@taurnguard In the trailer for this movie (Conviction) she doesn't seem like that at all. Also, she was wonderful in What's Eating Gilbert Grape, and The Other Sister.
@taurnguard maybe you'd like Harrison Ford if he didn't only play leading men/hero types? Actor's are confined to their success and often type cast--which in Juliette's case her most successful films have been some of the one's you mentioned. Search Juliette's other Films. You'll find the "etc" you mentioned are actually night and day with her other roles. Search "The Way Of The Gun", "Hysterical Blindness" or "Chasing Freedom", "My Louisiana Sky" etc.
@verstwo2 Well as a rule I'm not a fan of most religions but even with supposed proof of their wrong doing, it doesn't make them any different then anyone else. Regardless of her beliefs, I do not hold her responsible for any actions that those who share her beliefs have committed. As a result, my original statement about who she is as a person stands.
@Deadmansparty2002 - I agree with everything you said. However, she can and should be held responsible for her own beliefs. Not that there is anything 'wrong' with her. Just that I don't think Scientology is compatible with 'down to earth'....which is why I stipulated that exception.
@verstwo2 Her beliefs are not preventing her from being, for all intents in purposes from what can be seen of her, a regular person. What she believes has not prevented her from living within the rules society has set out, and as a result, she's no danger to herself or to others. I don't see any problem with her beliefs in that context.
@Deadmansparty2002 - My entire point is that Scientology is somewhat incompatible with being 'down to earth'. Not that she's a 'bad' person or a dangerous one or that I have a problem with her beliefs in this context.
@verstwo2 One could say that about any religion, and some people do. But that doesn't make it true. The prevailing media attention about Scientology would lead people to believe that but having personally sat down and discussed the religion with people who subscribe to those beliefs, I'm inclined to disagree with your point. I've heard about the "things they've done", and what they believe, but that doesn't make Scientology and being "down to earth" incompatible.
@Deadmansparty2002 - The entire concept of most religions revolves around a 'spiritual' detachment from the earth. Whether it's heaven or a spaceship, when part of a person beliefs and hopes for a life that's not on the earth....then that aspect of their belief is incompatible with the notion of being 'down to earth'. It doesn't mean that they cannot have other aspects to their personality that could be considered 'down to earth'.
@verstwo2 But being 'down to earth' is an overall concept of a person's personality and you can't segment out any particular aspects. Being religious is based on a belief in the way that people act on earth and it's the basis on which most of the laws and structures of society have their origins. So the reality is that religion is part of everyone's lives whether they believe in it or not, or whether they are 'down to earth' or not.
@Deadmansparty2002 - While I don't total disagree with what you're saying, I think much of it is debatable. Much of secular society only owes it origin to religion in the fact that it is a reaction to it. And people most certainly can and do segment their religious beliefs from the rest of their personality. Really though, if being 'down to earth' is an overall concept of a person's personality can you really make that judgment based on how they portray themselves in the media?
brilliant actress and has wicked personal vibes re the world. perfect.
OzTerri 2 days ago
I love her, she's a real person, not some Hollywood cookie cutter piece of shit.
Vulpinegirl 1 month ago
What an amazing actor she has been since so young. She has a delightful personality & is so cute!
sandycurrie108 1 month ago
Juliette you are beautifull inside and out, love ya girl.
theDoggydodo 2 months ago
she is so funny and comes off very sweet and smart. great interview!
rwrocksteady 2 months ago
I actually gained a lot of respect for her after watching this interview, she's actually pretty awesome.
christopherawesome 2 months ago
She looks amazing! xx
Crystalgirlist 3 months ago
New Idol. Everything she said about acting is exactly how I feel about it all
banana61991 5 months ago
she's cool as a cucumber...no really I love her
creedstat 6 months ago
let her be the bad girl all she wants ... u crazy
Senator123123 9 months ago 2
shame she's a scientologist, otherwise I love her!
MsEmhol 10 months ago 2
She's amazing!
reneeasl 11 months ago
She's very very purty
MrFuhrer2009 11 months ago
I loved in Natural Born Killers...." How sexy am I now, FUCKER ? "
KurtsAddiction 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
KurtsAddiction 1 year ago
Ask her about her Scientology!
verstwo2 1 year ago
xenu.tv
godfree2canada 1 year ago 2
I love her
83056 1 year ago
I would have more respect for her as an actress if she didn't play the same role over and over again: the ditzy girlfriend of the bad guy.
Natural Born Killers.. Kalifornia.. Cape Fear.. Starsky & Hutch.. all the same role.
taurnguard 1 year ago
@taurnguard maybe she was type cast?
M0Faux 1 year ago
@taurnguard In the trailer for this movie (Conviction) she doesn't seem like that at all. Also, she was wonderful in What's Eating Gilbert Grape, and The Other Sister.
thebellrang 1 year ago
Comment removed
LFL84 1 year ago
Comment removed
LFL84 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@taurnguard maybe you'd like Harrison Ford if he didn't only play leading men/hero types? Actor's are confined to their success and often type cast--which in Juliette's case her most successful films have been some of the one's you mentioned. Search Juliette's other Films. You'll find the "etc" you mentioned are actually night and day with her other roles. Search "The Way Of The Gun", "Hysterical Blindness" or "Chasing Freedom", "My Louisiana Sky" etc.
LFL84 1 year ago
A great interview, she seems like a really down to earth person.
Deadmansparty2002 1 year ago
@Deadmansparty2002 really? Co$
godfree2canada 1 year ago
@godfree2canada yes, really.
Deadmansparty2002 1 year ago
@Deadmansparty2002 - Yeah except for that Scientology thing.
verstwo2 1 year ago
@verstwo2 Well as a rule I'm not a fan of most religions but even with supposed proof of their wrong doing, it doesn't make them any different then anyone else. Regardless of her beliefs, I do not hold her responsible for any actions that those who share her beliefs have committed. As a result, my original statement about who she is as a person stands.
Deadmansparty2002 1 year ago
@Deadmansparty2002 - I agree with everything you said. However, she can and should be held responsible for her own beliefs. Not that there is anything 'wrong' with her. Just that I don't think Scientology is compatible with 'down to earth'....which is why I stipulated that exception.
verstwo2 1 year ago
@verstwo2 Her beliefs are not preventing her from being, for all intents in purposes from what can be seen of her, a regular person. What she believes has not prevented her from living within the rules society has set out, and as a result, she's no danger to herself or to others. I don't see any problem with her beliefs in that context.
Deadmansparty2002 1 year ago
@Deadmansparty2002 - My entire point is that Scientology is somewhat incompatible with being 'down to earth'. Not that she's a 'bad' person or a dangerous one or that I have a problem with her beliefs in this context.
verstwo2 1 year ago 2
@verstwo2 One could say that about any religion, and some people do. But that doesn't make it true. The prevailing media attention about Scientology would lead people to believe that but having personally sat down and discussed the religion with people who subscribe to those beliefs, I'm inclined to disagree with your point. I've heard about the "things they've done", and what they believe, but that doesn't make Scientology and being "down to earth" incompatible.
Deadmansparty2002 1 year ago
@Deadmansparty2002 - The entire concept of most religions revolves around a 'spiritual' detachment from the earth. Whether it's heaven or a spaceship, when part of a person beliefs and hopes for a life that's not on the earth....then that aspect of their belief is incompatible with the notion of being 'down to earth'. It doesn't mean that they cannot have other aspects to their personality that could be considered 'down to earth'.
verstwo2 1 year ago
@verstwo2 But being 'down to earth' is an overall concept of a person's personality and you can't segment out any particular aspects. Being religious is based on a belief in the way that people act on earth and it's the basis on which most of the laws and structures of society have their origins. So the reality is that religion is part of everyone's lives whether they believe in it or not, or whether they are 'down to earth' or not.
Deadmansparty2002 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Deadmansparty2002 - While I don't total disagree with what you're saying, I think much of it is debatable. Much of secular society only owes it origin to religion in the fact that it is a reaction to it. And people most certainly can and do segment their religious beliefs from the rest of their personality. Really though, if being 'down to earth' is an overall concept of a person's personality can you really make that judgment based on how they portray themselves in the media?
verstwo2 1 year ago