Charles Krauthammer is the best. Perfect combination of intelligence, common sense and tone. Fred Barnes is great too. The fox all stars crush any trio on any other network.
Not typical. I watch Brit Hume every day and this is not all too common. If you want to watch a lack of political diversity swith to MSNBC, CNN, or ABC. Also try reading the New York Times or the Boston Globe. A couple others good for this are Time and Newsweek.
Chris Wallace clearly speaks enough about the FISA courts to know about them. If he knows that much, he knows that in cases of national security, the Feds can actually search and get a retroactive warrant from FISA. Bush hasn't even tried to get those. The deck is stacked in favor of performing intrusive searches and keeping them legal and Bush still can't stay within the boundaries of the law? These guys know this. They're dodging the issue and distorting the truth.
And the L.A. Times, N.Y. Times, Chicago Tribune, Hollywood and most of academia are completely slanted to the Left. Why should Fox News invite more liberals onto its airwaves when they're already fully employed (and monopolistic) elsewhere? There are nearly as many Socialists and Communists in academia as there are mainstream conservatives.
The Trib is right-leaning. The bias of the NY Times is pro-business with an internationalist streak for global politics. It's left of Bush, but hardly the commies you want to label them. And what does acadamia have to do with this? Are you trying to conjure up anything left to be a liberal bogeyman? Do you really feel this victimized?
Bullshit, the Tribune and NY Time are left, whether you're honest enough to admit it or not. I don't say they're Communist, because they're not. Academia influeces media and that's why I brought them up. I don't feel victimized, I just don't like bullshit-- yours or anyone else's.
I think it would be more accurate calling them communist than liberal. Liberal means free, the commies want more bigger government. I will be waiting for Hillary's plans for collective farms.
BEST NEWS ANALYSIS SHOW ON TELEVISION............PERIOD.
catndryer 10 months ago
charles krauthammer is a genius
carlinj832000 3 years ago 2
Agreed!
1hipster1 3 years ago
yeah really liberals dont who they;re up against! when it comes to krauthammer he will totally destroy them,
carlinj832000 3 years ago 3
KRAUTHAMMER!
TheHonourableJLD 3 years ago 2
Charles Krauthammer is the best. Perfect combination of intelligence, common sense and tone. Fred Barnes is great too. The fox all stars crush any trio on any other network.
aitraining 4 years ago 4
Krauthammer, I know you want hug and kiss Sen. Larry Craig on Fox News today(08/30/07), but you also can't hide it.
elamal2007 4 years ago
Is that all you've got? Do you actually have a point to make or just going to insult Charles?
P.S. Larry Craig is a sick fuck but at least he did fuck a 17 year old like Garry Studds who also got re-elected.
Sparisi1122 4 years ago
Charles Krauthammer is AWESOME!
Sparisi1122 4 years ago 2
Damm right. I can listen to the guy for hours. So smart and so measured. I wish he wrote more books though.
aitraining 4 years ago
Not typical. I watch Brit Hume every day and this is not all too common. If you want to watch a lack of political diversity swith to MSNBC, CNN, or ABC. Also try reading the New York Times or the Boston Globe. A couple others good for this are Time and Newsweek.
Sparisi1122 4 years ago 2
Mort Kondracke is a liberal. He isn't a "conservative parrot".
Thomistic1 5 years ago
Yea what Theo said!
hehe
futurekulture 5 years ago
Chris Wallace clearly speaks enough about the FISA courts to know about them. If he knows that much, he knows that in cases of national security, the Feds can actually search and get a retroactive warrant from FISA. Bush hasn't even tried to get those. The deck is stacked in favor of performing intrusive searches and keeping them legal and Bush still can't stay within the boundaries of the law? These guys know this. They're dodging the issue and distorting the truth.
theominousthey 5 years ago
that's what's so ominous about the NSA program. perhaps it's another tactic in the strategy to establish that the executive is above the law.
miscreant2001 4 years ago
And the L.A. Times, N.Y. Times, Chicago Tribune, Hollywood and most of academia are completely slanted to the Left. Why should Fox News invite more liberals onto its airwaves when they're already fully employed (and monopolistic) elsewhere? There are nearly as many Socialists and Communists in academia as there are mainstream conservatives.
Gerkinstock 5 years ago
The Trib is right-leaning. The bias of the NY Times is pro-business with an internationalist streak for global politics. It's left of Bush, but hardly the commies you want to label them. And what does acadamia have to do with this? Are you trying to conjure up anything left to be a liberal bogeyman? Do you really feel this victimized?
theominousthey 5 years ago
Bullshit, the Tribune and NY Time are left, whether you're honest enough to admit it or not. I don't say they're Communist, because they're not. Academia influeces media and that's why I brought them up. I don't feel victimized, I just don't like bullshit-- yours or anyone else's.
Gerkinstock 5 years ago
I think it would be more accurate calling them communist than liberal. Liberal means free, the commies want more bigger government. I will be waiting for Hillary's plans for collective farms.
Sparisi1122 4 years ago
barnes is insanely conservative, kondracke is relatively moderate, and krauthammer has no neck or lips.
teamwounder 5 years ago
More on this video and others like it at eyesonfox.org.
eyesonfox 5 years ago