is what you might call a transitional state.
And the end of the video just made me sad. I seriously pity you, you dumb fuck.
Uhh wow okay, and Christians believe some random powerful magic dude who no one can even prove exsisted except in this "book" written several years after this person supposedly exsisted. That's more ridiculous than science, if you ask me. Christians are by far the ignorant ones not Atheists.
if u say god has created everything then who created god, he can't come from nothing surely, if he was created from nothing then isn't the argument against the big bang and the universe created from nothing then true. something must have come from nothing, oh yeah where does he hang out these days. sure i saw him in the chinese take away getting a number 26 and 43
The ultimate problem with attempting to answer these questions with actual scientific fact is that there are only two responses to be garnered from the one asking the question- they'll either have no idea what the hell you're talking about, or they'll claim that the submitted evidence is unproven. Either way, no answer is good enough for them.
There's no point in providing answers. We could be educating people who -aren't- hopeless causes.
Answer 1. Its called the balance of life and is how ecosystems work. All your postulations are just opinion with no factual backing, just opinion. Evolution is not random this is an ignorant interpretation of the theory. A organism evolves to exploit and fill a niche in nature. Overconsumption would eliminate the organism and niche besides all parties are actively evolving creating balance. Read more than quo-ran and you will be able to understand more.
atheists do not believe God exists, why would they care about being accountable to a non-existant God ? It would be like me worrying about the weed fairy hitting me with a shovel for cutting dandelions when I mow the lawn.
I admit it , my taste in sandwiches has evolved since I was a child. I developed a taste for less sweet and more tangy flavors.
bears haz fur. except Fuzzy Wuzzy. (< see if you get this reference)
I suggest going to the channel cdk007. It'll answer all your questions, even the origin of life from abiogenesis. Evolutionists can find explanations to back their side, and creationists can feel free to fight back!
You ask very interesting questions but got all the answers wrong. You're clearly a very curious young man and this curiosity is needed in the scientific community. Please look into these matters seriously, write an article, and try to get it published in a peer review journal. The nice thing about science is that the person with the best arguments/experiments/demonstrations wins! It's easy to say God is the answer to everything. Too easy.
If you could grasp simple scientific and evolutionary concepts as well as you can grasp your penis (you miss your holy scraps of paper as well) your head might pop out and you could do something useful with your life instead of pig fucking it away like this.
this is what happens when kids are raised being fed bs and being doctrinated to accepting what they are told. most people know how criminal minded psychotic religious people are. claiming how loving and caring they are towards those they torture or cripple with drugs. most scientists are religious and often use concepts or genetics as a shift of blame for the physical or chemical cruelty they commit to people. if not blaming god they say its genetics or the victims manifestd it onto themselves.
you really are stupid, that's why people call you that... if you haven't figured that out yet... just to let you know. I'm talking, like, extremely stupid haha.
This is alot more than 3 questions... cant possibly answer all them in a 500 character limit youtube comment. The internet can answer EVERY question you have brought up. Every single one.
Scientists don't accept new discoveries on a scale this large easily. They have scrutinized and debated evolution ever since Darwin came up with it.
Nothing you ask is a new question, and evolution would not be accepted if the scientists didn't deem counterarguments to these questions valid.
WTF is this guy even saying?!??! he says "mother nature" like its some disgusting fat rodent. PEOPLE don't waste ur energy writing paragraphs, cuz i'm sure that no matter what you believe, you don't get anything this guy is saying.
You fail at being an intelligent human. People like you are the reason the middle east is still a backward shithole, the West, East Asia etc. are in the 21st century. Muslims have contributed nothing positive to the world in the last 500 years. Because you read ONE book from the middle ages and think you know things...
re: #1 The first life was microscopic and it DID produce too much oxygen and result in mass extinction. It was good for organisms which could metabolise oxygen though.
Evolution occurred in "pockets" all over the world. In some places entire species DID die out due to overpredation. In other places they didn't.
But by and large, nature is an arms race. Predators evolve what they need in response to prey capability. They tend not to evolve more capability than needed because: It's not needed.
Oh for fuck sakes. Evolution is verifiable reality. If I wasn't willing to be accountable for my actions, I'd convince myself an invisible evil makes me do bad things, and an invisible magic scapegoat takes all my punishment.
Atheism is simply a lack of belief in the notion God exists. Nothing more. You cannot add other meanings to this to make a case....And as you failed 5 seconds into your video, you clearly have no credibility and I won't waste any more time
1. Evolution says that through the process of time, life, of its own accord mutates and adapts to its changing environment. Science says that anything left to itself over a period of time deteriorates. Example: erosion, desertification. Earth once was a tropical paradise.
2. If the earth's orbit was just 100 km's further away from the sun, we would all freeze to death, if it was just 100 km's closer to the sun we wouldn't be able to handle the heat.
now that random stuff you’re throwing around proves … well … what actually?
1 you’ve just proven how little you know about the subject: you take a biological statement, compare it to a physical (and quite specific) one, give a geological example for it and draw a biblical conclusion… that’s multi-level-bullshit.
2 and now you add cosmology and throw in Numbers, which are disproven by the mere existence of certain planets whitin our system.
@AxEnTiger No crap here but your ineffective attempt to disprove something by simply showing contempt. Your debating is quite poor. You can't deny it so you rubbish it. The B.S is coming from you.
@AxEnTiger I'm not going to take this any further with you because you are only interested in isolating things that are intrinsically interconnected. The geology of the earth is the infrastructure and environment for biology to be sustainable, the cosmology of our system is what keeps the geology of our planet in tact. Without our biology, the planet still exists, just look at the other planets around us. Without geology, our earth is nothing more than gas. Evolution is a lie.
@simkolkay Creation = the universe was created step by step into an intricately woven system of Galaxies and star systems, which house our solar system, which houses our Earth, which houses life on a terrestrial level.
Evolution = the universe suddenly came into being of its own accord and over billions of years somehow set it self up so that all the galaxies are fully functional and our own solar system works with clockwork precision randomly.. Ahh, No.
Please learn some quantum mechanics before you pretend that you know something about the origin of the universe.
Also, you clearly have not studied evolution since you think it has something to do with the origin of the universe. This means you are either extremely old, or just another god damn 13 year old kid. Come back when you finish high school.
@Madpolis7 Great work. Mock other people's comments without actually saying anything yourself. A typical evolutionist's response. I won't argue with you, there's no point in contending with willingly ignorant fools.
Willingly ignorant? Being willingly ignorant IS THE DEFINITION of creationism.
youtube.com/watch?v=FoZW7-3YSns
You are correct in saying there is no point in arguing with willingly ignorant fools, which is exactly why I didn't say anything. You clearly haven't studied evolution, so that means that you are young and haven't taken high school level biology yet, extremely old when they didn't teach evolution in schools, or you willingly failed that class in the name of your religion.
Ignore the statement about the hawks with poor eyesight dying, that was meant to be deleted. The hawks would die by eating the mice to the point where there were so few left that it couldn't sustain the hawks until they reproduced to a level to support their population again. The hawks who were more adapted to eat different foods would survive until they could hunt their pray of choice again.
Also the reason y herbivores/carnivores cant overtake each other is they evolved so they couldnt be taken over. Say there were hawks that fed off field mice. Their were 2 kinds of field mice, brown and white. In the summer the brown would survive from camouflage. The hawks with poor eyesight would die off as they can't find food, and the brown mice would live as the white mice were eaten. Opposite in the snow but then it didnt snow for a very long time in winter, the hawks eat all mice, and die.
To address the 3rd argument of (2nd in the video sorry, I mixed them up) of symbiosis is a faulty representation. They developed this relationship over time. I'm sure when crocodiles first go birds picking food out of their teeth they would snap their jaws shut, but over time they learned that they benefited off of this relationship. Relationships aren't pre-existing they are learned from relying on the other.
1. Oxygen being present in a compound wouldn't have destroyed the organisms as discussed. Because they're bonded with other atoms. It isn't pure oxygen anymore, it is a new molecule with oxygen in it. This is like asking, "If we breathe in oxygen, then why can't we breathe in water???" 2. The offspring would still be able to pro-create with its closest relatives but this would cause an even greater change to its off spring. How would you explain human engineered evolution..? Coincidence? lol
The problem with his claims are most of these things have in fact been answered and it is because of experiments and evidence that leads us to assume it. If evidence of the contrary arises then it is revised. If there is a lack of evidence it states it is not yet known. If one tries to explain it, it is a hypothesis which is then tested to verify, if the hypothesis is valid or not. Evolution has a lot more proof than Religion, as it can be repeated and observed. Religion can't be, sorry.
I thought this was quite funny. I thought the mindless evolutionary responses were even funnier. They all claimed that these things were easily explained but refused to offer an explanation - Just like the theory of evolution. It makes many claims but its explanations are woefull. When the greatest scientific mind of the modern era - Isaac Newton laughed at the plausibilty of evolution, Charles Darwin thought it was okay... and people believed him...
1: you realize that Newton died almost 100 years before Darwin was even born?
2: name one “easily explained” thing, which wasn’t explained.
3: as for the vid, I’ve answered those questions a while ago and even asked some myself, but the author never bothered to actually defend his position (which would be some what of a surprise).
@AxEnTiger I never implied that Darwin and Newton were of the same era, just that Newton's observations were scientific and form the basis of modern science. Darwin on the other hand made connections to things that he didn't really understand and his experiments with developing a higher order hum via inbreeding failed dismally. I used to be an evolutionist but the flaws and contradictory evidence made me look to creation because evolution is an impossibility - chaos produces more chaos.
You claim “Newton laughed at the plausibilty of evolution” without implying Newton ever heard of evolution?
You realize physics and biology are entirely different fields?
More over, do you realize that Newtons theory of gravitation (yes, it's allso “just a theory”) is proven wrong for quite some time now, while the theory of evolution remains the most supported one?
btw. how come you couldn't name ONE thing that'd be a problem for evolution?
@drijfkip1 Dude, unless you live here, you have no Idea how ass-backwards most of us Americans really are. It's sooooooooo embarrassing... Thank god for educated Europe!
Question 3: that's not even one single question. It's a lot of questions that are easily answered, but not like this. Get yourself some decent school books about evolutionary biology and such things are explained for even the numbest minds to understand.
Question 2: It's not like that... at ALL. Again it's trial and error. Several organisms have offspring with similar and compatible features, capabilities, physical specifications. Those that are favourable ensure reproduction with these very points. If they aren't favourable, they will cease to exist and to evolve.
Question 1: yes. But "random" and "accident" are very different things. It's like: you try to create a new food recipe. You start testing with several ingredients. First doesn't work... second neither... but then at some point, it's great, That's trial and error... that's random. But it's not an "accident". Same goes with evolution. Random? Yes. Accident? Not by far.
Willingly ignorant! ANYONE who read a book on evolution would understand how stupid these questions are. Go ask a biologist...! Or are you too scared you'll actually get the answers?
You know that this 'nearly impossible coincidence' of a creature with a different number of chromosomes happens regularly in humans? It's called Down's Syndrome. Do some research.
So did god miraculously make the koran? after he made the Bible? after he made the books of Zoroaster? after he made the Torah? or did a bunch of desert nobodies adapt previous works to fit into their modern eras? It is totally impossible for languages to change because we still use older version and anyone with common sense wouldn't believe that poppycock!
Question 1: Your assumption is wrong. The cambrian explosion was preceded by a mass extinction event. So NO not ballanced. AND plant eating organisms existed during the Edicaran period SO wrong again.
Question 2: Sometimes homozygotes produces hetrozygotes i.e. the offspring has one more chromosome. If two hetrozygotes reproduce, their offspring can become homozygotes but with one more chromosome than their parents.
Question 3: Yes? Coevolution exists... deal with it...
@pchtermino1 I agree, Creationism has it's pros and cons in the matter at hand, which is something that frustrates the intellectually curious over a number of hundreds of things. We're all aware of the 6 day creation story ( Jews/Christians/Muslims Yahweh/God/Allah rested at the 7th), but the curious scientific minds of today's society demands for details on the said event. Because of the lack of intellectual basis on the matters (which they dubbed it so for some reason) they went to evolution.
the basic idea of this is "if you dont understand something god did it," just because there may be some things which we do not yet (yet being the operative word, remember we used to think the world was flat until we discovered evidence to the contrary) understand doesnt mean we wont ever understand or work out why it happened, if everyone just accepted the idea that god made everything we would never learn anything.
BOOYAH!!! What do you say to that creationists? P.S. There is a lot people don't know that science is trying to find out. Because we find new things we learn from them. Open your eyes and move forward than follow rules set 2000 years ago.
#3 Ants probably started with the queen which bred workers. Now a brain may or may not have the ability to think. If it has then it needs to sleep or die of overusing. But worker ants don't sleep they just obey and protect their mother and brothers by building home. While for aligators it is known that because the aligators don't see what's in front of them, while lying like a log for a small critter, they bite only when they feel something touch their tongue(unless hunting) if we assume...
@goffygoober that the bird didn't touch the tongue and ate the leftovers on his teeth, that would explain the current "doctor birds". Now even when seeing them aligators don't mind them, because they are good for their teeth.
@goffygoober Oh and the fish thing is easy. Because other fish wanted to eat glassfish so the redmouthes protected their food source. Like humans used to offer some of them for protection by the "gods" so do the glassfish offer few of theirs for redmouth protection from other predators.
#2 When evolving we do not lose the traits we had from previous species. A human still has genetic potential to have a tail and chickens have genetic potential to have teeth. Through this we can assume that to survive the first creatures could have used their genetic potential to replcicate themselves, thus creating a second of that breed. Now this ability is dormant because it requires a lot of energy and has less genetic space to advance.
#1 Because there a lot of oxygen back then the first living organisms used it as fuel similar to us making fire. Later on when oxygen was depleting other organisms started taking energy from the sun to obtain this said energy they needed a chemical reaction. They used carbon diokside and water to absorb the energy of light and become oxygen and other materials used to grow. Because movement wasn't necessary they became plants. Oh, and the animal thing is that through evolution an animal adapts.
@goffygoober So when a predator was dominating a prey they develop a defense to survive, if it is too effective the predator develops new traits to capture prey. But after so many changes now we are in an evolutionary passive phase when species are able to survive without wiping out others.
This person has a strange idea of evolution. It is like it happened in a few months kind of like his religion claims. He is so deluded by his religion that he can't get to the concept of how much time this takes. He must not believe in antibiotic resistance either.
I love the whole "Atheists just want to sin and not be held accountable". Know why we dont run around raping and killing people? Because we would go to prizon for life! We are held accountable for our actions just as much as religious people are.
actually this is a joke this guy have no idea of what is talking 1: there was no cambrian explosion was more like fsss, 2:you dont understand evolution or chemistry, do you. 3 neither carring capacity you have x pasture and y herbivores when are too many either is no reproduction or starve to death, predator and prey arm race but you don't understand WHY? because you don't or you chose not but the evidence is there open a book the greatest show on earth if you don't accept check the referneces
@Pokarot I find it hard to accept that you would dismiss a video in a mere 13 seconds. This video had many flaws but it really pisses me off when an argument is simply dismissed due to being "embarrassing". I mean, I have been trying to accept Evolution but there are far too many flaws in doing so, incomparable to the amount in this video. This is the part where I say evolution is embarrassing and run off without providing and adequate argument right? Richard Dawkins seems to be doing that now.
@deviIstudios I made it past the "Where did matter and life come from?" (Neither of those have anything to do with evolution) to the point where he thinks that algae was the first life. You give the hypothetical for not providing an adequate argument, but it isn't about arguing at all. To argue with the author of this video would first require educating them, which is the embarrassing part.
@XHavocReaperX stop being ignorant dude. the truth is some atheists dont really give a dam about whether or not god exists, they just wont have it, period. youre like the little kid in elementary that would cover his ears and say "la la la la" really loud when he heard something he didnt want to. grow up plz
Its more often that people who ask such questions do not have the will to educate themselves, than evolutionists not having an answer to questions them as the answers are taught in the high school. Creationists will skip those classes choose to be ignorant, live in denial and expect those who are more knowledgable to debate with them and waste their precious time. thing is its not others responsibility to educate you, specially when you refuse to get educated so adamantly.peace
Not knowing the answer to something does NOT give you the right to choose one of the other infinite possiblities (your god possibly being one) to fill that gap in your knowledge.
This would be obvious to you in ANY other field or situation besides religion. But when it comes to religion and the "big questions", for some reason you make an exception.
It's not our fault that you refuse to look at the answers we provide with an open mind. The fact that no matter how many valid answers you might get, You still will not believe them so what is the point in wasting knowledge on someone who only knows how to ask the questions but not understand the answers due to a closed mind and faith in a book that says the answers are wrong to begin with. I will refuse to believe any of your books have facts unless an prediction is made from one.
Respond to this video... Termite workers and soldiers live in a colony that sacrifices their ability to reproduce so that the queen can. It is specialization of tasks. Further The sacrifice is not great as not reproducing still allows the passing of genes very similar to the non-reproducing workers and soldiers which are shared by the reproducing males and the queen. Further if a colony queen is killed the workers ahve the ability to change into a queen to continue the colony.
Chromosome number does not effect the ability to mate. What matters is that the chromosomes can line up. Humans' extra chromosome can form roughly a chimpanzee's single chromosome by fusing with another. These could line up just fine a majority of the time.
The original life were not autotrophic. They were heterotrophic.
Moreover, ecology is a self-balancing process. As prey population decreases, so does predator population (even with plants and animals), and then prey populations can grow again. Only after enormous change will this system collapse.
You're right: oxygen WOULD fill the atmosphere and start killing life.
This happened, repeatedly, before the ability to tolerate (and later use for energy) oxygen.
Slowly absorbing the oxygen, exposed iron formations (whether above ground or underwater) reduced the oxygen content of the atmosphere. As life died down, more oxygen could be absorbed, so life sprang back again. This causes visible iron banding formations on the sea floor.
I've only watched till the prey and predator part. There will be no such thing as predators being inferior to prey. Creatures are not predetermined prey or predator. It is interdependent. Creatures who are superior are classified as predators, not the other way round. You are committing this logical fallacy because you have already assumed that creatures are created, with no evolutionary background. Your stand has already been influenced by your biased opinion. Furthermore, everyone is accounta
@silentxhero905 He is in Heaven he can't come on Earth without permission. Otherwise he will be going against his rule/law. Why does God let priest molest little boys? Just because he say that he loves God or walks with God doesn't mean he is for god. Not every being has the breath of god, people that molest and claim that they are for God are false prophets. What actual physical evidence do you have that God exists? when you see or witness a demon. Trust me you will then understand.
@silentxhero905 With that being said pick up a bible, not a King James one though that is a horrible one. Read for yourself and prove thy own self approve, so that you will know. Never ask people about the bible without having information already for yourself. Once you read then ask questions. Don't look to commentary or the t.v. for answers because a lot of them are false teachers. Do not tithe look this stuff up in the bible. It tells and rundown everything, read an amplified version.
@silentxhero905 Once again not every human being is God's child. Example: Cain and Abel they was in the same womb at the same time, fighting. Cain was the Devil child and Abel was God's child(THE PROMISED CHILD). It is in Genesis don't listen to hetmanbasza you'll be walking aroung here knowledge-less. Just read it for yourself, if you need help you can e-mail me.
#3 Hierarchy and symbiosis is not that strange. They naturally comes from survival. Plus remember what I said about species evolve as a population? It explains hierarchy in the same species. It is not always working together however, many cases in fact are competition for territory and reproduction rights.
Different species evolve together in symbiosis if their survival benefits each other, thus they tend to evolve together over long periods of time.
#2 You question itself is not science. Evolution and genetics clearly state that sudden change in chromosome number for example will result in extinction of that mutation. The idea is evolution is gradual, and species evolve not as a single generation but through many generations with small changes from one generation to the next.
Also, species evolve as a population and not as single case mutation in one generation.
Your lack of knowledge on the subject made this question pointless.
#1 Such equilibrium is explained in Darwinian natural selection. Equilibrium is reached due to those no longer in equilibrium goes extinct. Close enough but not true equilibrium.
Mistakes in Video: Actually plants do undergo respiration, so truthfully while the atmosphere might be more oxygen rich, the Cambrian Explosion was not really "right on time".
Study a bit more natural selection and evolution please. You time frame is off by millions of years to make that connection for Q1.
I'm a hindu.. I believe in hindu mythology according to which the creator of this whole universe is called brahma who created everything in this universe and universe is billions of years old... there's no such story as of adam and eve..
now by stating that atheists are disillusioned i am assuming that you base that on the fact that they believe earth is billions of years old..
@Undergroundhiphop1 Yep, alot of proven fraud in those books. And the misinformation is still in the books. Do not get me wrong evolution exists to a point, yet the idea that man came from apes; completely absurd. Apes are still apes. And humans are not a common ancestor of an ape. But take heed to whatever you wish. Just remember you will know the answer when you die. Thats my point of view, and its my right, so please don't even bother sending me messages, because its a waste of time.
If you can spot 3 loopholes in the theory of evolution, I'm sure evolutionists will have no problem spotting over 300 loopholes in the theory of creation.
How is it possible that there's an invisible man? How can living things be created? How can he defy the rules of time and space etc etc. The list is never ending.
The theory of evolution is not perfect, but it's the best that we have now with our limited knowledge.
chromosome answer as i'd imagine: the species that gave birth to the first 46-chromosome creature did not necessarily have to have 46 chromosomes itself. their reproductive cells need to carry those genes. reproductive cells reproduce by copying themselves and multiplying. its likely there were many 46 chromosome offspring coming from the same parent.
AndroidCybe 5 days ago
As a primate I am offended that anyone would think that a chimp would evolve into this ignoramus.
notnilccm 1 week ago
Hard to find the concrete questions but here is my answers.
1: Impossible for herbivores to make all primates extinct even without carnivores.
2: I don't know happens if a person with this fusion mates with an without it. Non of your examples discussed this scenario which you draw conclusion on.
3: Through small changes. Some of the scenarios I could quickly think of some possible ways some not. Proving it to be impossible for them to evolve into that state is a lot harder then you think.
Grass89Eater 1 week ago
Birds don't have fur
McCamodrake 1 week ago
Short version of this video: evolution cannot be true because I don't understand it at all.
unforgivn81 1 week ago
After devouring quite a number of birds, one crocodile realised how useful they are to clean their teeth. Other crocodiles saw it and copied the pattern. That is how humans learn face expressions, body language, etc.
Vodkametalhead 2 weeks ago
There is actually no such thing as a perfect balance, you're right about that, that is impossible. But you see, there is a single species that is takng over the planet: the human.
It IS possible for creatures with different cromosomes to procreate under certain circumstances. And if the newborn do not have 64 cromosomes, they have the data in their DNA, which makes it possible for their children to have 64 cromosomes.
Vodkametalhead 2 weeks ago
Go take a bio 101 class at your local comm. college... evoulution can be explained to you there quite well
cardinalkesky 2 weeks ago
you sir, are a moron
pyrea17 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A wise commenter once said: "This video is ignorant even by creationist standards."
I can't agree more!
bitphr3ak 2 weeks ago
infatile?
mymarkis666 2 weeks ago
Stupidity level: Religious
SpidahRidah 2 weeks ago
2) and 3) Nonsense, please make an attempt to learn about speciation and evolution first.
Appealing to ignorance is no challenge to Evolution. It is instead a challenge to you and your capacity to learn and overcome ignorance.
Tenebrous76 3 weeks ago
1) Your question is meandering and poorly thought out and displays a lamentable ignorance of basic biology or even ecology. In ecological systems we see what happens when predators over eat, they starve. This reduces the number of predators and allows the prey to recover. Or it could be disease from over population that thins out the numbers. Equilibrium occurs when balance is achieved though it seems to be a shifting equilibrium as conditions change.
Tenebrous76 3 weeks ago
Go and actually study the topic that youre talking about.
Sweddude 3 weeks ago
I was so surprised when I saw the comments weren't disabled!
rampaginwalrus 4 weeks ago
I respect the fact that you question things. Always trying to see the logic behind it. But still for some extremely odd reason you believe in a god? It seems to me that you were brought up with a religion and that you decided to be one with it even tho it can never work with logic.
vafaneh 1 month ago
Not......sure if trolling......or stupid...
MeBeMat 1 month ago
ANSWERS
1 and 3. Equilibrium occurs because all life adapts to best suit it's environment. Very simple.
2. No 48 creature with 48 chromosomes ever gave birth to one with 46; the 24th pair is in the process of being gradually phased out. In fact, humanity's 2nd chromosome is a fusion of an ancestor's 2nd and 3rd, so homo sapien is what you might call a transitional state.
And the end of the video just made me sad. I seriously pity you, you dumb fuck.
deathtris 1 month ago 3
This video is perfect illustrative material for the staggering stupidity of creationism. Henceforth, I'll use it as a reference.
JaneDoelicious 1 month ago
@IslamoPhilic I have yet to see the video, but inferring from the responses I could say you might have said something like this:
"Something can't come from nothing, so God is the creator of the universe".
There are 2 problems with that:
1- Where did God got the stuff to make the universe, He used his rib, his hand or he simply took some nothing and make it the universe?
2- If he in fact does exists, where is he? and if he is just a conscious aren't we just a fragment of his imagination?
Jarb2104 1 month ago
Wow... this is weapons-grade stupid
Binkophile 1 month ago
we have perfect evidence
epicnathan105 1 month ago
the termites use smells and their antenas to comunicate
epicnathan105 1 month ago
The first animals made the Oxygen and they did die off, dummy.
gregrutz 1 month ago
Uhh wow okay, and Christians believe some random powerful magic dude who no one can even prove exsisted except in this "book" written several years after this person supposedly exsisted. That's more ridiculous than science, if you ask me. Christians are by far the ignorant ones not Atheists.
TayyP22 1 month ago
This video cracks me up. Why do Creationists use Science to explain Religion? LMAO
sentidocomunve 1 month ago
if u say god has created everything then who created god, he can't come from nothing surely, if he was created from nothing then isn't the argument against the big bang and the universe created from nothing then true. something must have come from nothing, oh yeah where does he hang out these days. sure i saw him in the chinese take away getting a number 26 and 43
thehouseinhardwick 1 month ago
Looks like scenario one to me.
Bramak17 1 month ago
The ultimate problem with attempting to answer these questions with actual scientific fact is that there are only two responses to be garnered from the one asking the question- they'll either have no idea what the hell you're talking about, or they'll claim that the submitted evidence is unproven. Either way, no answer is good enough for them.
There's no point in providing answers. We could be educating people who -aren't- hopeless causes.
KajexFiredrake 1 month ago
Easter is cancelled!! They found the body.
Thorpe741 1 month ago
Answer 1. Its called the balance of life and is how ecosystems work. All your postulations are just opinion with no factual backing, just opinion. Evolution is not random this is an ignorant interpretation of the theory. A organism evolves to exploit and fill a niche in nature. Overconsumption would eliminate the organism and niche besides all parties are actively evolving creating balance. Read more than quo-ran and you will be able to understand more.
Bramak17 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People who preach creationism are downright stupid.
SlyDessertFox 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People who preach creationism are downright stupid.
SlyDessertFox 1 month ago
People who preach creationism are downright stupid.
SlyDessertFox 1 month ago
richfucktardmagnet90210 let me spell it out for your stupid ass. Fuck god I have no religion.
Bramak17 1 month ago
Man have you been brainwashed.
leffehoegaarden 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
atheists do not believe God exists, why would they care about being accountable to a non-existant God ? It would be like me worrying about the weed fairy hitting me with a shovel for cutting dandelions when I mow the lawn.
I admit it , my taste in sandwiches has evolved since I was a child. I developed a taste for less sweet and more tangy flavors.
bears haz fur. except Fuzzy Wuzzy. (< see if you get this reference)
SqueakerAlpha 1 month ago
Try the channel cdk007. Answers all the questions.
sbwonderr 1 month ago
I suggest going to the channel cdk007. It'll answer all your questions, even the origin of life from abiogenesis. Evolutionists can find explanations to back their side, and creationists can feel free to fight back!
Not my channel btw. Shameless plug!!
sbwonderr 1 month ago
You ask very interesting questions but got all the answers wrong. You're clearly a very curious young man and this curiosity is needed in the scientific community. Please look into these matters seriously, write an article, and try to get it published in a peer review journal. The nice thing about science is that the person with the best arguments/experiments/demonstrations wins! It's easy to say God is the answer to everything. Too easy.
ruirodtube 2 months ago 2
@ruirodtube No, the guy that made the video is right. You say he's wrong but could never refute any of his points. Look at your post.
richiemagnet90210 1 month ago
@richiemagnet90210 How do you know he is right?
ruirodtube 1 month ago
If you could grasp simple scientific and evolutionary concepts as well as you can grasp your penis (you miss your holy scraps of paper as well) your head might pop out and you could do something useful with your life instead of pig fucking it away like this.
Bramak17 2 months ago
@Bramak17 Oh poor boy, Did somebody say something about your religion that you didn't like. Oh boo hoo.
richiemagnet90210 1 month ago
#1.
Exactly. When all the prey dies in one area sll the predators die leaving only the slow animals in the other areas.
JkebabTNG 2 months ago
religious people have one massive shock coming to them when they die. cus it aint the way they say it is!
saffnpepa 2 months ago
@saffnpepa Because you know????? How???
\
richiemagnet90210 1 month ago
this is what happens when kids are raised being fed bs and being doctrinated to accepting what they are told. most people know how criminal minded psychotic religious people are. claiming how loving and caring they are towards those they torture or cripple with drugs. most scientists are religious and often use concepts or genetics as a shift of blame for the physical or chemical cruelty they commit to people. if not blaming god they say its genetics or the victims manifestd it onto themselves.
saffnpepa 2 months ago
@simkolkay easily the dumbest comment I've read in the last couple of hours
BER2ERKER 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you really are stupid, that's why people call you that... if you haven't figured that out yet... just to let you know. I'm talking, like, extremely stupid haha.
BER2ERKER 2 months ago
But religion is so boooring! How did life start then? Please educate us!
hekama 2 months ago
This video is ignorant even by creationist standards.
KayBeeEee1983 2 months ago 24
This is alot more than 3 questions... cant possibly answer all them in a 500 character limit youtube comment. The internet can answer EVERY question you have brought up. Every single one.
Scientists don't accept new discoveries on a scale this large easily. They have scrutinized and debated evolution ever since Darwin came up with it.
Nothing you ask is a new question, and evolution would not be accepted if the scientists didn't deem counterarguments to these questions valid.
letsgocaps8 2 months ago
WTF is this guy even saying?!??! he says "mother nature" like its some disgusting fat rodent. PEOPLE don't waste ur energy writing paragraphs, cuz i'm sure that no matter what you believe, you don't get anything this guy is saying.
allisonconehead 2 months ago
You fail at being an intelligent human. People like you are the reason the middle east is still a backward shithole, the West, East Asia etc. are in the 21st century. Muslims have contributed nothing positive to the world in the last 500 years. Because you read ONE book from the middle ages and think you know things...
Youmakemefart 2 months ago
idiot
macritchiec 2 months ago
re: #1 The first life was microscopic and it DID produce too much oxygen and result in mass extinction. It was good for organisms which could metabolise oxygen though.
Evolution occurred in "pockets" all over the world. In some places entire species DID die out due to overpredation. In other places they didn't.
But by and large, nature is an arms race. Predators evolve what they need in response to prey capability. They tend not to evolve more capability than needed because: It's not needed.
irrevenant3 2 months ago
Oh for fuck sakes. Evolution is verifiable reality. If I wasn't willing to be accountable for my actions, I'd convince myself an invisible evil makes me do bad things, and an invisible magic scapegoat takes all my punishment.
You know, I'd be a Christian still.
I couldn't watch past 8 seconds.
TheHigherVoltage 2 months ago
Atheism is simply a lack of belief in the notion God exists. Nothing more. You cannot add other meanings to this to make a case....And as you failed 5 seconds into your video, you clearly have no credibility and I won't waste any more time
rogan71 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Conservative Christian Logic:
watch?v=UDBYGXWMAOw
csmcmillion 2 months ago
I Lawl @ trolls <3
xArabianxBeastx 2 months ago
Wow! A logical falacy within ten seconds of the start of the video and I'm done. Congratulations on the shoddy work!
gardener68 2 months ago
surely proof enough that there is no god just by watching this idiotic video, except i had to switch off before the end.
AvoDJ 2 months ago
not worthy of comment. thumbed down
kram83au 2 months ago 13
1. Evolution says that through the process of time, life, of its own accord mutates and adapts to its changing environment. Science says that anything left to itself over a period of time deteriorates. Example: erosion, desertification. Earth once was a tropical paradise.
2. If the earth's orbit was just 100 km's further away from the sun, we would all freeze to death, if it was just 100 km's closer to the sun we wouldn't be able to handle the heat.
simkolkay 2 months ago
@simkolkay
wow...
now that random stuff you’re throwing around proves … well … what actually?
1 you’ve just proven how little you know about the subject: you take a biological statement, compare it to a physical (and quite specific) one, give a geological example for it and draw a biblical conclusion… that’s multi-level-bullshit.
2 and now you add cosmology and throw in Numbers, which are disproven by the mere existence of certain planets whitin our system.
AxEnTiger 2 months ago
@AxEnTiger No crap here but your ineffective attempt to disprove something by simply showing contempt. Your debating is quite poor. You can't deny it so you rubbish it. The B.S is coming from you.
simkolkay 2 months ago
@simkolkay
Well first of all the debating is going to start, when you finally present your case or at least make a subject-connected statement.
I have not tried to disprove anything, since there was nothing to disprove (or deny/ rubbish).
I’ve merely shown that the statements you put together are not even related (which needs to be the case, if you want too make an argument)
In case u don’t know: Biology-> Life-related : Physics,geology,cosmology-> not Live-related
no statement - no debate
AxEnTiger 2 months ago
@AxEnTiger I'm not going to take this any further with you because you are only interested in isolating things that are intrinsically interconnected. The geology of the earth is the infrastructure and environment for biology to be sustainable, the cosmology of our system is what keeps the geology of our planet in tact. Without our biology, the planet still exists, just look at the other planets around us. Without geology, our earth is nothing more than gas. Evolution is a lie.
simkolkay 2 months ago
@simkolkay Creation = the universe was created step by step into an intricately woven system of Galaxies and star systems, which house our solar system, which houses our Earth, which houses life on a terrestrial level.
Evolution = the universe suddenly came into being of its own accord and over billions of years somehow set it self up so that all the galaxies are fully functional and our own solar system works with clockwork precision randomly.. Ahh, No.
simkolkay 2 months ago
@simkolkay
1. so … what conclusion or predictions do we draw from this?
How does this explain the shape and movement of celestial objects and of course the change of living beings over generations?
2. That’s my point… you don’t even know the basics…
Evolution is NOT ABOUT THE UNIVERSE. It’s about live. No live – no evolution.
And (that’s irrelevant anyway, but) where exactly in the universe have you seen “clockwork precision“?
AxEnTiger 2 months ago
@simkolkay
Please learn some quantum mechanics before you pretend that you know something about the origin of the universe.
Also, you clearly have not studied evolution since you think it has something to do with the origin of the universe. This means you are either extremely old, or just another god damn 13 year old kid. Come back when you finish high school.
Thanks for the laugh though.
Madpolis7 2 months ago
@Madpolis7 Great work. Mock other people's comments without actually saying anything yourself. A typical evolutionist's response. I won't argue with you, there's no point in contending with willingly ignorant fools.
simkolkay 2 months ago
@simkolkay
Willingly ignorant? Being willingly ignorant IS THE DEFINITION of creationism.
youtube.com/watch?v=FoZW7-3YSns
You are correct in saying there is no point in arguing with willingly ignorant fools, which is exactly why I didn't say anything. You clearly haven't studied evolution, so that means that you are young and haven't taken high school level biology yet, extremely old when they didn't teach evolution in schools, or you willingly failed that class in the name of your religion.
Madpolis7 2 months ago
@Madpolis7 No, you just don't have anything to say, stop wasting my time.
simkolkay 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@simkolkay
Stop spreading lies on internet, think of the children.
Madpolis7 2 months ago
@simkolkay
dude…
have not laugh that much for a while now XD…
Seriously man, get an education.
This stuff isn’t exclusive and earth bound…
It’s UNIVERSAL: where is life, there is biology, where is a rock, there is geology, where is space, there is cosmology and physics.
The reason they have different names is, they describe different things.
And of course there are partially connected, but the examples you picked up happened to be exclusives of those subjects and irrelevant to evolution.
AxEnTiger 2 months ago
Ignore the statement about the hawks with poor eyesight dying, that was meant to be deleted. The hawks would die by eating the mice to the point where there were so few left that it couldn't sustain the hawks until they reproduced to a level to support their population again. The hawks who were more adapted to eat different foods would survive until they could hunt their pray of choice again.
strkszone 2 months ago
Also the reason y herbivores/carnivores cant overtake each other is they evolved so they couldnt be taken over. Say there were hawks that fed off field mice. Their were 2 kinds of field mice, brown and white. In the summer the brown would survive from camouflage. The hawks with poor eyesight would die off as they can't find food, and the brown mice would live as the white mice were eaten. Opposite in the snow but then it didnt snow for a very long time in winter, the hawks eat all mice, and die.
strkszone 2 months ago
To address the 3rd argument of (2nd in the video sorry, I mixed them up) of symbiosis is a faulty representation. They developed this relationship over time. I'm sure when crocodiles first go birds picking food out of their teeth they would snap their jaws shut, but over time they learned that they benefited off of this relationship. Relationships aren't pre-existing they are learned from relying on the other.
strkszone 2 months ago
1. Oxygen being present in a compound wouldn't have destroyed the organisms as discussed. Because they're bonded with other atoms. It isn't pure oxygen anymore, it is a new molecule with oxygen in it. This is like asking, "If we breathe in oxygen, then why can't we breathe in water???" 2. The offspring would still be able to pro-create with its closest relatives but this would cause an even greater change to its off spring. How would you explain human engineered evolution..? Coincidence? lol
strkszone 2 months ago
The problem with his claims are most of these things have in fact been answered and it is because of experiments and evidence that leads us to assume it. If evidence of the contrary arises then it is revised. If there is a lack of evidence it states it is not yet known. If one tries to explain it, it is a hypothesis which is then tested to verify, if the hypothesis is valid or not. Evolution has a lot more proof than Religion, as it can be repeated and observed. Religion can't be, sorry.
strkszone 2 months ago
I thought this was quite funny. I thought the mindless evolutionary responses were even funnier. They all claimed that these things were easily explained but refused to offer an explanation - Just like the theory of evolution. It makes many claims but its explanations are woefull. When the greatest scientific mind of the modern era - Isaac Newton laughed at the plausibilty of evolution, Charles Darwin thought it was okay... and people believed him...
simkolkay 2 months ago
@simkolkay
1: you realize that Newton died almost 100 years before Darwin was even born?
2: name one “easily explained” thing, which wasn’t explained.
3: as for the vid, I’ve answered those questions a while ago and even asked some myself, but the author never bothered to actually defend his position (which would be some what of a surprise).
AxEnTiger 2 months ago
@AxEnTiger I never implied that Darwin and Newton were of the same era, just that Newton's observations were scientific and form the basis of modern science. Darwin on the other hand made connections to things that he didn't really understand and his experiments with developing a higher order hum via inbreeding failed dismally. I used to be an evolutionist but the flaws and contradictory evidence made me look to creation because evolution is an impossibility - chaos produces more chaos.
simkolkay 2 months ago
@simkolkay
You claim “Newton laughed at the plausibilty of evolution” without implying Newton ever heard of evolution?
You realize physics and biology are entirely different fields?
More over, do you realize that Newtons theory of gravitation (yes, it's allso “just a theory”) is proven wrong for quite some time now, while the theory of evolution remains the most supported one?
btw. how come you couldn't name ONE thing that'd be a problem for evolution?
AxEnTiger 2 months ago
Wait, if there was a CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION...WOULDNT EVERYTHING BE DEAD? I heard it was pretty big.
grendelee 2 months ago
Was that a picture of a creature mutating randomly? HAHa everything is so hilarious 4 in the morning....
grendelee 2 months ago
HEY FUCKTARD! We're tired of getting asked the same questions over and over! All of your questions are easily answered, you dip-shit!
SonicTheEggNog 2 months ago
I'm so glad we don't have "evolutionists" here in Europe.
We do have normal people, en a few creationists that normal people can laught at...
drijfkip1 2 months ago 2
@drijfkip1 Dude, unless you live here, you have no Idea how ass-backwards most of us Americans really are. It's sooooooooo embarrassing... Thank god for educated Europe!
SonicTheEggNog 2 months ago
Question 3: that's not even one single question. It's a lot of questions that are easily answered, but not like this. Get yourself some decent school books about evolutionary biology and such things are explained for even the numbest minds to understand.
kenninast 2 months ago
Question 2: It's not like that... at ALL. Again it's trial and error. Several organisms have offspring with similar and compatible features, capabilities, physical specifications. Those that are favourable ensure reproduction with these very points. If they aren't favourable, they will cease to exist and to evolve.
kenninast 2 months ago
Question 1: yes. But "random" and "accident" are very different things. It's like: you try to create a new food recipe. You start testing with several ingredients. First doesn't work... second neither... but then at some point, it's great, That's trial and error... that's random. But it's not an "accident". Same goes with evolution. Random? Yes. Accident? Not by far.
kenninast 2 months ago
Your "hard questions" don't even have anything to do with the Theory of Evolution.
yillow1 2 months ago
wow.... and the earth is only 2000 years old.
GoGadgetHookerClean 2 months ago
Willingly ignorant! ANYONE who read a book on evolution would understand how stupid these questions are. Go ask a biologist...! Or are you too scared you'll actually get the answers?
kusalaviro 2 months ago
You know that this 'nearly impossible coincidence' of a creature with a different number of chromosomes happens regularly in humans? It's called Down's Syndrome. Do some research.
Leopleuredon 2 months ago
So did god miraculously make the koran? after he made the Bible? after he made the books of Zoroaster? after he made the Torah? or did a bunch of desert nobodies adapt previous works to fit into their modern eras? It is totally impossible for languages to change because we still use older version and anyone with common sense wouldn't believe that poppycock!
morakdais 2 months ago
Question 1: Your assumption is wrong. The cambrian explosion was preceded by a mass extinction event. So NO not ballanced. AND plant eating organisms existed during the Edicaran period SO wrong again.
Question 2: Sometimes homozygotes produces hetrozygotes i.e. the offspring has one more chromosome. If two hetrozygotes reproduce, their offspring can become homozygotes but with one more chromosome than their parents.
Question 3: Yes? Coevolution exists... deal with it...
aakesson1 3 months ago
I stopped listening at 1min. I can't understand a word this guy is saying.
Kaaz420 3 months ago
XD Im sorry but this guys stupidity is just too funny.....GO LEARN SOME SCIENCE INSTEAD OF FEARING IT!.......WHAT A GOON!
Metalmoose47 3 months ago
Vote for Pedro!
stephenzevon 3 months ago
You should really learn your opponents positions before you try to debate.
OK you did a really good job in proving evolution is untrue. I believe it is untrue.
Now prove creationism is true. Can you do it without attacking evolution?
pchtermino1 3 months ago
@pchtermino1 I agree, Creationism has it's pros and cons in the matter at hand, which is something that frustrates the intellectually curious over a number of hundreds of things. We're all aware of the 6 day creation story ( Jews/Christians/Muslims Yahweh/God/Allah rested at the 7th), but the curious scientific minds of today's society demands for details on the said event. Because of the lack of intellectual basis on the matters (which they dubbed it so for some reason) they went to evolution.
bigjoe777 3 months ago
the basic idea of this is "if you dont understand something god did it," just because there may be some things which we do not yet (yet being the operative word, remember we used to think the world was flat until we discovered evidence to the contrary) understand doesnt mean we wont ever understand or work out why it happened, if everyone just accepted the idea that god made everything we would never learn anything.
danrad132 3 months ago
herpa derpa
OrNyLexx 3 months ago
I know that this guy can't walk. In order for him to walk he would have to take
a series of steps which according to him are impossible because he got to where
he is by god placing him where he is.
mentalphysicalism 3 months ago
BOOYAH!!! What do you say to that creationists? P.S. There is a lot people don't know that science is trying to find out. Because we find new things we learn from them. Open your eyes and move forward than follow rules set 2000 years ago.
goffygoober 3 months ago
#3 Ants probably started with the queen which bred workers. Now a brain may or may not have the ability to think. If it has then it needs to sleep or die of overusing. But worker ants don't sleep they just obey and protect their mother and brothers by building home. While for aligators it is known that because the aligators don't see what's in front of them, while lying like a log for a small critter, they bite only when they feel something touch their tongue(unless hunting) if we assume...
goffygoober 3 months ago
@goffygoober that the bird didn't touch the tongue and ate the leftovers on his teeth, that would explain the current "doctor birds". Now even when seeing them aligators don't mind them, because they are good for their teeth.
goffygoober 3 months ago
@goffygoober Oh and the fish thing is easy. Because other fish wanted to eat glassfish so the redmouthes protected their food source. Like humans used to offer some of them for protection by the "gods" so do the glassfish offer few of theirs for redmouth protection from other predators.
goffygoober 3 months ago
#2 When evolving we do not lose the traits we had from previous species. A human still has genetic potential to have a tail and chickens have genetic potential to have teeth. Through this we can assume that to survive the first creatures could have used their genetic potential to replcicate themselves, thus creating a second of that breed. Now this ability is dormant because it requires a lot of energy and has less genetic space to advance.
goffygoober 3 months ago
#1 Because there a lot of oxygen back then the first living organisms used it as fuel similar to us making fire. Later on when oxygen was depleting other organisms started taking energy from the sun to obtain this said energy they needed a chemical reaction. They used carbon diokside and water to absorb the energy of light and become oxygen and other materials used to grow. Because movement wasn't necessary they became plants. Oh, and the animal thing is that through evolution an animal adapts.
goffygoober 3 months ago
@goffygoober So when a predator was dominating a prey they develop a defense to survive, if it is too effective the predator develops new traits to capture prey. But after so many changes now we are in an evolutionary passive phase when species are able to survive without wiping out others.
goffygoober 3 months ago
Science: "I don't know the answer, we should use logic, reason and investigation to find the answer!"
Religion: "GOD DID IT!"
TheDolefish 3 months ago
For Q2, a number of 46 chromy creatures evolved at the same time. They were a tribe or a horde, call it what you will.
As for the rest, read a science textbook.
zsupersaiyan 3 months ago
uhmm we have created living cells from non living molecules, look it up.
ok so 1) your logic is flawed science has thoroughly explained everything in this point so i wont even bother trying to explain it to you
2) evolution is through gradual changes so the first "man" to evolved would be identical to his species save one or two mutations
3) you seem to lack the understanding that evolution occurs over 10000000000s of years
ok to sum up, you would get laughed out of bio 101 go fuck your self
comradebashu 3 months ago
This person has a strange idea of evolution. It is like it happened in a few months kind of like his religion claims. He is so deluded by his religion that he can't get to the concept of how much time this takes. He must not believe in antibiotic resistance either.
jollyandwaylo 3 months ago
I love the whole "Atheists just want to sin and not be held accountable". Know why we dont run around raping and killing people? Because we would go to prizon for life! We are held accountable for our actions just as much as religious people are.
kilroy055 3 months ago
actually this is a joke this guy have no idea of what is talking 1: there was no cambrian explosion was more like fsss, 2:you dont understand evolution or chemistry, do you. 3 neither carring capacity you have x pasture and y herbivores when are too many either is no reproduction or starve to death, predator and prey arm race but you don't understand WHY? because you don't or you chose not but the evidence is there open a book the greatest show on earth if you don't accept check the referneces
legolasgreenleaff 3 months ago
you, my friend, are so fucking stupid, and not because you have questions but because you didn't bother to look for an answer first.
there are answers, for example look on youtube for potholer54 and watch his videos.
patrioticcow 3 months ago
Slowly... Losing.. IQ...
Thnkz2 3 months ago
nice questions lol evolution is so stupid.
Str8talk50 3 months ago
there is only one answer i can give to your 3 questions......
Hahahahahahahahahaha you moron
tonybuk70 3 months ago
I had to stop watching, the author of the video needs to at least TRY and educate themselves in what they are talking about. This was embarrassing.
Pokarot 3 months ago 31
@Pokarot Can you elaborate?
deviIstudios 3 months ago
@deviIstudios In the first 13 seconds he's already lied and proven how little he knows about evolution.
Pokarot 3 months ago
@Pokarot I find it hard to accept that you would dismiss a video in a mere 13 seconds. This video had many flaws but it really pisses me off when an argument is simply dismissed due to being "embarrassing". I mean, I have been trying to accept Evolution but there are far too many flaws in doing so, incomparable to the amount in this video. This is the part where I say evolution is embarrassing and run off without providing and adequate argument right? Richard Dawkins seems to be doing that now.
deviIstudios 3 months ago
@deviIstudios I made it past the "Where did matter and life come from?" (Neither of those have anything to do with evolution) to the point where he thinks that algae was the first life. You give the hypothetical for not providing an adequate argument, but it isn't about arguing at all. To argue with the author of this video would first require educating them, which is the embarrassing part.
Pokarot 3 months ago
Herp. Derp. Fucking Moron.
XHavocReaperX 3 months ago 18
@XHavocReaperX stop being ignorant dude. the truth is some atheists dont really give a dam about whether or not god exists, they just wont have it, period. youre like the little kid in elementary that would cover his ears and say "la la la la" really loud when he heard something he didnt want to. grow up plz
JDaveD 2 months ago
May I note, none of the "hard questions" he refrained from asking are relevant to evolution
ShouldersofGiants100 3 months ago
Its more often that people who ask such questions do not have the will to educate themselves, than evolutionists not having an answer to questions them as the answers are taught in the high school. Creationists will skip those classes choose to be ignorant, live in denial and expect those who are more knowledgable to debate with them and waste their precious time. thing is its not others responsibility to educate you, specially when you refuse to get educated so adamantly.peace
sushanalone 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Not knowing the answer to something does NOT give you the right to choose one of the other infinite possiblities (your god possibly being one) to fill that gap in your knowledge.
This would be obvious to you in ANY other field or situation besides religion. But when it comes to religion and the "big questions", for some reason you make an exception.
extropian314 3 months ago
Comment removed
extropian314 3 months ago
Comment removed
extropian314 3 months ago
It's not our fault that you refuse to look at the answers we provide with an open mind. The fact that no matter how many valid answers you might get, You still will not believe them so what is the point in wasting knowledge on someone who only knows how to ask the questions but not understand the answers due to a closed mind and faith in a book that says the answers are wrong to begin with. I will refuse to believe any of your books have facts unless an prediction is made from one.
BelialAndar 3 months ago
@BelialAndar i posted my comment and i see you expressing the same thing, perhaps i should have read yours before posting.
sushanalone 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sushanalone It's the truth, so it deserves to be posted more than once.
BelialAndar 3 months ago
Respond to this video... Termite workers and soldiers live in a colony that sacrifices their ability to reproduce so that the queen can. It is specialization of tasks. Further The sacrifice is not great as not reproducing still allows the passing of genes very similar to the non-reproducing workers and soldiers which are shared by the reproducing males and the queen. Further if a colony queen is killed the workers ahve the ability to change into a queen to continue the colony.
sushanalone 3 months ago
Chromosome number does not effect the ability to mate. What matters is that the chromosomes can line up. Humans' extra chromosome can form roughly a chimpanzee's single chromosome by fusing with another. These could line up just fine a majority of the time.
TaslemGuy 3 months ago
The original life were not autotrophic. They were heterotrophic.
Moreover, ecology is a self-balancing process. As prey population decreases, so does predator population (even with plants and animals), and then prey populations can grow again. Only after enormous change will this system collapse.
TaslemGuy 3 months ago
You're right: oxygen WOULD fill the atmosphere and start killing life.
This happened, repeatedly, before the ability to tolerate (and later use for energy) oxygen.
Slowly absorbing the oxygen, exposed iron formations (whether above ground or underwater) reduced the oxygen content of the atmosphere. As life died down, more oxygen could be absorbed, so life sprang back again. This causes visible iron banding formations on the sea floor.
TaslemGuy 3 months ago
I'll be answering these questions in the following comments.
TaslemGuy 3 months ago
@IslamoPhilic
my debunk before watching the video:
1)evolution is a fact...it is endorsed by churches, schools and scientists.
2) creationism is a lie
My debunk after watching 30 seconds of the video video:
1)atheism is not about not liking to be held accountable by god, it is about not believing things that do not provide evidence
2)creatures do not mutate "randomly", mutations that favor survival are passed on, traits that do not are not.
you sir are a retard. do some research. thank you.
MoralRapist 3 months ago
lol?
Beefcakes155 3 months ago
I've only watched till the prey and predator part. There will be no such thing as predators being inferior to prey. Creatures are not predetermined prey or predator. It is interdependent. Creatures who are superior are classified as predators, not the other way round. You are committing this logical fallacy because you have already assumed that creatures are created, with no evolutionary background. Your stand has already been influenced by your biased opinion. Furthermore, everyone is accounta
fusionfusion 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Your ignorance blinds you. Do yourself a favor and watch this.
Top Ten Creationist Arguments
watch?v=SSxgnu3Hww8&feature=relmfu
silentxhero905 3 months ago
Comment removed
silentxhero905 3 months ago
A lot of the assumptions made in this video about evolutionists are false. That being said, I have 3 questions for creationists.
Why can't you see God?
What actual physical evidence do you have that God exists?
Why does God let priests molest little boys?
silentxhero905 3 months ago
@silentxhero905
Because if he was seen it would be less interesting.
Stand in front of a mirror. What you see in there is the miracle of God's cration and even you, yes you, have a direct link to him through your mind.
Because priests found boys more challenging (or whatever you want to fill in this stupid question).
hetmanbasza 3 months ago
@silentxhero905 no one knows.. no one knows.. and the same reason anyone can do anything evil
indefinable88 3 months ago
@silentxhero905 He is in Heaven he can't come on Earth without permission. Otherwise he will be going against his rule/law. Why does God let priest molest little boys? Just because he say that he loves God or walks with God doesn't mean he is for god. Not every being has the breath of god, people that molest and claim that they are for God are false prophets. What actual physical evidence do you have that God exists? when you see or witness a demon. Trust me you will then understand.
kalaworld 3 months ago
@silentxhero905 With that being said pick up a bible, not a King James one though that is a horrible one. Read for yourself and prove thy own self approve, so that you will know. Never ask people about the bible without having information already for yourself. Once you read then ask questions. Don't look to commentary or the t.v. for answers because a lot of them are false teachers. Do not tithe look this stuff up in the bible. It tells and rundown everything, read an amplified version.
kalaworld 3 months ago
@silentxhero905 Once again not every human being is God's child. Example: Cain and Abel they was in the same womb at the same time, fighting. Cain was the Devil child and Abel was God's child(THE PROMISED CHILD). It is in Genesis don't listen to hetmanbasza you'll be walking aroung here knowledge-less. Just read it for yourself, if you need help you can e-mail me.
kalaworld 3 months ago
I answered all 3 question, if you like to know more in detail I suggest study some science on your own.
I thought 3 questions would be more interesting or difficult since it is shorter but it turns out to be freshmen level high school biology...
For your own benefit, study... Regardless of your faith, you should gather more knowledge.
Neosaigo 3 months ago
#3 Hierarchy and symbiosis is not that strange. They naturally comes from survival. Plus remember what I said about species evolve as a population? It explains hierarchy in the same species. It is not always working together however, many cases in fact are competition for territory and reproduction rights.
Different species evolve together in symbiosis if their survival benefits each other, thus they tend to evolve together over long periods of time.
Basic biology.
Neosaigo 3 months ago
#2 You question itself is not science. Evolution and genetics clearly state that sudden change in chromosome number for example will result in extinction of that mutation. The idea is evolution is gradual, and species evolve not as a single generation but through many generations with small changes from one generation to the next.
Also, species evolve as a population and not as single case mutation in one generation.
Your lack of knowledge on the subject made this question pointless.
Neosaigo 3 months ago
#1 Such equilibrium is explained in Darwinian natural selection. Equilibrium is reached due to those no longer in equilibrium goes extinct. Close enough but not true equilibrium.
Mistakes in Video: Actually plants do undergo respiration, so truthfully while the atmosphere might be more oxygen rich, the Cambrian Explosion was not really "right on time".
Study a bit more natural selection and evolution please. You time frame is off by millions of years to make that connection for Q1.
Neosaigo 3 months ago
Comment removed
Neosaigo 3 months ago
@Undergroundhiphop1 U know i did and it said the human organizm has GILL SLITS!!! Wow really? or maybe it was a typo...
JustPlainBored00 3 months ago
HAHAAAHHAAA All the evolutionists are like 5 year olds saying "read a biology book" They have not given one godd answer ROTFLMYGDAO
MrThepwnstar 3 months ago
i agree on all your points, the atheists are disillusioned, only God could have done all this
StrelokNikitin 3 months ago
@StrelokNikitin
i'm not an atheist.
I'm a hindu.. I believe in hindu mythology according to which the creator of this whole universe is called brahma who created everything in this universe and universe is billions of years old... there's no such story as of adam and eve..
now by stating that atheists are disillusioned i am assuming that you base that on the fact that they believe earth is billions of years old..
are you also saying hindus are disilluioned too..
MrRorschachable 3 months ago
@MrRorschachable i was being sarcastic
StrelokNikitin 3 months ago
@StrelokNikitin =D
MrRorschachable 3 months ago
@Undergroundhiphop1 Yep, alot of proven fraud in those books. And the misinformation is still in the books. Do not get me wrong evolution exists to a point, yet the idea that man came from apes; completely absurd. Apes are still apes. And humans are not a common ancestor of an ape. But take heed to whatever you wish. Just remember you will know the answer when you die. Thats my point of view, and its my right, so please don't even bother sending me messages, because its a waste of time.
WDTripps 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WDTripps what your point
StrelokNikitin 3 months ago
you should read the biology books, before you make this vido.
cateattingmonster0 3 months ago
If you can spot 3 loopholes in the theory of evolution, I'm sure evolutionists will have no problem spotting over 300 loopholes in the theory of creation.
How is it possible that there's an invisible man? How can living things be created? How can he defy the rules of time and space etc etc. The list is never ending.
The theory of evolution is not perfect, but it's the best that we have now with our limited knowledge.
renjie1989 3 months ago