In our sister-language German you can only say "that's the house in which I live" ("das ist das Haus, in dem ich wohne"), but in our other sister-language Icelandic (Old Norse), you can only say "that's the house that I live in" ("það er húsið sem ég búa í").
In English we can have either, but I've seen (heard) how unnatural it can be not to end with a preposition when asked by telemarketers "with whom am I speaking with?"
"Give them what they requested." That doesn't sound weird and avoids the terminal preposition. Come on Merriam-Webster, shouldn't you be promoting the use of your famous dictionaries and thesaruses to improve the quality of our writing?
@99davidpaul They *are* helping us improve the quality of our writing -- by distinguishing real rules of English from superstitions. We do not improve the quality of our writing by avoiding the terminal preposition, because there's nothing wrong with ending a sentence with a preposition (especially when there's an object to the preposition right in the sentence). That's the point.
My favorite is when people go the effort of "Whom did you go to school with?" getting the pronoun correct and leaving the preposition dangling off the end, to fend for itself?
Makes Van Gogh want to bite his other ear off?
Perhaps, giving it a little thought, it could be recast as, "Who attended school with you?" ~sCz
I was taught in school to rephrase the sentence if it doesn't seem practical when made proper. Instead, Merriam Webster is telling us, "To hell with it!" This is ridiculous!!!
@Ylirymiry Sorry, but English is primarily a Germanic language, not Romance. It came to England from the Saxon invaders from what is now Germany. So the obsession with turning English into a Latin-based grammar that occurred in the 1700s was the REAL abomination to English.
Webster is doing no such thing. They're merely separating actual grammar rules from silly grammar myths -- and this is an example of the latter. The entire notion of the rule is predicated on the fact that you can't end a sentence with a preposition *in Latin.* English is not Latin.
I agree, but I get thrown for a loop when there's the preposition appears in an infinitive phrase instead of a relative clause. For example: "A preposition is a perfectly appropriate kind of word to end a sentence with." Where is the object of the preposition "with"? (Certainly not the word "preposition"; that's the subject of the sentence. Nor "kind of word," which is the predicate nominative.) I don't see an easy way around this without rephrasing the sentence to get rid of the infinitive.
@Ashtar94 "To end a sentence with a preposition is a perfectly appropriate." You don't need to get rid of the infinitive; only move things around a bit.
@JoaeP2 I agree that it's perfectly appropriate to end a sentence with a preposition. It's just that in most cases, the preposition has an object *somewhere* in the sentence. That's not always the case with infinitives -- e.g., "A preposition is a perfectly appropriate word to end a sentence with." It seems strange to me to have a preposition without an object -- which is often the case when the sentence has an infinitive.
I'm Arab. And the transition from writing in Arabic to writing in English was accompanied by many irregularities, one of which was ending with preposition.
Except Churchill's example doesn't work as well as we would have it since the preposition is actually a particle in the phrasal verb to put up with, verses a preposition like "to" in to speak to, which is not a phrasal verb. Of course, no one will usually be able to respond to Churchill's repartee in such a way, however, if they did! IF THEY DID! :)
Even though English is not my native first tongue, I use and end sentences with prepositions all the time, it just seems, feels, and sounds so natural.. By the way, "this is the sort of nonsense up with which I will not put" has become one of my fav lines. Did I mention that you Emily Brewster are beautiful, simply the most gorgeous grammarian I've ever seen.
@GirlCraft This is so very true! It's only after finding a gem like this channel that I realize how much I have missed out not knowing about it before. ^_^
The problem with the (supposed) Churchill quote is that "with" is not a preposition in the sentence you're trying to avoid. Rather, it's a part of the phrasal verb "put up with". So breaking it apart to mis-correct it doesn't just sound wrong, it IS wrong.
In our sister-language German you can only say "that's the house in which I live" ("das ist das Haus, in dem ich wohne"), but in our other sister-language Icelandic (Old Norse), you can only say "that's the house that I live in" ("það er húsið sem ég búa í").
In English we can have either, but I've seen (heard) how unnatural it can be not to end with a preposition when asked by telemarketers "with whom am I speaking with?"
Aeschylus 2 days ago
My prof:"David, never end your sentence with a preposition
Me
watch?v=toxIiMWQgKA
intermaniax1 1 week ago
So, this is where the grammar nazis meet...
fernank017 1 month ago
Turn switch up to on, down to off. Can you feel that, Grammar? Does it sting? Ended that sentence in SIX PREPOSITIONS! Catch phrase!
dbuschhorn 1 month ago 4
@dbuschhorn On and off hardly count as prepositions when used this way :P
NumbFlynn 2 days ago
"Give them what they requested." That doesn't sound weird and avoids the terminal preposition. Come on Merriam-Webster, shouldn't you be promoting the use of your famous dictionaries and thesaruses to improve the quality of our writing?
99davidpaul 1 month ago
@99davidpaul They *are* helping us improve the quality of our writing -- by distinguishing real rules of English from superstitions. We do not improve the quality of our writing by avoiding the terminal preposition, because there's nothing wrong with ending a sentence with a preposition (especially when there's an object to the preposition right in the sentence). That's the point.
Ashtar94 1 month ago
My favorite is when people go the effort of "Whom did you go to school with?" getting the pronoun correct and leaving the preposition dangling off the end, to fend for itself?
Makes Van Gogh want to bite his other ear off?
Perhaps, giving it a little thought, it could be recast as, "Who attended school with you?" ~sCz
ChazMyTube 3 weeks ago
Apparently, sentence fragments are also okay, judging from the description.
curtismason111 1 month ago
I enjoy the last sentence, they way she said it is so funny LOL
TheTrieutran 2 months ago
I only end sentences with prepositions whenever the alternative sounds silly =D
Jonassoe 2 months ago
Emily's videos are my favourites too :D.
silversmith8 2 months ago
Emily Brewster's discussions are my favorite. They answer our common grammatical confusions.
robby2hollywood 3 months ago
I was taught in school to rephrase the sentence if it doesn't seem practical when made proper. Instead, Merriam Webster is telling us, "To hell with it!" This is ridiculous!!!
Ylirymiry 5 months ago
@Ylirymiry Sorry, but English is primarily a Germanic language, not Romance. It came to England from the Saxon invaders from what is now Germany. So the obsession with turning English into a Latin-based grammar that occurred in the 1700s was the REAL abomination to English.
ArcticFahx 4 months ago 4
@Ylirymiry
Webster is doing no such thing. They're merely separating actual grammar rules from silly grammar myths -- and this is an example of the latter. The entire notion of the rule is predicated on the fact that you can't end a sentence with a preposition *in Latin.* English is not Latin.
shammadamma 6 days ago
This is absolutely appalling... Do what feels right? Let's all start speaking ebonics!
Ylirymiry 5 months ago
@Ylirymiry Is that what really feels right to you? I'm so sorry.
sunkenOcean01 4 months ago
I agree, but I get thrown for a loop when there's the preposition appears in an infinitive phrase instead of a relative clause. For example: "A preposition is a perfectly appropriate kind of word to end a sentence with." Where is the object of the preposition "with"? (Certainly not the word "preposition"; that's the subject of the sentence. Nor "kind of word," which is the predicate nominative.) I don't see an easy way around this without rephrasing the sentence to get rid of the infinitive.
Ashtar94 7 months ago
@Ashtar94 "To end a sentence with a preposition is a perfectly appropriate." You don't need to get rid of the infinitive; only move things around a bit.
JoaeP2 7 months ago
@JoaeP2 I agree that it's perfectly appropriate to end a sentence with a preposition. It's just that in most cases, the preposition has an object *somewhere* in the sentence. That's not always the case with infinitives -- e.g., "A preposition is a perfectly appropriate word to end a sentence with." It seems strange to me to have a preposition without an object -- which is often the case when the sentence has an infinitive.
Ashtar94 6 months ago
Nice post ! Thanks for straightening that one out.
RTube7 7 months ago
I wonder if Emily knows she seems to be developing a fan club.
BillionSix 8 months ago
I'm Arab. And the transition from writing in Arabic to writing in English was accompanied by many irregularities, one of which was ending with preposition.
It's good to know that it is ok.
trexaur123 9 months ago
Next, I hope you take on starting sentences with conjunctions.
What's wrong with starting a sentence...but-first?
DataRelater 10 months ago
Never end a sentence with a preposition? I always thought that was a silly rule.
Where are you from?
I am next.
When you reconstruct a sentence to get the preposition off the end, you often wind up sounding like Yoda.
digitaldown 10 months ago 2
I really enjoyed this. I've gone full nerd and I'm really ok with it. :-)
TheUniversalWoman 10 months ago
Except Churchill's example doesn't work as well as we would have it since the preposition is actually a particle in the phrasal verb to put up with, verses a preposition like "to" in to speak to, which is not a phrasal verb. Of course, no one will usually be able to respond to Churchill's repartee in such a way, however, if they did! IF THEY DID! :)
Infomative video, thank you. :) Go Merriam (and descriptivists everywhere :)
semasiologistics 10 months ago
Lovely!!!
driddy1 10 months ago
Very interesting. I hope to see more of these.
tommylehman 10 months ago
Even though English is not my native first tongue, I use and end sentences with prepositions all the time, it just seems, feels, and sounds so natural.. By the way, "this is the sort of nonsense up with which I will not put" has become one of my fav lines. Did I mention that you Emily Brewster are beautiful, simply the most gorgeous grammarian I've ever seen.
bangyourhead55 11 months ago
@GirlCraft This is so very true! It's only after finding a gem like this channel that I realize how much I have missed out not knowing about it before. ^_^
soraluna606 1 year ago
This was both entertaining and educational, thank you! I'm very glad that I found your videos and cannot wait to watch the rest of them.
soraluna606 1 year ago
I see this one going viral like the octopus one.
oisiaa 1 year ago
The problem with the (supposed) Churchill quote is that "with" is not a preposition in the sentence you're trying to avoid. Rather, it's a part of the phrasal verb "put up with". So breaking it apart to mis-correct it doesn't just sound wrong, it IS wrong.
Plutor 1 year ago
These vids are crack-cocaine equivalents to logophiles -- pithy, fun times which end in acute withdrawal.
clavidor12121 1 year ago 28
As always, highly interesting nuggets of information. Thanks.
josephodonoghue 1 year ago
Thumbs way up!
Chilly296 1 year ago