Added: 4 years ago
From: sixthheretic
Views: 8,298
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (796)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hello brother! Have you been to the Christogenea website?

  • Thank you for speaking the truth! Heil Yahshua!

  • @sixthheretic Am I off on this?

  • @Tertioptus your reply to georgephyl sounds accurate

  • Comment removed

  • God tells the wife to submitt but also tells everyone to submitt to one another! YOUR JOB IS TO LOVE YOUR WIFE AS CHRIST LOVED THE CHURCH! I think the wife should do her part and the husband should do his!

    God gave Eve to adam to help him have dominion!

    WOMEN HEAR FROM GOD FIRST! submit to husband second!

    This brother and all men need to die likee Christ did! In other words die to your will for the sake of your wife!

    God made man and woman to be ONE!

  • @Georgephyl The wifes job is to submit to here husband in all things then the husband is to love his wife as christ loved the church. Yes eve is the helper of adam but god told eve that her desire shall be to her husband and he shall rule over her. Women are supposed to submit to hvhY will first but hvhY will is for the wife to submit to their husbands in all things. A woman is one flesh like the man is one spirit with jesus yet jesus is clearly the one in charge So to is the man over the woman.

  • @sixthheretic After the fall God told Eve that her desire would be to her husband and that he would rule over her! The lack of harmony between husband and wife is a direct result of sin entering the world!

  • @Georgephyl I dont disagree with that statement

  • Comment removed

  • @Tertioptus Neither husband or wife should attend to whims of anyone! All believers are to walk in the Spirit so they will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh!

    I guess you are one with your car! I will pray for you!

  • Comment removed

  • @Georgephyl What are you talking about? Do you like sounding smug like that, "I will pray for you!". Look man it's you who doesn't like the God of the Bible. You like the God of Olsteen, the Government, of pop culture. Like it or not, wives are the property of their husbands, just as Christians were bought at a price by Christ. Aren't your children your property. Don't you love what you own, and cherish it. This is God's Word man, we're not trying seek nirvana here. There is no truth greater.

  • @Tertioptus I'd rather pray than argue scripture. I know that you believe your understanding and likewise I believe mine!

    According to Word I believe male doninance was due to the fall. Before that God had given Eve to Adam to help him have dominion!Together they were to rule the garden! Husband and wife are to be one! Very clear in pastoral letters leaders are to be the Husband of one wife! I am sure you have some response I will not agree with! Instead I will pray!

  • @Georgephyl 1cor14[37] If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.

    [38] But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

    1cor11[3] But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

  • @Georgephyl Dude, you started it. You can't post aa argument and not expect a rebuttal. Then, try to sound like Ghandi, and peace your way out. Sometimes there is absolute truth, and if you really don't want to hear a conflicting point of view, then keep your's to yourself.

  • I was searching for a video about why women never seem to like taking a sexually dominant role in relationships... This video made me feel like a freak of nature for being attracted to that.

    Sexually submissive men lose. Both in relationships and religion.

  • @Xilosphere Sorry about that but I dont catter to what people want to hear I just repeat what the bible says. 

  • Other than the glasses this guy LOOKS like Jesus, I might follow him!

  • @danning1 good to know

  • Another thing to note is the messiah is the head of man, Man is the head of woman, some men try to pull the whole "well you submit first, THEN I will love you" bit..... I think we need to keep our eyes on the Messiah for this one, He did the will of the father FIRST then man was able to submit to him. If a man is not walking in the will of the father...you can bet a Godly woman WILL NOT SUBMITT lol fellas take point :) your wives will follow :) shalom

  • @gingersuger1 All of man kind must first submit to hvhY before hvhY offers us salvation. Those of lesser authority must submit first then those of higher authority must love those of lesser authority. once we take a step towards hvhY then hvhY takes a hundred step toward us.

  • I know this whole vid is about how women are not suposed to teach men lol but I have a correction to point out, in Eph 5:22 It tells men to love their wives AS MESSIAH LOVED THE CHURCH and gave him self for her. <3 you said Husbands love your wives as you love your self lol im sure you made this mistake honestly :) just a friendly pointer. I enjoyed this video.

  • @gingersuger1 Though my statement is not false it is misquoted. I merged two scripture by accident. one where all christians are to love their neighbor as they love themselves and of course the verse you just mentioned. Good catch. For future refrence The way you should have shared that with me is privately and asking the question "where is that verse in the bible" After looking for it futily I would have had to admit that I misquoted and would have to add a disclaimer.

  • Do you think a woman can "teach" a man in a non-authoritative manner e.g. a husband & wife come together to pray & study the Word & the wife shares her thoughts/insights with the husband which edifies him? Similarly then, could a woman have a public ministry that is not authoritative but edificational? There are places in the Bible where context affects interpretation—perhaps how we interpret "teaching" in these contexts should take into account whether it is binding or non-binding? Thanks.

  • I anticipate the "being silent in churches" response, although many still think it applies only to authoritative teaching, so I will also ask how you think the restriction on women teaching (non-authoritatively) applies outside of official church meetings.

  • @looseSpark

    Actually the best way for a woman to speak non authoratatively is to ask questions as you have done with me. Asking leading question is a great way for women to witness with out challenging a man authority. Though asking questions in the church is forbidden in the bible for women.Women are alowed to ask questions of any man privately as long as they are humble and submissive when they ask the question. When jesus was young did not teach the rabbis he asked questions and amazed them

  • @sixthheretic

    Have you received the PM I sent you on january 26th ? I ask this because it doesn't appear in the "messages sent" column in my box.

  • @framboise595 no I did not recieve it.

  • @sixthheretic

    Ok so I will try to send another one soon.

  • Comment removed

  • (...) 1 Peter 3 commands wives to submit to their husbands even if they don't follow God's Word.

    The Bible clearly says that female submission can gently lead a man to salvation.

    Do women really think of HIS future salvation or only about themselves who are already saved ?

  • @framboise595 Great point. Really awesome insight

  • Sorry I go by the King James book..IT does not say women are equal!! what does a woman need education for,not like she is going to use it for anything,Women's job is to stay at home,cooking,cleaning and having men's offspring..Don't need an education for that.In the King James Titus 2:5 [To be] discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.

  • @billthemisogynist The bible does say women are equal to men in one area.

    Gal.3[28] There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither MALE nor FEMALE: for YE ARE ALL ONE in Christ Jesus.

    We are all equal to jesus in righteousness.

    By the way what does a man need an education for if a woman doesnt need one?

  • @sixthheretic No way!! What I say goes!! She has no say in anything.

    I'm not spending my hard earn money on expensive things for her!! she gets what I give her and like it or else.

    My money is mine,not her's.

    PM from billthemisoynist

  • sixthheretic reply- What about being a cheerful giver? What about he that is the greatest leader among you must be a servant. What about the husband must love the wife as much as he loves himself for they are one flesh. The love of money it the root of most evils. You sound like a greedy spoiled child. "You cant touch my ball it mine." Grow up and start loving your wife as jesus loved the church. If jesus can sacrifice his life for you maybe you could let you wife spend a little of your money?

  • Could use a hair cut I think.....

  • @prairiemark wow! does anyone read previous comments before posting comments?

    Do a search for my video "Long Hair, Beard and Head Covering" to answer your question.

  • @sixthheretic I didn't post a question, but a statement of fact.

  • Why does your God see there being such a rigid power structure between men and women? Why does he care? Why should an innocent woman tolerate abuse if he is a bad man?

  • @Davetacular45 Because Man was created before women. Without Man, there would not be woman. For the rest watch this video and read THE Bible

  • @djinnwalker You know if you want men to treat you as an equal you might want to treat others the way you want to be treated. I have had to remove six of your posts because they were offensive and degrading. The exact thing you say you are fighting against. So why dont you stop being a hypocrite grow up and actually have an adult conversation that doesnt involve name calling.

  • @djinnwalker

    Gal #:28 is in refrence to hvhY loving all of us equally. But 1cor11 3 shows that hvhY sees the differences in authority.

    Pheobe is no a teacher but a "succourer of many" women were charged to care for the believers not teach.

    Priscilla is not mentioned with out her husband Aquilla whom did the teaching

    Euodia and Syntyche labored they took care of paul and helped him. Teaching is no mentioned

    As for junia you forgot to mention her husband Andronicus who is mentioned first.

  • @djinnwalker You know I find it amusing that you claim that men are disrespectfull and abusive to women yet you have been disrespectful and abusive to men and women alike on here. If you want to continue to post here I suggest that you treat everyone as equals just like you preach.

  • @djinnwalker True but women have to submit to hvhY and a man of hvhY unlike a man who must only submit to hvhY alone.

  • @djinnwalker Where does hvhY command that I have short hair? In fact the bible commands that men do the exact opposite.

    Lev.19[27] Ye shall not round the corners of your heads, neither shalt thou mar the corners of thy beard.

  • @djinn

    women can prophesy and pray but that is all.1Cor.14[34] Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.[35] And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.[37] If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord.

  • @djinnwalker Not true. women were there with adam (whom being male was created first) and at the end with jesus was a woman but it was the man that was chosen to fullfill the prophetic scriptures no a woman. And even in the time of adam hvhY said to the woman

    Gen.3

    [16] (b) ...and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

    Female submission is not just a new testament thing it is also a old testament thing.

  • @djinnwalker, I'm sure that one last comment was right out of scripture, but I don't understand exactly what you want to say, it's the rules about women being submissive to men I was talking about. our job is to be a supporting role and no amount of anger will change the order of things, there is the creator, then the son, then men then women, no more no less and you can be angry all you want I can go back to the hole I came from and still this fact will not change.

  • Some call me a Feminist because I say women should be anything if they want to, but I got some bad things to say about women, women fight with each other more than men do, women in my experience made bad doctors ordering me around like I am a little kid more than a male doctor does, women mooch of men and other women more than men do, yes my username is LadyAvarice but I don't mooch I just don't share I have a good job and I want to keep it to myself.

  • @djinnwalker see them as equal is not the problem, is not that we are inferior, but we do have a different role, when he talked to a woman at the well he said go get your husband, did he not? do you have any scripture citing an ideological discussion with the Messiah changing the role (the rules or law) between man and women please share.

  • @djinnwalker No, your a feminism/feminist and you will be destroyed..Other women have already see the light about Feminism/feminist/ Feminazis and they want it destroyed. So guess what "You loose!!"

  • @djinnwalker Women are not equal to men!!!! They'll never be equal to men!!! Feminism/feminist is bad and is ruining society!! They taught women how to take a man's job and his money away!!! I've done my research ! Read Titus chapter 2 verse 5 (this is a woman's role in life) To be discreet, chaste, KEEPERS AT HOME, good, OBEDIENT TO THEIR OWN HUSBANDS, that the word of God bee not blasphemed. Don't see where it says that women are equal,do you?

  • If women were so equal,then why did God make man first?? Men was first,then women,then children..

  • @billthemisogynist

    Women are equal to men as humans because they both belong to the same race (as opposed to animals). But as sexual beings ,they are totally different.

    The Bible teaches us that men are God's glory and that women are men's glory .

    No equality at all but complementary functions.

    I really think that God made Adam superior . Anyway ,we women love men who are a bit 'more' than us. It's reassuring and stengthening.

    Thank God for his amazing creation.

  • @framboise595 amen to that sister

  • @framboise595 I'm sorry, but I disagree with you. Women are not equal and will never be equal.That is feminist teaching.Women should not have rights to education(collage),voting,driv­ing cars,money,owning property/business,custody of the children or any legal ground at all.The only thing women are here on this planet to do is obey men,cook,clean and have men's off springs.That is a true place for women on this planet.

  • @billthemisogynist Um.. bill. God loves men and women equally. Where do you get the idea that women can not get an education? That is not in the word. As for voting that is up to the government to deside who can vote. Women not able to drive cars is ridiculous since cars have only exsisted for like a hundred years. as for owning property read Number 27:6-11 as for businesses look up Lydia. All wives have the right to food and shelter and above all else Men are commanded to love their wives.

  • @djinnwalker

    Did you know that there are no women in the scripture that did a miracle without first submiting to the will of a man of hvhY?

    1Tim.2

    [12] But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

    Maybe you should check yourself before you wreck yourself

  • @djinnwalker

    1. I never said females were evil I said they had less authority

    2. Adam sinned willingly while eve was tricked

    3. It was the sons of god that took the daughters of men

    4 Satan is neither male or female. He has a masculine pronoun to show authority same as hvhY

    5 I never said women were evil you need to rewatch the video.

  • I love this video and the message you brought through, but you totally got one thing wrong: Joyce Meyers does not teach men, she teaches women; it's just that there are Christian women out there that love her and drag their husbands, brothers, and fathers to go see her at her conferences so that men can learn what message is being taught to their female loved ones. I REPEAT: JOYCE MEYERS DOES NOT PREACH TO OR TEACH MEN, SHE TEACHES WOMEN ONLY! Keep the messages coming

  • Brother, as a new Christian, you always send me running to my bible to read more.

  • @user12348071

    I hope your not complaining?

  • @sixthheretic Of course not. I don't want to be one of the people who say "Lord lord" but but not to the Father's bidding. Being new to Christianity I feel like I've got so much to catch up on.

  • @user12348071

    Just take it one step at a time and avoid condemning yourself for the things you are not yet able to do

  • Well said!!! Totally agree with you 100%

  • @billthemisogynist

    awesome dude

  • You would not let a women have authority..... You have to have permission first pal. And i'm not talking about your make believe sky daddy. The only thing you need to get control on is your insecurity, and lack of self esteem. You need to get a check on your shit and wake the fuck up.

  • @zuniga6412

    Did you read the title of this video? It says christian woman. If you are not a chistian then this video doesnt apply to you. Sorry it offended you.but you are entitled to your believes as well as I am. I just hope next time you can do it with out the name calling.

  • @sixthheretic Dude... no one falls for this shit, you know that. Just because you have a sack doesn't mean that your better than women or more important or superior. Your just another dude who feels the need to believe a silly book written by man for men so that you can feel like the big kid on campus. You need to find another hobby.

  • @zuniga6412 A lot of women and men know feminist/feminism is wrong!!! We will destroy feminist/ feminism,so your libral days are coming to an end.

  • @billthemisogynist

    We dont have to destroy them it will destroy itself we just have to be patient. Patience is a virtue right?

  • @sixthheretic being patient is not my strong point,lol...But if I have to I will...But hope it happens before I loose another wife to this feminist/feminism world...

  • @billthemisogynist " We will destroy feminism " You sound like one of those kids robot cartoons.LOL... You have to grow up. Your so intimidated by women. Don't be so paranoid, they won,t beat ya up pal. Chill out.

  • Josh, how are you? I'll write you privately so I have more space but I thought I would comment on here as well. A few things...now even a well versed Hebrew scholar will say that mosaic law specifically was created for a temporary solution. As far as Paul is concerned wasn't it common for men to shave their heads? The womans hair is her covering so why does she need something else? Also the abuse issue. Josh she is free to marry if her man is not Godly. Abuse certainly is not Godly.

  • @cymbeli

    1. I dont care what a hebrew scholar will say

    2. It was common to shave your head after taking or finishing a nazzerite vow but that was the only time it was done in the hebrew culture

    3Read the verse the hair is a covering given to her by hvhY the headcovering is a covering showing her submission to her husband. If she submits to both she needs be covered by both.

    4. She is only set free if the unbeliever departs. She must be abandoned and not be the one abandoning

  • @sixthheretic If the head covering is given by Yaweh then why would she need an additional head covering unless it is an aid to society....what if she's praying in private? Why would God need this? Or are you saying specifically in the churches? And how can a woman stay in submission to a man if he's not even living in a Godly manner? This contradicts the whole point of submission. I'm not talking about a man back sliding a bit, I mean a man that is completely destructive. Then she's aiding him.

  • @cymbeli

    The head covering is a symbol of her submission and is to be worn when you pray. if you pray with out stoping as scripture says then you will be wearing the headcovering a while. But in 1cor 1 it talks about the headcovering being a symbol. Which means it is there for others to see. If there are no others then there is no need for a symbol. A woman who has a ungodly man in authority over her she must do his will until what he commands her to do contradicts the will of hvhY.

  • man with long hair is disrespectful, so why don't you start from  yourself

  • @22october2009wedding

    Dude learn your greek. You just sound like a moron when you say stuff like that. Kosmos is in refrence to the worldly culture at the time the laws said it was a sin to round the corners or your head or mar the corners of your beard

  • you are nuts

  • Men are pussies this age because it's design to be. ONE great example with on food system being so toxic has BPA that causes men to be feminine as well as mentaly. Very wealthy individuals (bankers) have agendas.

  • @IblewuponyourfaceIII

    good to know

  • I would be willing to bet you have exceptionally small genitalia, hence your insecurity and inferiority complex. Oops I'm not supposed to talk am I..esp when I speak the truth..about your tiny pee pee.

  • @MeredithOD

    Well there is no way you could be a christian with a mouth like that. You talk like a whore.

  • @sixthheretic What a degrading and judgmental word. Not that I'd expect any better from you.

  • @MeredithOD

    Well you reap what you sow. you speak to me in a dregrading and judgemental fashion that is what you get in return. Wow name calling. Not the most mature of arguments but I can accommodate you

  • @sixthheretic All of them are whores first,anything else second

  • @grengerx

    I think that is a little hateful dont you think

  • Insane beliefs beget insane attitudes and behaviour.

  • @keithmentium

    I would not call it insane I would rather think of it as radical

  • Insane.

  • Why should the rest of the world conform to your scriptures or the ones you want taught, you are so up yourself, leave us alone.

  • @tragichug

    I never said that the rest of the world had to conform to my scripture. All I care about is hypocracy. If a person says the believe all scripture I am going to make sure they BELIEVE ALL SCRIPTURE. If a person doesnt believe scripture I really dont care my videos are not for them

  • I am not trying to convert anyone, what religion am I trying to convert them too. I am just pointing out how foolish all the Christians are, I dont care if they keep believing this crap all there lives, I dont care if they live or die. Christians are the ones who force thier thoughst on us.

  • @tragichug

    Trying to convert us to aitheism maybe. If you didnt care you would not stay here constantly trying to force your beliefs on us.

  • And to the samurai, no we dont need any books on the Spag Monster to prove it, you quoting the bible as proof of God is like Hitler quoting Mien Kampf to support his own beliefs. You cant use your own false propaganda as proof. The sooner Christians learn that and the sooner they stop being an insidious movement that tries to convert everyone or enforce their views and morality on others, then the sooner we may let it survive the purges that are to come.

  • @tragichug I find it funny that you think we are out to convert you when you come on to my video and make comments on my thread and attack and try to convert those that were just minding their own business until you showed up. So why dont you stop forceing your views and morality down our throat and take some of your own advice.

  • however when talking about head coverings and speaking in church i believe during that time ppl were speaking out of turn and that the letter was written to the church of CORINTH if im not mistaken to ensure that the church maintained order.

  • @blackprincess212006

    Yes it was written to corinth but if we use the excuse that it was not written to us the whole pauline epistles disapear. Romans ephesians galations. Either it all still applies or none of it does.

  • @sixthheretic ok so in response to that when in thes 5 its says pray without ceasing does that mean that every time i want to pray say, when im driving or eating should i rush for something to cover my head? in fear of sinning against God?

  • @blackprincess212006

    If you are praying without ceasing then your head should be covered without ceasing. With one caviot. it says that the covering is a sign of submission to your husband. So if you are alone you do not have to cover for their is no one to see your sign.

  • i agree with you about the submission but i think that the problem women have is men tend to be more domineering than loving. its equally important to emphasize husbands love your wives.

  • @blackprincess212006

    It is equally impoprtant but everyone else teaches that husbands are to love their wives. and no one teaches that wives are to submit to their husbands in all things. So until the rest of the world starts teaching even the scripture that people dont want to hear. I will be here pulling up the slack.

  • @sixthheretic dude, you're obviously unable to understand scripture

  • @valegorn

    Or maybe it is you that is unable to understand scripture?

  • But I will extend the olive branch to the mindless Christians, I invite all Christians to attend a Buddhist temple and learn the teachings of Buddha. Its my obligation as a Buddhist to save you from you evil and corrupt beliefs, we love you and want to save you. Havent you seen the Buddhist going from door to door like the Mormons and Jehovahs?

  • Rubbish anything that can be witten by one to be read by another can be misinterpreted, thats why we have so many Christians sects, they cannot agree but all want little brainless minions that Christian followers are as their sheep.

  • @Mulvl1

    The reason there are so many sects is because everyone misinterprets scripture. they discard any scriupture that disagree with what they feel. That is not a godly attitude. That is the unforgivable sin according to the bible.

  • Truth is Angel calls rubbish that which he fails to comprehend, its ok not everyone is as smart as me, back to choking on your boyfriends dick Angel.

  • @boysoldierwar

    You need to stop saying things like this

  • @sixthheretic No he doesnt, its free speech, now we see the true Christian dogma, conformity by force and coercion.

  • Buddhists regard postulating the existence of ātman as undesirable, as they believe it provides the psychological basis for attachment and aversion. Buddhism sees the apparent self (our identification as souls) as a grasping after a self — i.e., inasmuch as we have a self, we have it only through a deluded attempt to shore it up.

  • @boysoldierwar

    You are talking as much rubbish as when christians order people to repent

  • @angeltears87 How can we trust a man who fucks other men, you are sick Angeltears, the Christians atleast love you, the real people like me dont though. You are against religion because you have a sickness that is clearly rejected under their teachings. I can agree with them on that point.

  • @boysoldierwar

    I am female.

  • @angeltears87 Nope you are a gay male.

  • @boysoldierwar

    Your irrational hatred of gays shows how unbuddhist you are. It is quite amusing...

  • With the doctrine of anatta (Pāli; Sanskrit: anātman) Buddhism maintains that the concept of ātman is unnecessary and counterproductive as an explanatory device for analyzing action, causality, karma, and rebirth. Buddhists account for these and other self-related phenomena by means such as pratitya-samutpāda, the skandhas, and, for some schools, a pudgala.

  • Buddha denied it even existed, the concept of soul was debunked by him, back to class for you. Atleast I am not a faggot like you.

  • @boysoldierwar

    Ok no name calling or I will ban you

  • @boysoldierwar

    Never claimed it was unchanging in the slightest. You are as bad as the christians.

  • Ok by gotta go to work now have fun with each other. love you guys.... peace.

  • If you are a Buddhist who worships or preys to Buddha, then you are fake and wrong and have been tricked.

  • How do we know that Jesus claimed to be the son of God? Are we to trust the written word of man? What about the fear of false prophets?

  • Ok to many ppl talking asking questions one at a time please.Don't need to get you guys mixed up lol

  • @samuraioj Yes you wait til I tell you can answer Samurai, this is my show.

  • @boysoldierwar later man... it was fun

  • I am a Buddhist so I know what he taught, dont confuse the Relgion of Buddhism with his teachings. Read up on the Atman concepts.

  • @boysoldierwar

    I don't think you know in the slightest.

  • @angeltears87 Well what you think is immaterial to me, read the earliest teachings of Buddha and you will see. Look at Nepalese Buddhism on the other hand, totally wrong. Human nature to twist the taechings to suit their agenda, you can see it in all Relgions.

  • @boysoldierwar

    You are claiming that buddhists don't believe in reincarnation. That is just absurd.

  • @angeltears87 I am talking about the soul or Atman that Buddha spoke of, never said that reincarnation was not a Buddhist concept, but there are many different sects of Buddhism, not all are correct, as with any philosphy it is open to interpretaion.

  • @boysoldierwar

    Then my point is proven.

  • @angeltears87 No silly, try and keep up, Buddha denied the existance of the enduring Atman, he said that we are selfish and selfless at the same instant. Reincarnation is as described by me and taught by the Buddha.

  • @boysoldierwar

    Reincarnation is a central tenet of buddhism...you admitted it...

  • @angeltears87 Nope never said such a thing, but keep trying, you look foolish when you misquote people. The cental tenet of true buddhism is "Seeing".

  • @boysoldierwar

    I am not paying much attention to be honest. your beliefs are just as illogical as the christians

  • @boysoldierwar

    Ok you are done you can not talk to people like that on my thread. Bye bye now.

  • @boysoldierwar

    There is only one way to interpret the bible. if anything is misinterpreted it would contradict other scriptures on the same subject.

  • Delusions that your Yahweh is anything other than a made up being, like the Easter Bunny or the Boogie man LOL. Thats why these religious types get at kids when they are young, they will believe anything an older person tells them is real. Thast why they believe in fairytales.

  • @boysoldierwar

    Yeah the biggest difference between what I believe and the easter bunny and the boogiew man and even the spagetti monster is that my God has no form. He is intangible and invisable and can be shone by no image. God is beyound mans imagination. Everything else is idolatry

  • @sixthheretic No God is mans imagination, not beyond our imagination, mate you are a fool, youa re weak thats why you need this intangible crutch of the pefect God, well he aint perfect, its in the lies you write in your own bibles. I dare God to strike me down now. Nope still here. Only people who fall for relgion are weak idiots. You prove my point by breathing.

  • He wont convert us ever angeltears but its fun to disprove their beliefs by our sheer logical reasoning.

    Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.

    Religion is answers that may never be questioned.

  • Comment removed

  • Way smarter than Jesus thats for sure, and Buddha is as provable as the son of God as any other. Just keep sucking up the lies silly Christians.

  • @figjamjkl Nope Buddha never claimed to be the only begotten son of Yahweh if he did show me a text of him saying that.

  • @samuraioj Anyone can claim that, thats the point, when people come out nowadays and claim to speak to God or be Jesus and tell us to repent, even Christians know they are loonies.

  • Buddhism is a good example, he was a man that cared about other people, stated clearly that he wasnt a God and didnt want to be deified, yet he was, his philosophical teachings were turned into a religion, against his intention. Maybe this Jesus was the same, Jesus's teachings according to the literature are very similar to Buddha's, and there is contention that Jesus travelled to the East and may have studied under Buddha in the missing years of his life.

  • @boysoldierwar Im not saying Buddha was a bad teacher.He probably had a lot of good lesson to learn.

  • @samuraioj All religions, including the false Buddhism that they made out of a philosphers teachings, exert control and influence over its followers, if you cant look at what happened in Buddhism and see that the same deception exists in your religion and all religion then thats your problem.

  • Point is the flying Spagetti monster is a s real as your Yahweh. The oint is the Spag monster passes all the tests of the false being created by man known as God. Honestly every culture has created Gods, yet they all claim theirs is the truth. Christians reject all other cultures depiction of the idea of God or Gods yet believe in their own, yet all have zero proof. If you cannot see the hypocrasy of your stand point then you truelly are brainwashed and need to be cleansed from this earth.

  • @boysoldierwar

    Wow cleansed from the earth huh? Sounds an awful lot like hate speech. I dont think

    I like your tone.

  • @akshunyob do you have any prove for your spaghetti monster God?Do you have any text or holy books so i can read about ur spaghetti monster God?Do u have thousands of years of spaghetti monster believers?What is the history of your God?Where is the geographical locations of your spaghetti monsters churches and temples???

  • @samuraioj

    None of what you stated here is actual evidence of veracity.

    People have believed in buddhism for thousands of years and I can show you the temples and the history. However you don't believe in that do you?

  • @angeltears87 Of course i believe Buddhism is a religion and it has the history to qualify as a religion. But i think you miss my point...Your spaghetti monster God has no history, you have not showed me anything about ur God.I don't think ur spaghetti monster God qualifies as a religion,sorry but i don't see how ur god can be equal to Yahweh.

  • Comment removed

  • @samuraioj

    I wasn't asking if you believe buddhism is a religion. I was asking if you believe in the teachings.

    I showed you a religion with history that you reject. It renders your argument void.

    I never mentioned having any god.

  • @angeltears87 actually you never asked me if i believe in the teachings."People have believed in Buddhism for thousands of years and they have temples and history"...That is what u stated and you asked me if i believe it. lol and i never said or rejected the history of Buddhism you just insinuated it. lol And how does showing me the history of Buddhism make my argument about the spaghetti monster void? LMAO i think your confusing yourself and you completely missed the point of my Questions.

  • @samuraioj

    Again. My question is do you think the teachings of buddha are true? Do you believe in karma and reincarnation?

  • @angeltears87 "AGAIN"...lol actually it is the first time you ask me if i think the teachings of Buddha are true.But i don't know much about the teachings of Buddha except karma and reincarnation.I don't believe in karma but i do believe in "What you weep you shall sow" and i don't believe in reincarnation but i do believe in resurrections...lol And how does showing me the history of Buddhism make my argument about the spaghetti monster void?btw Buddha is not a God,just putting that out there.

  • @samuraioj

    Your claim was that your god is mor elikely to exist then the flying spag monster because it has thousands of years of history and millions of followers and churches. I showed you another religion with all those things that you reject. showing your argument to be inconsistent and illogical.

  • @angeltears87 Yes.i don't believe or follow the teachings of Buddha and it has history and so does my faith but i reject most of Buddhism.But how does my rejection of Buddha make my argument to be inconsistent and illogical? BTW i never said Buddha never existed just putting that out there.I guess im saying that your spaghetti monster God doesn't exists or have any,what was it you said VERACITY.So how can u compare ur spaghetti monster God to Yahweh. Maybe u should look for a better argument.