You cannot displace time unless you displace space. If you go back one hour in time, you will live out the last of your short life gasping for air seeing earth an hour away from you.
its funny but why would you return with no clothes??? whats the point of that? the audience wants questions answered not have to be made up. you should know that being a filmmaker like me!!! but it was funny
Of course, if he was never born, then he would have never traveled back in time and killed his great-grandpa, so he would have been born and killed him.....
But I love how he appeared inside the guy's body. That was great.
Very funny. Esp on warren's return covered in blood, whimpering. hehe.
Okay, now since we don't know great grandpa's actual fate, isn't it entirely possible that this is how he died the first time? And that being the case, wouldn't he have already sired all the offspring necessary to bring about warren's existence?
Also, could just have been a great grandad from an alternate timeline and Warren would just wink out of existence there and not here in the kitchen with Emily. :=)
Alternate timelines sound good on paper. But I think they're kind of a cop-out when it comes to a time travel story. There'd be no danger to time traveling. And where's the fun in that? Bettter to just revel in the paradox.
Personally, I like the idea of time/natural forces having to catch up only once a truth is pointed out - a la wile e. coyote running off the cliff and only falling once he stops to look down.
No, i think technically, the time traveler would just never have been born. he'd just never exist. there wouldn't be a disappearing scene much less a chance to discuss the issue... except for the sake of cinematic liberties (nervous laugh).
So, if he was never born, then he would never have been able to kill his great-grandpa, right? Do the laws of causation only start working once someone remembers them?
He could have blown up inside of his grandfather after his dad was born.
ILikeWeirdStuff 2 years ago
tell that dumb bitch to shut up.
pauljames00 4 years ago
hah that was great
ironlung2004 4 years ago
First!
roidroid 4 years ago
First!
CasimirN 4 years ago
You cannot displace time unless you displace space. If you go back one hour in time, you will live out the last of your short life gasping for air seeing earth an hour away from you.
supressorgrid 4 years ago
His really funny!
janexsxhot 4 years ago
Nasty body.
toobusytothinkaname 4 years ago
its funny but why would you return with no clothes??? whats the point of that? the audience wants questions answered not have to be made up. you should know that being a filmmaker like me!!! but it was funny
aliandro18 4 years ago
shut up
ironlung2004 4 years ago 3
Haha that was really cool
Shaara86 4 years ago
Omg u weren't fist to post on your own vid >.>'
Gameplayery 4 years ago
Oh my god. Hilarious. Nice work Cas.
savageian 5 years ago
lol
lilithslayer 5 years ago
She's right: future is more interesting :'p
Pretty good video and defeninitely fun (I love Emily questionning)
PaulArt 5 years ago
telefragged ! sweet !
necropathon 5 years ago
Yay for telefragging?
joeunrue 5 years ago
Agreed, that part was inspired.
chuckready 5 years ago
Of course, if he was never born, then he would have never traveled back in time and killed his great-grandpa, so he would have been born and killed him.....
But I love how he appeared inside the guy's body. That was great.
Spartacus007 5 years ago
Very funny. Esp on warren's return covered in blood, whimpering. hehe.
Okay, now since we don't know great grandpa's actual fate, isn't it entirely possible that this is how he died the first time? And that being the case, wouldn't he have already sired all the offspring necessary to bring about warren's existence?
Also, could just have been a great grandad from an alternate timeline and Warren would just wink out of existence there and not here in the kitchen with Emily. :=)
chuckready 5 years ago
Alternate timelines sound good on paper. But I think they're kind of a cop-out when it comes to a time travel story. There'd be no danger to time traveling. And where's the fun in that? Bettter to just revel in the paradox.
CasimirN 5 years ago
Understood. I guess I got caught up in the time travel talk. And it certainly worked for your piece.
Have you seen 'Primer'? I was reeling after that film, trying to understand all the paradoxes.
chuckready 5 years ago
Primer is great. I could not tell you exactly what happened but I think it's great. And made by like 10 people. Good shit.
CasimirN 5 years ago
Personally, I like the idea of time/natural forces having to catch up only once a truth is pointed out - a la wile e. coyote running off the cliff and only falling once he stops to look down.
No, i think technically, the time traveler would just never have been born. he'd just never exist. there wouldn't be a disappearing scene much less a chance to discuss the issue... except for the sake of cinematic liberties (nervous laugh).
CasimirN 5 years ago
Pretty good video.
So, if he was never born, then he would never have been able to kill his great-grandpa, right? Do the laws of causation only start working once someone remembers them?
Spartacus007 5 years ago