@newm123 Hello! I totally agree with you. Besides idiots are liars and scoundrels. Know that they were banned in France for crimes against science. If you want more information just let us know.
To add to my previous two posts. I am amazed that people are willing through blatant ignorance sacrifice their own integrity for the sack of trying to cover up the impossible.
This will come to an end one day and the conspirators will stand accountable, No one gets away with this no matter how big they think they are. I have left plenty of links to further research here on this thread i suggest you do so if you are interested. Just google
@Merlin5by5 Just forget the fact that WTC 7 Was reported collapsed 20 mins before it was brought down. There's even footage of it still standing behind the reporter saying it has collapsed so stop being a fuckwit.
All three buildings collapsed at free fall speed into the path of greatest resistance instead of toppling over mostly pulverised. In Fact Ive done demolition as i'm an unrestricted Rigger but using Gas cutting equipment to bring down structures and these 3 buildings came down neater than any demolition Ive ever seen. I also build steel structure buildings and Ive worked in the mining industry and have good knowledge of metallurgy. TBC
@Stringyheads "neater than any demolition Ive ever seen" one of the building toppled over across the street onto other buildings. I would hate to see any demolition you were involved in.
OK folks let me put this to you. These people who have been name calling and curing me even suggesting that i'm an anti Semite funny that i'm Jew but anyway they have showed a great deal of immaturity which comes as no surprise to me.
They have all accepted the NIST report that initially forgot to mention Building 7 to being with.
But three towers totally collapsed in one day from fire and that has never happend in history even once on a steel structured building. TBC
@Stringyheads "They have all accepted the NIST report" Most of the people that comment certainly have not taken the time to read the NIST report. They just don't believe that the govt and others came together to knock down a building to kill 1000's of people.
@Stringyheads ... FORGET MY OTHER POST....TELL ME YOUR VERSION OF WHAT YOU THINK HAPPEN on 911. You claim things like all 3 building fell at freefall speed (JUST WRONG). So i am not chasing your false claims just for you to launch more false claims. I AM CURIOUS IF YOU BELIEVE THERE ARE ALIENS AT AREA 51 ALSO? since the govt wont let you see into AREA 51 MUST BE HIDING ALIENS.(FROM NOW ON I AM JUST GOING TO COPY AND PASTE THIS COMMENT TO ALL YOUR POST TIL YOU ANSWER IT!!!
Hey Folks go and YouTube search (BP Oil Rig Explosion) Deepwater Horizon and see how uncontrolled fuel fire real effects structural steel. This platform survived above water for well over 12hrs and those flames as you will see are huge compared to the fuel fire of 9/11. Then do a search for 9/11 WTC Building 5 this building had the greatest fire of all the buildings put together but had no reason to collapse as it had nothing to hide and nothing to gain from.
OK let now hit a building with a plane full of fuel and see if collapses in to its own footprint at near freefall speed, This is a joke.
If they really thought that the NIST report was correct the building codes would change and all existing high rise buildings would have to meet a new standard. Why has that not happened especially with all the shadow terrorists around everyone is worried about.
Folks Merlin5by5 worked for the government and has a conflict of interest and a bias opinion.
Hellasow is giving dis info to favor his authority the put options can be found at google
9-11 Research Put Options. Then look into it further go as far as you like and you will see they are specifically related to 9/11 united and American Airlines any way i could go on and talk about alot of things my little troll did not go into, I also as a real Youtube do not Hyjack threads. So Ive given you a lead you will find more to form your own unbiased opinion are you not entitled to that?
@Stringyheads Since you have all this evidence of what happen please start by sharing what you think happened. Stop shooting off a dozen BS points and asking random youtube people that are not experts in any of them to go investigate. Its like asking an auto mechanic about a pain in my chest. If he can't explain something about it, must of been aliens (or maybe the govt) causing the pain.
@Stringyheads Also youtube/google are mainstream sources of info. The govt if it wanted and could pull of widespread conspiracies. You would think the govt could at the very lest make it very unfavorable for youtube/google to let morons like you to even make channels like loose change or even let google searches hit on 911 nutjob hypothesis (really delusions).
@hellasow What happened, Get away from Loose Change and others you've been watching shit. Firstly as it would take more than a book to write the best Documentary you will find that covers way more than this even alone is here on YT (War By Deception Directors Cut full) It goes for over 3hrs but once you start it you will not turn it off. If you can not be bothered then don't bother me. You will then you can make your own opinion + Perception, stop chasing the white rabbit and eating muffintops
@Stringyheads Just for shits and giggles since you are an expert on evreything. Why do builders of steel constructed buildings put fireproofing on the steel if it is impossible for it to fall down because of fire?
@hellasow Yeah we can talk about that, Its funny how Larry silverstein would have had to demolish the WTCs because they had asbestos fire proofing so the whole show was very convenient for him. Plus he got that huge insurance pay out nice ay.
Your way behind the 8 ball go at least try to find out something about 9/11 before you make a fool of your self again.
@Stringyheads How much Did he get in insurance money? How much did it cost him to rebuild the tower? How much did he lose on loss revenue when he was not be able to use the property for 10 years?
@hellasow Why would they fire proof if it would not protect the steel? That was really not a very smart question and shows how much you have seen on the subject also the fact that you bring up Loose Change waking off about missiles that's all BS. Ive given you a link i hope you use it then maybe if you decide to keep your current perception at least you may then ask some good questions.
Ive even watched all the shit ones i have 18 Documentries most are crap.
@Stringyheads Why would they fire proof if it would not protect the steel?.....(and you calling my qustions stupid)..It would protect the steel in many situations where the fireproofing was not blown off from a huge inpact.
It was clearly a team of 100 ninjas using nana thermite technology that only secret race of budist monks from the highest mountins know about...oh and truthers of coarse. What are you people stupid?
Professionals working for millions of $ can do it with few good men like happy little elves through the night with an elevator gee they don't even have to do stairs they just stand on top of the lift. How many lifts in the WTC? Plenty to access all points to charge.
(Dov Zakheim 9/11) This guy had 3.3 Trillion $ unaccounted for. all evidence buried under 9/11, So no explanation needed for tax payers money after that. But you just keep following their army of YouTube denying trolls is you like. I got a philosophy "The more Trolls the more mud i bring up and names"
@Merlin5by5 Hey no need to impress me with your in formed perception based on baise results of someone else results. I simply give people names and leads they will form their own perceptions. Do you think they are not entitled to that. Everybody has seen the Mainstream media side your so keen to protect. People have their own minds your behaviour is good it arouses more suspicion signing out with C4 and RDX
@Merlin5by5 So your position is that you except the full official story that NIST handed out in the report and that this was in no way a demolition of any kind and that there are no suspicious circumstances around the 9/11 event.
@Stringyheads omg put options spiked to like 4000 on 9/11 oh wait were they like 8000 a few times earlier that year? Silverstein Insures 9/11 towers You mean after WTC tower was already bombed once 8 years earlier he actually had insurance on it??? WOW your brain must be really small to think this means anything...
Half arsed powder monkeys with normal explosive that didn't even melt steel like on 9/11. as far as time look up Marvin Bush 9/11 Securecom. How much did National Geographic pay these guys FOX money=Zionist, Jew Money=Blood Money.
Larry Silverstein could cover the cost here alone. Check out what he had to gain or is that other theory everyone is going to deny Larry got the 5 Billion$ out of it all? What about a the Put options 40% up on normal trading against the airlines involved that day.
Please write them all down and just type them in the search box and add the word (full) to get the full documentaries. Everyone's seen the lie now search the truth without any bullshit disappearing planes or aliens all these are fact and don't forget to look at who gained the most that day follow the money.
So if the official 9/11 commission story is correct why haven't they changed the building codes and pulled down or strengthened existing buildings.
You see its not about covering up its about an open and transparent investigation to find out if the codes need changing and as it stands they do. Ive seen bombed buildings in Iraq still standing. Who owns National Geographic Just google it and you will find FOX. Israelis dancing and filming it happen then Israelis diving a van with a mural on it.
They should have used this building to test their jet fuel hypothesis by combusting 1/2 of jet fuel for every ton of steel in the building (same fuel to steel ratio as WTC) to see if the building would implode like the WTC. We could probably silence all the truthers if we did that experiment instead. This only proves that truthers believe that different types of explosives were used and perhaps the explosive workers were non-union and didn't take as many breaks.
who ever believes in the official story is a dumb mother....... as building 7 was pulled down (control demolition) all the towers where controlled. Zionists who own the media are showing you what they want you to know. Unfortunately there are idiots out there who will believe just about anything,
I love how there "truthers" talk about super secret demolition technology that people in the demolition business don't know anything about but of course they know all about that stuff. I think the reason why they still hold to these conspiracy theories is pretty simple - they make a living out of it. They sell books and DVDs and stuff and if they admitted that these theories all crap they would have to find real jobs. It's the same with creationist people. The same business.
@lanmancz While there are alot of good points in it, Its not the best my favorite list is below. I bet you don't even know who is in your American Government. Larry Silverstein (Jew) Made alot of money that day From his 3 Billion$ insurance policy he took out for terrorism 6 weeks prior to the 9/11 attacks, Kindly the Judge Michael Mukasey (Jew) made sure he got it. Dov Zakheim did not have to explain where over 3 Trillion $ went after all traces disappeared in dust and rubble that day.
@Stringyheads Yeah sure, those damn jews. It's all their fault. A giant conspiracy. I has always been. They control all our lives since the dawn of time because they are so evil.
@lanmancz Ive got Jew friends I'm not saying all Jews I'm pointing out that the people involved had alot of deep seeded roots Its alot to do with the Zionist Jews those radical loyalty to Israel and believe me not all Jews are in fact this group is very limited in % but not in power. So not point pulling the racist card im a realist.
@lanmancz I'll add the movie (Enron) to that list of mine below. Believe me the war in Iraq made a few people alot of money yep Tax payers money. Check out Halliburton and KBR then follow the money and look how they wasted it while good men was getting killed. You should not support that headbanger. I gain nothing to piss you off but everything to show you where to look and if you don't then others might. If i can open the eyes of one then that's a good thing. Don't trust your government.
@Stringyheads Check out operation Susannah when Israel Attacked the USS Liberty it was called the Lavon Affair another false flag killing 34 crew and wounding over 170 crew pegged them like ducks in duck season the crew was even waving to the Israeli fighters You will see it in the documentary i mentioned below (Missing Links).But you may not care as you'll never carry a gun. You can see a good article on consortiumnews,com Urging Obama to Stop Rush to War to Iran . Read it.
@RetSquid It might interest you to know that a CD of the twin towers that started at the bottom would be a bad idea because it would likely make the towers topple over like trees and crash on a nearby building since the towers were so tall. However, the CD that we witnessed on 9/11 that started near the top would've been a much better way of doing it. After all, there are MANY possible ways to do a CD, and this would be the best way for very tall buildings.
@RetSquid The reason every other CD starts at the bottom is cuz every other building in history that was brought down by CD was small enough to not pose a threat. If the building is short enough, then there is no reason to worry about the building toppling over. But if it's as tall as the twin towers were, then it's too risky to do it that way and a new form of CD must be utilized. The type of CD that we saw on 9/11 that started at the top is the BEST way to bring down a very tall building.
You know that you are negating the entire reason that YOU have for bringing down the towers? You would WANT the most destruction possible to make the attack look as bad as possible.
But you didn't watch the video I posted, otherwise you would not have posted this. How about you get ONE single CD expert to say that bringing down a tall building from the TOP is the "BEST way to" go? It violates just about every rule that there is for CD's.
Is Brett Blanchard oblivious to reality or just incredibly stupid? How can he possibly say that nobody has found any evidence of a controlled demolition when former BYU physics professor Steven Jones said that he found nano-thermite residue on the dust samples of the WTC? If this isn't evidence of controlled demolition I don't know what is. Terrorists living in Afgahan caves don't have the technology to make super thermite!
@RetSquid To my knowledge, nobody other than Jones has found these dust samples, but that's only because Jones was the only person who made an attempt to analyze the dust samples. However, other people have attempted to analyze the samples, but they can't since the remaining WTC debris is in a hangar at the JFK airport that's off-limits to everyone.
I bet the super thermite is the reason nobody can see the debris in the hangar, and so does Jones.
@ChrisHill991 What makes you think that truthers don't feel sorry for the people who lost loved ones on 9/11? Clearly the idea that 9/11 was an inside job is WAAAAY more depressing than the idea that terrorists did 9/11, so if anything, the truthers feel much worse for the victims than the people who believe the official 9/11 story.
Hey Gage! How exactly were explosive charges placed so that the collapses started exactly where the planes impacted the buildings? Even if your idea was correct, nobody could have predicted the *exact* impact point of the planes. Remember that the second plane went in at ~35 degree angle.
Funny how each time a demonstration is shown debunking their claims they resort to explanations that just keep getting more impossible to even address. Now it's "a high tech nano-thermite was used so sophisticated that demolition teams or engineers or rocket scientist's don't even know exists." Lol Give me a break. See in the field of science, it attracts a lot really geeky eccentric crack pots referred to as quacks. All truther "experts" are quacks.
N.G. is simply lying, listen to this testimony from an expert and judge for your self: look for a video with this title: "Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth"
@jdogg781517 u have been brainwashed: taliban denounced the attacks, said they will launch an investigation and denied OBL is able to carry such sophisticated act: look for this video title: "Taliban denies OBL involvement, CNN, 03:27, 9/11"
@jdogg781517 Thats the dumbest statement i have ever heard: I take responsibility for 9/11!!1 Now what?
Americans should put more trust in the TVs 'experts' and not waste their time in school learning physics, since their textbooks are worse than textbooks from third world countries!
The way the female voiceover refers to "troothers" completely gives it away as plain brainwashing.
Anyone eager to break his or her implanted trauma-based mind control inhibitions, just send me a message...
@RummelsdorfLabs Interesting - can you give me an example of a physics textbook used in an American school that is wore than a textbook from a third world country? Please reply with 1) The name of a physics textbook used in U.S. schools and 2) The name of a superior textbook used in third world countries.
@whilsta I'm sorry, i should have marked that part as sarcasm more clearly.
9/11 can easily be proven to be an inside job by the way the three WTC skyscrapers collapsed: symmetrically, completely, accelerating and through the path of greatest resistance.
You want to learn the truth? Read a book on physics!
@RummelsdorfLabs So why do professers of physics, materials engineers and a mountain of PhDs worldwide completely dispute that statement? Why are you right and they are wrong? In terms of conspiracy, yes it could have happened - here's a perfectly plausible explanation of how - and if you believe that, then my friend you are hopeless. watch?v=T8LdG3qmMj8 (5:29 - 6:40)
@whilsta 1. I postulate that they don't know the evidence and suffer from subconscious peer-pressure.
2. I accept scientific evidence as authority, not vice versa.
I don't care how they did it, how many wargames they needed to cover it up... The fact that the WTC towers had been rigged in advance, and those insider accomplices were not investigated, remains.
Reproduce those collapses under lab conditions (wide margin, without CD), and i'll guarantee you a Nobel Prize in physics! Seriously!
@jdogg781517 Did it ever occur to you that the videos of bin Laden confessing to 9/11 were fake? And did it ever occur to you that if the government blamed bin Laden for 9/11, then bin Laden would make a false confession just so he could trick people into thinking that he was the all-powerful god-human that he wanted people to think he was?
This is a case where a false confession would lead to more power, so it makes sense to think bin Laden would take blame for 9/11.
@jdogg781517 It might interest you to know that in that video where bin Laden allegedly took responsibility for 9/11 he was writing with his right hand. This is a RED FLAG that the video was a forgery because BIN LADEN WAS LEFT HANDED. It's a depressing reality, but those confession tapes were faked, just like how the phone calls by the plane passengers were faked by voice morphing technology.
You truthers are absolute fools. Muslims have given us over 17,000 acts of terror since that fateful day and apparently it's just unheard of that they could or would even want to pull of such an act, according to you. You have your head up your ass, and are complacent. What's in it for you to want to believe this so much? Your hatred of this country? Your hatred of Bush? I could never be friends w/ one of you, you're pathetic.
I don't like Barry Obama, but I don't remember the white house ordering beheadings, or flying planes into the high-rises of other countries. Or planting IED's on the roads of foreign countries, running into crowded markets and exploding themselves, or shooting up Christian funeral processions.
Look, you've been lied to. Odd how most of the fools I run into on Youtube who say things like, 'lol ur dumb,' fit the description themselves pretty well.
@Illumirage Ha. First, go look up Prescott Bush. I know it seems irrelevant, and if I'm a hypocrite then so be it. But I'm still standing by the 'ur dumb' statement if it'll make you research things enough to prove me wrong. I'm confident that if you do enough of the right research, we'll both be the winners. kthxbye
That's the thing, why do you assume I haven't researched things? Also, why do I get a homework assignment when talking with you?
Sweet, a weapons contractor and father of George H.W. Explain to me how that makes people in the white house terrorists? Why are you diverting the blame from ACTUAL terrorists, and basically lending credence to them? Are you a terrorist sympathizer, or just a bleeding heart liberal?
@Illumirage I'm neither, all I am is a human who recieves information and finds certain parts of that information very... interesting. Suspicious would be the right word. If you don't want anymore homework assignments, then answer two simple questions. (one has two parts)
1. Has the government ever lied?
2. Do you trust your government? If you don't, does that mean you're not a patriot?
2. Depends on what you're talking about. On certain things I do, others I don't, especially with Barry in office. Bush wasn't the best ever, but I certainly wouldn't make the jump in asserting that he covertly orchestrated 9/11. It would have leaked long before it would have had the chance to be executed. Too many people would have been in on such a HUGE secret. It would have leaked. Islamic fundamentalists pulled off 9/11.
@Illumirage I see what you mean with it would have leaked. That seems like a very logical morsel of doubt for any conspiracy theorist's claims. But then again, it's also possible that there have been little to no major leakages and the small group of men behind it happen to be exceptional liars, through and through.
What do you think of the Patriot Act and martial law? Also, if you wish to ask me any questions in return feel free to.
You're from Bolivia, why are you so concerned with the goings-on in America? Do Americans constantly ridicule Bolivia's policy to you?
It's fine to have an opinion on other countries, but is Bolivia perfect?
I've noticed so many people on youtube who constantly berate America and Americans while the entire time their country has imperfections of its own, maybe mind your own business first?
@Illumirage I'm actually from South Florida, I must've put a random country in when I made this account. Those questions would be good ones if I was from Bolivia. I wouldn't really call it berating America - this same process is happening in various countries around the world.
@Illumirage so you help cover up the Israelis dancing with lighters and filming it as well as the Israelis in a van with a mural on it of the twin towers and explosives all got locked up and released. Your shit scared of them ya wanker.
Only the liars try to make the truth sound like a bad thing.
So do all buildings need to be pulled and rebuilt to a new building code. 3 steel structures come down in one day and yet never in history had one even come down in total collapse. Grow up.
@Illumirage Right, that explains the Israeli's dancing and taking photos of the Panes hitting the building at a car park, They even claimed they was there to film the event.
What about the Israeli's that was caught with a van full of explosives near the GW Bridge They was all let off the hook Google and YouTube it folks (Mossad with truck of Explosives 9/11) Not to mention the US Gov flew the Bin Laden family out while all fights was grounded,
@Illumirage Your a Racist against Muslims, Acts of terror since that fatal day.
Forget the fact the US has occupied the Middle east for well over a decade and committed many war crimes for the greed of a few and for the Israeli Government.
Just look at it now folks (War for Iran) Israel is pushing this so hard and the UN don't mind they even help with the Israeli agenda for the government overthrow in Syria.GYFS
Wow. you're just full of errors. You can't be racist against Muslims because there are Muslims of every race. Even if you claimed 'bigoted' I wouldn't buy it, because I have a legit problem w/ Islam. 18,444 acts of Islamic terror since that fateful day and apparently, I'm just supposed to shut the fuck up, in your book. How about you do so.
You're a Jew-hater, anti-semite. And have the nerve to call me 'naive. Funny, the word fits you to a T.
@Illumirage Now shall we talk about the USS Liberty and the Lavon Affair just to bring everyone to the realisation of the reality that Israel does not give 2 hoots about The USA. I really have enough room to elaborate on it here but what i will do is put a search suggestion for everyone, The they can look and form their own perceptions.
Please google or YouTube( Levon Affair USS Liberty) You will also see alot more.
@Merlin5by5 Your entitled to your opinion and perception do you think other people are entitled to theirs or should they not look into it themselves if they want?
I'm not going to even entertain your anti Semite garbage, That's a sign of weakness to have to resort to the racist propaganda that you all quickly build when you feel fear.
@Illumirage Naive shallow minded, hmm a simpleton, Quick to form opinion based on other people perceptions and except them as truth. Excepts the Original story even though that has changed a few times. Will be content to live in bondage, Has lack of knowledge with local Affairs so could not confront global affairs.
Afraid to form own opinion, Likes to follow the masses for feeling of security.
Feels the need to support government whether right or wrong, Vain to i might add.
Shitty part is that overwhelming evidence points against your 'point'. You need to seriously reevaluate your thought processes. It's really actually pretty pathetic.
I don't support our gov't right or wrong, I'm one of the biggest critics of our current gov't. Way to assume. You sure are assuming, about a boatload of things about me. Assumption doesn't help your case one bit.
Not to mention you're INCREDIBLY condescending. Of course, just about every truther I've ever run into is.
Hey morons. The burden of proof is on you. Dont expect people who dont agree with you to prove you wrong because you have to first demonstrate your claims. calling this video a hoax withoutproof of that is not evidence its a clear bias showing you have no business talking about this because you have already made up your mind based on false evidence.
@proudfootz Its a fact you read a paper that said there was thermite but that still has not been demonstrated nor did that pass peer-review. Its an article in a journal and not scientific evidence. How do you not get that? I love how you try to act like fire weakening the steel and the building colapsing is impossible when that explaination makes a hell of a lot more sence. Do you really think the building would have just burnt forever without anything happening?
@proudfootz Thats not true at all. It is shown in the videos before the towers fell that the heat was causing the buildings to bow. How dishonest can you be? Do you really think the towers would have just burnt until there was nothing left like a cig? And that fire didnt destroy the charges on the floors that the fire was? But the building fell from those points. It was not like a demo at all. You say somethings a hoax but you cannot demonstrate that. You are just speculating. Hypocrite.
FACT: NIST studied steel samples from WTC - didn't you know even that much? No steel found to have reached critical temperatures. So you're simply wrong on that point.
FACT: Igniting thermite takes *higher* temperatures than produced by office fires. Another false idea of yours fails the test of reality.
FACT: NIST found initiation of demolition began on floors *other* than where impacts hit. Strike three!
@proudfootz There ya go saying you are not dishonest and then lying. The buildings fell from the impact areas and where the buildings were burning watch any video and you can see tha. Thermite doesnt blow tself up does it? The fire didnt burn whatever ignition divices that were on those floors? But the buildings fell from those floos. Stp lying I know you read an article that faile peer-review and just believed it and when shown evidence that refutes you you just say its a hoax. Prove it.
@proudfootz Hey moron I know you think you have some high ground but if, but you are full of it. That paper only was published in a journal and there is no further study done and it failed peer-review. You think all a scienist has to do is publish paper in a journal? You have to be a moron. Sorry thats not how science works. There is no evidence of thermit. I love the lies youpeople tll like the photos ofsteel beams you say were cut buy thermite but they were not an that been proven. Liars
FACT: You lied *again" about this peer reviewed scientific paper. Shame on you!
So it seems you are the one here who prefers to lie instead of presenting evidence - as scientists do when they publish their research in science journals.
Your childish resort to name-calling really says all there is to say about your approach to rational thought: you're against it.
@proudfootz No I did not lie moron and yesI am calling you a moron because tha is what you are.You are claiming all your work is done and that a paper published in a scientific journal is all your side needed to do. Sorry kid but thats not science you have to still demonstrate the claims which they have failed to do. I dont know who lied to you but publishing a paper is not it pall. There is much more to science ten publishing a paper expecially when it failed peer-review. Sorry kid.
@proudfootz No you keep lying and dont understand that there is more to science then publishing a paper in a journal and thats all you keep talking about and you obviously dont know that is has to be demonstrable as well were any1 could repeat their experiment. When other scintist looked at there study they found it was incorrect nd failed peer-review. Sorry but any1 can publish a paper in a journal. You really dont understand the peer-review process do you? What you think some1 just reads it?
@proudfootz I do not oppose scientific publishings but I do understand there is more to science the publish a paper in a journal. That is not the same as presenting the information in a scientific forum that is open to debate and winning a scientific consensus. There is a reason why your side has not attempted to do that once. It is because they would lose. I'm not lying to you. Some of the best scientist have mentioned exactly what I am telling you.
@proudfootz Duh, no it isnt moron. HAHAHAHAHA. You are really not very intellignet at all. You dont really know anything about that paper and the people who wrote it do you? HAHAHAHAHA. No it didnt kid. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
@proudfootz Really? What can you tell bou me then? SO now you are a phsyco analist? What degrees do you hold? I can tell much about you y your lies andcomplet ignorane. You believe in something that has been disproved. It was also dishonest which can be proven and there is evidence for that. How can you be so dishonest and willfully ignorant?
You keep claiming without evidence harrit's work has been 'disproved' or somehow got published in a peer reviewed journal after supposedly failing peer review.
Since you believe these things without proof, it must be a psychological block.
@proudfootz Wow you are really a stupid hypocrite. Your position is faith based moron. This nat geo proves you wrong and the paper and you are too stupid to understand that you also have a problem with making fallacious statements. I never said that scientist dont publish works in journals and you keep saying lies. I said thats not all they do and you know nothing about the scientific process and you shouldnt be talking about something you know nothing about.
@proudfootz You keep pointing to your joke of evidence as proof hat refutes actually sietifc evidence. Sorry but you need to tell me where you went to college and what degrees you hold and then I will call up that school and tell them they failed to teach you the basic scientific method. Sorry but you still miss the very important point that the paper you keep siting is not fact and was written by morons for morons. You keep claiming that nat geo is wrong well prove and use more then 1 reference
No, it is National Geographic's presentation which is a joke.
You haven't told anybody about your college degrees or which scholls you attend. No reason for anyone to give you information when you are ashamed of your own inability to achieve any academic distinction.
Harrit is a respected scientist - so you're just calling him a 'moron' because he's way more qualified than you will ever be? Sad.
@proudfootz For some1 who likes to make fallacious statement about other English and grammar skills you seem to make quite a bit of mistakes. Its schools not scholls. You also never asked me so acting like I am trying to keep it a secret is a joke. I did however ask you and you seem to not want to talk about that subject. "you are ashamed of your own inability to achieve any academic distinction.", are you kidding me? And you say I fail? Your logic is as childish as your comments.
Apparently 'fallacious' appeared on your word-a-day calendar. Nice to see you're trying to improve your language skills - sad to see you're not very good at it.
You 'deamnd' to see the credentials of others, yet are unwilling to provide your own.
Either you're afraid to do so, or just a plain and simple hypocrite.
But Harrit is an internationally known and respected man of science.
No reason to accept the word of a troll like you over this accomplished professional.
@proudfootz "Apparently 'fallacious' appeared on your word-a-day calendar. Nice to see you're trying to improve your language skills - sad to see you're not very good at it.". Damn you are dishonest. I used the word fallacious because all your statements are fallacious and youhave no place talking about my Langage skills when you cannot comment without making a fallacious statement. I also never said Iwas afraid to show my credentials and that is a lie.
@proudfootz You have been asked by me and other and have not demonstrated anything but you want to lie and act like I am scared? How dishonest can you be? "But Harrit is an internationally known and respected man of science.". Another lie you tell because Harrit is not respected, nor has Harrit demonstrated a single shred of what has been claimed. You lost and are too stupid to understand that. Go lie to someone else moron. You just say silly shit only you believe. Good job retard.
@proudfootz "Harrit is a respected scientist - so you're just calling him a 'moron' because he's way more qualified than you will ever be". Must not be very respected since Harrit's view has been disproved by respected scientist and the majority of all scientist, and I am talking about the most respected scientist as well, no not share your's and Harrit's view. Also you are now claiming to be able to see the future. How do you know what qualifications I currently and eventually will have?
@proudfootz You are just making more fallacious statements showing that you need to go to college because you are acting like a child with his fingers in his ears going nanananananananananana I'm right your wrong nnananananananananana. Grow up and educate yourself. You still havent mentioned why other scientist have to argue their points and win scientific consensus before their material is excepted and your side doesnt have to do that? You know nothing about science and your comments show that.
Sorry you hate the idea of scientists publishing their findings in science journals for all the scientific community to consider.
But I guess the real world is going to continue to be a problem for you since Harrit is doing what all other scientists do - study phenomenon and publish the findings.
@proudfootz The only thing you keep demonsrating is that you couldnt pass a college class. One, you always need more then 1 source. Two, your sources have to be credible which yours are not. Three, you use only fallacious statements whilre you write showing that you havethe mentality of a child.
You really need to grow up and get an educaton beore its too late old man.
@proudfootz The manner in which the paper was published was decietful. You dont get to pick who peer-reviews your work. You kee making fallacious statements that just waste time. You fail to acknowledge any point I have made and instead act like a child with you fingers in your ears. You came up with this all based on a shitty paper published by morons which has been shown to be se. You know this and just want to keep lying to people who dishonest moron.
@proudfootz Ask someone from whatever university you wish that works in the science department and ask them if posting a paper in a scientific journal is the same as presenting information and showing repeatable experiments that any scientist could repeat and argue for a scientific consensus and win. Ask a scientist that question and see what they tell you. Sorry but your side refuses to present anything in a scientific forum open to debate just like creationist.
@proudfootz I'm not trying to do anything but make fun of you for being a moron. Sorry if you stil cant understand this. I know why the paper you speak of is useless and I just love hearing you lie. Thermite was never found in the WTC rubble. You want to twist shit around and lie and so its a fact they found it but thats not true at all liar. Also that paper was not peer-reviewed before it was published and failed peer-review after it had been.
@proudfootz I love watching the asshole who lied to you handle the so called sample and contaminates it the entire time showing hes a poor scientist. Also you dont know anything about scienc and al you have done is expressed your lack of itelligence and your biased bile that just makes you look foolish. Get an education moron.Seriously I'm right and you are wrong. Call up a scientist and ask moron. Or are you to lazy like all truthers who want o claim truth without doing any real work. Lazy liar
@proudfootz Are you kidding me? There is a video of the moron improperly handling the material. You keep lying and lying and lying. No, scientist dont just publish papers in journals especially when they cannot provide sufficient evidence to win a scientific consensus like your side has. Ok, a paper was published but do you know what the next step is? My use of the word moron when referring to you is correct.
@proudfootz WHy was there only four papers published that journal which you claim to be credible in the year 2009? Your logic is childish. You seriously dont know anything about this and just believed it based on a video or that joke of a paper which does not count as fact because they have no tried to demonstrate this in a non-biased academic forum. Sorry but you fail every time you speak.
@proudfootz No thats shpwing that the journal isnt a very good one and the fact that you do not get that shows your ignorance. You are the one with the faith position because there is no proof and you still believe it. Grow up.
@proudfootz You keep saying things that you are guilty of. Your view is faith based and mine is a disbelief in your view. Sorry you cannot understand that.
@proudfootz I never said ave no credible reason to doubt the findings in the paper, but there is a ton of evidence to refute that paper and the very nature of that paper is dishonest and only the credulous could believe it. You keep saying my position is faith based but your is you hypocrite. You think you can refute facts with that joke of a paper? You hveto be the ost ignorant person I have talked in a while. You claim things are a hoax based on this? You moron.
@proudfootz You keep missing my point that scientist do more then just publishing papers. I demonstrated that fact. Every scientist have to win a scientific consensus to hve their work taken seriously. You need to understand this moron. Now Why do you seem to refuse to acknowledge this point and instead make fallacious statements showing you cant understand simple English? Take some science courses. Science isnt faith based moron if something con be demonstrated you have to except it. Moron
Folks if you want the real deal see a 2 Part documentary here of YT search (Power of the Purse) I rest mt case.
Stringyheads 6 days ago
Truthers = Idiots :)
newm123 1 week ago
@newm123 Hello! I totally agree with you. Besides idiots are liars and scoundrels. Know that they were banned in France for crimes against science. If you want more information just let us know.
aczjbr 6 days ago
To add to my previous two posts. I am amazed that people are willing through blatant ignorance sacrifice their own integrity for the sack of trying to cover up the impossible.
This will come to an end one day and the conspirators will stand accountable, No one gets away with this no matter how big they think they are. I have left plenty of links to further research here on this thread i suggest you do so if you are interested. Just google
(9/11 Research Inside Trading) follow the money.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads
Gee, Jethro Bodine, when did the NIST and FEMA, and FBI propose
an impossible explanation? EVERYTHING they claim is documented
at LEAST three ways, from the airliners, their flightpath, their hijackers,
to the fuel, and it's temps and effect on the building. All Documented.
Now, Hologram airliners, Virus Sized explosives, Disappearing airliners,
Invisible Airliner shootdowns, and NWO Ninjas planting explosives,
NOW THAT is impossible, improbable, and unproven. HUH?
Merlin5by5 1 week ago
@Merlin5by5 Just forget the fact that WTC 7 Was reported collapsed 20 mins before it was brought down. There's even footage of it still standing behind the reporter saying it has collapsed so stop being a fuckwit.
Stringyheads 6 days ago
@Stringyheads
SURE, why not? It's NOT like it was a mystery the building would
collapse, it was announced on TV that it was going to collapse!
IF one brit reporter got the order of events wrong, it's NOT a surprise.
ASHLEIGH BANFIELD, MSNBC, told her audience WTC 7 was going
to be the NEXT to fall nearly 20 minutes before it did, and firefighters
predicted it before that. /watch?v=WnYBX6QT0R4&feature=related
Merlin5by5 5 days ago
to add to my previous post.
All three buildings collapsed at free fall speed into the path of greatest resistance instead of toppling over mostly pulverised. In Fact Ive done demolition as i'm an unrestricted Rigger but using Gas cutting equipment to bring down structures and these 3 buildings came down neater than any demolition Ive ever seen. I also build steel structure buildings and Ive worked in the mining industry and have good knowledge of metallurgy. TBC
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads "neater than any demolition Ive ever seen" one of the building toppled over across the street onto other buildings. I would hate to see any demolition you were involved in.
hellasow 1 week ago
OK folks let me put this to you. These people who have been name calling and curing me even suggesting that i'm an anti Semite funny that i'm Jew but anyway they have showed a great deal of immaturity which comes as no surprise to me.
They have all accepted the NIST report that initially forgot to mention Building 7 to being with.
But three towers totally collapsed in one day from fire and that has never happend in history even once on a steel structured building. TBC
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads "They have all accepted the NIST report" Most of the people that comment certainly have not taken the time to read the NIST report. They just don't believe that the govt and others came together to knock down a building to kill 1000's of people.
hellasow 1 week ago
@Stringyheads ... FORGET MY OTHER POST....TELL ME YOUR VERSION OF WHAT YOU THINK HAPPEN on 911. You claim things like all 3 building fell at freefall speed (JUST WRONG). So i am not chasing your false claims just for you to launch more false claims. I AM CURIOUS IF YOU BELIEVE THERE ARE ALIENS AT AREA 51 ALSO? since the govt wont let you see into AREA 51 MUST BE HIDING ALIENS.(FROM NOW ON I AM JUST GOING TO COPY AND PASTE THIS COMMENT TO ALL YOUR POST TIL YOU ANSWER IT!!!
hellasow 1 week ago
Hey Folks go and YouTube search (BP Oil Rig Explosion) Deepwater Horizon and see how uncontrolled fuel fire real effects structural steel. This platform survived above water for well over 12hrs and those flames as you will see are huge compared to the fuel fire of 9/11. Then do a search for 9/11 WTC Building 5 this building had the greatest fire of all the buildings put together but had no reason to collapse as it had nothing to hide and nothing to gain from.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads Did a plane damage the structure?
hellasow 1 week ago
OK let now hit a building with a plane full of fuel and see if collapses in to its own footprint at near freefall speed, This is a joke.
If they really thought that the NIST report was correct the building codes would change and all existing high rise buildings would have to meet a new standard. Why has that not happened especially with all the shadow terrorists around everyone is worried about.
Folks Merlin5by5 worked for the government and has a conflict of interest and a bias opinion.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
Hellasow is giving dis info to favor his authority the put options can be found at google
9-11 Research Put Options. Then look into it further go as far as you like and you will see they are specifically related to 9/11 united and American Airlines any way i could go on and talk about alot of things my little troll did not go into, I also as a real Youtube do not Hyjack threads. So Ive given you a lead you will find more to form your own unbiased opinion are you not entitled to that?
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads Since you have all this evidence of what happen please start by sharing what you think happened. Stop shooting off a dozen BS points and asking random youtube people that are not experts in any of them to go investigate. Its like asking an auto mechanic about a pain in my chest. If he can't explain something about it, must of been aliens (or maybe the govt) causing the pain.
hellasow 1 week ago
@Stringyheads Also youtube/google are mainstream sources of info. The govt if it wanted and could pull of widespread conspiracies. You would think the govt could at the very lest make it very unfavorable for youtube/google to let morons like you to even make channels like loose change or even let google searches hit on 911 nutjob hypothesis (really delusions).
hellasow 1 week ago
@hellasow What happened, Get away from Loose Change and others you've been watching shit. Firstly as it would take more than a book to write the best Documentary you will find that covers way more than this even alone is here on YT (War By Deception Directors Cut full) It goes for over 3hrs but once you start it you will not turn it off. If you can not be bothered then don't bother me. You will then you can make your own opinion + Perception, stop chasing the white rabbit and eating muffintops
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads Just for shits and giggles since you are an expert on evreything. Why do builders of steel constructed buildings put fireproofing on the steel if it is impossible for it to fall down because of fire?
hellasow 1 week ago
@hellasow Yeah we can talk about that, Its funny how Larry silverstein would have had to demolish the WTCs because they had asbestos fire proofing so the whole show was very convenient for him. Plus he got that huge insurance pay out nice ay.
Your way behind the 8 ball go at least try to find out something about 9/11 before you make a fool of your self again.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads How much Did he get in insurance money? How much did it cost him to rebuild the tower? How much did he lose on loss revenue when he was not be able to use the property for 10 years?
hellasow 1 week ago
@hellasow Why would they fire proof if it would not protect the steel? That was really not a very smart question and shows how much you have seen on the subject also the fact that you bring up Loose Change waking off about missiles that's all BS. Ive given you a link i hope you use it then maybe if you decide to keep your current perception at least you may then ask some good questions.
Ive even watched all the shit ones i have 18 Documentries most are crap.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Stringyheads Why would they fire proof if it would not protect the steel?.....(and you calling my qustions stupid)..It would protect the steel in many situations where the fireproofing was not blown off from a huge inpact.
hellasow 1 week ago
It was clearly a team of 100 ninjas using nana thermite technology that only secret race of budist monks from the highest mountins know about...oh and truthers of coarse. What are you people stupid?
hellasow 1 week ago
Professionals working for millions of $ can do it with few good men like happy little elves through the night with an elevator gee they don't even have to do stairs they just stand on top of the lift. How many lifts in the WTC? Plenty to access all points to charge.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@Stringyheads
LMAO, the only idiots that believe the Jews are the evil in the world,
are usually the white trash getting ass fucked in prison for the Aryan
nation. Stormfront, and people like Dr. Allen Sabrowski are the
biggest losers on earth, not to mention the usual brown shirt
white supremacy nazi wannabes. They usually confess their homo
erotic fantasies just before they die. It's the black leather, lol.
Merlin5by5 1 month ago
Search (Bush Prior knowledge 9/11)
Stringyheads 1 month ago
Don't follow the bullshit, Follow the money.
Search
(Put options inside trading on 9/11 Airlines)
(Larry Silverstein Insures 9/11 towers)
(Marvin Bush Securacom)
(Dov Zakheim 9/11) This guy had 3.3 Trillion $ unaccounted for. all evidence buried under 9/11, So no explanation needed for tax payers money after that. But you just keep following their army of YouTube denying trolls is you like. I got a philosophy "The more Trolls the more mud i bring up and names"
Search (Who gained from 911)
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@Stringyheads
By the way, Marvin Bush was at the WTC 2 years before 2001.
He was simply the account representative. He shook hands,
signed the contract and left. He left Securacom about 18 months
before Sept 11, 2001. Dov Zahheim fails to mention that the
3.2 trillion NEVER was missing money. It was always incompatible
accounting systems, MORON. Donald Rumsfeld did that Sept. 10.
DON RUMSFELD, INCOMPATIBLE ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS,
defense. gov/ speeches/ speech. aspx? speechid=430
Merlin5by5 1 month ago
@Merlin5by5 Hey no need to impress me with your in formed perception based on baise results of someone else results. I simply give people names and leads they will form their own perceptions. Do you think they are not entitled to that. Everybody has seen the Mainstream media side your so keen to protect. People have their own minds your behaviour is good it arouses more suspicion signing out with C4 and RDX
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads
NOT trying to impress you, I am just laughing at an idiot, backpedaling
from his Jethro Bodine education and physics, to try to preserve a
giant international conspiracy that you learned about on the Internet.
Nobody is defending the mainstream media, but they are OBVIOUSLY
better than little conspiracy ghetto websites. They publish in PUBLIC.
UNLIKE YOU, I have actually used both C-4 and RDX.
NEITHER is possible at the WTC. BOTH LEAVE EVIDENCE that
you don't have.
Merlin5by5 1 week ago
@Merlin5by5 You don't impress me.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads
I am NOT trying to impress you. JUST trying to demonstrate your stupidity.
That's YOUR freedom to speak, and this is MINE.
See how that works?
Merlin5by5 1 week ago
@Merlin5by5 So your position is that you except the full official story that NIST handed out in the report and that this was in no way a demolition of any kind and that there are no suspicious circumstances around the 9/11 event.
Therefore no further investigation is required?
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Merlin5by5 Go plug your RCS and reboot
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads omg put options spiked to like 4000 on 9/11 oh wait were they like 8000 a few times earlier that year? Silverstein Insures 9/11 towers You mean after WTC tower was already bombed once 8 years earlier he actually had insurance on it??? WOW your brain must be really small to think this means anything...
hellasow 1 week ago
@hellasow Thanks for bringing me back my little troll
Stringyheads 1 week ago
Half arsed powder monkeys with normal explosive that didn't even melt steel like on 9/11. as far as time look up Marvin Bush 9/11 Securecom. How much did National Geographic pay these guys FOX money=Zionist, Jew Money=Blood Money.
Larry Silverstein could cover the cost here alone. Check out what he had to gain or is that other theory everyone is going to deny Larry got the 5 Billion$ out of it all? What about a the Put options 40% up on normal trading against the airlines involved that day.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
The towers Did not come down like that they come down heaps cleaner and didn't tilt at all. So not even a Demo team can get it as good, Says it all.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
Watch these, Search
1> Blueprint for truth.
2>Zero an investigation in to 9/11.
3>Explosive evidence.
4>Missing Links 9/11.
5>War By Deception The Directors Cut.
6>The Money Masters.
Please write them all down and just type them in the search box and add the word (full) to get the full documentaries. Everyone's seen the lie now search the truth without any bullshit disappearing planes or aliens all these are fact and don't forget to look at who gained the most that day follow the money.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
So if the official 9/11 commission story is correct why haven't they changed the building codes and pulled down or strengthened existing buildings.
You see its not about covering up its about an open and transparent investigation to find out if the codes need changing and as it stands they do. Ive seen bombed buildings in Iraq still standing. Who owns National Geographic Just google it and you will find FOX. Israelis dancing and filming it happen then Israelis diving a van with a mural on it.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
They should have used this building to test their jet fuel hypothesis by combusting 1/2 of jet fuel for every ton of steel in the building (same fuel to steel ratio as WTC) to see if the building would implode like the WTC. We could probably silence all the truthers if we did that experiment instead. This only proves that truthers believe that different types of explosives were used and perhaps the explosive workers were non-union and didn't take as many breaks.
HopyHop1 2 months ago
who ever believes in the official story is a dumb mother....... as building 7 was pulled down (control demolition) all the towers where controlled. Zionists who own the media are showing you what they want you to know. Unfortunately there are idiots out there who will believe just about anything,
guidedfox 2 months ago
I love how there "truthers" talk about super secret demolition technology that people in the demolition business don't know anything about but of course they know all about that stuff. I think the reason why they still hold to these conspiracy theories is pretty simple - they make a living out of it. They sell books and DVDs and stuff and if they admitted that these theories all crap they would have to find real jobs. It's the same with creationist people. The same business.
lanmancz 3 months ago
@lanmancz Ive done Demolition and your full of shit.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@Stringyheads Go and buy a Loose Change DVD.
lanmancz 1 month ago
@lanmancz While there are alot of good points in it, Its not the best my favorite list is below. I bet you don't even know who is in your American Government. Larry Silverstein (Jew) Made alot of money that day From his 3 Billion$ insurance policy he took out for terrorism 6 weeks prior to the 9/11 attacks, Kindly the Judge Michael Mukasey (Jew) made sure he got it. Dov Zakheim did not have to explain where over 3 Trillion $ went after all traces disappeared in dust and rubble that day.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@Stringyheads Yeah sure, those damn jews. It's all their fault. A giant conspiracy. I has always been. They control all our lives since the dawn of time because they are so evil.
lanmancz 1 month ago
@lanmancz Ive got Jew friends I'm not saying all Jews I'm pointing out that the people involved had alot of deep seeded roots Its alot to do with the Zionist Jews those radical loyalty to Israel and believe me not all Jews are in fact this group is very limited in % but not in power. So not point pulling the racist card im a realist.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@lanmancz I'll add the movie (Enron) to that list of mine below. Believe me the war in Iraq made a few people alot of money yep Tax payers money. Check out Halliburton and KBR then follow the money and look how they wasted it while good men was getting killed. You should not support that headbanger. I gain nothing to piss you off but everything to show you where to look and if you don't then others might. If i can open the eyes of one then that's a good thing. Don't trust your government.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@lanmancz Being a Headbanger you should like (War By Deception Directors Cut)
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@Stringyheads Check out operation Susannah when Israel Attacked the USS Liberty it was called the Lavon Affair another false flag killing 34 crew and wounding over 170 crew pegged them like ducks in duck season the crew was even waving to the Israeli fighters You will see it in the documentary i mentioned below (Missing Links).But you may not care as you'll never carry a gun. You can see a good article on consortiumnews,com Urging Obama to Stop Rush to War to Iran . Read it.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
I'll start to believe in a CD when someone posts a video of a CD that starts at the top and doesn't blow out anything, anywhere.
RetSquid 4 months ago
@RetSquid It might interest you to know that a CD of the twin towers that started at the bottom would be a bad idea because it would likely make the towers topple over like trees and crash on a nearby building since the towers were so tall. However, the CD that we witnessed on 9/11 that started near the top would've been a much better way of doing it. After all, there are MANY possible ways to do a CD, and this would be the best way for very tall buildings.
fanof2012 4 months ago
@fanof2012
"it would likely make the towers topple over"
Really? Then WHY is it that every other CD in a city starts at the bottom?
Can you show a SINGLE CD that starts at the top?
RetSquid 4 months ago
@RetSquid The reason every other CD starts at the bottom is cuz every other building in history that was brought down by CD was small enough to not pose a threat. If the building is short enough, then there is no reason to worry about the building toppling over. But if it's as tall as the twin towers were, then it's too risky to do it that way and a new form of CD must be utilized. The type of CD that we saw on 9/11 that started at the top is the BEST way to bring down a very tall building.
fanof2012 4 months ago
@fanof2012
You know that you are negating the entire reason that YOU have for bringing down the towers? You would WANT the most destruction possible to make the attack look as bad as possible.
But you didn't watch the video I posted, otherwise you would not have posted this. How about you get ONE single CD expert to say that bringing down a tall building from the TOP is the "BEST way to" go? It violates just about every rule that there is for CD's.
RetSquid 4 months ago
@fanof2012
7Ng5qwtR59A
So they did this one WRONG?
RetSquid 4 months ago
he lost me when he mention nano thermite
doucheful80 4 months ago
Is Brett Blanchard oblivious to reality or just incredibly stupid? How can he possibly say that nobody has found any evidence of a controlled demolition when former BYU physics professor Steven Jones said that he found nano-thermite residue on the dust samples of the WTC? If this isn't evidence of controlled demolition I don't know what is. Terrorists living in Afgahan caves don't have the technology to make super thermite!
fanof2012 4 months ago
@fanof2012
"Steven Jones said that he found nano-thermite residue on the dust "
Who else saw this evidence AND saw it gathered at the WTC?
RetSquid 4 months ago
@RetSquid To my knowledge, nobody other than Jones has found these dust samples, but that's only because Jones was the only person who made an attempt to analyze the dust samples. However, other people have attempted to analyze the samples, but they can't since the remaining WTC debris is in a hangar at the JFK airport that's off-limits to everyone.
I bet the super thermite is the reason nobody can see the debris in the hangar, and so does Jones.
fanof2012 4 months ago
@fanof2012
If I said I have absolute, 100% proof that he was right, but only I have the proof, would you believe me?
If I said I have absolute, 100% proof that he was wrong, but only I have the proof, would you believe me?
RetSquid 4 months ago
9/11 Truthers are CON ARTIST profiting off of those that died that day. Its disgusting
ChrisHill991 5 months ago
@ChrisHill991 What makes you think that truthers don't feel sorry for the people who lost loved ones on 9/11? Clearly the idea that 9/11 was an inside job is WAAAAY more depressing than the idea that terrorists did 9/11, so if anything, the truthers feel much worse for the victims than the people who believe the official 9/11 story.
fanof2012 4 months ago
Hey Gage! How exactly were explosive charges placed so that the collapses started exactly where the planes impacted the buildings? Even if your idea was correct, nobody could have predicted the *exact* impact point of the planes. Remember that the second plane went in at ~35 degree angle.
Show your work.
NonnyMus1 5 months ago
Funny how each time a demonstration is shown debunking their claims they resort to explanations that just keep getting more impossible to even address. Now it's "a high tech nano-thermite was used so sophisticated that demolition teams or engineers or rocket scientist's don't even know exists." Lol Give me a break. See in the field of science, it attracts a lot really geeky eccentric crack pots referred to as quacks. All truther "experts" are quacks.
WallStwizkid 5 months ago
N.G. is simply lying, listen to this testimony from an expert and judge for your self: look for a video with this title: "Tom Sullivan - Explosives Technician - Loader - AE911Truth"
mbarnabeus 5 months ago
Why do truthers hate the truth?
A51isHidden 6 months ago
Al-Qaeda and members of the taliban took responsibility for 9/11. so there is no argument....
jdogg781517 6 months ago
@jdogg781517 they took responsabilliy, but no one said they did it for sure, and if they did, they didnt do it alone..
angelus0dispear 5 months ago
@jdogg781517 u have been brainwashed: taliban denounced the attacks, said they will launch an investigation and denied OBL is able to carry such sophisticated act: look for this video title: "Taliban denies OBL involvement, CNN, 03:27, 9/11"
mbarnabeus 5 months ago
@jdogg781517 Thats the dumbest statement i have ever heard: I take responsibility for 9/11!!1 Now what?
Americans should put more trust in the TVs 'experts' and not waste their time in school learning physics, since their textbooks are worse than textbooks from third world countries!
The way the female voiceover refers to "troothers" completely gives it away as plain brainwashing.
Anyone eager to break his or her implanted trauma-based mind control inhibitions, just send me a message...
RummelsdorfLabs 5 months ago
@RummelsdorfLabs Interesting - can you give me an example of a physics textbook used in an American school that is wore than a textbook from a third world country? Please reply with 1) The name of a physics textbook used in U.S. schools and 2) The name of a superior textbook used in third world countries.
whilsta 3 months ago
@whilsta I'm sorry, i should have marked that part as sarcasm more clearly.
9/11 can easily be proven to be an inside job by the way the three WTC skyscrapers collapsed: symmetrically, completely, accelerating and through the path of greatest resistance.
You want to learn the truth? Read a book on physics!
RummelsdorfLabs 3 months ago
@RummelsdorfLabs So why do professers of physics, materials engineers and a mountain of PhDs worldwide completely dispute that statement? Why are you right and they are wrong? In terms of conspiracy, yes it could have happened - here's a perfectly plausible explanation of how - and if you believe that, then my friend you are hopeless. watch?v=T8LdG3qmMj8 (5:29 - 6:40)
whilsta 3 months ago
@whilsta 1. I postulate that they don't know the evidence and suffer from subconscious peer-pressure.
2. I accept scientific evidence as authority, not vice versa.
I don't care how they did it, how many wargames they needed to cover it up... The fact that the WTC towers had been rigged in advance, and those insider accomplices were not investigated, remains.
Reproduce those collapses under lab conditions (wide margin, without CD), and i'll guarantee you a Nobel Prize in physics! Seriously!
RummelsdorfLabs 3 months ago
@jdogg781517 Did it ever occur to you that the videos of bin Laden confessing to 9/11 were fake? And did it ever occur to you that if the government blamed bin Laden for 9/11, then bin Laden would make a false confession just so he could trick people into thinking that he was the all-powerful god-human that he wanted people to think he was?
This is a case where a false confession would lead to more power, so it makes sense to think bin Laden would take blame for 9/11.
fanof2012 4 months ago
@jdogg781517 It might interest you to know that in that video where bin Laden allegedly took responsibility for 9/11 he was writing with his right hand. This is a RED FLAG that the video was a forgery because BIN LADEN WAS LEFT HANDED. It's a depressing reality, but those confession tapes were faked, just like how the phone calls by the plane passengers were faked by voice morphing technology.
fanof2012 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fanof2012
"he was writing with his right hand."
You might want to watch that video again, he doesn't even have anything in his hands, nor does he write anything.
K0xgGSmfVek
RetSquid 4 months ago
You truthers are absolute fools. Muslims have given us over 17,000 acts of terror since that fateful day and apparently it's just unheard of that they could or would even want to pull of such an act, according to you. You have your head up your ass, and are complacent. What's in it for you to want to believe this so much? Your hatred of this country? Your hatred of Bush? I could never be friends w/ one of you, you're pathetic.
Illumirage 7 months ago 9
@Illumirage lol ur dumb. the terrorists are in the white house silly goose. lmao.
Rememberthename8 6 months ago
@Rememberthename8
I don't like Barry Obama, but I don't remember the white house ordering beheadings, or flying planes into the high-rises of other countries. Or planting IED's on the roads of foreign countries, running into crowded markets and exploding themselves, or shooting up Christian funeral processions.
Look, you've been lied to. Odd how most of the fools I run into on Youtube who say things like, 'lol ur dumb,' fit the description themselves pretty well.
Hypocrite, fuck off.
Illumirage 6 months ago
@Illumirage Ha. First, go look up Prescott Bush. I know it seems irrelevant, and if I'm a hypocrite then so be it. But I'm still standing by the 'ur dumb' statement if it'll make you research things enough to prove me wrong. I'm confident that if you do enough of the right research, we'll both be the winners. kthxbye
Rememberthename8 6 months ago
@Rememberthename8
That's the thing, why do you assume I haven't researched things? Also, why do I get a homework assignment when talking with you?
Sweet, a weapons contractor and father of George H.W. Explain to me how that makes people in the white house terrorists? Why are you diverting the blame from ACTUAL terrorists, and basically lending credence to them? Are you a terrorist sympathizer, or just a bleeding heart liberal?
Illumirage 6 months ago
@Illumirage I'm neither, all I am is a human who recieves information and finds certain parts of that information very... interesting. Suspicious would be the right word. If you don't want anymore homework assignments, then answer two simple questions. (one has two parts)
1. Has the government ever lied?
2. Do you trust your government? If you don't, does that mean you're not a patriot?
thanks.
Rememberthename8 6 months ago
@Rememberthename8
1. Yes.
2. Depends on what you're talking about. On certain things I do, others I don't, especially with Barry in office. Bush wasn't the best ever, but I certainly wouldn't make the jump in asserting that he covertly orchestrated 9/11. It would have leaked long before it would have had the chance to be executed. Too many people would have been in on such a HUGE secret. It would have leaked. Islamic fundamentalists pulled off 9/11.
Illumirage 6 months ago
@Illumirage I see what you mean with it would have leaked. That seems like a very logical morsel of doubt for any conspiracy theorist's claims. But then again, it's also possible that there have been little to no major leakages and the small group of men behind it happen to be exceptional liars, through and through.
What do you think of the Patriot Act and martial law? Also, if you wish to ask me any questions in return feel free to.
Rememberthename8 6 months ago
@Rememberthename8
The latter sounds far fetched.
I have a couple...
You're from Bolivia, why are you so concerned with the goings-on in America? Do Americans constantly ridicule Bolivia's policy to you?
It's fine to have an opinion on other countries, but is Bolivia perfect?
I've noticed so many people on youtube who constantly berate America and Americans while the entire time their country has imperfections of its own, maybe mind your own business first?
Illumirage 6 months ago
@Illumirage I'm actually from South Florida, I must've put a random country in when I made this account. Those questions would be good ones if I was from Bolivia. I wouldn't really call it berating America - this same process is happening in various countries around the world.
Rememberthename8 6 months ago
@Illumirage so you help cover up the Israelis dancing with lighters and filming it as well as the Israelis in a van with a mural on it of the twin towers and explosives all got locked up and released. Your shit scared of them ya wanker.
Only the liars try to make the truth sound like a bad thing.
So do all buildings need to be pulled and rebuilt to a new building code. 3 steel structures come down in one day and yet never in history had one even come down in total collapse. Grow up.
Stringyheads 1 month ago
@Illumirage Right, that explains the Israeli's dancing and taking photos of the Panes hitting the building at a car park, They even claimed they was there to film the event.
What about the Israeli's that was caught with a van full of explosives near the GW Bridge They was all let off the hook Google and YouTube it folks (Mossad with truck of Explosives 9/11) Not to mention the US Gov flew the Bin Laden family out while all fights was grounded,
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Illumirage Your a Racist against Muslims, Acts of terror since that fatal day.
Forget the fact the US has occupied the Middle east for well over a decade and committed many war crimes for the greed of a few and for the Israeli Government.
Just look at it now folks (War for Iran) Israel is pushing this so hard and the UN don't mind they even help with the Israeli agenda for the government overthrow in Syria.GYFS
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads
Wow. you're just full of errors. You can't be racist against Muslims because there are Muslims of every race. Even if you claimed 'bigoted' I wouldn't buy it, because I have a legit problem w/ Islam. 18,444 acts of Islamic terror since that fateful day and apparently, I'm just supposed to shut the fuck up, in your book. How about you do so.
You're a Jew-hater, anti-semite. And have the nerve to call me 'naive. Funny, the word fits you to a T.
Illumirage 1 week ago
Comment removed
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Illumirage My Partner and i are both Jews that does not give me the right to all you Goyim, But i will call you Smart Ass.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads
Meh...
Take a walk.
Illumirage 1 week ago
@Illumirage Now shall we talk about the USS Liberty and the Lavon Affair just to bring everyone to the realisation of the reality that Israel does not give 2 hoots about The USA. I really have enough room to elaborate on it here but what i will do is put a search suggestion for everyone, The they can look and form their own perceptions.
Please google or YouTube( Levon Affair USS Liberty) You will also see alot more.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads
The problem with you USS Liberty and Lavon Affair claims, is that
BOTH of the historical SOURCES of your claim, mainly the USS
LIBERTY CREW, and the LAVON affair participants, BOTH
reject your interpretation of their events. The USS Liberty crew
ABHORS the anti-semite creeps that try to steal THEIR story
for their own wacko conspiracy theories.
Merlin5by5 1 week ago
@Merlin5by5 Your entitled to your opinion and perception do you think other people are entitled to theirs or should they not look into it themselves if they want?
I'm not going to even entertain your anti Semite garbage, That's a sign of weakness to have to resort to the racist propaganda that you all quickly build when you feel fear.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Illumirage Naive shallow minded, hmm a simpleton, Quick to form opinion based on other people perceptions and except them as truth. Excepts the Original story even though that has changed a few times. Will be content to live in bondage, Has lack of knowledge with local Affairs so could not confront global affairs.
Afraid to form own opinion, Likes to follow the masses for feeling of security.
Feels the need to support government whether right or wrong, Vain to i might add.
Stringyheads 1 week ago
@Stringyheads
Shitty part is that overwhelming evidence points against your 'point'. You need to seriously reevaluate your thought processes. It's really actually pretty pathetic.
I don't support our gov't right or wrong, I'm one of the biggest critics of our current gov't. Way to assume. You sure are assuming, about a boatload of things about me. Assumption doesn't help your case one bit.
Not to mention you're INCREDIBLY condescending. Of course, just about every truther I've ever run into is.
Illumirage 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey morons. The burden of proof is on you. Dont expect people who dont agree with you to prove you wrong because you have to first demonstrate your claims. calling this video a hoax withoutproof of that is not evidence its a clear bias showing you have no business talking about this because you have already made up your mind based on false evidence.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
FACT: The presence of thermite has been demonstrated at WTC site.
FACT: Molten iron such as observed at WTC results from thermite demolition and not office fires.
FACT: Thermite devices for demolition have been patented years before 9/11.
FACT: The effectiveness of thermite demo devices have been demonstrated on YouTube.
So it has been proved National Geographic's take on thermite is false.
So it looks like you have made up *your* mind based on false evidence.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz Its a fact you read a paper that said there was thermite but that still has not been demonstrated nor did that pass peer-review. Its an article in a journal and not scientific evidence. How do you not get that? I love how you try to act like fire weakening the steel and the building colapsing is impossible when that explaination makes a hell of a lot more sence. Do you really think the building would have just burnt forever without anything happening?
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
FACT: A scientific paper by scientists published in a science journal - way better than your speculations.
FACT: No heat-weakened steel found at WTC.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz Thats not true at all. It is shown in the videos before the towers fell that the heat was causing the buildings to bow. How dishonest can you be? Do you really think the towers would have just burnt until there was nothing left like a cig? And that fire didnt destroy the charges on the floors that the fire was? But the building fell from those points. It was not like a demo at all. You say somethings a hoax but you cannot demonstrate that. You are just speculating. Hypocrite.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
I'm not dishonest.
FACT: NIST studied steel samples from WTC - didn't you know even that much? No steel found to have reached critical temperatures. So you're simply wrong on that point.
FACT: Igniting thermite takes *higher* temperatures than produced by office fires. Another false idea of yours fails the test of reality.
FACT: NIST found initiation of demolition began on floors *other* than where impacts hit. Strike three!
You still can't cope with the facts.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz There ya go saying you are not dishonest and then lying. The buildings fell from the impact areas and where the buildings were burning watch any video and you can see tha. Thermite doesnt blow tself up does it? The fire didnt burn whatever ignition divices that were on those floors? But the buildings fell from those floos. Stp lying I know you read an article that faile peer-review and just believed it and when shown evidence that refutes you you just say its a hoax. Prove it.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
FACT: NIST tells us collapse initiated on floors *above* impact zone. Oops - caught you in another lie.
FACT: Ordinary office fires and open flames insufficient to ignite thermite. Oops! Caught you in yet another lie.
FACT: The Harrit paper was published in a peer reviewed journal. Oops! The lies keep coming from you!
FACT: The National Geographic demonstration on thermite has been debunked. Thermite cuts through structural steel like a hot knife through butter.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz Hey moron I know you think you have some high ground but if, but you are full of it. That paper only was published in a journal and there is no further study done and it failed peer-review. You think all a scienist has to do is publish paper in a journal? You have to be a moron. Sorry thats not how science works. There is no evidence of thermit. I love the lies youpeople tll like the photos ofsteel beams you say were cut buy thermite but they were not an that been proven. Liars
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
FACT: You lied *again" about this peer reviewed scientific paper. Shame on you!
So it seems you are the one here who prefers to lie instead of presenting evidence - as scientists do when they publish their research in science journals.
Your childish resort to name-calling really says all there is to say about your approach to rational thought: you're against it.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz No I did not lie moron and yesI am calling you a moron because tha is what you are.You are claiming all your work is done and that a paper published in a scientific journal is all your side needed to do. Sorry kid but thats not science you have to still demonstrate the claims which they have failed to do. I dont know who lied to you but publishing a paper is not it pall. There is much more to science ten publishing a paper expecially when it failed peer-review. Sorry kid.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
FACT: Harrit's paper passed peer review - that's how it got into a peer reviewed journal.
You consistantly lie on this point - I guess it shows how threatened you feel by scientific research.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz No you keep lying and dont understand that there is more to science then publishing a paper in a journal and thats all you keep talking about and you obviously dont know that is has to be demonstrable as well were any1 could repeat their experiment. When other scintist looked at there study they found it was incorrect nd failed peer-review. Sorry but any1 can publish a paper in a journal. You really dont understand the peer-review process do you? What you think some1 just reads it?
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
Why do you oppose scientists publishing in journals and simultaneously 'demand' peer review? You're just confused at best.
No evidence Harrit's paper 'failed' review since it was published in a peer reviewed journal.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz I do not oppose scientific publishings but I do understand there is more to science the publish a paper in a journal. That is not the same as presenting the information in a scientific forum that is open to debate and winning a scientific consensus. There is a reason why your side has not attempted to do that once. It is because they would lose. I'm not lying to you. Some of the best scientist have mentioned exactly what I am telling you.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
Duh! A science journal *is* a scientific forum! Harrit's paper presents the evidence for scientific debate.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz Duh, no it isnt moron. HAHAHAHAHA. You are really not very intellignet at all. You dont really know anything about that paper and the people who wrote it do you? HAHAHAHAHA. No it didnt kid. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
Your frequent use of CAPS LOCK tells us all we need to know about you.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz Really? What can you tell bou me then? SO now you are a phsyco analist? What degrees do you hold? I can tell much about you y your lies andcomplet ignorane. You believe in something that has been disproved. It was also dishonest which can be proven and there is evidence for that. How can you be so dishonest and willfully ignorant?
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
You keep claiming without evidence harrit's work has been 'disproved' or somehow got published in a peer reviewed journal after supposedly failing peer review.
Since you believe these things without proof, it must be a psychological block.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz Wow you are really a stupid hypocrite. Your position is faith based moron. This nat geo proves you wrong and the paper and you are too stupid to understand that you also have a problem with making fallacious statements. I never said that scientist dont publish works in journals and you keep saying lies. I said thats not all they do and you know nothing about the scientific process and you shouldnt be talking about something you know nothing about.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
I have already shown that the National Geographic program is simply wrong on the issue of thermite.
It is a sick joke to fool the credulous like yourself.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz You keep pointing to your joke of evidence as proof hat refutes actually sietifc evidence. Sorry but you need to tell me where you went to college and what degrees you hold and then I will call up that school and tell them they failed to teach you the basic scientific method. Sorry but you still miss the very important point that the paper you keep siting is not fact and was written by morons for morons. You keep claiming that nat geo is wrong well prove and use more then 1 reference
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
No, it is National Geographic's presentation which is a joke.
You haven't told anybody about your college degrees or which scholls you attend. No reason for anyone to give you information when you are ashamed of your own inability to achieve any academic distinction.
Harrit is a respected scientist - so you're just calling him a 'moron' because he's way more qualified than you will ever be? Sad.
You fail. Again. And again.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz For some1 who likes to make fallacious statement about other English and grammar skills you seem to make quite a bit of mistakes. Its schools not scholls. You also never asked me so acting like I am trying to keep it a secret is a joke. I did however ask you and you seem to not want to talk about that subject. "you are ashamed of your own inability to achieve any academic distinction.", are you kidding me? And you say I fail? Your logic is as childish as your comments.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
Apparently 'fallacious' appeared on your word-a-day calendar. Nice to see you're trying to improve your language skills - sad to see you're not very good at it.
You 'deamnd' to see the credentials of others, yet are unwilling to provide your own.
Either you're afraid to do so, or just a plain and simple hypocrite.
But Harrit is an internationally known and respected man of science.
No reason to accept the word of a troll like you over this accomplished professional.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz "Apparently 'fallacious' appeared on your word-a-day calendar. Nice to see you're trying to improve your language skills - sad to see you're not very good at it.". Damn you are dishonest. I used the word fallacious because all your statements are fallacious and youhave no place talking about my Langage skills when you cannot comment without making a fallacious statement. I also never said Iwas afraid to show my credentials and that is a lie.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
Why are you afraid to say you are afraid/
Don't ask for what you won't give - you'll look less like a hypocrite.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz You have been asked by me and other and have not demonstrated anything but you want to lie and act like I am scared? How dishonest can you be? "But Harrit is an internationally known and respected man of science.". Another lie you tell because Harrit is not respected, nor has Harrit demonstrated a single shred of what has been claimed. You lost and are too stupid to understand that. Go lie to someone else moron. You just say silly shit only you believe. Good job retard.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
FACT: Thermite demolition devices have been patented.
FACT: These devices work very efficiently as anyone with eyes can see.
So yes I have demonstrated very thoroughly National Neographic's program is a sad farce only the very ignorant would put their trust in.
Now you keep attacking Harrit, yet cannot back up asny of your lies about him. A glance at his CV will prove he is a respected man of science.
You have been demonstrated to be a liar.
Why do you lie?
proudfootz 7 months ago
@db10001110101
You are simply lying.
Niels Harrit is a respected man of science to whom other scientists submit their work for peer review:
Referee duties:
Countless review assignments, most recently for Journal of Organic Chemistry, Photochemistry and Photobiology,
J. Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Organic Letters, Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences.
You are just an anonymous internet troll.
You fail. Again.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz "Harrit is a respected scientist - so you're just calling him a 'moron' because he's way more qualified than you will ever be". Must not be very respected since Harrit's view has been disproved by respected scientist and the majority of all scientist, and I am talking about the most respected scientist as well, no not share your's and Harrit's view. Also you are now claiming to be able to see the future. How do you know what qualifications I currently and eventually will have?
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
This alleged 'scientist' who allegedly 'disproved' Harrit's work doesn't have a name, does she? You just made this up.
Scienctific knowledge is advanced by people like Harrit and not people like you.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@db10001110101
You keep saying some 'respected scientist' has allegedly falsified Harrit's research.
Does this person have a name?
If you can't provide the name and the peer reviewed journal this 'disproof' was supposedly published in we'll all know you just made it up.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz You are just making more fallacious statements showing that you need to go to college because you are acting like a child with his fingers in his ears going nanananananananananana I'm right your wrong nnananananananananana. Grow up and educate yourself. You still havent mentioned why other scientist have to argue their points and win scientific consensus before their material is excepted and your side doesnt have to do that? You know nothing about science and your comments show that.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
Sorry you hate the idea of scientists publishing their findings in science journals for all the scientific community to consider.
But I guess the real world is going to continue to be a problem for you since Harrit is doing what all other scientists do - study phenomenon and publish the findings.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz The only thing you keep demonsrating is that you couldnt pass a college class. One, you always need more then 1 source. Two, your sources have to be credible which yours are not. Three, you use only fallacious statements whilre you write showing that you havethe mentality of a child.
You really need to grow up and get an educaton beore its too late old man.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
...and *you* pass your classes by just sitting in the corner shrieking 'moron!' over and over again?
Nothing 'incredible' about using a science journal as a source of information.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz The manner in which the paper was published was decietful. You dont get to pick who peer-reviews your work. You kee making fallacious statements that just waste time. You fail to acknowledge any point I have made and instead act like a child with you fingers in your ears. You came up with this all based on a shitty paper published by morons which has been shown to be se. You know this and just want to keep lying to people who dishonest moron.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
You keep harping on your malicious lies about a paper you can't refute, while you ignore the many other facts that I cited.
Your tiny temper tantrum is deceitful.
That's why you have to rely on name-calling - you have no rational argument to give.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz Ask someone from whatever university you wish that works in the science department and ask them if posting a paper in a scientific journal is the same as presenting information and showing repeatable experiments that any scientist could repeat and argue for a scientific consensus and win. Ask a scientist that question and see what they tell you. Sorry but your side refuses to present anything in a scientific forum open to debate just like creationist.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
Ask any scientist from whichever forum you like and ask if your name-calling has ever advanced scientific knowledge.
Then compare that to their answer as to why real scientists like Harrit publish their findings in science journals.
I think you'll be surprised at the answers!
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz I'm not trying to do anything but make fun of you for being a moron. Sorry if you stil cant understand this. I know why the paper you speak of is useless and I just love hearing you lie. Thermite was never found in the WTC rubble. You want to twist shit around and lie and so its a fact they found it but thats not true at all liar. Also that paper was not peer-reviewed before it was published and failed peer-review after it had been.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
Sorry the science is contradicting your wild claims.
I guess your word for rational person is 'moron'.
Whoever taught you English did a piss-poor job.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz I love watching the asshole who lied to you handle the so called sample and contaminates it the entire time showing hes a poor scientist. Also you dont know anything about scienc and al you have done is expressed your lack of itelligence and your biased bile that just makes you look foolish. Get an education moron.Seriously I'm right and you are wrong. Call up a scientist and ask moron. Or are you to lazy like all truthers who want o claim truth without doing any real work. Lazy liar
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
Now you're trying to claim (without evidence as usual) that the thermite in the samples came from improper handling?
Hilarious!
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz Are you kidding me? There is a video of the moron improperly handling the material. You keep lying and lying and lying. No, scientist dont just publish papers in journals especially when they cannot provide sufficient evidence to win a scientific consensus like your side has. Ok, a paper was published but do you know what the next step is? My use of the word moron when referring to you is correct.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
Why do you think there are hundreds of science journa;ls and hundreds of thousands of science papers published in them?
Your name-calling is just childish. I t shows you have no real argument to put forward and are afraid.
proudfootz 8 months ago
@proudfootz WHy was there only four papers published that journal which you claim to be credible in the year 2009? Your logic is childish. You seriously dont know anything about this and just believed it based on a video or that joke of a paper which does not count as fact because they have no tried to demonstrate this in a non-biased academic forum. Sorry but you fail every time you speak.
db10001110101 8 months ago
@db10001110101
Since when does the number of papers published in a journal have anything to do with the scientific value of the published work?
You're just grasping at straws since Harrit's paper is a threat to your cherished faith.
proudfootz 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@proudfootz No thats shpwing that the journal isnt a very good one and the fact that you do not get that shows your ignorance. You are the one with the faith position because there is no proof and you still believe it. Grow up.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
So you admit you have no credible reason to doubt the research published in the science journal.
As I thought - it is simply your irrational reaction to having your faith questioned.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz You keep saying things that you are guilty of. Your view is faith based and mine is a disbelief in your view. Sorry you cannot understand that.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@proudfootz I never said ave no credible reason to doubt the findings in the paper, but there is a ton of evidence to refute that paper and the very nature of that paper is dishonest and only the credulous could believe it. You keep saying my position is faith based but your is you hypocrite. You think you can refute facts with that joke of a paper? You hveto be the ost ignorant person I have talked in a while. You claim things are a hoax based on this? You moron.
db10001110101 7 months ago
@db10001110101
I have simply relied on facts to reach my conclusions.
All you have offered is name-calling.
Still cannot cite any scientific work which refutes the Harrit paper?
Until you can do so your whining is simply your uninformed opinion.
proudfootz 7 months ago
@proudfootz You keep missing my point that scientist do more then just publishing papers. I demonstrated that fact. Every scientist have to win a scientific consensus to hve their work taken seriously. You need to understand this moron. Now Why do you seem to refuse to acknowledge this point and instead make fallacious statements showing you cant understand simple English? Take some science courses. Science isnt faith based moron if something con be demonstrated you have to except it. Moron
db10001110101 7 months ago