Added: 3 years ago
From: jareisman
Views: 34,156
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (229)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • theyre angry Kinsey said kids are sexual from birth? have they heard of Freud?!

  • Wait, theyre mad because he found out the truth about people?

  • Wow. I didn't realize there still existed so many repressed people. I'll bet the producers of this video are bible punching, right wing, moralists. I could tell that this clip was full of shit by the narrator's voice. The whole thing was poorly done ... very contrived.

  • Verdict: some social conservatives will go to any ends to slander scientists when they DON'T LIKE their findings.

    The world is a kinky place.  Sorry?

  • Comment removed

  • cont. but that doesn't mean that Kinsey abused kids. He interviewed people with their consent about their sexual experiences. I'm willing to wager some of those people were sexually abused as kids. He also interviewed pedophiles, but then so do police. Should they all be accused of pedophilia now? And don't get me started on the Catholic clergy! I know cheap shot....

    And wth is a pansexual view?? Pansexuals are merely people who's attraction does not care about the various sexual issues we have

  • Oh for the love of all that's good in this world! Stop with the blatant slanderous accusations already! Don't get me wrong, pedophiles should all die horribly, and while his research isn't my view of "moral" he is correct in saying children are sexual beings At least in the biological sense.Saying they aren't is an insult to child abuse survivors as a big part of the shame they carry is the fact that they "biologically responded." Are they emotionally capable of dealing with stimulation? No.

  • I firmly believe that Kinsey solicited the assistance of those who were willing to perform sexual acts on children. I do not believe that his knowledge of sexual behavior in children was received exclusively from the second hand, reported accounts provided by King.

    At this point the damage that Kinsey has done to this country is irreversible, and what some would call the result of a needed sexual revolution, is actually a risky and skilful catering to the darkest parts of the human psyche.

  • Kinsey and his investigators only interviewed people who engaged in a wide range of sexual behavior. They would not turn anyone in to the police because subjects were guaranteed anonymity. A man by the name of "King" is who gave them a record of his sexual contacts with children. King did the timing, and he recorded it. This info was not in the slanted film.

  • Kinsey was only investigating the sexuality of human beings, and then reporting his findings. Some would prefer to believe that children have no sexual thoughts until they are of legal age, but Kinsey found this not to be the case. Kinsey was recording sexual behavior as it occurred, not as society would wish it to be, Obviously many prefer The Fair And Balanced Approach. This video is blatantly biased!!

  • @valis1949 The video asks an important question that your trying to dismiss by your comments. How did Kinsey collect data on children- how he used pedophiles with stopwatches to record orgasms even to where a 4 month old has recorded 26 orgasms in a 24 hour period. It was controversial the ethics used and the fact that admitted academic dishonesty was used as an attempt apologetics.

    The fair and balanced aproach is called fact checking- Fact are facts and your being dismissive.

  • Thumbs up if the Alex Jones Show brought you here.

  • to theAmazingtarman, YES... homosexuals are in FACT sexual perverts.

  • @smp156 your dad wasnt saying that when i was pumpin his ass full of kum last night.

  • This is what corrupted the Church and gave a spike to sex abuse in clerical circles.

  • Idiots' "documentary" this is. :)

  • and from which the 'practising' paedophiles of Kinsey's day are not so free at ease to practise their perversions. He obviously did not condone sexual acts that cause physical and mental harm, however he was a scientist, the very fact that humans carry out these acts mean that they are worth studying. To understand and prevent.

  • When Kinsey studied Paedophilia the society was so prudish (apparently not much has changed looking at this enlightening documentary) that sex was feared to such an extent it wasn't talked about. Paedophilia was one of concepts glossed over. It happens, and its vile and evil (anagram!) the very fact that Kinsey could study 'practising' paedophiles is a testament to the fact that due it being glossed over it happened without consequence. From Kinsey we have a more open discourse--

  • GARbag!!!!!

  • CHRISTIAN PROPAGANDA. FEAR ITS CRAP.

  • @TylerIsHackinCool Heres kinsey's own defenitions of the reactions of children as young as two months old regarding their orgasms.

    he had 6 categories of orgasm:

    1) Screaming

    2) Writing in pain

    3) Hysterics

    4) Convulsions

    5) Fainted

    6 ) Struck the partner

    Dont have to be Christian to find this bestial and disgusting.

  • ... so is anyone else a 3 on the kinsey scale? ;D

  • This is Christian gobbleby-goo

  • @geneticcontroller he had 6 categories of orgasm:

    1) Screaming

    2) Writing in pain

    3) Hysterics

    4) Convulsions

    5) Fainted

    6 ) Struck the partner

    These were is guidlines for children, ranging from 14 years old to TWO MONTHS old. 

  • Who are these people? and why did they have to point out that the director was gay, does that really give any support to their argument? so what

  • @ boobooday- the people in the 40s and 50s were NOT as prudish as Kinsey claimed. They just believe that sex was to be saved for committed monogamous relationships. That was common place and the ideal, not the exception. Kinsey's methods were bias. It would be like a Christian scientist wanting to prove that most ppl are religious, so he ends up surveying mostly ppl walking out of church every Sunday.

  • @Blink316E- your comments alone tell a story..it's like a "truth hurts" reaction. Sorry to tell you, right-wing buss or not, Reisman can and has backed up every word and claim. And right now, Indiana legislation is looking to stop tax payer money that's been funding the Kinsey Institute. The evidence against Kinsey is concrete and overwhelming to deny

  • This is just more christian, one sided, biased bullshit. No one knows the truth, so fuck this bullshit. I can't watch this, fuck it

  • 95% of men had committed sexual offenses at the time of Kinsey's research, because at that time, MASTURBATION was a crime (Kinsey was referring to this, having met young men who were INCARCERATED after they were caught masturbating). Probably a condition you prudes would like to return to, eh?

  • @boobooday So true. Kinsey noted in one of his lectures that he was contacted by a man who was incarcerated as a felon because his mother-in-law didn't like him and went to the police and accused him of performing oral sex on his own wife!

  • @buddmar I worked on the PBS documentary about Kinsey while I was at Indiana University. The man was driven by his desire to end the suffering caused by the totally ridiculous prudishness about sex in our culture. I don't think people realize how repressive the culture really was before Kinsey. You example is an excellent illustration of that!

  • It is character assassination, and what an easy target: a man who has been dead for something like 55 years and cannot defend himself. Oh well. However there is still The Kinsey Institute at the University of Indiana, and his books are still in print so Kinsey's research has stood the test of time. This recent diatribe against Kinsey has a sinister hidden agenda: homophobic bigotry, not unlike the antisemitism of the Holocaust Deniers.

  • This is a character assassination. Unfortunately for the perpetrators the truth is only a couple of clicks away.

    Kinsey hepled to liberate a sexually repressed society.

    The claims made in this video are utterly ridiculous.

  • @allthewine

    YOU MORON, HE DIDN"T LIBERATE ANY "sexually repressed society" you clown, this guy is a follower of ALLISTER CROWLEY, IE a Satanist. This guy is pure scumbag and social engineer. Society didn't need any "liberation" from some perverted libertine like this clown.

  • @gosciu555

    A santanist. Come on man. You fucking child. Grow up.

  • @allthewine

    Who the fuck are you talking to? Do you even know who that was? Eh? There is no doubt that

    1. Kinsey was a follower of Allister Crowley

    2. Crowley was a satanist/occultist kook.

    You people belive that some pervert like Kinsey is somehow "liberating" something. you're such DUPES. This person is an operative. This whole idiot hippy crowd are a bunch of targets. GROW UP.

  • @gosciu555

    Who the fuck am I talking talk? A complete and utter moron by the look of things.

    Kinsey's legacy lives on. No amount of mud slinging will ever change that. You will just have to deal with it.

  • @gosciu555 What a "crock of s--t". Cite your sources. In the biographies of Kinsey by Dr. Wardell Pomeroy and James H. Jones there is no mention whatsoever of Crowley. The smear campaign is just an attempt by ultraconservative anti-gay bigots to defame the University of Indiana's Kinsey Institute and legitimize their own prejudiced point of view.

  • Hahaha nothing like the truth to rile people up. His own book shows he had children molested for his purposes and even recorded the, ahem, results. Showing this is right wing? Well, all you Kinsey supporters, I guess you think having all these pedophiles on the streets are fine with you. congratulations, your hero helped make that happen.

  • Alfred C. Kinsey was a hero. This is extreme right-wing  slander. This is a pathetic "revisionist" agenda by people who are no better "Holocaust Deniers".

  • @buddmar

    WTF are you talking, if anyone is "extreme right" ITS KINSEY, who was spnsored by various oligarchs TO PERVERT SOCIETY, its shocking how many dupes there are out there. The whole "free love" nonsense is an exercise in demoralization. I can't believe how many people are duped by this. THe case is similar with "global warming" idiot hippy dupes don't understand they're being used.

  • Anyone who defends Kinsey is a mental case 

  • I've never seen a more biased documentary in my life.

  • Liberals have been spreading their filth for decades and we're just now seeing the damage of all their disgusting philosophies. They will be met with the truth. They will be shut down like they try to do to everyone else. They will be silenced like they've done to conservatives for 60 years. God will be put back in the schools and the crap that they promote will be thrown in the dumpsters where it belongs once and for all. Don't like that, good, cause we don't like your garbage either.

  • @Broughttolight

    Its not "liberals" or whatever, its the freaking Rockefeller USING these various left lib type characters to take them away from doing anything useful and into this nonsense. All these people like the Hippies, feminists, are followers of Allister Crowley.

  • i never knew people could get so worked up about a movie

  • ALL OF YOU FILTH WHO AGREE WITH THIS VERMIN ARE DOG SHIT AND A DISEASE UPON THIS PLANET! HE D.I.D. ENCOURAGE PEDOVILES TO RAPE KIDS AND HE WAS PROVIDING THEM WITH STOP WATCHES TO TIME WHEN THE CHILD HAD AN 'ORGASM'???!!!!! WTF! CHILDREN THAT YOUNG "CAN'T" HAVE ORGASMS"!! YOU FILTH THINK A CHILD IS HAVING AN ORGASM WHEN HE/SHE BEATS YOUR CHEST WITH THEIR FISTS ??? OR CRIES HYSTERICALLY??? OR FAINTS??? FUCKING PARASITES!! YOU ALL NEED TO BE EXTERMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH!!!

  • @wilma111 Dude..calm down

  • He was a homosexual, thats why he had a wife

  • @gray70

    absolutely. kinsey had not set out to explore the sexual morality of the day, even less to guess at what it should be like. instead he did his best to represent sexual behavior (the clue is in the title). the study itself has sampling problems, certainly: the researchers had to use convicts and prostitutes since not too many people were willing to be open about sex. but the sample itself being huge, this made little difference. it was a fair bit of research and the first of its kind.

  • they're saying that kinsey wasn't credible because he said 95% of males committed sexual crimes...

    ...yeah, NO SHIT!! maybe because...um...back in the 1940's the sex laws were so much stricter than they are now? (i.e. masturbation, adultery, fornication...all illegal) this is right-wing bullshit.

  • I am a moderate who leans left. I am very accepting of homosexuals and lesbians. To me, where sexual orientation comes from shouldn't matter. It's a civil rights issue, and that's it, However, I have done enough research on Kinsey to know that the conservatives are 100% correct about him and non-bias when presenting all the facts. Gays and Lesbians need to find a new hero, because (tbc...)

  • using Kinsey's "research" as the foundation of human sexuality seems like a desperate reach for approval. It also makes the left, including gays and lesbians, look just as bad and guilty as the religious right when it comes to using false info, lies and sentiment as "fact" in order to manipulate while protesting for their rights.

  • it's all Greek to me, and I'm Irish

  • Even if Judith can destroy the porno industry...those images will stay in our brains forever and ever!!!

    you may destroy our movies and magazines but not our memories!!!!

  • Child Molester SCUM

  • Alfred Kinsey, Wardell Pomeroy, et al have done mankind a great service by studying human sexuality - another facet of the human experience. The study was conducted in the first place so that people could understand themselves and each other in a more intelligent way. Pity for any self loathing, typically self repressed and equally hypocritical knucklehead not to recognize the importance of it all. When will people stop with the self imposed stupidity for the sake of maintaining the "norm?"

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • I have studied Sigmund Freud for years and i can say for sure he was a serious resercher of human sexuality; many people accused him of being a pervert but those accusations were ridicolous. Since i've never studied anything about Kinsey, do u think it's the same for him? Apparently there's a lot of controversy concerning his work, especially for the bias used and his apparent involvement with pedophiles (wikipedia tells he decided to not report 9 of them to authorities).

  • The Kinsey group made a commitment to remain neutral by not judging anyone who's sexual histories they recorded for their research. Right or wrong, to them, it was the research which was the most important thing. There was friction within the group when it came to taking the sexual histories of pedophiles - understandably so. They interviewed thousands of people about all aspects of their sexualities. The study was about obtaining an accurate representation

    of sexuality among our species.

  • Continued from "The Kinsey group....."

    I have read both Kinsey books on sexuality of the male and female. I have also read a few biographies about Kinsey, himself. I would have to say that he and his colleagues were very seriously committed to their work and it's findings. This was not a frivolous endeavor by any means. They received and continue to receive so much flak because some people can't reconcile the IDEAL with the REALITY.

  • This piece of trash is in itself sexually perverse.  It is right-wing psychological porn.

  • These right wing christian assholes have LOST! they have to get that through their fucking heads and stopped trying to shove their bullshit, UNSCIENTIFIC, world view down our throats.

  • How can that man say he may have died of self inflected wounds, fucking piece of shit he died of a heart discease! It's disgusting to destroy someone like that just because of your stupid biased views

  • Okay what kinsey wanted to do was to prove that children were sexually active, they have needs too, he never said "Go ahead and fuck some children'' fucking church retards

  • Church bullshit... its amazing how their still trying to blindfold the population and cant face the fact that they cant repress the population anymore.

  • I am not defending Kinsey but this documentary is incredibly biased. They make it seem like Kinsey thought incest was good and everyone enjoys it but thats clearly not what he thought. They found a woman who didn't enjoy it and take what she is saying and make him seem like the devil himself.

  • I am always amazed that you will find people who will defend pedophiles. You would think that people would be happy that Kinsey's work has been exposed for what it really was. After all, who roots for a pedophile??? Instead, you have people attacking those who exposed the pedophilia. How shameful.

  • Hey, I actually AM interested in Kinsey, the truth though!

    When a doco like this comes along [that just barley conceals it's venom towards Kinsey] then

    YOU LOSE ALL CREDABILITY!

    I absolutely bet this is 'sponsored' by a church of some kind.

    IE No Cred!

  • this documentary is retarded. obviously, you guys are a bunch of people who judge people for who they are and a bunch of bible humpers

  • People who live in stained glass houses should not throw stones.

  • yes, Dr. Riesman deserves a lot of praise for exposing him as a fraud.

  • Facts are facts and Dr. Judith Rieman did a fantastic job of exposing the lies of Kinsey and his pedophiles, Nazi associates, homosexuals, and other fringe sexual pervert friends. Before you dismiss the messenger, read her book "Kinsey Crimes and Consequences" by Dr. Reisman.

    Sadly, some refuse to seek truth and instead prefer to remain ignorant. God told us, "My people are destroyed for a lack of knowledge." God is never wrong.

    Dr. Reisman's research is indisputable. Try as you may!

  • are you saying homosexuals are sexual perverts????fucking christ we are in 2010, grow up

  • @TheAmazingstarman what does the year have to do with a man having sex with another man where he defecates? no matter what year it is it's still unclean unsafe causes diseases like AIDS on top of many others and it's a sin...get your mind/body out of the gutter and if you're gonna keep it there don't try to force others to agree with your disgusting senseless filth.

  • @ConstellashunI'd like to quote and throw back at you: "get your mind/body out of the gutter and if you're gonna keep it there don't try to force others to agree with your disgusting senseless filth."

    There is nothing wrong in any way with being homosexual, bi-sexual or any other orientation. Your stone-age mentality is NOT welcome in the neoteric generation because it has been called out for the disgusting, oppressing, degrading, suppressing, violating of basic rights filth that is religion.

  • @SR0Penne0Brillo forget about religion and think about the diseases it causes that effect EVERYONE..you seem to over look that and attack religion because you have no logical argument for that like the rest of you self degrading homosexuals.

  • @Constellashun It's logic that defeats religion! I am bi-sexual, not homosexual. No, you have no logical defense for religion because there simply is none. Diseases? Religion is a disease, it's a plague, a sinister infection that has destroyed humanity at almost an entirety and oppresses humans to a degree that their lives are totally and utterly wasted from sheer ignorance, that beautiful, loving and free-minded people lose their lives to ignorance that you are displaying so brilliantly now.

  • @SR0Penne0Brillo you've just proven my point..

  • @Constellashun In what way?! I'm saying that the greater enemy, in fact the greatest in this world is religion. It is the responsibility of people WITH AIDs to keep themselves in check, to not spread it. Simply because some don't control themselves does not mean that you can judge an entire social class. In this case, those that have and spread AIDs (not all of whom are gay) are by far the lesser of two evils, when compared to the monster that is religion.

  • @SR0Penne0Brillo "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law"...moving on.

  • @Constellashun "Imagine there's no Heaven It's easy if you try No hell below us Above us only sky Imagine all the people Living for today Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Imagine all the people Living life in peace You may say that I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will be as one " I do imagine just that, and it's beautiful.
  • @SR0Penne0Brillo NWO it is...religion/morals will decline until no more. every adult/child will possess the decision to "Do what thou wilt" the mass orgy will begin then regret...sweet sweet poison,you've all had more then your share now it's time for the effects to show..you have cursed and spit at your only help,it was once opened now it is sealed.

  • @Constellashun Is that your attempt at sound literate? Because you still lack the basic skills of grammar and spelling. However the point is if you believe in fairy tales and conspiracies then fine, you waste your life all you like. You only get one, and if you spend all of it on your knees with your head in the ground, then that's your problem.

  • @SR0Penne0Brillo And you lack the basic skills of being a moral human and knowing that filthy sodomites like you will die from your disgusting sexual acts and blaspheming true Christianity,now Im not the most Christ like person out here but I do know right from wrong and you are the wrongest they come...Oh and please don't use phrases like "on your knees" with me you repulsive homosexual i find it disturbing..Well have fun battling HIV you vile self degrading faggot..Mom and Dad must be proud..

  • @Constellashun Haha you're so pathetic. I may be all those things to you, but I have already and will go on to accomplish more with my life than you can ever dream to in your current state. Go on living your meaningless life, when you're dead an gone, it'll be the beautiful people in the world that actually make a difference and are productive, that'll be around to enjoy the earth we had to share with cretins like yourself.

  • @SR0Penne0Brillo Im sorry but theirs nothing more senseless and pathetic then a homosexual wait a minute,yes there is,a bisexual which is even worse because you spread your diseases to straight women who in turn spread it to straight men,people like you are the reason why Aids is running rampid in the world so how can you be so pro life when you've been marked for death?.Your life sucks literally and figuratively,you fail at assuming mines but 2 things are certain i will die of old age,you? AIDS

  • @Constellashun Haha I don't have AIDs, I won't get AIDs because I'm not so fucking stupid that I wouldn't be cautious when it came to sex and I'd rather have AND spread AIDs than be a detrimental to the human race piece of shit like yourself.

  • @SR0Penne0Brillo having AND spreading AIDS IS detrimental to the human race you stupid filthy faggot..you're no better then this guy in the video smh sick bastard im done chatting with garbage like you.

  • @Constellashun And yet it wouldn't be nearly as bad as being YOU. Good, fuck off, no-one wants you.

  • @SR0Penne0Brillo no one wants Aids either...remember that.

  • @Constellashun You say that as though I have aids in a bag and I'm throwing it out over crowds of people. You're a fucking moronic and ignorant spack-head. I DO NOT HAVE AIDs. You however, are infected by religion, and hopefully it'll die with you, not to far in the future. I'm blocking communications with you now, so I don't have to put up with your uneducated prattling.

  • @Constellashun narrow minded Christian fuck, sort your life out.......Prick! 

  • @Harry8794 sound minded you immoral fuck...my life is pretty good how about yours you lifeless video game nerd?

  • @Constellashun one word that sums up people like like you......Cunts!

    I like the way you think i'm a video game nerd because I have videos of it on my Channel, your the sad fuck who goes on videos telling people they have AIDS, Go and grow up you weird fuck Tard

  • @Harry8794 dont send me another pm you fag im not interested in your feces sex you filthy homo.

  • @Constellashun

    By the way im not gay you could at least get it right :)

  • WINGNUTS ON THE MARCH !!

    This video was put out by a conservative Christian

    group that will never forgive Kinsey for stating that

    roughly 10% of men are gay or bisexual. Beware

    the HIDDEN AGENDA !

  • @mrsandoz And yet another lie that was exposed decades ago...the gay numbers are closer to 1 percent...not 10 percent...he lied about this to promote the gay agenda and yet your ilk still spout this lie....Truth means nothing to people that back this evil degenerate....unbelievable....­.

  • ahhh should have know the rockerfellers funded this sick bastard. burn the lot of them.

  • Opinion does not make it true . Facts and documentation only .

  • who cares what he did on his own time, he did much more good than bad

  • Kinsey has just unveiled the reality over the diversity of human sexual diversities.

  • this is so damn stupid.

    this research is inaccurate.

    to top it off if he had done that.

    he would have written it down in his research.

    this is all based on opinion not fact

  • Christ said that it is better to have never been born rather than corrupt a child. That is a terrifying judgement passed upon an evil man like Kinsey.For a few years of pleasure, money & fame this man threw away the most precious possession he had - his soul. Today, even decades after his death, his punishment is only just beginning, as it will always be. This will always be his hideous reality, to wail & cry & knash his teeth & to be tortured with remorse at never being able to climb out ofHell

  • Comment removed

  • Kinsey was a sub-human monster who gave us the destructive "sexual revolution". I have to shudder what awaited him at his Particular Judgement at his death. It is no coincidence that the Rockefeller Foundation bankrolled him. These people have as their goal the destruction of our civilization to usher in a new world order. To do that you destroy the moral order in society. In whatever hot corner of Hell Kinsey is in now he suffers the horrifying prospect of his damnation being endless agony.

  • HE WAS AN ALEISTER CROWLEY DEVOTEE

    you can see the photo of Kinsey and Kenneth Anger in the House of Crowley filming an practicing crowley sexual magik

  • KINSEY were a devotee of ALEISTER CROWLEY

  • this documentary is too biase ... protraying kinsey in a negative light without considering the most of his theories. they carried alot of weight in the scientific world. the documentary sounds too political ( conservatively influnced) overall really distorts the findings of kindsey

  • I agree

  • Right idea...wrong execution.

  • Look less at kinsey, look more about the overall message, atleast as I perceive it, that record of sexual data and histories, and it's openness, could educate people. I am skeptical about his famous scale, but I can respect his notions of people being able to be open to understanding of the reasons behind our sexualityand understanding how everyone is different. I'm sure all scientists have their dirty sides-and personal beliefswrong/right. To discredit what he did cuz of his sins is stupid.

  • Some people are saying "Kinsey was a pioneer." Being a "pioneer" is pointless. I could come up with thousands of perverted methods and become a "pioneer" as well. This does not mean anything but this: Kinsey dared to do something that NO ONE in his right state of mind would do. He was sick enough to molestate children "in the name of science." The ends justify the means, huh? And what are the ends? To prove that molestating children is acceptable. It is a vicious circle to support a perversion.

  • This is not only inaccurate, but offensive. Kinsey was not a pervert, he pioneered a field which studies perhaps one of the most important aspect of being a human, sex. Whether it is questions of gender, sexuality, or reproduction. These people have no idea what they are talking about and how important his work is, without it academia would not be the same. Whatever, believe what you want.

  • this documentary is what's biased...

  • i think this documentry is kinda biased, but sexual stimulation of children in the name of research won't help prove anything. just because men and women can reach orgasim at young ages doesnt meant adults should be encouraging it and that its good for the childs psyche.

  • Kinsey was a sexual deviant, so, in order to feel better about himself, he spent his life promoting his ridiculous notion that sexual deviation was actually the norm. A small amount of enlightenment may have come from his work, but, for the most part, he was just a very troubled man who misled a lot of gullible people and probably got alot of people hurt--like all of the children who were victimized by the pedophiles who were emboldened by Kinsey's hedonistic theories.

  • Kinsey was a tool. Please don't become brainwashed.

    Do a search for Kinsey & Illuminati, and see for yourself.

  • "He was a perverted man."

    Seems to be an objective documentary. ((sarcasm))

  • Excuse me, I don't know the guy personally to state something about this, but the whole thing is biased, so that doesn't help us anyway. If there is evidence then it should be presented in a more serious way than in an extremely "correct and moral" documentary.

  • Biased report from a bunch of sexually repressed folks who have NEVER had an orgasm....

  • Kinsey was a pedophile and a sexual deviant. He used his research to allow the rape of children and as an excuse to see men have sex with each other. There was very little value in his research except to perpetuate the abuse of children and other deviant behaviors.

    The bottom line is Kinsey was a child molester and promoted sexual deviants.

  • I don't think you need an excuse to see men have sex with each other. All you need is a credit card. As far as molestation is concerned, homosexual sex has as much to do with that as heterosexual sex.

  • there was no pay-per-view sex during Kinsey's time so he suckered men into having sex with each other and recorded them.

  • You're forgetting the great book this research lead to.

  • kinsey's book was biased and is not credible at all.

  • c0m9xa just because you say "kinsey's book was biased and is not credible at all. " does not mean its true.

    who are you? you could be some kid with parents that don't even want to talk about sex.

  • It is clearly biased and was never vetted before being released. Kinsey was clearly a pervert.

  • ... support your claims. don't write your opinion c0m9xa

  • i'm not doing the work for you. the information is out there. keep YOUR opinions to yourself. i'm not interested in them.

  • what opinions did i even make??? all i'm saying is to support your claims instead of running your mouth. if you can't do that then don't even bother venting your own agenda in here.

  • c0m9xa the fact that you said "i'm not doing the work for you" when i asked you to support your claims shows you know nothing about this topic.

  • you know absolutelty nothing about the topic. Therefore, do the research yourself. I'm not doing your work for you. When you actually do your own research, unless you're a pervert with perverted views like Kinsey, you'll see Kinsey's book is not credible. now go away!

  • Ummm...are there any medical, biological, psychological research scientists in the room? 'Cause I could have sworn that most studies of human anatomy and behavior *do* pay their participants. So, why are they adding that thing about the girl's father and grand-father getting paid as another one of their countless one-sided attacks on Kinsey?

  • -__-

    If you're a forensic psychologist studying serial killers, do you pay them to slaughter their victims, as long as they give you some records of it?

    Well, that would make you an accessory to murder, wouldn't it...?

  • You see, though, a forensic psychologist studying serial killers wouldn't need to take surveys of the general population. Their case-studies are generally pre-established serial killers. When a psychologist or a sociologists studies *general* human behavior, there is some form of payment. Without payment, the Scientist doing the research wouldn't get much of a response from potential participants.

  • It's a very similar research scenario. There is no reason why pedophilia can't also be studied by the case-studies of pre-established pedophiles and their documented victims. And then you might have an impartial study.

    What Kinsey did was very different.

    He paid child abusers to hand him their subjective, biased, non-controlled, accounts of continuing abuses, as sole source of info. And then he took conclusions from those biased accounts. That's pseudo-science. And a reward to child-rape.

  • Yeah, 95% of the population probably COULD have been considered sex offenders back in the day because so many sexual acts we would consider normal today were illegal.

  • Kinsey was the Christopher Columbus of sex, with everything good and everything bad that implies. He scored big points in the name of tolerance, but by any objective standard, he was a lousy, biased scientist and probably was, indeed, a pedophile.

  • Dude this whole thing is pretty biased. Kinsey got the data on the little boys from child molesters. The tables aren't super-specific, which would otherwise suggest involvement.

    His only real mistake was letting the molesters get away.

    *** THE REAL POINT ****

    ...Is that there is tons of variability in the sexual practices within the US then as well as today and that it's a matter of private, personal preference. Not all of it is legal, but that which IS can't be deemed, "WRONG" by whack-jobs.

  • biased documentary

  • I love how they HAD to mention that the director of the movie is homosexual. How is that relevant to their arguement?

    I understand the whole point to this but somethings they say seem rather politically inncorrect for being the more conservative crowd, do they not?

  • Kinsey the Father of the Sexual Revolution??

    I would say Feminism: the Mother of the Sexual Revolution.

    It's feminism that made the wohle thing happen anyway.

  • I thought the far-right condemned revisionism.

  • What part of this is revisionism? Have you read the Kinsey reports?

  • "I thought the far-right condemned revisionism."

    Where did you read that?

  • They lost me the moment they started talking about homosexuality as a "perversion"

  • Thank you for making this video. Alfred Kinsey is responsible for a lot of misery.

  • So is the feminist movement.

  • No you can't hide from reallity. The fact is that Kinsey's reaserch is valid. Read the comment and look at witch ones get thums up or thumbs down.

  • Kinsey made almost no interviews with children.

    None of his interview subjects mention anything about being abused as children.

    That's because Kinsey THREW IT OUT!

    He obviously squashed any info on child abuse.

    I think he was afraid that if he admitted that child molestation was wrong, then the other topics he wrote about would come under fire.

    A lot of Kinsey's work was also plagiarized. Much of it sounds like the stuff German Psychologists wrote about in the days before Hitler.

  • Absolutely, that was very sketchy. If he had showed that these child molesters were abused, it would be a connection between the otherwise destroyed childhood of the abusers and the sudden interest in putting children in un-child-like positions and situations. Through that it would basically be that child molestation is the child-abuser´s perverted past incarnate, and Kinsey himself was too chicken to ever make any such accusations.

  • many psycholoigists say that children are sexual from birth

  • eg Freud

  • Oh what horse shit.

  • One more thing before I move on to part two. Kinsey never studied children. He asked adults about their childhood. Kinsey successors have tried to explain this to you on many occasions. Or are you afraid to take your fingers out of your ears?

  • That old lady's a terrible actor.

  • I'm just gonna keep posting any time something in this video pisses me off. Why do say sex with a consenting man as if it's just as immoral as having sex with children and animals. Does Mrs. Reisman have sex with men? Ugh, see what you've made me do? Now I'm picturing Reisman naked. I think I'm gonna be sick.

  • And one more thing, stop saying "homosexual" like there's something wrong with it.