I take a little bit of what Kaku say with a grain of salt. A lot of physicists like Lawrence Krauss (whom I consider one of the smartest in the world) believe string theory is bogus. Kaku seems to be a good "explain-really-hard-concepts-to-dumb-people" kind of guy but not sure his theorys are sound.
Guys like Michio Kaku and Neil Degrasse Tyson should be the ones earning multi-million dollar salaries and baggin all the hot chicks, not these prima donas who play professional sports nowadays
Neutrino faster then a light.During the experiment. BUT when 10,000 light year.. both hit the earth same time. The experiment is fail. The light can travel faster depend on the what type of matter(Inside the space). E=mc2 is still in good position. The experiment 450miles is make the light slow due to the medium(space matter) The medium do not effect the neutron. The light can travel faster then any type of atom depend on the medium when it travel along in it.
Neutrino faster then a light.During the experiment. BUT when 10,000 light year.. both hit the earth same time. The experiment is fail. The light can travel faster depend on the what type of matter(Inside the space). E=mc2 is still in good position. The experiment 450miles is make the light slow due to the medium(space matter) The medium do not effect the neutron. The light can travel faster then any type of atom depend on the medium when it travel along in it.
He misspoke somewhat when characterizing the distance to Supernova 1987a. Wikipedia states that SN1987a occurred in the outskirts of the Tarantula Nebula in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a nearby dwarf galaxy. It occurred approximately 168,000 light-years,
By saying tens of thousands of light-years it gives the impression its distance is on the order of 10^4 light-years when in reality it is on the order of 10^5 light-years. Although not terribly reliant, it seemed to need clarification.
use to have respect for this guy, and his opinions, i no longer do. if relativity was proven to be incorrect physicist know that its over for them so obviously they would be quick to discredit any claim that opposed their precious laws cause even thought the pursuit of physicist and scientist is the hunt for truth there are certain truths they do not want uncovered until the time is right for them this guy just didnt want to be out of a job with a degree in something that was 100% incorrect
@ArtworkbyMosier over for them what?? the ppl i am in touch with were super excited by this, yes im talking bout physicists. either u r a religious nut or controversy theorist. get a life.
@chinamanspeakenlis you dont have the IQ or knowledge of its latterial implications to the science behind it, or you would not have ask a question like "what?" so therefore you lack the level of intelligence required to understand my statement, as you confused it with religion, or me being some kind of controversy theorist LOL. read the books get the education and you will understand my statement more clearer, but i cannot make you understand 12 grade math if you are still in kindergarten
Science is still in it's infancy. Here is a blow to it's infantile sense of omnipotence. Since it is not God, it has no buisness trashing the planet in the quest for glory. More humility would do us all a world of good.
@chinamanspeakenlis Truth hurts so you strike back in anger, like the slave to your limbic system that youa are. LOL. Notice the primitive words and primitive emotions commicated in your hostile response. Hssssss!
When man admits he is the error, and that he has the ability to be wrong, is when everything starts to come together and greater heights can be reached.
Of course Einstein could be wrong. It is not as if all the physicists decided to say "oh that can't be right because it goes against Einstein!" NO! They carefully looked at the experiment which contradicts years of scientific data and began to hypothesize as to why this might be. Please don't begin to think physicists are biased.
Now tell me,is there a community on youtube whose job is to dislike every video no matter how brilliant it is? Serioisly, i find no reason behind anyone disliking it!
Oh FFS, the results were not WRONG. They were POSSIBLY wrong due to two POSSIBLE sources of error: The GPS calibration and the fiber optic cable. They are going to fix these two sources of error and retest in MAY. We will know in MAY whether or not they were wrong. Until then, anything said is merely conjecture.
Esinstein himself would despise the dogma that has built up around his name. It's as if it is noteven possible he was wrong. He was only a human, why couldn't he be wrong? Science is getting more and more fascist every day.
There was a loose atomic cable in CERNS experiment. There results where wrong. Thumbs me up so people can see! (It wont let me link the article, but u can still google it)
@LuisReefTank Those people at CERN are as stupid as the physicists in the early 1900's who released to the world that they created Nuclear Fusion in there lab before checking if something went wrong OR comparing the results with others. Then they looked like fools to the public. That is exactly what CERN did....they get all cocky and tell these results to the media before checking there equipment or other scientists. They must have forgotten the basic law of communicating scientific results.
for us to go faster than the speed of light can unorder every relative interaction because life itself isn't designed to go faster than the speed of light
if jesus were to come 2012 then he would possess power faster than the speed of light
Neutrinos accelerated from CERN were directionally "fired" over a short distance, as opposed to the wild shock wave that occurred with the supernova in question. So, in a controlled environment, we were able to accelerate a neutrino faster than light, and faster than what appears to naturally occur. So what if Einstein's theories aren't all correct? Isn't that serendipity for physicists? I mean, it's obvious to me that they're just humans at the end of the day- the best of us are wrong at times!
Every physical model is based on a set of axioms from which equations are derived to quantify and predict natural phenomena. A model is only robust so long as the assumptions hold true. Einstein's treatment of time as a 4th spatial dimension works incredibly well, but it is possible that future experiments may reveal situations where the relativistic models fall short, and new insight into the nature of time and space is needed.
They weren't trying to defeat relativity. It just happened to happen. Even though I think they may have conceded that it was an error, relativity is in danger of becoming a sacred cow in physics.
I don't agree. I have been reading Scientific American in the late 70s and there were many published reports of super-luminal galaxies. Now these are all tens to hundreds of light-years away. Some were moving apart at 10X c and there was concurrence amongst the astronomers. Now are physicists trying to ignore other scientists who said Einstein (the physicist's demi-god) was wrong ?. It seems so.
that's the way they do physics now.. they light fireworks and see what happen. didn't you ever think that someone had already figured out a long time ago ??? Oh nooo, we are the toppermost of the poppermost.
Obviously they were using Bizarro neutrinos that move faster as the material they travel through gets more dense. They inhabit the other side of the speed of light, and the mystery is how they wound up at CERN to begin with.
Actually if GPS is a relativistic device and relativity is correct, the distance should be measured correctly and thus relativity is incorrect due to the neutrino being faster than the speed of light (unless a different systematic error occured, which seems highly likely).f
wait, if they shot them through a mountain, then maybe one side of the mountain was more dense and thus caused one of the particles to slow down relative to the other?
@shytake That doesn't mean it isn't a particle, it simply means that it doesn't hardly react with anything. It does not have to interact with other matter and particles in the universe to be a particle, and in fact it does at times interact, which means that your bases for it not being a particle "that it can go through lead for 2 years without stopping, thus indicating a lack of reactions" deafeats itself, beacuse the neutrino will eventually be stopped by interacting.
Is it not possible that suggesting that travelling faster than the speed of light will allow you to go back in time is just another flaw in physics?
If time travel was possible, what about all the possible paradoxes that it could cause?
Would it mean that if you went back in time to try and prevent world war 2, you could actually end up being the person who kick starts it in the first place????
Time travel would have to create a series of impossible scenarios.
@TranceBeforeWeDie what if time travel was actually simply trans dimensional travel i would say that sort of travel may be possible if we applied holograph theory of black-holes ? maybe? who knows eh? ;)
I've often thought about this myself. Things could be changing around us all the time and we wouldn't even know it, because the history behind the change would also be altered.
Maybe Einstein where wrong too he is people you know! people make mistakes! and this what we know is build on about 200 year knowledge and study but in future all these technology's and theory's will be caveman delusions!
@Polinenko Some discoveries are forever. The periodic table, newton’s laws, e=mc^2… 1000 years from now students will still be learning these in school. That’s what makes them so cool.
@James01100011 can you truly be certain of that? Is it not possible for every experiment to have had systematic flaws which thus caused the experiment to supply false data? 1000 years from now, we might very well have found this to be the case and our view of the universe could be radically different, It is of course even possible that our very logic is flawed currently and that until it changes, we simply won't have any way to tell whether or not we were correct.
@RAYNE0912 I can’t be certain of anything but I can say with a high degree that in 1000 years we will still consider the world to be round. Something are just fundamental. Just as relativity rewrote a lot of Newtonian physics, Newton is still important. Hopefully in 1000 years they will have pealed back a few more layers of reality but that doesn’t necessarily mean past views have to be wrong, just incomplete.
I just looked up that neutrino/supernova thing and they determined a cause for the earliy arrival of the neutrinos (they were emitted first)... doesn't that make that example irrelevant?
@SalvadorBrumov You’re talking about a few hour difference between neutrinos and light with SN1987A being 168,000 light-years away. CERN was claiming like a 7km/s difference between neutrinos and light. At 168,000 light-years, 7km/s difference would have been ‘way’ more than a few hours.
@Dylanmckay71 A neutrino stream fired from one lab to another in europe that was a distance of 454 miles according to GPS. The neutrino stream beat the light beam by 60 feet even though fired at the same time. They think a systematic error explains this, although they still dont know why the light beam arrived after if both were on the way to the same target. Its a fascinating result, but as far as I know science hasnt been able to replicate it, making an error far more likely explanation.
Well I'm no physicist but I believe everything is moving at the speed of light talking the speed of an atom to the rotation of the earth to rotation of our galaxy and so on
Awww... I was all excited when it was sounding like the whole "nothing is faster than light" thing was proven wrong, but then he countered it, and now I'm disappointed. :(
Well maybe the assumption that Einstein was 100% wrong is well, 100% wrong. Could it be possible that Einstein's theory was indeed correct but incorrect at the same time? Could there be others means of discovering what Einstein had? Agh so much questioning!
I don't really like that argument he uses at the end of this video. He said the same thing at some conference too. If they used relativity to disprove itself that means there is a problem with relativity. I guess it can't be completely wrong... but it can't be completely right... Um...
Well... relativity maybe is relative, you just have to have the right conditions for it to be true.
It's very unlikely that every formulas we know have all the variables necessary to be true all the time. I think that Einstein knew that when at the end of life he didn't publish all of his work, that was probably in contraction from his early ones. But physics is just so complex that there will a be point where something new will contradict of an "old" one. At least he made some breakthroughs
your obsession with Einstein has blinded you from noticing that he is wrong. first of all the Einstein is wrong for assuming light was the speed limit when the universe it self is speeding faster. Now his theory has been broken by the speed of the neutrinos and you cant admit it. if there is an error in the GPS system miscalculating the speed of the neutrinos, then if the experiment is repeated using a beam instead of neutrinos, then the gps should go wrong & the beam will be 6km longer.
You make it sound so dramatic. Physicists have to completely understand how something is working in order for it to be accepted. Please, present YOUR research on the matter.
@cirelancaster Your point is non sensical because you imagine a race it's like imagining ur a marathon runner and race a fictional race then tell people who don't race it crazy for not being in the marathon
Science isn't an exact science. It's the best guess we have for the workings of the universe. So does it really matter if Einstein was wrong? Think of Newton, he thought he had the universe all figured out, but oops his laws didn't seem to work. So is Einstein wrong? Probably, but hey the universe still works, and we'll keep guessing why. Some things are just beyond the scope of the human mind.
WHOOOOO HOOO!!! IM DANCING!! we knew this already but i love hearing this.. wish i would have been in school or atealt in contact with people in this field... any one want to take me under their wing?!!!! iam in!
Using the oscillators and changing length of the Wave, analyzing analyzingTesla was able to beam electrons from infinite speed down to speed of light. This is well known fact. Also when Tesla did discover anti gravity waves, after analyzing them he found that thay move 64 times faster than speed of light. What is Einsteins discovery? Confusion in the Physic.
Wrooooong Michio! You got to go in the school to reeducate yourself. Time does not play with speed of light. Michio, read Tesla. Professors are parrots, they are not discoverers like Tesla.
I knew it! I always know that the c is not a constant! I always tell people that it is not a constant and people tell me that I'm wrong! O man, I knew it years ago without any concrete proof, not with an intuition but through some crazy method :D!
The speed of light is not the ultimate speed limit. All speeds are relative, so that your speed relative to one object is entirely different relative to another object. Say we discovered a rogue planet approaching our Solar System doing 75% the speed of light. NASA sends a spaceship to land on the planet. What is its speed then?
@SuperMagnetizer or if you have two beams of light traveling in opposite directions the speed at which they are moving from each other is twice the speed of light.
@derWolfemann Yes, but the universe is ever expanding in all directions at once. The further something is from something else, the faster it is moving. So the speed of two photons moving away from each other would not be constant, it would gradually increase.
The "expansion" you're talking about only applies to the space between galaxies. Photons within a galaxy are not effected by the expansion of the universe.
why do people say time goes backwards when you travel faster than light? isnt it just an illusion of going backwards because of the light you would see reaching your eyes in reverse order? someone with physics brain please elaborate? me no get? relativimaty?
@dyingtolive123 Consider the first 3 dimensions. I can go up or down, left or right, in or out. But time seems to be special, why can I only go one direction in the 4th dimension? Shouldn't there be a way to reverse it?
@Kalohuxify hey, I'm Christian too but come on man, just because people aren't talking about spirituality doesn't mean they're wrong, now i realize that by trying to gain knowledge they turn themselves into fools, but that still doesn't mean they're all wrong, they're right about a lot of things, but I do agree with you though, Jesus is very right
Why the fuck do we have so many religious nuts on here??
I remember I have some quite big debates with friends who are Waterloo professors/researchers on this topic when we saw the news on National Geographic. Personally I stand on neutral ground because there are too many questions I haven't been able to answer to myself on Einstein's general relativity and I still can't trust the newly discovery on neutrino.
Science is NEVER about religion. If science just so happens to make a discovery that directly contradicts your religious beliefs, that does not mean science is "about religion". Are you mentally handicapped?
Sorry to say this, but there are WAY too many "religious" people claiming they're scientists. They speak of what they do not know, and think they sound clever. Michio is one of them.
What if Einstein was right to a certain extent, but there was more to it?
ReallyBadService 2 minutes ago
I take a little bit of what Kaku say with a grain of salt. A lot of physicists like Lawrence Krauss (whom I consider one of the smartest in the world) believe string theory is bogus. Kaku seems to be a good "explain-really-hard-concepts-to-dumb-people" kind of guy but not sure his theorys are sound.
authorityblues 1 hour ago
Thumbs up if you started worrying that your coffee will turn to stone in your mug, half way through this video...
Thanks for the brain meltdown, Dr Kaku...
ChainReaction666 4 hours ago
I am really gonna expect this guy to admit relativity is WRONG?? I don't think so...
JayZH1622 8 hours ago
Actually time does not truly exist.
Blasthood 10 hours ago
I hate physics...but this guy makes is so much more interesting
TheReticalz 19 hours ago
Aww man, it would be awesome if he was wrong
deadkip 20 hours ago
Imagine him bald... TA-DA Asain Lex Luther from superman!
6DanielZXC 21 hours ago
So the moral of this story boys and girls...DON'T FUCK WITH EINSTEIN!
ModaserA 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Time can not go backwards, no matter how fast you travel. I'm no expert but I am pretty sure that things can not just start rewinding like a film.
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 day ago
Guys like Michio Kaku and Neil Degrasse Tyson should be the ones earning multi-million dollar salaries and baggin all the hot chicks, not these prima donas who play professional sports nowadays
dApOnTe145 1 day ago 9
Well.... Looks like Einstein was right. But seriously, did we ever really doubt him?
CNTRI715 2 days ago
Then Einstein would not be right..
aonutube 2 days ago
Comment removed
aonutube 2 days ago
It was a loose cable. Came out in the news
prishc206 2 days ago
PRO NWO ASSIAN FAGG
Icn1337 2 days ago
Why would you recalibrate Nuclear weapons ?
Elementorum 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Neutrino faster then a light.During the experiment. BUT when 10,000 light year.. both hit the earth same time. The experiment is fail. The light can travel faster depend on the what type of matter(Inside the space). E=mc2 is still in good position. The experiment 450miles is make the light slow due to the medium(space matter) The medium do not effect the neutron. The light can travel faster then any type of atom depend on the medium when it travel along in it.
alexmaria188 2 days ago
Neutrino faster then a light.During the experiment. BUT when 10,000 light year.. both hit the earth same time. The experiment is fail. The light can travel faster depend on the what type of matter(Inside the space). E=mc2 is still in good position. The experiment 450miles is make the light slow due to the medium(space matter) The medium do not effect the neutron. The light can travel faster then any type of atom depend on the medium when it travel along in it.
alexmaria188 2 days ago
Holy shit.
Azkamina 2 days ago
He misspoke somewhat when characterizing the distance to Supernova 1987a. Wikipedia states that SN1987a occurred in the outskirts of the Tarantula Nebula in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a nearby dwarf galaxy. It occurred approximately 168,000 light-years,
By saying tens of thousands of light-years it gives the impression its distance is on the order of 10^4 light-years when in reality it is on the order of 10^5 light-years. Although not terribly reliant, it seemed to need clarification.
subsystems 3 days ago
use to have respect for this guy, and his opinions, i no longer do. if relativity was proven to be incorrect physicist know that its over for them so obviously they would be quick to discredit any claim that opposed their precious laws cause even thought the pursuit of physicist and scientist is the hunt for truth there are certain truths they do not want uncovered until the time is right for them this guy just didnt want to be out of a job with a degree in something that was 100% incorrect
ArtworkbyMosier 3 days ago
@ArtworkbyMosier over for them what?? the ppl i am in touch with were super excited by this, yes im talking bout physicists. either u r a religious nut or controversy theorist. get a life.
chinamanspeakenlis 2 days ago
@chinamanspeakenlis you dont have the IQ or knowledge of its latterial implications to the science behind it, or you would not have ask a question like "what?" so therefore you lack the level of intelligence required to understand my statement, as you confused it with religion, or me being some kind of controversy theorist LOL. read the books get the education and you will understand my statement more clearer, but i cannot make you understand 12 grade math if you are still in kindergarten
ArtworkbyMosier 2 days ago
Science is still in it's infancy. Here is a blow to it's infantile sense of omnipotence. Since it is not God, it has no buisness trashing the planet in the quest for glory. More humility would do us all a world of good.
lessermystery 3 days ago
@lessermystery wtf r u blabbering???
chinamanspeakenlis 2 days ago
@chinamanspeakenlis Truth hurts so you strike back in anger, like the slave to your limbic system that youa are. LOL. Notice the primitive words and primitive emotions commicated in your hostile response. Hssssss!
lessermystery 2 days ago
When man admits he is the error, and that he has the ability to be wrong, is when everything starts to come together and greater heights can be reached.
TheKirbyfury 3 days ago 2
@TheKirbyfury that's science my friend. self correcting. that's why we have reached such heights in such short time.
chinamanspeakenlis 2 days ago
Comment removed
jaex67 3 days ago
Of course Einstein could be wrong. It is not as if all the physicists decided to say "oh that can't be right because it goes against Einstein!" NO! They carefully looked at the experiment which contradicts years of scientific data and began to hypothesize as to why this might be. Please don't begin to think physicists are biased.
FR3AKinEviL 3 days ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Now tell me,is there a community on youtube whose job is to dislike every video no matter how brilliant it is? Serioisly, i find no reason behind anyone disliking it!
dkoolscorpionx 4 days ago
Oh FFS, the results were not WRONG. They were POSSIBLY wrong due to two POSSIBLE sources of error: The GPS calibration and the fiber optic cable. They are going to fix these two sources of error and retest in MAY. We will know in MAY whether or not they were wrong. Until then, anything said is merely conjecture.
Lawyer666 4 days ago
@Lawyer666 Lol Your name fits you because you act like a lawyer. Idk about the 666 tho. I mean you don't seem very evil. Then again, neither do I XD
FR3AKinEviL 3 days ago
@Lawyer666 it's gonna take them 4 months to fix a cable?
FireWaterGasoline 3 days ago
@Lawyer666 well, ok, three and a half.
FireWaterGasoline 3 days ago
Esinstein himself would despise the dogma that has built up around his name. It's as if it is noteven possible he was wrong. He was only a human, why couldn't he be wrong? Science is getting more and more fascist every day.
dragmio 4 days ago
@dragmio That awkward momento when Einstein was not wrong.
chorinator 4 days ago 3
Holy Sh** thats scary
jaysoncainepizzatime 5 days ago
He said Heart Attack, I heard Hard On.
wosh11 5 days ago
There was a loose atomic cable in CERNS experiment. There results where wrong. Thumbs me up so people can see! (It wont let me link the article, but u can still google it)
Singetally 6 days ago 68
@Singetally it said a loose cable MAY be behind the result, not that it was.
LuisReefTank 2 days ago
@LuisReefTank There is a more recent one I read and they are sure that the atomic cable was the problem...they made it official actually...
Singetally 2 days ago
@LuisReefTank Those people at CERN are as stupid as the physicists in the early 1900's who released to the world that they created Nuclear Fusion in there lab before checking if something went wrong OR comparing the results with others. Then they looked like fools to the public. That is exactly what CERN did....they get all cocky and tell these results to the media before checking there equipment or other scientists. They must have forgotten the basic law of communicating scientific results.
Singetally 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Singetally I believe the results were leaked, and they also spent a long time checking things before leak, so you are wrong.
oBLACKIECHANoo 1 day ago
@Singetally It was a fiber optic cable, and they haven't confirmed if that was at fault or not.
Kecidek 19 minutes ago
Comment removed
Singetally 6 days ago
for us to go faster than the speed of light can unorder every relative interaction because life itself isn't designed to go faster than the speed of light
if jesus were to come 2012 then he would possess power faster than the speed of light
AntDX316 1 week ago
einstin never said that light is the fastest traveling thing. he indicated that its the fastest thing known to man.
jpawhees 1 week ago
Neutrinos accelerated from CERN were directionally "fired" over a short distance, as opposed to the wild shock wave that occurred with the supernova in question. So, in a controlled environment, we were able to accelerate a neutrino faster than light, and faster than what appears to naturally occur. So what if Einstein's theories aren't all correct? Isn't that serendipity for physicists? I mean, it's obvious to me that they're just humans at the end of the day- the best of us are wrong at times!
benskin79 1 week ago
Every physical model is based on a set of axioms from which equations are derived to quantify and predict natural phenomena. A model is only robust so long as the assumptions hold true. Einstein's treatment of time as a 4th spatial dimension works incredibly well, but it is possible that future experiments may reveal situations where the relativistic models fall short, and new insight into the nature of time and space is needed.
MetalMilitia5488 1 week ago
einstein was wrong?!?!? MY TURN
stengraf 1 week ago
They weren't trying to defeat relativity. It just happened to happen. Even though I think they may have conceded that it was an error, relativity is in danger of becoming a sacred cow in physics.
khazal12 1 week ago
I don't agree. I have been reading Scientific American in the late 70s and there were many published reports of super-luminal galaxies. Now these are all tens to hundreds of light-years away. Some were moving apart at 10X c and there was concurrence amongst the astronomers. Now are physicists trying to ignore other scientists who said Einstein (the physicist's demi-god) was wrong ?. It seems so.
fteoOpty64 1 week ago
So... my GPS no longer works?!?
kurdtpage 1 week ago
@kurdtpage i didn't say anything like that.
I just said that not only i like and play games but i also make some.
Which is funny because you think people like that are idiots
LethalAxis 1 week ago
@LethalAxis My comment wasnt directed at you, my comment was directed at Mr Kaku lol. And I'm a gamer like you, so I dont think you're an idiot.
kurdtpage 1 week ago
I just love this guy
gusbakker 1 week ago
that's the way they do physics now.. they light fireworks and see what happen. didn't you ever think that someone had already figured out a long time ago ??? Oh nooo, we are the toppermost of the poppermost.
slamblambacid 1 week ago
This dude is a theoretical physicist only in the sense that theoretically, he's a physicist.
Carl Sagan, he ain't.
miketv 1 week ago
EPIC tie.
NottheAxis 1 week ago
Obviously they were using Bizarro neutrinos that move faster as the material they travel through gets more dense. They inhabit the other side of the speed of light, and the mystery is how they wound up at CERN to begin with.
DamnedEyez 1 week ago
This is why I love science, nothing is set in stone. Everything can be challenge as new evidence comes up.
nahhty 1 week ago
we could possibly go to the past
doubleT684 1 week ago
*Throws out schematics of time machine constructed of plywood and beer cans*
..it was ecofriendly too ;-;
pman123 1 week ago 64
@pman123 Haha cute ^o^!
MegaBanne 1 day ago
Obviously CERN was wrong
The media just wanted a good story
bluewhale18 1 week ago
Actually if GPS is a relativistic device and relativity is correct, the distance should be measured correctly and thus relativity is incorrect due to the neutrino being faster than the speed of light (unless a different systematic error occured, which seems highly likely).f
glassLGT 1 week ago
Thanks Michio Kaku!
JjjeeesssBbb 1 week ago
hey! hey! Einstein is probably not wrong , and Opera had made an error , because of some technical problems .
MickeyMousesecret 1 week ago
I had to think extra hard while listening to his explanations. But to him its like saying the ABC's..
raidacaipo 1 week ago
LATEST NEWS: THEY REALLY DID GOOFED!
eran388 1 week ago
oh darn! i forget to put my brain in my head this morning....!
easyletgo 1 week ago
arstechnica (dot) com/science/news/2012/02/faster-than-light-neutrino-result-apparently-a-mistake-due-to-loose-cable (dot) ars
they just realized that their calibrations were off :p
DarkSpartan343 1 week ago
wait, if they shot them through a mountain, then maybe one side of the mountain was more dense and thus caused one of the particles to slow down relative to the other?
MikeFromSF 1 week ago
@MikeFromSF a neutrino isnt really a particle. it can go through lead for 2 years without stopping
shytake 1 week ago
@shytake That doesn't mean it isn't a particle, it simply means that it doesn't hardly react with anything. It does not have to interact with other matter and particles in the universe to be a particle, and in fact it does at times interact, which means that your bases for it not being a particle "that it can go through lead for 2 years without stopping, thus indicating a lack of reactions" deafeats itself, beacuse the neutrino will eventually be stopped by interacting.
RAYNE0912 1 week ago
Oh man, Dr. Kaku did it again!
DemocraticOrder 1 week ago
It sounds like the opposite is possible as well; given the indoor out door reasoning?
kingdic333 1 week ago
/watch?v=Q7McGUXFgJM
Einstien is wrong, this proves it.
Driku12 1 week ago
Is it not possible that suggesting that travelling faster than the speed of light will allow you to go back in time is just another flaw in physics?
If time travel was possible, what about all the possible paradoxes that it could cause?
Would it mean that if you went back in time to try and prevent world war 2, you could actually end up being the person who kick starts it in the first place????
Time travel would have to create a series of impossible scenarios.
TranceBeforeWeDie 1 week ago
@TranceBeforeWeDie what if time travel was actually simply trans dimensional travel i would say that sort of travel may be possible if we applied holograph theory of black-holes ? maybe? who knows eh? ;)
kingdic333 1 week ago
@TranceBeforeWeDie maybe the past has been altered several times but we aren't able to tell...
brenoakiy 1 week ago
@brenoakiy
(:
I've often thought about this myself. Things could be changing around us all the time and we wouldn't even know it, because the history behind the change would also be altered.
TranceBeforeWeDie 6 days ago
@TranceBeforeWeDie exactly
you could go on and come up with crazy conspiracy theories about some historical events!
btw, are you interested in animes?
there's this one called Steins;Gate which involves some of these time travel concepts...
brenoakiy 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Michio Kaku is my favorite physicist in the world! It's not many peoples who are smarter than him!
Michio is one of my heros.
SoGreatToHaveFun 1 week ago
Maybe Einstein where wrong too he is people you know! people make mistakes! and this what we know is build on about 200 year knowledge and study but in future all these technology's and theory's will be caveman delusions!
Polinenko 1 week ago
@Polinenko Some discoveries are forever. The periodic table, newton’s laws, e=mc^2… 1000 years from now students will still be learning these in school. That’s what makes them so cool.
James01100011 1 week ago
@James01100011 can you truly be certain of that? Is it not possible for every experiment to have had systematic flaws which thus caused the experiment to supply false data? 1000 years from now, we might very well have found this to be the case and our view of the universe could be radically different, It is of course even possible that our very logic is flawed currently and that until it changes, we simply won't have any way to tell whether or not we were correct.
RAYNE0912 1 week ago
@RAYNE0912 I can’t be certain of anything but I can say with a high degree that in 1000 years we will still consider the world to be round. Something are just fundamental. Just as relativity rewrote a lot of Newtonian physics, Newton is still important. Hopefully in 1000 years they will have pealed back a few more layers of reality but that doesn’t necessarily mean past views have to be wrong, just incomplete.
James01100011 1 week ago
Einstein approves this
MrIaMina 1 week ago
Michio Kaku WINS!
EugeneMarks 1 week ago
Comment removed
TheBebelehaut 1 week ago
I just looked up that neutrino/supernova thing and they determined a cause for the earliy arrival of the neutrinos (they were emitted first)... doesn't that make that example irrelevant?
SalvadorBrumov 1 week ago
@SalvadorBrumov You’re talking about a few hour difference between neutrinos and light with SN1987A being 168,000 light-years away. CERN was claiming like a 7km/s difference between neutrinos and light. At 168,000 light-years, 7km/s difference would have been ‘way’ more than a few hours.
James01100011 1 week ago
@Keith no I believe he states if Einstein is wrong time travel is possible =o
KrimeMater 1 week ago
If Einstein is wrong, does that mean time travel is impossible?
thekeithchannel 1 week ago
i love listening to smart people
thats why i sold my tv 2 years ago
LethalAxis 1 week ago 148
@LethalAxis And you switch to the internet...OUCHHHHHHHHHHH :)
gmaster999 1 week ago
@LethalAxis good to know you arent a gamer
BassGenocide 1 week ago
@BassGenocide heh...
im a game developer...
LethalAxis 1 week ago
@LethalAxis So...you make games...but don't play them at home? and/or play on a computer only?
BassGenocide 1 week ago
@LethalAxis DAMN RIGHT!!!!
ElHasZardo 1 week ago
@LethalAxis thats why i turned my 42'' into a computer monitor
panda0100 5 days ago
@panda0100 i tried that using my sony bravia but it wouldn't work lol
calzagheisthebest 5 days ago
@LethalAxis And YouTube is smarter?
ArtillicusII 5 days ago
@ArtillicusII youtube has exeptions but tv doesnt
LethalAxis 5 days ago
So wat was it that traveled faster than light
Dylanmckay71 1 week ago
@Dylanmckay71 A neutrino stream fired from one lab to another in europe that was a distance of 454 miles according to GPS. The neutrino stream beat the light beam by 60 feet even though fired at the same time. They think a systematic error explains this, although they still dont know why the light beam arrived after if both were on the way to the same target. Its a fascinating result, but as far as I know science hasnt been able to replicate it, making an error far more likely explanation.
shkotay 1 week ago
Well I'm no physicist but I believe everything is moving at the speed of light talking the speed of an atom to the rotation of the earth to rotation of our galaxy and so on
Food for thought
justclick29 1 week ago
16 meters, I suppose if the GPS can make a mistake so big when I'm driving... I risk my Life every day, Regards
ThePakino 1 week ago
16 mette
ThePakino 1 week ago
Awww... I was all excited when it was sounding like the whole "nothing is faster than light" thing was proven wrong, but then he countered it, and now I'm disappointed. :(
MisterZEDO 1 week ago
Well maybe the assumption that Einstein was 100% wrong is well, 100% wrong. Could it be possible that Einstein's theory was indeed correct but incorrect at the same time? Could there be others means of discovering what Einstein had? Agh so much questioning!
ReallyBadService 1 week ago
what if the neutrinos go at ligth speed, so the time go slow, so they look to us like they go faster than the ligth....
TheExyle24 1 week ago
I don't really like that argument he uses at the end of this video. He said the same thing at some conference too. If they used relativity to disprove itself that means there is a problem with relativity. I guess it can't be completely wrong... but it can't be completely right... Um...
I'm sorry, I am being distracted by breasts.
DoctorZordirz 2 weeks ago
well... how come to get away from a black hole you have to go faster than light, and there are cases of stars getting away from them...
lolman2461 2 weeks ago
Well... relativity maybe is relative, you just have to have the right conditions for it to be true.
It's very unlikely that every formulas we know have all the variables necessary to be true all the time. I think that Einstein knew that when at the end of life he didn't publish all of his work, that was probably in contraction from his early ones. But physics is just so complex that there will a be point where something new will contradict of an "old" one. At least he made some breakthroughs
Mentasys 2 weeks ago
your obsession with Einstein has blinded you from noticing that he is wrong. first of all the Einstein is wrong for assuming light was the speed limit when the universe it self is speeding faster. Now his theory has been broken by the speed of the neutrinos and you cant admit it. if there is an error in the GPS system miscalculating the speed of the neutrinos, then if the experiment is repeated using a beam instead of neutrinos, then the gps should go wrong & the beam will be 6km longer.
cenmoopie 2 weeks ago
@cenmoopie
You make it sound so dramatic. Physicists have to completely understand how something is working in order for it to be accepted. Please, present YOUR research on the matter.
DKM101 2 weeks ago
@cenmoopie the universe isn't expanding faster then the speed of light, its accelerating at the speed of light (or was)
captainsupercreeper 1 week ago
Maybe that's what deja vu is? Somebody manipulating our world constantly? >_>
ReallyBadService 2 weeks ago
he's like the David Suzuki of Science ^_^
xaoaxis 2 weeks ago
I thought there would be better comments for this vid.
edvolve 2 weeks ago 31
@edvolve did u read ALL the comments not just the ones on the first page?
nishblaze 2 weeks ago
@cirelancaster Your point is non sensical because you imagine a race it's like imagining ur a marathon runner and race a fictional race then tell people who don't race it crazy for not being in the marathon
Birdo661 2 weeks ago
Science isn't an exact science. It's the best guess we have for the workings of the universe. So does it really matter if Einstein was wrong? Think of Newton, he thought he had the universe all figured out, but oops his laws didn't seem to work. So is Einstein wrong? Probably, but hey the universe still works, and we'll keep guessing why. Some things are just beyond the scope of the human mind.
cirelancaster 2 weeks ago
as we get smarter were bond to look back on things and say they weren't correct
qazz11q 2 weeks ago
Whatever we all may think about this or that, I feel pretty awesome about being able to hear the thoughts of a personable genius :D Kaku ftw!
shkotay 2 weeks ago
WHOOOOO HOOO!!! IM DANCING!! we knew this already but i love hearing this.. wish i would have been in school or atealt in contact with people in this field... any one want to take me under their wing?!!!! iam in!
006JoeS 2 weeks ago
This is an older video. Look for the video where he sais the experiment gave wrong results and why.
Adaerus 2 weeks ago
cant we all just get along
MrRko4Life101 2 weeks ago
I wish time travel was real :(
dannyk140 2 weeks ago
Paradox.
TechnoManiac2 2 weeks ago
Always thought speeding the electron an atom could may imtergallic.travel a reality
Danedhxk 2 weeks ago
Entire modern Physic is political lie. Michio you are lost in space. New physic is coming, be careful Michio, it is coming , the truth is coming!
SMILJANable 2 weeks ago
@SMILJANable
There's not enough ridicule in the world to accurately assess your comment LOL!!!
drche420 2 weeks ago
@SMILJANable haha stupid
DelphianSociety 2 weeks ago
Using the oscillators and changing length of the Wave, analyzing analyzingTesla was able to beam electrons from infinite speed down to speed of light. This is well known fact. Also when Tesla did discover anti gravity waves, after analyzing them he found that thay move 64 times faster than speed of light. What is Einsteins discovery? Confusion in the Physic.
SMILJANable 2 weeks ago
Why would we want nuclear weapons re-calibrated?
ReamiSotsku 2 weeks ago
Wrooooong Michio! You got to go in the school to reeducate yourself. Time does not play with speed of light. Michio, read Tesla. Professors are parrots, they are not discoverers like Tesla.
SMILJANable 2 weeks ago
I knew it! I always know that the c is not a constant! I always tell people that it is not a constant and people tell me that I'm wrong! O man, I knew it years ago without any concrete proof, not with an intuition but through some crazy method :D!
hardc0r3gam3r 2 weeks ago
I like this physicist. He sticks to his love for science and doesn't shove atheism propaganda up peoples asses
JN5B11 2 weeks ago
The speed of light is not the ultimate speed limit. All speeds are relative, so that your speed relative to one object is entirely different relative to another object. Say we discovered a rogue planet approaching our Solar System doing 75% the speed of light. NASA sends a spaceship to land on the planet. What is its speed then?
SuperMagnetizer 2 weeks ago
@SuperMagnetizer or if you have two beams of light traveling in opposite directions the speed at which they are moving from each other is twice the speed of light.
derWolfemann 2 weeks ago
@derWolfemann Yes, but the universe is ever expanding in all directions at once. The further something is from something else, the faster it is moving. So the speed of two photons moving away from each other would not be constant, it would gradually increase.
StereoFlange 2 weeks ago
@StereoFlange
The "expansion" you're talking about only applies to the space between galaxies. Photons within a galaxy are not effected by the expansion of the universe.
drche420 2 weeks ago
It's not that Einstein was the most intelligent person, but is one of those who managed to get their thought out on a paper and explained with words.
erikjb12 2 weeks ago
Einstien wasn't wrong ; he just got only part of the cosmic big picture ?.
vladdrac88 2 weeks ago
After listening to this, I wish I had studied Science in High School and University lol
toseeornot2see 2 weeks ago
Prove theirs a "God"...
DeadManHax 2 weeks ago
why do people say time goes backwards when you travel faster than light? isnt it just an illusion of going backwards because of the light you would see reaching your eyes in reverse order? someone with physics brain please elaborate? me no get? relativimaty?
dyingtolive123 2 weeks ago
@dyingtolive123 Consider the first 3 dimensions. I can go up or down, left or right, in or out. But time seems to be special, why can I only go one direction in the 4th dimension? Shouldn't there be a way to reverse it?
cirelancaster 2 weeks ago
Mind...blown
DjFuNkFlaVa 2 weeks ago
And I need to re-calibrate my Lightsaber.
Prof. Michio Kaku, you're soooo d-mn SMART.
FukutenshiYoufan 2 weeks ago
Nikola Tesla proved that Einsteins theory is wrong...
87sinke 2 weeks ago
I want to be fizz - a - zzz
bolozbolozboloz 2 weeks ago
Michio i love your explanation. And of course you are so cute too.
veronicats100 2 weeks ago
FUCK BEAR GRYLLS!!!!!
TheLockon00 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
shefik12345 2 weeks ago
I've watched too much. My life is worthless. *goes to the nearest bridge*
KGBJACKAL 2 weeks ago
OH NO WE HAVE TO RE CALIBRATE BUZZ LIGHTYEARS NAME!!!!!!!
fvJosh 2 weeks ago
YOU ARE ALL WRONG! ONLY JESUS IS RIGHT!
Kalohuxify 2 weeks ago
@Kalohuxify I HOPE UR JOKING
fvJosh 2 weeks ago
@Kalohuxify hey, I'm Christian too but come on man, just because people aren't talking about spirituality doesn't mean they're wrong, now i realize that by trying to gain knowledge they turn themselves into fools, but that still doesn't mean they're all wrong, they're right about a lot of things, but I do agree with you though, Jesus is very right
carkorot 2 weeks ago in playlist Liked videos
Why the fuck do we have so many religious nuts on here??
I remember I have some quite big debates with friends who are Waterloo professors/researchers on this topic when we saw the news on National Geographic. Personally I stand on neutral ground because there are too many questions I haven't been able to answer to myself on Einstein's general relativity and I still can't trust the newly discovery on neutrino.
binbashLinuxAhole 2 weeks ago 11
@binbashLinuxAhole
...because science is often about religion. And people like Michio is a great example on someone preaching the 'wrong gospel'.
Satisfied with my answer ?
68HC060 2 weeks ago
@68HC060
"because science is often about religion"
Science is NEVER about religion. If science just so happens to make a discovery that directly contradicts your religious beliefs, that does not mean science is "about religion". Are you mentally handicapped?
drche420 2 weeks ago
@drche420
Sorry to say this, but there are WAY too many "religious" people claiming they're scientists. They speak of what they do not know, and think they sound clever. Michio is one of them.
68HC060 2 weeks ago
@68HC060
Michio has never claimed to be a theist, though he may be a diest. Also, what does that have to do with my comment?
drche420 2 weeks ago
@drche420 FYI: I didn't reply to your comment, I replied to binbashLinuxAhole.
68HC060 2 weeks ago