I'll give Monty credit for North Africa, but he should have been court-martialed over Market-Garden. And he might have been, if not for the fact that most of those who would have had to sit in judgement over him had made the same stubborn mistakes he did. There was just no way XXX Corps or anyone else could have gotten to Arnhem in the time alotted, not on that road. And some of his subordinates told him so at the outset. But Monty always did have a way of rewriting his history.
@tjhoenecke And who on the American side was responsible for Heligen Wood Americas main disaster in europe. Montgomery was an egotistical prick, Alexander was better and Slim was the best of the lot.U.S. Patton another egotist, anyone know what Clarke was like?Any others. We Aussies had a couple of good ones but they were nobbled by Blamey the bastard. However I think Monty was nobbled himself by Churchill who was always pushing, not a generals bumhole Churchill.
Was General Monty Lucky? Of course he was, he knew it and used that fact to the allies advantage. Napoleon was once asked to promote an officer to higher rank and after being told how good the officer was he asked;" Yes he sounds good, but is he lucky?, because luck and an officers ability to recognize it was as important as his bravery and ability combined"
try watching how Hitler lost the war and how he messed the the armies plans to invade Russia and Briton and if he left the original plans alone the this would have been a totally different war its kind of scary how close they came to winning
If someone like Field Marshall von Manstein commanded the Whermacht, I can't imagine what would have happened. Fortunately the Allies secret weapon, Hitler, was in place. Thanks for your comments CJMS08
What would you await from an Austrian Private? With all the high Generals lacking the balls to tell Hitler where to go, the only possible ending was total defeat for Germany. Hitler basically had NO idea what strategy or tactic are, and he also overestimated the power of certain "secret weapons".
@xxxx30pack Perhaps, but did Monty necessarily KNOW that at the time? Also, just because your opponent no longer has the strength to stay on the battlefield doesn't necessarily mean he's weak enough for you to annihilate him. How many guns, tank destroyers, assault guns, and infantry did Rommel still have left, besides those ten tanks? How much fuel and supplies did Monty have left, and how much energy did his men, after almost two straight weeks of fighting? Easier said than done....
hmm this volume was not as good as the others the massive recap and also the constatn repition of both infromation adn footage took away from wat could have been better, that saiud it was still a great watch.
well done,and regardless of what the Americans may think, this was the end of the Germans in Africa as an attacking army, defensive still dangerous .
18tangles 1 month ago
BRAVO!!!
musa77751 3 months ago
I'll give Monty credit for North Africa, but he should have been court-martialed over Market-Garden. And he might have been, if not for the fact that most of those who would have had to sit in judgement over him had made the same stubborn mistakes he did. There was just no way XXX Corps or anyone else could have gotten to Arnhem in the time alotted, not on that road. And some of his subordinates told him so at the outset. But Monty always did have a way of rewriting his history.
tjhoenecke 5 months ago
@tjhoenecke And who on the American side was responsible for Heligen Wood Americas main disaster in europe. Montgomery was an egotistical prick, Alexander was better and Slim was the best of the lot.U.S. Patton another egotist, anyone know what Clarke was like?Any others. We Aussies had a couple of good ones but they were nobbled by Blamey the bastard. However I think Monty was nobbled himself by Churchill who was always pushing, not a generals bumhole Churchill.
18tangles 1 month ago
Was General Monty Lucky? Of course he was, he knew it and used that fact to the allies advantage. Napoleon was once asked to promote an officer to higher rank and after being told how good the officer was he asked;" Yes he sounds good, but is he lucky?, because luck and an officers ability to recognize it was as important as his bravery and ability combined"
Bullettube 6 months ago
my dad was in the 8th army rasc 1st division (rhinos) he said the night the guns went off was like all hell broke loose
ukenutcase 1 year ago
my dad was in the 8th army rasc 1st division (rhinos) he said the night the guns went of was like all hell broke loose
ukenutcase 1 year ago
Good upload, thanks.
MrPpavlouk 2 years ago 4
try watching how Hitler lost the war and how he messed the the armies plans to invade Russia and Briton and if he left the original plans alone the this would have been a totally different war its kind of scary how close they came to winning
cjms08 2 years ago
If someone like Field Marshall von Manstein commanded the Whermacht, I can't imagine what would have happened. Fortunately the Allies secret weapon, Hitler, was in place. Thanks for your comments CJMS08
HoustonGD 2 years ago
What would you await from an Austrian Private? With all the high Generals lacking the balls to tell Hitler where to go, the only possible ending was total defeat for Germany. Hitler basically had NO idea what strategy or tactic are, and he also overestimated the power of certain "secret weapons".
TheRawke 2 years ago
this could have been done in 10 min.
januarysdawn 2 years ago
Rommel had 10 tanks left, Monty should've captured or killed him....
Cheers, great upload.....
xxxx30pack 2 years ago
@xxxx30pack Perhaps, but did Monty necessarily KNOW that at the time? Also, just because your opponent no longer has the strength to stay on the battlefield doesn't necessarily mean he's weak enough for you to annihilate him. How many guns, tank destroyers, assault guns, and infantry did Rommel still have left, besides those ten tanks? How much fuel and supplies did Monty have left, and how much energy did his men, after almost two straight weeks of fighting? Easier said than done....
tjhoenecke 5 months ago
hmm this volume was not as good as the others the massive recap and also the constatn repition of both infromation adn footage took away from wat could have been better, that saiud it was still a great watch.
metho20 2 years ago
Battlefield II seems to be a rough draft for a better production lol. Battlefield I is far superior
HoustonGD 2 years ago
Enjoyed every bit of it, though. Thanks GD.
101Dobermanns 2 years ago
Yet another great volume! Thanks GD.
NGP58 2 years ago 6