micro evolution-is variations whithin the kind's,bvb,big dog,small dog,long hair dog,but still the same kind of animal.this is science,the have observed this.
micro evolution-is variations whithin the kind'.a dog produce a dog meby small or big but still a dog:macro evolution-is a animal change into anoter animal.a dog turn slowly in a kat for exapel.so it a huge differend.
Oh Jesus... No Biologist would made such a example for evolution. If a dog would change into a cat that would be a miracle and would male me a believer^^
No evolution means that a population of animals of one species changes for some reason (maybe climate, different environment and so on) over the generations fitting better to there new situation. Not the animals decide that, it happens through selection. And after a longtime you have a new species.
@gastarbeiter1 well you are right about the animal adapt to his environment ,true natural selection we call that variation in between kinds.hope you understand that is just a example that cats turn into dogs,what it mean is that a animal never produce a different animal then its own kind.science have never observe that a animal make complete new species.still to day dog produce dogs and cats produce cats.
But nobody says that you would gave birth to another species. The whole poulation is always changing, every mutation in your stemcells changes a bit of the next generation, so you would never knew that there is a change. And also where do you make the line between variation and a new species?
@gastarbeiter1 o yah variation is normal.the line is (example: we have big dog,small dog,long hair dog,short hair dog,but it still is a dog the dog do not have the mutation that it produce another kind of animal.all what natural selection does is selecting,if a dog is in cold conditions then it will slowly adapt to environment because the information already exist in the DNA.but it cant evolve to a complete new species,because where the information comes from? it cant we never have observe that
Micro and Macro are not the same thing. Both words aren't synonyms nor any dictionary or book define them as being the same. To introduce time as a factor to mark a difference between the two is completely ridiculous because all I have to do to observe the micro world is grab a microscope and look what happens there and to observe the macro world all I have to do is lift up my eyes from the microscope and look at the room where I'm standing. Organisms behave differently in the micro environment.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Have you ever walk a short distance and then walked a long one the basic mechanism is the same for both; one step in continuation can become a multitude and equal long distance. The same goes for evolution, micro and macro are not different in terms of the mechanism involved the only real difference is time. Yes time is a factor regardless and it is in any field of science.
Note Macro is just a whole lot of Micro, I'll never be able to understand why creationists do not understand this.
Once again I repeat the same until you stop creating and molding your own pinky world. This doesn't have anything to do with being a Creationist or not. Micro and Macro are not the same thing. Micro-organisms are subject to a completely different environment than that to which animals and humans are subject to. This is a scientific fact. We breathe air which has a certain composition and have certain breeding and feeding habits. Micro-organisms are subject to completely different environments.
To try and force the idea that somehow our species and that of animals develop, and/or mutate like micro-organisms is simply not true and impossible. The USGS scientific community discovered how certain micro-organisms mutate and survive in an arsenic environment. Proteobacterias often live and use Hydrogen Release Compounds for growth. The bacillus can exist in polylactates. Microorganism are often use in water treatment because they feed on pollutants and other noxious native micro-organisms.
I can give you many more examples of micro-organism environments and I can assure you that it is a great mistake to assume that what happens at the micro-level would remotely apply to what happens in the world of complex species: the world outside the microscope. Our environment and feeding habits are completely different than that of micro-organisms. Most micro-organisms don't even use or need oxygen in order to survive, multiply, grow and mutate. This evolution theory is simply a lie & a hoax.
And about your example, you said: "Have you ever walk a short distance and then walked a long one the basic mechanism is the same for both"
MoooHamMad: long walks and short ones are the same as long as you are subject to the same environment like breathing air. What would happen if you wear a sealed outfit filled with hydrogen cyanide? Would you be able to walk at least 30 steps? There is a "WALL" between these 2 worlds (micro and macro) and it is the environment that surrounds them.
You obviously don't know anything about evolution as micro and macro are terms made up for evolution not by scientists but by people attacking evolution. Please show me this undeniable proof that 'macro' evolution doesn't happen?
They're exactly the same thing, same processes going on, the ONLY difference is the scale of time between the two.
1)I know more about your ridiculous theory of evolution than you may think. Words are created to define certain properties, conditions, and things of this world. The word micro and macro wasn't invented by any anti-evolutionist. Once again you prove that you know nothing of what you speak and like a zealot, you feel angry when someone criticizes your religious cult of Evolution.
2)All dictionaries define Micro as this: micro-. prefix. Definition:. 1. small, minute microcosm. 2. using a microscope or requiring magnification microbiology. As you can see, the word micro was created to describe this other "universe" that exists but can't be seen by the naked eye. Macro is defined as this: mac-ro adj. 1. Of great size; large. 2. Large in scope or extent; large-scale.
3)Basically the word macro defines everything that falls out of the micro category so it can seen by the naked eye. Thus, every species that lives in this world that we can see with our naked eye is part of the macrocosm. But I understand your need of mixing the two words macro and micro or even going as far as to have the guts & dementia to deny the need for the existence of these 2 words: because their 2 different definitions crumble your little theory into dust and you know it. Ha, ha, ha.
4)So sad, but don't worry, this quasi-true, quasi-false theory of Evolution will not last long. Too many people are learning the fake circular logic behind it. The fossil records that supposedly back up evolution are dated, based on a dubious geological column. When evolutionists are asked what they used to define the age of each layer, they claim it's based on the fossil record. But wait a minute, wasn't the age of the fossils based on the geological column?
5)So, if the geological column defines the age of the fossils, how come the fossils define the age of the layers of the geological column? And that's when people discover that all those ridiculous numbers of millions or billions of years used to define the age of fossils were pulled out of some evolutionist's ass, ROFLMAO. Circular logic is another pathetic flaw found in the theory-cult-religion of evolution. Like I said before, evolution is useless in science. Creationism is a better theory.
"geological column defines the age of the fossils, how come the fossils define the age of the layers of the geological column?"
That isn't remotely true, what you are revering to is relative dating techniques that state if you date something anything above it is younger and anything below it is older. Do you do objective research before you spout whatever Kent Hovind tells you?
Emulate a macro-environment inside the micro-world and notice how evolution all of a sudden stops in these micro-organisms. The Evolution theory is completely useless and hasn't helped science in the least. It's not a scientific law which is a universal truth. In fact, if we destroy this ridiculous Atheist cult of Evolution that is forced these days unto people we will still continue to make great advances in science. Evolution is meaningless, nothing, a simple tool of deceit, a cult.
"In fact, if we destroy this ridiculous Atheist cult of Evolution that is forced these days unto people we will still continue to make great advances in science. Evolution is meaningless, nothing, a simple tool of deceit, a cult."
You've just shown yourself to be a complete ignorant delusional fanatic, have a good day.
micro evolution-is variations whithin the kind's,bvb,big dog,small dog,long hair dog,but still the same kind of animal.this is science,the have observed this.
jesusLostChildren777 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Micro and Macro are the same, the only real difference is time.
sweatytoothmadman 3 years ago
micro evolution-is variations whithin the kind'.a dog produce a dog meby small or big but still a dog:macro evolution-is a animal change into anoter animal.a dog turn slowly in a kat for exapel.so it a huge differend.
jesusLostChildren777 3 years ago
Evolution does not say you can turn a dog into a cat. It says they have a common ancestor, the first mammal.
gregrutz 2 years ago
@jesusLostChildren777
Oh Jesus... No Biologist would made such a example for evolution. If a dog would change into a cat that would be a miracle and would male me a believer^^
No evolution means that a population of animals of one species changes for some reason (maybe climate, different environment and so on) over the generations fitting better to there new situation. Not the animals decide that, it happens through selection. And after a longtime you have a new species.
gastarbeiter1 11 months ago
@gastarbeiter1 well you are right about the animal adapt to his environment ,true natural selection we call that variation in between kinds.hope you understand that is just a example that cats turn into dogs,what it mean is that a animal never produce a different animal then its own kind.science have never observe that a animal make complete new species.still to day dog produce dogs and cats produce cats.
jesusLostChildren777 11 months ago
@jesusLostChildren777
But nobody says that you would gave birth to another species. The whole poulation is always changing, every mutation in your stemcells changes a bit of the next generation, so you would never knew that there is a change. And also where do you make the line between variation and a new species?
gastarbeiter1 11 months ago
@gastarbeiter1 o yah variation is normal.the line is (example: we have big dog,small dog,long hair dog,short hair dog,but it still is a dog the dog do not have the mutation that it produce another kind of animal.all what natural selection does is selecting,if a dog is in cold conditions then it will slowly adapt to environment because the information already exist in the DNA.but it cant evolve to a complete new species,because where the information comes from? it cant we never have observe that
jesusLostChildren777 11 months ago
@jesusLostChildren777
Well do I get an answer?
gastarbeiter1 11 months ago
Micro and Macro are not the same thing. Both words aren't synonyms nor any dictionary or book define them as being the same. To introduce time as a factor to mark a difference between the two is completely ridiculous because all I have to do to observe the micro world is grab a microscope and look what happens there and to observe the macro world all I have to do is lift up my eyes from the microscope and look at the room where I'm standing. Organisms behave differently in the micro environment.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Have you ever walk a short distance and then walked a long one the basic mechanism is the same for both; one step in continuation can become a multitude and equal long distance. The same goes for evolution, micro and macro are not different in terms of the mechanism involved the only real difference is time. Yes time is a factor regardless and it is in any field of science.
Note Macro is just a whole lot of Micro, I'll never be able to understand why creationists do not understand this.
sweatytoothmadman 3 years ago
Once again I repeat the same until you stop creating and molding your own pinky world. This doesn't have anything to do with being a Creationist or not. Micro and Macro are not the same thing. Micro-organisms are subject to a completely different environment than that to which animals and humans are subject to. This is a scientific fact. We breathe air which has a certain composition and have certain breeding and feeding habits. Micro-organisms are subject to completely different environments.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago 5
To try and force the idea that somehow our species and that of animals develop, and/or mutate like micro-organisms is simply not true and impossible. The USGS scientific community discovered how certain micro-organisms mutate and survive in an arsenic environment. Proteobacterias often live and use Hydrogen Release Compounds for growth. The bacillus can exist in polylactates. Microorganism are often use in water treatment because they feed on pollutants and other noxious native micro-organisms.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago 6
I can give you many more examples of micro-organism environments and I can assure you that it is a great mistake to assume that what happens at the micro-level would remotely apply to what happens in the world of complex species: the world outside the microscope. Our environment and feeding habits are completely different than that of micro-organisms. Most micro-organisms don't even use or need oxygen in order to survive, multiply, grow and mutate. This evolution theory is simply a lie & a hoax.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago 5
@MoooHamMad
Wow you mixed up evolution and organism. Nice one.
gastarbeiter1 11 months ago
And about your example, you said: "Have you ever walk a short distance and then walked a long one the basic mechanism is the same for both"
MoooHamMad: long walks and short ones are the same as long as you are subject to the same environment like breathing air. What would happen if you wear a sealed outfit filled with hydrogen cyanide? Would you be able to walk at least 30 steps? There is a "WALL" between these 2 worlds (micro and macro) and it is the environment that surrounds them.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago 8
Do you accept that dog is related to wolf?
jasason10 2 years ago
macro evolution-is a animal change into anoter animal.the never observend it, so its not science you need faith to believe in it.
jesusLostChildren777 3 years ago
Nice, moving the goal post for transitional forms eh?
I'll ask you to read:
talkorigins(dot)org/faqs/macroevolution(com)html#falsifying
and,
talkorigins(com)org/faqs/comdesc/
All the way through please.
Di66en6ion 3 years ago
The scope of this argument is so ignorant. Why would you expect to see a cat turn into a dog in one generation, now that would be a miracle!
Di66en6ion 3 years ago
You obviously don't know anything about evolution as micro and macro are terms made up for evolution not by scientists but by people attacking evolution. Please show me this undeniable proof that 'macro' evolution doesn't happen?
They're exactly the same thing, same processes going on, the ONLY difference is the scale of time between the two.
Di66en6ion 3 years ago
1)I know more about your ridiculous theory of evolution than you may think. Words are created to define certain properties, conditions, and things of this world. The word micro and macro wasn't invented by any anti-evolutionist. Once again you prove that you know nothing of what you speak and like a zealot, you feel angry when someone criticizes your religious cult of Evolution.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
2)All dictionaries define Micro as this: micro-. prefix. Definition:. 1. small, minute microcosm. 2. using a microscope or requiring magnification microbiology. As you can see, the word micro was created to describe this other "universe" that exists but can't be seen by the naked eye. Macro is defined as this: mac-ro adj. 1. Of great size; large. 2. Large in scope or extent; large-scale.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
3)Basically the word macro defines everything that falls out of the micro category so it can seen by the naked eye. Thus, every species that lives in this world that we can see with our naked eye is part of the macrocosm. But I understand your need of mixing the two words macro and micro or even going as far as to have the guts & dementia to deny the need for the existence of these 2 words: because their 2 different definitions crumble your little theory into dust and you know it. Ha, ha, ha.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
4)So sad, but don't worry, this quasi-true, quasi-false theory of Evolution will not last long. Too many people are learning the fake circular logic behind it. The fossil records that supposedly back up evolution are dated, based on a dubious geological column. When evolutionists are asked what they used to define the age of each layer, they claim it's based on the fossil record. But wait a minute, wasn't the age of the fossils based on the geological column?
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
5)So, if the geological column defines the age of the fossils, how come the fossils define the age of the layers of the geological column? And that's when people discover that all those ridiculous numbers of millions or billions of years used to define the age of fossils were pulled out of some evolutionist's ass, ROFLMAO. Circular logic is another pathetic flaw found in the theory-cult-religion of evolution. Like I said before, evolution is useless in science. Creationism is a better theory.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
"geological column defines the age of the fossils, how come the fossils define the age of the layers of the geological column?"
That isn't remotely true, what you are revering to is relative dating techniques that state if you date something anything above it is younger and anything below it is older. Do you do objective research before you spout whatever Kent Hovind tells you?
sweatytoothmadman 3 years ago
Emulate a macro-environment inside the micro-world and notice how evolution all of a sudden stops in these micro-organisms. The Evolution theory is completely useless and hasn't helped science in the least. It's not a scientific law which is a universal truth. In fact, if we destroy this ridiculous Atheist cult of Evolution that is forced these days unto people we will still continue to make great advances in science. Evolution is meaningless, nothing, a simple tool of deceit, a cult.
MoooHamMad 3 years ago
"In fact, if we destroy this ridiculous Atheist cult of Evolution that is forced these days unto people we will still continue to make great advances in science. Evolution is meaningless, nothing, a simple tool of deceit, a cult."
You've just shown yourself to be a complete ignorant delusional fanatic, have a good day.
Di66en6ion 3 years ago