I'd believe Acharya (Dorothy M. Murdock) over this disgruntled "Christian" any day. Even though, I understand, that he is a Budhist...he still sounds like a thumper to me.
Cherry picking comments from the originator of an idea is what scholarship is. Rather than dissmissing your Grandfathers's work in it's entirity she has credited him with ideas she finds correct. The facts stand because the passages are similar. The reader may choose which meditation they prefer.
Thanks for your comments, however the video is about the intellectual dishonesty - the passages she quotes have entirely different meanings than what was stated in James' work. That is the only point to be made - whether or not Ms. Murdock agrees with James does not matter to me.
What is really going on?Is it true or not?Can you find me on facebook & let me know?Is it totally a lie,like "Zeitgeist" says or are the Bible literalists right?
@gusreifenkugel Its easy to show that Acharya S is a satanist. First you see that zeitgeist uses her work and She uses the work of Helena Blavatsky (a well known satanist). You also can see that they are against Christianity. They want people to believe in this new age bullshit but they don't tell them that its a luciferian ideology. Why you think? If they tell the truth, why don't they just get out of the dresser!? Because they are lying. The new age movement is evil.
I see, in your video you ask people to comment but you delete anyone's comment who disagrees with you ... you're not high on the integrity chart, Jack.
Jack Churchward is entitled to his opinion but the quotes he complains about are easily found on the net. He makes a mountain of a mole hill. Acharya never once said that James agreed with her theory. Jack, Buddhist or not, sounds like an angry xian.
I do believe Acharya has plans on a 2nd edition for Christ Conspiracy - maybe she will remove all of the Churchward quotes, then the Churchwards will be completely forgotten about & Jack will have something else to complain about.
You did a good job exposing how this author abused the message of James with her twisted handling of his words. Thanks for making this clear. But we'll forgive her, won't we.
I'd believe Acharya (Dorothy M. Murdock) over this disgruntled "Christian" any day. Even though, I understand, that he is a Budhist...he still sounds like a thumper to me.
palendromedary1 1 year ago
she was drawing from his evidence, not his conclusions. he didn't need to agree with her. you miss the point of scholarship
bosyeux2 2 years ago
Um this video is dishonest. James was used as a reference only.
theprankster1account 2 years ago
Cherry picking comments from the originator of an idea is what scholarship is. Rather than dissmissing your Grandfathers's work in it's entirity she has credited him with ideas she finds correct. The facts stand because the passages are similar. The reader may choose which meditation they prefer.
DrakeDorosh 2 years ago
Thanks for your comments, however the video is about the intellectual dishonesty - the passages she quotes have entirely different meanings than what was stated in James' work. That is the only point to be made - whether or not Ms. Murdock agrees with James does not matter to me.
jchurchward 2 years ago
What is really going on?Is it true or not?Can you find me on facebook & let me know?Is it totally a lie,like "Zeitgeist" says or are the Bible literalists right?
gusreifenkugel 2 years ago
@gusreifenkugel Its easy to show that Acharya S is a satanist. First you see that zeitgeist uses her work and She uses the work of Helena Blavatsky (a well known satanist). You also can see that they are against Christianity. They want people to believe in this new age bullshit but they don't tell them that its a luciferian ideology. Why you think? If they tell the truth, why don't they just get out of the dresser!? Because they are lying. The new age movement is evil.
axe414 1 year ago
oh i have these 2 books
CommonPurpose1 2 years ago
I see, in your video you ask people to comment but you delete anyone's comment who disagrees with you ... you're not high on the integrity chart, Jack.
Hercules2345 2 years ago
Jack Churchward is entitled to his opinion but the quotes he complains about are easily found on the net. He makes a mountain of a mole hill. Acharya never once said that James agreed with her theory. Jack, Buddhist or not, sounds like an angry xian.
I do believe Acharya has plans on a 2nd edition for Christ Conspiracy - maybe she will remove all of the Churchward quotes, then the Churchwards will be completely forgotten about & Jack will have something else to complain about.
Hercules2345 2 years ago
All the Buddhists recognize Jesus as a great man? Well, that does it for me. Case settled then eh, Jesus or bust.
Cliner97 3 years ago
Acharya is plain dishonest.
MagusSolitudo 3 years ago
You did a good job exposing how this author abused the message of James with her twisted handling of his words. Thanks for making this clear. But we'll forgive her, won't we.
TheDoveLady 3 years ago