You see something you just don't understand, therefore NASA has to spend a million dollars to investigate and explain it all to you, or else they MUST be covering something up, right? pffffft
I saw Jesus' face in a cloud, therefore NASA MUST explain it otherwise it MUST be Jesus and there's a gubmint conspiracy.
It is understood that rich governments have built things on the earth to survive the impending environmental destruction that is only a question of when. Having known this they have embraced the help of off world beings to establish habitable quarters on a nearby stable planet like body. Just as on the earth,...not everyone is invited to survive. What is really important is the survival of the human animal carbon based lifeform,..we are a rare bio mass.
In one video it was left from a small crater, you locate it at first in the middle between the small and the middle sized crater at 7o'clock position from the big one. And if you blowup it moves again to a different position, it seems the man in the moon is very busy it must be some kind of mobile home.
@MultiHalfpipe For my videos I always used the same official picture that is in the video description. What other video/picture are you talking about ?
@ammaifostpeaici John Lenard Walson has found artificial structures with his telescop. None space agency (Russia, USA, Europe, Japan, India, China) was able to make (or refuse to let access) a Moon atlas as accurate as we can do for Earth for decades. The Moon, a few days travel. In 2011, 10 cm resolution images (as for KH-12) it's science fiction. The official story: the Moon is a complete desert, period. Next one. Now none remote rover or an international consortium for human missions, NOTHING
why don't they send a couple of satellites to move around the moon and scan it entirely for better quality pics, as they did with the Earth? Wouldn't this be faster than sending little buggy probes to explore the surface, probes that eventually end up stuck in some craters?
And why does NASA go so well with Never A Straight Answer?
@ammaifostpeaici What would be gained with high quality pics of moonrocks? Would it be worth the costs? "Buggyprobes" can do a lot more than just take pictures. As on Mars.
Do you even know what "NASA" means, and it's history?
This guy complains about this "anomaly" and conveniently ignores all the obvious developing artifacts on the right side of the image that would explain all the Lunar Orbiter image artifacts that one finds all over the images. Conspiracies are more fun that actual facts.
why is it that we have crystal clear images of planets and solar systems gas clouds other galaxies, gas clouds in other galaxies star nurseries.....but we can get a clear view of the G Damn MOON
Galaxies are billions of times larger than the Moon. But in those images, we can only see things thousands of light years across.
The moon is much smaller, and anything on it would be near-impossible to see from Earth. Try using a pair of binoculars to read someone's paper from across the street. From your example we should be able to see the writing clearly. But while you can see the paper, and even the WORDS, you can't make them out.
@Draknfyre really???...so how is it we have clear pics of Mars?..its in the Nieghborhood and further away than the Moon..but there again..no clear pics of the moon
There are plenty of clear pics of the Moon. You are simply asking for detail down to an inch on the surface which is impossible. We can't do that with Mars, either.
Just because YOU haven't found those pics doesn't mean they don't exist.
aminus3 .s3. amazonaws. c o m/image/g0002/u00001965/i00138247/9bf8aa13481b6d5dc4a8af3a20a35e8e_large.jpg
Remove the spaces. Looks pretty clear to me.
If you are asking for down to the inch surface detail, that is impossible from this planet. The only way we can get that with Mars is sending probes. Try asking this in reverse. Can space shuttle astronauts get that detail on Earth only a few hundreds miles up? No. So why expect something 200,000+ miles away like that?
@Draknfyre we have satellites in stationary orbit around the earth that can read a license tag on the back of an automobile through our dense and refractive atmosphere, and those letters aren't over 4-5 inches in length. Several of the spy satellites owned by various countries can actually redirect themselves on command. We could get some pictures of the obverse side of the moon that would be resolved down to objects as small as 32 inches (less than a meter) in size. My bet is they have them.
Those satellites aren't 300,000 miles from Earth. Even if a company was interested in turning them around (and exposure the fact that their spy satellite was even there, and capable of turning around) it still wouldn't be able to see the equipment on the moon.
It's easier to verify it. Find a university that does moon laser ranging experiments. Watch them. You verified them for yourself that they exist on the moon. There are 3 of them, one Russian. And robots didn't place them.
@RonBand01 Sorry, but you're wrong. Our spy satellites are not in stationary orbits (those would be 26,000 miles (42,000 kilometers) above Earth). Some are in "sun synchronous orbits", but most orbit just a few hundred miles above the surface of Earth. Even from just a few hundred miles, it is a myth that they can resolve the license plates on cars. The KH-11s were telescopes similar in size to Hubble and could resolve a spot a few inches across. Turned to the Moon, that's about 90 meters.
DON'T READ THISCAUSE IT REALLY WORKS! YOU WILL BE KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE.HOWEVER IF YOU DO NOT POST THIS COMMENT ON AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS THEN YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS.NOW YOU'VE STARTED READING THIS DON'T STOP! THIS IS SO SCARY....SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS WITHIN 143 MINUTES AND WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND YOUR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR IN BIG LETTERS ON THE SCREEN. THIS IS SO SCARY BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS!
@gsus7125 you work for nsa??? weather ballon??? you read that on your comic books you never saw one in your life and hop!! all the shit you swallow come out your mouth...plz keep your oral diarreah for you and shut up if u dont know that the best for dumb!!
Screw religious head in the sand people and other silly nartowminded people who can not handle the truth.I am born ready for disclosure and contact with the Aliens.That is my soul purpouse here on planet Earth,just to communicate with the Aliens in order to help eachother out on various issues.DISCLOSE NOW !!!
When people asked Dr. J. Allen Hynek, who was for over twenty years the Air Forces official astronomer for debunking UFOs, Where is the evidence for the existence of UFOs? he would reply, Where do you want me to send the truck? There is so much documented information that it would take a large truck to hold some of it
NASA does not have to explain anything. Accept what they say at face value. Are you such a total idiot expecting a response from them ? What they show is what they want from the Prols to justify their existence. You people decided their existence in the first place, the funding, the jobs-for-the-boys, their dynasty, YOUR taxes, blah, blah, blah ,blah. I shall stop now before they come and get me..........................In closing the best reply is to tell them to FUCK OFF. Go on,just DO IT.
the ameriqueen goverment fooled u in 1969 and repeated it in 2001. Wake up people for fucks sake. Your own sake. Do like the brits do. do not take any shit from anyone.
@lunhil12; @sk8Rhino..If you really believe in what you've said about government..then what can I say? I'm stunned..you are such patriots, unfortunately, very naive ones..))))))))))
@xxxAlethxxx. How does NASA explain it?.by ignoring you, or debunking as a HOAX just like every UFO video..They have pros for that, you know, they usually perform the tech analyzes of the material from stretching and tuning known laws of physics to represent to the public as a fake.That simple. There is nothing wrong with your video. I see through my telescope a lot of weird staff. Who's not into the astronomy wouldn't understand the differences between blurry and object. Don't mind them.
Your image has been blurred to reduce the pixellation of the original, which doesn't look like anything more than one of many defects on the film that was used for this photo. If you look at the original image, far to the right are many many defects which are obviously film issues and not objects. Really, this is nothing.
this is intriguing. i have heard stories of the moon and all the anomalies and conspiracies involved but not this type. pictures are easy to alter these days. but i am not saying that the picture is fake. it raises awareness.
Nasa analyst could not believe that they found "space forts" on the moon so they just didnt say anything. Really now, what is it with these idiotic videos all over Youtube ?
@lunhil12 your right every government agency ever has been in full disclosure to the public and has never hidden anything to keep funding or to keep people out of the know
@lunhil12 your 100 percent right every government agency ever known has never lied or with held anything from the public for their well being or "public well being" or to just keep people from asking questions they dont understand themselves, and certainly would tell the public everything that happens within their walls
@sk8Rhino Really, it's just rocks and shadows. Every nation on the planet has satellites and telescopes nowadays. If there was anything like that there we would know about it. Real scientific inquiry is far more interesting and fruitful than wishful speculation and bizarre assumptions made upon casual observations. Besides, we need more scientists.
@lunhil12 i dont deny that you are right on that account, i dont really see what these people see, in china there is a jut out of a mountain that looks like an elephant, doesnt mean shit, just like the moon is probably just a bunch of random formations, i am just saying every government agency has classified things and declassified years later that they had previously denied for whatever lame reason, so saying that nasa would not hide something is wrong but i also agree this video is speculation
This is fake, you can tell by how the white building is placed... The Satellite is facing straight down on the moon, so how can it see the 3D features of a building? It should be an eagle eye view.
@kamber56 What do you mean by 'fake' ? I didn't add anything on the picture. By the way in the pix references...
Illumination:
Sun Azimuth: 91.58°
Incident Angle: 72.06°
Emission Angle: 5.49°
Phase Angle: 77.53°
Alpha: -5.47°
Maybe that explains we can see relief. And on the main image of Crater Copernicus if the probe looks straight on the center we can see others parts of the crater with a different angle.
Actually, there is something there. But in looking at the original photo, the one I got, the pixel are too big to distinguish much more of any building. Though on the video, it seems that the pictures is clearer, I would say that, it's true, usually, statellite are taking pictures from straight down. So, normally, you wouldn't see in 3d.
Let say for now, at least, the location is good. Next step would be to get clearer photos then the one I got
The elite have been building on the moon for over 80 years.. come on.. we are just sheep and cattle to what they are keeping from us... Now they will play the alien card and fool everyone because we are so stupid
Somewhere around the beginning of the book Alien Agenda by Jim Marrs there's some really interesting stuff about the moon actually being hollow, and that it was possibly artificially made and placed in orbit around earth by other beings. If you're not familiar with this book, check it out--it's one of the better ones I've read dealing with the whole UFO/ET thing.
We studied and created Science on our own and only on our Planet Earth. There are billions of Planets and Galaxies out there that we should also know how their Science and life is being derived and created. So what are the odds that we can stumble upon "unidentified objects" in space? From what i observed in this video since Apollo mission, they perfected and mastered the technique of invisibility and cloaking that we are still blind and still working for it for more than hundred of years.
@biafran75 why keep quiet its pointless... id rather go missing for not keeping my mouth shut the just watch the world make a fool of it's self for not beliving this kinda stuff
The base indeed DOES exist!...One can clearly see the "airbrushed" towers and such..Now.These video images may not be very convincing on Utube..BUT..Ever try google moon??.Seeing is believing!..And when one can CLEARLY see giant and SMUGGED out areas..Speaks for itself!.Try it! =]
high powerred zoom on a camcord can find all kinds of stuff on the moon. After a 10 year study, The moon is covered with stuff- lights.structures of all shapes, crafts come and go. Bases and towers and large over hangs and what looks like deep zagged inverted holes that go to the core of the moon. a crystle pyrimade is in one large crater and besides all the clouds -mist puffs of white stuff..oh the list is on. What ppl think anymore doesnt really matter including me*
There are a lot of defects in the images. This imaging was done with *film* that was exposed and chemically processed in the spacecraft, so debris and chemical processing defects are all over the image. I strongly suspect that this is one, as there are many others of similar size and shape present all over the original image.
That's a question with no answer, except tawdry formulae ful of inexactitudes, still trying to boost a crippled science that has long outgrown its use.
@wfaulk1120 The moon does revolve on it's axis. Its rotational period is the same as its orbital period and this is why you only see one side of the moon from earth.
@wfaulk1120 About a 30 earth day complete rotation for our moon. The backside is in our daytime sky (backside facing us) when not visable at night. When we see it in the sky at night, the daytime side is on the other side. Hope this helps. Brian
also I don't wanna be an ass but apollowasreal answered most of your questions you just don't seem to understand that he did.
And let's be real. this reflection you show us in that vid looks nothing like a spherical shape like a dome. it doesn't look like anything and it doesn't look like a structure. I have rocks in my backyard that look more structuraly designed than what is on this picture.
@xxxAlethxxx I think it's possible that itelligent life exists somewhere else. note that there's a diffrence between aknowledging the possibility of it and being affirmative that it does exist.
If they do exist I have no idea if they ever came in our solar system. I have no idea of knowing if they do exist so how wouldI know if they came in our solar system?
as stated before I have no element that leads me to think they've been here so I don't think they built anything on the moon.
@furiousmat I could ask you the same thing as for 'ApolloWasReal' about OFFICIAL reports and declarations of militaries, witnesses on nuclear sites... Please watch the video "Disclosure Conference, National Press Club, 27 September 2010" on YT. And watch "NASA's Alien Anomalies caught on film - A compilation of stunning UFO footage from NASA's archives" (1 & 2).
Take your time, watch everything, and tell sincerely what you think about those documents for "visitors". If it's not ET what is it ?
@furiousmat By the way for "UFO footage from NASA's archives 1 & 2" I don't say EVERY samples are ETs stuff or without none explanation, but a big part of them. For example you will see footages raping clearly laws of physics, "things/objects" in Earth orbit that can not be explained by official ways. ApolloWasReal said it's bullshit or 'ice crystals', that EVERYTHING can be explained. I wish to have your opinion, sincerely. And if it's not ET it's human but there would be a problem too then.
@xxxAlethxxx yeah well I will look at those videos soon enough but here's the thing you must never forget. Before einstein published his theory of relativity no1 could explain phenomenons related to it. Before the quantum mechanic was published tons of phenomenons happened without explainations. Even today our understanding of physics is limited and the absence of explaination for the behavior of an object is not the proof that this object is itelligently controled or that it's an alien.
@furiousmat Of course actual and official science is limited and fails on several points... But please watch those 3 videos and tell me after that what's your opinion. For nuclear sites you can also read "UFOs and Nukes" by Robert Hastings... hundreds of factual elements, official testimonies by militaries (sometimes high level).
well I haven't seen anything of which you're talking about in the description. There is nothing like an "half circle shape" and certainly nothing that could be called "artificial architecture". All I see is a contrast flaw and this flaw doesn't even look like anything. It's just blurry and bright and there is nothing to see. NASA wont explain it not because they cant but because there is nothing to explain. jeez come on man get your shit together.
@furiousmat it has been proved that there are ancient glass domes on the moon, why glass?_ because when glass is on the moon it becomes 20 x stronger than steel
@MephedroneMonster Oh well of course... "it has been proven".. if it has been proven please post a link to a serious piece of documentation that proves it. Or has it been proven as in "I saw a couple of videos o fit on youtube" or "someone said it on the internet". Oh and I would also want a link to a credible piece of documentation that states that glass somehow turns 20x stronger than steel "when it's on the moon". I'm open as long as you can get me real information. post your references
@xxxAlethxxx I'm still waiting for the proof that there are glass domes.. and as for you glass resistanceit doesn't hold. Glass is superresistant when the object's just been formed but then you're right, it sustains micro damage that reduces its resistance significantly. The atmosphere isn't the only thing to cause these micro damages. Every piece of dust entering in contact with it may do it. To support that glass would be 20x resistant over a logn period of time on the moon means
@furiousmat For glass domes or glass structures on the Moon you gotta see with 'MephedroneMonster' or 'Richard C. Hoagland' I think... Or maybe with 'Vecherny Volgograd' who wrote 'Cities Found on the Moon' in russian Pravda in 2002 (translated on the web) and in this paper there is something about glass structures.
@xxxAlethxxx I think I know what you are refering to. This is about spectral analysis right? the man who deducted there must be glass domes because of light refraction and dominant red color in the background. I'm not even gonna get into describing how flawed this analysis is because it's a pain with these tiny messages but all I can tell you is that there are many things that can cause light to be refracted. and even if it was glass, nothing in this analysis supports that there would be "domes"
@xxxAlethxxx that these domes would have suffered absolutely no impact with any space particle over years. that is non-sense. and with that in mind, steel could also be significantly stronger if it didn't sustain micro damage. Every piece of material is subject to micro-damaging. And as I said, the micro-imperfection don't only happen in the making process. it also happens afterwards. to measure glass resistance without imperfection it has to be tested minutes after the piece is smelted.
@furiousmat "Glass" is maybe an expression or a shortcut for things found on the Moon which look like "glass". How could we know ET materials resistance, composition, etc...?
@xxxAlethxxx All his spectral analysis proved was that there existed a translucid material somewhere around when the picture was taken. could be anything. and to suppose that this material is ET designed is arbitrary and relies on nothing. Also supposing that they are domes is also arbitrary. nowhere on any picture is there any clear sign of a dome or of any translucid material or even a structure. since we don't even see it how is it relevent to start speculating on its shape or origin.
@furiousmat I agree... there is no "OFFICIAL PROOF" of translucid structures on the Moon. For 'domes' there's a french article published by 'Le Parisien - 24 nov. 1966' about this stuff on pictures of Lunar Orbiter 2, and high vertical pillars too. I think you can find the same informations in old US papers. The journalist in this article wrote for example that scientists said "those structures don't look like hills but like observatory domes". For images quality you already know what I think.
it's clearly a fault on the film, lots more like this on the original image, also obviously pre-digital and the grain does not match the surrounding area
All the people ther is involde in the ufo cirkus,or most of them are liers. Do remember its a way to make mony. Ufo is reel,and i hope that ufo people is not intresste in monymakers. And one thing more,the is proberly a big chans,the space is full of life.
I should have placed my comment below your quote where you indicated that you had some expertise in space travel. I just though you might have some more information on the subject than the rest of us. With respect to the moon pics, if NASA in fact airbrushes or otherwise modifies its pics then the taxpayers are wasting their money. Maybe some private venture ought to find out whats really up there and once and for all dispell any rumors. I'm on the fence with regard to the topic.
I should have placed my comment below your quote where you indicated that you had some expertise in space travel. I just though you might have some more information on the subject than the rest of us. With respect to the moon pics, if NASA in fact airbrushes or otherwise modifies its pics then the taxpayers are wasting their money. Maybe some private venture ought to find out whats really up there and once and for all dispell any rumors. I'm on the fence with regard to the topic.
@40390576 It's extremely common for conspiracy theorists and other fringe inhabitants to omit references. They don't *want* you to see them in context lest that undercut their argument.
Yes, this is a LO artifact. LO used a Polaroid-like camera system that exposed, processed and electronically scanned photographic film so it wouldn't have to be returned to earth. Electronic imaging sensors like CCDs didn't exist in the 1960s.
@ApolloWasReal LO or not it's not the only "anomaly" found on the Moon.
Maybe you never heard about the image AS17-135-20680 taken on the surface by Jack Schmitt. On the web try to find informations about this picture... and when you begin to play with light and contrast. What do "things" appearing make you think about ?
Do you pretend Edgar Mitchell (G. Cooper and many others for ETs subject) is a lier or a "conspiracy theorist" when he officially declares they were not alone on the Moon ?
@xxxAlethxxx I looked up AS17-135-20680. Hadn't seen it before for the very simple reason that it's one of three frames at the beginning of the magazine that were lightstruck as Jack Schmitt loaded and advanced it into the camera. It's astounding that anyone would actually try to read anything into it. But I guess that won't keep some people from trying.
I suppose it would spoil your fun to suggest that you look at the pictures just after this one.
I could show you 1 million images from any databases, your answer will always be the same. As STS088 STS088-724-66_3 for example, I'm sure you can find an official explanation.
And 2 questions remaining if you don't mind...
- Did you find another official picture with this specific area on the video?
- Did you watch "Disclosure Conference, National Press Club, 27 September 2010"?
@xxxAlethxxx I do not think Edgar Mitchell is a liar. His interest in paranormal phenomena like ESP is well known.
Mitchell is an astronaut and an engineer, not a scientist. I'm an engineer myself so I hate to admit it, but even some engineers fall prey to some pretty weird, unsubstantiated beliefs like the late head of the Institute for Creation Research.
Besides, you won't make your case by appealing to authority. Try the scientific method; that works better.
@ApolloWasReal He's not a 'scientist' as physicists for example but he earned a bachelor, master and doctor of science degree. Aeronautical engineering, aeronautics and astronautics, all this stuff is based on maths, not apple pies or number of hairs on B. Palin's head.
So you don't think he's a liar. He declared Shepard and him were not alone on the Moon. He also says, as G. Cooper and others, Earth is visited by ETs. Should I believe him or you? Did you go on the Moon? Are you an astronaut?
@xxxAlethxxx As I said, even highly trained engineers sometimes fall prey to bogus, even embarrassing beliefs. We can be fooled; we're all human. That's precisely why the scientific method exists. It recognizes that individual humans make mistakes, so it corrects for individual errors by requiring that work be independently reproduced, verified and documented. If this isn't done, then the results are simply not acceptable science no matter how prestigious the person providing them.
Ok so when is NASA and our "Government" going to come clean on all of this stuff and re-write the history books, that ought to keep people employed for the next thousand years
Ok so when is NASA and our "Government" going to come clean on all of this stuff and re-write the history books, that ought to keep people employed for the next thousand years.
I don't think that N.A.S.A has to explain it. We are intelligent beings who can draw conclusions for ourselves. We realize that something is going on, but we must also realize that there are some that think that we can't handle reality. We however must positon ourselves to prove them wrong.
@dingdongditcher69 me too but their is no evidence they exist. for something to exist it must have location. otherwire it is an emotion like love or hate.
TRANSLATING СФЕРА - ЭТО РАДАР ДАЛЬНЕЙ СВЯЗИ!! А ПЕРЕБОРКИ - ЭТО ТРУБЫ ТРАНСПОРТНЫХ КАНАЛОВ ОТ ЗДАНИЯ БАЗЫ!! РАЗМЕР ДАННОЙ АНОМАЛИИ ОДИН КИЛОМЕТР!!!!!!!!!!! RUS
@vitanovagypsy How do I deny such a thing? Easy. I deny it. Your claim is bullshit concocted by Bart Sibrel to hoodwink people like you into buying his DVD. If you look at the entire TV transmission, not just the parts Sibrel wants you to see, it's totally obvious that it really was taken in an Apollo CSM, with the earth going by the window.
This is simply some type of foreign artifact on the image, i.e. dust, thread, etc. Take the ORIGINAL image, NOT the one in this video, and enlarge it by either 400 or 600%. You'll clearly see how it's heavily pixelated, compared to the rest of the image. Dead giveaway that the object isn't "real", or in other words, isn't actually sitting there on the Moon. Nice try though, just a bit too much enthusiasm in trying to find something strange & not enough actual studying to identify what it is.
@offamychain In despite of the fact this "thing" is real or not, THERE ARE some artificial structures on the Moon, and not "official" ones. Take a look at the documentary "Moon Rising" for example... between others. You believe it or not I don't care, but now there is some interesting stuff, as for links or videos I quoted to 'ApolloWasReal'... and he means via his codes he doesn't really want to investigate just 5 minutes on those references. "Weather ballons" in Earth orbit seem... unusuals.
@xxxAlethxxx Sorry, but no. You can close your eyes, tap your heels three times and wish real hard, but that won't make alien artifacts appear on the moon. And by pointing to obvious Lunar Orbiter image defects and claiming that they're mysterious structures, you just make yourself look silly.
@ApolloWasReal Mmmhh ? I don't know where you take this pleasure to spend so much time on this page for a video you think it's "bullshit". Day after day, week after week, you're still there. Masochism addict ? And you refuse to look at links I posted during messages and messages. No answer from you about these references... You prefer to stay on your position : "NO ! ARTIFICIAL BUILDINGS ON THE MOON DO NOT EXIST ! THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE !" Well... with you, everything is possible.
@xxxAlethxxx Why do I come back? Good question. Maybe it's because I have a very low tolerance for bullshit. Especially obvious bullshit in a field I know something about (space flight) from people who are just too goddamned lazy to take the time to know better.
@ApolloWasReal So do you spend your entire life on videos about "alien stuff" to claim this is "bullshit" ? There are thousands on YT, a such hard work for you. If it's your hobby... You can't accept people to have doubts about NASA informations, or at least a part of them. That is your problem.
@xxxAlethxxx I fully accept that there are many crackpots like you out there who either think NASA faked the Apollo missions, or that they covered up "alien structures". Some even believe both. I know that I'll never change your mind with facts and logic when your position wasn't arrived at with facts and logic in the first place. But something has to be said for the benefit of ordinary people who come across these claims and who may not realize just how much bullshit they are.
@ApolloWasReal You repeat and repeat what you wrote in last messages. Nothing new... "It's forbidden to have doubts about NASA informations". So you will write another message to repeat "NASA never lies" or "someone must be silly to think NASA could lie". And so on... Is this a 'game' for you ? If you're looking for a sparring partner I think you're in the wrong place.
By the way it's an honor for me that you spend so much time on this video, between thousands ones more or less like this.
@xxxAlethxxx The fact that I can easily explain some or even most of the artifacts you claim are "UFOs" does not mean I have any obligation to do so. An alien structure on the moon certainly qualifies as an extraordinary claim, so the obligation is entirely yours to provide the required extraordinary evidence.
Sometimes there simply isn't enough information to determine what some particular blob may be. But that doesn't mean you get to proclaim "space aliens!" by default.
@ApolloWasReal You seem to mean that several brighting globes in Earth orbit (STS infra-red sample, end of the video), appearing one by one, placed in circle-like, are... "logical". And it's not the only one. Admit at least there's not an "official explanation" for EVERY examples. Or explain what this could be, if you really watched the whole video. Or the "black thing" follow in front of the Moon, followed by an amateur astronom. Etc etc etc... Will you reject these samples too ?
@xxxAlethxxx There are any number of possibilities for EVERY SINGLE ONE of these artifacts. Frozen water/urine dumps, loose fasteners and bits of thermal blanket are just a few. So are lens flares.
It's not for me to prove which specific artifact is in each picture, even though in many cases I can do just that. It's up to you to rule them ALL out. And you certainly haven't.
@ApolloWasReal "There are any number of possibilities for EVERY SINGLE ONE of these artifacts."
So can you explain with your science what are those brighting orbs appearing one by one on STS infra-red videos at the end of the video 'NASA's Alien Anomalies caught on film - A compilation of stunning UFO footage from NASA's archives' ? Thanx for your help...
@xxxAlethxxx "Or the "black thing" follow in front of the Moon, followed by an amateur astronom (er)"
LOL .... sounds like you've been peeking at MY images. I've been an astronomer for 3 decades, own 4 telescopes & several thousand $'s of CCD equipment, and have made several "discoveries". One of those, published to the web, was a black "worm" moving in front of the Moon. Amazing how spider silk inside the dew cap can fool even a knowledgeable astronomer.
@ApolloWasReal Maybe you can enlighten us about the issue of UFO's over Nuclear bases, the ones that were discussed in the September 2010 National Press Club video.
@katoooq1 And what does this have to do with the moon?
You don't understand how this works. One doesn't get to point to fuzzy blobs on a picture and say "these are aliens unless you can prove otherwise". If YOU make the claim then it's up to YOU to prove it.
@xxxAlethxxx "where you take this pleasure to spend so much time on this page for a video you think it's "bullshit"." There is no "PLEASURE" in what he's doing, trust me. I've been forced to do the same thing many times. You take what WE do ... true science ... and contort it into ignorant, amateurish, & worthless JUNK. And guess who gets to explain to the general public that what people like you are claiming, ISN'T what's really happening. You sure won't, so you can probably guess who does.
@offamychain For your information there are "objects" now which are official, and were categorized in files 'science fiction' a few years are. And NASA still declares this is bullshit. What are these objects ? Solid ones, detected by army, radars, it's OFFICIAL now. There are a lot of 'archives disclosure' for some years and you can't tell they don't exist. Or you pretend these military corps lie. Find 'Twelve Government Documents That Take UFOs Seriously' on OpenMinds and you'll understand...
@offamychain Yes, Lunar Orbiter was infamous for image artifacts. Until modern CCDs, high resolution photography required film, but returning it from the moon is difficult and expensive. Kodak developed a way to develop 70mm film on board so it could be scanned electronically and sent to earth. A 'bimat', a second film covered with gelatin and chemicals, was rolled against the film. Sometimes the rollers stuck or the two films didn't contact perfectly, leaving "bubbles" in the image like this.
Ah so, it came from Lunar Orbiter. They carried a film imaging system much like a Polaroid camera. The exposed film was developed on board, scanned and sent to earth. There are MANY artifacts just like this one in Lunar Orbiter pictures from sticking rollers, incomplete contact with the developer chemicals, drops of chemicals remaining on the film, etc.
Sorry, but this is not a real feature on the moon.
Apple stores have reached moon...
m4rk89 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yawazio Looks like 7/11 store.
1musicme 1 month ago
Comment removed
1musicme 1 month ago
how will humanity wake up?
yklocnykl 1 month ago
Why does NASA have to explain anything?
You see something you just don't understand, therefore NASA has to spend a million dollars to investigate and explain it all to you, or else they MUST be covering something up, right? pffffft
I saw Jesus' face in a cloud, therefore NASA MUST explain it otherwise it MUST be Jesus and there's a gubmint conspiracy.
robzed2 1 month ago
It is understood that rich governments have built things on the earth to survive the impending environmental destruction that is only a question of when. Having known this they have embraced the help of off world beings to establish habitable quarters on a nearby stable planet like body. Just as on the earth,...not everyone is invited to survive. What is really important is the survival of the human animal carbon based lifeform,..we are a rare bio mass.
urahore1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CHECK OUT MY NASA ANOMOLIES TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK. PEACE
bigbrotherwatcha 3 months ago
its awhite mark idiot
michaelberryakabez 3 months ago
What I loved most about this video is the music theme from Blade Runner :)))
CKelaiditis 3 months ago
In one video it was left from a small crater, you locate it at first in the middle between the small and the middle sized crater at 7o'clock position from the big one. And if you blowup it moves again to a different position, it seems the man in the moon is very busy it must be some kind of mobile home.
MultiHalfpipe 4 months ago
@MultiHalfpipe For my videos I always used the same official picture that is in the video description. What other video/picture are you talking about ?
xxxAlethxxx 4 months ago
do they get internet in the mental institutions these days? Seems like that :)
kokeshkokesh 4 months ago
You really think that we've only been on the moon once? I think nasas been building stuff up there
massageman09 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have a video of a glass dome as well as an alien structure. Feel free to take a look. Thanks and Peace
bigbrotherwatcha 4 months ago
wow that is stranger than fiction.
AlgisKemezys 4 months ago
Awe fuck it's my car. Dammit I'm never getting drunk again!
dundercat79 5 months ago
to be realistic here, there are backyard telescopes that could catch a very clear picture of Moon's surface, nowadays.
how could NASA hide anything?
they could only do this with the dark side of the Moon...not the one facing Earth.
ammaifostpeaici 5 months ago
@ammaifostpeaici John Lenard Walson has found artificial structures with his telescop. None space agency (Russia, USA, Europe, Japan, India, China) was able to make (or refuse to let access) a Moon atlas as accurate as we can do for Earth for decades. The Moon, a few days travel. In 2011, 10 cm resolution images (as for KH-12) it's science fiction. The official story: the Moon is a complete desert, period. Next one. Now none remote rover or an international consortium for human missions, NOTHING
xxxAlethxxx 5 months ago
*****5stars*****
lights21002003 5 months ago
POR KE KERER BER KOSAS DOND NO LAS AY
NEGRO361984 5 months ago
why don't they send a couple of satellites to move around the moon and scan it entirely for better quality pics, as they did with the Earth? Wouldn't this be faster than sending little buggy probes to explore the surface, probes that eventually end up stuck in some craters?
And why does NASA go so well with Never A Straight Answer?
ammaifostpeaici 5 months ago
@ammaifostpeaici What would be gained with high quality pics of moonrocks? Would it be worth the costs? "Buggyprobes" can do a lot more than just take pictures. As on Mars.
Do you even know what "NASA" means, and it's history?
YDDES 5 months ago
I see everything but T
soco75 5 months ago 4
could it be a STARBUCKS store? just an idea? just looked like one of their drive ins to me thats all...
weldonzerom 5 months ago 2
could it be a STARBUCKS store? just an idea?
weldonzerom 5 months ago
piss off back to mass effect
ArrowTwoOne 6 months ago
This guy complains about this "anomaly" and conveniently ignores all the obvious developing artifacts on the right side of the image that would explain all the Lunar Orbiter image artifacts that one finds all over the images. Conspiracies are more fun that actual facts.
jscotti 6 months ago 2
Is that all??? That's childs play!!! Try JAXA !!!
walitung 6 months ago
why is it that we have crystal clear images of planets and solar systems gas clouds other galaxies, gas clouds in other galaxies star nurseries.....but we can get a clear view of the G Damn MOON
offenwrong 7 months ago 2
@offenwrong
Galaxies are billions of times larger than the Moon. But in those images, we can only see things thousands of light years across.
The moon is much smaller, and anything on it would be near-impossible to see from Earth. Try using a pair of binoculars to read someone's paper from across the street. From your example we should be able to see the writing clearly. But while you can see the paper, and even the WORDS, you can't make them out.
Draknfyre 6 months ago
@Draknfyre really???...so how is it we have clear pics of Mars?..its in the Nieghborhood and further away than the Moon..but there again..no clear pics of the moon
offenwrong 6 months ago
@offenwrong
There are plenty of clear pics of the Moon. You are simply asking for detail down to an inch on the surface which is impossible. We can't do that with Mars, either.
Just because YOU haven't found those pics doesn't mean they don't exist.
Draknfyre 6 months ago
@Draknfyre BINGO...just askin to see them..never happen but it never hurts to ask.
offenwrong 6 months ago
@offenwrong
aminus3 .s3. amazonaws. c o m/image/g0002/u00001965/i00138247/9bf8aa13481b6d5dc4a8af3a20a35e8e_large.jpg
Remove the spaces. Looks pretty clear to me.
If you are asking for down to the inch surface detail, that is impossible from this planet. The only way we can get that with Mars is sending probes. Try asking this in reverse. Can space shuttle astronauts get that detail on Earth only a few hundreds miles up? No. So why expect something 200,000+ miles away like that?
Draknfyre 6 months ago
@Draknfyre we have satellites in stationary orbit around the earth that can read a license tag on the back of an automobile through our dense and refractive atmosphere, and those letters aren't over 4-5 inches in length. Several of the spy satellites owned by various countries can actually redirect themselves on command. We could get some pictures of the obverse side of the moon that would be resolved down to objects as small as 32 inches (less than a meter) in size. My bet is they have them.
RonBand01 5 months ago
@RonBand01
Those satellites aren't 300,000 miles from Earth. Even if a company was interested in turning them around (and exposure the fact that their spy satellite was even there, and capable of turning around) it still wouldn't be able to see the equipment on the moon.
It's easier to verify it. Find a university that does moon laser ranging experiments. Watch them. You verified them for yourself that they exist on the moon. There are 3 of them, one Russian. And robots didn't place them.
Draknfyre 5 months ago
@RonBand01 Sorry, but you're wrong. Our spy satellites are not in stationary orbits (those would be 26,000 miles (42,000 kilometers) above Earth). Some are in "sun synchronous orbits", but most orbit just a few hundred miles above the surface of Earth. Even from just a few hundred miles, it is a myth that they can resolve the license plates on cars. The KH-11s were telescopes similar in size to Hubble and could resolve a spot a few inches across. Turned to the Moon, that's about 90 meters.
jscotti 5 months ago
its like the time i visited the moon and painted a white mark on it
TheDubious1991 7 months ago
I don't know.......
deejayOJ 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"There are unimaginable wonders [out there], for those who
can remove some of Truth's protective layers"
-- Astronaut Neil A. Armstrong, on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Apollo 11 landing
MJ12DAVE 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DON'T READ THISCAUSE IT REALLY WORKS! YOU WILL BE KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE.HOWEVER IF YOU DO NOT POST THIS COMMENT ON AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS THEN YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS.NOW YOU'VE STARTED READING THIS DON'T STOP! THIS IS SO SCARY....SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS WITHIN 143 MINUTES AND WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND YOUR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR IN BIG LETTERS ON THE SCREEN. THIS IS SO SCARY BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS!
sacredband27 7 months ago
Its the white house, Obama is the man from the moon
minasz 7 months ago
But these space stations they look pixelated around them, is that normal?
CaptCamping 7 months ago
check this on out on google mars. This guy recently found a building or something.
71 49'19.73"N 29 33'06.53"W
vannoah 7 months ago
Clearly that is just swamp gas or a weather balloon.
gsus7125 7 months ago
@gsus7125 you work for nsa??? weather ballon??? you read that on your comic books you never saw one in your life and hop!! all the shit you swallow come out your mouth...plz keep your oral diarreah for you and shut up if u dont know that the best for dumb!!
bangkokhermetik 7 months ago
google moon is full of strange out of place looking things all over it !!
pau1hughes 8 months ago
official image...
official fake yes =__=
the hidden side of the moon that hides a lot of hidden things, the rest is bullshit, because it comes from nasa anyway.
Kikuky78 8 months ago
Hmmm, obviously marsh gas ;-p
sacallaghan 8 months ago
I suspect it's a collapsed weather balloon with a slight reflection of Venus through an atmospheric inversion layer.
coolnwynpyn1 8 months ago
Screw religious head in the sand people and other silly nartowminded people who can not handle the truth.I am born ready for disclosure and contact with the Aliens.That is my soul purpouse here on planet Earth,just to communicate with the Aliens in order to help eachother out on various issues.DISCLOSE NOW !!!
walitung 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When people asked Dr. J. Allen Hynek, who was for over twenty years the Air Forces official astronomer for debunking UFOs, Where is the evidence for the existence of UFOs? he would reply, Where do you want me to send the truck? There is so much documented information that it would take a large truck to hold some of it
MJ12DAVE 8 months ago
i work in timeshare and this is a holiday home i sold 2 barack obama a few years ago.
superfrickensexy 8 months ago
Swamp Gas
primoknoxville 8 months ago
Cool music. Vangelis is great.
FaceInTheRain 9 months ago
that's my summer home, was kinda trying to keep it a secret.. thanks YA DICK !
theBIGHOMY 9 months ago
TEEN TITANS EXCISTS!
jippiandy 9 months ago
NASA does not have to explain anything. Accept what they say at face value. Are you such a total idiot expecting a response from them ? What they show is what they want from the Prols to justify their existence. You people decided their existence in the first place, the funding, the jobs-for-the-boys, their dynasty, YOUR taxes, blah, blah, blah ,blah. I shall stop now before they come and get me..........................In closing the best reply is to tell them to FUCK OFF. Go on,just DO IT.
Chev4206 9 months ago
the ameriqueen goverment fooled u in 1969 and repeated it in 2001. Wake up people for fucks sake. Your own sake. Do like the brits do. do not take any shit from anyone.
Chev4206 10 months ago
Some Project Camelot whistle blowers have come forth with their experiences on moon bases. Scary stuff.
firesong888 10 months ago
@lunhil12; @sk8Rhino..If you really believe in what you've said about government..then what can I say? I'm stunned..you are such patriots, unfortunately, very naive ones..))))))))))
matilda20123 10 months ago
@wfaulk1120....ARTIFICIALLY
matilda20123 10 months ago
@xxxAlethxxx. How does NASA explain it?.by ignoring you, or debunking as a HOAX just like every UFO video..They have pros for that, you know, they usually perform the tech analyzes of the material from stretching and tuning known laws of physics to represent to the public as a fake.That simple. There is nothing wrong with your video. I see through my telescope a lot of weird staff. Who's not into the astronomy wouldn't understand the differences between blurry and object. Don't mind them.
matilda20123 10 months ago
Your image has been blurred to reduce the pixellation of the original, which doesn't look like anything more than one of many defects on the film that was used for this photo. If you look at the original image, far to the right are many many defects which are obviously film issues and not objects. Really, this is nothing.
AntinuclearNutrition 10 months ago
this is intriguing. i have heard stories of the moon and all the anomalies and conspiracies involved but not this type. pictures are easy to alter these days. but i am not saying that the picture is fake. it raises awareness.
karllenincbenigno 10 months ago
Nasa analyst could not believe that they found "space forts" on the moon so they just didnt say anything. Really now, what is it with these idiotic videos all over Youtube ?
lunhil12 10 months ago
@lunhil12 your right every government agency ever has been in full disclosure to the public and has never hidden anything to keep funding or to keep people out of the know
sk8Rhino 10 months ago
@lunhil12 your 100 percent right every government agency ever known has never lied or with held anything from the public for their well being or "public well being" or to just keep people from asking questions they dont understand themselves, and certainly would tell the public everything that happens within their walls
sk8Rhino 10 months ago
@sk8Rhino Really, it's just rocks and shadows. Every nation on the planet has satellites and telescopes nowadays. If there was anything like that there we would know about it. Real scientific inquiry is far more interesting and fruitful than wishful speculation and bizarre assumptions made upon casual observations. Besides, we need more scientists.
lunhil12 10 months ago
@lunhil12 i dont deny that you are right on that account, i dont really see what these people see, in china there is a jut out of a mountain that looks like an elephant, doesnt mean shit, just like the moon is probably just a bunch of random formations, i am just saying every government agency has classified things and declassified years later that they had previously denied for whatever lame reason, so saying that nasa would not hide something is wrong but i also agree this video is speculation
sk8Rhino 10 months ago
This is fake, you can tell by how the white building is placed... The Satellite is facing straight down on the moon, so how can it see the 3D features of a building? It should be an eagle eye view.
kamber56 11 months ago
@kamber56 What do you mean by 'fake' ? I didn't add anything on the picture. By the way in the pix references...
Illumination:
Sun Azimuth: 91.58°
Incident Angle: 72.06°
Emission Angle: 5.49°
Phase Angle: 77.53°
Alpha: -5.47°
Maybe that explains we can see relief. And on the main image of Crater Copernicus if the probe looks straight on the center we can see others parts of the crater with a different angle.
xxxAlethxxx 11 months ago 5
@xxxAlethxxx Good research. But try and get a life for yourself......
Chev4206 9 months ago
@xxxAlethxxx The poor deluded people always say fake when they don't understand something. The worst blind is who doen't wants to see.
asakersdecorners 9 months ago
@xxxAlethxxx ehm.. if this was real i whould not watch it right now?
T4PSC0PE 9 months ago
@kamber56
Actually, there is something there. But in looking at the original photo, the one I got, the pixel are too big to distinguish much more of any building. Though on the video, it seems that the pictures is clearer, I would say that, it's true, usually, statellite are taking pictures from straight down. So, normally, you wouldn't see in 3d.
Let say for now, at least, the location is good. Next step would be to get clearer photos then the one I got
Bye!
Marcello1b 8 months ago
@kamber56 the view is NOT birds-eye.
NotoriousDudeable 5 months ago
swamp gas! :-)
faceityafired 11 months ago
all i see is a very picselated picture what am i suposed to see ???
RedBeretXXX 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol lol lol lol lol lol lol GAY
KevinAndrews99 11 months ago
The elite have been building on the moon for over 80 years.. come on.. we are just sheep and cattle to what they are keeping from us... Now they will play the alien card and fool everyone because we are so stupid
adam3176 11 months ago
Somewhere around the beginning of the book Alien Agenda by Jim Marrs there's some really interesting stuff about the moon actually being hollow, and that it was possibly artificially made and placed in orbit around earth by other beings. If you're not familiar with this book, check it out--it's one of the better ones I've read dealing with the whole UFO/ET thing.
radioclash81 11 months ago
Could it be that the Moon is an alien craft,sitting there for thousands of years,monitoring their pet project?
damirb1 11 months ago
i think nasa has been to mars already but is keeping it a secret.but thats my veiw
warlord832 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We studied and created Science on our own and only on our Planet Earth. There are billions of Planets and Galaxies out there that we should also know how their Science and life is being derived and created. So what are the odds that we can stumble upon "unidentified objects" in space? From what i observed in this video since Apollo mission, they perfected and mastered the technique of invisibility and cloaking that we are still blind and still working for it for more than hundred of years.
pogpog28 1 year ago
@biafran75 why keep quiet its pointless... id rather go missing for not keeping my mouth shut the just watch the world make a fool of it's self for not beliving this kinda stuff
admox79gonzales 1 year ago
The base indeed DOES exist!...One can clearly see the "airbrushed" towers and such..Now.These video images may not be very convincing on Utube..BUT..Ever try google moon??.Seeing is believing!..And when one can CLEARLY see giant and SMUGGED out areas..Speaks for itself!.Try it! =]
dgenerated 1 year ago
high powerred zoom on a camcord can find all kinds of stuff on the moon. After a 10 year study, The moon is covered with stuff- lights.structures of all shapes, crafts come and go. Bases and towers and large over hangs and what looks like deep zagged inverted holes that go to the core of the moon. a crystle pyrimade is in one large crater and besides all the clouds -mist puffs of white stuff..oh the list is on. What ppl think anymore doesnt really matter including me*
Cloudy011 1 year ago
There are a lot of defects in the images. This imaging was done with *film* that was exposed and chemically processed in the spacecraft, so debris and chemical processing defects are all over the image. I strongly suspect that this is one, as there are many others of similar size and shape present all over the original image.
1sorryham 1 year ago
OH MY GOD !!! FUCKING ALIENS !
waleedgilani 1 year ago
wtf is an anomoly
jt6191000 1 year ago
@jt6191000 Something that pops up and cannot be explained
dappstarr 1 year ago
Nasa explains this by saying, go away and stop wasting our time.
fortunanike 1 year ago
is the flag still on the moon?
rickythepitbull 1 year ago
thats the same luminus subject armstrong first observer
G3TToSiCKURiTy 1 year ago
w w w.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-135-20680HR. j p g from Apollo 17
take it into photo editor and adjust image contras and brightness
haggisbasheruk 1 year ago
Entropy does not allow the moon to be in a non revolutionary orbit. How does the back side stay hidden???? Something is not right here!!!
wfaulk1120 1 year ago
@wfaulk1120 The Moon is not the only example in the Solar System....
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago 9
@wfaulk1120 You sound like a free thinker,careful,or you may go missing,the world couldn't handle the truth so just stay quiet
biafran75 1 year ago
@wfaulk1120 Your grasp of basic physics is what is not right. Tidal locking is a simple concept to grasp.
Huttate1 11 months ago
@wfaulk1120
That's a question with no answer, except tawdry formulae ful of inexactitudes, still trying to boost a crippled science that has long outgrown its use.
elvisinpersonator 8 months ago
@wfaulk1120 The moon does revolve on it's axis. Its rotational period is the same as its orbital period and this is why you only see one side of the moon from earth.
I believe it is called a Trapped Orbit.
stramster1 5 months ago
@wfaulk1120 About a 30 earth day complete rotation for our moon. The backside is in our daytime sky (backside facing us) when not visable at night. When we see it in the sky at night, the daytime side is on the other side. Hope this helps. Brian
BrianLuper 5 months ago
also I don't wanna be an ass but apollowasreal answered most of your questions you just don't seem to understand that he did.
And let's be real. this reflection you show us in that vid looks nothing like a spherical shape like a dome. it doesn't look like anything and it doesn't look like a structure. I have rocks in my backyard that look more structuraly designed than what is on this picture.
furiousmat 1 year ago
@furiousmat Read well the topic you'll see he refused to answer questions I asked 3 or 4 times!!!
Now I ask you 3 questions. I hope you will answer...
First do you think "intelligent ETs" exist in the Universe ?
Second do you think some of these went or are in the Solar System ?
Third do you think it's possible some of these have built structures on the Moon ?
I don't ask you a "proof", just your opinion...
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx I think it's possible that itelligent life exists somewhere else. note that there's a diffrence between aknowledging the possibility of it and being affirmative that it does exist.
If they do exist I have no idea if they ever came in our solar system. I have no idea of knowing if they do exist so how wouldI know if they came in our solar system?
as stated before I have no element that leads me to think they've been here so I don't think they built anything on the moon.
furiousmat 1 year ago
@furiousmat I could ask you the same thing as for 'ApolloWasReal' about OFFICIAL reports and declarations of militaries, witnesses on nuclear sites... Please watch the video "Disclosure Conference, National Press Club, 27 September 2010" on YT. And watch "NASA's Alien Anomalies caught on film - A compilation of stunning UFO footage from NASA's archives" (1 & 2).
Take your time, watch everything, and tell sincerely what you think about those documents for "visitors". If it's not ET what is it ?
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@furiousmat By the way for "UFO footage from NASA's archives 1 & 2" I don't say EVERY samples are ETs stuff or without none explanation, but a big part of them. For example you will see footages raping clearly laws of physics, "things/objects" in Earth orbit that can not be explained by official ways. ApolloWasReal said it's bullshit or 'ice crystals', that EVERYTHING can be explained. I wish to have your opinion, sincerely. And if it's not ET it's human but there would be a problem too then.
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx yeah well I will look at those videos soon enough but here's the thing you must never forget. Before einstein published his theory of relativity no1 could explain phenomenons related to it. Before the quantum mechanic was published tons of phenomenons happened without explainations. Even today our understanding of physics is limited and the absence of explaination for the behavior of an object is not the proof that this object is itelligently controled or that it's an alien.
furiousmat 1 year ago
@furiousmat Of course actual and official science is limited and fails on several points... But please watch those 3 videos and tell me after that what's your opinion. For nuclear sites you can also read "UFOs and Nukes" by Robert Hastings... hundreds of factual elements, official testimonies by militaries (sometimes high level).
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
Maybe it is a great big nugget of gold. Time for an Israel space program to begin?
thechessstick 1 year ago
ANd why there are big pixels around "building" which are diffrent from the rest.
laikros 1 year ago
I'm sorry mate, but that is a dust mote.
xybre 1 year ago
well I haven't seen anything of which you're talking about in the description. There is nothing like an "half circle shape" and certainly nothing that could be called "artificial architecture". All I see is a contrast flaw and this flaw doesn't even look like anything. It's just blurry and bright and there is nothing to see. NASA wont explain it not because they cant but because there is nothing to explain. jeez come on man get your shit together.
furiousmat 1 year ago 4
@furiousmat it has been proved that there are ancient glass domes on the moon, why glass?_ because when glass is on the moon it becomes 20 x stronger than steel
MephedroneMonster 1 year ago
@MephedroneMonster Oh well of course... "it has been proven".. if it has been proven please post a link to a serious piece of documentation that proves it. Or has it been proven as in "I saw a couple of videos o fit on youtube" or "someone said it on the internet". Oh and I would also want a link to a credible piece of documentation that states that glass somehow turns 20x stronger than steel "when it's on the moon". I'm open as long as you can get me real information. post your references
furiousmat 1 year ago
@furiousmat For glass not specially when it's on the Moon but with vacuum. There are no micro-imperfections/micro-impurities because of atmosphere.
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx I'm still waiting for the proof that there are glass domes.. and as for you glass resistanceit doesn't hold. Glass is superresistant when the object's just been formed but then you're right, it sustains micro damage that reduces its resistance significantly. The atmosphere isn't the only thing to cause these micro damages. Every piece of dust entering in contact with it may do it. To support that glass would be 20x resistant over a logn period of time on the moon means
furiousmat 1 year ago
@furiousmat For glass domes or glass structures on the Moon you gotta see with 'MephedroneMonster' or 'Richard C. Hoagland' I think... Or maybe with 'Vecherny Volgograd' who wrote 'Cities Found on the Moon' in russian Pravda in 2002 (translated on the web) and in this paper there is something about glass structures.
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx I think I know what you are refering to. This is about spectral analysis right? the man who deducted there must be glass domes because of light refraction and dominant red color in the background. I'm not even gonna get into describing how flawed this analysis is because it's a pain with these tiny messages but all I can tell you is that there are many things that can cause light to be refracted. and even if it was glass, nothing in this analysis supports that there would be "domes"
furiousmat 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx that these domes would have suffered absolutely no impact with any space particle over years. that is non-sense. and with that in mind, steel could also be significantly stronger if it didn't sustain micro damage. Every piece of material is subject to micro-damaging. And as I said, the micro-imperfection don't only happen in the making process. it also happens afterwards. to measure glass resistance without imperfection it has to be tested minutes after the piece is smelted.
furiousmat 1 year ago
@furiousmat "Glass" is maybe an expression or a shortcut for things found on the Moon which look like "glass". How could we know ET materials resistance, composition, etc...?
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx All his spectral analysis proved was that there existed a translucid material somewhere around when the picture was taken. could be anything. and to suppose that this material is ET designed is arbitrary and relies on nothing. Also supposing that they are domes is also arbitrary. nowhere on any picture is there any clear sign of a dome or of any translucid material or even a structure. since we don't even see it how is it relevent to start speculating on its shape or origin.
furiousmat 1 year ago
@furiousmat I agree... there is no "OFFICIAL PROOF" of translucid structures on the Moon. For 'domes' there's a french article published by 'Le Parisien - 24 nov. 1966' about this stuff on pictures of Lunar Orbiter 2, and high vertical pillars too. I think you can find the same informations in old US papers. The journalist in this article wrote for example that scientists said "those structures don't look like hills but like observatory domes". For images quality you already know what I think.
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
it's clearly a fault on the film, lots more like this on the original image, also obviously pre-digital and the grain does not match the surrounding area
bgdexter 1 year ago
nasa will say fuck you and your pics.
bulekki 1 year ago
All the people ther is involde in the ufo cirkus,or most of them are liers. Do remember its a way to make mony. Ufo is reel,and i hope that ufo people is not intresste in monymakers. And one thing more,the is proberly a big chans,the space is full of life.
MrSteen64 1 year ago
crashed alien space ship :D
McFat767 1 year ago
Thanks for this great video. Best regards.
TheAelfymade 1 year ago
I should have placed my comment below your quote where you indicated that you had some expertise in space travel. I just though you might have some more information on the subject than the rest of us. With respect to the moon pics, if NASA in fact airbrushes or otherwise modifies its pics then the taxpayers are wasting their money. Maybe some private venture ought to find out whats really up there and once and for all dispell any rumors. I'm on the fence with regard to the topic.
katoooq1 1 year ago
I should have placed my comment below your quote where you indicated that you had some expertise in space travel. I just though you might have some more information on the subject than the rest of us. With respect to the moon pics, if NASA in fact airbrushes or otherwise modifies its pics then the taxpayers are wasting their money. Maybe some private venture ought to find out whats really up there and once and for all dispell any rumors. I'm on the fence with regard to the topic.
katoooq1 1 year ago
@40390576 It's extremely common for conspiracy theorists and other fringe inhabitants to omit references. They don't *want* you to see them in context lest that undercut their argument.
Yes, this is a LO artifact. LO used a Polaroid-like camera system that exposed, processed and electronically scanned photographic film so it wouldn't have to be returned to earth. Electronic imaging sensors like CCDs didn't exist in the 1960s.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@ApolloWasReal LO or not it's not the only "anomaly" found on the Moon.
Maybe you never heard about the image AS17-135-20680 taken on the surface by Jack Schmitt. On the web try to find informations about this picture... and when you begin to play with light and contrast. What do "things" appearing make you think about ?
Do you pretend Edgar Mitchell (G. Cooper and many others for ETs subject) is a lier or a "conspiracy theorist" when he officially declares they were not alone on the Moon ?
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx I looked up AS17-135-20680. Hadn't seen it before for the very simple reason that it's one of three frames at the beginning of the magazine that were lightstruck as Jack Schmitt loaded and advanced it into the camera. It's astounding that anyone would actually try to read anything into it. But I guess that won't keep some people from trying.
I suppose it would spoil your fun to suggest that you look at the pictures just after this one.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
I could show you 1 million images from any databases, your answer will always be the same. As STS088 STS088-724-66_3 for example, I'm sure you can find an official explanation.
And 2 questions remaining if you don't mind...
- Did you find another official picture with this specific area on the video?
- Did you watch "Disclosure Conference, National Press Club, 27 September 2010"?
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx I do not think Edgar Mitchell is a liar. His interest in paranormal phenomena like ESP is well known.
Mitchell is an astronaut and an engineer, not a scientist. I'm an engineer myself so I hate to admit it, but even some engineers fall prey to some pretty weird, unsubstantiated beliefs like the late head of the Institute for Creation Research.
Besides, you won't make your case by appealing to authority. Try the scientific method; that works better.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@ApolloWasReal He's not a 'scientist' as physicists for example but he earned a bachelor, master and doctor of science degree. Aeronautical engineering, aeronautics and astronautics, all this stuff is based on maths, not apple pies or number of hairs on B. Palin's head.
So you don't think he's a liar. He declared Shepard and him were not alone on the Moon. He also says, as G. Cooper and others, Earth is visited by ETs. Should I believe him or you? Did you go on the Moon? Are you an astronaut?
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx As I said, even highly trained engineers sometimes fall prey to bogus, even embarrassing beliefs. We can be fooled; we're all human. That's precisely why the scientific method exists. It recognizes that individual humans make mistakes, so it corrects for individual errors by requiring that work be independently reproduced, verified and documented. If this isn't done, then the results are simply not acceptable science no matter how prestigious the person providing them.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ok so when is NASA and our "Government" going to come clean on all of this stuff and re-write the history books, that ought to keep people employed for the next thousand years
katoooq1 1 year ago
Ok so when is NASA and our "Government" going to come clean on all of this stuff and re-write the history books, that ought to keep people employed for the next thousand years.
katoooq1 1 year ago
@007bond66 Liar
24solarcycle 1 year ago
@007bond66 Liar
24solarcycle 1 year ago
It looks like an alien dropped a cassette tape.
theleetman 1 year ago
I don't think that N.A.S.A has to explain it. We are intelligent beings who can draw conclusions for ourselves. We realize that something is going on, but we must also realize that there are some that think that we can't handle reality. We however must positon ourselves to prove them wrong.
afrazafraz 1 year ago
typical youtube debates, people claiming righteous truth and fact while shitting on someone else's opinion.
JDurden33 1 year ago
i hope we meet aliens in my life time..
dingdongditcher69 1 year ago
@dingdongditcher69 me too but their is no evidence they exist. for something to exist it must have location. otherwire it is an emotion like love or hate.
datzfast 1 year ago
Sorry......... explain what! its a blob on photo taken from miles away.
stomecko 1 year ago
TRANSLATING СФЕРА - ЭТО РАДАР ДАЛЬНЕЙ СВЯЗИ!! А ПЕРЕБОРКИ - ЭТО ТРУБЫ ТРАНСПОРТНЫХ КАНАЛОВ ОТ ЗДАНИЯ БАЗЫ!! РАЗМЕР ДАННОЙ АНОМАЛИИ ОДИН КИЛОМЕТР!!!!!!!!!!! RUS
MegaPypkin 1 year ago
@MegaPypkin Как вы все это знаете? А размер?
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
Comment removed
MegaPypkin 1 year ago
@vitanovagypsy How do I deny such a thing? Easy. I deny it. Your claim is bullshit concocted by Bart Sibrel to hoodwink people like you into buying his DVD. If you look at the entire TV transmission, not just the parts Sibrel wants you to see, it's totally obvious that it really was taken in an Apollo CSM, with the earth going by the window.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
This is simply some type of foreign artifact on the image, i.e. dust, thread, etc. Take the ORIGINAL image, NOT the one in this video, and enlarge it by either 400 or 600%. You'll clearly see how it's heavily pixelated, compared to the rest of the image. Dead giveaway that the object isn't "real", or in other words, isn't actually sitting there on the Moon. Nice try though, just a bit too much enthusiasm in trying to find something strange & not enough actual studying to identify what it is.
offamychain 1 year ago 2
@offamychain In despite of the fact this "thing" is real or not, THERE ARE some artificial structures on the Moon, and not "official" ones. Take a look at the documentary "Moon Rising" for example... between others. You believe it or not I don't care, but now there is some interesting stuff, as for links or videos I quoted to 'ApolloWasReal'... and he means via his codes he doesn't really want to investigate just 5 minutes on those references. "Weather ballons" in Earth orbit seem... unusuals.
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx Sorry, but no. You can close your eyes, tap your heels three times and wish real hard, but that won't make alien artifacts appear on the moon. And by pointing to obvious Lunar Orbiter image defects and claiming that they're mysterious structures, you just make yourself look silly.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@ApolloWasReal Mmmhh ? I don't know where you take this pleasure to spend so much time on this page for a video you think it's "bullshit". Day after day, week after week, you're still there. Masochism addict ? And you refuse to look at links I posted during messages and messages. No answer from you about these references... You prefer to stay on your position : "NO ! ARTIFICIAL BUILDINGS ON THE MOON DO NOT EXIST ! THAT'S IMPOSSIBLE !" Well... with you, everything is possible.
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx Why do I come back? Good question. Maybe it's because I have a very low tolerance for bullshit. Especially obvious bullshit in a field I know something about (space flight) from people who are just too goddamned lazy to take the time to know better.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@ApolloWasReal So do you spend your entire life on videos about "alien stuff" to claim this is "bullshit" ? There are thousands on YT, a such hard work for you. If it's your hobby... You can't accept people to have doubts about NASA informations, or at least a part of them. That is your problem.
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx I fully accept that there are many crackpots like you out there who either think NASA faked the Apollo missions, or that they covered up "alien structures". Some even believe both. I know that I'll never change your mind with facts and logic when your position wasn't arrived at with facts and logic in the first place. But something has to be said for the benefit of ordinary people who come across these claims and who may not realize just how much bullshit they are.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@ApolloWasReal You repeat and repeat what you wrote in last messages. Nothing new... "It's forbidden to have doubts about NASA informations". So you will write another message to repeat "NASA never lies" or "someone must be silly to think NASA could lie". And so on... Is this a 'game' for you ? If you're looking for a sparring partner I think you're in the wrong place.
By the way it's an honor for me that you spend so much time on this video, between thousands ones more or less like this.
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx The fact that I can easily explain some or even most of the artifacts you claim are "UFOs" does not mean I have any obligation to do so. An alien structure on the moon certainly qualifies as an extraordinary claim, so the obligation is entirely yours to provide the required extraordinary evidence.
Sometimes there simply isn't enough information to determine what some particular blob may be. But that doesn't mean you get to proclaim "space aliens!" by default.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@ApolloWasReal You seem to mean that several brighting globes in Earth orbit (STS infra-red sample, end of the video), appearing one by one, placed in circle-like, are... "logical". And it's not the only one. Admit at least there's not an "official explanation" for EVERY examples. Or explain what this could be, if you really watched the whole video. Or the "black thing" follow in front of the Moon, followed by an amateur astronom. Etc etc etc... Will you reject these samples too ?
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx There are any number of possibilities for EVERY SINGLE ONE of these artifacts. Frozen water/urine dumps, loose fasteners and bits of thermal blanket are just a few. So are lens flares.
It's not for me to prove which specific artifact is in each picture, even though in many cases I can do just that. It's up to you to rule them ALL out. And you certainly haven't.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@ApolloWasReal "There are any number of possibilities for EVERY SINGLE ONE of these artifacts."
So can you explain with your science what are those brighting orbs appearing one by one on STS infra-red videos at the end of the video 'NASA's Alien Anomalies caught on film - A compilation of stunning UFO footage from NASA's archives' ? Thanx for your help...
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx "Or the "black thing" follow in front of the Moon, followed by an amateur astronom (er)"
LOL .... sounds like you've been peeking at MY images. I've been an astronomer for 3 decades, own 4 telescopes & several thousand $'s of CCD equipment, and have made several "discoveries". One of those, published to the web, was a black "worm" moving in front of the Moon. Amazing how spider silk inside the dew cap can fool even a knowledgeable astronomer.
offamychain 1 year ago
@offamychain Have you watched the sequence/sample in question mister astronomer ?
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@ApolloWasReal Maybe you can enlighten us about the issue of UFO's over Nuclear bases, the ones that were discussed in the September 2010 National Press Club video.
katoooq1 1 year ago
@katoooq1 And what does this have to do with the moon?
You don't understand how this works. One doesn't get to point to fuzzy blobs on a picture and say "these are aliens unless you can prove otherwise". If YOU make the claim then it's up to YOU to prove it.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
@xxxAlethxxx "where you take this pleasure to spend so much time on this page for a video you think it's "bullshit"." There is no "PLEASURE" in what he's doing, trust me. I've been forced to do the same thing many times. You take what WE do ... true science ... and contort it into ignorant, amateurish, & worthless JUNK. And guess who gets to explain to the general public that what people like you are claiming, ISN'T what's really happening. You sure won't, so you can probably guess who does.
offamychain 1 year ago
@offamychain For your information there are "objects" now which are official, and were categorized in files 'science fiction' a few years are. And NASA still declares this is bullshit. What are these objects ? Solid ones, detected by army, radars, it's OFFICIAL now. There are a lot of 'archives disclosure' for some years and you can't tell they don't exist. Or you pretend these military corps lie. Find 'Twelve Government Documents That Take UFOs Seriously' on OpenMinds and you'll understand...
xxxAlethxxx 1 year ago
@offamychain Yes, Lunar Orbiter was infamous for image artifacts. Until modern CCDs, high resolution photography required film, but returning it from the moon is difficult and expensive. Kodak developed a way to develop 70mm film on board so it could be scanned electronically and sent to earth. A 'bimat', a second film covered with gelatin and chemicals, was rolled against the film. Sometimes the rollers stuck or the two films didn't contact perfectly, leaving "bubbles" in the image like this.
ApolloWasReal 1 year ago
Ah so, it came from Lunar Orbiter. They carried a film imaging system much like a Polaroid camera. The exposed film was developed on board, scanned and sent to earth. There are MANY artifacts just like this one in Lunar Orbiter pictures from sticking rollers, incomplete contact with the developer chemicals, drops of chemicals remaining on the film, etc.
Sorry, but this is not a real feature on the moon.
ApolloWasReal