Nikola Tesla's Gravity in two minutes.

[eflwinnie]

I love Tesla forever. Super cool man!

[nickharvey7]

@eflwinnie Thanks! I am an artist and therefore outside of the scientific community so any help promoting this theory will be gratefully welcomed. Please share with your friends and add to your favorites. It would be nice to start a chain reaction of information a kind of quantum revolution!

[aqouby]

@nickharvey7 I was just wondering, what about coronal heating then? Shouldn't this theory drive the corona of stars to start absorbing more and more gravitational pull because of the immense heat just off the surface?

[yoda6523]

The Earth must be itself; a standing-wave!

Collective unconscious spherical positron In-wave fronts enfolding Time multipying at right-angle's causing wave-center's to invert inward elongated like the petals of a flower!

Time runs more slowly down a mine than on the surface, even though the force of gravity is less thay say!, wave-centers would be shaped more like an egg! or prehaps its waves from the surrounding mass just increases the photon-electron coupling thus mass dividing acceleration?

[nickharvey7]

@yoda6523 I like to think of it as waves within waves little waves on the surface of large waves and large waves made of an infinity of little waves all within their own created reference frame. This might sound mad but is possible because the potential of the w-function Ψ squared just like water waves! We have an ocean of possibilities in a sea of EMW.

[aqouby]

@yoda6523 Yer fuckin' loopy dude

[yoda6523]

Yep!, I agree! Only becoming can I see, "only locally and logically," and, with Quantum Atom Theory it's easy to see, there is no spooky action inbetween you and me!, or any-other point of space becoming to be, forever and now just a moment within it's infinite sea."

[nickharvey7]

@yoda6523 Einstein’s spooky action at a distance “nonlocality” only makes sense if we have a process of continuous creation where each new photon oscillation is a new moment of that creation. The polarization or spin of a photon will be the same for the whole surface of the light sphere having opposite spin simultaneously on both sides of the sphere in three dimensional space.

[yoda6523]

There is only two wave's

Collective Unconscious Spherical positron In-wave fronts enfolding Time multiplying at right-angle's forming+/-breaking at every point of space thus virtual pair's

Collective unconscious-wave's forming electrical potential when we rise to sleep! Storing information potential So that when we feel a jolt awakening back within coincidence; equal+/-opposite - Energy equals Mass dividing acceleration of consciousness Everything Grows+/-from the Astral Light as time unfolds

[nickharvey7]

@yoda6523 In this theory the atoms interact with EMW forming wave particle duality. We see and feel this as the flow of time and because we are made of atoms we can interact creating our own future. But the atoms and elements can be seen as standing waves themselves standing within the continuous flow of time.

[SVWillmer]

Dark Energy, Dark matter, no modern science institute can explain them, they use these terms to explain a form deviant from the model they have been taught. And as modern science progresses more and more of these terms are surfacing because they cannot explain them with their theories. Physics needs stripping down and rebuilding because more and more discovery is shining light and very bizarre physics that doesn't fit our model which is over 100 YEARS OLD. Time for science to grow up.

[nickharvey7]

@SVWillmer Yes I agree totally!

[szGabor93]

If we assume that atoms emitt radiation, due to their "vibration" which is equivalent with their mass, then energy carried by radiation must be come from somewhere, and if it comes from the vibration of the atom, then the constant mass of elementary particles would decrease, and it could be measured in laboratory. Or did i misunderstand something?

[SMILJANable]

EINSTAIN WAS NOT A PHYSICIST. HE WAS ORDINARY MAN WITH NO INTEREST IN SCIENCE. WHEN ORIGINAL PAPERS WITH TEORY OF GENERAL RELATIVITY PRODUCED BY MILEVA MARIC EINSTEIN'S FIRST WIFE GOT LOST, EINSTAIN WAS ASKED BY MEDIA TO PRODUCE NEW PAPERS HE COULD NOT DO IT.

TESLA WAS GENIUS THINKER, SCIENTISTS, DISCOVERER. THERE IS NO SUCH A THINK WERE SCIENTIFICAL DISCOVERER IS NOT ALSO A THINKER.

EINSTEIN WAS WALKING AROUND TALKING NUISANCE, AND HE WAS TOLD BY HIS JEWISH COUNTRY MAN TO SHUT UP.

[dullblades]

@SMILJANable Einstein changed the world. Tesla never predicted time dilation. It wasn't necessary in a world where the dominant theory included the luminiferous ether and time was linear. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed to produce any evidence for the luminiferous ether, which led to Einstein's study of light, which led to the special theory of relativity, which led to the general theory.

also, if you're going to try to speak english, please take the time to actually learn the language.

[SVWillmer]

@dullblades

Tesla invented alternating current and is the GOD of all electrical creations, thus GOD of all we have today. Einstein cracked energy and mass. Which gave the world the atom bomb, so yeah, he changed the world alright. Sure we have his theories of gravitation and relativity but they even break down at the limits of what we know. Like Einstein built upon Newton, we must now build upon Einstein... and out of the box thinking will do so, not quoting text books at people.

[MrShaziman]

@SVWillmer Not forgetting also that Einstein was plagued by 'plagiarism' charges from the inception of his scientific career. He and his jewish buddies regarded it as 'antisemitism'. It wasn't antisemitism at all. It 'was' plagiarism. German and other scientists had done all the work on Relativity (not that I regard it as a true science) before him, but he was promoted as the 'great' originator of it all and no credit was given to anyone before him. The world owes very little to Einstein.

[UnderManlac]

@MrShaziman Einstein was german, so he could not accuse anyone of antisemitism. Einstein was a scientist, a physicist. You have your history completely wrong.

[MrShaziman]

@UnderManlac Einstein was a German Jew, jew as the operative word. Yes, he 'can' accuse others of antisemitism. No Sir, I don't have my history wrong. A German jew is not a German white Christian. They are of different races and different religions. And they can fight with each other as so often happens in many places.

[UnderManlac]

@SVWillmer Show me Newton's explanation of the nature of gravity and light. Newton figured out the speed at which all objects fall to the ground. He did not explain, or have the slightest idea, what gravity was. Science did not know it either. It took Einstein's genius to explain gravity, his theories have been tested and hold true.

[UnderManlac]

@SVWillmer You can't compare Tesla and Einstein, it's like comparing apples to fish. Tesla, inventor. Einstein, physicist.

[nickharvey7]

@UnderManlac Einstein never explained how mass curves space, but in this theory objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because it has the slowest rate or flow of time. Gravity is the same force as inertia therefore we have the principle of equivalence between gravity and acceleration.

[MrShaziman]

@dullblades Yes, the Michelson - Morley experiment never produced evidence of the ether, but what kind of ether were they looking for? The ether surrounding the earth would be a 'rigidified' ether due to the earth's magnetic field and electromagnetic forces. If they were not taking this into acount when they did their experiment, their results would be skewed. Tesla created the electric UFO based on the existence of the ether. I have seen those with 'long' trails of light behind them.

[UnderManlac]

@MrShaziman There still remains NO evidence of an ether. Now seeing that you believe in UFO's I see where you get your delusional ideas. By UFO I mean flying saucers, not just objects that fly and are difficult to identify.

[MrShaziman]

@UnderManlac I don't spend too much thought on the ether. If it exists, it exists. If it doesn't, it doesn't. i saw UFOs in Guyana, South America in 1985. 3 of them (real flying saucers with long luminous trails behind them) and no doubt they were unconventonal craft. No sound at all. Just silently going right over our heads. I believe in ufos because I saw them with my own eyes. They were not meteors and no misunderstanding. Was in the newspaper and people also saw them in Trinidad, West Indies

[nickharvey7]

@MrShaziman Einstein never explained how mass curves space, but in this theory objects just free-fall towards the greatest mass or energy because it has the slowest rate or flow of time. Gravity is the same force as inertia therefore we have the principle of equivalence between gravity and acceleration.

[dallyhorse]

I don't know what Tesla's theory of gravity really was but it doesn't take a lot of research to figure for yourself that it has nothing to do with whatever this video is about.

[shackupyourstruly]

That's where gravity comes from? Electromagnetic radiation?

[FlaiteOne]

electromagnetic radiation creating gravitational forces is what tesla claimed tto be the "ether"?

[marcusgael]

@FlaiteOne

This may help: Aether is all pervasive and exists in a dynamic state of rest (just like a coiled spring). Spatial release of this tension gives rise to (inward) spiralling movement of EMR. EMR becomes intensely concentrated producing physical matter (electrons, protons etc.). As more and more EMR is converted into matter the influence of gravity becomes more pervasive allowing large physical structure (planets, stars and galaxies) to manifest. Thus gravity is a by-product of EMR.

[FlaiteOne]

Lol tesla is such a scientific beast peoples...

[jqs1943]

If one believes that science is unquestionably supreme in design, that would leave no margin for improvement within the lemits of ones reason. If one believes wholeheartedly that what others say or writte about science as being the ultimate state of reasoning over knowledge, he/she is gullible and would never be recorded in anyones memoir as a person having an individual will to think on his own and design a path for others to follow that lids somewhere specific.

BUY MADE IN THE USA .

[jqs1943]

@jqs1943 Inaslong as scientists continue to follow the current atomic theory, uncovering the fact about matter and developing synthetic intrinsic lattices of matter under controlled conditions will never become a reality. A atom is a very simple devise of nature that represents everything that there is of the physical worlds, and i believe that it can be replicated.

Divide earth's diameter by its age and work it down to the one second time period. The result is the average diameter of an atom.

[UnderManiac]

@jqs1943 I don't get the divide the Earth's diameter by it's age analogy. So, if you divide the moon's diameter by it's age, or the sun's, Jupiter's? They have all different values. How does that correspond to the diameter of an atom? That's like making a comparison between a person's eye colour and the place they work. It's a non-sequitor.

[jqs1943]

@jqs1943 The X-gravitational field factor of the worlds is the cumulative energy that establishes the fabric of space by way of conjointly creating the orbital corridors of the worlds.

Time is a rationalized human concept devised for the sole purpose of relating events to a fixed point that's associated to a stationary reference, and motion. It's etherel in essence and has no physical bearing whatsoever of substance. It's an incosolable abstract of reason that deals strictly in logic.

[UnderManiac]

@jqs1943 So, why does Einstein's theory regarding gravity work so perfectly, with observations that confirm it's validity? Why does there have to be an x-gravity? That would be like matter pushing space-time away instead of bending it inward, towards itself.

Explain how light bends around massive objects in space (gravitational lensing). What does x-gravity say about that? Einstein's theory explains it beautifully, and has been confirmed on several observations.

[MrShaziman]

@UnderManiac Gravitational lensing does not exist. There are massive objects ejected by parent galaxies on both sides of the galaxy and this is what they call gravitational lensing. It is all caused by electric forces. These objects were predicted by Hannes Alfven, the founder or one of the founders of plasma cosmology many years ago. You think the establishment would consider anything non-Einsteinian? No Sir. Light can bend near a sun because of plasma. A sun's atmosphere is rich with plasma.

[UnderManlac]

@MrShaziman I don't know where you learned your physics, but gravitational lensing has been proven by experiments by many publicists. Apparently, your information is flawed. Light bends due to gravity. Light also bends when it enters, or leaves, an object such as glass or water, something with a different density than the substance it was in before it entered the denser object. Magnetism can also affect light, since it is electro-magnetic.

[MrShaziman]

@UnderManlac If the Establishment tells you it has been proven by experiments, they are lying. No surprise there anyway. Everything is proven until one starts to look deeper. I don't have a problem with all kinds of refraction. Yes, ionized gas can also produce refraction. I have a problem with Relativism, empty space curving anything. According to Einstein, it is 'space curvature' that causes gravity. All aberations are caused by something we know about; yes, glass, gas, water etc.

[UnderManiac]

@jqs1943 I certainly don't think science has all the answers. That's why there is so much debate in quantum physics. I believe nature (macro and nano) is much easier to understand. We just haven't found a sound theory yet. As interesting as quantum physics is (string theory, m theory, etc), I believe they have it wrong. If someone could come up with a more rational theory, I'm willing to listen and weigh it.

[jqs1943]

A gravitational force field is as invisible as are your thoughts, however; just as your thoughts cause effect so does gravity and X-gravity on matter. Be real...

BUY AMERICAN MADE PRODUCTS - HELP THE U.S. ECCONOMY!!!

[jqs1943]

What type of fabric is space made off that can be bent by mass or time? Gravity does not repel anything, but X-gravity does at a rate of .0735 lbs. sq. in./ mile. Gravity does not attreact either; it pushes down at a rate of .0735 lbs. sq. in./linear mile. I've calculated this from facts and not from an imaginary abstract. The weight of mass in kilograms has no bearing whatsoever on my revelation, for it can just as well be meassured in tons. The weight factor of gravity starts at the exosphere.

[UnderManiac]

@jqs1943 Space-time is only conceptualized as a fabric to make it easier to understand. Space is not bent by time. Space and time are parts of the same thing. They're intertwined and inseparable. Matter bends space-time around it (in all 4 dimensions). Gravity is not a repulsive or attractive force. The Earth (matter) causes a gravity well in space-time. Objects follow the curve of space-time to the surface of the Earth.

[UnderManiac]

@jqs1943 Show me X-gravity.  How did you come up with the idea of x-gravity? Where in nature (anywhere) is x-gravity exhibited? Is this just more mathematics like m theory stating there are 11 dimensions, with no way to prove the theory?

[jqs1943]

Time is a concept of motion that relates to an stationary point of reference which was created by men in order to mark past event or to anticipate those that are planed or consequential to action that are yet pass.

Electromagnetism is an inherent component of the harmonics of an array of frequencies that resonate at an specific value which relate to magnetism, just as is a gravitational force field, electricity and all other souces of naturally existing energies.

[jqs1943]

@jqs1943 Most of the concepts of light and gravity are wrong. We as humans tend to accept much of what we are taught without discriminating between the teachings and what may be considered to be a reactive analitical deduction of what we know that is and what we are taught.

As long as menkind continues to accept the atomic theory and all others without relevant exercise over reason, science will never be able to create synthetic lattices of matter. REASON OVER MY THEORY AND PERHAPS YOU WILL!

[UnderManiac]

@jqs1943 So, what makes you think your theories are better than the ones science gives us? If you think you are onto something breakthrough, why not publish your theories in a reputable scientific journal for peer review?

The stuff we are taught by science has been tested and coincides their theories very well. Can you say the same? Have you been able to create synthetic lattices of matter? Theories need rigorous testing.

[jqs1943]

@UnderManiac WAS IT YOU THE ONE WHO WROTE: "I SOMETIMES FEEL THAT IF WE PUT THE SAME AMOUNT OF ENERGY INTO TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE UNIVERSE AS WE DO DISAGREEING WITH OTHERS, WE MIGHT UNDERSTAND WHERE WE ARE???"

Reason has a direct association to substance; science is an abstract of reason that we utilize to manipulate substance or the essence of something, or someone.

[UnderManiac]

@jqs1943 No, that wasn't me. I don't normally write with caps lock on. I am putting about 90% of my energy into trying to figure out the universe. With quantum physics, string theory, and m theory, it's not so easy. I got tons of questions and nobody to ask them, other doing web searches.

[UnderManiac]

@jqs1943 Show me a gravitational force field, please.

[jqs1943]

Light is a reactive component of matter that manifests ethereal when matter is excited by the extremely high frequencies of black energy.

[nickharvey7]

@jqs1943 Can you define black energy?

[neuspeed79]

@nickharvey7 is the stuff you can't see but is there.. lol

[jqs1943]

Light does not travel as it is an inherent reaction of matter that radiates its spectrum when excited by black energy. Excerpt from "SUNOTICS" the theory. Matter's spectral reactive speed is approximetely equal to 186,000 miles per second.

[jqs1943]

@jqs1943 A gravitational force field consists of two basic sub fields. One is excursive and the other one is incursive. The excursive i've named the X-gravity field factor which repels other worlds with a force of .0735 lbs/sq. in./ linear mile and establishes orbital corridors of neighboring worlds; and gravity which coalesces and unifies matter towards a concentric point from whence it radiates Matter is weightless, and gravity lends itself to it creating the illusion that matter has weight.

[UnderManiac]

@jqs1943 Wow, you have a distorted view of gravity. All matter has mass, which is measured in Kilograms. Matter bends space-time. When bunches of matter coalesce their mutual bending of space-time merge, causing the bend to be larger. The more mass matter has, the larger the bending. Gravity does not repel anything. Gravity does not attract anything. Things fall to planets, etc, because they're following the curve of space-time around the mass.

[nickharvey7]

@jqs1943 Only energy is transferred by electromagnetic waves in this theory. Put very simply the inward absorption and outward emission of light or EMR forms what we see and feel in our everyday life as the flow or passage of time

[tripwired80]

Its not hard to put 2 and 2 together if ur reading the work of the greatest minds of the day, I'd love to work at the patent office, specially back then.Ein. said that mass caused space to curve, tesla just quoted that he didnt see it possibe ( cause and effect) if mass curved space then space would straighten back out.Majority of enginers tell u still today wireless and scalar dont exist, yet that pads out. wouldnt knockin EInstein, but damn somewhere somehow i think Tesla deserves hellalotmore

[tripwired80]

Einstein was busted for plagiarism couple times, Is it better to be in the desert and theorize about how to make ac, or to make it. to many theories have become wrote and is known improperly taught as fact.Einstein was a smart fart, Tesla knew when he talked about most his topics he theorize he created.Einsteins theory is incomplete his "wormhole" is a scalar waves.that would prove em to ot be faster, we know how fast light is, how fast isa scalar wave?? ying/yang both > N.T nvr gave his theory

[jipsom]

Wow. This is turning into an exciting forum debate. Haha :)

Both were geniuses, surely. And both deserved recognition, but unfortunately only one of them got it. And both Einstein and Tesla also believed in a world living together as one etc. etc. so maybe we should start here?

I have to say, it is disappointing to see that some people are clearly favouring physical invention over theoretical. Great thinkers are not always great tinkerers.

:)

[nickharvey7]

@jipsom Thanks for the comment! I sometimes feel that if we put the same amount of energy into trying to understand the Universe as we do disagreeing with each other we might understand what and where we are.

[tripwired80]

@jipsom Dead on the head jipsom, lol amen to the last comment, but are all great tinkerers great thinkers? I say to first get to a planet it will be traveling the curve of Einstiens space ( which is still pulsing, raidiating, straightening and starting over) like we travel our globe now by plane. Until we build a "magnifying transmitter" on earth and The "reciever on planet Zr" to take Tesla's scalar wave.anywho ima shut up now, with this, No 1theory will be whole answer itll be parts from all

[jqs1943]

@jipsom You're so right!

It' better to be thinker and a doer, than a thinker and a talker!!!

I say this although i praise Alber Einstein for his uniquely delivered reasoning about energy, mass and the speed of light.I strongly believe in the equation besides the fact that i don't about light traveling at 186,000 mile per second.

If it hadn't been for that equation i would have probably never written my theory of Sunotics and The Phantom Powers of the Universe. That equation is instrumental.

[MrGrevy]

@jipsom Tesla believed no such thing. Please stfu you uneducated weirdo.

[jipsom]

@MrGrevy

Really? I wonder, then, if he was being ironic in his paper entitled THE TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY WITHOUT WIRES AS A MEANS FOR FURTHERING PEACE, printed in the Electrical World and Engineer on January 7th, 1905 (pages 21-24). I welcome your educated views.

[MrGrevy]

@jipsom The fact that he published one paper with that title doesn't prove your claim. Nice try though. 

[jipsom]

@MrGrevy

No, but it does give an insight into an aspect of Tesla's personality that many are sadly unaware of (and one that I have researched at length). If you would like more than 'one published paper' to illustrate his altruistic nature I can recommend further reading. But I would urge you to read his personal letters in the Belgrade museum, first. You may discover a different man to the one you think you know. All the best :o)

[MrGrevy]

@jipsom I dunno it's easier to live in ignorance and just assume I know everything...So I'll probably do that.

[jipsom]

@MrGrevy

Can't argue with that :)

[jipsom]

Haha

[Zeroini]

Gravity is a little more complex then electromagnetic radiation. For example, if the sun spontaneously disappeared, the earth would immediately, without any noticeable time delay, start flying off into space long before any electromagnetic radiation (light) ever reached your eyes. Relationship between gravity and time are relative....

[nickharvey7]

@Zeroini I have read that gravitational fields work at the speed of light the same speed that electromagnetic fields work. Therefore if the sun spontaneously disappeared there would be a time delay relative to the speed of light. Newton believed it was spontaneous but we now have Einstein’s theories of relativity.

[UnderManiac]

@Zeroini No, gravity moves at the speed of light. It's not instantaneous across large distances.

[marasu66]

If Saturn would have vanished 45 years and about 4 months ago, and the gravitational waves of the disruption took their 78.1 minutes or so to reach Earth, it could have arrived in just enough time to prevent my conception, much to the world's benefit, and I wouldn't be here pondering if I were a Gemini or a Taurus.

[SuperJuiceman11]

Tesla was waybefore Einstien

[BeamSurfer]

I think This is the only video i'll accept

the other's could be true, but my main discontent is teh idea of saying that i am my own "God"

[nickharvey7]

@BeamSurfer I do not understand this comment what do you mean?

[BeamSurfer]

@nickharvey7 cause quantum physics tells us that to some extent ,we are our own gods

[nickharvey7]

@BeamSurfer Yes in the sense that we can choose when and where to collapse the wave function forming our own future. I think I see what you mean now!

[UnderManiac]

@BeamSurfer Tesla was great, but by no means did he understand gravity.

[AcePilot101]

Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity was never published.

This video has absolutely nothing to do with Tesla's theories.

[nickharvey7]

@AcePilot101 It is true Tesla’s Dynamic Theory of Gravity was never published. But this theory is based on everything I have every read on Tesla’s and others belief that gravity if formed dynamically by an exchange of particles (photons). This process forms the geometry of Einstein’s curvature of spacetime.

[LordEli]

Guys like Einstein and Edison were the pretenders to Tesla's throne, and it is a fact Tesla is the one we have to thank for the technology we have today, albeit we could been way more advanced today had we been given this technology yesterday when Tesla really intended for Humanity to have it, instead of the withholding which had been done. or rather having retards trying to figure out the things he did and put their own spin on things in their failures. Yeah Tesla was the man

[nickharvey7]

@LordEli This is true in many ways!

Thanks for commenting.

[LordEli]

@nickharvey7 It makes me sad really as I am sure it does everyone when they Learn of Tesla and who he really was. and what Einstein and Edison was. Einstein did only 1 thing which had several faults. Edison stole and assaulted Tesla's work and tried to slander and belittle him, Tesla on the other hand Created and invented many things in which all on solid grounds and ready to go as he said. Einstein and Edison are the equivalent of 2 kids sleeping in the class that Tesla is trying to teach them

[nickharvey7]

@LordEli This will be put right in time and Tesla will have his rightful place!

[Grundalizer]

@LordEli I don't see why you are bringing Einstein into this

[LordEli]

@Grundalizer Because Einstein did Nothing to deserve the credit and his name going down in history as it did. While Tesla who far surpassed Einstein got the shaft and treated like a mad scientist loon.

[mmhmmm2]

@LordEli

You should be speaking upon Thomas Edison and not Einstein, because Edison is the reason Tesla did not receive much credit, Edison worked for those who wanted to make sure 'free' energy would never surface, so in order to do so, they cut his funds and collected his work when he died.

[LordEli]

@mmhmmm2 While what you said is true, Just think Einstein as well was given far more credit than he deserved, due to science books these days tend to want to quote he more so than that which Tesla was always and obviously better than

[mmhmmm2]

@LordEli

Einstein received the credit he did because of his compassion he had towards what he did. It's not about who gets more or less, it's about the focus you put into your work which gives you the payoff, in this case, Tesla's inventions benefit mankind to this day, maybe not under his ego name, but his spirit is well within that which was invented, and to be aware of his glory is good enough for you, for you are the one who recognizes it, alongside with select others.Embrace,do not blame.

[eflwinnie]

@mmhmmm2 Yes, Einstein was not bad though and had nothing to do with Tesla.

[UnderManiac]

@LordEli First of all Einstein was a genius. Tesla was brilliant with much of what he invented, but by no means could he contend with Einstein. You give Tesla more credit than he deserves. I will admit, though, he has had some brilliant ideas.

Apologize about Einstein!

[LordEli]

@UnderManiac First of all Einstein was a fucking fraud. He evented NOTHING! He comes up with 1 hairball theory and he's a genius? You fuckers are retarded You hang that title on someone for nothing. but dissing Tesla whom is a True Genuis in every since of the word. You really need to do your Tesla research Kid's without Tesla we'd still be in the frickin living under candle light. We OWE EVERYTHING we have today Technology wise and energy Power to Tesla!

[LucasI3434]

@LordEli You should seriously consider doing the slightest bit of research before you start calling people frauds. He didn't simply "come up" with ONE "hairball theory". He unseated Newtonian Mechanics as the basis of physics while simultaneously revolutionizing the way we view time and space through his many experiments, his research, and his overall dedication.

You want a list of what he did?

[LucasI3434]

@LordEli What Einstein did.

Contributions to the Annus Mirabilis papers, a-priori physical principles, Bose-Einstein statistics, the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox, Einstein-Cartan theory, the Schrodinger Gas Model, and Entwurf theory.

Formulated and scientifically supported the theory of general relativity, special relativity, quantum theory/mechanics, worm-holes, equations of motion, wave-partical duality, zero-point energy, photons, thermodynamic fluctuations, critical opalescence, con't

[LucasI3434]

@LordEli Adiabatic principle and action-angle variables, unified field theory, the photoelectric effect, mass-energy equivalence, and helped in the Manhattan Project to name a few. He was also awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1921.

What do you have to say for yourself now?

"First of all Einstein was a fucking fraud (LIE). He evented (Evented?) NOTHING! He comes up with 1 hairball theory (LIE) and he's a genius?" He revolutionized science as we know it, so yes. For that, he is a genius.

[LordEli]

@LucasI3434 And Neither of those went anywhere did they? You see Now when we talk about Tesla work. well Fact of point is Everything he invented which his range of Inventions are right next to the 2000 mark. All worked function and still baffles the world today. And His shits still being proven Accurate and true. Einstein wasn't but a falsehood who was given the spotlight he did not deserve as was Edison

[LucasI3434]

@LordEli Are you kidding? I'm not talking of inventions. I'm talking of ideas and science that revolutionized modern day thinking. Tesla had some great inventions, i'm not going to lie, but Einstein influenced and made discoveries that completely changed physics, cosmology, astronomy, astrophysics, and science in general. Almost every theory and scientific observation Einstein made has been proven accurate, and are still upheld today in the classroom as well as the laboratory.

[MrGrevy]

@UnderManiac Umm Einstein was a plagiarist and he was wrong about a lot of things. Tesla was superior to Einstein in every way.

[UnderManlac]

@MrGrevy Wow, you sure don't know anything about science or history.

[yoda6523]

@MrGrevy I really don't think it is right to call Einstein a plagiarist. Afterall, How else dose one learn? Every word comes from people who have preceded us, as the Collective unconscious enfolds all the information received, each and every individual thought unique just as we are!, and unique as he was, even Tesla was working from Boscovich's theory!,. . . We take it all in and put it together our own way!, and as Walter Russell would say; "Just listen to your heart." (It is really no secret)

[11111111jws]

Yes but is the vernacular theory of relativity congruent to the disproportional-ism of quagmire law?

That is to say by formulating the passive force into the vector, it should be translusive to the infraction of molecules.

[Kenzofeis]

Something to think about:

If you reduce the strength of a field by 1/4 at each doubling of distance from source - how far away must you be to have 0 (zero) field strength (not considering the time factor)? ;p

[nickharvey7]

@Kenzofeis I might be wrong but is it not infinite? Because we can always continue dividing something mathematically

[tripwire80]

@nickharvey7 , nope he announced he had his "theory of relativity complete" was suppose to give it to the world i believe the week he died.more than likely he wrote it down, he documented his work later in life. Einstiens theory is incomplete. Speed of light is not the limit to how fast something can travel. Tesla stated scalar wave ions are faster than light waves, think it was ions anyway. :P Tesla knew the way it is, Einsteins way is the way they want us to believe it is.

[UnderManiac]

@tripwire80 That's where you are wrong. There has been NO tests that prove tesla's scalar waves could travel faster than the speed of light. Einstein's theory stands true even to this day. Give up your Einstein bashing!!!

[nickharvey7]

@UnderManiac I agree nothing can travel faster than light! But this video is not ‘Einstein bashing’ I believe he was correct in believing in a hidden variable that can explain the paradoxes of quantum mechanics. This is explained in my video Einstein’s Dream.

[tripwired80]

dont stand true it just stands till we prove it or not , heres a theory ,last as long as Einstiens, outer space is inner space of an ocean. I dont even know what I initially commented, but Einstein is still 2nd rate next to to tesla, maybe when we are riding his curve and his ammonium/geothermal refridgerator are in every part of everthing we do itll be his time. Toast 2 E spoke late but spoke wise, to nwtn 4 napn under the tree.to T for easin the burden of everday life in everyway he could.

[UnderManiac]

@tripwired80 Why are you trying to equate Tesla with Einstein? You have to pit Tesla with Edison and Einstein with Newton. Totally two different areas of science. Nobody will ever outdo Einstein. He was a theoretical genius. Tesla was a genius when it came to engineering things. I'm sure we have yet a lot to learn about Tesla's and his devices. However, even Tesla must obey the laws of thermodynamics.

As far as gravity goes, Einstein's theory still holds out as the best description.

[derickhaywood]

@Kenzofeis gravity and electro magnetic bosons have infinite range so you could be at the other end of the known unniverse and still feel the earths pull weak as it would be even the pull of the pen i'm holding

[UnderManiac]

@derickhaywood No, Gravity is not a force you'd feel billions of light years away. It's much more local than that. Gravity is not a force, but the bending of space time. Yes, I have studied string and M theory.

[nickharvey7]

@UnderManiac In this theory objects just free fall towards the greatest mass or energy because they have the slowest rate or flow of time. The rate that time flows around an object will be relative to the energy or mass of that object. Therefore the greater the energy or mass the greater the curvature of spacetime! 

[q7spiz]

Hmmmm......more energy field physics. Nice. I always had a feeling that Tesla was doing things with energy fields.

[lnpkural]

There is nothing about Tesla's work in this video. The title is misleading..

[nickharvey7]

@lnpkural It is not meant to be misleading, Tesla worked on a theory of gravity that used exchange forces but as far as I know it was never published. Einstein’s general relativity beautifully explains gravity in the form of geometry of curved spacetime. But does not explain how energy or mass distorts spacetime to form this curvature.

[JoneeChristy]

@lnpkural Agreed.

[Julia76087]

John, this has put the c.c. in a better light as far as understanding what they were trying to communicate to us, it's over my head somewhat but very interesting. glad i had a small part in helping to figure it out, communicating is key. i like the way that Nickharvey7 said it, "it is truly profound"

[johnscottartist]

you may find this video interesting /watch?v=lZqtcm1b7Uk

[Julia76087]

this is interesting, at 0:41 it looks like a crop circle i've seen! :)

[Cheuvin]

Some things in this video just dont make sense to me. The words symmetry/broken symmetry seem misleading. How does a symmetry simply form nonsymmetry?

Also how does this theory differ from other theories and what is so far missing from this theory that makes it unsuitable to teach in class?

[nickharvey7]

In this theory light moves in straight lines at a universal speed in a vacuum. Therefore in 3D space it will radiate out from its radius in all directions forming light spheres of EMR. Therefore we have a universal process of symmetry forming at the quantum level. This symmetry is broken by energy or mass forming Einstein’s curvature of spacetime.

[UnderManiac]

@nickharvey7 This light theory is incorrect. Light does not follow a straight line, but follows the curves in space time. It has been proven during a solar eclipse that you can see some stars that were behind the sun. Their light was bent around the sun, making them look as if they were in front. This proves Einstein's theory on gravity and light.

[nickharvey7]

@UnderManiac This theory does not disagree with Einstein’s theory on gravity (General Relativity) but unites it with quantum mechanics. Light travels in a straight line relative to the curvature of spacetime. In GR Einstein explained that objects curve spacetime relative to their energy or mass as the objects move around the curvature of spacetime also moves. This theory explains how objects actually do this!

[nickharvey7]

@Cheuvin This theory differs from other theories because it only needs 3 dimensions and one variable time. This is an Artist theory and is therefore missing the backing of the scientific community.

[bodunchar]

so is the right that there is no matter as we know it, just energy?

Theres that funny concept again again, Time. A unit of measurement. Metric units dont exist, the are just a means of measurement.

To measure something is to limit it.

Profound!

[nickharvey7]

@bodunchar It is truly profound! We have mass or matter in the form of atoms and radiant energy in the form of light or EMR. In Quantum Atom Theory time is formed be the emission and absorption of EMR or light between the atoms. This will form different ratios between objects that we can measure and the units we use will make no difference. Because we are forming our own spacetime when we measure something we limit it giving the measurement a position in space and time.

[DutchCityGirl]

you have a sweet voice . but i don't understand shit of it because my english is bad and i have to little knowledge about atoms. Thanks anyway. <3

[bosatsu76]

@DutchCityGirl Don't feel bad, English is my primary language and I still didn't understand shit of it. And further... I strongly suspect that the speaker didn't either, or he would be filthy rich from some invention or other.

[Cheuvin]

@bosatsu76 how do you figure that?

[DutchCityGirl]

@bosatsu76 Thank you :)

[nickharvey7]

Thanks no one has ever said that I have good graphics before!!

If EMR produces gravity outside of an atom do we need to find Gravitons inside of an atom? Electrostatics is subject to Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle therefore gravity is quantized in this theory. Newton said every force creates an opposite and equal force but in his day he never had Maxwells equations therefore he would not see EMR as an outward force.

[bodunchar]

@nickharvey7 cosmic law, as above so below - cause and effect.

[nickharvey7]

@bodunchar But what is cosmic law?

[nickharvey7]

Thanks for the comment!

Hopefully beauty and truth go together!

[GateMessenger]

Absolutely beautifully put together. Thanks.