well I think you could have accomplished this without rotoscoping...there are not many movements. But it is worth the try and share the results. 5/5 !
This particular animation took a couple hours. Rotoscoping isn't really a shortcut as much as it is a way to acheive more realistic motion, and sometime's it fails at that. 3d rotoscoping, for one thing, operates also in the hidden Z axis, which is hard to decode from the video alone, so, usually, when you change the camera angle on a finished rotoscoped scene, the animation looks much, MUCH less realistic. Motion capture, though, is automated, which makes it completely realistic AND a shortcut.
Well I was thinking that maybe it would be a bit easier by eliminating the hidden z axis by using tracking software like syntheyes. You'd still have to use a lot of guesswork, but I assume that'd b ea bit easier.
You should have made him the dayman
BurntSpaghettiFace 1 month ago
CAAAAROL!!! CAROLL!
GrandpaFlorida 1 year ago 2
I've got BOXES full of Pepe.
KommisarKowl 1 year ago
WHO IS PEPE SILVIA?!
frickfrock999 1 year ago
@frickfrock999 Pennsylvania.
arndawg 1 year ago
good job!
Jermanicus169 1 year ago
you should have made him green.
morkdrum 1 year ago 48
that's cool dude!
shatterjack 1 year ago
Wow, I don't know why you receiving negative comments saying how lame and unnnecassary this was. It 's a great idea and you applied it well.
Is it possible to replace the animation with human faces? Ha
Great job.
Elyzater 1 year ago
cool and well done. BUT, if you where gonna model Charlie, it only makes sense to animate him colored GREEN! Just sayin'.... :)
spunkybrewster1972 1 year ago
Combining my two favorite things. Nice! :)
xerograde 1 year ago
how is this pointless?
it's really cool, and that alone is a reason to do it.
it would be great for making animations that replicate videos... that's pretty awesome in itself.
FFScantgetadamnname 1 year ago
what in the fuck was this?
daniellechristians 1 year ago
i think i just got a new hobby
rock2metal666 2 years ago
The final blue guy freaked me out - great job!
PureEvilFilms 2 years ago
Wow. Really good job on this.
And as icing on the cake, you picked one of, if not the best comedic moments in recent television.
stratking86 2 years ago 3
awsome
jesse6669 2 years ago
there is absolutely ZERO point to this but its pretty cool
honorman1181 2 years ago 7
pretty useful software
gmazing 2 years ago
wow.
classicdisaster09 2 years ago
Nice work.
CaptainTae 2 years ago 2
hmmm pointless, but cool too :)
LightWithoutSun 2 years ago 13
Why do this?
luffarantastarn 2 years ago
good idea.
nelsontr 2 years ago
Awesome job.
CaponeXX 2 years ago
well I think you could have accomplished this without rotoscoping...there are not many movements. But it is worth the try and share the results. 5/5 !
blenderguy2008 2 years ago
How long did it take you to do that?
I was thinking of trying something like that because I can't afford a motion capture set.
LazyCoder 3 years ago 2
This particular animation took a couple hours. Rotoscoping isn't really a shortcut as much as it is a way to acheive more realistic motion, and sometime's it fails at that. 3d rotoscoping, for one thing, operates also in the hidden Z axis, which is hard to decode from the video alone, so, usually, when you change the camera angle on a finished rotoscoped scene, the animation looks much, MUCH less realistic. Motion capture, though, is automated, which makes it completely realistic AND a shortcut.
eedobaba7726 3 years ago 3
Well I was thinking that maybe it would be a bit easier by eliminating the hidden z axis by using tracking software like syntheyes. You'd still have to use a lot of guesswork, but I assume that'd b ea bit easier.
LazyCoder 3 years ago