wait a minute, i just realized that the upper dots are on the other tower. watch :10-:12 over and over, you can see these are simultaneous flashes on both towers. Ok, i admit, that is very wierd, given that its the exact spot where the plane emerges.
if you look at the oppisite corner at about a 45 degree angle up from the dots where the plane comes out you will see more dots just below the smoke. they flash simultaneously with the lower dots kitty corner 10 stories down where the plane comes out. My guess is this probable has something to do with a ripple effect in the building from the impact of the entry point of the plane before it emerges.
This is my view. There was a terrorist attack in Madrid the 11th of January and that building burned for days. and never collapsed. Maybe the same people were involved in it but wanted to make a bigger problem, by using bombs and missiles on the plane to blow the towers up causing the towers to collaspe...
Query on the internet: docid=-2859455565562890133 ( laser dot goes across WTC2 and foreground building) Then see Youtube video: 911 LASER POINTER Then query on the internet: serendipity + bollyn1 Then see the end of this Youtube video: FOOLED AGAIN ON 9/11 showing a chopper emitting a very intense light source leaving the scene of the WTC2 impact. Connect the dots.
By far the most ironic thing I have seen today is people making misleading videos, using at best sophistry and at worst blatant lies, to try and prove authentic footage false. I find it insulting that you treat me and the rest of humanity as such incompetents. You ought to be ashamed of yourself. Play your mind games on rats, it is less harmful and you might get more satisfaction out of it.
its probably phtoshopped or some shit but think of the change in air pressure as the plane hits, it would blow out windows...however i do believe charges were placed in there
I see no dots - I see artifacts from either one of the three CCD imagers in the camera or noise produced in the electronics before it is encoded on the tape, or the fact that we're playing this really slow frame by frame and somewhere in the encoding process someone saw something they think is a laser pointer.
Why can't people just believe that we really were attacked by terrorists and move on with their lives?
just because it is not true...have a look about all 4 attacks...do you find somenting strange? or have a look what "casus belli" means...you'll find your answer! 9/11 is the biggest lie, I mean the worst and bastard lie ever! the only true thing are the poor people who dead there, and the poor people who are still dying in all over the worl for that unfair war!!
I'll agree that the quality of this video isn't the greatest, but those arent digital artifacts and it's not noise. If you follow the links to some of the other clips of this same footage, this will become clear to you.
Not really... the same thing happened to one of my video's and my numbers went through the roof. The only problem, is that people who have surfing filters on their PCs won't be able to access flagged video's at all.
I HEARD BOOM AN EXPLODING SOUND, REAL LOUD BANG . I LOOKED UP AND COULD SEE THE TRADE CENTER STARTING TO COME DOWN. THE SOUTH TOWER WHICH I GUESS WAS ABOUT BLOCK AWAY FROM. I saw STUFF COMING OFF THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING. IT LOOKED LIKE A GIANT FOUNTAIN
"At 10:30 I tried to leave the building, but as I got outside I heard a second explosion and another rumble and more smoke and more dust. I ran inside the building and the chandelier shook and again black smoke filled the air. Within another five minutes we were covered again with more soot and more dust. And then a fire marshal came in and said we had to leave, because if there was a third explosion this building might not last.."
the caption in the beginning says the "dot [appears] on the north tower as the fire ball grows upward". That's incorrect and I'm amazed who ever made this didn't notice that there is a "dot" popping in and out of view on the north tower throughout the whole clip.
Ytube titles below (in caps) - 2 separate camera angles of an infrared target beacon used a "nudger" to tune the course of the 2nd impacting aircraft:
2ND HIT - "LASER DOT SHOT" (side angle)
IMPACTS OF THE PLANES INTO WTC 1 & WTC 2 (frontal)
Digital cameras with the "hot mirror" filter turned off see IR. 2nd video dot can be seen continuing to track on the smoke ball and then the shaded side of a building in the foreground.
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go
The flashes could either be reflections from the sun or from the fire. There is absolutely no reason to say that a random flash on glass is an explosive. Think people. I honestly believe that you would have to be insane in some way to see a random flash on glass and think explosive, and conspiracy
Assistant Fire Commissioner: "I thought . . . before . . . No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . . I . . . saw a flash flash flash . . . [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they . . . blow up a building. . . ?"
# NYC firefighter: "It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. . . [W]e originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down."
It is Clear that the white flashes are charges goin off in the buildings before the plane hits.. the evidence is piling up....the 911 drug is wearing off!!!
it's also too bad the vid here has such a low frame rate. if it were higher we might be able to ID the flashes. hell it's so slow it doesn't even catch the plane
passenger planes are not nimble to quick corrections....it is harder than one would think to a a building....go to NYC look at a tall building and try to walk to it...its harder than you think....
First off, I firmly believe that 9/11 was an inside job and kerosene can't melt steel. An secondly; if those were lazers, they are used to "Paint" a potential target for the "Lazer Guided" missle to home in on. Nobody with 1/2 a brain thinks 9/11 was done by cavemen. Sorry, I don't buy it.
It is an easy target to miss, when you're going 500mph. At that speed you don't get a 2nd chance. Knowing this and knowing that those who "Supposedly" flew those planes were amatures at best, there is NO WAY they could have hit their targets. I just don't trust the as*holes in D.C. --- Never have...never will.
It should be possible to use the magnitude and timing of the reflection to get a reading on deflection. This might be used to get a better read on the speed of impact.
dumb ass those arent laser shots those lil dots u see are the impact of the plane going into the towers befor the fuel blew up look real closely and u can see...u really really need to think befor u post up videos u peice of shit
The pancake theory does not stand up to the laws of physics or Newton's law of gravity. The towers cannot accelerate in their fall without an additional charge of force such as an explosion from construction detonations. The towers should not have accerlerated in their fall. All the rivets cannot collapse simultaneously without placed charges. Both towers can visibly be seen collapsing like they were demolished. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
No lasers hit the towers they were both 2 jet planes. However a second before the second plane hit there's an explosion from the 2nd tower before the plane even hits the tower. A few weeks before the 911 attack, the people working in the building on certain floors heard heavy objects moved around in them and loud banging noises like something was being moved into position. Who was in charge of the twin tower security before the 911 attack? George Bush's brother!
Take note, Pentagon hit = plane vapourising. Ground Hit = Plane vapourising. WTC Hit = Flimsy plane passing through steel reinforced concrete, 47 steel girders, another steel reinforced concrete wall and exiting the other side, and then causing basement explosions, and weakening a 100 storey steel reinforced concrete building so fast it vapourises in 10 seconds and produces Thermate in the debris. Duh?
omfg stfu guys KWLERD is right it is the sun not laser pointers dumbass and stop trying to figure 911 out it happend in the past its over ok just 4get dam americans
look, even if I don't question the stupidity of suggesting that a laser was used to bring down the towers, if those dots were where the laser hit why is the fireball going outwards? i mean this is something a 6-year-old could see through, and you guys buy into it
Military took over the live TV video feed. They made some mistakes with the computer-generated plane images. For instance, the nosecone is broadcast passng through the entire tower, totally undamaged. It's a coverup.
Look up who the editor of popular mechanics is, that article never addressed the HARDCORE aspect of things. Which is TV fakery. They just lumped everything together with the pod theory and other stuff that true researchers had abandoned or never took seriously.
So you want me to believe that ALL the footage ever shown on TV is a fake; that those planes were ALL digitally edited. Thousands of people were actually there on 9/11, they actually saw the planes impact. Why aren't there hundreds of firsthand witnesses coming foreward saying they saw a missile or that the plane looked totally wrong? If the planes looked right to begin with, there would be no need to edit the footage right?
The glaring errors in this paper astound me. Aside from Gerard listing NO sources, he makes wild claims with no proof to back them up. His attempt to explain away the plane by saying the fuel wasn't hot enough, that there was no wreckage, and that there wasn't enough fuel to cause the damage are ALL WRONG. You don't have to melt steel for it to fail. As it gets hot it weakens. He denounces the claims of experts with no credible proof of his own. Lame.
thanks for posting this. The laser guidance system may be the next breakthrough in the 9-11 truth movement. Has grahambcp ever heard of new technology?
here is another clip showing the laser targeting...
What "new" technology? Laser targeting is old news. What you don't seem to realize is that what you see in movies isn't true. It's not a big red dot on the target. Those lasers are in the infrared spectrum. You can't see them on a cam-corder nor with the naked eye. It's pretty dumb to shine a red light visible from a mile away on your target. The light on the other vid is the planes reflection.
First off P&T are in showbiz, so whatever their opinion is really makes no difference to me. Secondly, I don't know if the dot of light is actually a laser, yes it's implied in the title. But the video itself ends w/ a ?
Yes P&T is showbiz. They make a few valid points about a lot of nutjobs who can't even coherently explain their own theories. That's why I reference the Pop. Mech. piece, since that holds a lot more technical data, all of which is referenced. Also if you have no idea what that dot is, why in the hell would you make the HUGE jump directly to conspiracy?
I see sun flickering off of glass. I see artifacts from a fuzzy video and file compression. I see the result of two planes slamming into a building. I see thousands dead. That's what I see. What do you see?
You think it's odd? I think it's odd that you have "noplanes" as a tag in a video documenting an event where two jet aircraft crashed into a building.
What is the point of this vid? What's your message to the world?
I see an explosion. I see a bright dot flashing on and off at the location of, and just prior to that explosion. What I don't see is an aircraft. My message to the world is we no longer have a free press. EVERYTHING you see on tv is complete bullshit.Watch September Clues 1-4.
Make ya a deal; I'll watch those, and you watch either Penn&Tellers Bullshit on conspiracy theories, or, if you want harder stuff, look up Popular Mechanics story that debunks 16 of the most common 9/11 myths. It can be easily googled.
You imply that I have not looked. I have. I've read many reports, seen a lot of nuts make insane theories based on ignorance. You think this 47 seconds will lead you to the truth?
pokemon !
elevenfingures 3 years ago
wait a minute, i just realized that the upper dots are on the other tower. watch :10-:12 over and over, you can see these are simultaneous flashes on both towers. Ok, i admit, that is very wierd, given that its the exact spot where the plane emerges.
grom0007 3 years ago
if you look at the oppisite corner at about a 45 degree angle up from the dots where the plane comes out you will see more dots just below the smoke. they flash simultaneously with the lower dots kitty corner 10 stories down where the plane comes out. My guess is this probable has something to do with a ripple effect in the building from the impact of the entry point of the plane before it emerges.
grom0007 3 years ago
See paxromana211's comment (4 down). I could not have said it better!
graypony4 3 years ago
This is my view. There was a terrorist attack in Madrid the 11th of January and that building burned for days. and never collapsed. Maybe the same people were involved in it but wanted to make a bigger problem, by using bombs and missiles on the plane to blow the towers up causing the towers to collaspe...
Permanentlystupid10 3 years ago
Theburrowingid 3 years ago
these videos are made by fucking fags who have no life so they choose something that would piss people off just for attention
kidwithdrums 3 years ago
By far the most ironic thing I have seen today is people making misleading videos, using at best sophistry and at worst blatant lies, to try and prove authentic footage false. I find it insulting that you treat me and the rest of humanity as such incompetents. You ought to be ashamed of yourself. Play your mind games on rats, it is less harmful and you might get more satisfaction out of it.
paxromana211 3 years ago
yeah lets flag this shit. you fucking idiots
fasdl 3 years ago 2
ITS CALLED AN EXPOLTION DUMB ASS
donkeyfart123 4 years ago
its probably phtoshopped or some shit but think of the change in air pressure as the plane hits, it would blow out windows...however i do believe charges were placed in there
jcobaltss2005 4 years ago
Query on the internet:
docid=-2859455565562890133
Then see Youtube video:
911 LASER POINTER
Then query on the internet:
serendipity + bollyn1
Then see the end of this Youtube video:
FOOLED AGAIN ON 9/11 showing a chopper emitting a very intense light source leaving the scene of the WTC2 impact.
Connect the dots.
Theburrowingid 4 years ago
I see no dots - I see artifacts from either one of the three CCD imagers in the camera or noise produced in the electronics before it is encoded on the tape, or the fact that we're playing this really slow frame by frame and somewhere in the encoding process someone saw something they think is a laser pointer.
Why can't people just believe that we really were attacked by terrorists and move on with their lives?
pmgodfrey 4 years ago
just because it is not true...have a look about all 4 attacks...do you find somenting strange? or have a look what "casus belli" means...you'll find your answer! 9/11 is the biggest lie, I mean the worst and bastard lie ever! the only true thing are the poor people who dead there, and the poor people who are still dying in all over the worl for that unfair war!!
giam11 4 years ago
I'll agree that the quality of this video isn't the greatest, but those arent digital artifacts and it's not noise. If you follow the links to some of the other clips of this same footage, this will become clear to you.
djjimi 4 years ago
At first I thought the video was the most ignorant thing I had ever seen. Then I read the comments.
72javelin 4 years ago
why the fuck would anybody flag this video?
roboplant 4 years ago 2
Because it contains something that the neocons don't want you to see.
djjimi 4 years ago
not very effective as it seems
mpjswart 4 years ago
Not really... the same thing happened to one of my video's and my numbers went through the roof. The only problem, is that people who have surfing filters on their PCs won't be able to access flagged video's at all.
djjimi 4 years ago
BATTALION CHIEF THOMAS VALLEBUONA
WTC2
I HEARD BOOM AN EXPLODING SOUND, REAL LOUD BANG . I LOOKED UP AND COULD SEE THE TRADE CENTER STARTING TO COME DOWN. THE SOUTH TOWER WHICH I GUESS WAS ABOUT BLOCK AWAY FROM. I saw STUFF COMING OFF THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING. IT LOOKED LIKE A GIANT FOUNTAIN
hgfbob 4 years ago 2
# MSNBC Reporter, Ann Thompson:
"At 10:30 I tried to leave the building, but as I got outside I heard a second explosion and another rumble and more smoke and more dust. I ran inside the building and the chandelier shook and again black smoke filled the air. Within another five minutes we were covered again with more soot and more dust. And then a fire marshal came in and said we had to leave, because if there was a third explosion this building might not last.."
hgfbob 4 years ago
Notice how hot spots are perfectly aligned with the laser homing beacon's exit off corner of WTC2 in this Youtube video:
2ND HIT - "LASER DOT SHOT"
Theburrowingid 4 years ago
the caption in the beginning says the "dot [appears] on the north tower as the fire ball grows upward". That's incorrect and I'm amazed who ever made this didn't notice that there is a "dot" popping in and out of view on the north tower throughout the whole clip.
jiggymonkey 4 years ago
Ytube titles below (in caps) - 2 separate camera angles of an infrared target beacon used a "nudger" to tune the course of the 2nd impacting aircraft:
2ND HIT - "LASER DOT SHOT" (side angle)
IMPACTS OF THE PLANES INTO WTC 1 & WTC 2 (frontal)
Digital cameras with the "hot mirror" filter turned off see IR. 2nd video dot can be seen continuing to track on the smoke ball and then the shaded side of a building in the foreground.
Also see Youtube video. IT WAS A MILITARY PLANE!
Theburrowingid 4 years ago
woo thats weird, the dot is right at the explosion location...crazy shit..
photofu 4 years ago
The people and the firefighters said that there were numerous explosions all around them as they were trying to get out of the buildings.
TheHillbillaryShow 4 years ago 2
CAPTAIN JAY SWITHERS EMS
WTC2
At that point I looked back and most of the people who were triaged in that area with the triage tags on them got up and ran. I took a quick glance at the building and while I didn't see it falling, I saw a large section of it blasting out, which led me to believe it was just an explosion. I thought it was a secondary device, but I knew that we had to go
hgfbob 4 years ago 2
The flashes could either be reflections from the sun or from the fire. There is absolutely no reason to say that a random flash on glass is an explosive. Think people. I honestly believe that you would have to be insane in some way to see a random flash on glass and think explosive, and conspiracy
ninjawithspoons 4 years ago
Assistant Fire Commissioner: "I thought . . . before . . . No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . . I . . . saw a flash flash flash . . . [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they . . . blow up a building. . . ?"
nytimes. com/packages/html...ry_Stephen.txt
hgfbob 4 years ago
# NYC firefighter: "It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. . . [W]e originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down."
nytimes. com/packages/html...hia_Edward.txt
hgfbob 4 years ago 2
It is Clear that the white flashes are charges goin off in the buildings before the plane hits.. the evidence is piling up....the 911 drug is wearing off!!!
jonnysilver312 4 years ago
too bad all the lasers used by the military are INVISIBLE TO THE NAKED EYE.
but don't let facts get in the way, just as they never have
wargammer4000 4 years ago
it's also too bad the vid here has such a low frame rate. if it were higher we might be able to ID the flashes. hell it's so slow it doesn't even catch the plane
jiggymonkey 4 years ago
That's because the plane is already inside the tower. The video starts at the point when the plane has already penetrated the tower.
sjvietboy408 4 years ago
I think there where missiles planted and the flashing you can see is someone getting them ready for the plane to set them off.
LondonCAFC 4 years ago
passenger planes are not nimble to quick corrections....it is harder than one would think to a a building....go to NYC look at a tall building and try to walk to it...its harder than you think....
hopups 4 years ago
laserguided bunker buster missiles , no planes .
media faked the footage .
watch september clues 1 - 8
horror11 4 years ago
There are other instances of this laser...
This is, sad to say, the key in knowing what really happened. I was told by an official what happened...
But this video and there ARE others...proves it was a fucked up conspiracy.
zafada 4 years ago
First off, I firmly believe that 9/11 was an inside job and kerosene can't melt steel. An secondly; if those were lazers, they are used to "Paint" a potential target for the "Lazer Guided" missle to home in on. Nobody with 1/2 a brain thinks 9/11 was done by cavemen. Sorry, I don't buy it.
senecaco170 4 years ago
fool...
steel looses strength as its temp rises.
do you think they make the towers out of some magic compound or the cheapest stuff that will do the job.
just like the Titanic, they are designed to have enough strength and a little more for safety.
wargammer4000 4 years ago
feeble arguement... steel in such a structure cannot melt from a fire of this kind. Research this
joegreaser 4 years ago
speaking of feeble, steel doesn't have to be in a liquid state (ie, molten) for it to bend.
jiggymonkey 4 years ago
If you watch the corner of the other tower DURING the fireball, you can see more of these 'sparkles' ...
I'm not dismissing anything - I'm part of 9/11 Truth, just noticing more sparkles in other places....that's all.
HecticEclectic 4 years ago
that is the refletion of the sun but it makes you think
dx1599 4 years ago
Those are small detonations, going of before the impact..
Farshad1975 4 years ago
Lasers or not i doubt the guys flyin the plane used them, they wouldnt even need them a large tower isnt hard to miss with a passenger plane
RobWomg 4 years ago
It is an easy target to miss, when you're going 500mph. At that speed you don't get a 2nd chance. Knowing this and knowing that those who "Supposedly" flew those planes were amatures at best, there is NO WAY they could have hit their targets. I just don't trust the as*holes in D.C. --- Never have...never will.
senecaco170 4 years ago
Plus the aircraft cant fly 500mph @ 700 ft altitude, it's impossible
Hartbilt 4 years ago
i see dots before that explosion
isiteusa 4 years ago
Huh ?
thatguywithnohair 4 years ago
no veo nada en el video
jeansitix 4 years ago
It should be possible to use the magnitude and timing of the reflection to get a reading on deflection. This might be used to get a better read on the speed of impact.
xp1234567890 4 years ago
i don't see any lasers
DrBenKBen 4 years ago
dumb ass those arent laser shots those lil dots u see are the impact of the plane going into the towers befor the fuel blew up look real closely and u can see...u really really need to think befor u post up videos u peice of shit
yoyoyoyoyooyoy 4 years ago
The pancake theory does not stand up to the laws of physics or Newton's law of gravity. The towers cannot accelerate in their fall without an additional charge of force such as an explosion from construction detonations. The towers should not have accerlerated in their fall. All the rivets cannot collapse simultaneously without placed charges. Both towers can visibly be seen collapsing like they were demolished. WAKE UP PEOPLE!
WARSTRIKE1 4 years ago 4
No lasers hit the towers they were both 2 jet planes. However a second before the second plane hit there's an explosion from the 2nd tower before the plane even hits the tower. A few weeks before the 911 attack, the people working in the building on certain floors heard heavy objects moved around in them and loud banging noises like something was being moved into position. Who was in charge of the twin tower security before the 911 attack? George Bush's brother!
WARSTRIKE1 4 years ago 2
yea lame bad graphics...weird laser on this one...
wasy35 4 years ago
Take note, Pentagon hit = plane vapourising. Ground Hit = Plane vapourising. WTC Hit = Flimsy plane passing through steel reinforced concrete, 47 steel girders, another steel reinforced concrete wall and exiting the other side, and then causing basement explosions, and weakening a 100 storey steel reinforced concrete building so fast it vapourises in 10 seconds and produces Thermate in the debris. Duh?
wibblywobbly1 4 years ago 2
I find it funny how people think its a conspiracy.
It was muslim terrorists who flew two comercial airliners into the twin towers after hijacking them.
HuwRichards 4 years ago
What evidence proves that?
RandleEl11 4 years ago
omfg stfu guys KWLERD is right it is the sun not laser pointers dumbass and stop trying to figure 911 out it happend in the past its over ok just 4get dam americans
dozzyozzy12 4 years ago
look, even if I don't question the stupidity of suggesting that a laser was used to bring down the towers, if those dots were where the laser hit why is the fireball going outwards? i mean this is something a 6-year-old could see through, and you guys buy into it
xdamousex 4 years ago
If those were lasers pointing at the buildings,how come their's footage of the hijacked plans hitting the towers? Think about that dipshit!
sadaddy24eva 4 years ago
Military took over the live TV video feed. They made some mistakes with the computer-generated plane images. For instance, the nosecone is broadcast passng through the entire tower, totally undamaged. It's a coverup.
Search: September Clues 1
ozzybinoswaldo 4 years ago
ozzy: Uh huh... Military took over the live TV video. Proof of that is...where? Oh. Speculation. I see.
chaoscleaner 4 years ago
Look up who the editor of popular mechanics is, that article never addressed the HARDCORE aspect of things. Which is TV fakery. They just lumped everything together with the pod theory and other stuff that true researchers had abandoned or never took seriously.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
So you want me to believe that ALL the footage ever shown on TV is a fake; that those planes were ALL digitally edited. Thousands of people were actually there on 9/11, they actually saw the planes impact. Why aren't there hundreds of firsthand witnesses coming foreward saying they saw a missile or that the plane looked totally wrong? If the planes looked right to begin with, there would be no need to edit the footage right?
grahambcp 4 years ago
You need to read up on Gerard Holmgren's articles. I dare you to read his stuff. Go.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
The glaring errors in this paper astound me. Aside from Gerard listing NO sources, he makes wild claims with no proof to back them up. His attempt to explain away the plane by saying the fuel wasn't hot enough, that there was no wreckage, and that there wasn't enough fuel to cause the damage are ALL WRONG. You don't have to melt steel for it to fail. As it gets hot it weakens. He denounces the claims of experts with no credible proof of his own. Lame.
grahambcp 4 years ago
thanks for posting this. The laser guidance system may be the next breakthrough in the 9-11 truth movement. Has grahambcp ever heard of new technology?
here is another clip showing the laser targeting...
youtube dot com/watch?v=xB0msfbPecE
tzolkin2013 4 years ago
What "new" technology? Laser targeting is old news. What you don't seem to realize is that what you see in movies isn't true. It's not a big red dot on the target. Those lasers are in the infrared spectrum. You can't see them on a cam-corder nor with the naked eye. It's pretty dumb to shine a red light visible from a mile away on your target. The light on the other vid is the planes reflection.
grahambcp 4 years ago
First off P&T are in showbiz, so whatever their opinion is really makes no difference to me. Secondly, I don't know if the dot of light is actually a laser, yes it's implied in the title. But the video itself ends w/ a ?
guntherznadz 4 years ago
Yes P&T is showbiz. They make a few valid points about a lot of nutjobs who can't even coherently explain their own theories. That's why I reference the Pop. Mech. piece, since that holds a lot more technical data, all of which is referenced. Also if you have no idea what that dot is, why in the hell would you make the HUGE jump directly to conspiracy?
grahambcp 4 years ago
A) If you don't see the dots your blind
B) I'm not implying anything, I just find it a bit odd that they happen to appear at the exact location of the explosion.
C)Does my pointless 911 vid really need YOUR retarded comments?
guntherznadz 4 years ago
I see sun flickering off of glass. I see artifacts from a fuzzy video and file compression. I see the result of two planes slamming into a building. I see thousands dead. That's what I see. What do you see?
You think it's odd? I think it's odd that you have "noplanes" as a tag in a video documenting an event where two jet aircraft crashed into a building.
What is the point of this vid? What's your message to the world?
grahambcp 4 years ago
I see an explosion. I see a bright dot flashing on and off at the location of, and just prior to that explosion. What I don't see is an aircraft. My message to the world is we no longer have a free press. EVERYTHING you see on tv is complete bullshit.Watch September Clues 1-4.
guntherznadz 4 years ago
Make ya a deal; I'll watch those, and you watch either Penn&Tellers Bullshit on conspiracy theories, or, if you want harder stuff, look up Popular Mechanics story that debunks 16 of the most common 9/11 myths. It can be easily googled.
grahambcp 4 years ago
those arnt dots, its the sun reflecting off the side of the building
KWLERD 4 years ago
A) I don't see any dots.
B) If you are implying that these dots were for laser guided weaponry, those lasers aren't in the visible spectrum.
C) What the hell are you actually trying to proove? Do we need yet another pointless 9/11 vid? Have some respect for the people that died that day.
grahambcp 4 years ago
If there is something to find.. find out about it bunch of dead people or not.
Finding out the 'truth' is part of respecting the dead.
Using the respect of the dead as a reason not to look is worse than saying it was a purple jesus dinosaur who was behind the whole 911 issue
Happydude11 4 years ago
You imply that I have not looked. I have. I've read many reports, seen a lot of nuts make insane theories based on ignorance. You think this 47 seconds will lead you to the truth?
grahambcp 4 years ago
I thought that when a laser guided bomb is dropped "Like the one on the South Tower, according to the conspirasts" you cant see the laser?
KWLERD 4 years ago