Added: 3 years ago
From: habsplek14
Views: 40,523
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (521)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How could you not put her majesty's secret service as 20? That movie SUCKED.

  • Worst Bonds-any starring Roger Moore and the worst of Moore's is The Man With The Golden Gun which is funny cause the director of Gun, Guy Hamilton, also made one of the best- Goldfinger.

  • Quantum of solace and casino royale would not make it into the top 22 - they are that bad!

  • @TopGrob077

    I strongly disagree. Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace are my top favorites! I have seen all 23 bond films exept for two of Pierce Bronstons, one of Sean Connerys, and the good old bond film by George Lazenby.

  • Best

    1. Tomorrow Never Dies

    2. A View To A Kill

    3. GoldenEye

    4. The Spy Who Loved Me

    5. Die Another Day

    Worst

    1. Quantum Of Solace

    2. On Her Majesty's Secret Service

    3. The World Is Not Enough

  • I think the title of the video was supposed to be 'Countdown from Best to Worst'

  • @silly3200 not compared to about 15 other bonds in my book.

  • Are you kidding me? Die another day and tommorow never dies were amazing

  • @TimHthefullclip777 Die another day was patheic and tommorow never dies was mediocre compared to films such as the spy who loved me, from russia with love, license to kill, the living daylights, octopussy, goldeneye, goldfinger, the list goes on man.

  • My top 5:

    1. GoldenEye

    2. Dr. No

    3. From Russia with Love

    4. Goldfinger

    5. Live and Let Die

  • Die another day was crap.

  • how is daf higher than licence to kill and the living daylights ??

  • there are no bad bond films in my opinion now there are some bonds who are better than others sean connery lazerby and daniel craig are the best bonds but, i love roger moore too timothy dalton is ok but i dont like pierce bronson.

  • My favourite james bond movie is die another day and gold finger.

  • I have seen all bond flicks, and i think Casino Royale is the best Bond ever made.

  • Wow, you fucking suck. Moonraker is amazing.

  • @maxissocool12  You have good taste

  • a view to a kill at 20, your having a laugh or what ,top 3 at least!

  • number 17 and 16 should be on the top 10.

  • Octopussy!!

  • There are 22 movies in the whole series.....that video is basically saying that only two of the movies are good. WTF?????

  • People clearly don't realize that Diamonds are Forever is thee worst Bond movie ever

  • @movies193 Depends on opinions...I loved it!

  • A VIEW TO KILL COME ON JUST BECAUSE IT HAS GRACE JONES IN IT DOESNT MEAN ITS BAD Moonraker and the living daylights were bad

  • octopussy and moonraker are the worst bond movies and the best one is the spy who loved me

  • A view to a kill #20?

  • OK Top 2 I agree with but Thunderball #6, that should be 3 or higher no doubt. Must be an obvious Connery fan no problem with that, but come on View to a Kill is #20, that movie was ten times better than Live and let Die. Plus the remake of Casino Royale' is definently in the top ten on my list.

  • @bdfc1981 he doesnt have the craigs, i agree though about casino royale, would put it no. 2

  • why is licence to kill #14?

  • @dalfan1234 IKR! That was the first film I've seen!

  • The Die Another Day song is a huge joke -.-

  • @silly3200 Indeed it is.

  • @movies193 More like QOS sucks big Thunderballs.

  • 1. Live and Let die - Roger Moore

    2. From Russia With Love - Sean Connery

    3. The man with the golden gun - Roger Moore

    I dont remeber so much from "Thunderball" and "For your eyes only"

  • DIE ANOTHER DAY IS AWSOME MOTHER FUCKER BITCH

  • @dkdps1 I agree with that.

  • Every murder in Casino Royale and Quantum done by Bond was in self-defense or duty. In Dr No, Sean Connery murders an unarmed bad guy in cold blood while smoking a cigarette. In MWGG Roger Moore batters a woman for information (which I disapprove of). Dalton in LTK sets a guy on fire and impales an unarmed guy with a harpoon gun. The old Bonds were actually pretty vicious. I know Craig is cool, but he's not the only tough one.

  • casino royale is my favorite. then dr no

  • I loved die another day!

  • @Smagdaggot  Same here.

  • @Smagdaggot omg that was the only one i watched and i think it is the best james bond movie!

  • Hmm.. very mixed thoughts about your choices, I must say. Especially with films like Licence to Kill :/

  • A very evident Connery bias here.

  • Imdb is a bad place to go to rank Bond movies. You should have just asked me. TB YOLT and DAF are too high and TLD and TWINE are too low on idb's list.

  • @Duke1839 And it is also a bad place for opinions.

  • daniel craig is finished as bond apparently danny dyer,owen wilson,clive owen and collin farrell are being considered for the role. i think danny dyer would be best

  • I love Die Another Day :C

  • @DangerousPirate

    So do I. :D

    But hey, to each his own.

  • @DangerousPirate Its one of my favorites

  • To me the best Bond movies are

    From Russia With Love

    On Her Majesty's Secret Service

    The Spy Who Loved Me

    Moonraker

    For Your Eyes Only

    A View To A Kill

  • I never liked the Roger Moore films much. He always seemed to me to be a mummy's boy. I really liked Casino Royale, and will now work my way through the catalogue of Bond films I haven't seen to get more favourites. From watching this vid, I will search out 'From Russia With Love'.

  • Oh yeah! That fag Daniel Craige isn't evene here!

  • @VaiTrooper read the info dummy. anyways casino royale is probably the best bond yet.

  • @habsplek14 classics are the best my personal favorite=live and let die:D

  • @habsplek14 nothing beats the first three

  • @habsplek14 There is nothing for me to do but agree with your statement, Casino Royale is very entertaining, with good acting and the most REALISTIC ''special effects/action scenes''

    Id Est, no things like high powered laser WATCHES and 1960 missile eating missiles are present. ;)

  • @VaiTrooper YA YOU PEICE OF LIVING SHIT

    DANIEL CRAIG IS THE BEST BOND AND CASINO ROYALE IS FUCKEN EPIC

  • @VaiTrooper So if Daniel Craig... is a fag... in your ''macho'' view.. what does that make Roger Moore?

    Is he the ''gaylord'' of the bonds ?

  • @VaiTrooper ur a fuckin idiot

  • I disagree with most of the list. but one thing is for sure Almost everyone including me agrees that Goldfinger is No1

  • I'm glad Goldeneye is in the Top 5 since it basically revived the franchise. On Her Majesty's Secret Service should be in the top 5.

    The problem with ranking Bond on popularity is that Connery's films get bloated favoritism because they have Connery in them. Sure, Dr. No, Goldfinger, and From Russia deserve it, but his other films are too mediocre to all appear in the Top 10.

    I'd put Quantum at about 10. Casino Royale deserves Top 5 (over the Spy Who Loved Me).

  • gotta agree with that list, goldfinger is my top one too, from russia with love is my top two, my top 3 is goldeneye, 4th is thunderball, but that list compared to the one on the video, with old bond movies, with all bond movies, my top one actually is casino royale.

  • the bond movies therew 10 don't suck

  • I never understood why people always rate Thunderball so highly.

  • @TimsVideos17 Here here. Number 6 through 4 are great films but ranked a bit too high. On Her Majesty's Secret Service should be in the top 3, without a question at the very least in the top 5. It's at # 8 because of idiots who have never seen the movie ranking it low because it's the Bond film that had the infamous only did Bond once George Lazenby in it.

  • @cartooz2003 According to this video its wrong.The world is

    not enough is great bottom line.Do you see that die another

    day was not great and it cost brosnan his job.These people

    who are ranking these videos are not real bond fans.They

    are people from imdb who think they know what they are

    talking about and dont.

  • @cartooz2003 And I will never get you dalton fans.You people

    dont make anysence.He only did two films.He hast did anything

    to prove he is bond and is not even close to being the best.His

    perfomance was a fail.Here are facts.1 he only did two.2 even

    connery and moore dont approve of his performance.3 LTK and

    TLD were not box office hits.4 he was'nt even suppose to be bond

    in the first place.It was suppose to be brosnan.

  • @58fenix as if. Lazenby was better than Moore and he did one. The reason why people like Dalton is that the later half of Moore's Bond career is fail and Dalton brought a down-to-earth feel to the character after Moore destroyed it by appearing in a clown costume as Bond.

  • @58fenix Dalton was great as Bond. 1. His two films are great 2. Connery never said anything of his performance and Moore hasn't even seen his films. 3. Box office returns show poor marketing, not poor films. 4. Yes he was, they actually wanted him to replace Connery after You Only Live Twice when he was in his 20's, but he denied the role believing he was too young. Dalton is also the closest Bond to Ian Fleming's novels.

  • @TheGuyThatsAwesome Now back to you!First of all

    fact nuber 2 is true.Connery and moore did say something

    about him.Go to IMDB and you will see that it is true.And

    it had nothing to do with poor marketing.Stop making

    excuses for him.He sucked there is a big reason why

    he only did two.He was pathetic.Dont believe me look

    it up.Now has for him being bond after connery you

    are right.But if he did take over and it was'nt moore.

    Bond would'nt had continued.Dalton had his chance

    and failed.

  • @58fenix You obviously don't know what you're talking about. Licence to Kill originally was titled Licence Revoked but was changed at the last minute, making the have to get rid of all trailers and other promotional items with the title Licence Revoked. And Dalton did decline the role in 1968 because at age 24, he felt too young for the role. This caused few trailers for the film and as a result a poor box office run.

  • @58fenix And Dalton was supposed to do more films, but the financial issues the producers were going through caused the next film to be delayed multiple times. Dalton then got to the point were he gave up the role.

  • @TheGuyThatsAwesome Dude are you not reading

    what I said.You are wrong and cant prove what you

    are saying.Guess what I can.Look here's were it ends

    from here.Dont give me that stupid story about him

    quiting.I have already heard it and know the whole

    story.Your problem is you think that really happened

    and it did'nt go that way.The bottom line is this HE

    SUCKED GET OVER IT If he was good like you say

    then brosnan would'nt have became bond and he

    would have continued but did'nt.FACT!

  • @58fenix It's alright to admit you're wrong pal. I was alive during the the time when Dalton quit the role due to the delays. And it was a shame because he was spectacular in the role. Not only was he the closest Bond to Fleming's novels, he also brought the character back down to Earth after Roger Moore nearly destroyed the character. And what are your reasons for him sucking? Oh yeah, you have none.

  • @TheGuyThatsAwesome You my sir can not read!Do me a favor

    dont respond to me anymore.Got it!You pretty much just got OWNED!

  • @TheGuyThatsAwesome And he did'nt decline the role.

    The producers did.You my sir have a lot of catching up

    to do.And if anyone is the closest,it may be craig.Because

    for one he has soooo much dangere and looks like a

    military machine that could kill.Someone you dont mess

    with.I'm not not saying he's the best but he is great.

  • @58fenix Yes it is true that Brosnan was the first choice and was suppose to be Bond after A View to a Kill but he had to drop out because RS had gotten picked up for another season. But you are still ignoring the fact that Dalton was suppose to be Bond way back in the 60's but he refused the role, which if you look it up is a fact. How can the producers decline Dalton the role if he didn't even have the job in the first place? That doesn't even make sense.

  • @cartooz2003 But your argument is the producers perfer Brosnan over Dalton and because Brosnan was in more bond films and his films made more money so that must mean he was a better Bond right? If the producer always wanted Brosnan over Dalton, why didn't they fire Dalton after the TLD and hire Brosnan because RS had been cancled before LTK had gone into production. So if Brosnan had started he would have been in 6 films, but what if Dalton didn't leave the role before Goldeneye?

  • @cartooz2003 And second connery,moore,brosnan and

    craig are way better than dalton.What are you talking about.

    Why are you giving credit to a man that only did two???

    And they did fire dalton.They just dont tell you that!And

    after TLD there's nothing wrong with giving someone

    a chance!But he still did'nt work.Like I said if he was

    that good I would'nt be sitting here arguing with you

    about this and brosnan would'nt have been considered.

  • @cartooz2003 No they were thinking about it.Dalton is'nt

    stupid.He would'nt say no to the biggest role thats out

    there.Now does that makesense.Nobody would say no

    to the bond role no one!Like I said if he would have took

    over bond after connery and moore did'nt come in.Bond

    would have not continued!

  • @58fenix You completly ignored my statement about Dalton was suppose to Goldeneye, which is a fact. During that long gap between LTK and GE it wasn't like Dalton was let go and they eventually hired Brosnan when they decided they were doing GE. Dalton had the job almost the entire time but after tons of delay and other frustrations, Dalton left the role during Goldeneye's pre-production. Brosnan hiring was a logical choice, but what if Dalton had done GE? Brosnan might have never been 007.

  • @cartooz2003 Answer this question why do you think

    there was so many delays?Answer this question was

    there any delays when brosnan was bond???There

    was a reason why there was delays.AGAIN!READ

    MY WORDS HE WAS'NT THAT GOOD!!GET IT THREW

    YOUR THICK SKULL.

  • @cartooz2003 And I never ignored what you said.Never!

    And it is,box office is important.Why do you think there

    was so many delays.Why do you wonder why he was'nt

    bond anymore.That talks for itself.Your the one that keeps

    ignoring what I said.And marketing had nothing to do with

    GE being great.GE and him when he was bond was both

    great.I liked TLD,but that was'nt the problem the problem

    was dalton.And yes DAD is but that was because people

    thought it was going to be great and was'nt.

  • @58fenix Lastly, once again I must state that comparing box office records to how good a movie is, isn't a good argument.  Yes Brosnan films are more popular thanks to marketing, marketing and hype for Brosnan that had started all the way back to the 80's because RS was tailor making him to be 007, but look at box office mojo and see what Brosnan highest grossing Bond film was. Goldeneye? TND? Nope, it's the much loved Die Another Day, which is still the highest grossing Bond film of all time.

  • @cartooz2003 We expect him to be great because

    he had done so well.But it does'nt mean it's going to

    be great.It was the film that sucked not him.I hope

    you this time read everything I said because I do not

    what to repeat myself.

  • @58fenix There was a delay when Brosnan was Bond. When they fired him and hired Craig, that was a four year delay right there that unlike Dalton or Craig right now, had nothing to do with legal issues. What does the delays due to legal battles in between LTK and GE have to do with Dalton? He isnt a producer, or a lawyer, or a studio CEO. Also Brosnan is the only Bond actor to ever be fired from the role, everybody else has left under their own free will, including Lazenby and Dalton. Thats fact.

  • @cartooz2003 No dude I was saying when he was bond

    there was no delays.Except when he injured himself but

    other than that there were no delays.And delays have a

    lot to do with dalton.He just was'nt that great.I bet you if

    brosnan was bond instead I gurantee you there would

    had noit been one delay.As for dalton he was fired!Thats

    what really happen and brosnan was fired because they

    did'nt have a choice it was'nt because of him it was because

    of the film.

  • @58fenix Wrong again. Brosnan also quit from the role when the producers couldn't decide on whether to keep the series on the same track as Die Another Day or whether to reboot the series. And I haven't seen you give one good or even decent reason as to why Dalton wasn't good. Do you happen to be a Roger Moore fan?

  • @58fenix Brosnan also quit as he was getting old and didn't want to get to the point that Roger Moore did in A View to A Kill.

  • @TheGuyThatsAwesome That's the 64,000 dollar question. Did he get canned or did he quit? I say the answer is somewhere down the middle.

  • @58fenix I'm not arguing that more people pefer Dalton over Brosnan, I agree with you there my friend. What I am saying is that Brosnan's popularity had more to do with his good looks and his marketablity, than the quality of his films and performance. The producers agree with me there, or else why would they fire him when his films were very sucessful. And yes, all the product placement, commercials, and a popular video game, all of that is marketing. Which Brosnan had more of than Dalton.

  • @cartooz2003 Its all about performance,stop making

    excuses for him.He was not great.You dont do two than

    say you were great the buiseness does not run like that.

    If you are great you will stay.I dont know what you see in

    him but ,he was a waste!

  • @58fenix Well I should have done this from the begining, but rather than argue back and forth about what happen to Dalton, we should probably read the facts on wikepidia. After reading on the Dalton section I found out I was wrong about one thing. I thought Brosnan was first choice for TLD. And if you go to Dalton's wikipedia, it explains he was liked by critics. If you go on wikepdia and read on Brosnan's films for the exception of GE all his reviews are mixed to negative.

  • @cartooz2003 All right it ends from here and I'm only going to say this

    one time so listen up.first of that wikipedia crap,like I said they dont

    tell you everything that still does'nt mean nothing.Second I saw a bio

    on brosnan a few months back and they said that when brosnan was

    going to do TLD they tryed there best to change times for him to do

    it when he was doing his show RS!They tryed to work around it but

    Cubby did not care he said Quoet:James bond is not RS and RS

    is not james bond.

  • @cartooz2003 The fact is this for soemone to be so great for the role as

    for connery ,moore and brosnan they have a right to say anything they

    what beause they have proven they are bond.Connery, was the 60's

    moore was the 70's and brosnan did enough for the 90's.As for dalton

    he only did two,so regarless of what happen to him it still does'nt change

    the fact that he gets more respect then anyone that has nailed the role.

    Because he did'nt do enough.

  • @cartooz2003 When are you guys ever going to get that a man that has

    to prove he is a great bond that he has to do a lot more to prove he is

    going down as one of the best.You cant be one of the best only doing

    two moives because for one he would be doing more not two.I dont

    want to hear the excuses,I want to here facts,but guess what there

    are none for him.If you saw something in him that you liked then thats

    fine.

  • @cartooz2003 But for me and others and including connery and moore they

    will tell you he did'nt work and there is a big reason why he did'nt continue.

    And its not that court stuff.As for brosnan getting fired there is no 64,000

    dollar answer.He was let go because they felt like he was getting to old

    for the role and whated to start off with a brand new flesh.you cant start

    over with a 55 year all over again.Thats why he was let go.Dont get me

    wrong they liked brosnan they did'nt like DAD!

  • @cartooz2003 And all his reviews are mied to negative for Goldeneye.

    Did I read that correctly.After one of the greatest action films ever made

    and connery and moore liking them both claiming after watching that

    that they were both gone after seeing brosnan.Thats what they said.

    Believe I have seen dalton so many times and there is not one type

    of danger to him at all.Its not about acting,its not about doing a good

    job you have to be a major threat and you have to be real special.

  • @cartooz2003 He did'nt have that.Now I'm not responding to that

    the guythatsawesome guy because he has no clue what he is talking

    about.i fing=d it a waste of time because all his statments are WRONG.

    Now has for you,you stand up for what you believe and you try your

    best to search for you are saying.So I will debate with someone that

    might have some points not saying your right but again your statements

    are wrong.

  • @cartooz2003 Actually Quantum of Solace is the highest grossing film now. But when adjusted to the ticket prices now, I think either Goldfigner or Thunderball have that title.

  • @TheGuyThatsAwesome Even better that movie is the highest grossing movie. Makes logical sense though that QOS, DAD and Thunderball with inflation would be the highest earning in the series, seeming it piggy backs Casino Royale and Goldfinger, while Brosnan has been piggy backing Goldeneye his entire career.

  • @cartooz2003 On her majestys secret service was boring.

    What are you talking about.Lazenby was horrible.Even

    though I did like TLD but dalton was'nt that great.You

    have no facts at all to back up what you are saying.

  • @58fenix Well I think everyone else has sort of jabbed you for those comments you said, but to generalize I don't think you get what 99% of people think Bond films are suppose to be about, which hey are suppose to be spy thrillers or spy action films. They are not suppose to be Michael Bay films, or shoot em up action flicks, because I would rather just watch that than watch James Bond try to be those films. Also Brosnan wasn't suppose to be in Goldeneye in the first place, Dalton was.

  • @cartooz2003 the reason why these people have

    jabbed me for the comments I made is because I

    am right.Thats why!You say I dont understand,your

    the one that does'nt.I never said the new bond films

    were bay films.Were did that come from.Second craigs

    bond films are suppose to be this way for a reason.If

    you really knew what was going on,you would understand

    why there is a reason for whats going on but you dont.

  • @cartooz2003 You still did'nt come up with any facts.And

    you are wrong in what you said about brosnan.Brosnan

    was the one that should of took over in the 80's but could'nt

    because of RS!You do know that right.Oh thats right you dont.

    Check your history my friend and you will see i am right once

    again.99% of the people???If that was the case I would agree

    with what your saying but you are wrong.Like I said until you

    could come up with some facts that are true you will always

    be wrong.

  • @cartooz2003 Just ask yourself this question.How

    many films did dalton do?Answer yourself that question

    and when you do you would know why he was not that

    great!It ends here!

  • umm

    wheres never say never again because that was the absolute worst bond film of them all.

  • Oh come on Moonraker shouldnt be the 3rd worst that is where Qantum of Shit should be

  • @Badwolf117 I agree, Moonraker is stupid but its aware its stupid and its fun as hell to watch, same goes with A View to a Kill (kind of). The bottom three should be reserved for plothole infested crapfrests that were not fun at all and took themselves too seriously, like Quantum of Solace, The World is not Enough and Die Another Day.

  • @cartooz2003 i loved the world is not enough (it was decent) the only thing i couldnt stop thinking about is Denise Richards as a physicist!!!

  • @Badwolf117 Christmas only comes once a year.

  • Where is Casino Royale ? i understand Quantom of Solace probably did'nt premeire at that time but why no Casino Royale? becase it came out in 2006. Just wondering.

  • Bad list, bad list!

  • I feel like I spend too much time talking about the Bond movies I hate, how about talking about ones I love.

    Here are my top 7 Bond films. (Make it 8)

    1. From Russia With Love

    2. Goldfinger

    3. On Her Majesty's Secret Service

    4. Casino Royale

    5. Dr. No

    6. The Spy Who Loved Me/ Goldeneye (Tie)

    7. You Only Live Twice

  • Right Goldfinger No.1 for sure, bu from Russia With Love and Dr. No are two of the most boring films ever. The higlight of from Russia With Love is the fact that Grant is played by Quint. Moore was the best bond without a doubt.

  • to be honest i think it really matters what bond movies you were brought up watching. I was born watching the pierce brosnan movies and think they are easily the best as he set the bond benchmark for me.

  • @tonganflyguy Your right but I if your a real bond fan.

    Then that means just because you grew up in that

    time does'nt mean that one has to be your favorite.

    I grew up in the brosnan era and he is my favorite

    but if I had to go with the best its going to be connery

    and moore!

  • My favorite five Bond movies are (in order of release):

    From Russia With Love

    On Her Majesty's Secret Service

    For Your Eyes Only

    A View To A Kill

    The Living Daylights

    Honourable mentions are

    You Only Live Twice, Moonraker and Octopussy.

  • I think Thunderball and the Living Daylights should swich places not that Thunderball was bad or any thing .Its just what I think.

  • Martin Campbell needs to make bond 23 he made 2 great bond movies I think ,Goldeneye and Casino Royale

  • @HestandOO8 I was thinking the same thing the other day.

    Terrence young and guy hamliton,John glenn all did more

    than two so he should do more.I would'nt mind to see him

    do another with craig.

  • @HestandOO8 It seems its not going to happen for about a few years as their was a Money problem that cancelled the Making.

  • @HestandOO8 Agreed on Martin Campbell. The best Bonds are the ones who are directed by directors who are known as "Bond directors." Veterans of the Bond production who have worked on other Bond films doing other things for the producuction. The worst films are the ones that are directed by these flavor of month directors who have no previous Bond knowledge, like Marc Foster and the guy who directed The World is not Enough. It's a stupid trend the producers keep using. Just use Martin again

  • @cartooz2003 Uh the world is not enough was good!

  • @58fenix According to this list it was bad. I go one futher and say it is the worst if not the second worst bond film ever made behind Die Another Day. I'm not argue with the fact that A View to a Kill is the worst because it is the Batman and Robin of the series, but personally I think it's so bad it's actually fun and funny to watch. Same goes with Moonraker and Octopussy. The plots in Die Another Day and The World is not Enough are as stupid as a bad Moore Bond flick, minus the Moore fun.

  • i haven`t seen all bond movies, think i still have 5 ones left to see, but the worst until now i must say is quantum of solace.. i mean, sure it`s a good action movie, but it doesn`t work as a bond film. all the elements from what we know as 007, is gone.

  • @grindmaggots666 Thats beacuse there's a reason for that

    though!

  • the creator of this list is an absolute idiot and novice... apparently knows nothing of the Bond books or Bond films... Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker are considered the worst of the series. From Russia With Love & On Her Majesty's Secret Service are considered the Best...the best Moore bond film is For Your Eyes Only.... amateurs like the poster should be viewing his naive, inexperienced opinions on somethng he has no clue.

  • Glad to see Golden eye up there at 5. I think the Connery ones are the best but Goldeneye no 1 for me."for england james","no for me". Awesome.Plus great N64 game and hotest evil bond girl.

  • Moonraker was awsome!

  • i agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    

  • where was Never Say Never Again that was a crappy remake of thunderball where connery was like 60 in it!

  • it is not a real bond movie

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • It's october and it's officaly Bond a thon month. Each year I gather people for 10 night of Bond films. The way it works is I show two Bond films every night (except for golden night which is the 3 bond films that have gold in their title) and I try not to show them in chronological order, so I mix it up to have a Connery then a Dalton, or a Moore then a Brosnan, or OHMSS and then a Craig, etc. I mess up though and show all the Connery in the first 6 days, then ppl don't show up on the last 4.

  • @cartooz2003 I take it you dont like craig very much?

    Am I right!

  • @58fenix Craig is my second Bond behind Connery. I'm not going to show OHMSS and Casino Royale in one night because that would mean on another night I will proabably have to end up showing Quantum of Solace and Die another Day. But yeah I think Quantum of Solace was garbage straight from Jason Bourne's butt if that was what you were getting at, but I give craig a pass on that because of Casino Royale.

  • @cartooz2003 Will the reason why you saw a lot of

    that in QOS is because half of that crew was the same

    crew that worked on the bourne films.To me that does'nt

    bother at all because even if it was'nt the bourne team it

    would have still ended up that way.Craigs bond films have

    to have that type of action it fits craigs description.And it

    means its a great action film.

  • @cartooz2003 But understand we are in a different

    time for bond and it works.I dont see bourne when

    I see QOS and CR!People just dont understand whats

    really going on.QOS was awsome,Maybe its because

    I have a bomb home theater,but again it was great.As

    for DAD,one word Horrible!It cost brosnan his job!

  • @58fenix Nobody followed or looked foward to QOS more than I did. My gripe goes well beyond the Bourne shaky cam (which I don't think was in CR.) Most of my complaints can be centered around the makers of this film had no clue what tyoe of movie they were making. Okay so I'm promised it's going to be the most non Bond style film ever made, that's why he doesn't say the line "Bond, James Bond" in this movie. Okay, then why is there some one named strawberry fields and a goldfinger refrence?

  • @cartooz2003 Well for the bond line that was'nt in the

    film it was in the film.They just pulled it out because

    froster did'nt think it would work.There as to be a reason

    for it to work.And they did have a clue what they were

    doing how it was written tells how its going to be

    made.Agent fields has nothing to do to why the

    action film was so great,as for the oil scence,

    yes that did'tn work for how people were going

    to take it.They just did that for the heck of it.

  • @58fenix But yeah for what it's worth, the action sequences alone and Craig, I still like QOS a hell of a lot more than Die Another Day and The World is not Enough. All Bond films, even the bad ones, are still watchable and you can enjoy some things about them. Except for The World is not Enough, it's the only Bond film we actually shut off half way through the film during Bond A Thon because everyone got bored of it. Die Another Day isn't boring, but it gets close to shutting it off.

  • @cartooz2003 I disagree with you on the world is

    not enough.That is one of brosnan's best.Are you

    saying its not that good because your bored of it

    or because you think its bad?And what do you mean

    when you say you guys,what do you do.What do

    you mean when you say we show bond films

    for marothons?

  • @cartooz2003 CR and QOS is completely different from

    each other.Thats how its suppose to be.Bond needs to

    change in everyfilm.People dont understand this type

    of bond and the films that are made today.Its so simple

    its all about bond's beggining and how it all started.If

    you cant get that then that means maybe for another

    5 to 6 years you will be complaining.So to everyone

    GET OVER IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @58fenix If QOS action style is trying to be ultra realistic and gritty, then why are half the stunts in CG? I don't recall half the stunts in CR being CG. I thought Bond was to emotionally distraught over Vesper's death to get emotionally or physically close to anyone (isn't that the whole point of the movie), yet he pimps and scores Strawberry Fields into the sack like if he were Connery.

  • @cartooz2003 Are you kidding me?Thats one of

    the best things about it.THERE ARE NO SPECIAL

    EFFECTS!!!!Everything was done for real.Everything.

    Except for the one when they skydive.But as for action

    on ground.IT WAS REAL MY FRIEND.I dont know

    were you get your information at and what you are

    looking at but when something is done for real

    you can tell.

  • @58fenix I can go on and on with QOS, but I would forgive all of what I said if it weren't for this one thing. A James Bond film is only as good as its villains. Who are the Villains in QOS? The Hobbit from Lord of the Rings and some scrawny German with a mushroom haircut, and it looks like Craig can break them in half with one punch. They're not even smart either,when Bond breaks into the main villains place, all he has to do is jump a chained link fence. Bad villains=bad Bond film. 

  • @cartooz2003 The problem with what you are saying

    is bond is on a mission that is'nt suppose to be a

    big challenge to him yet.No tricks and no gadgets,

    just straight up kill for now.When bond finally gets

    his gadgets then that means you will see more

    dangerous tricky villians as we have seen in all

    the other bond films.I dont like dalton as bond

    but he did'nt use to many gadgets to much.I

    dont see you saying anything about him.He was

    like straight up kill has well.

  • @cartooz2003 I do have a question for you.If your

    bringing down QOS.I what you to name just one

    action film that is great to you,just one.Not a bond

    film,A action film.I am one of the biggest action

    and one of the biggest bond fan you can ever meet

    and I will tell you I know what I am talking about.

    QOS was awesome.Especially the beggining!

  • @58fenix Bond a Thons I have are usually me, some of my friends, some films school students from my school and maybe some locals who are interested if I advertise it. And yeah eveyone there that night, which was like the 8'th or 9'th night, universally agreed to turn it off because somehow the actions scenes were actually boring to us, because at that point we had watched like 15 action packed Bond films and we action scenes were not unique or compelling or suspensful.

  • @cartooz2003 If I was at your film school I would tell

    you what to put on.Are you a teacher or a student?

    What film school do you go to?I went to LA Film

    school?I what to know what action films do you

    like?I would like to know.

  • @cartooz2003 when you concider it you could mix up the entire series and still have it make sense

  • @TheDrYes Yeah that's part of the problem. For the new people who are seeing the older ones for the first time I want to show the first 7 films in order because I feel they have to be shown that way, so I make those the first films of the night for the first 7 nights. But by day ,8,9,10 I have nothing but bad Moore, and Brosnan fims left. This is why I don't include the 60's Casino Royale and Never say Never Again. I'm considering showing the Connery films out of order this year, to aviod that.

  • Everyone keeps forgetting about The Living Daylights - my all time favourite, and all time favourite theme tune

  • @gouzbekistan1 Yeah it was good!

  • The only ones which are anywhere near where I'd put them were the Brosnan ones and even then in the wrong order, Goldeneye is my all time favorate and in my opinion Dr No is better than from Russia with Love not to get into the rest of them. Nice video but I think we need to reballet.

  • 1.You Only Live Twice 2.Goldfinger 3. Thunderball 4.OHMSS 5. Dr.No 6. From Russia With Love 7.Diamonds are Forever 8.The Man With the Golden Gun 9.The Spy Who Loved Me 10.The Living Daylights or Goldeneye (11 would be Casino Royale)

  • moonraker should have been higher

  • As a huge James Bond fan, here is my top 10 James Bond films:

    1. For Your Eyes Only

    2. On Her Majesty's Secret Service

    3. The Living Daylights

    4. A View To A Kill

    5. Casino Royale

    6. Dr No

    7. The Spy Who Loved Me

    9. Octopussy

    10. Licence To Kill

  • Comment removed

  • My ranking of the Bond films by actor go like this: Sean Connery: 1. Dr No 2. Goldfinger 3. You Only Live Twice 4. From Russia With Love 5. Thunderball 6. Diamonds Are Forever Roger Moore: 1. For Your Eyes Only 2. A View To A Kill 3. Octopussy 4. The Spy Who Loved Me 5. Moonraker 6. Live And Let Die 7. The Man With The Golden Gun Timothy Dalton: 1. The Living Daylights 2. Licence To Kill Pierce Brosnan: 1. Goldeneye 2. TWINE 3. Tomorrow Never Dies Daniel Craig: 1. CR 2. QOS
  • 20 octopussy 19 tomorrow never dies 18 moonraker 17 a view to a kill 16 die another day 15 the world is not enough 14 for your eyes only 13 on her majestys secret service 12 the living daylights 11 the man with the golden gun 10 live and let die 9 licence to kill 8 diamonds are forever 7 goldeneye 6 thunderall 5 dr no 4 from russia with love 3 goldfinger 2 the spy who loved me 1 you only live twice