Abraham Lincoln once defined a HYPOCRITE: 'a man who murdered both his parents, then pleaded for mercy on the grounds that he was an orphan'.
'Plant a tree to offset my emissions'. My God, are all these environmentalists taking drugs! There's something seriously wrong with them P.S. in more ways than one if you catch my drfit!
BRILLIANT!!! I LOVE IT... omg the dude that says "we planted trees" did you? Did YOU plant those trees or you paid a little bit of money to a carbon offset company that maybe said something they do somewhere is plant trees?
Im looking over these comments and i am reminded about the United Nations conference in Montreal on climate change and i think that people should be muchmore informed about what these varying scientists have to say, after all they werent flying to Florida for a stroll along the beach...
Most of them didnt even know why it was hypocritical. The one guy said "we planted trees to offset it" AHahahaha.... Global warming is the biggest joke of the 21rst century, easy.
"I think we are done thank you" yes you are done.
"I think you are being invasive" Oh but you were being extremely invasive when you forced your religion on the children of this world and then tried to take it over and shut down western civilization. Thank God you are done.
The activists did themselves no favour by not actualy tackling this guy on the real issues. Istead they told him to simply go away. Or maybe some of them did but that was just edited out.
Eh obviously they flew in. How else to expect them to lobby the governments to actualy make a change. The americans for example, really need to be whipped into shape, seriously!
The globalists are not only laughing at anybody who dissagrees with them and their AGW scam but they are also laughing at the 'hearts and minds' of all the people who have latched themselves to the un-proven theory of AGW.... These so-called 'climate activists' have been duped by their peers.
This is like invading a religious cult. The leader Al Gore is protected from the outside reporters, and the cult followers have no answer for why they do or believe like they do.
Bunch of idiots. That's what you get when it comes to liberal hippy bullshit. Empty people. Say one thing, do the other. Al gore is their leader. A huge joke/scam.
Busted! The global warming bullshit has been busted. The idiots that support this scam show how stupid the whole thing is. Ahhhh Haaaaa!!!!! Idiots!!!!!!!
If you think Co2 warms the planet then ask yourself this.
Co2 reflects infra-red energy back to the surface of the planet then shouldn't it reflect infra red energy back from the sun thus counselling itself out?
I have asked this question on other sites but have not had an answer back.
Well I did get 1 which was that we do not get infra-red from the sun. Poor education I suppose.
You are a complete moron. Do you cover your ears and yell, "Yaa yaa, yaaa" so you don't hear the truth about global warming ?. Have you never heard of climategate ?.
Are you against wealthy people? You seem to. Keep in mind global warming stands to devastate the livelihoods of citizens of developing nations and lower-income Americans more than anything.
We have multi-millionaire, land-owning elitists trying to convince us that we peons need to suffer while they jet around the world going to conferences.
I'm not against wealthy people at all. I'm against wealthy people using govt to run my life and impoverish me.
Al Gore recently bought a house at sea level in Santa Barbara--guess he's not THAT worried, eh?
Are you against non-rich people? You must be if you support economy-killing legislation.
Over planet-destroying legislation? Yes. Though keep in mind its actually the wealthy who suffer the most under government regulation, they pay the most in taxes after all.
I've been biking as my main form of transportation for the past 2 years, and have made a conscious effort to stop using a/c. Although the actions of any one person is irrelevant on a global scale, your concern about carbon footprints are admirable.
But how do 90% of climate scientists become convinced of man-made global warming without "a single shred of evidence"? I'd love to hear this.
I'm not concerned about carbon footprints at all, since it has nothing to do w/global warming.
I said there isn't a shred of evidence that alleged man-caused warming (I thought it was "climate change" now, so that ALL types of weather could be covered?) will lead to the earth being "destroyed".
Its funny how now you Religious Greens--after having been proven frauds in the 1970s w/bogus "global cooling" and AGAIN in the 1990's-00's w/bogus "global warming"--have finally settled of "climate change/disruption" so that ANY kind of weather can be blamed on mankind!
Its amazing you religious zealots aren't laughed out of the room. Guess it helps to have the backing of govts, multi-nat'l corps, the media, schools brainwashing kids, etc. Even with ALL THIS people are skeptical.
The only people who put forward a "global cooling" theory in the 1970's was a small group of scientists who somehow got a lot of media attention at the time. Despite it, there was never anything resembling a scientific consensus. But, do you know if any of the scientists that supported the theory back then support global warming today? Or if they're still alive, for that matter?
If I could make one correction though, multi-national corporations are mostly opposed to efforts to counter global warming. That's why you see most global warming skepticism organizations being funded largely by oil companies.
Yes, and govts and its dependents (universities) and the tax-exempt arms of corporations fund the pro-warming scientists.
It is INCREDIBLE how much effort (time, money, propaganda campaigns, scaring naive school children, awarding Gore a Nobel, etc.) has been spent trying to convince Americans this is a threat.
ENRON supported Kyoto for Chist's sake!
Oil corporations ALSO fund the pro-warming side and give credence to the scare-campaign. They're gonna make money REGARDLESS
Right, so naturally you should view universities and government institutions as being more credible sources of scientific information than corporations. But that is neither here nor there.
Why does it surprise you in the least that people would spend time and effort into preventing what they believe to be impending ecological and infrastructural destruction at the hands of a rising global temperature? It seems like the rational course of action, to me.
I was the first to raise my hand to ask a question, "How can you defend your global warming hypothesis when you have omitted the effects of clouds which affect heat balance far more than carbon dioxide, and when your hypothesis contradicts the paper by Lee in the Journal of Applied Meteorology in 1972 that shows the atmosphere does not behave like a greenhouse?"
He answered me by saying, "You do not know what you are talking about. I know more about how the atmosphere works than you do."
Not being one to drop out of a fight, I responded, "I know many of the atmospheric scientists in this room, and many others who are not present but I do not know you. What is your background and what makes you know so much more than me?"
He answered, "I know more than you because I am a lawyer and I work for the EPA."
After the meeting, many of my atmospheric science friends who worked for public agencies thanked me for what I said, saying they would have liked to say the same thing but they feared for their jobs.
And that, my dear readers, is my recollection of that great day when a lawyer, acting as a scientist, working for the federal government, announced global warming.
Its fairly routine in the scientific community for individuals who make assertions or conflicting claims without evidence to be ignored, or not taken seriously. It'd be even more frightening if the scientific establishment would be ground to a halt by having to devote all of its time and resources to the appeasement of conspiracy theorists and outright lunatics. 9/11 truthers make the same complaints when engineers and other scientists won't take their papers seriously either.
It's the duty of any scientist to consider ALL data, so long as the data is viable, relevant, and obtained through a reliable methodology. It is not their job, however, to have to attempt to have a rational discourse with anyone who makes an assertion based on what is clearly flawed reasoning.
Except we're NOT talking about a small, fringe group of "nuts" that dispute the Green Religions' claims that the sky is falling, but 1000's and 1000's of legit scientists. The UN--a gagggle of loser politicians and special interest groups--has been the biggest propagator of lies and alarmism.
It has been the ESTABLISHMENT, not ordinary people, who've been trying SO desperately to convince everyone that "WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!" unless we give up more freedom.
Relatively speaking, yes, we are talking about a fringe. Thousands of scientist are willing to toss their credibility around and make ecological claims, even when their Ph.Ds lie in the field of political science, or theology, or engineering, or any number of unrelated fields. I can find hundreds of scientists that will tell you that 9/11 was an inside job. Of course, none of those scientist have a degree in engineering. There is a reason for that.
And its odd that you would exclude scientists from the category of "ordinary people". I'd like to think that we as a society don't dehumanize people simply for being educated. Unlike the special interest groups and corporate lobbyists, a scientist is not required to maximize profit, but to simply pursue the objective and falsifiable truth. That is what defines them. If we can't trust the people who's job requires them to adhere to objectivity, than who can we trust?
"We planted the trees to offset it though". What a load of bullshit. Sounds like his Bizzaroworld Messiah AlGore, exceept Al makes money off of the bullshit.
You can tell by the way he said it that it was untrue. Typical Leftliar. You would have to plant one huge buttload of trees to offset all the spew from COP. I wonder if your friends on the Left who committed arson planted trees to offset the fires they started? I wonder if they planted trees to offset all of the teargas that was required to deal with them?
You know those jokes that have the Irish Mick as the dumb ass in the punch line. Is this the guy? What is the point of making this stuff up! just try to use less energy and be more productive and respectful to the place that sustains life to your dumb ass. And whats wrong with that?
Se this is what happens when priests fiddle- didle there alter boys they grow up to be this dick.
Just put your river dance tape on have some boiled taties and chill the fuck out.
OK, so maybe it is really necessary to go to this conference, and there is no other option then to go by plane. But what about the frequent flyer miles they get from this trip, they won't use them for leisure flights right?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
seriously, Mr. Phelim McAleer is one of those pestering journalists. This is no way of flouting the right to speech and debate. There has to be an element of respect and dignity maintained. The UN guards, rightfully, ordered him harshly for being a bug to Schneider and Al Gore.
And if he were instead a typical liberal journalist badgering a climate change "denier" or a right wing politician would you feel the same way? No, you would then say he was doing his job.
What these enviroMENTALISTS need to understand is its not transportation but fuel that is harming the environment. we cant do without transport. they need to be fighting for real alternative fuels not against transport. If we can invent the nuclear bomb we can damn well invent a safe fuel. but the oil cartels are very powerful.
It is a shame to be hypocritical, although hypocrisy doesn't always mean much. The CO2 generated by the conference, while large, is an insignificant expenditure when compared to the amount of CO2 emissions that will, hopefully, be averted as a result.
Do the dangers of drug abuse become a farce when preached by a drug addict? Is a criminal not allowed to encourage lawfulness?
If they were so concerned about the environment, why wasn't this whole conference held via the internet? We surely have the technology to have held this via video conferencing! Hypocrites.
There's any number of good reasons to be disgusted with this farce, but this clown (McAleer) is a bore. How would he have had these people show up in Copenhagen anyway? Most of those there represent 100's to millions of people, so the cost of airfare and the carbon is a relative bargain. It's this kind of childish nonsense that makes the opposition seem credible.
I'm not sure but I think I'm using one of al gore's creations called the internet right now. I've never done it myself but I believe the great technology invented by mr. gore allows people across the world to meet via the magic of the internet. but it's not as fun to brag to your friends about your teleconference as it is to brag about your private jet and first class hotel stay. global government here we come! (just make sure you ride your bike)
Amend seanboy80, you have clarity of vision and couldn't have said it better myself.
If bowing bam signs this crap and and the meat in congress (that is bought, sold and traded by elitists) passes it, then time to become a career criminal and take from the system rather then put into it.
Can't blame them really. Gore and his business partners from Goldman Sachs and Enron aren't the only one's who will clean up in this scam. There's lots of money to be made in this scam, even lower level peddlers and snake oil shysters like these people.
Sorry to tell you Seanboy, but Enron went out of business in 2001, so it a little hard for them to "clean up" on the scam. Even the evil Ken Lay died in 2006. You may want to do a little more research in who is behind this fraud against the world. p.s. Bush lost the election so he is out of the loop too.
My father once said, "I would never tell you to do something I would not do myself." I applaud people who live the life they profess, even if I don't agree with it.
The people in these videos must realize that they are not important to the Copenhagen treaty process.
Why are they there? They tell us to stop wasting our resources yet here they are, joining in events which do not pertain to the actual treaty but the city wide rally which supports it. Wasting paper, fuel, electricity, etc.
unbelievable yet believable at the same time. what these people want to stop is "ordinary" people (the plebs) flying off to spain, greece etc on cheap flights once a year. they don't consider anything they do as hypocritical in the slightest. if ever there is a case of "do as i say not as i do", this is it! they should all be horse whipped, especially that klein woman, mind you , she'd probably enjoy it. the sarcastic bitch.
Frigging silly crap. We are not going to stop flying in planes are driving cars, and no one is suggesting that we should. But we can make the planes and cars we do use pollute less as generally live our lives in a more environmentally friendly fashion. Produce less trash, use less fuel, make less noise. This reporter is showing just how ignorant he and others like him are.
These "climate change" people, while holding some legitimacy to their concerns, are very dishonest. They are the same people, who in California, push solar panel farms, and then hire lawyers to block the transmission lines over the Mountains! There is a sewage crisis in the developing world...but whatever! right!
But you see, sewage treatment plants are too concrete, there is not enough social activism bullshit to make it cloudy enough to get a set amount of graft, I mean money, but "climate change" is right on the money!
A smart answer would have been, "We had about 10 members who wanted to come to copenhagen but in an effort to redusce carbon emissions we voted on only 2 representatives of our organization to make the trip. Although we realize all flights create carbon emissions we hope that by cutting down on the number of those attending we were able to make a difference" - easy.
Global warming is not a "hoax," but the notion that economies can do anything to stop it (within the allowances of these damn Luddites) is at the core of the problem. "Social Activism" is a great business. Waters will rise somewhat, and NOBODY is talking about levees, I mean, the Netherlands is based on it!
Gyrode, Ok, global warming is not a "hoax", how about a fraud ? The world has been given proof that the "science" behind global warming / global cooling / climate change / ( insert next years name here ) was faked to produce the "science", government grants, movies, books, and ... a Nobel prize.
@edisoncarter1985 I am more concerned about how they try to "fix" the problem. They are luddites, and are allergic to nuclear power for example, we have to stop burning coal no matter what, but these bastards are anti nuclear, and conservation-only is crap. "Social Activism" is a great business when you get government money!
LOL....1:19..."part of travelling all over the world and documenting stuff... but we planted the trees also". So let's all plant a tree so we can fly.
Are you kidding me? How many of you are going to make this ridiculous point? Of course he probably got there by plane, but his flight there doesn't contradict his personal convictions, it contradicts the convictions of the ones he's interviewing. How do you people not understand that he wasn't "pointing fingers" about them using a plane, but pointing out the conflict between their action and their words.
you don't understand, i'm sure he doesn't give a rat's ass about planes. his point is that these people say planes are destroying the environment....well they all flew.
if you don't believe there are reasons to reduce carbon emissions, why pose questions meant to 'enlighten' the audience, it doesn't matter right? You can't convince an audience when it's obvious you are not the most intelligent person in the room.
2) "it doesn't matter..."? of course it matters. These are the people pushing to legislate against the free market and capitalism. Getting these people to critically think about their paradigm seems important when what they support will undoubtedly have a drastic effect on our freedoms.
3) Do you have to be the most intelligent person in the room to convince an audience of something?
It's so easy to reveal these morons as phonies, most of them did not even realize how illogical it is to fucking fly somewhere in order to protest carbon emissions.
I think you're missing the point. What was the alternative? A train across the ocean? No. What a waste of everyones time. Instead of criticizing those who traveled so far to support environmentalist ideas we should be asking what can we do to make travel less damaging to the environment...what kinds of planes can be developed for long distance travel that are not harmful? You are asking the wrong questions... its obvious everyone flew; lets dig a little deeper shall we?
These videos are the most ridiculous I have ever seen. Are they supposed to represent a political viewpoint? By asking stupid questions? Is that the anti-environmentalist-movement's way of demasking the
My question to the whole world: why are we flying anywhere when we can connect for the price of an airflight. I mean you can get a lap top for less than $300 these days and do video conferencing. And do I want to sit at a convention with thousands of people who bring their bugs to share and send home with others? Think, world, think, stay at home, quit wasting time and energy, and practice what you preach!
Why would that be "clever"? Shouldn't it have been obvious where he was going with the question once he asked it? The fact that the point this guy was trying to make didn't immediately register as obvious to these people, I believe, points out the more crucial component to their dangerous mentality. Not only are these people hypocrites of their own convictions, but they lack the capacity to connect the dots. Their viewfinder can only see one thing at a time. They compartmentalize their beliefs.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
come on,you call them hypocrites for flying there,they had a few days to travel around the world,do you think they will swim?,i think all of their activist work has done A LOT more good than ONE plane ride did bad,i bet you people havent done shit to help the environment and the millions of animals that die because of it,when you swim around the world to fight for something you beleive in,then you can call them hypocrites
Some of them realize the idiocy in flying there... most of them don't even know why they're there... Simply being there is NOT helping the environment. just because your heart is in the right place doesn't mean your head is. People don't use logic when they see a cuddly polar bear, they use pure emotions. They are hypocrites... They all agree planes are a part of the problem but don't want to restrict themselves from flying on one... When they can make that decision they'll not be hypocrites.
You obviously do not understand the irony. Let me explain with an example: I believe in the individual right to own a firearm. If I were to fight for this belief and it lead me to fly around the world a million times it wouldn't contradict or threaten my belief, therefore I would remain honest or non-hypocritical. The reference to swimming vs. flying had to do with avoiding "carbon output", which is a threat to the belief that these people flew there to discuss.
so true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! all these fucking clowns....if they really believe in g-warming, row-boat your sorry asses to copenhagen. fucking hypocrites and enviro----whackos!!----they are taking over the planet---wake up people!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is indeed a very stupid question. How did this guy himself come there? Be sure that the work of the environmentalists reduces carbon emissions in total. In fact many of them came by train from Europe.
First of all it doesn't matter if he went there by flying cause he's not one of those activist who believes that flying hurts the climate. Secondly dude there's no way that every sinle of them came by train. That's the point from the video he wants to see the people who are HYPOCRITES that are coming by plane and keep bitching about everybody who's flying by plane
Hypocrites. They want to make it so expensive to fly only the state-funded elite will be able to do it.
Search for 'MP's planes and gravy trains' to see how UK politicians spent their time on a tax-payer funded holiday to Tonga to 'investigate' climate change. Parasites.
The hypocrisy just NON STOP, like a freaking 100 season long of reality show....
They believe the worst thing to do is fly, and yet all of them go to that place by flying. Some of them know what Phelim is try to do, and are not happy about it.
So they don't like people creating wealth as it will be supposed indirectly hurt the environment. In another word, they want all people to be poor, at least less rich.
Please, anyone please tell me, what is the different between this and communism???
The guy that says they plan on planting trees to offset the flying...doesn't he realize that trees need CO2 to live? and since they are dependant on a "poisonous" gas to live, they are evil and must be decreased!!!/sarc
Abraham Lincoln once defined a HYPOCRITE: 'a man who murdered both his parents, then pleaded for mercy on the grounds that he was an orphan'.
'Plant a tree to offset my emissions'. My God, are all these environmentalists taking drugs! There's something seriously wrong with them P.S. in more ways than one if you catch my drfit!
MegaPostman77 1 week ago
Naomi Klein is such a great whopping cunt.
CRAPCANNONS 5 months ago
'We planted the trees to offset it... but thanks.'
Good to know they are taking their BS so seriously.
LastCynicStanding 5 months ago
global warming is a money making scam!
TDAProductions12 1 year ago
This is most truthful video I've come to seen on climate change. Thanks for making this issue clearer to everyone.
isocrate27 1 year ago 3
BRILLIANT!!! I LOVE IT... omg the dude that says "we planted trees" did you? Did YOU plant those trees or you paid a little bit of money to a carbon offset company that maybe said something they do somewhere is plant trees?
GuitarGirlWA 1 year ago
Im looking over these comments and i am reminded about the United Nations conference in Montreal on climate change and i think that people should be muchmore informed about what these varying scientists have to say, after all they werent flying to Florida for a stroll along the beach...
thornedbluerose 1 year ago
Most of them didnt even know why it was hypocritical. The one guy said "we planted trees to offset it" AHahahaha.... Global warming is the biggest joke of the 21rst century, easy.
"I think we are done thank you" yes you are done.
"I think you are being invasive" Oh but you were being extremely invasive when you forced your religion on the children of this world and then tried to take it over and shut down western civilization. Thank God you are done.
KingDingaLing090 1 year ago
Not only did they fly, but they didn't take the public transportation and the buses they want everyone else to take.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
Do what we say, not what we do. Hypocritical scum
d2eux 1 year ago 2
The activists did themselves no favour by not actualy tackling this guy on the real issues. Istead they told him to simply go away. Or maybe some of them did but that was just edited out.
TheGill1990 2 years ago 3
Eh obviously they flew in. How else to expect them to lobby the governments to actualy make a change. The americans for example, really need to be whipped into shape, seriously!
TheGill1990 2 years ago
oh Naomi Kikess was there too...?
TheEbonicslover 2 years ago
Why don't they just stop breathing?
Scoforever 2 years ago 2
I flieded to Copenhagen. lulz!!!
LeoBloomWilder 2 years ago
Ahh so only journalists and enviromental activists can destroy the environment?
tubaboy71 2 years ago
The globalists are not only laughing at anybody who dissagrees with them and their AGW scam but they are also laughing at the 'hearts and minds' of all the people who have latched themselves to the un-proven theory of AGW.... These so-called 'climate activists' have been duped by their peers.
acidhead43 2 years ago 4
They want to tell all the rest of us how to live, what size of car to drive on and on and then they acuse this guy of being invasive? cmon.
MrBullfrog9876 2 years ago 4
This is like invading a religious cult. The leader Al Gore is protected from the outside reporters, and the cult followers have no answer for why they do or believe like they do.
MrBullfrog9876 2 years ago 4
Bunch of idiots. That's what you get when it comes to liberal hippy bullshit. Empty people. Say one thing, do the other. Al gore is their leader. A huge joke/scam.
p0479 2 years ago 4
Busted! The global warming bullshit has been busted. The idiots that support this scam show how stupid the whole thing is. Ahhhh Haaaaa!!!!! Idiots!!!!!!!
p0479 2 years ago 11
1:45. He's being invasive?! What are you doing there then bandwagoner?
JesusIsOnTheThrone 2 years ago 3
If you think Co2 warms the planet then ask yourself this.
Co2 reflects infra-red energy back to the surface of the planet then shouldn't it reflect infra red energy back from the sun thus counselling itself out?
I have asked this question on other sites but have not had an answer back.
Well I did get 1 which was that we do not get infra-red from the sun. Poor education I suppose.
skanx65 2 years ago
The Viking farm under the sand in Greenland
The hunters had stumbled on a 500-year-old Viking farm
The Norse arrived in Greenland 1,000 years ago and became very well established
Over the next 300 to 400 years, the meadow soil steadily improved its nutritional qualities, showing that the Greenland Vikings weren't poor farmers
By my maths this means that it was a lot warmer than now even 500 years ago. Does this show on any temperature graphs that are based on this region
skanx65 2 years ago
What a muppet.
KinkyPigStudios 2 years ago
One of the most stupid pseudo-journalists I have ever seen! It would cost more hydrocarbons (combustion/exhaust)
to take the long route by ship! And teleconferencing does not work in such important conferences. so STFU.
TheFreeAdviceMan 2 years ago
Agreed, All high level meetings have to be done face to face. It's the only way.
KinkyPigStudios 2 years ago
They could have used Sail Boats to get there!
It's priceless the way their faces change as they realize what hypocrites they are!
Thanks for doing this, Mr. McAleer.
You are wonderful.
You are doing what real Journalists 'used to do'.
Please keep up the great work!
SeekerNLife 2 years ago
Except they're not generating CO2 to 'show' people the damage. The damage caused by global warming is already apparent to any well-read person.
But seriously answer my question, if a criminal preaches lawfulness, does that render the concept of obeying the law to be completely bunk?
11111110 2 years ago
@11111110
You are a complete moron. Do you cover your ears and yell, "Yaa yaa, yaaa" so you don't hear the truth about global warming ?. Have you never heard of climategate ?.
elmiraviking 2 years ago
Lets pretend for a second that I haven't. Tell me about it.
11111110 2 years ago
@11111110
Why are you trying so hard to justify the actions of these elitists pricks?
Have you seen how rich Al Gore and Maurice Strong are?
How much land they own?
Yet these aholes want us less fortunate folks to suffer?
Dude, get real, wake up...you've been HAD!
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77
Are you against wealthy people? You seem to. Keep in mind global warming stands to devastate the livelihoods of citizens of developing nations and lower-income Americans more than anything.
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
Bullcrap.
We have multi-millionaire, land-owning elitists trying to convince us that we peons need to suffer while they jet around the world going to conferences.
I'm not against wealthy people at all. I'm against wealthy people using govt to run my life and impoverish me.
Al Gore recently bought a house at sea level in Santa Barbara--guess he's not THAT worried, eh?
Are you against non-rich people? You must be if you support economy-killing legislation.
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77
Over planet-destroying legislation? Yes. Though keep in mind its actually the wealthy who suffer the most under government regulation, they pay the most in taxes after all.
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
"Planet-detroying legislation"...LOL...
What are YOU doing to lessen your "carbon footprint"?
Since its "destroying the planet"?
It never ceases to amaze me how easily some people can be manipulated.
There is not a single shred of evidence that mankind using carbon is going to cause the planet to be "destroyed". None. Zilch. Zip. Nada.
As Goebbels said, repeat a lie loud enough, long enough, and it eventually becomes accepted as the truth.
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77
I've been biking as my main form of transportation for the past 2 years, and have made a conscious effort to stop using a/c. Although the actions of any one person is irrelevant on a global scale, your concern about carbon footprints are admirable.
But how do 90% of climate scientists become convinced of man-made global warming without "a single shred of evidence"? I'd love to hear this.
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
I'm not concerned about carbon footprints at all, since it has nothing to do w/global warming.
I said there isn't a shred of evidence that alleged man-caused warming (I thought it was "climate change" now, so that ALL types of weather could be covered?) will lead to the earth being "destroyed".
I don't buy that 90% figure either.
ashane77 1 year ago
@11111110
Were you one of these clueless hypocrites at this conference?
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77
I've never even left the country, no.
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
Its funny how now you Religious Greens--after having been proven frauds in the 1970s w/bogus "global cooling" and AGAIN in the 1990's-00's w/bogus "global warming"--have finally settled of "climate change/disruption" so that ANY kind of weather can be blamed on mankind!
Its amazing you religious zealots aren't laughed out of the room. Guess it helps to have the backing of govts, multi-nat'l corps, the media, schools brainwashing kids, etc. Even with ALL THIS people are skeptical.
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77
The only people who put forward a "global cooling" theory in the 1970's was a small group of scientists who somehow got a lot of media attention at the time. Despite it, there was never anything resembling a scientific consensus. But, do you know if any of the scientists that supported the theory back then support global warming today? Or if they're still alive, for that matter?
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
If I could make one correction though, multi-national corporations are mostly opposed to efforts to counter global warming. That's why you see most global warming skepticism organizations being funded largely by oil companies.
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
Yes, and govts and its dependents (universities) and the tax-exempt arms of corporations fund the pro-warming scientists.
It is INCREDIBLE how much effort (time, money, propaganda campaigns, scaring naive school children, awarding Gore a Nobel, etc.) has been spent trying to convince Americans this is a threat.
ENRON supported Kyoto for Chist's sake!
Oil corporations ALSO fund the pro-warming side and give credence to the scare-campaign. They're gonna make money REGARDLESS
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77
Right, so naturally you should view universities and government institutions as being more credible sources of scientific information than corporations. But that is neither here nor there.
Why does it surprise you in the least that people would spend time and effort into preventing what they believe to be impending ecological and infrastructural destruction at the hands of a rising global temperature? It seems like the rational course of action, to me.
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
Did Climategate not concern you at ALL?
The pro-warming con-men were caught RED-HANDED in their attempts to stifle opponents and inconvenient truths which disputed their claims.
Aren't you the LEAST bit concerned that the pro-warming side is SO DESPERATE to cut off debate?
This well-organized scare campaign has been in the works a LONG time:
google: " How They Are Turning Off the Lights in America
by Edwin X Berry"
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77 EXCERPT:
I was the first to raise my hand to ask a question, "How can you defend your global warming hypothesis when you have omitted the effects of clouds which affect heat balance far more than carbon dioxide, and when your hypothesis contradicts the paper by Lee in the Journal of Applied Meteorology in 1972 that shows the atmosphere does not behave like a greenhouse?"
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77 CONT'D
He answered me by saying, "You do not know what you are talking about. I know more about how the atmosphere works than you do."
Not being one to drop out of a fight, I responded, "I know many of the atmospheric scientists in this room, and many others who are not present but I do not know you. What is your background and what makes you know so much more than me?"
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77 CONT'D
He answered, "I know more than you because I am a lawyer and I work for the EPA."
After the meeting, many of my atmospheric science friends who worked for public agencies thanked me for what I said, saying they would have liked to say the same thing but they feared for their jobs.
And that, my dear readers, is my recollection of that great day when a lawyer, acting as a scientist, working for the federal government, announced global warming.
This was back in 1988!
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77
Its fairly routine in the scientific community for individuals who make assertions or conflicting claims without evidence to be ignored, or not taken seriously. It'd be even more frightening if the scientific establishment would be ground to a halt by having to devote all of its time and resources to the appeasement of conspiracy theorists and outright lunatics. 9/11 truthers make the same complaints when engineers and other scientists won't take their papers seriously either.
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
It's the duty of any scientist to consider ALL data, so long as the data is viable, relevant, and obtained through a reliable methodology. It is not their job, however, to have to attempt to have a rational discourse with anyone who makes an assertion based on what is clearly flawed reasoning.
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
Climategate, bitch!
ashane77 1 year ago
@11111110
Except we're NOT talking about a small, fringe group of "nuts" that dispute the Green Religions' claims that the sky is falling, but 1000's and 1000's of legit scientists. The UN--a gagggle of loser politicians and special interest groups--has been the biggest propagator of lies and alarmism.
It has been the ESTABLISHMENT, not ordinary people, who've been trying SO desperately to convince everyone that "WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!" unless we give up more freedom.
ashane77 1 year ago
@ashane77
Relatively speaking, yes, we are talking about a fringe. Thousands of scientist are willing to toss their credibility around and make ecological claims, even when their Ph.Ds lie in the field of political science, or theology, or engineering, or any number of unrelated fields. I can find hundreds of scientists that will tell you that 9/11 was an inside job. Of course, none of those scientist have a degree in engineering. There is a reason for that.
11111110 1 year ago
@11111110
And its odd that you would exclude scientists from the category of "ordinary people". I'd like to think that we as a society don't dehumanize people simply for being educated. Unlike the special interest groups and corporate lobbyists, a scientist is not required to maximize profit, but to simply pursue the objective and falsifiable truth. That is what defines them. If we can't trust the people who's job requires them to adhere to objectivity, than who can we trust?
11111110 1 year ago
Air travel; the most inefficient ever.
richardruhe 2 years ago
@richardruhe
Yeah, then go swim to Copenhagen.
elmiraviking 2 years ago
as soon as I get the urge to control the world with 'carbon', I will. Till then I'll catch Hamlet on video.
richardruhe 2 years ago
it would take more than one tree to offset a flight wouldn't it ?
kellyelainewright61 2 years ago
"We planted the trees to offset it though". What a load of bullshit. Sounds like his Bizzaroworld Messiah AlGore, exceept Al makes money off of the bullshit.
nomosocialists 2 years ago
How is it bullshit? Trees consume CO2. Its a scientific fact, not some element of Bizzaroworld.
11111110 2 years ago
You can tell by the way he said it that it was untrue. Typical Leftliar. You would have to plant one huge buttload of trees to offset all the spew from COP. I wonder if your friends on the Left who committed arson planted trees to offset the fires they started? I wonder if they planted trees to offset all of the teargas that was required to deal with them?
nomosocialists 2 years ago 2
@11111110 ,
It's bullshit because to offset the CO2 they generated flying to Copenhagen, it would require many thousands of tree's.
elmiraviking 2 years ago 2
Someone who is as concerned about CO2 output as you surely must be working diligently to reverse global deforestation. I know I am.
11111110 2 years ago
what an absolutely moronic, silly point. This nitwit needs to find something else to do. Of course they flew there you moron!
tevans76 2 years ago
naomi klein commie bitch traitor.
matsutakneatche 2 years ago 2
You know those jokes that have the Irish Mick as the dumb ass in the punch line. Is this the guy? What is the point of making this stuff up! just try to use less energy and be more productive and respectful to the place that sustains life to your dumb ass. And whats wrong with that?
Se this is what happens when priests fiddle- didle there alter boys they grow up to be this dick.
Just put your river dance tape on have some boiled taties and chill the fuck out.
homeplan20 2 years ago
@homeplan20, A priest fiddle diddled you!
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago
Your just jealous.. you love that shit!
homeplan20 2 years ago
@homoplan20, Of what that crusty piece of fur you call your boyfriend?
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago
Well you keep playing hard to get after that one time at the gay Nra meeting you said you would call. BITCH!!
homeplan20 2 years ago
it's okay for them to fly because the environmentalists are superior to the rest of us
hookemhornmom 2 years ago
If they really cared about the environment, they would have used skype.
shera818 2 years ago 3
"But we planted the trees to offset it"...what a douche.
LawyerScumGhost 2 years ago
They just smile and admit it? Typical hypocritical liberal scum of the fucking earth.
maximusdecimus888 2 years ago 17
I disagree with his basic premise. They aren't just wrong, They are evil !
hobo59 2 years ago 3
Naomi Klein is a babe, but she seems to be a typical rich liberal who beleives she is an intellectual elite.
arbide2 2 years ago
This sums up these people...this video needs to get more coverage..
maevee19 2 years ago 5
hmmm those assholes admit they are idiots? hmhmmmhm
187wade 2 years ago 3
LOL GREAT!!!!!!!!!!!!
I just made a fire I fill all worm & fuzzy
1inkdaddy 2 years ago
OK, so maybe it is really necessary to go to this conference, and there is no other option then to go by plane. But what about the frequent flyer miles they get from this trip, they won't use them for leisure flights right?
AV3051 2 years ago
Comment removed
AV3051 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
seriously, Mr. Phelim McAleer is one of those pestering journalists. This is no way of flouting the right to speech and debate. There has to be an element of respect and dignity maintained. The UN guards, rightfully, ordered him harshly for being a bug to Schneider and Al Gore.
anand108 2 years ago
And if he were instead a typical liberal journalist badgering a climate change "denier" or a right wing politician would you feel the same way? No, you would then say he was doing his job.
dogsbd 2 years ago
What these enviroMENTALISTS need to understand is its not transportation but fuel that is harming the environment. we cant do without transport. they need to be fighting for real alternative fuels not against transport. If we can invent the nuclear bomb we can damn well invent a safe fuel. but the oil cartels are very powerful.
trussmaker 2 years ago 3
It is a shame to be hypocritical, although hypocrisy doesn't always mean much. The CO2 generated by the conference, while large, is an insignificant expenditure when compared to the amount of CO2 emissions that will, hopefully, be averted as a result.
Do the dangers of drug abuse become a farce when preached by a drug addict? Is a criminal not allowed to encourage lawfulness?
11111110 2 years ago
"you know... it's just part of... you know... traveling the world documenting stuff..."
LULZ!!!
LeoBloomWilder 2 years ago 2
Do any of those people work or are the just professional victims?
bpentium 2 years ago 3
Very funny.
chinacat22 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my classic "al gore is a dickhead " On my channel and my most recent climategate climate fraud.
hijackednation 2 years ago
If they were so concerned about the environment, why wasn't this whole conference held via the internet? We surely have the technology to have held this via video conferencing! Hypocrites.
millertime355 2 years ago
Naomi Klein... not a shred of wit or grace. That's what passes for an "intellectual" on the left.
OccidentalSoapbox 2 years ago 2
All this fuckers walking around and spreading the scam will be out of jobs if the scare is exposed
CoPiloT21 2 years ago
Hey guys, try making products that can get you to your conference without producing massive co2.
A jet liner gets about 70 mpg/passenger, but driving a car with 6 people in it can get 125 mpg/passenger... why not.
Clearly internet conferencing would save about 99.999% of the carbon "footprint" but that wouldn't be full of hypocrisy now would it...
Guys, get a life... Wake up...game over.
Great video, keep up the good work...
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago
There's any number of good reasons to be disgusted with this farce, but this clown (McAleer) is a bore. How would he have had these people show up in Copenhagen anyway? Most of those there represent 100's to millions of people, so the cost of airfare and the carbon is a relative bargain. It's this kind of childish nonsense that makes the opposition seem credible.
JamesKayten 2 years ago
I'm not sure but I think I'm using one of al gore's creations called the internet right now. I've never done it myself but I believe the great technology invented by mr. gore allows people across the world to meet via the magic of the internet. but it's not as fun to brag to your friends about your teleconference as it is to brag about your private jet and first class hotel stay. global government here we come! (just make sure you ride your bike)
glenndough79 2 years ago
Wrong AND evil.
ThorkilKowalski 2 years ago
Climategate. Do as I say, not as I do, and no matter how much we fake the results, don't question it !
edisoncarter1985 2 years ago 2
Amend seanboy80, you have clarity of vision and couldn't have said it better myself.
If bowing bam signs this crap and and the meat in congress (that is bought, sold and traded by elitists) passes it, then time to become a career criminal and take from the system rather then put into it.
chessgame1960 2 years ago
don't worry, lord Obama's Utopian fleet of flying unicorns will be able to catch all of them.
MulligansValley 2 years ago
Can't blame them really. Gore and his business partners from Goldman Sachs and Enron aren't the only one's who will clean up in this scam. There's lots of money to be made in this scam, even lower level peddlers and snake oil shysters like these people.
seanboy80 2 years ago
Sorry to tell you Seanboy, but Enron went out of business in 2001, so it a little hard for them to "clean up" on the scam. Even the evil Ken Lay died in 2006. You may want to do a little more research in who is behind this fraud against the world. p.s. Bush lost the election so he is out of the loop too.
edisoncarter1985 2 years ago
Comment removed
seanboy80 2 years ago
My father once said, "I would never tell you to do something I would not do myself." I applaud people who live the life they profess, even if I don't agree with it.
The people in these videos must realize that they are not important to the Copenhagen treaty process.
Why are they there? They tell us to stop wasting our resources yet here they are, joining in events which do not pertain to the actual treaty but the city wide rally which supports it. Wasting paper, fuel, electricity, etc.
goingalt 2 years ago
next time they should have thier conference on-line and stop being such hypocrites.
remotehog1 2 years ago
Man Bear Pig!
TheDrZeus 2 years ago
unbelievable yet believable at the same time. what these people want to stop is "ordinary" people (the plebs) flying off to spain, greece etc on cheap flights once a year. they don't consider anything they do as hypocritical in the slightest. if ever there is a case of "do as i say not as i do", this is it! they should all be horse whipped, especially that klein woman, mind you , she'd probably enjoy it. the sarcastic bitch.
faustomasic 2 years ago
Frigging silly crap. We are not going to stop flying in planes are driving cars, and no one is suggesting that we should. But we can make the planes and cars we do use pollute less as generally live our lives in a more environmentally friendly fashion. Produce less trash, use less fuel, make less noise. This reporter is showing just how ignorant he and others like him are.
carldchurch 2 years ago
what in the video shows "just how ignorant he" is?
MulligansValley 2 years ago
These "climate change" people, while holding some legitimacy to their concerns, are very dishonest. They are the same people, who in California, push solar panel farms, and then hire lawyers to block the transmission lines over the Mountains! There is a sewage crisis in the developing world...but whatever! right!
Gyrode 2 years ago
But you see, sewage treatment plants are too concrete, there is not enough social activism bullshit to make it cloudy enough to get a set amount of graft, I mean money, but "climate change" is right on the money!
Gyrode 2 years ago
A smart answer would have been, "We had about 10 members who wanted to come to copenhagen but in an effort to redusce carbon emissions we voted on only 2 representatives of our organization to make the trip. Although we realize all flights create carbon emissions we hope that by cutting down on the number of those attending we were able to make a difference" - easy.
GarciaDavid1979 2 years ago
I am against the Global warming hoax but i think these questions don't really prove anything.
Of course you have to fly to a conference in copenhagen. What do you expect them to do?
MaHaRushie 2 years ago
Global warming is not a "hoax," but the notion that economies can do anything to stop it (within the allowances of these damn Luddites) is at the core of the problem. "Social Activism" is a great business. Waters will rise somewhat, and NOBODY is talking about levees, I mean, the Netherlands is based on it!
Gyrode 2 years ago
Gyrode, Ok, global warming is not a "hoax", how about a fraud ? The world has been given proof that the "science" behind global warming / global cooling / climate change / ( insert next years name here ) was faked to produce the "science", government grants, movies, books, and ... a Nobel prize.
edisoncarter1985 2 years ago
@edisoncarter1985 I am more concerned about how they try to "fix" the problem. They are luddites, and are allergic to nuclear power for example, we have to stop burning coal no matter what, but these bastards are anti nuclear, and conservation-only is crap. "Social Activism" is a great business when you get government money!
Gyrode 2 years ago
most of them don't even seem to realise what they're saying..
simondwilkinson 2 years ago
LOL....1:19..."part of travelling all over the world and documenting stuff... but we planted the trees also". So let's all plant a tree so we can fly.
werksdesign 2 years ago 2
I just find it tasteless that the man is using such a weak question of someone's "character" to illustrate hypocrisy on an important issue.
Seriously, plane rides? I'm almost CERTAIN that he got there on a plane too. Don't start pointin' fingers buddy.
dohacheese 2 years ago
Are you kidding me? How many of you are going to make this ridiculous point? Of course he probably got there by plane, but his flight there doesn't contradict his personal convictions, it contradicts the convictions of the ones he's interviewing. How do you people not understand that he wasn't "pointing fingers" about them using a plane, but pointing out the conflict between their action and their words.
MulligansValley 2 years ago
you don't understand, i'm sure he doesn't give a rat's ass about planes. his point is that these people say planes are destroying the environment....well they all flew.
Colluctor 2 years ago 4
LOLOLOLOL
NightDen 2 years ago
yes, you're right, they don't find anything wrong with flying, but the irony is lost on me.
jesuswasntjewish 2 years ago
if you don't believe there are reasons to reduce carbon emissions, why pose questions meant to 'enlighten' the audience, it doesn't matter right? You can't convince an audience when it's obvious you are not the most intelligent person in the room.
jesuswasntjewish 2 years ago
My response to your post has 3 parts:
1) huh?
2) "it doesn't matter..."? of course it matters. These are the people pushing to legislate against the free market and capitalism. Getting these people to critically think about their paradigm seems important when what they support will undoubtedly have a drastic effect on our freedoms.
3) Do you have to be the most intelligent person in the room to convince an audience of something?
MulligansValley 2 years ago
How did you get your crew there? If you didn't fly or drive I assume you all arrived on a massive tandem bicycle.
jesuswasntjewish 2 years ago
but he isn't the one telling people to stop flying, they are.
nickel407 2 years ago 2
It's so easy to reveal these morons as phonies, most of them did not even realize how illogical it is to fucking fly somewhere in order to protest carbon emissions.
LawyerScumGhost 2 years ago
Hasn't anyone heard of teleconferencing? Doesn't this seem like fulfilling a lifestyle? Sort of like a pilgrimage to Mecca?
kickbox11 2 years ago
Globull/Climate change is such Hogwash.
AllianceCrusha 2 years ago
I think you're missing the point. What was the alternative? A train across the ocean? No. What a waste of everyones time. Instead of criticizing those who traveled so far to support environmentalist ideas we should be asking what can we do to make travel less damaging to the environment...what kinds of planes can be developed for long distance travel that are not harmful? You are asking the wrong questions... its obvious everyone flew; lets dig a little deeper shall we?
kevinjmckenzie 2 years ago
These videos are the most ridiculous I have ever seen. Are they supposed to represent a political viewpoint? By asking stupid questions? Is that the anti-environmentalist-movement's way of demasking the
Tiwaz1337 2 years ago
what a bunch of idiots
linkin622 2 years ago
My question to the whole world: why are we flying anywhere when we can connect for the price of an airflight. I mean you can get a lap top for less than $300 these days and do video conferencing. And do I want to sit at a convention with thousands of people who bring their bugs to share and send home with others? Think, world, think, stay at home, quit wasting time and energy, and practice what you preach!
protester 2 years ago
Why would that be "clever"? Shouldn't it have been obvious where he was going with the question once he asked it? The fact that the point this guy was trying to make didn't immediately register as obvious to these people, I believe, points out the more crucial component to their dangerous mentality. Not only are these people hypocrites of their own convictions, but they lack the capacity to connect the dots. Their viewfinder can only see one thing at a time. They compartmentalize their beliefs.
MulligansValley 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
come on,you call them hypocrites for flying there,they had a few days to travel around the world,do you think they will swim?,i think all of their activist work has done A LOT more good than ONE plane ride did bad,i bet you people havent done shit to help the environment and the millions of animals that die because of it,when you swim around the world to fight for something you beleive in,then you can call them hypocrites
ianmauche 2 years ago
Some of them realize the idiocy in flying there... most of them don't even know why they're there... Simply being there is NOT helping the environment. just because your heart is in the right place doesn't mean your head is. People don't use logic when they see a cuddly polar bear, they use pure emotions. They are hypocrites... They all agree planes are a part of the problem but don't want to restrict themselves from flying on one... When they can make that decision they'll not be hypocrites.
toshzpelta 2 years ago
You obviously do not understand the irony. Let me explain with an example: I believe in the individual right to own a firearm. If I were to fight for this belief and it lead me to fly around the world a million times it wouldn't contradict or threaten my belief, therefore I would remain honest or non-hypocritical. The reference to swimming vs. flying had to do with avoiding "carbon output", which is a threat to the belief that these people flew there to discuss.
MulligansValley 2 years ago
Obama got elected with two words. HOPE and CHANGE. Hypocricy Of Political Elitists and Communism Happens And Nobody Gets Equality!
12Hollywoodkevin 2 years ago
so true!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! all these fucking clowns....if they really believe in g-warming, row-boat your sorry asses to copenhagen. fucking hypocrites and enviro----whackos!!----they are taking over the planet---wake up people!!!!!!!!!!!!!
rocketman6464 2 years ago 4
lts nice to know the socialite with the orange mob can't remember how many times she's taken a flight, me personally
twice, to and back in 1986 thats it,
and l've never driven a car in my life.
What other trendy party dress up has she attended on her many flights?
These people need some kind of hardship to enter their consciousness instead of a repeated chant that being the mantra of the Climate Change Scam.
SteeAsp 2 years ago
lol try watching this while listening to Frank's song
kancerzx 2 years ago
You wonder how these people can still look at themselfs in the mirror, so sad.
Caesar0031 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is indeed a very stupid question. How did this guy himself come there? Be sure that the work of the environmentalists reduces carbon emissions in total. In fact many of them came by train from Europe.
hagelslag27 2 years ago
First of all it doesn't matter if he went there by flying cause he's not one of those activist who believes that flying hurts the climate. Secondly dude there's no way that every sinle of them came by train. That's the point from the video he wants to see the people who are HYPOCRITES that are coming by plane and keep bitching about everybody who's flying by plane
jagal1990 2 years ago 3
Moronic idiot, next time you think about commenting, don't.
toshzpelta 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Stupid question.
elkellenhabla 2 years ago
shoot them all in the head
SHMUJEW 2 years ago 2
Let them all paddle home in canoes made from recycled newspapers
carlfinkle 2 years ago
I just love this clip. You, sir, have just made me a subscriber :)
tomsawyersociety666 2 years ago 2
Marxist bastards. Every last one of them.
tl1358 2 years ago 5
Living proof that the dumbshits rule...
wellcraft28 2 years ago 8
They're all laughing when they answer.
They know "Climate Change" is bullshit,so don't expect us to believe it.
starstar001 2 years ago 7
BOOOMMM, SHAK-A-LAKA!
RCinPAWA 2 years ago 2
Hypocrites. They want to make it so expensive to fly only the state-funded elite will be able to do it.
Search for 'MP's planes and gravy trains' to see how UK politicians spent their time on a tax-payer funded holiday to Tonga to 'investigate' climate change. Parasites.
Noodles691 2 years ago
Maybe next time they can ride in on the back of a polar bear.
RemoSC49 2 years ago 3
The hypocrisy just NON STOP, like a freaking 100 season long of reality show....
They believe the worst thing to do is fly, and yet all of them go to that place by flying. Some of them know what Phelim is try to do, and are not happy about it.
So they don't like people creating wealth as it will be supposed indirectly hurt the environment. In another word, they want all people to be poor, at least less rich.
Please, anyone please tell me, what is the different between this and communism???
newtestube 2 years ago 5
Douchebag Summit
robisfunky 2 years ago 3
The guy that says they plan on planting trees to offset the flying...doesn't he realize that trees need CO2 to live? and since they are dependant on a "poisonous" gas to live, they are evil and must be decreased!!!/sarc
shimauma42 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
seriago 2 years ago
Yep they look stupid in front of the world and they know it.
KingDingaLing090 2 years ago 4
Their dumb smiles and debonair attitudes make me sick...especially that comment: ''I think you are being invasive, now."
Folks like that need to bury themselves in their basement for ever.
Their ignorance, hypocrisy, arrogance are showing their true colors now: green on the outside with red fillings..
alleyghost 2 years ago 9
Well said.
order9066 2 years ago
Pure hypocrisy!!! But atleast that one lady owned up to herself being a hypocrite. lol
JSharmaine 2 years ago 6
Naomi Klein the socialist, durr.
Vitaminous 2 years ago 4
I didn't know who she was.
JSharmaine 2 years ago