Nobody denies that there is such a thing as science, or that science has contributed to humankind's progress, but it's equally obvious that science has ben a mixed blessing, and that much of science has become a perversion of the word's meaning, vaccination being one of them. It's IMO also obscene that technology to kill people has become the world's largest industry.
Something ingested by human being's causes autism. At least give me a thumbs up if you agree. Whether it is vaccines or something else, at least give me that. My son is 2 years old and BECAME autistic after turning a year old. He was communicating with us through facial expressions, eye contact and a few words. He now does not speak and has very limited eye contact. He has extensive therapy and is slowly progressing. Do you think autism is a birth defect? I beg to differ.
Due to the numerous conspiracy comments on this video, I feel that it is neccessary point out that if there really was a medical conspiracy then doctors would not ask if someone is allergic to any medication in order to prevent an unneccessary allergic reaction.
That's because most doctors don't have a clu that vaccinations are biowarfare against civilians. They think vaccines have something to do with disease prevention! What idiots.
i wish mr Offit a lot of fun taking the 10.000 shots of vaccin he claims to b totally harmless to anyone. If he doesnt he is the fraud and coward of the vaccinationindustry, backing up fraudulous medicine with fraudulous science and data-mingling.
Listen carefully what he is saying, but remember it's far more important to understand what he is NOT saying.
After the Hannah Poling-verdict no one can ever claim 100% safety when it comes to correlating vaccins and autism.
I'm afraid our being poisoned with vaccines goes back a lot further than Hannah Poling, cybeavertoo. It actually goes back over 200 years, to Edward Jenner's useless and barbaric copox vaccine he mistakenly thought might prevent smallpox. The vaccine maimed and killed countless children, as wel as some adults, and spread syphilis, gonorrhea and TB, while not protecting even a single person from smallpox, ever.
All I know is that my son was a healthy happy child until the vaccines were administered. Unfortunately, this was a gradual descend and I never kept a diary to note the changes. Why would I. Now, 11 years later, and after many doctor's visits, it seems to me that there is a link. I base this on treatments to get rid of toxins and the tremendous improvement in my childs life. Is it possible to have an independent unbiased study done? I don't care for comments from someone who has much to lose.
Keep in mind that autism is a condition that changes as time progresses. I'm autistic but I never had a high amount of toxins in my body and I was vaccinated with the same vaccines as my brother was, yet I'm the only autistic in my family.
There has been so many large scale researchs that show there is the exact same proportion of autist people amoung those who got vaccine and those who didn't !
It is 100% irrationnal to STILL believe vaccine has anything to do with autism.
Saying that scientists "lie" to protect pharmaceutical company show a complete lack of understanding of the basis of research.
Nobody can claim any 100% safety after the conviction of the vaccinationindustry in the Hannah Poling-case
Even the industry doesnt claim 100% safety. Its just they wont accept negative impact from vaccination on latent autistic children as a riskgroup, and they have not been willing to invest in a well-defined scientific research. All their research untill now is based on rendering non-specifically assembled statistic data They have not done any research to real the fisiology processes involved
Today, "scientific method" equates to "scientific fraud". Mind you, even Pasteur has been found to falsify his "scientific" experiments to validate his (flawed) thories, and it seems nothing much has changed since then.
That's why we have Mickey Mouse scientists announcing obviously fake results of obviously fake studies, like "vaccines do not cause autism", "vaccines prevent cot deat," "mercury is good for baies," "giving a baby 10,000 vaccines is not a problem."
Sure, this is why more than ten international studies made by different scientists have led to the conclusion that there isthe same % of autistic people in a population that get vaccined and another one that doesn't ?
Today scientific method allowed you to have acces to youtube, to drinkable water, to TV, radio, car, electricity, nuclear power, cheap food, and a life expectency of 78 years during which you'll see the world change even more because of this method.
"more than ten international studies made by different scientists have led to the conclusion that there isthe same % of autistic people in a population that get vaccined and another one that doesn't"
Can you send links to my youtube inbox?
I'll send you links that support a vaccine autism connection.
Get real. Merck commissioned ghost writers to come up with safety studies for VIOXX, then paid prestigious doctors to attach their names to these stories. Some 55,000 people died from VIOXX, and Merck was ordered to pay an enormous amount of money in compensation, which Merck is now recovering through the sale of its fake cervical cancer vaccine.
Typical tinfoil hat conspiracy buff. You can't listen to logic and reasoning and you're only source of information is "Google." Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a hypocrite since he flys in private jets and complains against man-made global warming which is a scam in its own right.
mr Offit's clear interest is in cleaning the reputation of the vaccination-industry, which is a understandable undertaking for a man so interwoven with this businessHis big fraud is that in doing so,he is willing to sacrifice every thought, fact or autistic person that stands in the way of his acclaimed truths, by the use of biased statistical renderings. But his fight is an already lost one.Nobody can claim absolute safety after the Hannah Poling-case.Thats the slippery slope he tries to hide.
scientists have their own set of methods and beliefs to feel secure about their undertakings.Offit and most other pro-vaccinators are rigid believers in the legitimacy of statistics to defend the vaccination-industry. Its their central flaw they never want to adress explicit processes in the individual body.Statistics wont help individual people and calling them to the defence is nothing less then sacrificing autistic fulnerable children (and some others)to the statistical significant majority.
Statistics help because they're evidence and data. If it turns out that vaccines do cause said damage, the scientists will be the ones to discover it (NOT Jenny Freakin' McCarthy) and make necessary changes. You don't understand how science works and are religious in your baseless ideas on what's reality.
The point that's being made is that we need to help autistic people, and the vaccine hypothesis is wasting precious time and money.
Why swear at people when u can have decent conversation?
What r u so afraid of?
Sorry to say, but if u want to call statistics 'proof and evidence' u dont understand a thing about the essence of statistics. Stats r just lists of found data answering specific questions and no other then that. Processed data can help finding answers, but r not answers by themselves. Interpreting and processing data is a science by itself and often misused to get to certain answers. Stats r very vulnarable to bias
Stats can b helpfull, but no 'proof' because they function within a relative space.Thats why there is a stat for every side and the best to claim is relative truth, which is certainly not the case with mr Offit
It is my personal observation that certain vaccination disturb autistic fulnerable individuals to an extend that bring to the front in a much earlier stage certain autistic elements,that if given time would have come out differently and less lifechanging, even without any need to noticing
if u want to help autistic people, the last thing to do is to follow one prophet like mr Offit with his biased mindset and shallow statistic truths, but to take in account all data, from all sides, trying to find a balance or synergical direction AND every moment possible trying to relate that to the reality of real-life observations and try to find out in which way they r genuine or not.
That can differ from case to case, individual, personal.
So mr Offit is selling false information and false treatment and is NOT making money by it? Now that is one stupid guy!
Almost as stupid as the creationists that u mistakingly want me to have associated with.
And scientific research these days?.. well research should b evidence based, past present and future.
Beware for statistic truths! there is a stat for everything They r very vulnerable to interpretation and rendering because they r always functioning in a mathematical relative space.
I implied that he is indeed NOT selling false informaiton because he is a scientist and has a reputation and an ethic code to respect.
Second, you seem critical toward statistics. Great but it is the METHOD used to get them that determine if it is reliable.
Statistic that come from professional scientists will ALWAYS use reliable methods because they would not keep their job ! I studied research methods at university have a 100% confidence in those people.
If you associate Offit with ethics, you must live in lalaland. This guy is a criminal, as anyone is who injects - or advocates the injection of - vaccines into babies and children.
You're obviously also oblivious to the fact that vaccination is itself an organised criminal enterprise and the biggest swindle in human history.
Of course, statistics that come from marketing departments are not reliable but those that come from universities has nothing to do with.
Your oversuspicion is quite funny since you prefer to believe rumors about vaccine than scholars of this specific field of research.
There is wounderful books that could explain you the scientific research process. Mine has 480 pages and I used it for a class at university. Now if you still have doubts about my words do some research by yourself.
i researched your opinion very well and came to the conlusion that u have no critical approach towards scientists and their applied methods, but want to stick ur head in the sand of textbook truths and personal believes.
Because somebody is a scientist doesnt make him/her reliable! Reliability is not a profession. Because something is in the textbooks doesnt make it true. Truth is always one step further than your biased timeframe. Its not just statistics that function in relative space.
Tip: avoid ad hominems. It devalues your argument completely.
Stats aren't good alone, unless they independently confirm each other. Your stance is "I believe my claim that asserts something, but you have to disprove me despite my burden of proof." Stats are vulnerable to bias, unless they're approached scientifically. So, I don't see how I can argue against your position, as it's faith-based and religious... not to mention irrational. Stats aren't just lists. Wow.. you really are stupid...
stats ARE science, its a way mathematical scientists try to descripe reality in terms of numbers. Its the individual scientists that usher in biases, not science itself.Like i said earlier scientists use their own systems of belief and methods to feel secure, which makes their claims not possitively correct if not weight against ruling paradigms and personal interest. Like it is very much the case with mr Offit above
tip: try to learn the meaning of 'ad hominem', so u can avoid using them urself
Mr.Offit is a liar and a fraud.Paul Offit's hero Maurice Hilleman along with Dr. Robert Gallo both helped secretly create bioweapons for the united states military. These were viruses that caused cancer and what is known today as the AIDS virus. These bioweapons were injected into gays in San Francisco and black Africans which launched the AIDS epidemic. The purpose of this was for depopulation. Also known as mass murder or genocide using the fraudulent excuse of the Earth being overpopulated.
The frustrating (but obvious) truth is that parents of autistic children currently have the choice of reading emotionally powerful accounts of how vaccination causes autism (and even suggested "cures")... or they can read actual science, which so far can tell us that we don't really *know* what causes autism -- we just know it isn't vaccines (and avoiding vaccines can be far more dangerous).
Please, everyone, take the time to learn the truth, not just what makes you feel better.
I have aspergers syndrome i can tell you now the role mercuy has to play in autism is practically non-existent,autism is a combination of genetics and environmental factors
what environmental factors could they be? How do you know Mercury, or the live viruses in vaccines don't cause severe autism? I don't believe it is Asperger's Syndrome that people are much worried about.
Firstly aspergers syndrome is on the autistic spectrum i'm fortunate enough to only have a mild case of it.i can personally attest that there would be numerous amounts of parents in the world that would disagree with you,there have been reems of evidence discounting the vaccine theory,most supposed cases being hysterical ignorant panic mongering parents,i did not not speak till i was six ,without years of devlopmental training i would be still a closed human being,environmental=devleopmental.
I am the parent of a 19 year old who was vaccinated at about his first birthday. After that he started staring out into space and lost his speach. I am not the only parent who has had these experiences. In any event, I am convinced that we should wait until after a child is 3 years old before injecting him with vaccines.
As a non-parent, I won't pretend that I know the difficulties you and your son have faced. But what evidence do you have to support your recommendation?
For instance: What epidemiological studies have shown that delaying until 3 years is safer? If any, what is the mechanism, and what distinguishes the 3-year-old's immune system from the infant's? Which vaccines should be delayed? Since infants are exposed from birth to thousands of environmental antigens, why are vaccines different? etc.
My son was born with thrush (Candida), visible around the corners of his mouth. It didn't occur to me until I read the insert to the Hepatitis vaccine stating that individuals with Candida sensitivity, should avoid taking the vaccine, that vaccines in general may be contraindicated in such cases. He should have been treated for the thrush before being given any vaccines. I now give my son probiotics which has helped him a great deal.
PS. To whoever clicked "thumbs down" on Sarah's comment: why? It is a perfectly understandable opinion, and civil and non-threatening, unlike some on here.
Offit's a liar, simple as that. He knows we cure autism by removing the mercury that was shot into infants and he commits malpractice evry time he opens his mouth. Offit belongs in prison for a long time.
the man makes me sick. would he rather call what my daughter has encephalitis, and that being caused by a vaccine would make it ok?
Perhaps some cases of autism need a new name. Post MMR encephalopathy with autistic like features. Guess I should just be happy she didn't die from the measles...
Vaccines have saved millions of lives and kept all of us safe from deadly diseases. I am thankful for these vaccines! Hopefully, researchers can find the true cause(s) of autism for these families and take vaccines "off the hook" so to speak.
He wrote it. He, unlike yourself, is actually educated about the subject. Please show me a study that directly links vaccination to autism. If you can't find one, I assume you'll just use the radical claim that all scientists and doctors are a part of some conspiracy. Educate yourself, please. Education does not constitute a Google search.
I can show you plenty. btw, a google SCHOLAR search pulls up some interesting stuff. So does PubMed. Live virus vaccines can do some nasty things to an improperly responding immune system.
Hey imbecile, I'm one of those parents who cure autism by removing the mercury that was shot into babies. Offit could help cure autistic kids too but he's more concerned with lying about this so he make more money selling the vaccines that kill babies.
@sickofdumbpeople2008 PubMed....search for the term: Thimerosal, which is the mercury-containing compound used as a preservative in these vaccines even given to infants at birth and you will find many studies on the effects of the compound on animals and human beings. Hope this helps! :)
@MadMadamJess The "results" the researcher is speaking of is the CDC, FDA, etc.."conclusion" of the actual studies...these original studies can be found for free on PubMed..again, search the term: Thimerosal.
Answer this question :
How can someone who live in an advanced country question the scientific method while being surrended by its products ?
How can somebody living in a civilisation that has dominate the world for centuries because of its scientific advance question this method ?
How can somebody who have access to the greatest libraries and universities of the world, choose ignorance over education ?
It's changing the world as you read and you manage to deny its validity ?
sentenced988 2 years ago
"Answer this question"
Nobody denies that there is such a thing as science, or that science has contributed to humankind's progress, but it's equally obvious that science has ben a mixed blessing, and that much of science has become a perversion of the word's meaning, vaccination being one of them. It's IMO also obscene that technology to kill people has become the world's largest industry.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Something ingested by human being's causes autism. At least give me a thumbs up if you agree. Whether it is vaccines or something else, at least give me that. My son is 2 years old and BECAME autistic after turning a year old. He was communicating with us through facial expressions, eye contact and a few words. He now does not speak and has very limited eye contact. He has extensive therapy and is slowly progressing. Do you think autism is a birth defect? I beg to differ.
nickorow 2 years ago
Due to the numerous conspiracy comments on this video, I feel that it is neccessary point out that if there really was a medical conspiracy then doctors would not ask if someone is allergic to any medication in order to prevent an unneccessary allergic reaction.
aspie101 2 years ago
That's because most doctors don't have a clu that vaccinations are biowarfare against civilians. They think vaccines have something to do with disease prevention! What idiots.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Comment removed
sentenced988 2 years ago
i wish mr Offit a lot of fun taking the 10.000 shots of vaccin he claims to b totally harmless to anyone. If he doesnt he is the fraud and coward of the vaccinationindustry, backing up fraudulous medicine with fraudulous science and data-mingling.
Listen carefully what he is saying, but remember it's far more important to understand what he is NOT saying.
After the Hannah Poling-verdict no one can ever claim 100% safety when it comes to correlating vaccins and autism.
cybeavertoo 2 years ago
I'm afraid our being poisoned with vaccines goes back a lot further than Hannah Poling, cybeavertoo. It actually goes back over 200 years, to Edward Jenner's useless and barbaric copox vaccine he mistakenly thought might prevent smallpox. The vaccine maimed and killed countless children, as wel as some adults, and spread syphilis, gonorrhea and TB, while not protecting even a single person from smallpox, ever.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
All I know is that my son was a healthy happy child until the vaccines were administered. Unfortunately, this was a gradual descend and I never kept a diary to note the changes. Why would I. Now, 11 years later, and after many doctor's visits, it seems to me that there is a link. I base this on treatments to get rid of toxins and the tremendous improvement in my childs life. Is it possible to have an independent unbiased study done? I don't care for comments from someone who has much to lose.
villayzan 2 years ago
Keep in mind that autism is a condition that changes as time progresses. I'm autistic but I never had a high amount of toxins in my body and I was vaccinated with the same vaccines as my brother was, yet I'm the only autistic in my family.
aspie101 2 years ago
I'm sorry but it don't change anything.
There has been so many large scale researchs that show there is the exact same proportion of autist people amoung those who got vaccine and those who didn't !
It is 100% irrationnal to STILL believe vaccine has anything to do with autism.
Saying that scientists "lie" to protect pharmaceutical company show a complete lack of understanding of the basis of research.
Go read the wiki article of "scientific method"
sentenced988 2 years ago
Nobody can claim any 100% safety after the conviction of the vaccinationindustry in the Hannah Poling-case
Even the industry doesnt claim 100% safety. Its just they wont accept negative impact from vaccination on latent autistic children as a riskgroup, and they have not been willing to invest in a well-defined scientific research. All their research untill now is based on rendering non-specifically assembled statistic data They have not done any research to real the fisiology processes involved
cybeavertoo 2 years ago
Today, "scientific method" equates to "scientific fraud". Mind you, even Pasteur has been found to falsify his "scientific" experiments to validate his (flawed) thories, and it seems nothing much has changed since then.
That's why we have Mickey Mouse scientists announcing obviously fake results of obviously fake studies, like "vaccines do not cause autism", "vaccines prevent cot deat," "mercury is good for baies," "giving a baby 10,000 vaccines is not a problem."
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Sure, this is why more than ten international studies made by different scientists have led to the conclusion that there isthe same % of autistic people in a population that get vaccined and another one that doesn't ?
Today scientific method allowed you to have acces to youtube, to drinkable water, to TV, radio, car, electricity, nuclear power, cheap food, and a life expectency of 78 years during which you'll see the world change even more because of this method.
sentenced988 2 years ago
"more than ten international studies made by different scientists have led to the conclusion that there isthe same % of autistic people in a population that get vaccined and another one that doesn't"
Can you send links to my youtube inbox?
I'll send you links that support a vaccine autism connection.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Get real. Merck commissioned ghost writers to come up with safety studies for VIOXX, then paid prestigious doctors to attach their names to these stories. Some 55,000 people died from VIOXX, and Merck was ordered to pay an enormous amount of money in compensation, which Merck is now recovering through the sale of its fake cervical cancer vaccine.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Merck doesn't sell vaccin against cervical cancer. How funny isn't ?
sentenced988 2 years ago
Is there anyone watching this vid who do not believe in some outlandish government/pharmacudical conspiracy theory? If so, please speak.
aspie101 3 years ago
There is no reason to BELIEVE in such a conspiracy, because it's so very obvious and evident that it exists. .
Google 'Deadly Immunity' by US Snr. Attorney Robert F Kennedy Jnr.,
or 'The Truth about the Vaccine Cover-up' by US neurosurgeon Dr Russell Blaylock MD.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Typical tinfoil hat conspiracy buff. You can't listen to logic and reasoning and you're only source of information is "Google." Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a hypocrite since he flys in private jets and complains against man-made global warming which is a scam in its own right.
aspie101 2 years ago
That still doesn't mean that what he says about the harm vaccines and the mercury in them cause is incorrect.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
mr Offit's clear interest is in cleaning the reputation of the vaccination-industry, which is a understandable undertaking for a man so interwoven with this businessHis big fraud is that in doing so,he is willing to sacrifice every thought, fact or autistic person that stands in the way of his acclaimed truths, by the use of biased statistical renderings. But his fight is an already lost one.Nobody can claim absolute safety after the Hannah Poling-case.Thats the slippery slope he tries to hide.
cybeavertoo 3 years ago
scientists have their own set of methods and beliefs to feel secure about their undertakings.Offit and most other pro-vaccinators are rigid believers in the legitimacy of statistics to defend the vaccination-industry. Its their central flaw they never want to adress explicit processes in the individual body.Statistics wont help individual people and calling them to the defence is nothing less then sacrificing autistic fulnerable children (and some others)to the statistical significant majority.
cybeavertoo 3 years ago
Statistics help because they're evidence and data. If it turns out that vaccines do cause said damage, the scientists will be the ones to discover it (NOT Jenny Freakin' McCarthy) and make necessary changes. You don't understand how science works and are religious in your baseless ideas on what's reality.
The point that's being made is that we need to help autistic people, and the vaccine hypothesis is wasting precious time and money.
AshillaBeige 3 years ago
Why swear at people when u can have decent conversation?
What r u so afraid of?
Sorry to say, but if u want to call statistics 'proof and evidence' u dont understand a thing about the essence of statistics. Stats r just lists of found data answering specific questions and no other then that. Processed data can help finding answers, but r not answers by themselves. Interpreting and processing data is a science by itself and often misused to get to certain answers. Stats r very vulnarable to bias
cybeavertoo 3 years ago
Stats can b helpfull, but no 'proof' because they function within a relative space.Thats why there is a stat for every side and the best to claim is relative truth, which is certainly not the case with mr Offit
It is my personal observation that certain vaccination disturb autistic fulnerable individuals to an extend that bring to the front in a much earlier stage certain autistic elements,that if given time would have come out differently and less lifechanging, even without any need to noticing
cybeavertoo 3 years ago
if u want to help autistic people, the last thing to do is to follow one prophet like mr Offit with his biased mindset and shallow statistic truths, but to take in account all data, from all sides, trying to find a balance or synergical direction AND every moment possible trying to relate that to the reality of real-life observations and try to find out in which way they r genuine or not.
That can differ from case to case, individual, personal.
cybeavertoo 3 years ago
Wake up folk,
It's not mr offit who will make money by selling false information and false treatment to people.
Go make some research on how works scientific research these days. The way you write show a serious lack education on this issue.
I'm sure you're the kind of people that believe in creatures that can create everything in 7 days and then have the politness to tell us !
sentenced988 2 years ago
So mr Offit is selling false information and false treatment and is NOT making money by it? Now that is one stupid guy!
Almost as stupid as the creationists that u mistakingly want me to have associated with.
And scientific research these days?.. well research should b evidence based, past present and future.
Beware for statistic truths! there is a stat for everything They r very vulnerable to interpretation and rendering because they r always functioning in a mathematical relative space.
cybeavertoo 2 years ago
I implied that he is indeed NOT selling false informaiton because he is a scientist and has a reputation and an ethic code to respect.
Second, you seem critical toward statistics. Great but it is the METHOD used to get them that determine if it is reliable.
Statistic that come from professional scientists will ALWAYS use reliable methods because they would not keep their job ! I studied research methods at university have a 100% confidence in those people.
sentenced988 2 years ago
If you associate Offit with ethics, you must live in lalaland. This guy is a criminal, as anyone is who injects - or advocates the injection of - vaccines into babies and children.
You're obviously also oblivious to the fact that vaccination is itself an organised criminal enterprise and the biggest swindle in human history.
vaccineshurtbabies 2 years ago
Of course, statistics that come from marketing departments are not reliable but those that come from universities has nothing to do with.
Your oversuspicion is quite funny since you prefer to believe rumors about vaccine than scholars of this specific field of research.
There is wounderful books that could explain you the scientific research process. Mine has 480 pages and I used it for a class at university. Now if you still have doubts about my words do some research by yourself.
sentenced988 2 years ago
i researched your opinion very well and came to the conlusion that u have no critical approach towards scientists and their applied methods, but want to stick ur head in the sand of textbook truths and personal believes.
Because somebody is a scientist doesnt make him/her reliable! Reliability is not a profession. Because something is in the textbooks doesnt make it true. Truth is always one step further than your biased timeframe. Its not just statistics that function in relative space.
cybeavertoo 2 years ago
Tip: avoid ad hominems. It devalues your argument completely.
Stats aren't good alone, unless they independently confirm each other. Your stance is "I believe my claim that asserts something, but you have to disprove me despite my burden of proof." Stats are vulnerable to bias, unless they're approached scientifically. So, I don't see how I can argue against your position, as it's faith-based and religious... not to mention irrational. Stats aren't just lists. Wow.. you really are stupid...
AshillaBeige 3 years ago
stats ARE science, its a way mathematical scientists try to descripe reality in terms of numbers. Its the individual scientists that usher in biases, not science itself.Like i said earlier scientists use their own systems of belief and methods to feel secure, which makes their claims not possitively correct if not weight against ruling paradigms and personal interest. Like it is very much the case with mr Offit above
tip: try to learn the meaning of 'ad hominem', so u can avoid using them urself
cybeavertoo 3 years ago
Mr.Offit is a liar and a fraud.Paul Offit's hero Maurice Hilleman along with Dr. Robert Gallo both helped secretly create bioweapons for the united states military. These were viruses that caused cancer and what is known today as the AIDS virus. These bioweapons were injected into gays in San Francisco and black Africans which launched the AIDS epidemic. The purpose of this was for depopulation. Also known as mass murder or genocide using the fraudulent excuse of the Earth being overpopulated.
oxbridge380 3 years ago
lasdfjf
oxbridge380 3 years ago
The frustrating (but obvious) truth is that parents of autistic children currently have the choice of reading emotionally powerful accounts of how vaccination causes autism (and even suggested "cures")... or they can read actual science, which so far can tell us that we don't really *know* what causes autism -- we just know it isn't vaccines (and avoiding vaccines can be far more dangerous).
Please, everyone, take the time to learn the truth, not just what makes you feel better.
jtheory 3 years ago
This sick man is a liar, and a patent holder for a vaccine, of COURSE he says they are safe!
aware4autism 3 years ago
I have aspergers syndrome i can tell you now the role mercuy has to play in autism is practically non-existent,autism is a combination of genetics and environmental factors
corganite7 3 years ago
what environmental factors could they be? How do you know Mercury, or the live viruses in vaccines don't cause severe autism? I don't believe it is Asperger's Syndrome that people are much worried about.
aware4autism 3 years ago
Firstly aspergers syndrome is on the autistic spectrum i'm fortunate enough to only have a mild case of it.i can personally attest that there would be numerous amounts of parents in the world that would disagree with you,there have been reems of evidence discounting the vaccine theory,most supposed cases being hysterical ignorant panic mongering parents,i did not not speak till i was six ,without years of devlopmental training i would be still a closed human being,environmental=devleopmental.
corganite7 3 years ago
I am the parent of a 19 year old who was vaccinated at about his first birthday. After that he started staring out into space and lost his speach. I am not the only parent who has had these experiences. In any event, I am convinced that we should wait until after a child is 3 years old before injecting him with vaccines.
sarahferst 3 years ago
As a non-parent, I won't pretend that I know the difficulties you and your son have faced. But what evidence do you have to support your recommendation?
For instance: What epidemiological studies have shown that delaying until 3 years is safer? If any, what is the mechanism, and what distinguishes the 3-year-old's immune system from the infant's? Which vaccines should be delayed? Since infants are exposed from birth to thousands of environmental antigens, why are vaccines different? etc.
parallelepipete 3 years ago 2
My son was born with thrush (Candida), visible around the corners of his mouth. It didn't occur to me until I read the insert to the Hepatitis vaccine stating that individuals with Candida sensitivity, should avoid taking the vaccine, that vaccines in general may be contraindicated in such cases. He should have been treated for the thrush before being given any vaccines. I now give my son probiotics which has helped him a great deal.
sarahferst 3 years ago
PS. To whoever clicked "thumbs down" on Sarah's comment: why? It is a perfectly understandable opinion, and civil and non-threatening, unlike some on here.
parallelepipete 3 years ago
Offit's a liar, simple as that. He knows we cure autism by removing the mercury that was shot into infants and he commits malpractice evry time he opens his mouth. Offit belongs in prison for a long time.
foresam 3 years ago
not to mention what his live virus rotateq is doing to babies with immunodeficiency. It can kill them, you know...
aware4autism 3 years ago
Yes, I know. Lots of murderers write books, don't they?
foresam 3 years ago
the man makes me sick. would he rather call what my daughter has encephalitis, and that being caused by a vaccine would make it ok?
Perhaps some cases of autism need a new name. Post MMR encephalopathy with autistic like features. Guess I should just be happy she didn't die from the measles...
aware4autism 3 years ago
Vaccines have saved millions of lives and kept all of us safe from deadly diseases. I am thankful for these vaccines! Hopefully, researchers can find the true cause(s) of autism for these families and take vaccines "off the hook" so to speak.
cinnyluvscats 3 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The usual hype from the whore of the vaccine industry. Who ghost wrote the book for you, Dr. Offit?
jw4994 3 years ago
He wrote it. He, unlike yourself, is actually educated about the subject. Please show me a study that directly links vaccination to autism. If you can't find one, I assume you'll just use the radical claim that all scientists and doctors are a part of some conspiracy. Educate yourself, please. Education does not constitute a Google search.
sickofdumbpeople2008 3 years ago 6
I can show you plenty. btw, a google SCHOLAR search pulls up some interesting stuff. So does PubMed. Live virus vaccines can do some nasty things to an improperly responding immune system.
aware4autism 3 years ago
Hey imbecile, I'm one of those parents who cure autism by removing the mercury that was shot into babies. Offit could help cure autistic kids too but he's more concerned with lying about this so he make more money selling the vaccines that kill babies.
foresam 3 years ago
@sickofdumbpeople2008 PubMed....search for the term: Thimerosal, which is the mercury-containing compound used as a preservative in these vaccines even given to infants at birth and you will find many studies on the effects of the compound on animals and human beings. Hope this helps! :)
xoxoxo -Jess
MadMadamJess 9 months ago
@MadMadamJess The "results" the researcher is speaking of is the CDC, FDA, etc.."conclusion" of the actual studies...these original studies can be found for free on PubMed..again, search the term: Thimerosal.
xoxoxo
MadMadamJess 9 months ago