@Kaiyazu Yes, the capital F notation is fairly common, and I see that used some on AP exams also. The concept, though, is what is critical, and the goal is for it to make sense, in either notation. Glad you liked the video!
@derekowens, surely you are the bestest tutor that I have seen so far. The way you explain makes maths soo easy. If you were my primary school teacher and taught me this at the age of 7, I am sure I would of passed Calculus course even then, But I have to say I owe you for your time and doing this for students. Thanks a lot, ur truely a LIFESAVER!
Derek, can you please tell me what software you are using? I really appreciate it - your handwriting is something out of this world btw. I love the selection of colours as well. I use smooth draw myself, but i find it lacking in many respects.
There are no words to explain how much I liked this video. Thank you SOO much.
But I have a question. In the second example, we are asked to find the velocity at t=7 sec. So why do we need to find the area under the curve (or the change)? I think we can directly find g(7).
@MsBabyBlue0 The area under the acceleration curve is what gives us the change in velocity, and we find this area by finding the antiderivative and evaluating, which is what I think you mean by finding g(7). If it starts with a velocity of 0, then the change in velocity from t=0 to t=7 will be the velocity at t=7. Hope that helps, DO.
I always thought Khanacademy was good while although slow, but this is so much better, more professional, and both neat and concise. I know I'm subscribing.
Of all the Calculus videos I've seen on Youtube, yours are definitely my favorite. Concise, clear, conceptual - they're really good for understanding the concepts. I'm going to school for engineering and plan on viewing your Physics videos soon! Right now, I'm hoping to survive Calc. 2 online over the summer... Thanks!
You are correct, there certainly should be a constant! However, when we are calculating a _definite_ integral, the constant disappears. It disappears because it would show up once in g(b) and again in g(a), and we subtract.
I'm going to redo these videos soon, and I'll address the constant of integration when I do.
I LOVED THIS VIDEO!!! Except the Anti-derivative sign is a capital F in the books..idk why haha
Kaiyazu 1 month ago
@Kaiyazu Yes, the capital F notation is fairly common, and I see that used some on AP exams also. The concept, though, is what is critical, and the goal is for it to make sense, in either notation. Glad you liked the video!
DO
derekowens 1 month ago
@derekowens, surely you are the bestest tutor that I have seen so far. The way you explain makes maths soo easy. If you were my primary school teacher and taught me this at the age of 7, I am sure I would of passed Calculus course even then, But I have to say I owe you for your time and doing this for students. Thanks a lot, ur truely a LIFESAVER!
balochan1 1 month ago
Derek, can you please tell me what software you are using? I really appreciate it - your handwriting is something out of this world btw. I love the selection of colours as well. I use smooth draw myself, but i find it lacking in many respects.
Byron10301 3 months ago
But why is the change in velocity the area under the acceleration function? This doesn't make any sense!!
elizze6 4 months ago
derekowens for president
snowboarder9901 8 months ago
There are no words to explain how much I liked this video. Thank you SOO much.
But I have a question. In the second example, we are asked to find the velocity at t=7 sec. So why do we need to find the area under the curve (or the change)? I think we can directly find g(7).
MsBabyBlue0 1 year ago
@MsBabyBlue0 The area under the acceleration curve is what gives us the change in velocity, and we find this area by finding the antiderivative and evaluating, which is what I think you mean by finding g(7). If it starts with a velocity of 0, then the change in velocity from t=0 to t=7 will be the velocity at t=7. Hope that helps, DO.
derekowens 1 year ago
Wow, these are amazing. I love your quick, clear, and clean drawings. what do you use? Very easy to understand.
xROFLawsonx 1 year ago
Awesome video. You need to work on those allergies though!
mzellars822 1 year ago
I always thought Khanacademy was good while although slow, but this is so much better, more professional, and both neat and concise. I know I'm subscribing.
mariomaruf 1 year ago
thank you sir,
Mrmeanjean 1 year ago
wow, you did a better job than kahn academy. very clear and quick
BYMYSYD 1 year ago
the part 1 is misleading, this is the Fundamental Theorem of Caluculus part 2.
leoncio91 1 year ago 2
You make Calculus sound great. Thanks.
cheersfornads 1 year ago
can someone tell me where he got his anitderivative value of xcubed from , i get the rest of it but cant figure that bit out ??
TheGlenn9 1 year ago
@TheGlenn9 (x^n+1)/n+1
bitty88 1 year ago
Great! Thanks very much!
uitlegklas 1 year ago
Comment removed
wadihase 2 years ago
:-)
illmatic33 2 years ago
Of all the Calculus videos I've seen on Youtube, yours are definitely my favorite. Concise, clear, conceptual - they're really good for understanding the concepts. I'm going to school for engineering and plan on viewing your Physics videos soon! Right now, I'm hoping to survive Calc. 2 online over the summer... Thanks!
jamescboyd 2 years ago 2
Thanks man,, Great Teaching
bebancos 2 years ago
You are correct, there certainly should be a constant! However, when we are calculating a _definite_ integral, the constant disappears. It disappears because it would show up once in g(b) and again in g(a), and we subtract.
I'm going to redo these videos soon, and I'll address the constant of integration when I do.
derekowens 3 years ago
just this comment was helpful even. no one ever bothered to clarify what happened to adding a constant during the area problems when using integrals.
xxpettheemokidxx 3 years ago
should the antiderivative not have a constant factor added for the general form of the antiderivative,
CigarStudLasVegas 3 years ago
thank you
ayezeee123 3 years ago
These "Fundamental Theorem" videos are about to get redone. I think I can improve the explanation.
derekowens 3 years ago