9/11: PROOF NO MISSILE hit Pentagon, as Proven by News Video from 9/11 (updated -- Flight 77

[ethanvid]

It's all just a cover up. They want us to think it was a missile or a hijacked plane. But it was really an alien attack that almost got a little out of hand.

[BlazeTheJuggalo1]

Could not use the chemicals to make it explode and just use a solid missile..so get your shit straight

[B0rn2ball111]

a plane hit the pentagon really? then how did it create such a perfect circle? and why was their no debree of any plane on the ground? and why did the fbi confiscate survillance videos from both a hotel and gas station that showed exactly what hit the pentagon? they were never released

[sparkyscooter]

not even close evidence.

[snaz27]

JonathonMoseley... I hear you and what you say is logical, about the 270 feet thing... But that hole is not big enough for the jet, besides, a jet would make 3 holes! Wouldn't it? As for the missile, well why couldn't they have laid explosives on the other walls to look like the plane went through, timed to go off when the missile hit? Or maybe it was a new kind of missile?

[irondawson]

No Airplane made that initial small hole just not possible for a big jet, I vote missle

[kensmind]

You're wrong. Bunker busters do just that. They are set to explode past the wall. A bunker buster would produce everything we saw on 9/11.

[JonathonMoseley]

@kensmind Bunker busters fall verticlaly (down) by gravity and penetrate into the ground, explode, and make a bloody mess of everything. Bunker busters are not missiles. They do not travel horizontally.  And when they explode, they destroy everything in all directions, including at a great depth. They would not leave anythign intact. Any such explosion would destroy the upper floors and send them flying everywhere. No explosive could create 270 feet of destruction inside the building

[slavenations]

@JonathonMoseley "Missiles -

"The extra speed provided by a rocket motor enables greater penetration of a missile-mounted bunker buster warhead. To reach maximum penetration (Impact depth), the warhead may consist of a high density projectile only. Such a warhead carries more energy than a warhead with chemical explosives (kinetic energy of a projectile at hypervelocity)."

- from the wikipedia page titled "Bunker Buster." now kindly stfu.

[Joshi069]

show me proof that the plane was even there then. show me debris.

show me proof of this, "a missile would blow up and out, up to 1/4 of a mile away". what maths proves this? there are more than one single missile out there. this video lacks extreme proof of anything. face it, your government is a selfish group of retarded humans who simply brainwashed an entire nation to support its agenda in a single day, that day being 9/11.

[JonathonMoseley]

First, the world does not revolve around you. It would be nice if I did not have to be rude, but to cure your narcissim we must start with the fact that nobody has to prove anything to you. It does not matter what you think. it does not matter what you believe.

However, the airplane debris was strewn for 270 feet INSIDE the Pentagon, witnessed by hundreds of people.

You were not there, so you did not see it.

The fact that you were not there does not entitle you to demand anything

[Joshi069]

Well in that case it does not matter what you believe either.

I know the world does not revolve around me, but well spoken, kind of like a FUCKHEAD.

I didn't for one second connotate that it does.

You were not there, you did not see it, so what entitles you to post a video like this then?

Stop playing cards that I can play too.

[JonathonMoseley]

So how is one going to "SHOW YOU" airplane debris strewn INSIDE the Pentagon across as 270 foot swath, 90 feet wide at the entrance, and narrowing down to a pont on the far side of the inner C Ring?

Hundreds of people saw the debris INSIDE the Pentagon.

What exactly do you expect to be shown 8 years later?

The fact that Arlington, VA firefighters, cops, private engineers, THE INSURANCE CO, & THE AIRLINE all confirmed the parts of their aircraft inside the Pentagon doesn't count?

[bryanwilks000]

why wont the Government show the public the survelliance videos of the crash. the only video out there look a lot like a missle. it seems the government would release the video to prove all of the Truthers wrong, unless they have something to hide.

[JonathonMoseley]

The government HAS shown the public all the videos that exist.

The video DOES NOT look like a missile.

A missile COULD NOT create a swath of destruction 270 feet deep inside the Pentagon.

100% impossible.

To destroy 270 ft deep requires MASS -- 140 tons of aircraft.

Also, the upper floors of the outer ring remained intact. A missile exploding at the outer wall would EXPLODE and blow the upper floors up and away.

That upper floors remained intact proves: NO MISIILE

[bryanwilks000]

remember that there's a fine line between enthusiatism and fanaticism. Don't let this stuff drive you crazy. keep fighting the good fight.

[JonathonMoseley]

Go to the 911Reality website

At that website, you can watch the video interviews and read the statements of HUNDREDS of the THOUSANDS of people who watched the Boeing 767 hit the Pentagon, live, with their own eyeballs, line of sight.

The Pentagon is in a CROWDED urban environment.

It is NOT remote.

Did you know that?

The Pentagon is surrounded by hundreds of thousands of people PLUS AN AIRPORT 1 mile away!

Natl airport WATCHED ON RADAR, genius!

[JonathonMoseley]

Be honest: Your approach is that everyone who was there is wrong and you are right. True?

Go to the 911Reality website. I can't post links here.

But you can find there the American Airlines annual report for 2001.

American Airlines reported to their shareholders that AA lost 2 aircraft on 9/11 -- one inside the Pentagon and one in the WTC.

AA's crash investigators identified the aircraft debris by serial numbers on the parts.

AA ADMITTED LEGAL LIABILITY, saying it was THEIR jet

[Joshi069]

I believe a 757 is only 60 tonnes, not 140, and wouldn't have been flying at 540mph as that is close to their max cruising speed only achieved at altitude and with limited maneuverability.

[JonathonMoseley]

It is very awkard that You Tube does not allow posting URL links.

But go to the Boeing website.

A fully loaded Boeing 757 or 767 (they are extremely similar, and pilot training on one covers the other) is 140 tons.

Many of the HUNDREDS of eyewitnesses who watched Flight 77 smash into the Pentagon reported the very distinct sound of the engines gong to FULL THROTTLE before impact, after a wide circle turn (the hijacker MISSED on the first attempt, & circled around again)

[JonathonMoseley]

However, if you go to 911Reality website, you can read -- and see in video -- the HUNDREDS of eyewitnesses who watched Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, live, in person, with their own eyeballs, line of sight.

The 9/11 Nuts fail to understand that the Pentagon is in an URBAN environment, surrounded by hundreds of thousands of witnesses.

The nuts assume that the Pentagon is in some remote location.

Tens of thousands of people watched Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, and many were recorded

[JonathonMoseley]

As for the main point,, a missile COULD NOT plow a 270 feet long swath INTO a buidling, 90 feet wide.

Only a MASSIVE object could plow through a building 270 feet DEEP INTO a building, 90 feet wide.

A missile packs a punch because it explodes.... but weighs little.. A missile would hit the outside of the Pentagon, and explode RIGHT THERE at the outer wall..

A missile would destroy the upper floors, throwing them up and out.

But the upper floors remained intact.

Ergo, no missile