Well, Tech did win 2 of their last 4 games this year to make a bowl, and beat Syracuse 51-14 in the bowl to go 7-5. Still cant believe how under-utilized Calvin Johnson was though.
I agree that they missed that call.. I don't know if it necessarily cost Georgia Tech the game, since they would have had the ball at the 20... but it would have kept it interesting.
Yeah, in today's world of instant replay, that would have been overturned. Wonder if that might have changed things, since it would have been GT ball on a touchback.
Ah, you're letting the bees get to you. Given the way Reggie was playing, he just would have thrown another pick. They got off a couple decent passes but there was just not enough time to tie it up.
Now, if we had only been up by three, THAT would have been interesting.
At the time of the play, it appeared to me that VT gave up on the recovery because it was already called a touchdown. Had the play continued, VT would have recovered--hokie touchdown, NOT a touchback.
In my view it would have been more a travesty had it been reviewed and called a touchback, because the only reason Hokies didn't fall on it was the bad call in the first place: instead of the refs handing the game to the Hokies, the refs may have handed the game to the Jackets.
I'm glad the Reggie Ball years are over.
ABGA8 2 years ago 2
Well, Tech did win 2 of their last 4 games this year to make a bowl, and beat Syracuse 51-14 in the bowl to go 7-5. Still cant believe how under-utilized Calvin Johnson was though.
tedtube100 2 years ago
So what if it was a fumble they didnt call it. besides that was still a great play by Minor.
DAVISELEMENT101BRO 4 years ago
Virginina Tech won by luck at the end. That was the call that might have saved the game for G.A. Tech
charlescaras333 4 years ago
Yeah every time we kill yall its luck. Yall won two years ago but thats the last time for a while.
BleedBLUE87 4 years ago
I agree that they missed that call.. I don't know if it necessarily cost Georgia Tech the game, since they would have had the ball at the 20... but it would have kept it interesting.
vttym 5 years ago
Should Not have Counted. Fumble at the end. The refs didn't see that. That cost Tech the game. I was at that game.
charlescaras333 5 years ago
sorta forgot how obvious a fumble that was there at the end....oh well, we still kicked ass! Go Hokies!!!
petetdx 5 years ago
Yeah, in today's world of instant replay, that would have been overturned. Wonder if that might have changed things, since it would have been GT ball on a touchback.
vttym 5 years ago
Ah, you're letting the bees get to you. Given the way Reggie was playing, he just would have thrown another pick. They got off a couple decent passes but there was just not enough time to tie it up.
Now, if we had only been up by three, THAT would have been interesting.
petetdx 5 years ago
At the time of the play, it appeared to me that VT gave up on the recovery because it was already called a touchdown. Had the play continued, VT would have recovered--hokie touchdown, NOT a touchback.
DrkElf79 4 years ago
But had it been reviewed and actually watched the play, it would have been ruled a fumble and thus would be a touchback.
peanutbutterjelly76 3 years ago
In my view it would have been more a travesty had it been reviewed and called a touchback, because the only reason Hokies didn't fall on it was the bad call in the first place: instead of the refs handing the game to the Hokies, the refs may have handed the game to the Jackets.
usnbostx2 2 years ago