Added: 2 years ago
From: blackman767
Views: 259,337
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,170)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Loving the sound track :P

  • anyone who plays RTW and is worth there salt would know having 300 spartan hoplites is impossible

  • This is on esey u can see becose they dont use there archers

  • cheat...321 spartans

  • Real hard defeating camels and Eastern infantry with fully upgraded spartans O.o Numidia are just about the most shit faction in Rome, and Spartan hoplites are the best regiment in the game...

  • it states 300 but if you can count theres 321

  • Comment removed

  • men i want that F*cking game

  • What is this music ?

  • what kind of retard throws away his cav into some spears?

  • these gays aren't even persians, they are numnibians (f*ck spelling) the persians of rtw are the seleucics

  • @hoi1ik

    jahaaa maar de persians in rtw zijn rose en deze kleur vond ik mooier

  • @hoi1ik de seleucid's hoorde eerst bij het grote rijk van alexander de grote. toen alexander dood ging werd zijn rijk opgedeeld in een aantal stukken. het gebied van de seleucid's is een van zo'n stuk. dus de seleucid's is een macedonishe dinanstie en zijn geen perzen. ze hebben wel (deels) het gebied van de perzen maar nee, het zijn geen perzen

  • @hoi1ik Selucide empire of Rome total war are Greek as they were in history. They took over when Alexander died as the eastern part of his empire and fought for succession. They were later taken down by Persia. Closest thing to Persia in Rome total war would be Parthia.

  • OMFG thats so easy when you form that with phalanx ...

  • persian war elephants can mow them down after spending their missiles

  • lol in the end and during battle its red,white,and blue :)

  • what game is this called?

  • @4megodspeed Rome: Total war

  • the persians dident have calv

  • @joeyandjeffery HAHAHA good joke. the persians had about 10,000 cav at the battle of maraton (10 years before the battle of thermoplaye) the persians always had relatively a big cavalery regiment.

  • @brammatie2 when the greeks fought them at thermoopali they dident have any cav i read it on this one site in school

  • force their lines to break

  • thats when you use some artillery

  • The Spartans only lost because they were flanked, Leonidas died on like the 2nd day and the remaining troops ran to the phocian wall to defend it and died there, there was only like maybe 700 remaining at the wall and there WAS 300 Spartans, but they had like 1400 Thespians and Acadians to help them or something like that, but the backbone of the fight was the Spartans for sure I say. One last thing for the people hating because it's not the Persians... It's ROME TOTAL WAR not GREEK.

  • I did the same and had the same result. Well done!

    P.S. U were fighting against Numidian, not Persian

    P.P.S. Try to win 300 Numidians vs 4000 Spartans. That would be perfect xD

  • Epic at 2:00, perfect square formation. :P I used tactics like this specilly against barbarian infantry units, but always using the limit red battle line to cover my troops from attacks from behind

  • "the cloud has fallen...on a shore......the mighty hand and sword...of roman war...." nice lyrics... funny though since its a greek army.

  • @Ereshkigal616

    That's the Rome Total War song.

  • WAIT!! was this in sparta?

  • this is not persia

  • Good video:)

    I use theese strategy too and i love it :D

    good music :) where do you get it from??

  • song??

  • Love how everyone thinks they know about Thermopali because they saw 300.

  • @cusheth yeah but I personally find it funnier that you can’t spell Thermopylae LMAO

  • @plataokamoca how long it take ya to find that out?

  • @cusheth Thermopylae*

    

  • @cusheth There are various aspects for the 300. I am greek and i know what Thermopali meant for us. If Leonidus hadnt killed the Persians there greeks wouldnt exist and i believe on what i am saying.

  • Spartans had some casualties.......BOOO

  • well, they didnt have any archers!!! + u should formed a line at the end of map - to cover flanks! if i fought u i d beat you easily!! even with that loser army! they were not persian they were Numidians i think.?!?!?

  • Noob square, big money, greek city states.

    I declare this video is shit

  • Name of the song ?

  • SPARTANS!!!!!!!!! PREPARE FOR GLORY!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Good man

  • Soundtrack: Jeff van Dyck (Rome: Total War) Credits: Forever

  • Soldier Sir the spartans are beating us General hey thats my job!

  • THIS IS SPARTA!!!

  • What is this version of the song and where can I get it???

  • where are the archers

  • song is very good but video suck ! Spartan GLORY !!

  • what is name of this song?

  • @pinkysuspegasus Rome Total War's song, might be theme song? Not sure But it does belong to Rome Total War

  • @RsSeanolaf101 forever rome total war

  • zoo where is LEONIDAS

  • lol i just downloaded rome gor 5 mins? lol when i played this i used this but not soldiers but archers

  • its actully 321 get your math right LOL

  • Its funny tha tin every one of these battles online the spartans win they actuly lost the battle of thermopali

  • @TheRomanLegionary yes but that battle was vs 1000000 persians and now they fight vs 4000

  • @blackman767 Actually, there were about 30 000 soldiers on the Spartan side and 2 000 000 - 2 700 000 on the Persian one.

  • @themostbeatifull how? if the spartans had that many troops they would have won the battle with the strong phalanx of the greeks historically the spartans had about 7500 and the persians had about 100,000 or 300,000 dont believe fake stuff like the movie 300 

  • @Suchite100 The facts I'm posting are actually historically right. Yes, the Spartans didn't have 30 000 soldiers, but I said there were 30 000 soldiers fighting on the Spartan side, including Arcadians, Teagens, Spartans and others. On the Persian side I did make a typo, they were about 700 000 if you include the non fighting elements and peasants... PS: I am far from thinking that 300 was historically acurate... Anyways, have a good day.

  • @themostbeatifull 7500 on the spartan side which is the historically right which historian did u hear this from bill cosby?

  • @Suchite100 No, from the book "The History of Herodotus: Polymnia", written by the ancient Greek historian Herodotus. Where did you get your facts?

  • @themostbeatifull herodotus was a exaggerator making every thing seem heroic

  • @themostbeatifull and as translated The small Greek force (appox. 6000) led by Leonidas I, sent to Thermopylae to delay the Persian army (~5,283,220 (Herodotus)

  • @themostbeatifull u give up?

  • @Suchite100 Well, I'm sorry it took me so long to answer you, but I did make some more research about the matter and found, in an old book that I own called "The defence of Greece", written by J.F Lazenby, the near same information as Herodotus. But, I also searched more on Herodotus and it is true, he was known for exaggeration. Still, it happened thousands of years ago and the real information was diformed by hundreds, we may never know the truth.

  • @blackman767 The Spartans didn't fight 1,000,000 men. The actual number was between 70,000 - 300,000.

  • @blackman767 Actually historians actually estimate the real number of persians was realistically between 100,000 to 300,000 it's even been suggested their numbers were even under 100,000 going as low as around 60,000.

  • @blackman767 .... 7000 Greeks v.s. 250, 000 Persians.

  • @MJFAN666 100,000 is also a possibility. modern estimates are closer to 100,000 than 250,000

  • @brammatie2 The largest force that fought Alexander was about 150, 000 in the 3rd cent. B.C. so 100, 000 for greek invasion in 480 B.C. is probably right.

  • @TheRomanLegionary and they were killed by archers they would win if persians did not found way to theit back O:)

  • @TheRomanLegionary The spartans lost that battle? So you're saying that the Persians lost 20,000 Men and the Spartans lost 2,000 - 4,000 men? That's defiantly a loss.

  • @KittenzKill There were actuly only 300 spartans with greek about 7000 greek alies and although the persians losses were cripling the spartans still lost

  • @KittenzKill the term is Pyrrhic* victory for the persians

  • @watcher792 Im aware of the term.

  • @TheRomanLegionary they killed 20000 there though this is just 4000

  • i showed this to my cousin then he said at the end **** PERSIANS!

  • LIKE A BOSS BATTLE! BOOM! ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED FOR SPARTANS! LIKE A BOSS!

  • they fuckin ate those camels

  • Numidia is not the same as persia, instead you should use parthia or pontus

  • nice edit with the music

  • lets go noob square!

  • Reminds me of the battle of Marathon :-)

  • it's not fare , you need to fight.

    but still awesome :)

  • why don´t you give them some real armour? this is just impossible to win for persians

  • 90 Persians didn like it

  • sorry can't rate 5 stars :P only a thump :D

  • lets think rome total war as rock paper scissors ok?

    footmen are scissors

    archers are rock

    cavalry are paper

    spartans are chainsaw

  • @Peterj55555 Cavalry in the backside or Head hurlers = dead Spartans.

  • @MJFAN666 Yeah man. Phalanx break pretty easy if flanked.

  • @blackman767 play the historic battle, where you side the greeks and fight against spartans lol

  • the enemies are not very smart, though

  • next time put your 300 spartans vs. 4000 persians horse archers lets see how you beat that!!!

  • no archers? this kid has no skill

  • come on!

    all those camelmen against spearmen?noob

  • you know you could of made the box  like... a box....

  • Comment removed

  • parthia is persia in the game not numidia

  • leonidas didnt know abouth the noob circle

  • go spartans win

    

  • if i fighet whit that army aiganst you i have won i have crushed your greek army

  • @maassuporters You can't even spell fought right....Why are you so dumb?

  • Against cavalry? You might even put 40.000 of them there. Pointless video.

  • by the time i scarred them into regrouping at their town center had lost both my cav units and looking at my chances of winning i figured i would put the rest of my men in formation to increase enemy losses.... they began attacking me fullheartedly, and slowely i beat them back from the gates. after about 25 minutes i had them beat back to the town center where the remaining 40 men (in total) i had left finished off the last of them. the score screen said i killed 867 guals with no survivors :)

  • today i was playing campaign and a small detatchment of my army was seiging a town owned by gaul. they attacked me before reinforcements could get there so it was 4 depleted units of praetorian coharts and two lioganary cav. (about 200 men) versus their army of 800. the only advantage i had was that i could charge their gates before they got out of the town. but after i slaughtered the first 3 units they stopped coming out..... i busted my way in and scarred them back to the town center (PART 1)

  • Finally a music that suits ina a Rome Total War video.

  • song??

  • Thumbs up if you have snowflakes on =)

  • those arent persians... the closest thing to persians on rome was parthia... persia came from the east, also, not the southwest like numidia would have done... get it at least halfway right next time...

  • omg all spartans have full upgrade you noob!

  • If there was Archer, it would of been different!

  • it was actualluy 250,000 persians........ can barbarian invasion or rome total war work in windows 7? and do you have to install rome total war in order for Barbarian invasion to work? thanks please answer!

  • @nicoeste8765

    yes it is fo windows 7

    and yes first instal rome total war than you can instal Barbarian invasion

  • greeks have updates full and persiens havn't any update

  • Draak1997@ nah, spartans just rule. Peasants still fail with 3000 full upgraded vs 321 greeks without.

    And they won easy becouse enemy couldnt counter em.

    Only easy way to beat this to use elephants to break the wall and make a mess, or archers

  • No Archers no great video

  • 320 spartans (80+80+80+80=320) :D

    

  • but neither are Roman, Spartans are Greek, and Persians are Persians

  • he wins because his spartans are max upgradet (golden) then even peaseant are powning

  • Thumbs up if you play rome total war not empire/napoleon/shogun total war

  • @SquidzCurse I play all of them

  • @MtthwSmmns So do I, but some are better than others depending on your personal opinion. I liked Medieval 2 the best.

  • @MtthwSmmns Wow.That means your PC is so good that it can handle 5 modern warfares

  • @SquidzCurse thats right!

  • @MtthwSmmns what kind of the game like that can someone tell me or send me a link?

  • I play all of them because i'm not a modern video game hater like you

  • @SquidzCurse im getting rome total war for xmas, if anyone would be willing to show me the ropes, it would be much appritiated

  • @SquidzCurse i play all of them im so skilled :)

  • @SquidzCurse Medieval 2 total war?

  • @SquidzCurse I can't have Rome Total war on my conputer so i play shogun and shogun total war are great but if you don't think that so don't say it.

    It's only CAN*T play it :'(

  • you dont put distance troops in the persian army,

    if you had put some archers in the persian army you probably had lost that battle

  • Is there already TOtal War: Third Reich???? xD... or any of the 2 world wars

  • @EmperorElixir777 Good God no!

  • What's the song

  • I do this all the time, despite how old the game is :P

  • noob box

  • it looks like a bunch of ants eating a cherry flavored jolly rancher.

  • what is the name of the game

    

  • @madachez Rome: total war. there's lot's of others in the total war series as well; Medieval 2, Shogun 2 etc. Great games most of them.

  • @robby99764 napoleon

  • @SquidzCurse Yeah, I said "etc." I didn't think napoleon was that good game personally.

  • @robby99764 OK

  • Noob box like a boss xD

  • @l0lwutbro It is actually a fairly common military tactic implemented until recent times... even occurred at the times of WW I and probably was used in some spots that were not in the Trench Warfare Lockdown.

  • name of the song? ;)

  • Actually it's 321 Spartans vs 4023 Numidians

  • how did the persians have 4000 troops though in my RTW has only maximum of 41 Legion each box... (do anyone get me?)... newbie inquirie...

  • @EmperorElixir777 go to options and set units to maximum :D u will have 480 solders per 1 unit but be ready for max lag :D

  • @Simsiuksas hehehe, thanks for the reply,,,, how to minimize the lag??? is it possible??

  • erm... thats the eye of ra... meaning those are egyptians... not persians -.-

  • @aznsorawarrior Egypt was part of the Persian empire

  • @FTWLetsGame it was for a short while in 500 AD. but the persians would never have used a egyptian signal as their own as they did not believe in theocracy as the egyptians did. they would have used the sign of zoroastrianism. in between this time, the egyptians would have only used the sign.

  • @aznsorawarrior Well, then, in my argument, I'm going to say... It's a game. Oh well :P

  • @FTWLetsGame lol.... the overwhelming argument winner

  • @FTWLetsGame -.- damn i hate that argument

  • you had 320 spartans cheater! lol jk nice vid

  • Therse are not persians lol

  • I agree that the archers would have made it a better video, but hey come on! Thanks for posting this! I have subscribed to you, please can you do the same likewise?

  • where the heck are the persian archers? this war isn't good after all without them.

  • lol where are the archers? they would kill them

  • yea, try 4000 archers.... goodbye spartans

  • lol, the Spartan's spears look to be highly toxic, as soon as Persians touch the spears they die!

    Eat my SHIT ;-)

  • What song is this?

    sounds like someone made a song out of some soundtrack from this game

  • actually thats 320 spartans :(

  • what about a million persians?

  • epic song

  • numidians was not persians !

  • 321 Spartans!