V-Log for Reason, Episode 2

[michiganprada]

wow a straight man with the best view I ever heard thanks

[rettrovision]

Whoa - I thought you were Russian.

But here, you have an American accent.

[MANGSCHEUONiCS]

thats an awesome picture on the wall btw, french nuclear test 1970

[joeebrown18921973]

I think Redchango is a very educated person and speaks wisely about many issues. I do not agree with everything he says, just most of the things he says i do agree with though. Is he like a movie star or something? Hmmm he sure looks like he should be in the pictures. Well i guess i just wasted time, nothing i wrote was on the topic was it? hmm oh well

[amorra7]

This video is way too popular.... YouTube wont let me view it or your other one.. not right!

[jxwhit8]

As a former Christian... you know that homosexuality is considered immoral... and a good christian can not normalize the behavior and make it acceptable. They can not allow them to participate in one of the most sacred traditions they know... marriage. Love the sinner... not the sin. This is a love thy neighbor issue... Christians lover their Gay neighbors. This is a "you will not teach my kids that filthy act" kind of thing.

[jxwhit8]

Right on Dude... I say we throw out all moral standards that was brought on by religion. Like thou shalt not steal...

Like God ordained inalienable rights...

Hell... lets just throw out the constitution altogether.

[redchango]

I wouldn't go that far. Stealing, not killing, etc. aren't "religious" morals. Those are the same morals that any one has, regardless of religious or nonreligious affiliation. They're natural.

[jxwhit8]

I disagree... thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not kill.... these are Bible versus and MORAL STANDARDS imposed on us by religion. So are you suggesting we should pick and choose what moral standards are good and which ones are not?

You know.. the WHO (world health organization) says homosexuality is an abnormal behavior that has bred disease disproportionately... shouldnt we then ban gay behavior altogether just for the health and safety of our society? Thats not a religious issue.

[redchango]

When you read the Bible and see the Golden Rule, "Treat others as you would have others treat you," and then you decide it is a better moral precept than Deuteronomy 22:13, which says if a woman can't prove that she's a virgin on her wedding night she should be stoned (executed) on her father's doorstep ... is that religion or natural moral intuition?

Are you telling me that it's okay to kill wives that weren't virgins on their wedding night? Because that's essentially what you're saying.

[jxwhit8]

Not even a good point. Deuteronomy and Leviticus... are all old Testament. The New Testament is the new covenant and law and replace the old testament.

Now... if you spent some time in Sunday School, or studying Christianity... you would know this.

[redchango]

The 10 Commandments are Old Testament as well, if you haven't noticed.

[jxwhit8]

and also in the new testament... its a 'carry-over" kind of thing.

[amorra7]

Woah????

I can not find anything that remote has that as the WHO's stance on homosexuality or even butt-sex. And this would most likely be about butt-sex and HIV, as why else would the WHO care who does who, but since vaginal sex does a good job at spreading that nasty virus too this is all total BS.

I can only assume that you pulled this information out of your ass. This does not make fact.